This document is a second appeal filed with the Central Information Commission regarding information requested under the Right to Information Act. The appellant had previously filed requests for information from the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Begusarai regarding two court cases there. In the second appeal, the appellant argues that the responses received contained false or incomplete information, and requests that true and complete information be provided regarding details of the two court cases.
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017Om Prakash Poddar
Additional documents against Second Appeal vide D.No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016 being filed vide D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017 before CIC New Delhi along with FAA, District & Session Judge's reply.
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016Om Prakash Poddar
True Copy of Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 filed before Supreme Court of India dated 30th August 2016 against the State of Bihar for Quashing of criminal complaint case(P) 5591 of 2013 pending at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai CJM division Bihar.
The Right to Information Act, 2005 has been subverted most blatantly and with impunity by the information commissioners appointed to enforce the very same law. Here is an e mail I had sent to Sharat Sabarwal, one such information commissioner at the Central Information Commission. This feedback on one of his orders amply illustrates how the law is being subverted by some of the worst traitors in the world!
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supr...Om Prakash Poddar
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supreme Court of India for refusal to register Writ (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017Om Prakash Poddar
Additional documents against Second Appeal vide D.No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016 being filed vide D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017 before CIC New Delhi along with FAA, District & Session Judge's reply.
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016Om Prakash Poddar
True Copy of Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 filed before Supreme Court of India dated 30th August 2016 against the State of Bihar for Quashing of criminal complaint case(P) 5591 of 2013 pending at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai CJM division Bihar.
The Right to Information Act, 2005 has been subverted most blatantly and with impunity by the information commissioners appointed to enforce the very same law. Here is an e mail I had sent to Sharat Sabarwal, one such information commissioner at the Central Information Commission. This feedback on one of his orders amply illustrates how the law is being subverted by some of the worst traitors in the world!
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supr...Om Prakash Poddar
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supreme Court of India for refusal to register Writ (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017
First appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Registrar (J-I) Supreme Court of Indi...Om Prakash Poddar
First appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Registrar (J-I) Supreme Court of India for REFUSAL OF REGISTRATION OF WRIT CRIMINAL AGAINST UNION OF INDIA D.NO.2188 OF 2017
Aggrieved by the reply of Adl. Registrar & CPIO, Supreme Court of India dated 04.03.2017, appellant preferred First Appeal against CPIO of Supreme Court of India dated 07.03.2017 before Ld. Registrar (Admin) & First Appellate Authority (FAA) Supreme Court of India at New Delhi.
IS IT NOT A WELL DESIGNED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY BY THE REGISTRAR SECTION X OF S...Om Prakash Poddar
Certified copy of office report dated 20.10.2016 in writ petition criminal 136 of 2016 issued by registrar section x of supreme court of India along with applications with Affidavit dated 03.10.16 & 18.10.16
This is a complaint I had filed for the Public Contact Program of the Chief minister of Kerala scheduled to held at Palakkad on 13 Jun 2015. It is against the office of the Chief Minister of Kerala himself.
The only pro-democracy, citizen friendly law, the Right to Information Act, has been subverted blatantly by the very information commissioners who have been appointed at exorbitant cost to the exchequer to enforce it. Here is another example of such subversion by none other than the Chief Information Commissioner of Kerala, Vinson M Paul, former DGP and Direcor Vigilance of the State.
First appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Registrar (J-I) Supreme Court of Indi...Om Prakash Poddar
First appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Registrar (J-I) Supreme Court of India for REFUSAL OF REGISTRATION OF WRIT CRIMINAL AGAINST UNION OF INDIA D.NO.2188 OF 2017
Aggrieved by the reply of Adl. Registrar & CPIO, Supreme Court of India dated 04.03.2017, appellant preferred First Appeal against CPIO of Supreme Court of India dated 07.03.2017 before Ld. Registrar (Admin) & First Appellate Authority (FAA) Supreme Court of India at New Delhi.
