Madras hc march 1 order
•
0 likes•221 views
This order summarizes a criminal case in the Madras High Court. The petitioner, S. Devika, filed a criminal original petition to quash proceedings against her in case C.C.No.760 of 2020 before the IX Metropolitan Magistrate's Court in Saidapet, Chennai. The High Court allowed the petition, noting that no offense had been made out against the petitioner based on precedents. It also noted that the government had decided to withdraw all cases registered against those protesting the Citizenship Amendment Act. Therefore, the High Court quashed the proceedings in case C.C.No.760 of 2020, as continuing it would serve no useful purpose.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Madras hc cbi judgment
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to transfer the investigation of a case involving the collection of around Rs. 300 crores in deposits by a company to the CBI. The court noted that the case is currently being investigated by the Economic Offences Wing and that the investigation is progressing well with movable properties seized and 19 immovable properties identified based on confession statements. While there is usually a demand for CBI investigation, transferring the case now would adversely affect the ongoing investigation. The court thus denied the petitioner's request and hopes the Economic Offences Wing will attach properties and file a charge sheet swiftly.
RTI dated 18.07.2019 against Patna High Court for violation of Patna High Co...
The applicant filed an RTI request with the Department of Justice seeking information about a case filed in the Patna High Court regarding violations of court rules in processing his petition and why his case has not been listed for hearing despite removing defects. He provides details of the case and raises several questions about delays and improper procedures by the court registry. The RTI request was received on July 18, 2019 regarding the status of his case in the Patna High Court.
Madras hc madurai bench order
This document is a court order from the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court regarding a writ petition filed by the petitioner Santhosh. The petitioner's younger brother Ramesh was taken into police custody and found dead the next day, with the police claiming it was suicide. The petitioner alleged Ramesh was tortured by police and died as a result. The court ordered a second autopsy, which was conducted. The court then directed that the investigation be transferred from the local police to the CBCID due to allegations against the local police. The court also issued directions for strict compliance in cases of custodial deaths, such as requiring video recording of full autopsies adhering to established forensic standards.
Saleem khan
The Additional Sessions Judge of Shahdara District Court in Delhi dismissed the application of accused Saleem Khan for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. Khan argued he was entitled to bail as the police had not filed a charge sheet within 90 days of his arrest on June 25, 2020. However, the court noted the charge sheet was in fact filed on September 16, 2020, within the 90 day period. The court also affirmed it had jurisdiction to hear the case as it had been designated as a Special Court for trial of cases relating to 2020 Delhi riots by orders of the Delhi High Court and Lieutenant Governor of Delhi.
Tasleem ahmed
The court denied the application of accused Tasleem Ahmed for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. Tasleem Ahmed had argued that he was entitled to bail as the police had not filed a charge sheet within 90 days of his arrest on June 24, 2020. However, the court noted that the charge sheet was in fact filed on September 16, 2020, within the 90 day period. The court also ruled that it had jurisdiction to hear the case, citing notifications and orders from the Delhi government and High Court designating it as a special court to try cases related to the 2020 Delhi riots.
Jaipur blast sc order
The Supreme Court of India heard a special leave petition filed by Shahvaz Hussain against an order of the Rajasthan High Court dismissing his bail application. Hussain is accused of assaulting jail staff during a search, but claims he was severely beaten while in custody as shown by a medical report. Considering this and the 11 injuries suffered by Hussain in custody, the Supreme Court granted him bail. It also directed the State Government to conduct an inquiry by a senior officer into Hussain's allegations against jail authorities and take action against any guilty officials.
Gulfisha fatima
The court order denies the application of accused Gulfisha Fatima for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. It notes that Gulfisha was arrested on April 11, 2020 in the present case. While over 183 days had passed since her arrest, the charge sheet was filed within the extended period of investigation on September 16, 2020. It also finds that the court has jurisdiction in this matter as per notifications and orders issued by the Delhi government and High Court designating the court to try cases related to the 2020 Delhi riots. Therefore, the court dismisses Gulfisha's application for statutory bail as no case for relief under Section 167(2) is made out.
15656 of 2020
The document summarizes a court case regarding a complaint filed against individuals who depicted the Indian national flag on a cake at a Christmas celebration event.
1) The complainant felt depicting the flag on a cake that was later cut and consumed amounted to insulting the national flag, which is an offense under Indian law. However, police initially refused to file an FIR.
2) The complainant then filed a petition with a judicial magistrate seeking an order directing police to file an FIR. The magistrate took cognizance of the complaint but then improperly reverted to using powers under a different section of criminal law to direct police to investigate.
3) The court hearing the challenge to the magistrate's order found that once cogniz
Recommended
Madras hc cbi judgment
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to transfer the investigation of a case involving the collection of around Rs. 300 crores in deposits by a company to the CBI. The court noted that the case is currently being investigated by the Economic Offences Wing and that the investigation is progressing well with movable properties seized and 19 immovable properties identified based on confession statements. While there is usually a demand for CBI investigation, transferring the case now would adversely affect the ongoing investigation. The court thus denied the petitioner's request and hopes the Economic Offences Wing will attach properties and file a charge sheet swiftly.
RTI dated 18.07.2019 against Patna High Court for violation of Patna High Co...
The applicant filed an RTI request with the Department of Justice seeking information about a case filed in the Patna High Court regarding violations of court rules in processing his petition and why his case has not been listed for hearing despite removing defects. He provides details of the case and raises several questions about delays and improper procedures by the court registry. The RTI request was received on July 18, 2019 regarding the status of his case in the Patna High Court.
Madras hc madurai bench order
This document is a court order from the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court regarding a writ petition filed by the petitioner Santhosh. The petitioner's younger brother Ramesh was taken into police custody and found dead the next day, with the police claiming it was suicide. The petitioner alleged Ramesh was tortured by police and died as a result. The court ordered a second autopsy, which was conducted. The court then directed that the investigation be transferred from the local police to the CBCID due to allegations against the local police. The court also issued directions for strict compliance in cases of custodial deaths, such as requiring video recording of full autopsies adhering to established forensic standards.
