Mp hc order nov 3
•
0 likes•39 views
Kausal Singh Masram filed an application for anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered under sections 292 of IPC and 67 of IT Act for posting a vulgar photograph of a reputed Indian leader on social media. The court notes that the applicant tagged 28 people and the post received 35 likes and 9 comments, indicating he was aware of the post. The applicant's complaint about the misuse of his ID was filed over two months later and during the bail application, so it cannot be believed. Given the applicant's act, the court finds he is not entitled to anticipatory bail and dismisses his application.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
CIC ORDER AGAINST DELHI STATE LEGAL SERVISCE AUTHORITY DATED 25 SEPTEMBER 2014
1) The appellant filed an RTI application seeking information about the action taken on his complaints from Delhi State Legal Services Authority.
2) The PIO provided a partial response which did not satisfy the appellant. He filed first and second appeals.
3) The Information Commissioner directed the PIO to provide information to the appellant within 3 weeks on the specific actions taken on his complaints from February and May 2012.
Madras hc cbi judgment
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to transfer the investigation of a case involving the collection of around Rs. 300 crores in deposits by a company to the CBI. The court noted that the case is currently being investigated by the Economic Offences Wing and that the investigation is progressing well with movable properties seized and 19 immovable properties identified based on confession statements. While there is usually a demand for CBI investigation, transferring the case now would adversely affect the ongoing investigation. The court thus denied the petitioner's request and hopes the Economic Offences Wing will attach properties and file a charge sheet swiftly.
Madras hc march 1 order
This order summarizes a criminal case in the Madras High Court. The petitioner, S. Devika, filed a criminal original petition to quash proceedings against her in case C.C.No.760 of 2020 before the IX Metropolitan Magistrate's Court in Saidapet, Chennai. The High Court allowed the petition, noting that no offense had been made out against the petitioner based on precedents. It also noted that the government had decided to withdraw all cases registered against those protesting the Citizenship Amendment Act. Therefore, the High Court quashed the proceedings in case C.C.No.760 of 2020, as continuing it would serve no useful purpose.
15656 of 2020
The document summarizes a court case regarding a complaint filed against individuals who depicted the Indian national flag on a cake at a Christmas celebration event.
1) The complainant felt depicting the flag on a cake that was later cut and consumed amounted to insulting the national flag, which is an offense under Indian law. However, police initially refused to file an FIR.
2) The complainant then filed a petition with a judicial magistrate seeking an order directing police to file an FIR. The magistrate took cognizance of the complaint but then improperly reverted to using powers under a different section of criminal law to direct police to investigate.
3) The court hearing the challenge to the magistrate's order found that once cogniz
RTI dated 22-03-2020 against Supreme Court of India
Opposite Parties in M.A. 583/2020 in W.P.(Criminal) are CORRUPT JUDGES, ADVOCATES and POLICE.
Biased Mentioning Officer of Supreme Court of India allowing Civil matters for listing during COVID 19 and Criminal matters are NOT CONSIDERED as URGENT MATTER
Sc payal tadvi
The document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case involving three doctors, Ankita Khandelwal, Hema Ahuja, and Bhakti Mehare, who were accused of abetting the suicide of their junior colleague Payal Tadvi. It describes how Tadvi committed suicide in May 2019 after facing alleged harassment and ragging by the three appellants. The appellants were granted bail by the Bombay High Court subject to certain conditions, including restrictions on entering the medical college/hospital. The appellants then appealed to the Supreme Court seeking relaxation of some bail conditions. The summary provides background on the case and appeals.
Madras hc madurai bench order
This document is a court order from the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court regarding a writ petition filed by the petitioner Santhosh. The petitioner's younger brother Ramesh was taken into police custody and found dead the next day, with the police claiming it was suicide. The petitioner alleged Ramesh was tortured by police and died as a result. The court ordered a second autopsy, which was conducted. The court then directed that the investigation be transferred from the local police to the CBCID due to allegations against the local police. The court also issued directions for strict compliance in cases of custodial deaths, such as requiring video recording of full autopsies adhering to established forensic standards.
TN Police Constable Result 2017 Check Tamil Nadu TN Police Merit List Soon
TNUSRB Result 2017. Tamil Nadu Police Exam Result 2017 will be declared by the TNUSRB as soon as possible on the official website of Tamil Nadu Police Recruitment Board.
Recommended
CIC ORDER AGAINST DELHI STATE LEGAL SERVISCE AUTHORITY DATED 25 SEPTEMBER 2014
1) The appellant filed an RTI application seeking information about the action taken on his complaints from Delhi State Legal Services Authority.
2) The PIO provided a partial response which did not satisfy the appellant. He filed first and second appeals.
3) The Information Commissioner directed the PIO to provide information to the appellant within 3 weeks on the specific actions taken on his complaints from February and May 2012.