IS IT NOT A WELL DESIGNED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY BY THE REGISTRAR SECTION X OF S...Om Prakash Poddar
Certified copy of office report dated 20.10.2016 in writ petition criminal 136 of 2016 issued by registrar section x of supreme court of India along with applications with Affidavit dated 03.10.16 & 18.10.16
This is a complaint I had filed for the Public Contact Program of the Chief minister of Kerala scheduled to held at Palakkad on 13 Jun 2015. It is against the office of the Chief Minister of Kerala himself.
The only pro-democracy, citizen friendly law, the Right to Information Act, has been subverted blatantly by the very information commissioners who have been appointed at exorbitant cost to the exchequer to enforce it. Here is another example of such subversion by none other than the Chief Information Commissioner of Kerala, Vinson M Paul, former DGP and Direcor Vigilance of the State.
Continuous Delivery is een trend. Veel bedrijven hebben het over Contnuous Delivery maar wat wordt hier eigenlijk mee bedoeld? En belangrijker nog, wat moet er allemaal gedaan worden om te komen tot Continuous Delivery? En hoe moet ik dit allemaal managen? Met de komst van Visual Studio Release Management heeft Microsoft de toolset van Team Foundation Server nog verder uitgebreid. TFS 2013 bevat hierdoor een rijke set aan tools die kunnen ondersteunen in de uitrol van Continuous Delivery. Denk hierbij niet alleen aan Release Managament, maar ook aan het Scrum Process, Automated Builds, Continuous Integration en Automated Testing. In deze sessie worden de belangrijkste aspecten rondom Continuous Delivery behandeld en zullen de diverse tools die hierbij kunnen ondersteunen, waaronder VS Release Management, worden gedemonstreerd.
Retaxis provides an e-commerce web design services for designer jewelry store in India. For more information log on to www.retaxis.com or drop me an email at info@retaxis.com
An infographic illustrating what it takes to build one of the world's most successful brands and the world's most valuable sports brands. NIKE's success is reflected in its strong share price performance over the last decade.
An introduction to thematic investing and why it's a good idea to invest in tomorrow's trends today. Insights shared by AtlasTrend on investing in world trends - what is trend investing, why it's a good idea and is it profitable.
How to Make Awesome SlideShares: Tips & TricksSlideShare
Turbocharge your online presence with SlideShare. We provide the best tips and tricks for succeeding on SlideShare. Get ideas for what to upload, tips for designing your deck and more.
Department of Justice Government of India forwarded RTI request bearing registration No.
JUSTC/R/2018/51094 to Patna High Court on 05.06.2018 for necessary action.
RTI dated 22.04.2018 against Department of Justice Om Prakash Poddar
Since matter is same and jurisdictions of two states are involved into it and the same matter has been settled by the Hon ble High Court of Delhi in MATT. APPL. 7 of 2012 on 23.07.2013 and Appellant Number 02 SMT. ASHA RANI DEV has been succumbed to planned judicial murder on 11.11.2017 and Appellant No.01 has become underground due to imminent danger to his “Life & liberty” therefore Department of Justice is the competent authority to supply complete information.This is with reference to RTI reply memo No. 438 dated 27.08.2016 by C.J.M Cum PIO and FAA reply memo no.4036 dated 20.09.2017 by District & Session Judge Cum Appellate Authority Civil Courts Begusarai under the judicature of Patna High Court
Second appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Department of legal affairs dated 3....Om Prakash Poddar
Second Appeal under RTI Act 2005 filed before Central Information Commission (CIC), New Delhi upon refusal to supply information by First Appellate Authority Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law & Justice, Government of India & Law Department, Government of Bihar vide diary no. 183721 dated 03.11.2016
RTI dated 31.05.2018 against Department of Justice even after letter addressed to Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India in W.P. (CRIMINAL) 136 of 2016 vide D.NO.78087 dated 23.05.2018 has been filed before Supreme Court of India
