This is my presentation to the Webinar and Townhall Meeting of the Family & Culture Special Interest Group of the World Association of Cultural Psychiatry (WACP)
Saturday, April 2, 2022
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35540.27523
To view the video of the webinar presentation and town hall meeting, please see:
https://waculturalpsy.org/wacp-news/video-of-webinar-of-4-2-22-on-family-culture/
Or directly on youtube:
https://youtu.be/doltJ1VTV38
This presentation in detail shows the relationship between evolution, and Islam and evolution and Social Sciences. Moreover, it explains in detail the criticism of the Darwinian ideas present in social sciences.
web site: http://www.joycenter.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Mans-Search-for-Meaning-Viktor-Frankl.pdf
A case can be made that since the main basis of "The Theory" of evolution is the "Self-preservation principle". That is, how could the propagation of the a specie be enhanced by the demeaning action of a group against its constituents and even self-against-self. The only explanation is that humas were created and not a result of a random sett of actions causing consciousness arriving from non-conscious matter. Life comes from life, and intelligence (DNA), comes from intelligence. This book can be contrasted with: The Lucifer Effect Understanding How Good People Turn Evil by Philip Zimbardo' and also with the Bible for a view of The Meaning of Life from ancient to contemporary writings for balance understanding of the physical (Psyche) to the metaphysical (Spiritual). We can view the human condition as the effect of gravity of interacting physical objects and human interaction as the response to spiritual influence (angels and demons).
This is my presentation to the Webinar and Townhall Meeting of the Family & Culture Special Interest Group of the World Association of Cultural Psychiatry (WACP)
Saturday, April 2, 2022
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35540.27523
To view the video of the webinar presentation and town hall meeting, please see:
https://waculturalpsy.org/wacp-news/video-of-webinar-of-4-2-22-on-family-culture/
Or directly on youtube:
https://youtu.be/doltJ1VTV38
This presentation in detail shows the relationship between evolution, and Islam and evolution and Social Sciences. Moreover, it explains in detail the criticism of the Darwinian ideas present in social sciences.
web site: http://www.joycenter.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Mans-Search-for-Meaning-Viktor-Frankl.pdf
A case can be made that since the main basis of "The Theory" of evolution is the "Self-preservation principle". That is, how could the propagation of the a specie be enhanced by the demeaning action of a group against its constituents and even self-against-self. The only explanation is that humas were created and not a result of a random sett of actions causing consciousness arriving from non-conscious matter. Life comes from life, and intelligence (DNA), comes from intelligence. This book can be contrasted with: The Lucifer Effect Understanding How Good People Turn Evil by Philip Zimbardo' and also with the Bible for a view of The Meaning of Life from ancient to contemporary writings for balance understanding of the physical (Psyche) to the metaphysical (Spiritual). We can view the human condition as the effect of gravity of interacting physical objects and human interaction as the response to spiritual influence (angels and demons).
The Social Phenomenology of RD Laing: A Re-Appraisal of R.D. Laing, His Relat...Université de Montréal
Scottish psychiatrist-psychoanalyst Ronald David Laing (1927-1989) is known for his pioneering studies in the tradition of psychodynamic psychiatry (cf. Ellenberger, 1970) of the alien and alienating experiences that are known under the rubric of schizophrenia (cf. Woods, 2011). Along the way, he explored the “divided self” (Laing, 1960) in the “politics of the family” (Laing, 1969) and the sources of “reason and violence” (Laing & Cooper, 1964) in modern society, creating a model of existential psychotherapy (Laing, 1987a) with his social phenomenology (Laing, 1987b).
Schooled in mainstream mid-20th century British psychiatry and then psychoanalysis, reading phenomenological philosophy the whole time, R.D. Laing wrote an undisputed classic, The Divided Self (1960; see Itten & Young, 2012), followed by Self and Others (1961) and others. Before post-modernism and deconstruction, Laing posited the dispersion of self in the bosom of the modern family with its attendant anxieties and insecurities (Laing, 1969; Di Nicola, 2022). Instead of the romantic notion of two becoming one, Laing gives us a vision of the self at odds with and divided against itself, and this opens up vistas for admitting all kinds of psychological and relational experiences on the analytic couch, including psychosis and paranoia. Furthermore, he attempted to normalize such experiences going so far as to argue that they were part of a process of psychic exploration and a shamanic journey rather than pathologizing them. This has even greater resonance today in such contemporary movements as the Hearing Voices Network.
