SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Consumer Perceptions of E-cigarettes: A Comparison of Smokers and Non-Smokers
in a Mechanical Turk Sample
Sebastian Bauhoff, PhD1
, Adrian Montero, MBA1
, & Deborah Scharf, PhD2
1
RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, USA; 2
RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Summary Methods Cont’d
Results
Disclosures: Dr. Bauhoff, Mr. Montero and Dr. Scharf did not receive funding for this project. They have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.
Background
E-cigarettes are gaining in popularity but consumers have incomplete
information about their potential risks. The FDA is planning to address
this informational need by extending its regulatory authority to e-
cigarettes. Information about public perceptions of e-cigarettes,
including their availability, cost, benefits and risks can enable FDA to
implement policies that effectively protect the public health. Examining
this information separately for smokers and non-smokers is particularly
important since prior tobacco product experience is expected to be
related to perceptions of and intentions to use e-cigarettes.
Given plans to extend its regulatory authority to e-cigarettes, the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) has
immediate need for information about how e-cigarettes are commonly
perceived. We used Mechanical Turk (Mturk), a “crowdsourcing” labor
market platform, to rapidly survey a large (n=797) sample of never
(56%) and ever smokers (44%), with (28%), and without (67%), e-
cigarette experience, about their perceptions of e-cigarettes. Data
suggests that many perceptions and beliefs about e-cigarettes are
widespread. However, smokers and non-smokers may have different
reasons for wanting to try or avoid e-cigarettes, and public health
messages addressing e-cigarette use may need to be tailored
separately to smokers and non-smokers.
Objective
To describe smokers’ and non-smokers’ perceptions of, and reasons for
trying and not trying e-cigarettes.
N= 797 participants
• 83% Caucasian
• 40% young adults (ages 25-34)
• 65% completed some college or a bachelor’s degree
• 44% had ever smoked traditional cigarettes
• 28% had ever tried e-cigarettes
Participants (95%) were widely aware of e-cigarettes.
Demographics and smoking items were from BRFSS.
Researchers developed qualitative codes for open-ended items
(why/why not try e-cigarettes). Ten percent of coded data were validated
and inter-rater reliability was high.
Figure 1. Participants learned about e-cigarettes mainly from the
internet, conversations and TV. Smokers were also likely to have
learned about e-cigarettes from advertising in stores.
Figure 2. Smokers reported that e-cigarettes were cheaper than cigarettes
on a cost-per-use basis. Non-smokers reported the opposite belief
(p<0.001).
Discussion
• Novel use of Mturk to quickly generate policy-relevant information about
e-cigarettes.
• Smokers and non-smokers may learn about e-cigarettes from different
sources, and they may form different opinions about their safety, cost,
desirability, and intentions for future use.
• Different public health messages, and outlets for those messages, may
be needed to effectively control e-cigarette use in populations of ever
and never smokers.
Methods
Participants were recruited from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (Mturk) in
March, 2014.
Mturk is a pre-packaged, integrated recruitment and compensation
system. It includes a large participant pool and tools to screen and filter
participants for individual studies.
MTurk users eligible for this study were adults aged 18-64 who
connected from a U.S.-based server.
Participants clicked on a link for a “Social Science Study” and provided
informed consent. They were paid $0.75 for a completed survey.
The study survey had 35 questions and took 10 minutes to complete.
Never Smoker Ever Smoker Total
E-Cigarettes
Never User 361 (81%) 88 (25%) 534 (67%)
Ever User 62 (14%) 253 (72%) 223 (28%)
Missing 23 (5%) 10 (3%) 40 (5%)
Total 446 (100%) 351 (100%) 797 (100%)
*Percentages are for columns
Table 1. Ever smokers (72%) were more likely than never smokers
(14%) to have tried e-cigarettes (p<0.001).
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Nonsmoker
Smoker
Cheaper About the same More expensive
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Nonsmoker
Smoker
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Nonsmoker
Smoker
Figure 3. Smokers were more likely than non-smokers to report that e-
cigarettes help with quitting smoking (p<0.01).
• Among never users of e-cigarettes, ever smokers were
more likely than never smokers to report intentions to try
e-cigarettes (42% vs. 7%; p<0.01)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Nonsmoker
Smoker
Figure 4. Top 5 reasons for trying e-cigarettes: Smokers would try for help
with cessation and non-smokers would try out of curiosity.
Figure 5. Top 5 reasons for NOT trying e-cigarettes: Smokers had concerns
about expense and safety; non-smokers said that they did not want to smoke.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Nonsmoker
Smoker