Decision announced by CIC New Delhi against District & Sessions Judge-Cum-Appellate Authority Civil Court Begusarai under the Judicature of Patna High Court for Non-Compliance RTI Act 2005
RTI dated 7.12.22 against suppression of Gang Rape matter.pdfOmPrakashPoddar1
Supreme Court of India is main accused in Non Bail able Warrant and Gang Rape matter W.P.(Crl.) D.NO. 18546/2022. Sixteen petitions (SLP. Writ, Review, Curative and M.A) have been filed against interlinked with this matter since 2012 to till date, yet no rescue of 18 year ago kidnapped pregnant wife Rina Kumari (Guddi) and abducted unseen minor daughter from the clutches of sex Abusers State by Supreme Court of India and Union of India as on date
Second Appeal dated 06 04 2017 against SC before CIC New DelhiOm Prakash Poddar
Second Appeal vide D.NO. 122864 dated 06.04.2017 before CIC New Delhi against Registrar Supreme Court of India for refusal of Registration of Writ (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017 entitled "OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS"
The Right to Information Act, 2005 has been subverted most blatantly and with impunity by the information commissioners appointed to enforce the very same law. Here is a complaint I had sent to the President of India against Basant Seth, one such information commissioner at the Central Information Commission. This is of necessity somewhat long and would need your indulgence for quite some time!
Omaxe reviews - omaxe ltd. vs. roma international pvt. ltd.omaxe-reviews
Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot with ladies.Omaxe Reviews get lot of hits on omaxe reviews official omaxe reviews introducing omaxe reviews and Mr. Anil Kumar get set go. Omaxe Reviews at next month but all over get hot.
Reply to Election Commission Delhi in NGS5322435639 dated 25.11.2022.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
ERO Ms. Sunita Raj mobile no. 9650058340 59-Vishwas Nagar Constituency Sahadra district at East Delhi has admitted this fact that she has sent her man for making a fake voters under the legal guardianship of Complainant on 24.11.2022 at Shelter Home DUSIB Code No.214 near Anand Vihar ISBT Delhi. Hence, your BLO will disclose the name and address of person for whom he wanted to make fake Voter ID with ulterior motives.
112 call has been made against your fraud BLO dated 24.11.2022 with unique reference no. 6161038, PCR Petrol Vehicle ROMO9A mobile no. 7428002509 at 19.32.34pm. Anand Vihar policeman mobile number is 8595888677. Police had taken him to the police station. Hence police has recorded his name and address and motives behind it.
Inquiry officer Balveer Singh mobile no. 9654963400 of Patpatganj Industrial Area Police Station near Anand Vihar ISBT Delhi will provide you the name and address of person who had come to make a fake voters under the legal guardianship of Complainant.
Your fraud BLO did not disclose his identity before complainant.
Complaint dated 27.11.2022 to Commissioner of Polic Delhi.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
TAKE the cognizance of obvious links between Ms. Sunita Raj, BLO Anand Vihar and Mr. Manish Raj with this International Sex Racket and direct to concern SHO to register an F.I.R against the accused under relevant sections of IPC.
112 call dated 24.11.2022 at 19.32.34pm with unique reference no. 6161038 and subsequent Complaint dated 25.11.2022 to the Commissioner of Police Delhi dated 25.11.2022 discloses links with Mr. Manish Raj son of Chief Minister of Jharkhand in this International Sex Racket
Suppression of crucial records in Office Report dated 26.11.2022 in W.P. (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 listed for hearing on 28.11.2022 before Chamber Judge HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, Court No.15 CL.NO.1748 may lead to dismissal of petition.
Registry has only recorded the records to defend its heinous work in the Office Report dated 26.11.2022 hiding all the factual crucial records filed by the petitioner even after his reminder though e-filed letter dated 22.11.2022 addressed to Branch Officer and Assistant Registrar Section X
Office Report dated 26.11.2022 in International Sex Racket matter Writ Petit...Om Prakash Poddar
Registry has recorded records in his favor only and has ignored the crucial records of petitioner deliberately to dismiss the petition by default.
