N3352 Legacy of the Family 8-2019 Allard 1 Discussion Module 2-1 Family Health Promotion Name: Date: Post your initial response by 2359 Wednesday of Week 1. Post your replies to peers by 2359 Saturday of Week 1. TOPIC:  How do you see your role in Family Health Promotion?  Give an example of how you have promoted health in a family, as a professionally or as a non-healthcare professional. In our readings on page 208 promoting the health of the family as a unit and “encouraging families to value and incorporate health promotion into their lifestyle are seen as essential components of family nursing practice. Family health promotion refers to the activities that families engage in to strengthen the family as a unit. Family health promotion is defined as achieving maximum family well-being throughout the family life course and includes the biological, emotional, physical, and spiritual realms for family members and the family unit task of families is to teach health maintenance and health promotion, regardless of age.” (See the grading rubric on the next page.) N3352 Legacy of the Family 8-2019 Allard 2 Rubric: NOTE: All assignments must be submitted on time. Assignments submitted after the deadline will be accepted up to 48 hours with 5 late points off per day. Assignments will receive a grade of zero after 48 hours. Instructions: Review the Rubric to guide your discussion Discussion Response Target Acceptable Unacceptable Submitted on time (10 points) Response is posted by due date/time for each question (10-9 points) Response is posted by due date/time for each question (8-6 points) Response is NOT posted by the due date and time for each question (5-0 points) Length of Response (10 points) Response is 75–100 words. (10-9 points) Response is a minimum of 50 words. (8-6 points) Response is less than 50 words. (5-0 points) Incorporates Key Concepts (20 points) Response is substantive and incorporates key concepts and principles. (20-19 points) Response refers to only one key concept or principle. (18-7 points) Response refers to no key concepts or principles. (6-0 points) Includes Specific Examples (10 points) Response includes specific, personal, or professional examples. (10-9 points) Response includes a general, personal, or professional example. (8-6 points) Response does not include a personal or professional example (5-0 points) Replies to Peers Exceptional Acceptable Unacceptable Quantity of Replies (10 points) Robust and comprehensive replies are posted to 1 or more peer comments (10-9 points) Only brief reply is posted to 1 peer comment. (18-7 points) Reply is NOT posted to a peer’s comments (6-0 points) Timely Posting of Replies (10 points) Reply is posted on time (10-9 points ...

1. N3352 Legacy of the Family
8-2019 Allard 1
Discussion Module 2-1 Family Health Promotion
Name: Date:
Post your initial response by 2359 Wednesday of Week 1.
Post your replies to peers by 2359 Saturday of Week 1.
TOPIC:
family, as a
professionally or as a non-healthcare professional.
In our readings on page 208 promoting the health of the family
as a unit and
“encouraging families to value and incorporate health
promotion into their lifestyle are
seen as essential components of family nursing practice. Family
health promotion refers
to the activities that families engage in to strengthen the family

2. as a unit. Family health
promotion is defined as achieving maximum family well-being
throughout the family life
course and includes the biological, emotional, physical, and
spiritual realms for family
members and the family unit task of families is to teach health
maintenance and health
promotion, regardless of age.”
(See the grading rubric on the next page.)
N3352 Legacy of the Family
8-2019 Allard 2
Rubric:

3. NOTE: All assignments must be submitted on time.
Assignments submitted after the
deadline will be accepted up to 48 hours with 5 late points off
per day. Assignments will
receive a grade of zero after 48 hours.
Instructions: Review the Rubric to guide your discussion
Discussion
Response
Target Acceptable Unacceptable
Submitted on
time (10
points)
Response is
posted by due
date/time for
each question
(10-9 points)
Response is
posted by due
date/time for
each question
(8-6 points)
Response is
NOT posted by
the due date
and time for
each question
(5-0 points)

4. Length of
Response (10
points)
Response is
75–100 words.
(10-9 points)
Response is a
minimum of 50
words. (8-6
points)
Response is
less than 50
words.
(5-0 points)
Incorporates
Key Concepts
(20 points)
Response is
substantive
and
incorporates
key concepts
and principles.
(20-19 points)
Response
refers to only
one key

5. concept or
principle.
(18-7 points)
Response
refers to no
key concepts
or principles.
(6-0 points)
Includes
Specific
Examples
(10 points)
Response
includes
specific,
personal, or
professional
examples.
(10-9 points)
Response
includes a
general,
personal, or
professional
example.
(8-6 points)
Response

6. does not
include a
personal or
professional
example
(5-0 points)
Replies to
Peers
Exceptional Acceptable Unacceptable
Quantity of
Replies
(10 points)
Robust and
comprehensive
replies are
posted to 1 or
more peer
comments
(10-9 points)
Only brief reply
is posted to 1
peer comment.
(18-7 points)
Reply is NOT
posted to a
peer’s
comments