Saleem khan
The Additional Sessions Judge of Shahdara District Court in Delhi dismissed the application of accused Saleem Khan for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. Khan argued he was entitled to bail as the police had not filed a charge sheet within 90 days of his arrest on June 25, 2020. However, the court noted the charge sheet was in fact filed on September 16, 2020, within the 90 day period. The court also affirmed it had jurisdiction to hear the case as it had been designated as a Special Court for trial of cases relating to 2020 Delhi riots by orders of the Delhi High Court and Lieutenant Governor of Delhi.
Tasleem ahmed
The court denied the application of accused Tasleem Ahmed for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. Tasleem Ahmed had argued that he was entitled to bail as the police had not filed a charge sheet within 90 days of his arrest on June 24, 2020. However, the court noted that the charge sheet was in fact filed on September 16, 2020, within the 90 day period. The court also ruled that it had jurisdiction to hear the case, citing notifications and orders from the Delhi government and High Court designating it as a special court to try cases related to the 2020 Delhi riots.
Jaipur blast sc order
The Supreme Court of India heard a special leave petition filed by Shahvaz Hussain against an order of the Rajasthan High Court dismissing his bail application. Hussain is accused of assaulting jail staff during a search, but claims he was severely beaten while in custody as shown by a medical report. Considering this and the 11 injuries suffered by Hussain in custody, the Supreme Court granted him bail. It also directed the State Government to conduct an inquiry by a senior officer into Hussain's allegations against jail authorities and take action against any guilty officials.
Gulfisha fatima
The court order denies the application of accused Gulfisha Fatima for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. It notes that Gulfisha was arrested on April 11, 2020 in the present case. While over 183 days had passed since her arrest, the charge sheet was filed within the extended period of investigation on September 16, 2020. It also finds that the court has jurisdiction in this matter as per notifications and orders issued by the Delhi government and High Court designating the court to try cases related to the 2020 Delhi riots. Therefore, the court dismisses Gulfisha's application for statutory bail as no case for relief under Section 167(2) is made out.
15656 of 2020
The document summarizes a court case regarding a complaint filed against individuals who depicted the Indian national flag on a cake at a Christmas celebration event.
1) The complainant felt depicting the flag on a cake that was later cut and consumed amounted to insulting the national flag, which is an offense under Indian law. However, police initially refused to file an FIR.
2) The complainant then filed a petition with a judicial magistrate seeking an order directing police to file an FIR. The magistrate took cognizance of the complaint but then improperly reverted to using powers under a different section of criminal law to direct police to investigate.
3) The court hearing the challenge to the magistrate's order found that once cogniz
Saathik ali v state
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition in the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court to quash an FIR registered against him and others for conducting a peaceful demonstration against the CAA and NRC amendments. While there was prima facie evidence for an FIR, the court noted that no untoward incidents occurred during the peaceful protest. Since continued prosecution was not warranted given the lack of violence, the court quashed the FIR to secure the ends of justice, with the benefit also applying to the non-petitioning accused mentioned in the FIR.
Wajid v state of maharashtra
The court document discusses a criminal writ petition regarding a case where the police station claimed that their CCTV system was not working on the date in question. The court expresses skepticism about this claim, as it has heard similar claims from other police stations. It orders the District Superintendent of Police to investigate the specific case as well as the general procedures around maintaining CCTV systems and records at the police station. The Superintendent must submit a report by December 18th.
TN Police Constable Result 2017 Check Tamil Nadu TN Police Merit List Soon
TNUSRB Result 2017. Tamil Nadu Police Exam Result 2017 will be declared by the TNUSRB as soon as possible on the official website of Tamil Nadu Police Recruitment Board.
Rti dated 06.10.2018 against SC
The document details an RTI request filed by Om Prakash seeking information about the status of a criminal appeal petition he had filed with the Supreme Court of India regarding the suspicious death of Asha Rani Devi. The petition raised several defects that Mr. Prakash claims to have cured, but the registry is no longer responding to inquiries about the petition's status and the file seems to be missing. Through this RTI, Mr. Prakash is seeking a positive or negative reply from the registry on the registration of the criminal appeal and any actions taken regarding the petition.
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation o...
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 dated 30 January 2017
Mp hc order nov 3
Kausal Singh Masram filed an application for anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered under sections 292 of IPC and 67 of IT Act for posting a vulgar photograph of a reputed Indian leader on social media. The court notes that the applicant tagged 28 people and the post received 35 likes and 9 comments, indicating he was aware of the post. The applicant's complaint about the misuse of his ID was filed over two months later and during the bail application, so it cannot be believed. Given the applicant's act, the court finds he is not entitled to anticipatory bail and dismisses his application.
Henry tiphagne v state
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition to quash an FIR registered against him for conducting a peaceful protest against the CAA and NRC amendments. While the court acknowledged that there were grounds to register the FIR for public nuisance and traffic interference, it ruled that continuing the prosecution was not warranted since no violence or untoward incidents occurred. Noting that peaceful protests had been seen across India against the amendments, the court quashed the FIR and allowed the petition, with the benefit also applying to other non-petitioning accused in the case.
Ktaka hc manual scavenging order march 16
The High Court of Karnataka heard a case regarding compliance with the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013. The Court found that the State Government had not complied with most of the directions in the Court's previous order. The Court directed the State Government to file a detailed affidavit by April 20th regarding compliance with all directions. It also directed the State to ensure local authorities use modern technology to clean sewers and septic tanks as required by the Act.