Office Report dated 26.11.2022 for the hearing of Writ Petition Criminal Diary No. 18646/2022 on 28.11.2022 has been made hiding the crucial records filed by the petitioner.
Office Report dated 28.11.2022 in International Sex Racket matter Writ Petit...Om Prakash Poddar
Office Report has been made hiding crucial records of petitioner. Registry has recorded his own record only and has deliberately ignored the record of petitioner to dismiss the petition by default.
Complaint dated 26.11.22 against Election Officer Katihar Bihar.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
a fake voter identity card has been created by BLO Part-220, Ward No.03, 64-Kadwa Constituency Katihar Bihar vide EPIC No. TYGO395244 against the Complainant. Complainant has figured out malpractices of BLO and submitted requisite form before BLO Gopal Malik mobile no. 9507949474 dated 17.12.2021 for deletion of his name from the voter list to suppress the practice of multiple voter identity cards across the Country.
Complaint dated 25.11.22 against Election Officer Sahadra Delhi.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
Sex abuser Manish from Election Commission Delhi took my Aadhar Card by fraud to make Voter ID for my kidnapped minor daughter marking me as a legal guardian under Vishwas Nagar Constituency at Sahadra district of East Delhi.
Praying from you to direct the registry to supply the fixed date of hearing to the petitioner in person in writing in Non Bailable and Gang Rape matter W.P. Criminal Diary No. 18546/2022 so that he can plan his travel for home
Letter dated 22.11.2022 to Branch Officer Section 10 at Supreme Court of Ind...Om Prakash Poddar
Take all 84 e-filed legal documents with effect from 07.06.2022 to 22.11.2022 along with physical filed legal document with effect from 14.06.2022 to till date on Record of office report for the date of hearing on 25.11.2022
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 25.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed deliberately by Supreme Court of India with ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 25.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional filed Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed by Supreme Court of India with an ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 07.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional filed Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed by Supreme Court of India with ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
E-Filed Petition dated 07.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Supreme Court ...Om Prakash Poddar
All Annexes, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Petitioner has e-filed 10 legal documents on 7.6.2022 and 84 Additional legal documents till 22.11.2022 in Provisional Application no. 12939-2022 and Writ Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 before Supreme Court of India which has not been taken into record of office report dated 24.09.2022 and has not been entered into Writ Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 at the website in the public domain. Hence, crucial records have been suppressed deliberately with ulterior motive.
Complaint dated 21.11.2022 against Bihar and Delhi police to NHRC.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
#Internationalsexracket
National Human Rights Commission New Delhi, take action against kidnapping, abduction and Gang Rape of my families and minor daughters.
E-filed status dated 15.11.22 before Supreme Court of India.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
E-filed Important legal documents like Interlocutory Applications for additional grounds and cancellation of Non Bailable Warrant has not been entered into Physical filing case record Writ Petition Criminal Diary No. 18546/2022 to present the wrong fact before the Chamber Judge on 25.11.2022
Complaint aginst Delhi Police to NHRC New Delhi dated 20.11.22.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
ABDUCTION/RAPE by Police
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Hence, register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
ABDUCTION/RAPE by Police case.
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters. Hence, register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
Register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
Writ Petition Criminal Diary Number 18546 of 2022 Part-I .pdfOm Prakash Poddar
International Sex Racket and Anti-Prostitution Petition before Supreme Court of India.
These five are key people and will reveal all records in this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Register F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court New Delhi.
