Decision announced by CIC New Delhi against District & Sessions Judge-Cum-Appellate Authority Civil Court Begusarai under the Judicature of Patna High Court for Non-Compliance RTI Act 2005
The Supreme Court of India heard a suo moto writ petition regarding problems faced by migrant workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Court noted submissions from petitioners regarding inadequate distribution of dry rations, cooked food and cash transfers to migrant workers. States provided details of steps taken to help migrant workers, including transportation, food and registration processes.
The Court emphasized the need to complete registration of unorganized workers under new social security laws to help workers access welfare schemes. It directed the central government to file an affidavit with details on developing a national database for registration of all unorganized workers across states. The Court also stressed the need to effectively monitor welfare schemes to ensure benefits reach beneficiaries.
The court heard arguments on a public interest litigation regarding covid conditions in quarantine centers and treatment of positive patients in Uttar Pradesh.
The court found the respondent state's affidavit unsatisfactory and not in compliance with their previous orders. It noted a lack of updated health bulletins, inadequate availability of life-saving drugs and equipment in hospitals, and inconsistencies in reported death figures.
The court directed the formation of a three-member grievance committee in each district to address public complaints about issues like lack of drugs, oxygen access etc. It also sought more data from select districts on rural healthcare centers and facilities to assess covid management outside cities. Further affidavits from the state were ordered within two days.
This document is a court ruling from the High Court of Madhya Pradesh regarding a public interest litigation petition seeking action against two police constables who allegedly beat an auto rickshaw driver for not wearing a mask properly. The court notes previous orders directing police not to use corporal punishment for violations of COVID protocols. While not commenting on the merits of the case, the court directs the Superintendent of Police of Indore to take appropriate action on complaints of police excesses and beatings, including against the two respondents, and ensure disciplinary proceedings are concluded. The court reaffirms its prior order that citizens should not face beatings for protocol violations, and police should instead counsel people to follow protocols.
1) The court heard from various counsel regarding the COVID-19 situation in Uttar Pradesh, including the availability of oxygen, vaccination efforts, and management of rural/smaller areas.
2) The District Magistrate of Lucknow provided a satisfactory explanation for oxygen shortage incidents, but the District Magistrate of Meerut was unable to sufficiently explain deaths at a trauma center.
3) The court directed expedited disposal of seized drugs and medical supplies, vaccination of disabled people, and management of COVID-19 spread in rural/smaller areas of the state. The matter was scheduled for a further hearing on May 11th.
1) The petitioner sought directions for the respondents to register migrant workers in Delhi under social security laws and provide them free medical facilities and income support.
2) The court noted that the government was already taking steps to help migrant workers, like providing shelter, food and healthcare, and had disbursed funds to some workers.
3) However, the court said a more structured response was needed to adequately help the voiceless. It directed the Chief Secretary to frame a scheme in 2 weeks to help unorganized workers, including simplifying registration under security laws and considering NGO involvement.
Delhi sessions court umar khalid handcuffs orderZahidManiyar
This document summarizes the court proceedings regarding applications to produce two accused persons, Umar Khalid and Khalid Saifi, in handcuffs. The court notes replies from jail superintendents, the DCP of Special Cell, and the DCP of the 3rd Battalion that suggest the applications lack merit as the prison rules do not mention handcuffing prisoners. As the accused are not convicted criminals or gangsters, the applications appear to have been filed without proper consideration. However, given new COVID protocols, the accused are no longer being produced in person in court, making the applications unnecessary at this stage. The court therefore dismisses the applications as not required.
This document summarizes a court case in Criminal Appeal No. 2158 of 2021. The appellant, Motilal, appealed to set aside an order denying him bail. Motilal claims to have had a distinct role from co-accused, only being present during the alleged victim's conversion, not directly involved. The court found nothing convincing justifying denying bail. The court allowed the appeal and set aside the order denying bail, ordering Motilal be released on bail with conditions but not extending to co-accused.
The Supreme Court of India heard a suo moto writ petition regarding problems faced by migrant workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Court noted submissions from petitioners regarding inadequate distribution of dry rations, cooked food and cash transfers to migrant workers. States provided details of steps taken to help migrant workers, including transportation, food and registration processes.
The Court emphasized the need to complete registration of unorganized workers under new social security laws to help workers access welfare schemes. It directed the central government to file an affidavit with details on developing a national database for registration of all unorganized workers across states. The Court also stressed the need to effectively monitor welfare schemes to ensure benefits reach beneficiaries.
The court heard arguments on a public interest litigation regarding covid conditions in quarantine centers and treatment of positive patients in Uttar Pradesh.
The court found the respondent state's affidavit unsatisfactory and not in compliance with their previous orders. It noted a lack of updated health bulletins, inadequate availability of life-saving drugs and equipment in hospitals, and inconsistencies in reported death figures.
The court directed the formation of a three-member grievance committee in each district to address public complaints about issues like lack of drugs, oxygen access etc. It also sought more data from select districts on rural healthcare centers and facilities to assess covid management outside cities. Further affidavits from the state were ordered within two days.
This document is a court ruling from the High Court of Madhya Pradesh regarding a public interest litigation petition seeking action against two police constables who allegedly beat an auto rickshaw driver for not wearing a mask properly. The court notes previous orders directing police not to use corporal punishment for violations of COVID protocols. While not commenting on the merits of the case, the court directs the Superintendent of Police of Indore to take appropriate action on complaints of police excesses and beatings, including against the two respondents, and ensure disciplinary proceedings are concluded. The court reaffirms its prior order that citizens should not face beatings for protocol violations, and police should instead counsel people to follow protocols.