Defects Cure letter dated 19.09.2018 to section x SC
The petitioner filed a misc. application that was objected to by the Branch Officer for including improper prayers B and C. The petitioner then redrafted those prayers and refiled the application. However, the Branch Officer is now instructing the petitioner over the phone to remove those key prayers from the application. The petitioner refuses to do so as it would invalidate the application. The petitioner questions why the application has not been properly processed or listed for hearing according to the rules.
First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...
First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Finally Department of Justice forwarded the complaint against felony of Registry of Supreme Court of India (which PMO had forwarded to DOJ) to Secretary General of Supreme Court of India.
Kerala hc ration order
The High Court of Kerala granted a stay on the operation of an order by the Chief Electoral Officer that deferred a proposal by the State of Kerala to distribute 10kg of rice at Rs. 15/kg to non-priority ration card holders in March and April 2021. The Court summarized the documents and arguments presented, and found that the proposal could not be prohibited by the model code of conduct as the decision for distribution was taken as early as February 4, 2021 based on the state budget and before the elections were contemplated. However, the Court specified the distribution must be done without any ostentatious functions that could influence voters.
Letter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CIC
The document is a memo from the Central Information Commission transferring a second appeal/complaint to the Bihar Information Commission. The memo explains that the original RTI filed with the Ministry of Law and Justice was transferred to the Patna Court and then to the Ld. CJM cum PIO of Begusarai District Court in Bihar. Similarly, the first appeal filed with the Patna High Court was transferred to the District and Sessions Judge of Begusarai Civil Court. As these public authorities fall under the jurisdiction of the Bihar Information Commission, the second appeal documents and additional documents from an earlier appeal are enclosed for requisite action.
RTI dated 22-03-2020 against Supreme Court of India
Opposite Parties in M.A. 583/2020 in W.P.(Criminal) are CORRUPT JUDGES, ADVOCATES and POLICE.
Biased Mentioning Officer of Supreme Court of India allowing Civil matters for listing during COVID 19 and Criminal matters are NOT CONSIDERED as URGENT MATTER
In_The_High_Court_Of_Judicature_At_..._vs_State_Rep._By_on_16_April,_2015.PDF
The petitioner sought a direction from the court to order the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a final report based on his complaint from December 2011. However, the court determined that the allegations of the wife suppressing her age and the marriage broker arranging the marriage were not appropriate for a court direction to the police. Instead, the court closed the case while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through the Family Court.
ERP-Based E-Gov System
This document proposes an ERP-based e-governance system for a municipal corporation to improve citizen service delivery and transparency. Key features include a web portal providing online services, a birth and death registration module, and an SMS query responder to allow citizens to interact with various departments. The system aims to computerize processes, reduce delays, and promote data sharing across departments to facilitate decision making.
Order dated 09.03.2018 against SC
Order of CIC is self explanatory as to how Central Registry of CIC is persisting criminal conspiracy against the Appellant and protecting the bad elements State Apparatus
Bombay high court suo moto pil
The High Court of Bombay initiated a Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation regarding the rise in COVID-19 cases in prisons in Maharashtra between March-April 2021. Newspaper reports noted that COVID cases among prisoners increased from 42 to over 200 within a month, and 86 prison staff also tested positive. While the state government had taken measures previously in 2020, the sudden spike requires renewed intervention. The court directed the state government respondents to provide updated information on the number of COVID cases among prisoners and staff, measures taken to control spread of the virus in prisons, and plans to decongest jails.
Decision of Department of Justice
Department of Justice refused to intervene into the felony of Registry of Supreme Court of India on the ground of "it does not come under the purview of D/o Justice as per allocation of business. Judicial matters are required to be taken up in the Court of Law"
Madras hc cbi judgment
The petition sought a writ of mandamus to transfer a case being investigated by the local police to the CBI for a fair investigation, citing lack of progress and credibility issues. The court noted the usual argument put forth by the CBI about lack of resources but felt a premier agency like the CBI should investigate sensitive cases impartially. However, the local police had made some progress by attaching properties and arresting accused, and were continuing their investigation. The court sought a status update from the police on the investigation.
Application for Written Arguments dated 05 06-2020 before Supreme Court of India
Parties in this Criminal Matter are CORRUPT, CRIMINAL, CROOK JUDGES, ADVOCATES POLICE and BANK OFFICIALS in M.A NO. 583 of 2020 in W.P.(Criminal) 136 of 2016 wherein rights under Article 21 of Constitution of India has been suspended through N.B.W u/s 83 Cr.Pc. causing jurisdictional error deliberately and secretly since 2011 by the State of Bihar and others and wherein Order dated 21.10.2016 in W.P.(Criminal) 136 of 2016 of Supreme Court of India has stood in breach of Article 21 of Constitution of India as a result of that the petitioner no.02 has succumbed to suspicious death on 11.11.2017 and petitioner no.01 is likely to succumb to suspicious death soon because the nexus of state and mafia has organized mob lynching and illegal detention of petitioner and has been compelled to remain underground by these corrupt, criminal, crook and goon’s organs of the state.
Madras hc bail caa mar 25 order
The petitioner, Jafar Sathick, filed a criminal original petition to quash the FIR registered against him in Crime No. 63 of 2020 by the Boothapandy Police Station. The FIR alleged that the petitioner organized a protest against amendments to the Citizenship Laws that caused public nuisance and hindered traffic. However, the court noted that the protest was peaceful with no untoward incidents. Since the investigation was almost complete, the court quashed the FIR against the petitioner while emphasizing the constitutional right to peaceful protest without arms.
More Related Content
What's hot
Saathik ali v state
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition in the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court to quash an FIR registered against him and others for conducting a peaceful demonstration against the CAA and NRC amendments. While there was prima facie evidence for an FIR, the court noted that no untoward incidents occurred during the peaceful protest. Since continued prosecution was not warranted given the lack of violence, the court quashed the FIR to secure the ends of justice, with the benefit also applying to the non-petitioning accused mentioned in the FIR.