In Laing’s (1987a) model, employing “existential phenomenology in psychotherapy,” even supposedly psychotic and paranoid experiences have meaning if we could only hear them and understand them. Rather than being reductive, it’s hermeneutic, leading existential philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre (1964) to write of Laing’s and Cooper’s (1964) efforts create “a truly human psychiatry”:
"I am convinced that your efforts will bring us closer to the day when psychiatry will, at last, become a truly human psychiatry."
Keywords: RD Laing, social phenomenology, Karl Jaspers, J-P Sartre, psychotherapy, schizophrenia, paranoia
Shiva Kumar Srinivasan has a Ph.D. in English Literature and Psychoanalysis from the University of Wales, Cardiff (1996).
His thesis was titled 'Oedipus Redux: D.H. Lawrence in the Freudian Field.'
These clinical notes should be of use to both theorists and practitioners of psychoanalysis in the tradition of Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan.
The Social Phenomenology of RD Laing: A Re-Appraisal of R.D. Laing, His Relat...Université de Montréal
Scottish psychiatrist-psychoanalyst Ronald David Laing (1927-1989) is known for his pioneering studies in the tradition of psychodynamic psychiatry (cf. Ellenberger, 1970) of the alien and alienating experiences that are known under the rubric of schizophrenia (cf. Woods, 2011). Along the way, he explored the “divided self” (Laing, 1960) in the “politics of the family” (Laing, 1969) and the sources of “reason and violence” (Laing & Cooper, 1964) in modern society, creating a model of existential psychotherapy (Laing, 1987a) with his social phenomenology (Laing, 1987b).
Schooled in mainstream mid-20th century British psychiatry and then psychoanalysis, reading phenomenological philosophy the whole time, R.D. Laing wrote an undisputed classic, The Divided Self (1960; see Itten & Young, 2012), followed by Self and Others (1961) and others. Before post-modernism and deconstruction, Laing posited the dispersion of self in the bosom of the modern family with its attendant anxieties and insecurities (Laing, 1969; Di Nicola, 2022). Instead of the romantic notion of two becoming one, Laing gives us a vision of the self at odds with and divided against itself, and this opens up vistas for admitting all kinds of psychological and relational experiences on the analytic couch, including psychosis and paranoia. Furthermore, he attempted to normalize such experiences going so far as to argue that they were part of a process of psychic exploration and a shamanic journey rather than pathologizing them. This has even greater resonance today in such contemporary movements as the Hearing Voices Network.
In Laing’s (1987a) model, employing “existential phenomenology in psychotherapy,” even supposedly psychotic and paranoid experiences have meaning if we could only hear them and understand them. Rather than being reductive, it’s hermeneutic, leading existential philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre (1964) to write of Laing’s and Cooper’s (1964) efforts create “a truly human psychiatry”:
"I am convinced that your efforts will bring us closer to the day when psychiatry will, at last, become a truly human psychiatry."
Keywords: RD Laing, social phenomenology, Karl Jaspers, J-P Sartre, psychotherapy, schizophrenia, paranoia
Shiva Kumar Srinivasan has a Ph.D. in English Literature and Psychoanalysis from the University of Wales, Cardiff (1996).
His thesis was titled 'Oedipus Redux: D.H. Lawrence in the Freudian Field.'
These clinical notes should be of use to both theorists and practitioners of psychoanalysis in the tradition of Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan.
From Chekhov to Pavlov, From Vygotsky to Luria: A Brilliant Foundation, A Pr...Université de Montréal
Invited Keynote Address:
"From Chekhov to Pavlov, From Vygotsky to Luria:
A Brilliant Foundation, A Promising Future – Russian Adventures in the Humanities, Medical Psychology and Psychiatry"
All-Russia Inter-university Scientific Conference
"Mental Health: Modern Trends & Prospects"
Moscow, Russian Federation
16 December 2021
Learning Objectives
1. To review the contributions of four pioneering Russian theorists and practitioners in the humanities, behavioural psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry
2. To examine their legacies in the light of current issues in psychiatry and the medical humanities
3. To highlight the promises and challenges of a career in the branch of medicine called psychiatry at the crossroads of social sciences, the humanities, and neuroscience
PROJECT #3RETAIL LOCATIONSInstructions1. In an Word d.docxbriancrawford30935
PROJECT #3
RETAIL LOCATIONS
Instructions:
1. In an Word document, use the list provided at the end of these instructions to describe the following for each retail establishment listed:
a. Type of retail location
b. Factors affecting location (consumer shopping situations)
c. What considerations might the retailer had to have considered when thinking about their location
d. Parking considerations?
e. Who is close to this particular retailer? How will that affect the business?
f. What is their trade area? Tapestry Segment (focus segment)?