1) The court heard from various counsel regarding the COVID-19 situation in Uttar Pradesh, including the availability of oxygen, vaccination efforts, and management of rural/smaller areas.
2) The District Magistrate of Lucknow provided a satisfactory explanation for oxygen shortage incidents, but the District Magistrate of Meerut was unable to sufficiently explain deaths at a trauma center.
3) The court directed expedited disposal of seized drugs and medical supplies, vaccination of disabled people, and management of COVID-19 spread in rural/smaller areas of the state. The matter was scheduled for a further hearing on May 11th.
1) The petitioner sought directions for the respondents to register migrant workers in Delhi under social security laws and provide them free medical facilities and income support.
2) The court noted that the government was already taking steps to help migrant workers, like providing shelter, food and healthcare, and had disbursed funds to some workers.
3) However, the court said a more structured response was needed to adequately help the voiceless. It directed the Chief Secretary to frame a scheme in 2 weeks to help unorganized workers, including simplifying registration under security laws and considering NGO involvement.
Delhi sessions court umar khalid handcuffs orderZahidManiyar
This document summarizes the court proceedings regarding applications to produce two accused persons, Umar Khalid and Khalid Saifi, in handcuffs. The court notes replies from jail superintendents, the DCP of Special Cell, and the DCP of the 3rd Battalion that suggest the applications lack merit as the prison rules do not mention handcuffing prisoners. As the accused are not convicted criminals or gangsters, the applications appear to have been filed without proper consideration. However, given new COVID protocols, the accused are no longer being produced in person in court, making the applications unnecessary at this stage. The court therefore dismisses the applications as not required.
This document summarizes a court case in Criminal Appeal No. 2158 of 2021. The appellant, Motilal, appealed to set aside an order denying him bail. Motilal claims to have had a distinct role from co-accused, only being present during the alleged victim's conversion, not directly involved. The court found nothing convincing justifying denying bail. The court allowed the appeal and set aside the order denying bail, ordering Motilal be released on bail with conditions but not extending to co-accused.
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking police protection from the third respondent and his brother who were interfering with her property possession and threatening her. However, the court dismissed the petition stating that there is a pending civil dispute between the petitioner and third respondent regarding the same property. The court noted that the police cannot interfere unless directed by the civil court handling the property dispute case. The petitioner was given liberty to seek appropriate remedies from the lower civil court, including police protection or initiating contempt proceedings.
CIC ORDER AGAINST DELHI STATE LEGAL SERVISCE AUTHORITY DATED 25 SEPTEMBER 2014Om Prakash Poddar
1) The appellant filed an RTI application seeking information about the action taken on his complaints from Delhi State Legal Services Authority.
2) The PIO provided a partial response which did not satisfy the appellant. He filed first and second appeals.
3) The Information Commissioner directed the PIO to provide information to the appellant within 3 weeks on the specific actions taken on his complaints from February and May 2012.
The Supreme Court of India heard a contempt petition regarding the vaccination and rehabilitation of persons with mental illness.
The Court directed all states to vaccinate inmates of mental health institutions within 1 month and submit a progress report by October 15th. It noted issues with some states merely redesignating existing facilities as halfway homes instead of establishing new ones per court orders.
The Court highlighted problems with Maharashtra shifting patients to beggar homes and old age homes, directing proper relocation by November 30th. It also found fault with Uttar Pradesh redesignating old age homes as halfway homes.
To monitor progress, the Court ordered the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment to create an online dashboard with real
The petitioner has challenged their suspension order from July 2019 on the grounds that the inquiry against them has not concluded after more than two years, which is not allowed according to previous court rulings. The respondents argue that the disciplinary authority has the power to issue multiple suspension orders and that the inquiry report against the petitioner was submitted in August 2021. The court granted the respondents time to file a counter affidavit, the petitioner time to file a rejoinder, and stayed the operation of the suspension order for now. The court also directed the inquiry to be concluded within one month and for the petitioner to cooperate, or it may proceed without them. The matter was listed for another hearing in November 2021 to inform the court of the inquiry outcome.
The document is a court order from the High Court of Bombay summarizing discussions in multiple petitions regarding COVID-19 conditions in Maharashtra prisons. It notes several deaths of infected inmates and calls for more testing. It requests updates from the state on prisoner populations and facilities. More time is granted to respond while expediting applications for temporary bail. Concerns over inmate communication and bail applications are also addressed.
This document summarizes a court case regarding conditions in correctional facilities in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry during the COVID-19 pandemic. It notes that high powered committees oversaw the facilities and reports were filed. While Tamil Nadu's situation was under control, Puducherry had an alarming positive case rate among inmates, though all but two have now recovered. The court ordered that decisions by the committees be published online, contact between inmates and lawyers be allowed via video, and that the matter return for review in a week.
1012-REVENUE – Chief Ministers Relief Fund – Procedure for processing of repr...bansi default
REVENUE – Chief Ministers Relief Fund – Procedure for processing of
representations at CM Camp Office for providing CMRF Assistance to persons
other than White Card holders for medical treatment – Certain orders - Issued.