Madras hc cbi judgment
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to transfer the investigation of a case involving the collection of around Rs. 300 crores in deposits by a company to the CBI. The court noted that the case is currently being investigated by the Economic Offences Wing and that the investigation is progressing well with movable properties seized and 19 immovable properties identified based on confession statements. While there is usually a demand for CBI investigation, transferring the case now would adversely affect the ongoing investigation. The court thus denied the petitioner's request and hopes the Economic Offences Wing will attach properties and file a charge sheet swiftly.
Madras hc march 1 order
This order summarizes a criminal case in the Madras High Court. The petitioner, S. Devika, filed a criminal original petition to quash proceedings against her in case C.C.No.760 of 2020 before the IX Metropolitan Magistrate's Court in Saidapet, Chennai. The High Court allowed the petition, noting that no offense had been made out against the petitioner based on precedents. It also noted that the government had decided to withdraw all cases registered against those protesting the Citizenship Amendment Act. Therefore, the High Court quashed the proceedings in case C.C.No.760 of 2020, as continuing it would serve no useful purpose.
15656 of 2020
The document summarizes a court case regarding a complaint filed against individuals who depicted the Indian national flag on a cake at a Christmas celebration event.
1) The complainant felt depicting the flag on a cake that was later cut and consumed amounted to insulting the national flag, which is an offense under Indian law. However, police initially refused to file an FIR.
2) The complainant then filed a petition with a judicial magistrate seeking an order directing police to file an FIR. The magistrate took cognizance of the complaint but then improperly reverted to using powers under a different section of criminal law to direct police to investigate.
3) The court hearing the challenge to the magistrate's order found that once cogniz
RTI dated 22-03-2020 against Supreme Court of India
Opposite Parties in M.A. 583/2020 in W.P.(Criminal) are CORRUPT JUDGES, ADVOCATES and POLICE.
Biased Mentioning Officer of Supreme Court of India allowing Civil matters for listing during COVID 19 and Criminal matters are NOT CONSIDERED as URGENT MATTER
Sc payal tadvi
The document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case involving three doctors, Ankita Khandelwal, Hema Ahuja, and Bhakti Mehare, who were accused of abetting the suicide of their junior colleague Payal Tadvi. It describes how Tadvi committed suicide in May 2019 after facing alleged harassment and ragging by the three appellants. The appellants were granted bail by the Bombay High Court subject to certain conditions, including restrictions on entering the medical college/hospital. The appellants then appealed to the Supreme Court seeking relaxation of some bail conditions. The summary provides background on the case and appeals.
Madras hc madurai bench order
This document is a court order from the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court regarding a writ petition filed by the petitioner Santhosh. The petitioner's younger brother Ramesh was taken into police custody and found dead the next day, with the police claiming it was suicide. The petitioner alleged Ramesh was tortured by police and died as a result. The court ordered a second autopsy, which was conducted. The court then directed that the investigation be transferred from the local police to the CBCID due to allegations against the local police. The court also issued directions for strict compliance in cases of custodial deaths, such as requiring video recording of full autopsies adhering to established forensic standards.
TN Police Constable Result 2017 Check Tamil Nadu TN Police Merit List Soon
TNUSRB Result 2017. Tamil Nadu Police Exam Result 2017 will be declared by the TNUSRB as soon as possible on the official website of Tamil Nadu Police Recruitment Board.
29.01.2021 abad hc order
- The document summarizes 3 writ petitions challenging the publication of petitioners' names on lists of top 10 criminals displayed at various police stations in Uttar Pradesh.
- The petitioners argue this violates their right to privacy and dignity under Article 21 of the Indian constitution. They claim their inclusion on the lists is due to false cases or political vendettas.
- The court heard arguments from the petitioners' counsel and amicus curiae on the right to privacy being integral to Article 21 and protected under Indian and international law. Displaying individuals' criminal histories and status violates this right if not done according to proper legal procedure.
Bom hc nagpur july 29 order
The applicant challenged two orders - one extending his detention for 90 days under the UAPA and the other rejecting his application for default bail. The court analyzed whether the requirements for seeking extension of detention under the UAPA were satisfied. It found that the public prosecutor had submitted a detailed report outlining the progress of the investigation and reasons for seeking an extension. It also found that a joint application for the applicant and another accused was justified as the allegations against them were identical. Therefore, the mandatory requirements for extending detention under the UAPA were satisfied and the applicant was not entitled to default bail.
Baljinder punjab hc final order
An inspector in the Punjab Police, Baljinder Singh, filed a petition seeking anticipatory bail in an FIR registered against him for illegally detaining and torturing the complainant, his son, and worker. The High Court dismissed the petition based on a SIT investigation report. The report found that while the complainant was not illegally detained on the date alleged, his son and worker were illegally detained and humiliated in the police station on a different date in the inspector's presence. As the station head, the inspector was still responsible for actions in his station. The court ruled the police actions unacceptable and that the inspector did not deserve discretionary relief.
Telangana hc order june 17 police brutality covid
The court ordered the police to submit injury reports, statements recorded, and updates on departmental inquiries into several incidents. The police counter-affidavit lacked these details and provided questionable explanations for some incidents. The court directed the police to submit the missing information by June 29th and listed the case for further hearing on June 30th.
LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 19TH AUGUST 2016
1. Rina Kumari filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of India against the CJM Court in Begusarai, Bihar and others alleging criminal conspiracy and abuse of process of law.
2. She claims the CJM Court and a women protection officer colluded to file frivolous cases against her over 6 years to restrict her movement and ruin her family life.
3. She requests the Supreme Court to take cognizance of the criminal conspiracy against her, ensure her personal liberty and freedom of movement, and pass appropriate orders against the CJM Court and women protection officer.
Second Appeal against Patna High Court_03_11_2016
This document is a second appeal filed with the Central Information Commission regarding information requested under the Right to Information Act. The appellant had previously filed requests for information from the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Begusarai regarding two court cases there. In the second appeal, the appellant argues that the responses received contained false or incomplete information, and requests that true and complete information be provided regarding details of the two court cases.
Second Appeal against Department of Legal Affairs dated 3_11_ 2016
This document is a second appeal filed with the Central Information Commission in India regarding information sought through Right to Information requests but not received. It summarizes previous requests and appeals filed with the Department of Legal Affairs in the Government of India and the Law Department of the Government of Bihar regarding frivolous legal cases filed against the appellant in 2010 and 2011. The appellant is seeking replies to 9 questions regarding the cases from the respondent departments.
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016
True Copy of Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 filed before Supreme Court of India dated 30th August 2016 against the State of Bihar for Quashing of criminal complaint case(P) 5591 of 2013 pending at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai CJM division Bihar.
Order dated 08.09.2017 announced by CIC New Delhi
Decision announced by CIC New Delhi against District & Sessions Judge-Cum-Appellate Authority Civil Court Begusarai under the Judicature of Patna High Court for Non-Compliance RTI Act 2005
Review Petition Criminal in Writ petition Criminal No.136 of 2016 before Su...
1. The petitioner has filed this review petition challenging the Supreme Court's October 21, 2016 order in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dismissing the petition with liberty to approach the Patna High Court.
2. The petitioner argues this order will have far-reaching negative consequences for the public, violate principles of natural justice, and result in a miscarriage of justice.
3. The petitioner further argues the Supreme Court failed to consider that the Delhi High Court had already settled the matter on July 23, 2013, and the petitioner was seeking punitive action for misconduct of state authorities rather than dispute settlement.
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Finally Department of Justice forwarded the complaint against felony of Registry of Supreme Court of India (which PMO had forwarded to DOJ) to Secretary General of Supreme Court of India.
Justice raja judgment
This document is a court judgment regarding a request made under the Right to Information Act for details of corrupt police officers in Kerala. The State Information Commission ordered the disclosure of information regarding officers convicted of corruption or human rights violations, or against whom a final police report was submitted to court. However, details of officers under ongoing investigation were not to be disclosed. The petitioners challenged this order, arguing the State Crime Records Bureau is exempt from RTI requests. The court heard arguments from both sides and the judgment discusses the issues around applying exemptions for ongoing investigations versus ordering disclosure of certain established misconduct details.
Rti dated 06.10.2018 against SC
The document details an RTI request filed by Om Prakash seeking information about the status of a criminal appeal petition he had filed with the Supreme Court of India regarding the suspicious death of Asha Rani Devi. The petition raised several defects that Mr. Prakash claims to have cured, but the registry is no longer responding to inquiries about the petition's status and the file seems to be missing. Through this RTI, Mr. Prakash is seeking a positive or negative reply from the registry on the registration of the criminal appeal and any actions taken regarding the petition.
41 a sc order
1. The petitioner challenged an FIR filed against her regarding Facebook posts alleging violations of lockdown restrictions in certain areas of West Bengal.
2. The Calcutta High Court had directed the petitioner to appear before the investigating officer if summoned under Section 41A of the CrPC.
3. The Supreme Court granted an interim stay on the high court's order and allowed the investigating officer to question the petitioner via video conferencing, with 24 hours notice. The petitioner was also willing to cooperate and respond to queries.
Vinod dua judgment
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case regarding a writ petition filed by Vinod Dua against the registration of an FIR against him. The FIR was filed pursuant to a complaint alleging that statements made by Dua in a YouTube talk show on March 30th spread false information and violated sections of the Indian Penal Code. In the writ petition, Dua argues that the contents of the video were critical analysis of the government and not unlawful. He seeks quashing of the FIR and guidelines for registering FIRs against members of the media with over 10 years of experience. The state's affidavit in reply refers to sections of the Disaster Management Act regarding punishment for false claims or warnings leading to panic during a pandemic.
Letter to chief justice of patna high court (either arrest or quash 498 a)
1) The document is a letter to the Chief Justice of the Patna High Court requesting either the arrest of the complainant or quashing of a criminal case filed under 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
2) It details two non-bailable warrants issued in 2010 and 2011 against the complainant and his deceased mother in relation to interconnected domestic violence and criminal cases.
3) The letter alleges that the subordinate courts in Begusarai have failed to execute the non-bailable warrants or arrest the complainant despite multiple opportunities, and that this inaction led to the suspicious death of his mother.