More Related Content

What's hot

Clive Bates presentation at TMA 2015
Clive Bates presentation at TMA 2015Clive Bates presentation at TMA 2015
Clive Bates presentation at TMA 2015
Clive Bates
 
FDLI - Lesson for the US from other jurisdictions - the United Kingdom -29 Oc...
FDLI - Lesson for the US from other jurisdictions - the United Kingdom -29 Oc...FDLI - Lesson for the US from other jurisdictions - the United Kingdom -29 Oc...
FDLI - Lesson for the US from other jurisdictions - the United Kingdom -29 Oc...
Clive Bates
 
The MRTP process - Seven provocations - FDLI webinar 30 July 2020
The MRTP process - Seven provocations - FDLI webinar 30 July 2020The MRTP process - Seven provocations - FDLI webinar 30 July 2020
The MRTP process - Seven provocations - FDLI webinar 30 July 2020
Clive Bates
 
E-cigarettes: pros, cons and controversy
E-cigarettes: pros, cons and controversy E-cigarettes: pros, cons and controversy
E-cigarettes: pros, cons and controversy
Laura-Jane Smith
 
Global Forum on Nicotine 2016: What would good regulation look like
Global Forum on Nicotine 2016: What would good regulation look likeGlobal Forum on Nicotine 2016: What would good regulation look like
Global Forum on Nicotine 2016: What would good regulation look like
Clive Bates
 
Harm reduction - six insights
Harm reduction - six insightsHarm reduction - six insights
Harm reduction - six insights
Clive Bates
 
Tobacco harm reduction in the UK: e-cigarettes (EC) are making a difference
Tobacco harm reduction in the UK: e-cigarettes (EC) are making a differenceTobacco harm reduction in the UK: e-cigarettes (EC) are making a difference
Tobacco harm reduction in the UK: e-cigarettes (EC) are making a difference
Clive Bates
 
Tobacco Harm Reduction - an introduction
Tobacco Harm Reduction - an introductionTobacco Harm Reduction - an introduction
Tobacco Harm Reduction - an introduction
Clive Bates
 
The Endgame Revisited - US E-cigarette Summit 2021
The Endgame Revisited - US E-cigarette Summit 2021The Endgame Revisited - US E-cigarette Summit 2021
The Endgame Revisited - US E-cigarette Summit 2021
Clive Bates
 
Innovation for Consumers: E-cigarettes and novel tobacco products - Part of t...
Innovation for Consumers: E-cigarettes and novel tobacco products - Part of t...Innovation for Consumers: E-cigarettes and novel tobacco products - Part of t...
Innovation for Consumers: E-cigarettes and novel tobacco products - Part of t...
Clive Bates
 
Prohibition or profit motive: competing visions for the endgame
Prohibition or profit motive: competing visions for the endgameProhibition or profit motive: competing visions for the endgame
Prohibition or profit motive: competing visions for the endgameClive Bates
 
Wells Fargo 2013
Wells Fargo 2013 Wells Fargo 2013
Wells Fargo 2013 Clive Bates
 
Regulation: why less is more... E-cigarette Summit 12 November 2013 - Clive B...
Regulation: why less is more... E-cigarette Summit 12 November 2013 - Clive B...Regulation: why less is more... E-cigarette Summit 12 November 2013 - Clive B...
Regulation: why less is more... E-cigarette Summit 12 November 2013 - Clive B...
Clive Bates
 