2. List of retailers:
a. Belks
b. JCPenney
c. Trendy Pieces
d. Lowes
e. Kohl’s
f. Dollar General
The Return of the Repressed
Psychology's Problematic Relations With Psychoanalysis, 1909-1960
Gail A. Hornstein Mount Holyoke College
When psychoanalysis first arrived in the United States,
most psychologists ignored it. By the 1920s, however, psy-
choanalysis had so captured the public imagination that
it threatened to eclipse experimental psychology entirely.
This article analyzes the complex nature of this threat
and the myriad ways that psychologists responded to it.
Because psychoanalysis entailed precisely the sort of rad-
ical subjectivity that psychologists had renounced as un-
scientific, core assumptions about the meaning of science
were at stake. Psychologists' initial response was to retreat
into positivism, thereby further limiting psychology's rel-
evance and scope. By the 1950s, a new strategy had
emerged: Psychoanalytic concepts would be put to exper-
imental test, and those that qualified as "scientific" would
be retained. This reinstated psychologists as arbiters of
the mental world and restored "objective" criteria as the
basis for making claims. A later tactic—co-opting psy-
choanalytic concepts into mainstream psychology—had
the ironic effect of helping make psychology a more flexible
and broad-based discipline.
Freud and Jung were having dinner in Bremen. It was
the evening before they set sail for the Clark conference,
the occasion of Freud's only visit to America. Jung started
talking about certain mummies in the lead cellars of the
city. Freud became visibly disturbed. "Why are you so
concerned with these corpses?" he asked several times.
Jung went on talking. Suddenly, without warning, Freud
fell to the floor in a faint. When he recovered, he accused
Jung of harboring death wishes against him. But it was
not Jung who wanted Freud dead. Had Freud only known
what American psychologists were about to do to psy-
choanalysis, he might never have gotten up off the floor.
There is no easy way to talk about psychology's re-
lations with psychoanalysis.1 It is a story dense with dis-
illusionment and the shapeless anger of rejection. Each
side behaved badly, and then compounded its insensitivity
with disdain. Their fates bound together like Romulus
and Remus, psychology and psychoanalysis struggled to
find their separate spheres, only to end up pitted against
one another at every turn. To.
At the age of 14, Frankl wrote a school paper, We and the World P.docxikirkton
At the age of 14, Frankl wrote a school paper, “We and the World Process”. In this he expressed the idea that there must exist a universal balancing principle. At age 15, he attended night classes in the people’s college even though he was still in high school. He took courses in applied Psychology and experimental Psychology. This course work motivated Frankl to write to Sigmund Freud. After Freud replied, a correspondence developed. During this time Freud accepted Frankl’s article Internationale Zeitschrift fur Psychoanalyse, for publication. However, by the time this article was published, Frankl had come under the influence of Alfred Adler and Individual Psychology.
At the age of 17, Frankl gave a lecture at the people’s college, for a philosophy seminar. His topic was The Meaning of Life. From this lecture he developed two main points for his future theories. The first was that life does not answer our questions about the meaning of life but rather puts those questions to us, leaving it for us to find the answers by deciding what we find meaningful. The second point was that the ultimate meaning of life is beyond the grasp of our intellect, but is something we only can live by, without ever being able to define it cognitively.
After the First World War, there were years of great soul-searching in Austria. Existential questions were on everyone’s mind and they all dealt with the meaning of life. It was at this time that Adler established a school of psychology that searched for concepts that would allow individual freedom. This attracted Frankl and the man who had once followed Freud’s theories began to form new concepts. He became a Social Democrat and in 1925 published Internatinale Zeitschrift fuer Individualpsychologie. Frankl became well known and well liked in this group. He soon began to develop ideas that were outside the traditional framework of Adler’s system of thinking. However, even until his death, Frankl felt an attachment to Adler’s Individual Psychology. The main difference in Logotherapy and Individual Psychology are views concerning the meaning of life.