Allahabad hc order wpil(a) 574 2020 (1)
This document summarizes proceedings from a public interest litigation hearing regarding covid-19 conditions in Uttar Pradesh, India. Several advocates presented issues to the court, including lack of access to hospitals, oxygen shortages, overburdened healthcare systems, and mismanagement. The court acknowledged the problems and directed the state government to immediately improve management of existing infrastructure and raise healthcare capacity to 1% of city populations in each district. Major city hospitals were ordered to provide regular health bulletins to reduce visitors and the potential spread of covid-19. The situation was deemed chaotic and immediate action was needed.
Police administration and ranking of police officers in India
The police officers in India both under the Central and State Governments and their classifications with their badges and posts and also about types of offences and types of laws
Curative petition criminal before supreme court of india filed on 09.12.2016 ...
This document is a filing index for a curative petition being filed in the Supreme Court of India by Om Prakash against an order of the court dated October 21, 2016 in a previous writ petition. The curative petition seeks to set aside the previous order on grounds of abuse of process and miscarriage of justice. The filing index lists the documents being submitted in support of the curative petition, including affidavits, court orders being challenged, photographs, petitions submitted to the Chief Justice of India, and an application seeking cancellation of process and quashing of criminal proceedings.
Bombay hc urvashi order
1. Urvashi Chudawala, a 22-year-old student, has filed an anticipatory bail application apprehending arrest in Crime No. 28/2020 registered at Azad Maidan police station for offenses under sections 124A, 153B and 505 of IPC.
2. The FIR alleges that Chudawala uttered slogans supporting Sharjeel Imam who has been arrested for sedition, at a Queer Azadi march with 50-60 others. The prosecution argues her slogans support dividing India and oppose granting her bail.
3. The court must determine if Chudawala's actions constitute a cognizable offense or an exercise of her fundamental rights as argued
K'taka HC on Marital Rape.pdf
The document summarizes four writ petitions filed in the High Court of Karnataka regarding charges of rape against a husband.
1. The petitions challenge the constitutionality of sections 29 and 30 of the POCSO Act, which place the burden of proof on the accused, as violating Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Indian constitution.
2. One petition was filed by the accused husband seeking to quash the criminal proceedings against him for offenses including rape of his wife under section 376 of the IPC.
3. The lawyers for the accused argued that the presumptions under the POCSO Act are unconstitutional and that the original FIR did not mention offenses under section 376 of the IPC.
4
40947202215150145358judgement24-jul-2023-482833.pdf
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding appeals filed against orders granting bail to three accused in a murder case. The appellant argued the High Court erred in granting bail without considering the serious nature of the crimes and evidence against the accused. The State supported this view. The accused supported the High Court's judgments. The Supreme Court heard arguments from both sides and considered the law on factors relevant to bail.
More Related Content
What's hot
29.01.2021 abad hc order
- The document summarizes 3 writ petitions challenging the publication of petitioners' names on lists of top 10 criminals displayed at various police stations in Uttar Pradesh.
- The petitioners argue this violates their right to privacy and dignity under Article 21 of the Indian constitution. They claim their inclusion on the lists is due to false cases or political vendettas.
- The court heard arguments from the petitioners' counsel and amicus curiae on the right to privacy being integral to Article 21 and protected under Indian and international law. Displaying individuals' criminal histories and status violates this right if not done according to proper legal procedure.
Bom hc nagpur july 29 order
The applicant challenged two orders - one extending his detention for 90 days under the UAPA and the other rejecting his application for default bail. The court analyzed whether the requirements for seeking extension of detention under the UAPA were satisfied. It found that the public prosecutor had submitted a detailed report outlining the progress of the investigation and reasons for seeking an extension. It also found that a joint application for the applicant and another accused was justified as the allegations against them were identical. Therefore, the mandatory requirements for extending detention under the UAPA were satisfied and the applicant was not entitled to default bail.
Baljinder punjab hc final order
An inspector in the Punjab Police, Baljinder Singh, filed a petition seeking anticipatory bail in an FIR registered against him for illegally detaining and torturing the complainant, his son, and worker. The High Court dismissed the petition based on a SIT investigation report. The report found that while the complainant was not illegally detained on the date alleged, his son and worker were illegally detained and humiliated in the police station on a different date in the inspector's presence. As the station head, the inspector was still responsible for actions in his station. The court ruled the police actions unacceptable and that the inspector did not deserve discretionary relief.
Telangana hc order june 17 police brutality covid
The court ordered the police to submit injury reports, statements recorded, and updates on departmental inquiries into several incidents. The police counter-affidavit lacked these details and provided questionable explanations for some incidents. The court directed the police to submit the missing information by June 29th and listed the case for further hearing on June 30th.
LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 19TH AUGUST 2016
1. Rina Kumari filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of India against the CJM Court in Begusarai, Bihar and others alleging criminal conspiracy and abuse of process of law.
2. She claims the CJM Court and a women protection officer colluded to file frivolous cases against her over 6 years to restrict her movement and ruin her family life.