Nexus of rtd justice s.b. sinha and praveen kumar idas to cgdaOm Prakash Poddar
Nexus of Rtd Justice S.B. Sinha & Praveen Kumar (IDAS) to kill me and my oxygen dependent mother in the defense area of Palam New Delhi and to usurp our property in Bihar has been apprised to Controller General Defense Accounts, Government of India to take departmental action against Praveen Kumar (IDAS)
Final status of PRSEC/E/2018/18152 dated 09.10.2018Om Prakash Poddar
The complainant filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition that the Supreme Court registry raised defects against, including objectionable remarks, and though the complainant responded the registry is now not responding to inquiries about the petition's status. The complainant is seeking a response from the registry on whether the Criminal Appeal will be registered or what action has been taken, and included copies of correspondence regarding curing defects for the President's Secretariat to take appropriate action.
Second Appeal against Department of Legal Affairs dated 3_11_ 2016Om Prakash Poddar
This document is a second appeal filed with the Central Information Commission in India regarding information sought through Right to Information requests but not received. It summarizes previous requests and appeals filed with the Department of Legal Affairs in the Government of India and the Law Department of the Government of Bihar regarding frivolous legal cases filed against the appellant in 2010 and 2011. The appellant is seeking replies to 9 questions regarding the cases from the respondent departments.
1) The appellant Karansinh Vaghela was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act for offenses related to alcohol prohibition.
2) The High Court quashed the detention order, finding that a single offense was not sufficient to classify the appellant as a "bootlegger" under the law or show that his activities affected public order.
3) The Court held that detention requires more than a mere disturbance of law and order - it must be shown that the activities would affect the community or public interest more broadly. This was not established based on a single offense.
This document is a second appeal filed with the Central Information Commission regarding information requested under the Right to Information Act. The appellant had previously filed requests for information from the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Begusarai regarding two court cases there. In the second appeal, the appellant argues that the responses received contained false or incomplete information, and requests that true and complete information be provided regarding details of the two court cases.
1. This document summarizes a court case involving a writ petition filed by two lesbian petitioners (S. Sushma and U. Seema Agarval) seeking police protection from their parents.
2. The petitioners had fled from Madurai to Chennai to escape pressure and opposition from their parents regarding their lesbian relationship. Their parents had filed missing person reports with the police.
3. The court held in-camera hearings and counseling sessions with the petitioners and their parents to better understand the situation. It was found that the petitioners were clear about their relationship, while the parents were concerned about societal stigma and their daughters' safety.
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018Om Prakash Poddar
Finally Department of Justice forwarded the complaint against felony of Registry of Supreme Court of India (which PMO had forwarded to DOJ) to Secretary General of Supreme Court of India.
1) The appellant Maj. Ravindran had filed an RTI application with the Delhi High Court seeking information related to a petition filed by DCM Financial Services Ltd.
2) He was asked to pay a fee of Rs. 490 for the application which he refused as his initial application was filed before new fees were notified.
3) The Central Information Commission heard the appeal and determined that the information should be provided free of cost as the High Court had agreed to respond free of charge for applications filed before the new notification. However, a copy of the petition could not be provided as the matter was still ongoing in court.
1. The document summarizes a court judgment from the High Court of Gujarat regarding criminal appeal case R/CR.A/1089/2021.
2. The appellant, Ashwinbhai @ Raj Ranchhodhbhai Poyala, had been convicted by a lower court for rape and offenses related to the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act for his relationship with the victim.
3. However, the High Court overturned the conviction after finding that the appellant and victim were in a consenting relationship, lived as husband and wife, and had two children together, so the case was more accurately an offense under the Child Marriage Act.
This document summarizes proceedings from a public interest litigation hearing regarding covid-19 conditions in Uttar Pradesh, India. Several advocates presented issues to the court, including lack of access to hospitals, oxygen shortages, overburdened healthcare systems, and mismanagement. The court acknowledged the problems and directed the state government to immediately improve management of existing infrastructure and raise healthcare capacity to 1% of city populations in each district. Major city hospitals were ordered to provide regular health bulletins to reduce visitors and the potential spread of covid-19. The situation was deemed chaotic and immediate action was needed.
1. The case of Ameer Ali versus State Azad Maidan Police Station was heard in the City Sessions Court of Mumbai on 08-09-2021 before Court 16 Additional Sessions Judge.
2. The anticipatory bail application of Ameer Ali was allowed with all conditions of the interim order dated 12-02-2020 made absolute.
3. An authenticated copy of the noting in the daily cause list was ordered to be supplied.
Second appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Patna High court dated 03.11.2016 be...Om Prakash Poddar
This document is a second appeal filed with the Central Information Commission regarding information requested under the Right to Information Act. The appellant had previously filed requests for information from the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Begusarai, Bihar regarding two court cases, but was dissatisfied with the responses received. The second appeal argues that the information provided was false, frivolous or incomplete. It provides arguments and evidence to support supplying the full and accurate information requested.
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017Om Prakash Poddar
Additional documents against Second Appeal vide D.No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016 being filed vide D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017 before CIC New Delhi along with FAA, District & Session Judge's reply.
Second appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Department of legal affairs dated 3....Om Prakash Poddar
Second Appeal under RTI Act 2005 filed before Central Information Commission (CIC), New Delhi upon refusal to supply information by First Appellate Authority Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law & Justice, Government of India & Law Department, Government of Bihar vide diary no. 183721 dated 03.11.2016
This is the 3rd part of a 5 part series wherein an effort has been made to expose how the public servants in India has subverted the only pro democracy, citizen friendly law in the country- the Right to Information Act. Here are some more examples of how the acts are perpetrated.
