Multiple Effect Evaporation
Systems
• Feeding Methods, Vapour Recompression,
Fouling, Heat Recovery & More
• Presented by: [Your Name]
• Date: [Insert Date]
Introduction
• • Evaporation is used to concentrate liquids by
removing water.
• • Multiple Effect Evaporation (MEE) improves
energy efficiency.
• • Applications: dairy, food, pharmaceutical,
and chemical industries.
What is Multiple Effect
Evaporation?
• • A system where steam is reused in
successive evaporator stages.
• • Reduces steam consumption and energy
cost.
• • Operates under vacuum for lower boiling
points.
Types of Evaporation Systems
• • Single-effect evaporator
• • Multiple-effect evaporator:
• - Forward feed
• - Backward feed
• - Mixed feed
• • Used based on product nature and energy
requirements.
Feeding Method: Forward Feed
• • Simplest configuration
• • Feed enters at the first effect and moves to
the last.
• • Suitable for hot and less viscous feeds.
• • Lower pumping cost.
Feeding Method: Backward Feed
• • Feed enters from last effect to the first.
• • Good for cold and viscous materials.
• • Higher steam economy but increased
pumping cost.
Feeding Method: Mixed & Parallel
Feed
• • Combination of forward and backward feed.
• • Parallel feed: feed enters all effects
simultaneously.
• • Used in specific industrial conditions.
Importance of Feed Preheating
• • Reduces energy needed for evaporation.
• • Protects equipment from thermal stress.
• • Enhances efficiency of evaporation process.
Methods of Feed Preheating
• • Using vapour condensate from later effects.
• • Heat exchangers (plate, tubular)
• • Integration with waste heat recovery
systems.
Introduction to Vapour
Recompression
• • Reuses vapours from the evaporator.
• • Reduces fresh steam consumption.
• • Two main types: Mechanical (MVR) and
Thermal (TVR).
Mechanical Vapour Recompression
(MVR)
• • Uses compressor to compress vapour to
higher pressure.
• • High energy efficiency.
• • Initial cost is high but operational savings are
significant.
Thermal Vapour Recompression
(TVR)
• • Uses steam ejector to recompress vapour.
• • Less efficient than MVR but cheaper.
• • Common in dairy and food industries.
MVR vs TVR Comparison
• • MVR: High efficiency, high initial cost, low
maintenance.
• • TVR: Low cost, easy to operate, less efficient.
• • Choice depends on scale and application.
Fouling in Evaporators
• • Caused by scaling, biological growth, or
chemical reactions.
• • Reduces heat transfer efficiency.
• • Increases energy consumption and
downtime.
Fouling Prevention and Cleaning
• • Regular Cleaning-In-Place (CIP) systems.
• • Use of anti-scalants and controlled
operation.
• • Scheduled maintenance to ensure
performance.
Heat Recovery in Evaporation
• • Use of vapour from one effect to heat the
next.
• • Enhances overall thermal efficiency.
• • Integrated with feed preheating systems.
Mass Recovery Techniques
• • Condensate collection and reuse.
• • Flash steam recovery.
• • Reduces water and energy wastage.
Recovery System Integration
• • Automated control for optimized recovery.
• • Combines heat and mass recovery with feed
preheating.
• • Increases sustainability.
Why Use Vacuum Devices?
• • Reduces boiling point of liquids.
• • Saves energy.
• • Essential for heat-sensitive products.
Types of Vacuum Creating Devices
• • Steam jet ejectors
• • Liquid ring pumps
• • Mechanical vacuum pumps
Vacuum System Setup
• • Vacuum maintained across effects.
• • Interlocks with vapour recompression
systems.
• • Includes condensers and receivers.
Case Study: Dairy Industry
• • Milk concentration using MEE.
• • Energy savings with TVR.
• • CIP for fouling control.
Case Study: Chemical Industry
• • Used for salt and caustic soda concentration.
• • Critical for high purity and recovery.
• • Robust fouling management is key.
Efficiency Comparison
• • Graph showing steam savings.
• • MEE + MVR/TVR vs single-effect system.
• • Efficiency improvement up to 50–70%.
Conclusion
• • MEE is critical for energy-efficient
evaporation.
• • Recompression and recovery enhance
sustainability.
• • Proper design and maintenance reduce
operational costs.

Multiple_Effect_Evaporation_Systems_Presentation.pptx

  • 1.