3. She requests the Supreme Court to take cognizance of the criminal conspiracy against her, ensure her personal liberty and freedom of movement, and pass appropriate orders against the CJM Court and women protection officer.
Second Appeal against Patna High Court_03_11_2016
This document is a second appeal filed with the Central Information Commission regarding information requested under the Right to Information Act. The appellant had previously filed requests for information from the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Begusarai regarding two court cases there. In the second appeal, the appellant argues that the responses received contained false or incomplete information, and requests that true and complete information be provided regarding details of the two court cases.
Second Appeal against Department of Legal Affairs dated 3_11_ 2016
This document is a second appeal filed with the Central Information Commission in India regarding information sought through Right to Information requests but not received. It summarizes previous requests and appeals filed with the Department of Legal Affairs in the Government of India and the Law Department of the Government of Bihar regarding frivolous legal cases filed against the appellant in 2010 and 2011. The appellant is seeking replies to 9 questions regarding the cases from the respondent departments.
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016
True Copy of Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 filed before Supreme Court of India dated 30th August 2016 against the State of Bihar for Quashing of criminal complaint case(P) 5591 of 2013 pending at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai CJM division Bihar.
Order dated 08.09.2017 announced by CIC New Delhi
Decision announced by CIC New Delhi against District & Sessions Judge-Cum-Appellate Authority Civil Court Begusarai under the Judicature of Patna High Court for Non-Compliance RTI Act 2005
Review Petition Criminal in Writ petition Criminal No.136 of 2016 before Su...
1. The petitioner has filed this review petition challenging the Supreme Court's October 21, 2016 order in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dismissing the petition with liberty to approach the Patna High Court.
2. The petitioner argues this order will have far-reaching negative consequences for the public, violate principles of natural justice, and result in a miscarriage of justice.
3. The petitioner further argues the Supreme Court failed to consider that the Delhi High Court had already settled the matter on July 23, 2013, and the petitioner was seeking punitive action for misconduct of state authorities rather than dispute settlement.
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Finally Department of Justice forwarded the complaint against felony of Registry of Supreme Court of India (which PMO had forwarded to DOJ) to Secretary General of Supreme Court of India.
Justice raja judgment
This document is a court judgment regarding a request made under the Right to Information Act for details of corrupt police officers in Kerala. The State Information Commission ordered the disclosure of information regarding officers convicted of corruption or human rights violations, or against whom a final police report was submitted to court. However, details of officers under ongoing investigation were not to be disclosed. The petitioners challenged this order, arguing the State Crime Records Bureau is exempt from RTI requests. The court heard arguments from both sides and the judgment discusses the issues around applying exemptions for ongoing investigations versus ordering disclosure of certain established misconduct details.
Rti dated 06.10.2018 against SC
The document details an RTI request filed by Om Prakash seeking information about the status of a criminal appeal petition he had filed with the Supreme Court of India regarding the suspicious death of Asha Rani Devi. The petition raised several defects that Mr. Prakash claims to have cured, but the registry is no longer responding to inquiries about the petition's status and the file seems to be missing. Through this RTI, Mr. Prakash is seeking a positive or negative reply from the registry on the registration of the criminal appeal and any actions taken regarding the petition.
41 a sc order
1. The petitioner challenged an FIR filed against her regarding Facebook posts alleging violations of lockdown restrictions in certain areas of West Bengal.
2. The Calcutta High Court had directed the petitioner to appear before the investigating officer if summoned under Section 41A of the CrPC.
3. The Supreme Court granted an interim stay on the high court's order and allowed the investigating officer to question the petitioner via video conferencing, with 24 hours notice. The petitioner was also willing to cooperate and respond to queries.
Vinod dua judgment
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case regarding a writ petition filed by Vinod Dua against the registration of an FIR against him. The FIR was filed pursuant to a complaint alleging that statements made by Dua in a YouTube talk show on March 30th spread false information and violated sections of the Indian Penal Code. In the writ petition, Dua argues that the contents of the video were critical analysis of the government and not unlawful. He seeks quashing of the FIR and guidelines for registering FIRs against members of the media with over 10 years of experience. The state's affidavit in reply refers to sections of the Disaster Management Act regarding punishment for false claims or warnings leading to panic during a pandemic.
Letter to chief justice of patna high court (either arrest or quash 498 a)
1) The document is a letter to the Chief Justice of the Patna High Court requesting either the arrest of the complainant or quashing of a criminal case filed under 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
2) It details two non-bailable warrants issued in 2010 and 2011 against the complainant and his deceased mother in relation to interconnected domestic violence and criminal cases.
3) The letter alleges that the subordinate courts in Begusarai have failed to execute the non-bailable warrants or arrest the complainant despite multiple opportunities, and that this inaction led to the suspicious death of his mother.