Wajid v state of maharashtra
The court document discusses a criminal writ petition regarding a case where the police station claimed that their CCTV system was not working on the date in question. The court expresses skepticism about this claim, as it has heard similar claims from other police stations. It orders the District Superintendent of Police to investigate the specific case as well as the general procedures around maintaining CCTV systems and records at the police station. The Superintendent must submit a report by December 18th.
TN Police Constable Result 2017 Check Tamil Nadu TN Police Merit List Soon
TNUSRB Result 2017. Tamil Nadu Police Exam Result 2017 will be declared by the TNUSRB as soon as possible on the official website of Tamil Nadu Police Recruitment Board.
Rti dated 06.10.2018 against SC
The document details an RTI request filed by Om Prakash seeking information about the status of a criminal appeal petition he had filed with the Supreme Court of India regarding the suspicious death of Asha Rani Devi. The petition raised several defects that Mr. Prakash claims to have cured, but the registry is no longer responding to inquiries about the petition's status and the file seems to be missing. Through this RTI, Mr. Prakash is seeking a positive or negative reply from the registry on the registration of the criminal appeal and any actions taken regarding the petition.
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation o...
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 dated 30 January 2017
Mp hc order nov 3
Kausal Singh Masram filed an application for anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered under sections 292 of IPC and 67 of IT Act for posting a vulgar photograph of a reputed Indian leader on social media. The court notes that the applicant tagged 28 people and the post received 35 likes and 9 comments, indicating he was aware of the post. The applicant's complaint about the misuse of his ID was filed over two months later and during the bail application, so it cannot be believed. Given the applicant's act, the court finds he is not entitled to anticipatory bail and dismisses his application.
Henry tiphagne v state
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition to quash an FIR registered against him for conducting a peaceful protest against the CAA and NRC amendments. While the court acknowledged that there were grounds to register the FIR for public nuisance and traffic interference, it ruled that continuing the prosecution was not warranted since no violence or untoward incidents occurred. Noting that peaceful protests had been seen across India against the amendments, the court quashed the FIR and allowed the petition, with the benefit also applying to other non-petitioning accused in the case.
Ktaka hc manual scavenging order march 16
The High Court of Karnataka heard a case regarding compliance with the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013. The Court found that the State Government had not complied with most of the directions in the Court's previous order. The Court directed the State Government to file a detailed affidavit by April 20th regarding compliance with all directions. It also directed the State to ensure local authorities use modern technology to clean sewers and septic tanks as required by the Act.
Defects Cure letter dated 19.09.2018 to section x SC
The petitioner filed a misc. application that was objected to by the Branch Officer for including improper prayers B and C. The petitioner then redrafted those prayers and refiled the application. However, the Branch Officer is now instructing the petitioner over the phone to remove those key prayers from the application. The petitioner refuses to do so as it would invalidate the application. The petitioner questions why the application has not been properly processed or listed for hearing according to the rules.
First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...
First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Finally Department of Justice forwarded the complaint against felony of Registry of Supreme Court of India (which PMO had forwarded to DOJ) to Secretary General of Supreme Court of India.
Kerala hc ration order
The High Court of Kerala granted a stay on the operation of an order by the Chief Electoral Officer that deferred a proposal by the State of Kerala to distribute 10kg of rice at Rs. 15/kg to non-priority ration card holders in March and April 2021. The Court summarized the documents and arguments presented, and found that the proposal could not be prohibited by the model code of conduct as the decision for distribution was taken as early as February 4, 2021 based on the state budget and before the elections were contemplated. However, the Court specified the distribution must be done without any ostentatious functions that could influence voters.
Letter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CIC
The document is a memo from the Central Information Commission transferring a second appeal/complaint to the Bihar Information Commission. The memo explains that the original RTI filed with the Ministry of Law and Justice was transferred to the Patna Court and then to the Ld. CJM cum PIO of Begusarai District Court in Bihar. Similarly, the first appeal filed with the Patna High Court was transferred to the District and Sessions Judge of Begusarai Civil Court. As these public authorities fall under the jurisdiction of the Bihar Information Commission, the second appeal documents and additional documents from an earlier appeal are enclosed for requisite action.
RTI dated 22-03-2020 against Supreme Court of India
Opposite Parties in M.A. 583/2020 in W.P.(Criminal) are CORRUPT JUDGES, ADVOCATES and POLICE.
Biased Mentioning Officer of Supreme Court of India allowing Civil matters for listing during COVID 19 and Criminal matters are NOT CONSIDERED as URGENT MATTER
In_The_High_Court_Of_Judicature_At_..._vs_State_Rep._By_on_16_April,_2015.PDF
The petitioner sought a direction from the court to order the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a final report based on his complaint from December 2011. However, the court determined that the allegations of the wife suppressing her age and the marriage broker arranging the marriage were not appropriate for a court direction to the police. Instead, the court closed the case while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through the Family Court.
ERP-Based E-Gov System
This document proposes an ERP-based e-governance system for a municipal corporation to improve citizen service delivery and transparency. Key features include a web portal providing online services, a birth and death registration module, and an SMS query responder to allow citizens to interact with various departments. The system aims to computerize processes, reduce delays, and promote data sharing across departments to facilitate decision making.
Order dated 09.03.2018 against SC
Order of CIC is self explanatory as to how Central Registry of CIC is persisting criminal conspiracy against the Appellant and protecting the bad elements State Apparatus
Bombay high court suo moto pil
The High Court of Bombay initiated a Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation regarding the rise in COVID-19 cases in prisons in Maharashtra between March-April 2021. Newspaper reports noted that COVID cases among prisoners increased from 42 to over 200 within a month, and 86 prison staff also tested positive. While the state government had taken measures previously in 2020, the sudden spike requires renewed intervention. The court directed the state government respondents to provide updated information on the number of COVID cases among prisoners and staff, measures taken to control spread of the virus in prisons, and plans to decongest jails.