Nicotina - Reducción de riesgos y daños / Nicotine - Risk and Harm Reduction
Nicotina - Reducción de riesgos y daños / Nicotine - Risk and Harm ReductionNicotina - Reducción de riesgos y daños / Nicotine - Risk and Harm Reduction
Nicotina - Reducción de riesgos y daños / Nicotine - Risk and Harm Reduction
Clive Bates
 
Science based policy or policy based science?
Science based policy or policy based science?Science based policy or policy based science?
Science based policy or policy based science?
Clive Bates
 
Asia House - Six insights into tobacco harm reduction
Asia House - Six insights into tobacco harm reductionAsia House - Six insights into tobacco harm reduction
Asia House - Six insights into tobacco harm reduction
Clive Bates
 
Vaping and tobacco: six things you need to know about harm reduction
Vaping and tobacco:  six things you need to know about harm reductionVaping and tobacco:  six things you need to know about harm reduction
Vaping and tobacco: six things you need to know about harm reduction
Clive Bates
 
Seven insights into tobacco harm reduction
Seven insights into tobacco harm reductionSeven insights into tobacco harm reduction
Seven insights into tobacco harm reduction
Clive Bates
 
Is nicotine reduction a viable policy for tobacco control? No, Definitely not...
Is nicotine reduction a viable policy for tobacco control? No, Definitely not...Is nicotine reduction a viable policy for tobacco control? No, Definitely not...
Is nicotine reduction a viable policy for tobacco control? No, Definitely not...
Clive Bates
 
The case of nicotine
The case of nicotineThe case of nicotine
The case of nicotine
Georgi Daskalov
 

What's hot (20)

Clive Bates presentation at TMA 2015
Clive Bates presentation at TMA 2015Clive Bates presentation at TMA 2015
Clive Bates presentation at TMA 2015
 
FDLI - Lesson for the US from other jurisdictions - the United Kingdom -29 Oc...
FDLI - Lesson for the US from other jurisdictions - the United Kingdom -29 Oc...FDLI - Lesson for the US from other jurisdictions - the United Kingdom -29 Oc...
FDLI - Lesson for the US from other jurisdictions - the United Kingdom -29 Oc...
 
The MRTP process - Seven provocations - FDLI webinar 30 July 2020
The MRTP process - Seven provocations - FDLI webinar 30 July 2020The MRTP process - Seven provocations - FDLI webinar 30 July 2020
The MRTP process - Seven provocations - FDLI webinar 30 July 2020
 
E-cigarettes: pros, cons and controversy
E-cigarettes: pros, cons and controversy E-cigarettes: pros, cons and controversy
E-cigarettes: pros, cons and controversy
 
Global Forum on Nicotine 2016: What would good regulation look like
Global Forum on Nicotine 2016: What would good regulation look likeGlobal Forum on Nicotine 2016: What would good regulation look like
Global Forum on Nicotine 2016: What would good regulation look like
 
Harm reduction - six insights
Harm reduction - six insightsHarm reduction - six insights
Harm reduction - six insights
 
Tobacco harm reduction in the UK: e-cigarettes (EC) are making a difference
Tobacco harm reduction in the UK: e-cigarettes (EC) are making a differenceTobacco harm reduction in the UK: e-cigarettes (EC) are making a difference
Tobacco harm reduction in the UK: e-cigarettes (EC) are making a difference
 
Tobacco Harm Reduction - an introduction
Tobacco Harm Reduction - an introductionTobacco Harm Reduction - an introduction
Tobacco Harm Reduction - an introduction
 
The Endgame Revisited - US E-cigarette Summit 2021
The Endgame Revisited - US E-cigarette Summit 2021The Endgame Revisited - US E-cigarette Summit 2021
The Endgame Revisited - US E-cigarette Summit 2021
 
Innovation for Consumers: E-cigarettes and novel tobacco products - Part of t...
Innovation for Consumers: E-cigarettes and novel tobacco products - Part of t...Innovation for Consumers: E-cigarettes and novel tobacco products - Part of t...
Innovation for Consumers: E-cigarettes and novel tobacco products - Part of t...
 