Writ Petition Criminal Diary Number 18546 of 2022 Part-I .pdf
Second Appeal against Patna High Court_03_11_2016
1. Second Appeal
1
FILING INDEX
IN THE CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE, NEW DELHI
IN THE MATTER OF:
OM PRAKASH ……PETITIONER
VERSUS
PATNA HIGH COURT …… RESPONDENT
S.N Particulars Pages
1. Second Appeal dated 03.11.2016 01-11
2. Letter of Registrar
Administration Patna High Court
to District and Session Judge
Civil Court Begusarai dated
30.09.2016
12
3. First Appeal dated 02.09.2016 13-22
2. Second Appeal
2
4. RTI reply by CJM cum PIO Civil
Court Begusarai dated
27.08.2016
23-29
5. RTI request dated 27.05.2016 30-38
6. Letter of Department of Justice
to the Registrar General &
CPIO, Patna High Court dated
05.07.2016
39
7. Letter of Joint Registrar
Judicial Patna High Court to
the CJM cum PIO Civil Court
Begusarai dated 04.08.2016
40
8. Certified Copies of Application
for cancellation of N.B.W dated
25.08.2010 and replication
against case no. 9P of 2010
along with affidavit and
Vakalatnama filed before CJM
division Begusarai dated
41-52
3. Second Appeal
3
03.03.2011.
9. Certified Copies of Order sheet
of CJM division Begusarai w.e.f
31.03.2010 to 02.05.2011.
53-60
Petitioner in Person
Filed on: 03.11.2016 Om Prakash
Diary No. 183722
4. Second Appeal
4
Date: 03/11/2016
Ref: RTI reply No. 438 dated 27.08.2016 by C.J.M Cum-
PIO with attachment of report by concerned courts
under Ld. C.J.M Division Begusarai in case no.
5591/2013 under letter no.115 dated 22.08.2016 and in
case no. 9P/2010 under letter no. 14 dated
23.08.2016.
From:
Om Prakash Poddar
R/O RZF-893, Netaji Subhas Marg
Raj Nagar Part-2, Palam Colony,
New Delhi-10077
Mob: 9968337815
E-mail: om.poddar@gmail.com
To,
The Second Appellate Authority,
The Chief Information Commissioner
Room No. 305, B-Wing,
August Kranti Bhawan
Bhikaji Cama Place
New Delhi-110066
Sub: Second Appeal U/S 19 (1) of RTI Act 2005
Hon’ble Sir,
I regret that District and Sessions Judge-cum
Appellate Authority, Civil Courts, Begusarai, Bihar
under the judicature of Patna High Court did not
5. Second Appeal
5
reply back the first appeal of the applicant within
the stipulated time of 30 days.
Moreover, Chief Judicial Magistrate Cum Public
Information Officer District Court Begusarai Bihar
has furnished false and frivolous RTI reply on
27.08.2016.
Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate Cum Public Information
Officer District Court Begusarai Bihar under QUESTION
NO.07 in Case No. 9P of 2010 u/s 12 of domestic
violence Act, "the application for cancellation of
N.B.W 25.08.2010 was never pressed before court, so
no order was passed upon it and neither the
petitioner nor his advocate had appeared before the
court" has been falsified by the record of certified
copy of Order dated 4.4.2011 issued by Begusarai
Civil Court itself and the same copy has been
submitted at Ld. Trail Court at New Delhi in Case
No. HMA-700 of 2010 and on the ground of which
Hon’ble High Court of Delhi has pronounced the
Judgement in Case No. MAT. APPL. 7 of 2012 on
23.07.2013 in favor of the applicant.
Under these circumstances, either you can give it or
else you can order him or her to supply the same.
The data is important because applicant has to place
on record it in the Review Petition Criminal against
the malfunctioning of State Apparatus which has
arisen out of dismissal of Writ Criminal 136 of 2016
by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on 21.10.2016.
As another N.B.W dated 08.09.2011 process u/s 83
Cr.Pc. has been issued by the same CJM division
against applicant and his Senior Citizen ailing
mother in another frivolous criminal case no. 5591 of
2013 u/s 498A after the closure of case no. 9P of
2010 and kept it secret since then without the
6. Second Appeal
6
knowledge of applicant to usurp his property in
Bihar.