Decision of Department of Justice
Department of Justice refused to intervene into the felony of Registry of Supreme Court of India on the ground of "it does not come under the purview of D/o Justice as per allocation of business. Judicial matters are required to be taken up in the Court of Law"
What's hot (19)
TN Police Constable Result 2017 Check Tamil Nadu TN Police Merit List Soon
TN Police Constable Result 2017 Check Tamil Nadu TN Police Merit List Soon
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation o...
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation o...
Defects Cure letter dated 19.09.2018 to section x SC
Defects Cure letter dated 19.09.2018 to section x SC
First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...
First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Letter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CIC
Letter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CIC
RTI dated 22-03-2020 against Supreme Court of India
RTI dated 22-03-2020 against Supreme Court of India
In_The_High_Court_Of_Judicature_At_..._vs_State_Rep._By_on_16_April,_2015.PDF
In_The_High_Court_Of_Judicature_At_..._vs_State_Rep._By_on_16_April,_2015.PDF
Similar to Madras hc march 1 order
Madras hc cbi judgment
The petition sought a writ of mandamus to transfer a case being investigated by the local police to the CBI for a fair investigation, citing lack of progress and credibility issues. The court noted the usual argument put forth by the CBI about lack of resources but felt a premier agency like the CBI should investigate sensitive cases impartially. However, the local police had made some progress by attaching properties and arresting accused, and were continuing their investigation. The court sought a status update from the police on the investigation.
Application for Written Arguments dated 05 06-2020 before Supreme Court of India
Parties in this Criminal Matter are CORRUPT, CRIMINAL, CROOK JUDGES, ADVOCATES POLICE and BANK OFFICIALS in M.A NO. 583 of 2020 in W.P.(Criminal) 136 of 2016 wherein rights under Article 21 of Constitution of India has been suspended through N.B.W u/s 83 Cr.Pc. causing jurisdictional error deliberately and secretly since 2011 by the State of Bihar and others and wherein Order dated 21.10.2016 in W.P.(Criminal) 136 of 2016 of Supreme Court of India has stood in breach of Article 21 of Constitution of India as a result of that the petitioner no.02 has succumbed to suspicious death on 11.11.2017 and petitioner no.01 is likely to succumb to suspicious death soon because the nexus of state and mafia has organized mob lynching and illegal detention of petitioner and has been compelled to remain underground by these corrupt, criminal, crook and goon’s organs of the state.
Madras hc bail caa mar 25 order
The petitioner, Jafar Sathick, filed a criminal original petition to quash the FIR registered against him in Crime No. 63 of 2020 by the Boothapandy Police Station. The FIR alleged that the petitioner organized a protest against amendments to the Citizenship Laws that caused public nuisance and hindered traffic. However, the court noted that the protest was peaceful with no untoward incidents. Since the investigation was almost complete, the court quashed the FIR against the petitioner while emphasizing the constitutional right to peaceful protest without arms.
Madras hc jan 21 order
1) The petitioner, M. Ananthan, was arrested in 2018 for drug offenses involving commercial quantities of ganja and has been in judicial custody since.
2) While the petitioner satisfies one requirement for bail under the NDPS Act by not having a criminal record, the court found he did not satisfy the second requirement that he is not likely to have committed the offense based on evidence.
3) However, the court determined the petitioner's right to a speedy trial had been violated as the trial had not commenced for over two years. As such, the court directed the prosecution to pay compensation of Rs. 1 lakh and for the trial to conclude within three months.
Gauri lankesh case final slp regarding accused number 6 (1)
The document appears to be a petition filed in the Supreme Court of India challenging a high court order related to the investigation and prosecution of a murder case. Specifically, it challenges an order that quashed the sanction order and supplementary charge sheet filed against an accused, Mohan Nayak, under the Karnataka Control of Organised Crime Act for his alleged involvement in the 2017 murder of journalist Gauri Lankesh. The petitioner argues the high court failed to properly examine the relevant provisions and facts of the case in quashing the sanction order and invokes the court's jurisdiction to do justice in this high-profile murder case.
M.A.D.No.15192 dated 20.07.2020 before Supreme Court of India
Last Posthumous Petition filed along with Petitioner no.02 Srmt. Asha Rani Devi against in-built corruption in Law Enforcement agencies which explains as to how Custodian of Law became the killer of Petitioner no.02 Srmt. Asha Rani Devi and remained unpunished till date.
Petition 242 of 2021.pdf
The writ petition concerns a case of alleged child sexual abuse, forced hidden prostitution of minor girls, human trafficking, and illicit sex trade reported by the petitioner whistleblower to authorities. The petitioner reported the incident to the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights on 12th April 2021. On 13th April 2021, an official from NCPCR responded requesting more details from the petitioner within 3 days to take immediate action. However, the petitioner alleges he was unlawfully detained by Delhi Police for blowing the whistle on the case and filing reports to rescue and rehabilitate the minor victims. He now seeks intervention from the Supreme Court under Article 32.
Petition against child sexual abuse and hidden prostitution before Supreme Co...
North East Delhi, Shastri Park area
Complete petition against busting International Sex racket in W.P.(Crl.) 242/2021 before Supreme Court of India.
madras high court judgment.pdf
The document is a court order from the High Court of Judicature at Madras regarding two criminal appeals related to an investigation into an alleged LTTE plot to siphon money from a bank account in India.
The court summarizes the facts of the case, including the arrest of the appellants for allegedly attempting to fraudulently withdraw money from the bank account for the benefit of the LTTE. The appellants challenged the extension of their remand period.
The court examines the relevant laws and procedures. It finds that the investigating agency had filed a proper report as required by law for an extension, and that the accused are not legally entitled to a copy of such a report or to a hearing on the extension.