Allahabad hc order wpil(a) 574 2020 (1)
This document summarizes proceedings from a public interest litigation hearing regarding covid-19 conditions in Uttar Pradesh, India. Several advocates presented issues to the court, including lack of access to hospitals, oxygen shortages, overburdened healthcare systems, and mismanagement. The court acknowledged the problems and directed the state government to immediately improve management of existing infrastructure and raise healthcare capacity to 1% of city populations in each district. Major city hospitals were ordered to provide regular health bulletins to reduce visitors and the potential spread of covid-19. The situation was deemed chaotic and immediate action was needed.
Police administration and ranking of police officers in India
The police officers in India both under the Central and State Governments and their classifications with their badges and posts and also about types of offences and types of laws
Curative petition criminal before supreme court of india filed on 09.12.2016 ...
This document is a filing index for a curative petition being filed in the Supreme Court of India by Om Prakash against an order of the court dated October 21, 2016 in a previous writ petition. The curative petition seeks to set aside the previous order on grounds of abuse of process and miscarriage of justice. The filing index lists the documents being submitted in support of the curative petition, including affidavits, court orders being challenged, photographs, petitions submitted to the Chief Justice of India, and an application seeking cancellation of process and quashing of criminal proceedings.
What's hot (19)
LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 19TH AUGUST 2016
LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 19TH AUGUST 2016
Second Appeal against Department of Legal Affairs dated 3_11_ 2016
Second Appeal against Department of Legal Affairs dated 3_11_ 2016
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016
Review Petition Criminal in Writ petition Criminal No.136 of 2016 before Su...
Review Petition Criminal in Writ petition Criminal No.136 of 2016 before Su...
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Letter to chief justice of patna high court (either arrest or quash 498 a)
Letter to chief justice of patna high court (either arrest or quash 498 a)
Police administration and ranking of police officers in India
Police administration and ranking of police officers in India
Curative petition criminal before supreme court of india filed on 09.12.2016 ...
Curative petition criminal before supreme court of india filed on 09.12.2016 ...
Similar to Mp hc order nov 3
Bombay hc urvashi order
1. Urvashi Chudawala, a 22-year-old student, has filed an anticipatory bail application apprehending arrest in Crime No. 28/2020 registered at Azad Maidan police station for offenses under sections 124A, 153B and 505 of IPC.
2. The FIR alleges that Chudawala uttered slogans supporting Sharjeel Imam who has been arrested for sedition, at a Queer Azadi march with 50-60 others. The prosecution argues her slogans support dividing India and oppose granting her bail.
3. The court must determine if Chudawala's actions constitute a cognizable offense or an exercise of her fundamental rights as argued
K'taka HC on Marital Rape.pdf
The document summarizes four writ petitions filed in the High Court of Karnataka regarding charges of rape against a husband.
1. The petitions challenge the constitutionality of sections 29 and 30 of the POCSO Act, which place the burden of proof on the accused, as violating Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Indian constitution.
2. One petition was filed by the accused husband seeking to quash the criminal proceedings against him for offenses including rape of his wife under section 376 of the IPC.
3. The lawyers for the accused argued that the presumptions under the POCSO Act are unconstitutional and that the original FIR did not mention offenses under section 376 of the IPC.
4
40947202215150145358judgement24-jul-2023-482833.pdf
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding appeals filed against orders granting bail to three accused in a murder case. The appellant argued the High Court erred in granting bail without considering the serious nature of the crimes and evidence against the accused. The State supported this view. The accused supported the High Court's judgments. The Supreme Court heard arguments from both sides and considered the law on factors relevant to bail.
Jyoti Jagtap order bombay-hc-bail-order-439868.pdf
This document is a court judgment regarding an appeal filed by Jyoti Jagtap challenging the rejection of her bail application by the trial court. The key details are:
1) Jagtap has been charged under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and Unlawful Activities Prevention Act for her alleged involvement in the Bhima Koregaon violence case.
2) The prosecution alleges Jagtap was part of the organizing committee for the 'Elgar Parishad' event and attended meetings prior, participated in performances on the date which made provocative slogans as part of the larger conspiracy.
3) Jagtap applied for bail arguing the charges at most relate to minor offenses and there is no evidence
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
This document summarizes a court case in Mumbai, India involving 10 individuals from Indonesia who were charged with violating lockdown orders issued due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The prosecution presented evidence from two witnesses, police officers who discovered the individuals at a local mosque on April 5, 2020, allegedly in violation of restrictions. The defense disputed the evidence and cited other court rulings that discharged defendants in similar cases. The judge considered the arguments from both sides to determine if the prosecution had sufficiently proven their case.
orissa HC sc st act caste name calling.pdf
The High Court of Orissa partially allowed a criminal revision petition filed by Ajay Pattanaik and Another challenging their cognizance under the SC and ST Act. While the Court found that a prima facie case was made out against the petitioners for other offenses, it held that the offenses under the SC and ST Act were not established as there was no intent to insult or humiliate the witness due to his caste. The Court set aside the cognizance order under the SC and ST Act and directed the lower court to reconsider the process against the petitioners for the other charges.
rajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdf
A journalist named Aman Chopra filed a petition claiming three FIRs were registered against him for the same act of airing a discussion show and posting it on Twitter, which allegedly led to communal disharmony. The petitioner argued that the investigation of the subsequent two FIRs should not proceed as they were filed maliciously to harass him. The court issued notices to the respondents and granted the petitioner protection from arrest in the two subsequent FIRs until further orders, as the investigation of multiple FIRs for the same cause of action is not permissible according to Supreme Court judgments.