In the 1930’s, Frankl developed new concepts and coined new terms. The term Logotherapy was first used in 1926 when Frankl presented a lecture at the Academic Society for Medical Psychology. He later used the term Existenzanalyse, (existential analysis) but this was later found to be confused with Binswanger’s Daseinsanalyse and Frankl went back to the term Logotherapy.
With the rise of Hitler, Frankl was taken to a concentration camp. Although he was stripped of everything, during this time he managed to write his book Aerztliche Seelsorge, later published in English as The Doctor and the Soul. This book contained the essence of Frankl’s thoughts and theories. Frankl considered this experience a validation of the concepts on which Logotherapy is based. The three tenets of Logotherapy were tested in the camps.
After being released from the concentration camps, Frank ...
The night before the meeting, I decided to change the presentation. This was the final one presented.
APA -Humanistic Psychology Division -D32
First meeting at Argosy University San Francisco by Lucia Merino, Psychology Doctor Candidate.
Essay about Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism
Evaluation of The Psychoanalytic Approach Essay
Advantages And Disadvantages Of Psychoanalysis
Essay on Psychoanalysis
Five Key Concepts Of Psychoanalysis
Psychoanalysis : What Is Psychoanalysis?
Psychoanalysis And Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Metamorphosis Psychoanalysis
Reflection Of The Psychoanalytic Perspective
Objective Psychology and Psychoanalysis Essay
Psychoanalysis And Psychoanalysis
Psychoanalysis In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein
Psychoanalysis In English Literature
A Look Into Psychoanalysis Essay
Outline Of Psychoanalysis
Psychoanalysis Of Psychoanalysis
CHAPTER 3A PSYCHODYNAMIC THEORY FREUDS PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY.docxwalterl4
CHAPTER 3
A PSYCHODYNAMIC THEORY: FREUD'S PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY QUESTIONS TO BE ADDRESSED IN THIS CHAPTER SIGMUND FREUD (1856–1939): A VIEW OF THE THEORIST FREUD'S VIEW OF THE PERSON The Mind as an Energy System The Individual in Society FREUD'S VIEW OF THE SCIENCE OF PERSONALITY FREUD'S PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY Structure Levels of Consciousness and the Concept of the Unconscious Dreams The Motivated Unconscious Relevant Psychoanalytic Research Current Status of the Concept of the Unconscious The Psychoanalytic Unconscious and the Cognitive Unconscious Id, Ego, and Superego Process Life and Death Instincts The Dynamics of Functioning Anxiety, Mechanisms of Defense, and Contemporary Research on Defensive Processes Denial Projection Isolation, Reaction Formation, and Sublimation Repression Growth and Development The Development of the Instincts and Stages of Development Erikson's Psychosocial Stages of Development The Importance of Early Experience The Development of Thinking Processes MAJOR CONCEPTS REVIEW Chapter Focus The number-one player on the tennis team is getting ready to play for the state title. She has never met her opponent before, so she decides to introduce herself before the match. She strolls onto the court where her opponent is warming up and says. “Hi, I'm Amy. Glad to beat you.” You can imagine how embarrassed Amy was! Flustered, she corrected her innocent mistake and walked over to her side of the court to warm up. “Wow,” Amy thought, “where did that come from?” Was Amy's verbal slip so innocent? Freud wouldn't have thought so. In his view, Amy's silly mistake was actually a very revealing display of unconscious aggressive drives. Freud's psychoanalytic theory is illustrative of a psychodynamic and clinical approach to personality. Behavior is interpreted as a result of the dynamic interplay among motives, drives, needs, and conflicts. The research consists mainly of clinical investigations as shown in an emphasis on the individual, in the attention given to individual differences, and in attempts to assess and understand the total individual. Contemporary researchers, however, devote much attention to the challenge of studying psychodynamic processes in the experimental laboratory. QUESTIONS TO BE ADDRESSED IN THIS CHAPTER How did Freud develop his theory, and how did historical and personal events shape this development? What are the key features of Freud's theoretical model of the human mind? How do people protect themselves against experiences of anxiety, and in what ways (according to Freud) are these anxiety-reduction strategies a centerpiece of personality dynamics? How important is early childhood experience for later personality development? SIGMUND FREUD (1856–1939): A VIEW OF THE THEORIST Sigmund Freud was born in Moravia (in what is now the city of Fribor of the Czech Republic) in 1856. His family soon moved to Vienna, where he spent most of his life. Freud was the first child of his .