Hence, I request you Hon’ble sir, to pass an order to
supply the following Information satisfactorily, or
supply the same as per the rules under RTI Act-2005.
My point wise averments and arguments are as under:
Requested Information: 1.) Why notice of appearance
not being served on the accused within two weeks from
the date of institutions of case on 07.02.2011??
Supplied Information: 1.) The Complaint case no. 397C
of 2011 CIS Reg. no.5591 of 2013 has been filed on
07.03.2011 in the Court of Ld. C.J.M, Begusarai and
the case record vide order dated 07.03.3011 vide
which the case record was make over in the Court of
the then S.D.J.M Begusarai for inquiry and disposal.
Next date of hearing was fixed as 17.03.2011;
08.04.2011; 16.04.2011 and so on. All the proceedings
were conducted in this case as per provisions of law.
From perusal of the order sheet, it appears that the
information sought in this paragraph is not available
on the order sheet or on the case record.
Argument and reasons for full information:
As per the RTI application dated 28.05.2016, the
applicant has sought as to why notice is not being
served to the accused within two weeks of institution
of case till date and information has been supplied
the next date of hearing on so and so date as per the
perusal of order sheet. However, the applicant is not
in receipt of NOTICE for appearance till date. It has
not been clarified whether notice has been received
back as per the perusal of the order sheet or not.
7. Second Appeal
7
The information supplied is misleading and besides
the information sought. Hence, true information to
be supplied.
Requested Information: 2.) Why Magistrate did not
order of arrest of the accused since 5 years from the
institutions of case on 07.02.2011 to till date?
Supplied Information: 2.) The order for issuance of
NBW was passed on 08.09.2011 by the then Court and
the accused Om Prakash Poddar & Asha Devi have not
appeared till date. Process u/s 83 Cr.P.C. has been
issued;
Argument and reasons for full information: Here also
the furnished information is besides the information
sought. Applicant is seeking information about arrest
of the accused and information is supplied for the
issuance of NBW on the order sheet with Process u/s
83 Cr.P.C.
Hence, the information supplied is incomplete and
false. Hence, true information to be furnished in
line with the sought information.
Requested Information: 3.) Why accused not being
charge-sheeted since 5 years from the institution of
case on 07.02.2011 to till date?
Supplied Information: 3.) The case record is for
appearance of the accused persons and the accused Om
Prakash Poddar & Asha Devi have not appeared till
date.
Argument and reasons for full information: No
argument hence no comment.
8. Second Appeal
8
Requested Information: 4.) Why did the first hearing
has been fixed on 05.12.2013 after Two and half years
of institution of the case on 07.02.2011?
Supplied Information: 4.) The Complaint case no.
397C of 2011 CIS Reg. 5591 of 2013 has been filed on
07.03.2011 in the Court of Ld. C.J.M Begusarai and
the case record was make over in the Court of the
then S.D.J.M Begusarai for inquiry and disposal. Next
date of hearing was fixed as 17.03.2011; 08.04.2011;
16.04.2011 and so on.
Argument and reasons for full information: As it has
been admitted fact by the Ld. PIO in the para no.01
of supplied information, “From perusal of the order
sheet, it appears that the information sought in this
paragraph is not available on the order sheet or on
the case record.” Hence, order sheet of e-Court
services supplied by the Ld. System Officer Ld.
District Court Begusarai on 01.03.2016 does not
contain this information.
Requested Information: 5.) Why Ld. district Court
Begusarai supplied the information against case no.
5591 of 2013 while the information was sought by the
petitioner against the case no. 9P/2010?
Supplied Information: 5.) From the available Case
Records of 9P/2010 the answers of this query cannot
be obtained. Moreover the question is not clear and
there is no material which shows which information
was sought and what was given, particularly by which
court and in which year.
Argument and reasons for full information: As the Ld.
PIO has directly refused to answer the question in
9. Second Appeal
9
the garb of lack of material evidence; hence you are
requested to supply this information on the ground of
the First Appeal dated 09.08.2016 wherein the
attachment of material evidence has been filed before
you. However, this material was supplied by the Ld.