State v anwar hussain
1) Anwar Hussain applied for bail in an ongoing criminal case where he has been charged with rioting and murder that took place on February 24, 2020 near Kardampuri Pulia in Delhi during sectarian riots.
2) The prosecution opposed bail, arguing that Anwar was seen actively participating in the riots based on eyewitness accounts and CCTV footage. However, the footage was from February 23 and not the date of the incident.
3) Considering that the video evidence did not pertain to the date of the incident, the time Anwar has already spent in custody, and the circumstances of the case, the court granted bail to Anwar subject to certain conditions.
Anand teltumbde bombay HC.pdf
- The appellant, Dr. Anand Teltumbde, is appealing the rejection of his bail application by the Special Court in relation to an FIR registered by the NIA under various sections of the IPC and UAPA Act.
- The FIR was originally registered by Pune Police in 2018 regarding violence in Bhima Koregaon village on January 1, 2018 after an event called 'Elgar Parishad' the previous day. It was alleged that provocative speeches at the event led to the violence.
- During the investigation, several other individuals were arrested and chargesheets were filed against multiple accused. The case was later transferred to the NIA.
- The appellant surrendered in 2020 after
bom HC judgment Kudale.pdf
The petitioner filed two writ petitions seeking to quash two FIRs registered against him for alleged offenses of promoting enmity between groups and intentional insult to provoke breach of peace. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner uploaded videos on social media criticizing a Cabinet Minister's speech in a manner that provoked feelings among certain communities. The petitioner argued that the FIRs infringed on his freedom of speech and were politically motivated. The court considered whether offenses under relevant sections were disclosed based on the facts and the law on limitations to free speech. It reserved judgment after hearing arguments from both sides.
Mitali saran
This document discusses two petitions seeking to quash a defamation complaint filed against a newspaper and author. The complaint was filed by an individual claiming to be a member of the RSS organization. It references the article in question and examines whether the complainant qualifies as an "aggrieved person" under the law to file such a complaint. The court evaluates arguments from both sides and precedent case law. It finds that the complainant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove how his reputation was actually harmed or how the article lowered the reputation of RSS as required by law to constitute defamation.
Kafeel khan bail sept 1
- The petitioner, Nuzhat Perween, is seeking a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of her son Dr. Kafeel Khan, who has been detained under the National Security Act by the District Magistrate of Aligarh.
- Dr. Kafeel Khan addressed a gathering of protesting students at Aligarh Muslim University on December 12, 2019 regarding the Citizenship Amendment Act, after which a criminal case was registered against him for promoting enmity and disturbing public order. He was later arrested and granted bail by the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Aligarh on February 10, 2020.
- Despite the bail order, Dr. Kafeel Khan was not released from jail.
Sadiq order hc
This document is a bail application order from the High Court of Delhi regarding bail application number 2474/2021. The order provides background on the case, which involves violence and riots that took place in Delhi in February 2020. The petitioner is seeking bail in an FIR related to the violence. The order discusses the facts of the case, evidence and identification of the petitioner in videos from the scene, arguments from the petitioner's lawyer and the state, and the court's consideration of whether bail should be granted. Ultimately, the court provides a detailed summary of the arguments from both sides and the facts of the case in considering the bail application.
4256820228150148657judgement29-nov-2023-506861.pdf
29 नवंबर को, सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने एक महत्वपूर्ण फैसला सुनाया, जिसमें कहा गया कि भारतीय दंड संहिता की धारा 120-बी के तहत दंडनीय आपराधिक साजिश को धन शोधन निवारण अधिनियम (पीएमएलए) 2002 के तहत एक अनुसूचित अपराध केवल तभी माना जाएगा जब वह अधिनियम की अनुसूची में शामिल कोई अपराध हो, अन्यथा नहीं।
Uttar k hc order
The document is a high court judgment addressing three writ petitions seeking to quash an FIR filed against the petitioners for allegedly making defamatory claims on social media. The petitioners had accused certain individuals of accepting bribes on behalf of the Chief Minister. The court outlines the facts of the case, including the social media posts, the police inquiry requested, and the FIR ultimately filed. It notes that the case is part of an ongoing dispute involving allegations of bribery and corruption against the Chief Minister.