“A Social Psychiatry Manifesto”
Vincenzo Di Nicola , MPhil, MD, PhD, FRCPC, DFAPA
Psychiatric Grand Rounds
VA Boston Mental Health Care System
Harvard South Shore Psychiatry Residency
April 4, 2020 at 12:00 PM Eastern Time
Purpose Statement
To give an overview of the history and current status of Social Psychiatry with some applications of relevance Veterans and their families
Several sentences that describe the training.
• What is the current knowledge deficit, or gap?
A better understanding of the contributions of social psychiatry
• How does the information you are presenting fill that gap?
By providing the broader context of social psychiatry to understand veterans and their families
• How will it benefit Veterans?
By providing a broader context, the presenter hopes to inform clinicians and policy-makers of the importance of social context and family and social relationships
Objectives
The objectives are what the learners will be able to do after attending the training. It is best that each objective has only one item being focused on.
At the conclusion of this educational program, learners will be able to:
1. Describe and define Social Psychiatry;
2. List the three main branches of Social Psychiatry;
3. Name two major public health projects of Social Psychiatry;
4. Give at least two examples of the clinical and policy relevance of Social Psychiatry for Veterans and their families.
In order to give us background on the influence of psychoanalysis not just within psychology but within culture generally (including the fascination with dreams and symbolism that we see in much of mid-20th century Western art and film) I’ve uploaded an article on the two warring giants, Freud and Jung. Note three new pieces of information you learned. Why do you think there was, and still is, so much fascination with the unconscious and so much disagreement about how its functions are described
2. The attack on psychoanalysis in the Third Reich led to the flight, exile, or imprisonment and sometimes death of influential researchers and theorists, particularly Jewish ones. In an earlier board you considered the role of government in psychology, but we have seldom seen such sweeping and violent intervention into science from governmental authority. Note any three aspects of the political standing of psychology and psychiatry that struck you in your reading of the uploaded article. What do you think are contexts or characteristics that led some non-Jewish figures to protest and some to acquiesce in the suppression and condemnation of the work of their Jewish colleagues
Please answer both questions and all parts of the question.
Shiva Kumar Srinivasan has a Ph.D. in English Literature and Psychoanalysis from the University of Wales at Cardiff.
These clinical notes summarize the main points raised by the Lacanian analyst Robert Samuels on the question of analytic technique.
These clinical notes should make it possible for both beginners and clinicians to relate Freudian concepts with Lacanian terms like the real, the imaginary, and the symbolic more effectively.
Philosophy & Psychiatry: Reflections of Mind - AMPQ - 11 June 2009Université de Montréal
This presentation reviews the relationship between psychiatry and philosophy, including philosophy of mind, philosophy of science, and the definition of person, identity and what we consider as essentially human qualities.
"Badiou, the Event, and Psychiatry. Part I: Trauma and Event" - Di Nicola - A...Université de Montréal
"Badiou, the Event, and Psychiatry" by Vincenzo Di Nicola Part I: Trauma and Event. Part II: Psychiatry of the Event This online blog of the American Philosophical Association is an overview of my work with French philosopher Alain Badiou for my doctoral dissertation ("Trauma and Event: A Philosophical Archaeology," Di Nicola, 2012) and my subsequent elaboration of his theory of the event to announce an "Evental psychiatry."
Link: https://blog.apaonline.org/2017/11/23/badiou-the-event-and-psychiatry-part-1-trauma-and-event/
Keynote Address - Conflicts, Culture and Social Wellness: Social Psychiatry’s...Université de Montréal
Abstract
Background:
Responding to the IASP Conference theme of “Conflicts, Culture and Social Wellness,” the author proposes Social Psychiatry’s role in promoting belonging and unity (Di Nicola 2013, 2018). Drawing on the history of Social Psychiatry (SP) and Cultural Psychiatry (CP), the author offers a schema of the distinguishing features and identity of each branch of psychiatry (Antić, 2021; Di Nicola, 2019).
Issues:
Are the histories and current practices of CP and SP mutually compatible and enriching or are they hiving off into separate domains?
