The document outlines the author's views on the geopolitical situation involving Ukraine and Russia, emphasizing a long-standing expectation of conflict stemming from historical events and perceived threats from NATO. It argues against the notion of a distinct Ukrainian identity, claiming that Ukraine is merely a geographic designation rather than a nation, and critiques Western involvement in the region. The author concludes that the ongoing war is a product of manipulated historical narratives and political exploitation, resulting in divisions within Ukraine.

1. My position aboutUkraine, Russia, and the
Russian Special Operationsin Russian
Ukraine- in brief
Моя позиция об Украине, России и
российских спецоперацияхна Русской
Украине - вкратце
By Prof. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
Профессор Мухаммад Шамсаддин Мегаломматис
This is the response that I sent (Friday 18th of March 2022) to a Jeddah-based,
Tanzanian Muslim friend who asked me details about the Russian operations in
Russian Ukraine.
Being extremely busy, I did not have the time to expand about the topic, but I will
hopefully do so in the next few weeks.
------------------------------------------
1. MANY PEOPLEDID NOT EXPECT IT, BUT I DID.
Many say that they did not expect this event to happen; even my former professor in
France, the Georgian-Russian/German-French Hélène Carrère d'Encausse (pictures
below and in attachment),
This mistake is due to the fact that they take themselves too seriously and believe
their own lies and propaganda.
I expected it to happen since 2014.
When Yanukovic was overthrown, I concluded that that development was
apparently Putin’s major mistake.
In fact, I always believed (from 2000 until 2014) thatPutin had a wrong policy in
Ukraine and I was expecting the 2014 developments to happen too. I anticipated
them for long. The American-European interference in Ukraine goes back to the 90s,
when the criminal gangster Madeleine Albright expressed her «interest» in Ukraine
in public.
But this is an old story.
So, after 2014, I was convinced that Putin sooner or later would take revenge for
what they did to him in Ukraine at the time. What Russia did at the time, i.e. saving

2. and keeping Crimea, was the minimum Moscow could do; Russia was not well
prepared.
As I closely and continuously monitor Russian and Chinese armament news, I
noticed very well that the arms race among super powers was, already in 2017,
taking a totally different dimension that would cancel the need for aircraft carriers
and make many other arms obsolete. All these new types of arms are
hypersonic. Russia and China already in 2020-2021 gained a decisive edge over US
and NATO.
Meanwhile, America entered into competition in the field of hypersonic weapons,
also followed by other countries, notably India, France,Japan, North Korea, South
Korea, and Australia.
Do you know what hypersonic means?
It means a weapon that exceeds 5 times the speed of sound.
It was a matter of time until the US come up with one or two types (that are currently
under development) of hypersonic weapons and then these could be installed in
military bases in Ukraine. Putin said it openly that it would mean just 2 minutes until
these missiles reach Moscow.
It was very clear that the economic preparations were also underway; all these
massive purchases of gold by Russia and China meant something.
It is clear that Ukraine with an area larger than France and smaller than Turkey is
viewed by Russians as the necessary military depth opposite NATO bases in Eastern
Europe, i.e. Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, and Turkey. Bear also in mind that of
course Russians will defend their entire territory in case of an attack, but certainly
the best defended region will be Moscow — not St. Petersburg.
-------------------------
2. THE PLAN TO SPLIT RUSSIA TO 5-10 PIECES
Now, the entire story of Ukraine and Russia is nothing more than part of the Western
plan to cut (not anymore the USSR but) Russia to pieces. They also planned to split
many other countries: Turkey, Iran, Pakistan,Egypt, Sudan,Algeria, China,
Indonesia, India, etc.
The reason for this is simple; the Western World (Europe and North America) has
collapsed. They cannot undertake a war. The local populations are entirely corrupt,
plunged in their syphilis of wealthy life, materialism, pan-sexualism, consumerism,
etc. Soldiers living in such societies cannot fight. When European soldiers fought for
last time, there were only few cabarets and bars in the capital cities of the European
countries. No discos, no malls, no cafes, no restaurants,no malls. For one restaurant
in Berlin or Paris in 1939, there are 100 restaurants now. The schools are different too
propagating vicious theories about transgender and other anomalies.
So, the Western countries need many proxies to fight against one another, so that US,
France, UK, Germany, etc.sell their arms and get things done due to killings and
proxy wars undertaken by stupid Muslims, Hindus, Ukrainians, Africans and

3. others. After 1989,therehas not been one true war worldwide. All the wars werefor the
benefit of US, EU, and NATO.
If Russia did not undertake thisoperation to saveUkraine, Kiev would not only
accommodate NATO military bases, but also pass legislation for homosexual marriages,
fornication, adoption of children by abnormal persons, transgender paranoia,and all this evil
stuff.
The splitting of Soviet Union and Russia is nothing new. General De Gaulle called for
a Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals. Remember?
https://ehne.fr/en/encyclopedia/themes/political-europe/arbiters-and-arbitration-
in-europe-beginning-modern-times/de-gaulle-and-europe
This plan provides for the division of Russia into 5-10 states. Of course, this has
nothing to do with all the silly literature about Human Rights, National
Independence, Democracy, etc.These states will become
- either warring factions put under control and containment (as in Libya or Yemen)
- or pseudo-states (like Ukraine) with due legislation about homosexuals,
transgender and all the anomalies.
For the destruction of Russia, the formation of Ukraine was a first step.
------------------------------------
3. THERE IS NO UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE OR NATION
Ukraine is not a nation. It never was.
Ukrainian is not a language but a dialect.
Read this English text:
In the seconds before impact, mortars whistle as they fall, making a loud and almost
plaintive sound Maxim Dondyuk will never forget. He will not forget the sting of
their shrapnel, which felt like a hot knife in his arm, or the sight of the women and
children he photographed during the shelling near Kyiv on March 6.
This is its Russian translation by Google:
За секунды до удара минометы свистят при падении, издавая громкий, почти
жалобный звук, который Максим Дондюк никогда не забудет. Он не забудет
жало их осколков, которое ощущалось как раскаленный нож в его руке, или
вид женщин и детей, которых он фотографировал во время обстрела под
Киевом 6 марта.
And this is its Ukrainian translation by Google:
За секунди до удару міномети свистять під час падіння, видаючи гучний і
майже жалібний звук, який Максим Дондюк ніколи не забуде. Він не забуде
жало їхніх осколків, які відчували, як розпечений ніж у його руці, ані погляд
жінок та дітей, яких він сфотографував під час обстрілу під Києвом 6 березня.
Just compare the characters!
You cannot read them, but you can compare and crosscheck the design.
Do it line by line! You will get your own idea.