    Multiple Effect Evaporation Systems •Feeding Methods, Vapour Recompression, Fouling, Heat Recovery & More • Presented by: [Your Name] • Date: [Insert Date]
  • 2.
    Introduction • • Evaporationis used to concentrate liquids by removing water. • • Multiple Effect Evaporation (MEE) improves energy efficiency. • • Applications: dairy, food, pharmaceutical, and chemical industries.
  • 3.
    What is MultipleEffect Evaporation? • • A system where steam is reused in successive evaporator stages. • • Reduces steam consumption and energy cost. • • Operates under vacuum for lower boiling points.
  • 4.
    Types of EvaporationSystems • • Single-effect evaporator • • Multiple-effect evaporator: • - Forward feed • - Backward feed • - Mixed feed • • Used based on product nature and energy requirements.
  • 5.
    Feeding Method: ForwardFeed • • Simplest configuration • • Feed enters at the first effect and moves to the last. • • Suitable for hot and less viscous feeds. • • Lower pumping cost.
  • 6.
    Feeding Method: BackwardFeed • • Feed enters from last effect to the first. • • Good for cold and viscous materials. • • Higher steam economy but increased pumping cost.
  • 7.
    Feeding Method: Mixed& Parallel Feed • • Combination of forward and backward feed. • • Parallel feed: feed enters all effects simultaneously. • • Used in specific industrial conditions.
  • 8.
    Importance of FeedPreheating • • Reduces energy needed for evaporation. • • Protects equipment from thermal stress. • • Enhances efficiency of evaporation process.
  • 9.
    Methods of FeedPreheating • • Using vapour condensate from later effects. • • Heat exchangers (plate, tubular) • • Integration with waste heat recovery systems.
  • 10.
    Introduction to Vapour Recompression •• Reuses vapours from the evaporator. • • Reduces fresh steam consumption. • • Two main types: Mechanical (MVR) and Thermal (TVR).
  • 11.
    Mechanical Vapour Recompression (MVR) •• Uses compressor to compress vapour to higher pressure. • • High energy efficiency. • • Initial cost is high but operational savings are significant.
  • 12.
    Thermal Vapour Recompression (TVR) •• Uses steam ejector to recompress vapour. • • Less efficient than MVR but cheaper. • • Common in dairy and food industries.
  • 13.
    MVR vs TVRComparison • • MVR: High efficiency, high initial cost, low maintenance. • • TVR: Low cost, easy to operate, less efficient. • • Choice depends on scale and application.
  • 14.
    Fouling in Evaporators •• Caused by scaling, biological growth, or chemical reactions. • • Reduces heat transfer efficiency. • • Increases energy consumption and downtime.
  • 15.
    Fouling Prevention andCleaning • • Regular Cleaning-In-Place (CIP) systems. • • Use of anti-scalants and controlled operation. • • Scheduled maintenance to ensure performance.
  • 16.
    Heat Recovery inEvaporation • • Use of vapour from one effect to heat the next. • • Enhances overall thermal efficiency. • • Integrated with feed preheating systems.
  • 17.
    Mass Recovery Techniques •• Condensate collection and reuse. • • Flash steam recovery. • • Reduces water and energy wastage.
  • 18.
    Recovery System Integration •• Automated control for optimized recovery. • • Combines heat and mass recovery with feed preheating. • • Increases sustainability.
  • 19.
    Why Use VacuumDevices? • • Reduces boiling point of liquids. • • Saves energy. • • Essential for heat-sensitive products.
  • 20.
    Types of VacuumCreating Devices • • Steam jet ejectors • • Liquid ring pumps • • Mechanical vacuum pumps
  • 21.
    Vacuum System Setup •• Vacuum maintained across effects. • • Interlocks with vapour recompression systems. • • Includes condensers and receivers.
  • 22.
    Case Study: DairyIndustry • • Milk concentration using MEE. • • Energy savings with TVR. • • CIP for fouling control.
  • 23.
    Case Study: ChemicalIndustry • • Used for salt and caustic soda concentration. • • Critical for high purity and recovery. • • Robust fouling management is key.
  • 24.
    Efficiency Comparison • •Graph showing steam savings. • • MEE + MVR/TVR vs single-effect system. • • Efficiency improvement up to 50–70%.
  • 25.
    Conclusion • • MEEis critical for energy-efficient evaporation. • • Recompression and recovery enhance sustainability. • • Proper design and maintenance reduce operational costs.