Prohibition or profit motive: competing visions for the endgame
Prohibition or profit motive: competing visions for the endgameProhibition or profit motive: competing visions for the endgame
Prohibition or profit motive: competing visions for the endgame
 
Wells Fargo 2013
Wells Fargo 2013 Wells Fargo 2013
Wells Fargo 2013
 
Regulation: why less is more... E-cigarette Summit 12 November 2013 - Clive B...
Regulation: why less is more... E-cigarette Summit 12 November 2013 - Clive B...Regulation: why less is more... E-cigarette Summit 12 November 2013 - Clive B...
Regulation: why less is more... E-cigarette Summit 12 November 2013 - Clive B...
 
Nicotina - Reducción de riesgos y daños / Nicotine - Risk and Harm Reduction
Nicotina - Reducción de riesgos y daños / Nicotine - Risk and Harm ReductionNicotina - Reducción de riesgos y daños / Nicotine - Risk and Harm Reduction
Nicotina - Reducción de riesgos y daños / Nicotine - Risk and Harm Reduction
 
Science based policy or policy based science?
Science based policy or policy based science?Science based policy or policy based science?
Science based policy or policy based science?
 
Asia House - Six insights into tobacco harm reduction
Asia House - Six insights into tobacco harm reductionAsia House - Six insights into tobacco harm reduction
Asia House - Six insights into tobacco harm reduction
 
Vaping and tobacco: six things you need to know about harm reduction
Vaping and tobacco:  six things you need to know about harm reductionVaping and tobacco:  six things you need to know about harm reduction
Vaping and tobacco: six things you need to know about harm reduction
 
Seven insights into tobacco harm reduction
Seven insights into tobacco harm reductionSeven insights into tobacco harm reduction
Seven insights into tobacco harm reduction
 
Is nicotine reduction a viable policy for tobacco control? No, Definitely not...
Is nicotine reduction a viable policy for tobacco control? No, Definitely not...Is nicotine reduction a viable policy for tobacco control? No, Definitely not...
Is nicotine reduction a viable policy for tobacco control? No, Definitely not...
 
The case of nicotine
The case of nicotineThe case of nicotine
The case of nicotine
 

Viewers also liked

Mechanical Turk is Not Anonymous
Mechanical Turk is Not AnonymousMechanical Turk is Not Anonymous
Mechanical Turk is Not Anonymous
Matthew Lease
 
Ordinary Influencers on Twitter
Ordinary Influencers on TwitterOrdinary Influencers on Twitter
Ordinary Influencers on TwitterWinter Mason
 
Crowdsourcing for Online Data Collection
Crowdsourcing for Online Data CollectionCrowdsourcing for Online Data Collection
Crowdsourcing for Online Data Collection
Winter Mason
 
Tutorial on Using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) for HCI Research
Tutorial on Using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) for HCI ResearchTutorial on Using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) for HCI Research
Tutorial on Using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) for HCI Research
Ed Chi
 
Hands On: Amazon Mechanical Turk - M. Acosta - ESWC SS 2014
Hands On: Amazon Mechanical Turk - M. Acosta - ESWC SS 2014 Hands On: Amazon Mechanical Turk - M. Acosta - ESWC SS 2014
Hands On: Amazon Mechanical Turk - M. Acosta - ESWC SS 2014 eswcsummerschool
 
MTurk > Machine Learning
MTurk > Machine LearningMTurk > Machine Learning
MTurk > Machine Learning
Polyvore
 

Viewers also liked (6)

Mechanical Turk is Not Anonymous
Mechanical Turk is Not AnonymousMechanical Turk is Not Anonymous
Mechanical Turk is Not Anonymous
 
Ordinary Influencers on Twitter
Ordinary Influencers on TwitterOrdinary Influencers on Twitter
Ordinary Influencers on Twitter
 
Crowdsourcing for Online Data Collection
Crowdsourcing for Online Data CollectionCrowdsourcing for Online Data Collection
Crowdsourcing for Online Data Collection
 
Tutorial on Using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) for HCI Research
Tutorial on Using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) for HCI ResearchTutorial on Using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) for HCI Research
Tutorial on Using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) for HCI Research
 