Complaint Document of Widow Asha Rani Devi to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of In...
The document is a complaint filed with the Chief Justice of India alleging planned judicial murder by the Supreme Court of India. It summarizes a long-running legal dispute involving two states and multiple cases related to property and domestic issues. It alleges bias and impropriety and requests intervention into reversing judicial orders and allowing a pending petition to be heard regarding cancellation of legal notices and relief from ongoing criminal cases.
Interlocutory Application dated 9.10.22 for Cancellation of NBW before SC.pdf
Recall the order dated 25.08.2010 and 08.09.2011, whereby Non-Bailaible Warrants were issued against the petitioner Om Prakash and his mother Asha Rani Devi by Begusarai Court under the judicature of Patna High Court in 9-P/2010 and 397c/2011 (Criminal Case Complaint (P) no. 5591/2013) case and Cancel the Non-Bailaible Warrants issued against the Petitioner and his mother to eradicate Prostitution and International Sex Racket.
Application (I.A.No.164340) for Non Bailable Warrant dated 01.11.2022 SC.pdf
Non Bailable Warrant issued kept secret and maintained since 2010 to confiscate my Property, to push my families into prostitution and to kill my parents including me.
Second Appeal dated 06 04 2017 against SC before CIC New Delhi
Second Appeal vide D.NO. 122864 dated 06.04.2017 before CIC New Delhi against Registrar Supreme Court of India for refusal of Registration of Writ (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017 entitled "OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS"
E.mohanammal
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking police protection from the third respondent and his brother who were interfering with her property possession and threatening her. However, the court dismissed the petition stating that there is a pending civil dispute between the petitioner and third respondent regarding the same property. The court noted that the police cannot interfere unless directed by the civil court handling the property dispute case. The petitioner was given liberty to seek appropriate remedies from the lower civil court, including police protection or initiating contempt proceedings.
Kerala hc no cash deposit
This document is a court order from the High Court of Kerala regarding a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner was granted bail by the Sessions Court but was ordered to deposit Rs. 25,000 towards a Corona Relief Fund. The High Court quashes this condition, finding that courts cannot direct accused persons to make cash deposits for bail. However, the petitioner must still comply with all other bail conditions. Due to Covid-19 restrictions, the Court also directs police to allow the petitioner and sureties to travel to execute the bail bond.
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
This document summarizes a court case in Mumbai, India involving 10 individuals from Indonesia who were charged with violating lockdown orders issued due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The prosecution presented evidence from two witnesses, police officers who discovered the individuals at a local mosque on April 5, 2020, allegedly in violation of restrictions. The defense disputed the evidence and cited other court rulings that discharged defendants in similar cases. The judge considered the arguments from both sides to determine if the prosecution had sufficiently proven their case.
delhi court acquittal delhi riots order.pdf
The document is a court judgment from the Court of Sh. Pulastya Pramachala, Additional Sessions Judge-03, North-East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in the case of State v. Mohd. Shahnawaz @ Shanu etc. involving charges of rioting and arson. Four accused were charged but all were acquitted. The judgment provides details of the charges, evidence presented, and arguments of the prosecution and defense. It finds that the identification of the accused was not proven and acquits all accused persons.
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017
Additional documents against Second Appeal vide D.No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016 being filed vide D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017 before CIC New Delhi along with FAA, District & Session Judge's reply.
Brinda karat and anr. v. state and anr. (defects cleared)
The petitioners have challenged an order passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate dismissing their application under Section 156(3) of the CrPC seeking investigation and registration of an FIR for alleged hate speech by two Members of Parliament. The Magistrate held that prior sanction under Section 196 CrPC was required at this initial stage, which was not obtained. The petitioners argue that sanction is only required at the stage of cognizance, not investigation under Section 156(3). They further argue that the cases relied upon by the Magistrate are distinguishable and that requiring sanction at this stage would hamper access to justice. The petitioners seek quashing of the impugned order and issuance of directions.
Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal before Supreme Court of India vide D...
Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal by way of motion against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 along with Affidavit and Annexures P-1 to P-5 filed before Supreme Court of India vide D.NO. 45930 dated 05.06.2017
Similar to Madras hc march 1 order (20)
Application for Written Arguments dated 05 06-2020 before Supreme Court of India
Application for Written Arguments dated 05 06-2020 before Supreme Court of India
Gauri lankesh case final slp regarding accused number 6 (1)
Gauri lankesh case final slp regarding accused number 6 (1)
M.A.D.No.15192 dated 20.07.2020 before Supreme Court of India
M.A.D.No.15192 dated 20.07.2020 before Supreme Court of India
Petition against child sexual abuse and hidden prostitution before Supreme Co...
Petition against child sexual abuse and hidden prostitution before Supreme Co...
Complaint Document of Widow Asha Rani Devi to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of In...
Complaint Document of Widow Asha Rani Devi to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of In...
Interlocutory Application dated 9.10.22 for Cancellation of NBW before SC.pdf
Interlocutory Application dated 9.10.22 for Cancellation of NBW before SC.pdf
Application (I.A.No.164340) for Non Bailable Warrant dated 01.11.2022 SC.pdf
Application (I.A.No.164340) for Non Bailable Warrant dated 01.11.2022 SC.pdf
Second Appeal dated 06 04 2017 against SC before CIC New Delhi
Second Appeal dated 06 04 2017 against SC before CIC New Delhi
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017
Brinda karat and anr. v. state and anr. (defects cleared)
Brinda karat and anr. v. state and anr. (defects cleared)
Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal before Supreme Court of India vide D...
Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal before Supreme Court of India vide D...
More from ZahidManiyar
Letter to-dgp-18 oct21
1. The families of prisoners held in Taloja Central Prison and Byculla Women's Prison wrote a letter regarding the discontinuation of weekly telephone interviews for family members when physical visits resume.