System Officer, Ld. District Court Begusarai through
email dated 01.03.2016 under the intimation of
cpc-pat@aij.gov.in and ecommittee@aij.gov.in.
Requested Information: 6.) What is the Correlation
between case no. 9P of 2010 and case no. 5591 of
2013?
Supplied Information: 6.) The case no. 9P of 2010 is
not pending in this Court. No materials available,
which shows correlation between two cases.
Argument and reasons for full information: As the Ld.
PIO has admitted this fact and shown his inability to
answer this question; hence you are requested to
supply this information on the ground of the First
Appeal dated 09.08.2016 with attachment of materials
has been filed before you. However, this material was
supplied by the Ld. System Officer, Ld. District
Court Begusarai through email dated 01.03.2016 under
the intimation of cpc-pat@aij.gov.in and
ecommittee@aij.gov.in. The content of this email
needs to be read as part of the material evidence on
the ground of which this information has been sought
by the applicant.
Requested Information: 7.) Why Magistrate did not
take the cognizance of replication and cancellation
of NBW filed by the petitioner against the case no.9P
of 2010 through his advocate on 03.03.2011 where it
10. Second Appeal
10
has been clearly mentioned that the complainant has
appeared before the Ld. Trial Court in case no. HMA
700 of 2010 at New Delhi and has intentionally
concealed this material fact from this Court?
Supplied Information: 7.) From the perusal of order
sheets of Case no. 9P/2010, it appears that the
application for cancellation of NBW was never pressed
before court, so no order was passed upon it and
neither the petitioner nor his advocate had appeared
before the court (Clear from order dated 02/5/2011).
Argument and reasons for full information: As the Ld.
PIO has supplied absolutely false and frivolous
information because the Ld. Trial Court at New Delhi
and Hon’ble High Court of Delhi has pronounced the
Judgment in MAT. APPL. 7/2012 on 23.07.2013 on the
ground of certified copy of the Ld. Begusarai Court
vide case no.9P of 2010. It is also evident from
recalling the order dated 04.04.2011 in case no. 9P
of 2010; Vakalatnama filed by on behalf of Advocate
Mr. Arun Kumar Singh vide Reg. No. 6255/95;
application for cancellation of NBW and replication
with Affidavit at Ld. C.J.M Court Begusarai at
12.30PM duly signed by the deponent and verified by
his Advocate with signature of the deponent taken on
the register available at Ld. C.J.M Court on
03.03.2011 against case no. 9P of 2010. Applicant is
enclosing herewith the scanned copy of certified
copies of the same and Vakalatnama of his Advocate
for your perusal. Hence, an offence of perjury has
been committed by the Ld. PIO which naturally becomes
the ground for filing Writ Criminal Petition titled
“Om Prakash Vs State of Bihar & Ors” before the
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Hence, the
11. Second Appeal
11
information supplied is misleading, false and
frivolous. Hence, true information to be given in
line with the information sought.
Requested Information: 8.) Why Magistrate did not
order or direct the complainant to pursue the HMA-700
of 2010 where she has already appeared on 09.02.2011
at New Delhi because the jurisdiction of case falls
within South West district of Delhi?
Supplied Information: 8.) The information sought by
this question is vague as it is not clear that
regarding Order of which case, it refers.
Argument and reasons for full information: As the Ld.