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking police protection from the third respondent and his brother who were interfering with her property possession and threatening her. However, the court dismissed the petition stating that there is a pending civil dispute between the petitioner and third respondent regarding the same property. The court noted that the police cannot interfere unless directed by the civil court handling the property dispute case. The petitioner was given liberty to seek appropriate remedies from the lower civil court, including police protection or initiating contempt proceedings.
CIC ORDER AGAINST DELHI STATE LEGAL SERVISCE AUTHORITY DATED 25 SEPTEMBER 2014Om Prakash Poddar
1) The appellant filed an RTI application seeking information about the action taken on his complaints from Delhi State Legal Services Authority.
2) The PIO provided a partial response which did not satisfy the appellant. He filed first and second appeals.
3) The Information Commissioner directed the PIO to provide information to the appellant within 3 weeks on the specific actions taken on his complaints from February and May 2012.
The Supreme Court of India heard a contempt petition regarding the vaccination and rehabilitation of persons with mental illness.
The Court directed all states to vaccinate inmates of mental health institutions within 1 month and submit a progress report by October 15th. It noted issues with some states merely redesignating existing facilities as halfway homes instead of establishing new ones per court orders.
The Court highlighted problems with Maharashtra shifting patients to beggar homes and old age homes, directing proper relocation by November 30th. It also found fault with Uttar Pradesh redesignating old age homes as halfway homes.
To monitor progress, the Court ordered the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment to create an online dashboard with real
The petitioner has challenged their suspension order from July 2019 on the grounds that the inquiry against them has not concluded after more than two years, which is not allowed according to previous court rulings. The respondents argue that the disciplinary authority has the power to issue multiple suspension orders and that the inquiry report against the petitioner was submitted in August 2021. The court granted the respondents time to file a counter affidavit, the petitioner time to file a rejoinder, and stayed the operation of the suspension order for now. The court also directed the inquiry to be concluded within one month and for the petitioner to cooperate, or it may proceed without them. The matter was listed for another hearing in November 2021 to inform the court of the inquiry outcome.
The document is a court order from the High Court of Bombay summarizing discussions in multiple petitions regarding COVID-19 conditions in Maharashtra prisons. It notes several deaths of infected inmates and calls for more testing. It requests updates from the state on prisoner populations and facilities. More time is granted to respond while expediting applications for temporary bail. Concerns over inmate communication and bail applications are also addressed.
This document summarizes a court case regarding conditions in correctional facilities in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry during the COVID-19 pandemic. It notes that high powered committees oversaw the facilities and reports were filed. While Tamil Nadu's situation was under control, Puducherry had an alarming positive case rate among inmates, though all but two have now recovered. The court ordered that decisions by the committees be published online, contact between inmates and lawyers be allowed via video, and that the matter return for review in a week.
1012-REVENUE – Chief Ministers Relief Fund – Procedure for processing of repr...bansi default
REVENUE – Chief Ministers Relief Fund – Procedure for processing of
representations at CM Camp Office for providing CMRF Assistance to persons
other than White Card holders for medical treatment – Certain orders - Issued.
Nexus of rtd justice s.b. sinha and praveen kumar idas to cgdaOm Prakash Poddar
Nexus of Rtd Justice S.B. Sinha & Praveen Kumar (IDAS) to kill me and my oxygen dependent mother in the defense area of Palam New Delhi and to usurp our property in Bihar has been apprised to Controller General Defense Accounts, Government of India to take departmental action against Praveen Kumar (IDAS)
Final status of PRSEC/E/2018/18152 dated 09.10.2018Om Prakash Poddar
The complainant filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition that the Supreme Court registry raised defects against, including objectionable remarks, and though the complainant responded the registry is now not responding to inquiries about the petition's status. The complainant is seeking a response from the registry on whether the Criminal Appeal will be registered or what action has been taken, and included copies of correspondence regarding curing defects for the President's Secretariat to take appropriate action.
Second Appeal against Department of Legal Affairs dated 3_11_ 2016Om Prakash Poddar
This document is a second appeal filed with the Central Information Commission in India regarding information sought through Right to Information requests but not received. It summarizes previous requests and appeals filed with the Department of Legal Affairs in the Government of India and the Law Department of the Government of Bihar regarding frivolous legal cases filed against the appellant in 2010 and 2011. The appellant is seeking replies to 9 questions regarding the cases from the respondent departments.
1) The appellant Karansinh Vaghela was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act for offenses related to alcohol prohibition.
2) The High Court quashed the detention order, finding that a single offense was not sufficient to classify the appellant as a "bootlegger" under the law or show that his activities affected public order.
3) The Court held that detention requires more than a mere disturbance of law and order - it must be shown that the activities would affect the community or public interest more broadly. This was not established based on a single offense.
This document is a second appeal filed with the Central Information Commission regarding information requested under the Right to Information Act. The appellant had previously filed requests for information from the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Begusarai regarding two court cases there. In the second appeal, the appellant argues that the responses received contained false or incomplete information, and requests that true and complete information be provided regarding details of the two court cases.
1. This document summarizes a court case involving a writ petition filed by two lesbian petitioners (S. Sushma and U. Seema Agarval) seeking police protection from their parents.
2. The petitioners had fled from Madurai to Chennai to escape pressure and opposition from their parents regarding their lesbian relationship. Their parents had filed missing person reports with the police.