Hands On: Amazon Mechanical Turk - M. Acosta - ESWC SS 2014
Hands On: Amazon Mechanical Turk - M. Acosta - ESWC SS 2014 Hands On: Amazon Mechanical Turk - M. Acosta - ESWC SS 2014
Hands On: Amazon Mechanical Turk - M. Acosta - ESWC SS 2014
 
MTurk > Machine Learning
MTurk > Machine LearningMTurk > Machine Learning
MTurk > Machine Learning
 

Similar to mturk ecig poster 18FEB15_final

SARET ePoster William KangHyun Keem 2014 ds edits
SARET ePoster William KangHyun Keem 2014 ds editsSARET ePoster William KangHyun Keem 2014 ds edits
SARET ePoster William KangHyun Keem 2014 ds editsWilliam KangHyun Keem
 
Dual Users and Electronic Cigarette Only Users: Consumption and Characteristics
Dual Users and Electronic Cigarette Only Users: Consumption and CharacteristicsDual Users and Electronic Cigarette Only Users: Consumption and Characteristics
Dual Users and Electronic Cigarette Only Users: Consumption and Characteristics
Healthcare and Medical Sciences
 
108Electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes,” are de-vi.docx
108Electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes,” are de-vi.docx108Electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes,” are de-vi.docx
108Electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes,” are de-vi.docx
hyacinthshackley2629
 
Society for research on nicotine and tobacco conference abstracts srnt 2014
Society for research on nicotine and tobacco conference abstracts srnt 2014Society for research on nicotine and tobacco conference abstracts srnt 2014
Society for research on nicotine and tobacco conference abstracts srnt 2014
Georgi Daskalov
 
How Science becomes Policy - presentation
How Science becomes Policy - presentationHow Science becomes Policy - presentation
How Science becomes Policy - presentation
jeanmdavidson
 
Parrish Medical Center | survey finds support for banning e cigarettes for kids
Parrish Medical Center | survey finds support for banning e cigarettes for kidsParrish Medical Center | survey finds support for banning e cigarettes for kids
Parrish Medical Center | survey finds support for banning e cigarettes for kids
Parrish_Medical_Center
 
Ott conf 2014-summaryreport
Ott conf 2014-summaryreportOtt conf 2014-summaryreport
Ott conf 2014-summaryreport
Georgi Daskalov
 
Centro Healthcare Category
Centro Healthcare Category Centro Healthcare Category
Centro Healthcare Category
Centro
 
Marketing in the Age of Person-centric Healthcare
Marketing in the Age of Person-centric HealthcareMarketing in the Age of Person-centric Healthcare
Marketing in the Age of Person-centric Healthcare
Ogilvy Consulting
 
Len 6 gorman thau
Len 6 gorman thauLen 6 gorman thau
Len 6 gorman thau
OPUNITE
 
E cigarettes: Health promotion and petition
E cigarettes: Health promotion and petitionE cigarettes: Health promotion and petition
E cigarettes: Health promotion and petition
Hà Linh Quách
 
A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowl...
A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowl...A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowl...
A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowl...
ijtsrd
 
Patient Compliance Report 2013
Patient Compliance Report 2013Patient Compliance Report 2013
Patient Compliance Report 2013
Joshua Spiegel
 
Sam dc-1-2
Sam dc-1-2Sam dc-1-2
Sam dc-1-2
dcuniversegirl
 
Why is FDA regulation such a mess
Why is FDA regulation such a messWhy is FDA regulation such a mess
Why is FDA regulation such a mess
Clive Bates
 
21 5778 pf1(m)-e(c)_f(t)_pf1(puh)_pfa(pr_p)_pf2(bo_pvp)
21  5778 pf1(m)-e(c)_f(t)_pf1(puh)_pfa(pr_p)_pf2(bo_pvp)21  5778 pf1(m)-e(c)_f(t)_pf1(puh)_pfa(pr_p)_pf2(bo_pvp)
21 5778 pf1(m)-e(c)_f(t)_pf1(puh)_pfa(pr_p)_pf2(bo_pvp)Mohammed Alshakka
 

Similar to mturk ecig poster 18FEB15_final (20)