VYAPAM Scam Madhya Pradesh
The Petitioner is a Member of Parliament from Rajya Sabha and has been Chief Minister of State of Madhya Pradesh for 10 years. Being a public figure, the Petitioner has been serving the people of this country for the last forty years. As a man of impeccable integrity, the Petitioner is being subjected to humiliation as being an accomplice to someone who had allegedly “fabricated and forged evidence” in VYAPAM cases to mislead the investigation.
cra-d454202109112023finalorder-2-503843.pdf
पंजाब एंड हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट ने कड़े गैरकानूनी गतिविधि रोकथाम अधिनियम (UAPA Act) के तहत गिरफ्तार किए गए व्यक्ति को जमानत दे दी। कोर्ट ने यह यह देखते हुए उक्त व्यक्ति को जमानत दी कि पाकिस्तान के साथ संबंधों के आधार पर कथित तौर पर कुछ आतंकवादी कृत्यों को अंजाम देने की योजना बनाने के मामले में प्रथम दृष्टया कोई मामला नहीं बनता है।
M p bangle seller bail
1) The applicant Golu @ Tasneem @ Taslim filed a bail application in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh seeking bail in connection with a crime registered under various sections of IPC and POCSO Act.
2) It was argued for the applicant that he is the first offender and has been in custody since August 23, 2021. His custodial interrogation is no longer required.
3) The prosecution opposed the bail plea submitting that various identity cards of different names were recovered from the applicant. The court examined the facts of the case and granted bail to the applicant with various conditions.
Defection wit petition judgment
This document is the judgment from a court case regarding the induction of three individuals as Cabinet Ministers in Maharashtra who were not members of the state legislature.
The petitioners challenged their induction, arguing it violated Articles 163, 164 and the anti-defection law as the three individuals resigned from their parties less than six months before the end of the legislative term, making reelection impossible as required by Article 164.
The court heard arguments from both sides and disposed of the petitions, with the petitioner arguing the intent of the constitution was that non-legislator ministers must face election within six months and these three individuals had no such possibility.
Wp vernon gonsalves and anr vs state of maharashtra & ors.
This document is a writ petition filed in the Bombay High Court by Vernon Gonsalves and Anand Teltumbde, who are currently detained in Taloja Central Prison. It summarizes that an inmate who was in close contact with the petitioners has tested positive for COVID-19, putting the petitioners' health and safety at high risk as they are senior citizens. It requests the court to conduct COVID tests for the petitioners and make appropriate medical arrangements given the circumstances. The petition provides background details on the events leading to the petitioners' detention, their credentials, the charges against them, and the authorities involved in the matter.
Similar to Mp hc order nov 3 (20)
40947202215150145358judgement24-jul-2023-482833.pdf
40947202215150145358judgement24-jul-2023-482833.pdf
Jyoti Jagtap order bombay-hc-bail-order-439868.pdf
Jyoti Jagtap order bombay-hc-bail-order-439868.pdf
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
rajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdf
rajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdf
4256820228150148657judgement29-nov-2023-506861.pdf
4256820228150148657judgement29-nov-2023-506861.pdf
Wp vernon gonsalves and anr vs state of maharashtra & ors.
Wp vernon gonsalves and anr vs state of maharashtra & ors.
Recently uploaded
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Learn more on how to obtain the work permit for self-employed persons in Italy at https://immigration-italy.com/selfemployment-work-permit-in-italy/.
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptxGodwin Emmanuel Oyedokun MBA MSc PhD FCA FCTI FCNA CFE FFAR
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Business Laws Sunita saha
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
slide deck : Patenting innovations in 3D printing
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional and judicial approach
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Training aid for law enforcement officers related to search warrants, the requirements needed, drafting, and execution of the search warrant.
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
USDA grants bolster rural communities, driving growth, sustainability, and prosperity through strategic development initiatives and financial support.
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Presentation by Justin Ordoyo
University of the Philippines College of Law
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Recently uploaded (20)
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
Mp hc order nov 3
- 1. (B. K. SHRIVASTAVA) JUDGE The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh MCRC-34696-2020 (KAUSAL SINGH MASRAM Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) Jabalpur, Dated : 03-11-2020 Heard through Video Conferencing. Shri Sanjay Jharia, counsel for the applicant. Shri Vikram Johri, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. Shri Shantanu Ayachi, counsel for the objector/complainant. Arguments heard on the application filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of Kausal Singh Masram who is under apprehension of his arrest in connection with Crime No. 410/2020 registered at Police Station Umariya for offences punishable under Sections 292 of I.P.C. and 67 of I.T. Act. It appears from the record that the applicant posted vulgar photograph of Dr. Mohan Bhagwat who is a reputed person of India and a leader of R.S.S. The applicant tagged 28 persons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that he himself lodged the complaint to the police regarding misuse of his I.D. The aforesaid complaint has been lodged during pendency of this application and after two months from the registration of crime. It cannot be believed that the applicant was not having any knowledge because it is pointed out by the State as well as learned counsel for the objector that 35 persons like the post and 9 persons commented upon the post. Therefore, it may be presumed that the applicant is having the knowledge that his post has been seen by several persons. Looking to the aforesaid act of the accused, in view of this Court, he is not entitled to get the anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. vy 1 MCRC-34696-2020 Digitally signed by VAIBHAV YEOLEKAR Date: 2020.11.03 14:16:06 IST SANSignature Not Verified Digitally signed by VAIBHAV YEOLEKAR Date: 2020.11.03 14:16:06 IST SANSignature Not Verified