3. The court held in-camera hearings and counseling sessions with the petitioners and their parents to better understand the situation. It was found that the petitioners were clear about their relationship, while the parents were concerned about societal stigma and their daughters' safety.
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018Om Prakash Poddar
Finally Department of Justice forwarded the complaint against felony of Registry of Supreme Court of India (which PMO had forwarded to DOJ) to Secretary General of Supreme Court of India.
1) The appellant Maj. Ravindran had filed an RTI application with the Delhi High Court seeking information related to a petition filed by DCM Financial Services Ltd.
2) He was asked to pay a fee of Rs. 490 for the application which he refused as his initial application was filed before new fees were notified.
3) The Central Information Commission heard the appeal and determined that the information should be provided free of cost as the High Court had agreed to respond free of charge for applications filed before the new notification. However, a copy of the petition could not be provided as the matter was still ongoing in court.
1. The document summarizes a court judgment from the High Court of Gujarat regarding criminal appeal case R/CR.A/1089/2021.
2. The appellant, Ashwinbhai @ Raj Ranchhodhbhai Poyala, had been convicted by a lower court for rape and offenses related to the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act for his relationship with the victim.
3. However, the High Court overturned the conviction after finding that the appellant and victim were in a consenting relationship, lived as husband and wife, and had two children together, so the case was more accurately an offense under the Child Marriage Act.
This document summarizes proceedings from a public interest litigation hearing regarding covid-19 conditions in Uttar Pradesh, India. Several advocates presented issues to the court, including lack of access to hospitals, oxygen shortages, overburdened healthcare systems, and mismanagement. The court acknowledged the problems and directed the state government to immediately improve management of existing infrastructure and raise healthcare capacity to 1% of city populations in each district. Major city hospitals were ordered to provide regular health bulletins to reduce visitors and the potential spread of covid-19. The situation was deemed chaotic and immediate action was needed.
1. The case of Ameer Ali versus State Azad Maidan Police Station was heard in the City Sessions Court of Mumbai on 08-09-2021 before Court 16 Additional Sessions Judge.
2. The anticipatory bail application of Ameer Ali was allowed with all conditions of the interim order dated 12-02-2020 made absolute.
3. An authenticated copy of the noting in the daily cause list was ordered to be supplied.
Second appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Patna High court dated 03.11.2016 be...Om Prakash Poddar
This document is a second appeal filed with the Central Information Commission regarding information requested under the Right to Information Act. The appellant had previously filed requests for information from the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Begusarai, Bihar regarding two court cases, but was dissatisfied with the responses received. The second appeal argues that the information provided was false, frivolous or incomplete. It provides arguments and evidence to support supplying the full and accurate information requested.
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017Om Prakash Poddar
Additional documents against Second Appeal vide D.No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016 being filed vide D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017 before CIC New Delhi along with FAA, District & Session Judge's reply.
Second appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Department of legal affairs dated 3....Om Prakash Poddar
Second Appeal under RTI Act 2005 filed before Central Information Commission (CIC), New Delhi upon refusal to supply information by First Appellate Authority Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law & Justice, Government of India & Law Department, Government of Bihar vide diary no. 183721 dated 03.11.2016
This is the 3rd part of a 5 part series wherein an effort has been made to expose how the public servants in India has subverted the only pro democracy, citizen friendly law in the country- the Right to Information Act. Here are some more examples of how the acts are perpetrated.
Surya Pratap Singh, a retired IAS officer, filed a petition to quash an FIR registered against him for a tweet he posted on May 13, 2021. The tweet included photographs from 2014 and was alleged to spread hatred and tension. The petitioner's counsel argued the tweet intended to raise public concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic and did not intend to malign the government. The court issued a stay on the petitioner's arrest and granted time for counter affidavits, rejoinders and a future hearing.
RTI dated 22.04.2018 against Department of Justice Om Prakash Poddar
Since matter is same and jurisdictions of two states are involved into it and the same matter has been settled by the Hon ble High Court of Delhi in MATT. APPL. 7 of 2012 on 23.07.2013 and Appellant Number 02 SMT. ASHA RANI DEV has been succumbed to planned judicial murder on 11.11.2017 and Appellant No.01 has become underground due to imminent danger to his “Life & liberty” therefore Department of Justice is the competent authority to supply complete information.This is with reference to RTI reply memo No. 438 dated 27.08.2016 by C.J.M Cum PIO and FAA reply memo no.4036 dated 20.09.2017 by District & Session Judge Cum Appellate Authority Civil Courts Begusarai under the judicature of Patna High Court
1. The appellant Gautam Navlakha appealed an order denying him statutory bail under section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
2. The appellant had been arrested on October 28, 2018 and spent 34 days under house arrest until October 1, 2018 when the arrest was quashed by the Delhi High Court.
3. The appellant argued that the 34 days spent under house arrest should be counted as time in custody, which combined with subsequent periods of NIA and judicial custody would exceed the 90 day limit for filing a charge sheet under section 167(2) of the CrPC.
1. The appellant filed an RTI application seeking information about why his application for urgent mentioning before the Chief Justice of India was not listed.
2. The CPIO and FAA responded to the appellant but he filed a second appeal to the Central Information Commission.
3. At the hearing, the respondent argued that the information sought was in the nature of a legal query and opinion, which is not covered by the RTI Act. They also cited a Supreme Court stay on disclosing information about complaints against judges.
4. The Commission found that the respondent had provided satisfactory information in response to the RTI application and no further intervention was required. The appeal was disposed of.