PIO has directly refused to supply the information in
the garb of unavailability of records. However, the
records are available at the Ld. Trial Court in case
no. HMA-700 of 2010 at New Delhi. The original
certified copy of it is also available with
applicant. The applicant is enclosing herewith a copy
of order sheet to recall the order dated 04.04.2011
in case no. 9P of 2010; filing Index; Memo of
Parties; Vakalatnama filed by on behalf of Advocate
Mr. Arun Kumar Singh vide Reg. No. 6255/95;
application for cancellation of NBW and replication
with Affidavit at Ld. C.J.M Court Begusarai at
12.30PM duly signed by the deponent and verified by
his Advocate with signature of the deponent taken on
the register available at Ld. C.J.M Court on
03.03.2011 against case no. 9P of 2010. Applicant is
enclosing herewith a copy of certified copies of the
same and Vakalatnama of his Advocate for your
perusal. Hence, an offence of perjury has been
committed by the Ld. PIO which naturally becomes the
12. Second Appeal
12
ground for filing Writ Criminal titled “Om Prakash Vs
State of Bihar & Ors” before the Hon’ble Supreme
Court of India. Hence, the information supplied is
misleading, false and frivolous. Hence, true
information to be given in line with the information
sought.
Requested Information: 9.) Why no FIR, no written
statement (WS) by the client of women protection
officer before the Ld. Trial Court at New Delhi, no
appearance by the client of women protection officer
before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi yet frivolous
criminal cases are continuing for the same cause of
action in another state even after the settlement by
the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in case no. MAT. APPL
7 of 2012 on 23.07.2013?
Supplied Information: 9.) The information sought by
this question is vague as it is not clear that
regarding which case of this Court, it refers.
Argument and reasons for full information: As the Ld.
PIO has directly refused to supply the information in
the garb of vague question. However, the brief
background of RTI application on the ground of which,
this question being framed by the applicant, has been
totally overlooked by the Ld. PIO. However, all the
case numbers given in the background of RTI
application are available on the record of Indian e-
Court’s website. Moreover, this question is directly
related with case no. 9P of 2010 wherein the
application for cancellation of NBW, Affidavit in
support, reply of complaint No. 9P of 2010 u/s 43(12)
of protection of women from domestic violence Act,
13. Second Appeal
13
2005 for setting aside order under section 18, 19,
20, 21 and 22, Affidavit in support, list of
documents, residence proof of applicant/respondent,
order sheet of the Divorce Petition HMA No. 700 of
2010 proceedings at Ld. Family Court, Ld. Dwarka
Court, copy of divorce Petition HMA No. 700 of 2010
u/s 13 (1)(i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1956(as
amended up-to-date) for dissolution of marriage by
decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty, medical
prescription of Applicant/Respondent (Asha Devi),
Vakalatnama with total numbers of 50 pages have been
filed on 03.03.2011 before the Ld. Court of Ld. 1st
Class Judicial Magistrate, Ld. Shri Atul Kumar
Pathak, Ld. District Court Begusarai, Bihar. Hence,
the information supplied is misleading, false and
frivolous. Hence, true information to be given in
line with the information sought.
DRAWN & FILED BY:
PETITIONER IN PERSON
OM PRAKASH
NEW DELHI:
FILED ON : 03.11.2016
Enclosure:
1.Letter of Registrar Administration Patna High
Court to District and Session Judge Civil Court
Begusarai dated 30.09.2016 (page from 12 to 12)
14. Second Appeal
14
2.First Appeal dated 02.09.2016(page from 13 to
22)
3.RTI reply by CJM cum PIO Civil Court Begusarai
dated 27.08.2016(page from 23 to 29)
4.RTI request dated 27.05.2016(page from 30 to
38)
5.Letter of Department of Justice to the
Registrar General & CPIO, Patna High Court
dated 05.07.2016(page from 39 to 39)
6.Letter of Joint Registrar Judicial Patna High
Court to the CJM cum PIO Civil Court Begusarai
dated 04.08.2016(page from 40 to 40)
7.Certified Copies of Application for
cancellation of N.B.W dated 25.08.2010 and
replication against case no. 9P of 2010 along
with affidavit and Vakalatnama filed before CJM
division Begusarai dated 03.03.2011. (page from
41 to 52)
8.Certified Copies of Order sheet of CJM division
Begusarai w.e.f 31.03.2010 to 02.05.2011. (page
from 53 to 60)