2. They expressed concern that discontinuing phone calls would cause problems for out-of-town family members who cannot easily travel to Mumbai for physical visits, as well as economically weak and elderly relatives.
3. The letter requested that phone interviews be allowed to continue in a hybrid model, where Mumbai-based relatives could choose a physical or phone visit, to ensure prisoners' right to communicate with family and advocates as guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.
Tripura hc order
The High Court of Tripura issued an order directing the State of Tripura Aids Control Society to be impleaded as a respondent. The State and Union of India were directed to issue guidelines to conduct a thorough research of all persons in State prisons to ascertain if any are infected with HIV. If any infected persons are found, necessary action must be taken for their treatment and care in accordance with law to prevent an epidemic. A report on the matter must be submitted to the court by November 9, 2021. The court also requested an Amicus Curiae to assist and oversee the matter.
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
This document summarizes an incident of communal violence and vigilantism in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. It discusses the history of communal tensions and riots in Meerut dating back to the 1930s. On September 20, 2017, two members of the Jehovah's Witnesses religious group were invited into a Hindu man's home but then detained against their will for over an hour, assaulted, and handed over to the police with false allegations of forced conversion efforts. The police refused to register a complaint about the assault and illegally detained the victims overnight without medical treatment. The document analyzes this incident as an example of the shift in India to smaller scale vigilantism targeting religious minorities, with the tacit support
Christians under attack_in_india_report
The document provides a summary of attacks on Christians in India, including two specific incidents in Roorkee and Mau, Uttar Pradesh:
1) In Roorkee, a mob of 250-300 people attacked a church, injuring several attendees. Police did not provide security despite prior complaints.
2) In Mau, a mob accused Christians of conversion during a prayer meeting. Seven people including the pastor were arrested under anti-conversion laws.
It also lists other incidents of threats, violence and false accusations against Christians in various parts of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and other states, indicating growing targeted attacks against the Christian minority in India.
Sharjeel imam vs state
The document discusses an application for bail filed by Sharjeel Imam. It summarizes the key details of the case, including the charges against Imam related to speeches he delivered on December 13th and 15th, 2019 regarding protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. While the prosecution argues Imam's speeches incited violence, the judge found the evidence linking Imam's speeches to subsequent acts of violence by co-accused to be scanty and inconclusive. The judge granted Imam bail for offenses related to inciting violence but will further examine charges of sedition against Imam.
Sharjeel imam vs state
The document discusses a bail application hearing for Sharjeel Imam. It summarizes the key details of the case, including the charges against Imam related to speeches he delivered on December 13th and 15th, 2019 regarding protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. It notes that while the prosecution argues Imam's speeches incited violence, the defense argues there is no evidence linking Imam's words to any criminal acts. In its ruling, the court finds the evidence against Imam for abetting offenses to be insufficient and scanty.
Ramesh kumar order
This document summarizes a court case revision petition hearing. The judge stayed the operation of the previous court order from October 12, 2021 until the next hearing date of November 12, 2021. The revision petition notice was ordered to be issued to the respondents. The trial court record was reviewed and the special public prosecutor and police inspector were present to provide submissions.
Cmm order
This document is a court order from a case involving multiple accused persons. It summarizes proceedings from a hearing where the prosecution requested more time for further investigation into the case. The court allowed more time but imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 to be split among the accused, noting delays in the investigation. It also ordered the Secretary of Home Affairs to inquire about responsibility for the costs being imposed and deducting the amount from the responsible officer's salary. The case was adjourned to a future date for further proceedings.
Archbishop --press-statement
The Archbishop of Bangalore expresses concern over the Karnataka government's plan to survey Christian missionaries and places of worship. He argues that such surveys could unfairly target and endanger the Christian community. The Archbishop questions why only Christians are being surveyed, noting that Christians constitute a small percentage of the population. He calls on the government to respect constitutional protections of religious freedom and consider the educational and social services provided by Christian institutions instead of pursuing anti-conversion policies.
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
The complaint alleges that a Muslim family in Indore, Madhya Pradesh was attacked by a mob of 150 people associated with the RSS on October 9, 2021. The family was threatened and told to leave the village. Family members sustained head injuries and their house was ransacked. The police delayed registering an FIR and instead filed a counter-complaint against the family. The complaint cites other recent incidents of violence and harassment against Muslims in Indore and calls on the National Commission for Minorities to investigate and take action to prevent further attacks.
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
The complaint alleges that on October 10, 2021 in Mau, Uttar Pradesh, two incidents occurred where Christian religious gatherings were disrupted by Hindu nationalist mobs. In one incident, two nuns were attacked, dragged to the police station and detained for hours on baseless allegations of religious conversion. In another incident, a Christian prayer service was raided and the pastor and congregants were taken to the police station. The complaint urges the National Commission for Minorities to investigate these attacks, ensure protection for religious minorities, condemn the attacks and pressure authorities to take swift action. It notes a pattern of increasing attacks on Christians in India by Hindu nationalist groups.
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
1. Citizens for Justice and Peace wrote to the National Commission for Minorities regarding two attacks on Christians in Mau, Uttar Pradesh on October 10, 2021. In the first incident, a mob attacked two nuns and their driver at a bus stand and took them to the police station. In the second incident, a mob disrupted a Christian prayer service and took the pastor and worshippers to the police station.
2. The letter requests that the Commission conduct an inquiry into the attacks, ensure protection for religious minorities, condemn the attacks and urge police to take action, and issue guidelines for dealing with communally motivated attacks. It argues that such attacks violate constitutional rights and aim to subjugate minority communities through fear.
Aiufwp eia response (1) converted
The document is a response letter from the All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP) regarding the draft EIA Notification 2020. The key points made in the letter are:
1) The AIUFWP demands a complete withdrawal of the draft EIA Notification 2020 as it weakens environmental protections and public participation in decision making.