Order of CIC is self explanatory as to how Central Registry of CIC is persisting criminal conspiracy against the Appellant and protecting the bad elements State Apparatus
The document discusses a case where an individual filed a Right to Information request seeking details of medical expenses for judges of the Supreme Court of India. The Central Information Commission had directed that these medical expense records be maintained separately for each judge. However, the court set aside this order, finding that medical records are exempt from disclosure and there was no valid public interest in disclosing individual judges' medical reimbursement details.
Department of Justice Government of India forwarded RTI request bearing registration No.
JUSTC/R/2018/51094 to Patna High Court on 05.06.2018 for necessary action.
First Appeal against misleading RTI reply by Mr. Krishan Talwar, Deputy Secretary and CPIO, CIC New Delhi pertaining to Life and liberty of an underground Appellant in the garb of section 2 (f) of the RTI Act 2005
CPIO says, "advise, response to queries/questions, opinion, reason are not covered under section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005".
However, RTI request is very much covered under section 2(f) of RTI Act 2005. As per the definition of section 2(f) of RTI Act 2005,
Section 2(f) of RTI Act 2005 reads as "information" means any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force”.
This document is an urgent whistleblower application filed in an Indian court. It seeks to bring important information on record related to the administration of justice in judicial institutions. It references several pending applications filed by the whistleblower dating back to 2011 that remain undecided. These applications contain evidence of criminal conspiracy and involvement of public servants and judicial officers that the whistleblower seeks to present. The document requests that if the whistleblower's locus standi (standing) is questioned, the pending probate case determining this issue must be decided first before the applications can be heard. It urges the court to decide the various pending applications in sequence to allow the whistleblower to present pre-charge evidence in the matter.
Mamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of periodchandira thangavel
This document is an affidavit filed in the Honorable High Court of Judicature at Chennai by P. Chandira (1st petitioner) on behalf of herself and her husband R. Thangavel (2nd petitioner). It summarizes the career history of the 2nd petitioner in Neyveli Lignite Corporation spanning over 30 years, details allegations of harassment and victimization faced by the petitioners, and lists 12 orders passed in previous legal proceedings that the petitioners are seeking relief from through this writ petition. The petitioners have prayed for the respondents to submit reports in the case and for records pertaining to the previous legal proceedings to be called for, in order to regularize the service period of the petitioners
APPEAL CASE NO. 2422 OF 2019 Kanika aka Kusum Relan D/o Sh. Sita Ram Relan, 5...tigele
SIC, HARYANA
SCO NO. 70-71, SECTOR 8-C, CHANDIGARH
APPEAL CASE NO. 2422 OF 2019
Appellant Ms. Kusum Relan D/o Sh. Sita Ram Relan,
5/335, Railway Road, Sonepat.
Chief Information Commissioner Shri Yash Pal Singal
2. Ms. Kusum Relan, the appellant addressed RTI dated 22.03.2018 to the SPIO of the office of Superintendent of Police, Sonepat and submitted that a complaint dated 11.03.2016 was lodged by her with the police against Sh. Navneet Verma and his family but it was withdrawn in the morning of next day. The In-charge of the Police Station instead of returning the complaint kept it on the record stating that it has now been filed. The complaint was withdrawn in view of the respect of her parents in the society. Thereafter, Sh. Navneet Verma has been able to obtain the copy of the said complaint under the provision of RTI applications and succeeded in spoiling her future by taking up the matter with her in-laws.
3. The respondent SPIO further submitted that appellant is making allegation that her complaint dated 11.03.2016 has been shared with information seeker who used the said complaint with her in-laws. Now, on the complaint lodged by the applicant against her husband, a case no. 794 of 2017 has been registered under section 323, 354, 377, 406, 498 A, 506, 34 IPC, in City Police Station, Sonepat and challan of the case stands put in the court of jurisdiction.
4. Sh. Sita Ram Relan, represented the appellant, alleged that the respondent SPIO has not acted in accordance with the provision of RTI Act, 2005 and furnished information to third party which was closely related to her daughter . The said information was later on misused and the future of her daughter has been spoilt. He prayed for taking strong action against the SPIO and also requested to grant the appellant compensation for the detriment and mental agony caused to her.
5. The Commission carefully considered the matter. Records of the case have been perused. The averments submitted by the parties have been noted. The appellant has agitated for wrongly furnishing of personal information to third party which was later on misused and her future has been spoilt. The representative of the appellant requested to take action against the SPIO and compensate the appellant as per provisions of the Act. The Commission in is regard perused Section 21 of the RTI Act, 2005 reads as under:-
“ No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against any person for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Act or any rule made thereunder.”
The Commission cannot take any action against the respondent SPIO in view of the fact no mala fide of SPIO has been established and in view of the provision of Section 21 of the Act as reproduced above.
6. In view of the above stated facts, the Commission decides to close the matter. Announced. To be communicated.
Sd/-
(Yash Pal Singal)
Place : Chandigarh. CIC,
Dated: 24.04.2019 Haryana.
1) The Appellant was arrested and remanded to judicial custody in August 2018 for alleged offenses under the NDPS Act. After 180 days in custody, he applied for bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC since charges had not been filed. The Trial Court granted bail.
2) The Respondent filed an appeal in the High Court to cancel bail. The High Court allowed the appeal, canceling bail. The Appellant appealed to the Supreme Court.