4. By the way, try to find the term «Ukrainian nation» in any book, academic
publication, manual, review, encyclopedia, newspaperor magazine before 1950!!!
You will not find it.
Also, try to find the term «Ukrainian History» (or «History of Ukraine») in any book,
academic publication, manual, review, encyclopedia,newspaper or magazine before
1950!!!
You will not find it.
The reason is simple: there is no Ukrainian Nation and there is no History of
Ukraine.
Ukraine is the name of a land whereby Russians speak a different dialect. That is all.
The difference between Ukrainian and Russian is smaller than the difference
between
1. Hochdeutsch (South German) and Niederdeutsch (North German)
2. Italian and Sicilian
3. Modern Greek and Pontic region language
Ukraine is only a geographical term: just like people call one region in
Central Turkey «Cappadocia», anotherregion in Northern France «Normandy»,
another region in Greece «Epirus», and anotherregion in England «Cornwall».
No one can understand what Ukraine as a region is, before learning about the
Russian word «krai». It is an administrative division.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krai
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krais_of_the_Russian_Empire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krais_of_Russia
And the Russian name Ukraina means «frontier region».This cannotbe and by
definition is not the name of a ….. «nation».
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_of_Ukraine
To the aforementioned you have to add that in today’s Ukraine there are
- many who speak Russian (not the Ukrainian dialect)
and
- many who speak Ukrainian and Russian andconsider themselves as Russians.
Who are the rest?
Simply, those who speak Ukrainian and have been corrupted with bribes and politics
over the past 30 years. These people followed the Ukrainian politicians who were the
puppets of the US, EU and NATO during the period 1991-2021.
--------------------
4. THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF HISTORY
One must take into consideration an importanthistorical parameter:during the
1930s, there was terrible famine in Ukraine. But there was terrible famine throughout
the USSR. This was not a Russian / Ukrainian divide. All people suffered. Kazakhs and
Uzbeks too! And many others. It is called Holodomor («death through hunger»):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor and

5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor#Etymology
Also, during the 1930s, there was a terrible purge in Ukraine.
But again, purge took place throughout the USSR. Notably in Kazakhstan and the
rest of Central Asia. It was not a Russian/Ukrainian divide either.
The famine was the result of a catastrophic economic policy and the purge was the
decision of the Communist government and Stalin. But ………….
There is a «but»!
Because of what happened in the 1930s, many Ukrainians accepted happily and
wholeheartedly the German soldiers in 1941. There are millions of pictures that
illustrate this fact. I would say that at the time, more than 70% of the lands occupied
by the Nazis (in the territory of the USSR that they invaded) supported and even
actively helped the German soldiers. This does not mean that these populations were
Nazi! They were hating the Soviet regime so much that they would accept Muslims,
Mongols, Chinese — anyone!
But again, this is not a Ukrainian / Russian divide;many Russians welcomed the
German soldiers in Voronezh, Pskov and elsewhere.
The serious problem in this regard is the evil utilization of History and the biased use
of historical facts made by Western diplomats, academics, ‘advisers’, etc. in
Independent Ukraine after 1991. They pushed the Ukrainians to openly support
Nazism or rather Neo-Nazism -supposedly- in remembrance of their ancestors who
welcomed the Germans in 1941. But their ancestors, as I already told you, were not
Nazi; they were merely anti-Soviet.
That is all. This war will last long, because the Russians do not want to kill their
brothers. The Neo-Nazi Ukrainians, who are lost (and they know it), arrest simple
people and use them as «human shields». This was expected by top people in
Moscow. They knew what they would face.Plus, the Ukrainian fighters destroy
infrastructure deliberately, notably bridges. And never forget that Ukraine has many
rivers larger than the Nile! And, as you know, tanks are not fishing boats.
------------------------------------------------
5. IF UKRAINIANS ARE A NATION, THEN EGYPT’S SA’IDI ARE A NATION
TOO!
Now, how to summarize all this?
Making of the Ukrainians a …. «nation» is tantamount to
- saying that Bavarians and Pomeranians in Germany are two different nations
- considering the Nile Delta Egyptians and the Sa'idi (‫)صعيدى‬ as two different nations
or
- declaring that Kayseri Turks and Sivas Turks are two different nations.
But in this case, the US is a collection of 50 different states, and Texas has nothing to
do with New York, Los Angeles, and Florida.

6. ---------------------------------------------
I believe the above notes contain several key points in brief.
================================
Hélène Carrère d'Encausse - PICTURES