MSFT RTB Case
gemiusHU 2015Q1
www.gemius.hu
MS Case – Brief
• Brand: Microsoft
• Brief:
– MS made a cooperation with their retailers. MS
paid for the campaign but the landing where you
could buy the products were at retailers’ shop
– Shops should agree to put codes into their sites
and pass back the value of the conversions
• Main challenge:
– MS had more than 10 partners but around
minimal budget / month
MS Case – Mechanism
If somebody clicked on a banner he arrived to a matched designed but common landing
page. Then he could move to retailers’ shop to buy the products. Later we missed this
common landing and performance went higher.
Banner 1
Banner 2
Banner X
Landing 1
Landing 2
Landing X
Partner 1
Partner 2
Partner X
Thank you!
Thank you!
Thank you!
Banners MS landing
Partner
sites
Thank you
pages
MS Case – Solution
1. Money should split equallybetween shops
2. Products and prices were same for all shops
3. In DataXu system it’s not allowed more than 3 banner sets for one tacticto rotate
Because of reason #3 and #1 we rotated the banners in gemiusDirectEffect (gDE) not DataXu. And because of
the budget limitation and reason #2 we shouldn’t serve the same banner for retargeting. It was enough just
serve any of them. We could rotate banners for retargeting in gDE as well so there were just two tactics in
DataXu: one prospecting and one retargeting. That’s how we could reserve some money and we could solve this
campaign from the briefed budget.
Shop 1
Shop 2
Shop X
Retar-
geting
Pros-
pecting
…
MS Case – Result
• Overall CPA was 7 times less than the
expectation
• ROI was positive (value of purchased goods
was much higher than the investment)
• In this way we could serve a more then 10
partners campaign for the same, low budget
• Good learning was that whatever banner
people saw the most sales realized on the
best known e-shop
Thank you!
www.gemius.hu
Ambruszter Géza
Country Manager
+36 20 221 8939
Gemius Hungary
Budapest
Szép utca 5.

Gemius Hungary: MSFT RTB case

  • 1.
    MSFT RTB Case gemiusHU2015Q1 www.gemius.hu
  • 2.
    MS Case –Brief • Brand: Microsoft • Brief: – MS made a cooperation with their retailers. MS paid for the campaign but the landing where you could buy the products were at retailers’ shop – Shops should agree to put codes into their sites and pass back the value of the conversions • Main challenge: – MS had more than 10 partners but around minimal budget / month
  • 3.
    MS Case –Mechanism If somebody clicked on a banner he arrived to a matched designed but common landing page. Then he could move to retailers’ shop to buy the products. Later we missed this common landing and performance went higher. Banner 1 Banner 2 Banner X Landing 1 Landing 2 Landing X Partner 1 Partner 2 Partner X Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Banners MS landing Partner sites Thank you pages
  • 4.
    MS Case –Solution 1. Money should split equallybetween shops 2. Products and prices were same for all shops 3. In DataXu system it’s not allowed more than 3 banner sets for one tacticto rotate Because of reason #3 and #1 we rotated the banners in gemiusDirectEffect (gDE) not DataXu. And because of the budget limitation and reason #2 we shouldn’t serve the same banner for retargeting. It was enough just serve any of them. We could rotate banners for retargeting in gDE as well so there were just two tactics in DataXu: one prospecting and one retargeting. That’s how we could reserve some money and we could solve this campaign from the briefed budget. Shop 1 Shop 2 Shop X Retar- geting Pros- pecting …
  • 5.
    MS Case –Result • Overall CPA was 7 times less than the expectation • ROI was positive (value of purchased goods was much higher than the investment) • In this way we could serve a more then 10 partners campaign for the same, low budget • Good learning was that whatever banner people saw the most sales realized on the best known e-shop
  • 6.
    Thank you! www.gemius.hu Ambruszter Géza CountryManager +36 20 221 8939 Gemius Hungary Budapest Szép utca 5.