3) The key issue is whether the Appellant was entitled to default bail after 180 days as provided in Section 167(2) of the CrPC, or if the subsequent filing of an additional complaint defeated his right to bail.
1) The petitioner, M. Ananthan, was arrested in 2018 for drug offenses involving commercial quantities of ganja and has been in judicial custody since.
2) While the petitioner satisfies one requirement for bail under the NDPS Act by not having a criminal record, the court found he did not satisfy the second requirement that he is not likely to have committed the offense based on evidence.
3) However, the court determined the petitioner's right to a speedy trial had been violated as the trial had not commenced for over two years. As such, the court directed the prosecution to pay compensation of Rs. 1 lakh and for the trial to conclude within three months.
1. The petitioners challenge an order granting a 90-day extension for further investigation in a case involving offenses under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act.
2. The petitioners argue that the extension was invalid because the report required under Section 43-D of the Act from the Public Prosecutor indicating progress and reasons for further detention was not submitted.
3. The State argues that while the application was not formally labeled a "report", it contained the necessary information and should be treated as satisfying the statutory requirement. The judge was therefore justified in granting the 90-day extension based on being satisfied with the reasons given for needing more time.
Similar to Order dated 08.09.2017 announced by CIC New Delhi (20)
Reply to Election Commission Delhi in NGS5322435639 dated 25.11.2022.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
ERO Ms. Sunita Raj mobile no. 9650058340 59-Vishwas Nagar Constituency Sahadra district at East Delhi has admitted this fact that she has sent her man for making a fake voters under the legal guardianship of Complainant on 24.11.2022 at Shelter Home DUSIB Code No.214 near Anand Vihar ISBT Delhi. Hence, your BLO will disclose the name and address of person for whom he wanted to make fake Voter ID with ulterior motives.
112 call has been made against your fraud BLO dated 24.11.2022 with unique reference no. 6161038, PCR Petrol Vehicle ROMO9A mobile no. 7428002509 at 19.32.34pm. Anand Vihar policeman mobile number is 8595888677. Police had taken him to the police station. Hence police has recorded his name and address and motives behind it.
Inquiry officer Balveer Singh mobile no. 9654963400 of Patpatganj Industrial Area Police Station near Anand Vihar ISBT Delhi will provide you the name and address of person who had come to make a fake voters under the legal guardianship of Complainant.
Your fraud BLO did not disclose his identity before complainant.
Complaint dated 27.11.2022 to Commissioner of Polic Delhi.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
TAKE the cognizance of obvious links between Ms. Sunita Raj, BLO Anand Vihar and Mr. Manish Raj with this International Sex Racket and direct to concern SHO to register an F.I.R against the accused under relevant sections of IPC.
112 call dated 24.11.2022 at 19.32.34pm with unique reference no. 6161038 and subsequent Complaint dated 25.11.2022 to the Commissioner of Police Delhi dated 25.11.2022 discloses links with Mr. Manish Raj son of Chief Minister of Jharkhand in this International Sex Racket
Suppression of crucial records in Office Report dated 26.11.2022 in W.P. (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 listed for hearing on 28.11.2022 before Chamber Judge HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, Court No.15 CL.NO.1748 may lead to dismissal of petition.
Registry has only recorded the records to defend its heinous work in the Office Report dated 26.11.2022 hiding all the factual crucial records filed by the petitioner even after his reminder though e-filed letter dated 22.11.2022 addressed to Branch Officer and Assistant Registrar Section X
Office Report dated 26.11.2022 in International Sex Racket matter Writ Petit...Om Prakash Poddar
Registry has recorded records in his favor only and has ignored the crucial records of petitioner deliberately to dismiss the petition by default.
Office Report dated 26.11.2022 for the hearing of Writ Petition Criminal Diary No. 18646/2022 on 28.11.2022 has been made hiding the crucial records filed by the petitioner.
Office Report dated 28.11.2022 in International Sex Racket matter Writ Petit...Om Prakash Poddar
The document is an office report from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition filed by Om Prakash against the Union of India and others. The court had previously given the petitioner four weeks to cure any defects in the petition, but the petitioner has failed to file an application for condonation of delay in filing the writ petition within that timeframe. As there are still defects, the registrar has not yet interacted with the petitioner-in-person, so the matter is listed before the court for further directions.
Complaint dated 26.11.22 against Election Officer Katihar Bihar.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
a fake voter identity card has been created by BLO Part-220, Ward No.03, 64-Kadwa Constituency Katihar Bihar vide EPIC No. TYGO395244 against the Complainant. Complainant has figured out malpractices of BLO and submitted requisite form before BLO Gopal Malik mobile no. 9507949474 dated 17.12.2021 for deletion of his name from the voter list to suppress the practice of multiple voter identity cards across the Country.
Complaint dated 25.11.22 against Election Officer Sahadra Delhi.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
Sex abuser Manish from Election Commission Delhi took my Aadhar Card by fraud to make Voter ID for my kidnapped minor daughter marking me as a legal guardian under Vishwas Nagar Constituency at Sahadra district of East Delhi.