SARET ePoster William KangHyun Keem 2014 ds edits
SARET ePoster William KangHyun Keem 2014 ds editsSARET ePoster William KangHyun Keem 2014 ds edits
SARET ePoster William KangHyun Keem 2014 ds edits
 
Dual Users and Electronic Cigarette Only Users: Consumption and Characteristics
Dual Users and Electronic Cigarette Only Users: Consumption and CharacteristicsDual Users and Electronic Cigarette Only Users: Consumption and Characteristics
Dual Users and Electronic Cigarette Only Users: Consumption and Characteristics
 
Special Project Abstract
Special Project AbstractSpecial Project Abstract
Special Project Abstract
 
108Electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes,” are de-vi.docx
108Electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes,” are de-vi.docx108Electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes,” are de-vi.docx
108Electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes,” are de-vi.docx
 
Society for research on nicotine and tobacco conference abstracts srnt 2014
Society for research on nicotine and tobacco conference abstracts srnt 2014Society for research on nicotine and tobacco conference abstracts srnt 2014
Society for research on nicotine and tobacco conference abstracts srnt 2014
 
How Science becomes Policy - presentation
How Science becomes Policy - presentationHow Science becomes Policy - presentation
How Science becomes Policy - presentation
 
Parrish Medical Center | survey finds support for banning e cigarettes for kids
Parrish Medical Center | survey finds support for banning e cigarettes for kidsParrish Medical Center | survey finds support for banning e cigarettes for kids
Parrish Medical Center | survey finds support for banning e cigarettes for kids
 
Ott conf 2014-summaryreport
Ott conf 2014-summaryreportOtt conf 2014-summaryreport
Ott conf 2014-summaryreport
 
Centro Healthcare Category
Centro Healthcare Category Centro Healthcare Category
Centro Healthcare Category
 
Final MPH Project Paper-1
Final MPH Project Paper-1Final MPH Project Paper-1
Final MPH Project Paper-1
 
Marketing in the Age of Person-centric Healthcare
Marketing in the Age of Person-centric HealthcareMarketing in the Age of Person-centric Healthcare
Marketing in the Age of Person-centric Healthcare
 
Len 6 gorman thau
Len 6 gorman thauLen 6 gorman thau
Len 6 gorman thau
 
E cigarettes: Health promotion and petition
E cigarettes: Health promotion and petitionE cigarettes: Health promotion and petition
E cigarettes: Health promotion and petition
 
PIIS0140673611607010
PIIS0140673611607010PIIS0140673611607010
PIIS0140673611607010
 
A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowl...
A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowl...A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowl...
A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowl...
 
Patient Compliance Report 2013
Patient Compliance Report 2013Patient Compliance Report 2013
Patient Compliance Report 2013
 
Sam dc-1-2
Sam dc-1-2Sam dc-1-2
Sam dc-1-2
 
The viability of technology-based smoking cessation programs in developing co...
The viability of technology-based smoking cessation programs in developing co...The viability of technology-based smoking cessation programs in developing co...
The viability of technology-based smoking cessation programs in developing co...
 
Why is FDA regulation such a mess
Why is FDA regulation such a messWhy is FDA regulation such a mess
Why is FDA regulation such a mess
 
21 5778 pf1(m)-e(c)_f(t)_pf1(puh)_pfa(pr_p)_pf2(bo_pvp)
21  5778 pf1(m)-e(c)_f(t)_pf1(puh)_pfa(pr_p)_pf2(bo_pvp)21  5778 pf1(m)-e(c)_f(t)_pf1(puh)_pfa(pr_p)_pf2(bo_pvp)
21 5778 pf1(m)-e(c)_f(t)_pf1(puh)_pfa(pr_p)_pf2(bo_pvp)
 