7. (6-0 points)
Timely
Posting of
Replies (10
points)
Reply is
posted on time
(10-9 points)
Reply is
posted on time
(8-6points)
Reply is NOT
posted on time
(5-0 points)
Length of
Reply
(10 points)
Each reply is
over 50 words.
(10 -9 points)
At least one
reply is a
minimum of 50
words. (8-6

8. points)
Replies are of
unacceptable
length. (5-0
points)
N3352 Legacy of the Family
8-2019 Allard 3
Relates to
Content (20
points)
Each reply
relates
substantively
to the peer’s
comment and
incorporates
key concepts
and principles.
(20-19 points)
Reply relates
to the peer’s
comments.

9. (18-7 points)
Replies do not
relate to the
peer’s
comments.
(6-0 points)
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment
TitleTotal PointsELM-540ELM-540-O501Literacy
Toolkit100.0CriteriaPercentageNo Submission (0.00%)
Insufficient (69.00%)Approaching (74.00%)Acceptable
(87.00%)Target (100.00%)CommentsPoints
EarnedCriteria100.0%Summary of Strategies 20.0%Not
addressed.Summary of strategies is poorly developed and
lacking detail of future amendment. Digital presentation
includes a surface level summary of strategies, with minimal
future amendment. Digital presentation includes a detailed and
relevant summary of each strategy, with credible future
amendment. Digital presentation includes a thorough and
comprehensive summary of each strategy, with in-depth future
amendments. Appropriate Interventions15.0%Not addressed.The
explanation as to how the language and literacy strategies
provide guidance for modifying instruction and determining
appropriate interventions with at-risk and struggling students is
not included or is inadequately addressed.A vague explanation
is included with limited details as to how the language and
literacy strategies provide guidance, modifying instruction and
determining appropriate interventions with at-risk and
struggling students is provided.Relevant and credible examples
as to how the language and literacy strategies provide guidance
for modifying instruction and determining appropriate
interventions with at-risk and struggling students are

10. provided.Thought-provoking and insightful examples as to how
the language and literacy strategies provide guidance for
modifying instruction and determining appropriate interventions
with at-risk and struggling students are thoroughly
provided.Manage and Monitor Success15.0%Not
addressed.Digital presentation includes examples that are
unrelated and inappropriate in explaining how to manage and
monitor the success of interventions for at-risk and struggling
readers.Digital presentation includes examples that are
rudimentary and lacking detail of how to manage and monitor
the success of interventions for at-risk and struggling
readers.Digital presentation includes relevant and credible
examples of how to manage and monitor the success of
interventions for at-risk and struggling readers.Digital
presentation includes insightful and thought-provoking
examples of how to manage and monitor the success of
interventions for at-risk and struggling readers. Progress
Data10.0%Not addressed.Digital presentation includes an
explanation that inadequately and poorly describes the ethical
way to communicate student progress data, and how to analyze
the data based on performance in order to modify
instruction.Digital presentation includes a basic and
rudimentary explanation of the ethical way to communication
student progress data, and how to analyze the data based on
performance in order to modify instruction.Digital presentation
includes a detailed and relevant explanation of the ethical way
to communication student progress data, and how to analyze the
data based on performance in order to modify
instruction.Digital presentation includes a substantial and in-
depth explanation of the ethical way to communication student
progress data, and how to analyze the data based on
performance in order to modify instruction.Collaboration with
Professionals10.0%Not addressed.Digital presentation
inadequately and poorly describes how to collaborate with
professionals in order to advance this professional
practice.Digital presentation includes a basic and rudimentary

11. description of how to collaborate with professionals in order to
advance this professional practice.Digital presentation includes
a detailed and adequate description of how to collaborate with
professionals in order to advance this professional
practice.Digital presentation includes a thoughtful and
insightful description of how to collaborate with professionals
in order to advance this professional practice. Research
Citations15.0%Not addressed.Many citations are missing where
needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the
submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many
aspects are missing or mistaken.some of the sources do not
support the submission; or APA is attempted where required,
but some aspects are missing or mistaken. All sources are
credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required
aspects of APA format are correct within the submission.All
sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the
submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct
within the submission.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)10.0%Not
addressed.Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or
word choice is present. Sentence structure is
lacking.Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they
do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence
structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related
language.Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors.
Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and
content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and
engaging.Presentation5.0%Not addressed.The work is sloppy or
chaotic. Work would not be presentable for public
dissemination.The work is somewhat disheveled and includes
several organizational flaws. Work would barely be presentable
for public dissemination.The overall appearance is generally
neat, with a few minor organizational flaws. Work would be

12. desirable for public dissemination.The work is well presented.
The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be
highly desirable for public dissemination.Total Weightage100%