Praying from you to direct the registry to supply the fixed date of hearing to the petitioner in person in writing in Non Bailable and Gang Rape matter W.P. Criminal Diary No. 18546/2022 so that he can plan his travel for home
Letter dated 22.11.2022 to Branch Officer Section 10 at Supreme Court of Ind...Om Prakash Poddar
Take all 84 e-filed legal documents with effect from 07.06.2022 to 22.11.2022 along with physical filed legal document with effect from 14.06.2022 to till date on Record of office report for the date of hearing on 25.11.2022
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 25.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed deliberately by Supreme Court of India with ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 25.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional filed Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed by Supreme Court of India with an ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 07.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
This document contains information from the Supreme Court of India case management system. It lists details of a writ petition filed by Om Prakash such as the case type, number, year and presiding bench. It also includes a table with 10 uploaded PDF documents related to the petition, interlocutory applications and memos of appearance. General information about the court such as jurisdiction, officers, rules, and procedures is also presented.
E-Filed Petition dated 07.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Supreme Court ...Om Prakash Poddar
This document contains details of a case filed with the Supreme Court of India, including the case type, number, year, petitioner and respondent details, and a list of uploaded documents related to the case. It provides contact information for the Supreme Court of India and links to other resources on their website.
Complaint dated 21.11.2022 against Bihar and Delhi police to NHRC.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
The National Human Rights Commission has received a complaint from Om Prakash regarding the kidnapping and abduction of his family members and minor daughters since 2011. The complaint details that neither the Delhi Police nor Bihar Police have registered an FIR regarding this incident. The complaint further states that the police complaint and post-mortem report of Om Prakash's deceased mother, who died in 2017, are still pending with the Palam Village Police Station in New Delhi. Om Prakash alleges that five individuals, including two advocates, can provide information to rescue his minor daughters and has requested that an FIR be registered against these five people.
E-filed status dated 15.11.22 before Supreme Court of India.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
E-filed Important legal documents like Interlocutory Applications for additional grounds and cancellation of Non Bailable Warrant has not been entered into Physical filing case record Writ Petition Criminal Diary No. 18546/2022 to present the wrong fact before the Chamber Judge on 25.11.2022
Complaint aginst Delhi Police to NHRC New Delhi dated 20.11.22.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
ABDUCTION/RAPE by Police
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Hence, register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
ABDUCTION/RAPE by Police case.
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters. Hence, register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
Register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
Writ Petition Criminal Diary Number 18546 of 2022 Part-I .pdfOm Prakash Poddar
International Sex Racket and Anti-Prostitution Petition before Supreme Court of India.
These five are key people and will reveal all records in this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Register F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court New Delhi.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Order dated 08.09.2017 announced by CIC New Delhi
1. 1
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan,
Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi -110066
Tel : +91-11-26186535
Complaint No. CIC/MOLAJ/C/2016/299945
Complainant: Mr. Om Prakash,
Respondent: Central Public Information Officer,
Registrar Genl.,
Bihar High Court,Patna-800001.
Date of Hearing: 08.09.2017
Date of Decision: 08.09.2017
ORDER
Facts:
1. The complainant filed RTI application dated 25.07.2011 seeking information
regarding that “whether or not institution or judge can refuse to accept the
valuable information of the respondent who is under life threat which has been
given in affidavit through CJM Court Begusarai on unannounced date by him;
what action will be taken against such officials who suppress the democratic
rights of the citizen”.
2. The Ministry of Law and Justice responded on 01.08.2011 informing the
complainant that his RTI application has been transferred to PIO, Delhi High
Court and Patna High Court. The complainant filed a complaint on 20.8.2016
before the Commission.
Hearing:
3. The complainant was personally present in the hearing. The respondent
participated in the hearing through VC.
4. The complainant had sent his written submissions dated 30.08.2017, which
is taken on record.
2. 2
5. The complainant referred to his RTI application dated 28.05.2016 and stated
that no information was provided to him. He stated that on 02.09.2016, first
appeal was filed by him with the First Appellate Authority viz. Hon’ble High
Court, Patna but his first appeal was not disposed off till date by the FAA. He
apprised that date of his RTI application has wrongly been mentioned in the
hearing notice.
6. The complainant stated that his matter pertains to imminent danger to life
and personal liberty. The complainant stated that two criminal cases were filed
against him wherein two NBWs were issued. He stated that orders in one
criminal case have been concealed from him with criminal intention. The
complainant stated that he has exhausted all legal remedies but no relief was
given to him.
7. The complainant prayed before the Commission that his first appeal should
be disposed off expeditiously by the FAA. He also sought information regarding
grounds of Criminal case complaint (P) No. 5591 of 2013 u/s. 498A being
registered by the same CJM division, Begusarai and NBW dated 08.09.2011
u/s. 83 being issued by SDJM court under same CJM division and this
information being kept secret.
8. The respondent stated that the complainant had filed two RTI applications
dated 25.07.2011 and 28.05.2016. He stated that they have transferred both
the RTI applications to the CJM and PIO, Begusarai.
9. During the hearing, the complainant stated that his first appeal was also
transferred by the Hon’ble High Court, Patna to District Judge, Begusarai vide
their Memo no. 65815 dated 01.10.2016 and memo no. 82921 dated
20.12.2016. The complainant stated that till date he has not received any reply
from the FAA.
Discussion/Observations:
3. 3
10. The action/steps taken by the respondent in dealing with the RTI
application is satisfactory.
Decision:
11. The respondent may consider and exercise their supervisory power to
advise the District Judge (First Appellate Authority) for expeditious disposal of
the first appeal of the complainant.
The complaint is disposed of. Copy of this order be given free of cost to the
parties.
(Radha Krishna Mathur)
Chief Information Commissioner
Authenticated true copy
(S.C. Sharma)
Dy. Registrar