mturk ecig poster 18FEB15_final

  • 1. Consumer Perceptions of E-cigarettes: A Comparison of Smokers and Non-Smokers in a Mechanical Turk Sample Sebastian Bauhoff, PhD1 , Adrian Montero, MBA1 , & Deborah Scharf, PhD2 1 RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, USA; 2 RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Summary Methods Cont’d Results Disclosures: Dr. Bauhoff, Mr. Montero and Dr. Scharf did not receive funding for this project. They have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose. Background E-cigarettes are gaining in popularity but consumers have incomplete information about their potential risks. The FDA is planning to address this informational need by extending its regulatory authority to e- cigarettes. Information about public perceptions of e-cigarettes, including their availability, cost, benefits and risks can enable FDA to implement policies that effectively protect the public health. Examining this information separately for smokers and non-smokers is particularly important since prior tobacco product experience is expected to be related to perceptions of and intentions to use e-cigarettes. Given plans to extend its regulatory authority to e-cigarettes, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) has immediate need for information about how e-cigarettes are commonly perceived. We used Mechanical Turk (Mturk), a “crowdsourcing” labor market platform, to rapidly survey a large (n=797) sample of never (56%) and ever smokers (44%), with (28%), and without (67%), e- cigarette experience, about their perceptions of e-cigarettes. Data suggests that many perceptions and beliefs about e-cigarettes are widespread. However, smokers and non-smokers may have different reasons for wanting to try or avoid e-cigarettes, and public health messages addressing e-cigarette use may need to be tailored separately to smokers and non-smokers. Objective To describe smokers’ and non-smokers’ perceptions of, and reasons for trying and not trying e-cigarettes. N= 797 participants • 83% Caucasian • 40% young adults (ages 25-34) • 65% completed some college or a bachelor’s degree • 44% had ever smoked traditional cigarettes • 28% had ever tried e-cigarettes Participants (95%) were widely aware of e-cigarettes. Demographics and smoking items were from BRFSS. Researchers developed qualitative codes for open-ended items (why/why not try e-cigarettes). Ten percent of coded data were validated and inter-rater reliability was high. Figure 1. Participants learned about e-cigarettes mainly from the internet, conversations and TV. Smokers were also likely to have learned about e-cigarettes from advertising in stores. Figure 2. Smokers reported that e-cigarettes were cheaper than cigarettes on a cost-per-use basis. Non-smokers reported the opposite belief (p<0.001). Discussion • Novel use of Mturk to quickly generate policy-relevant information about e-cigarettes. • Smokers and non-smokers may learn about e-cigarettes from different sources, and they may form different opinions about their safety, cost, desirability, and intentions for future use. • Different public health messages, and outlets for those messages, may be needed to effectively control e-cigarette use in populations of ever and never smokers. Methods Participants were recruited from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (Mturk) in March, 2014. Mturk is a pre-packaged, integrated recruitment and compensation system. It includes a large participant pool and tools to screen and filter participants for individual studies. MTurk users eligible for this study were adults aged 18-64 who connected from a U.S.-based server. Participants clicked on a link for a “Social Science Study” and provided informed consent. They were paid $0.75 for a completed survey. The study survey had 35 questions and took 10 minutes to complete. Never Smoker Ever Smoker Total E-Cigarettes Never User 361 (81%) 88 (25%) 534 (67%) Ever User 62 (14%) 253 (72%) 223 (28%) Missing 23 (5%) 10 (3%) 40 (5%) Total 446 (100%) 351 (100%) 797 (100%) *Percentages are for columns Table 1. Ever smokers (72%) were more likely than never smokers (14%) to have tried e-cigarettes (p<0.001). 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Nonsmoker Smoker Cheaper About the same More expensive 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Nonsmoker Smoker 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Nonsmoker Smoker Figure 3. Smokers were more likely than non-smokers to report that e- cigarettes help with quitting smoking (p<0.01). • Among never users of e-cigarettes, ever smokers were more likely than never smokers to report intentions to try e-cigarettes (42% vs. 7%; p<0.01) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Nonsmoker Smoker Figure 4. Top 5 reasons for trying e-cigarettes: Smokers would try for help with cessation and non-smokers would try out of curiosity. Figure 5. Top 5 reasons for NOT trying e-cigarettes: Smokers had concerns about expense and safety; non-smokers said that they did not want to smoke. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Nonsmoker Smoker