2) The draft was released during a national lockdown without proper accessibility or consideration of forest communities who will be most impacted.
3) Weakening environmental regulations could exacerbate future pandemics by further damaging nature.
4) The draft favors industries and projects over environmental protection by reducing scrutiny and exempting many from public hearings and consent requirements.
Maulana fazlul order
The applicant Maulana Fazlul Karim Qasimi was arrested in August 2021 for a Facebook post expressing the view that the Taliban in Afghanistan are not terrorists. The applicant's lawyer argued that the court had granted bail to someone in a similar case for expressing such an opinion. While reviewing the case diary, the court found nothing incriminating against the applicant beyond the Facebook post. Given the lack of other evidence, the court doubted if the post alone constituted a cognizable offense. Therefore, the court directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a bond, finding further custody unnecessary in this case.
Maqbool alam order
The document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a bail application filed by Maqbool Alam, who was charged with several offenses including praising a terrorist organization on Facebook. The court heard arguments from Alam's lawyer and the public prosecutor. Upon reviewing the Facebook posts and finding that they did not require further custodial interrogation, the court granted bail to Alam subject to furnishing a bond and ensuring he does not interfere with the investigation.
Kerala hc order d rajagopal-v-ayyappan-anr-402210
This document summarizes two criminal revision petitions filed in the High Court of Kerala against judgments from lower courts. The lower courts had found police officers guilty of assaulting a complainant while he was in custody. The police officers argue on appeal that the lower courts erred in not requiring sanction from the state government before prosecuting public servants. The High Court examines the evidence and finds that the injuries occurred while the complainant was in police custody, supporting his allegation that police assaulted him at the police station lockup. Medical evidence also supports the complainant's version of events. The High Court dismisses the criminal revision petitions filed by the police officers.
Kpss security of kp's - 05.10.2021
The Kashmiri Pandit Sangarash Samiti (KPSS) wrote a letter to the Lieutenant Governor of Jammu and Kashmir regarding the security of non-migrant Kashmiri Pandits and Hindus living in the Kashmir Valley. KPSS has submitted communications over the past year requesting a meeting about this issue, but their requests have been ignored. Over the past 10 days, intelligence reports indicate prominent Kashmiri Pandit/Hindu businessmen will be targeted, and one was killed on October 5th. KPSS warns that if another Pandit/Hindu is killed due to administrative and security failures, they will file a petition with the International Human Rights Commission and launch a signature campaign against the administration for neglect
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
The Central Trade Unions strongly condemned the killing of farmers protesting in Lakhimpur Kheri, Uttar Pradesh. They demanded the resignation of the Minister of State for Home and stringent punishment for the culprits. The trade unions also condemned the police for preventing opposition leaders and union leaders from visiting the families of the deceased. They reiterated their support for farmers in their struggle against the farm laws.
Allahabad hc wpil(a) 1585 2021
This document summarizes a court order from a Public Interest Litigation case in the State of Uttar Pradesh, India. The order lists several related cases to be heard together on October 22nd. It notes that two specific cases were not listed as directed in a previous order and threatens action against the responsible registry officer. It also directs the respondents to provide the petitioner's counsel a copy of the counter affidavit filed in connected writ petitions.
Mp hc wp 9320 2021_order_30-sep-2021
The document discusses two writ petitions related to prison overcrowding and conditions in Madhya Pradesh. It summarizes the suggestions provided by an amicus curiae to improve prison conditions, which include establishing women's prisons, borstal schools for youth offenders, mental health services, vocational training programs, healthcare facilities, sanitation infrastructure, educational opportunities, and recreational activities for inmates. The court acknowledges the urgent need for prison reforms and decongesting the prisons in the state.
More from ZahidManiyar (20)
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
Recently uploaded
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
भारत सरकार द्वारा बड़े पैमाने पर व्हाट्सएप अभियान चलाए जाने से डेटा गोपनीयता, नैतिकता और चुनावों की निष्पक्षता पर सवाल उठते हैं।
Recently uploaded (9)
Madras hc march 1 order
- 1. 1 Crl.O.P.No.3965 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 01.03.2021 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.No.3965 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.No.2389 of 2021 S.Devika .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The State, Rep. by The Inspector of Police, J5, Sastri Nagar Police Station, Besant Nagar, Chennai 600 090 2. Mr.K.Palavesam Inspector of Police, J5, Sastri Nagar Police Station, Besant Nagar, Chennai -600 090. .. Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records in C.C.No.760 of 2020 pending on the file of the learnd IX Metropolitan Magistrate's Court, Saidapet, Chennai quash the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
- 2. 2 Crl.O.P.No.3965 of 2021 same. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arun For Respondent No.1 : Mr.C.Raghavan Government Advocate ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.760 of 2020, on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate's Court, Saidapet, Chennai. 2.The facts of this case is covered by the reported Judgments of this Court in Jeevanandham and others Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police and another reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 606 and Sri Raja Vs. State Rep. By Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District, and another reported in (2019) 2 LW Crl 350. 3. In the Considered view of this Court, no offence has been made out against the petitioner. That apart, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the Government has taken a policy decision that all https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
- 3. 3 Crl.O.P.No.3965 of 2021 the cases that were registered against those who indulged in protest against the amendment to Citizenship Act, is going to be withdrawn by the State. In view of the above, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the proceedings pending in C.C.No.760, on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate's Court, Saidapet, Chennai and the same is hereby quashed. 4.This Criminal Original Petition is accordingly allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 01.03.2021 Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No rka To 1. The Inspector of Police, J5, Sastri Nagar Police Station, Besant Nagar, Chennai 600 090 2. Mr.K.Palavesam Inspector of Police, J5, Sastri Nagar Police Station, Besant Nagar, Chennai -600 090. N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
- 4. 4 Crl.O.P.No.3965 of 2021 rka Crl.O.P.No.3965 of 2021 01.03.2021 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/