Proposition:
A schema will be presented for differentiating underlying assumptions and core features of these two allied but increasingly differentiated fields of psychiatry. Key domains include: core arguments/dynamics (CP’s critiques of Western psychiatry lead to negation of its claim to universality; SP’s documentation of social determinants of health (SDH/MH) affords the affirmation of SDH/MH across societies and over time); categories (CP addresses race and ethnicity; SP investigates class and social structure); allied fields (CP – medical anthropology; SP – medical sociology, epidemiology & public health); metaphors (CP – “prism”/refracting; horizontal approach, “across cultures”; SP – “creolization”/blending; vertical approach, layers of “social strata”); values (CP - diversity/equity; SP – unity/solidarity); research (CP - ethnographies, CFI; SP - epidemiology, SDH/MH); allied professional movements/outgrowths (CP - Global Mental Health; SP - community psychiatry); allied populist movements (CP – “Black Lives Matter” in the USA; SP – “Gilets jaunes” in France); and, critiques (CP/GMH - eg, China Mills; SP – “southern epistemologies,” the Global South; Di Nicola, 2020).
Outcomes:
Cumulative results of the two allied traditions, sometimes practiced by the same/overlapping clinical and research teams, are discussed under the rubric “centripetal” (unifying, integrating) versus “centrifugal” (separating, dispersing) impacts.
Implications:
The disparate methods and results of CP vs. SP reflect the diverse foundational discourses of these increasingly differentiated fields. CP has morphed into a study of Dostoyevski’s “the insulted and the injured” imbued with a liberal, progressive ideology, culminating in identity politics. Meanwhile, social class, the signal critical tool of everything social, from sociology to socialism and SP, is being supplanted by a focus on culture. The author solicits a debate on what this means for the future of CP & SP and whether a synthesis is still possible. As for SP, the author proposes that with its centripetal unifying and integrating practices, SP promotes belonging and unity in mental health care and in social theory ( Di Nicola, 2019).
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.12373.96483
1. PhD in Psychoanalytic Studies - Special Research Course Reading list
The ‘Different Self’: Idealisation, Narcissism and the Ideal Ego
Summer Term 2013
Dr Robbie Duschinsky
In investigating the issue of narcissism, Freud forges a powerful account of the
relationship between the ego, its ideals and the body. Building on Freud’s account, and
those of later analysts, the seminars will focus on the interpretation of ideals of
perfection, plenitude and purity. Our reading on the economic problem of narcissism
will be oriented, in particular, by Juliet Mitchell’s chapter ‘The Different Self, the Phallus
and the Father’ in Psychoanalysis and Feminism, and her work on the lateral axis. In the
course of our exploration, we will also consider contemporary debates in American
psychiatry over whether or not to remove ‘Narcissistic Personality Disorder’ as a
diagnostic category from DSM-5.
Preliminary Reading for Session 1
Philip Crockatt (2006): Freud's ‘On narcissism: an introduction’, Journal of
Child Psychotherapy, 32:01, 4-20
Sigmund Freud (1914) ‘On Narcissism’, translated in Standard Edition 14 and/or
http://www.freud2lacan.com/docs/On_Narcissim_with_Introduction.pdf
Sigmund Freud (1916-1917) ‘The Libido Theory and Narcissism’ Lecture 26 of the
Introductory Lectures, translated in Standard Edition 16.
Key texts
Aaron Pincus and Mark Lukowitsky (2010) ‘Pathological Narcissism and Narcissistic
Personality Disorder’ Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 6(8): 1-26
André Green (1982) Life Narcissism, Death Narcissism, London: Karnac
Béla Grunberger (1989) New Essays on Narcissism, London: Karnac
Edith Jacobson (1954) The Self and the Object World—Vicissitudes of their Infantile
Cathexes and their Influence on Ideational and Affective Development
Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 9:75-127
Heinz Kohut (1971) Analysis of the Self, International Universities Press
Jacques Lacan (1953-4) ‘The Topic of the Imaginary’ in Freud’s Papers on Technique, NY:
Norton
Janine Chasseguet-Smirgel (1985) Ego Ideal, NY: Free Association Press
Jean Laplanche (1976) Life and Death in Psychoanalysis, Baltimore, Maryland: John
Hopkins University Press
Joseph Sandler, Peter Fonagy and Ethel Spector Person ed. (1991) Freud's On
Narcissism: An Introduction, London: Karnac
Juliet Mitchell (2000) Siblings, Cambridge: Polity
Rosine J. Perelberg (2004) ‘Narcissistic Configurations’ The International Journal of
Psychoanalysis 85(5): 1065–1079
Sara Beardsworth (2004) ‘Narcissism’ in Julia Kristeva: Psychoanalysis and Modernity,
NY: SUNY
Sigmund Freud (1915) ‘Instincts and their vicissitudes’ translated in Standard Edition
14