Mountain Language by
Harold Pinter
HALEH ESMAILIAN
JAN. 2016
 Opened officially at London National Theatre, in Oct. 20th,1988
 Shocked with its stark look at Totalitarianism
 Evoked contrasting comments and reactions
 Shared his previous plays’ characteristics in structure and style
 Focused on a new subject matter
 Inspired by long history of oppression the Kurds suffered from, under the
Turkish rule
 The play is centered in a prison in controlled by unnamed guards in an unnamed
country, holding prisoner some people for unnamed crimes against the unnamed
state
 The prisoners and their visitors’ own language is banned by prison officials, not
allowed to be spoken, like what the Turkish government did to the Kurds
 Blending Absurdism and Realism, Pinter illustrates :
a. Harsh reality of modern society
b. Individual’s powerless state and isolation within that society
Tish Dace, in her article, in Reference Guide to English Literature, asserts that
the play’s richness with its inscrutable motivations has made his name enter the critical
lexicon to deal with these derivative Dramas, now termed as
“ Pinteresque”
 Born on Oct. 30, 1930 in Hackney, East London he was the only child of a working
class family
 Had a relatively happy childhood until the second world war initiated Terror in him
during Germany’s air attacks on London
 Encountered problems growing up due to his Jewish heritage, like continuous
Menace by Gangs
 Role played for Macbeth and Romeo and Juliet in Grammar
school
 Printed in Hackneys’ Downs school magazine, Essays on James
Joyce and two poems, indicating the beginning of his distinctive
style and talent
 In 1948 went on Acting in Royal Academy of Dramatic Art
(RADA)
 Wrote poems, short prose pieces, Acted on stage and TV under the
pseudonym of David Baron
 “ Insight in how successful the plays are constructed and a sharp
ear for dialogues, are among things that the experience in Acting
has earned for me.” , he once said in an interview
 Started writing plays with one titled as The Room a one-act play
for a friend’s student production, that succeeded in the process of
production and inspired him to start a serious career as a
playwright
 Soon after that plays like:
. Birthday Party
. Caretaker
. Mountain Language
Were born, earning with themselves many outstanding Awards for
the playwright
 The awards include:
 Act I : prison wall
 Act II : visitor’s room
 Act III : Voice in the Darkness
 Act IV : visitor’s room
 Charley : the prisoner whose deep affections
with Sara becomes evident during their talks
about being reunited again, romantically
 He collapses in front of her towards the end of
the play, which suggests that he has been
tortured
 Elderly woman: referred to as ‘mountain woman’
she has come to see her son
 Her kind and nurturing nature is revealed when
bringing food to his son
 Or telling him every one is waiting for his return
 She ends the play with
 When at the end of the play her son tells her that
their language is free to be spoken she no more is
able to speak either for losing ability to do so or
her son’s status that shocked her
 The Guard
 Exhibits cruelty when on and on jabs the elderly
woman with a stick
 Tries to justify his acts saying he has got
responsibilities an a family
 But refuses to understand that he also has a
family when the prisoner tells him so
 Instead, in an effort to punish him calls him a
joker in his report to the officer
 Sara Johnson : Charley’s wife
 Not a mountain woman
 Illustrates her compassionate nature trying to
comfort the elderly woman with her bitten hand
 Reveals courage standing up several times to
sergeant and officer
 Tells them it’s their right to see their men
 And is clever enough not to participate in none
sense conversations started by the officer
choosing to be silent at times
 Hooded man (see Charley)
 Officer : in charge of the prison
 At times shows responsibilities and following
reasonable guidelines but changes behavior very
soon dissolving into meaningless conversations
along with that of sergeants for instance about
dog’s name
 He directs sergeant upon asking them for
complaints but never goes on with them
 He admits Sara’s husband being in the ‘wrong
batch’, but never questions his guilt
 Hooded man (see Charley)
 Officer : he asserts authority for absurd rules
that if the dog did not give his name he would be
killed
 Tries to impose control over them, when asking
the women to keep silent while they actually are
silent
 The prisoner :
 He illustrates compassion when showing care
about his mother’s torn hand
 Or when trying to encourage the guard to
remember brotherhood telling him, he also has a
wife and three kids
 Being called a ‘joker’ by the guard and a bloody
face at the end of the play results in his collapse in
front of his mother which is a sign of experiencing
a mental, emotional and physical shock due to
witnessing his mother’s status and hopelessness
 Second guard:
 Appears in the corridor holding Sara’s husband
 Sergeant :
 Exhibits cruelty and desire to power
 Repeatedly categorizes the prisoners as
‘s…houses’
 Tries to demean Sara calling her an
‘f…intellectual’
 Touches her saying ‘intellectual a…s wobble the
best’
 Tells Sara that she ‘bounces with sin’
 Professes that the ‘mountain language’ is
forbidden by him but later on tries to play the
role of a public servant by asserting he is the one
who has engineered the law to let them speak
their ‘mountain language’
 But again reveals his true nature showing no care
when the prisoner collapses in front of him
saying:
“ you get out of your way giving them a helping
hand and they f…k it up.”
 Young woman (see Sara)
Notice:
Themes:
Meaninglessness
Social protest
Censorship
Sexual abuse
Resistance
Meaninglessness: major theme
Meaninglessness is illustrated well through:
Pinter’s adroit construction of the play
Absurd Theatre-> Absurd World
Nothing makes sense in that Absurd world of prison
Prisoners are called ‘s…houses’ and ‘enemies of state’
But crimes are unnamed
The narrative suggests only they’re being arrested for
being ‘mountain people’ whose language is outlawed,
But even when Charley is recognized not to be one of them
and in a ‘wrong batch’, nothing is done to help…
Meaninglessness: major theme
Meaninglessness is illustrated well through:
Pinter has shown the Existentialist vision of condition of
man by-> deconstructing the traditional view of Rational
Human in an Intelligible universe
Characters keep questioning the rules there in search of a
Logical Structure but
They get thwarted on and on ‘cause there is no Logic in a
system with NO Truth or Value
Meaninglessness: major theme
Breakdown between Language & meaning->
meaninglessness
Sara’s dialogues in order to convince them to treat the
woman’s hand or get their rights or be allowed to reunite
with their men-> Pointless Babble
Social protest:
Through characterization & dramatic structure he
presents :
Censorship:
Stripping characters of Cultural Identity
Calling their Language ‘Dead’
Dragging characters to the point of denial of sense
of self
Isolating each of them from the other by:
Sexual Abuse:
Even after realizing Sara is from a different social class,
not a ‘mountain woman’ to be controlled by them,
This system has no intention of letting go & finds another
way to exercise power over her mainly through: using
language as a tool
~ identifying her as ‘f…intellectual’
~ putting hands on her asking, ‘what language do
you speak with you’re a…s?’
~ undermining her status in prison hierarchy
announcing her being full of sin so that she
‘bounces’ with it
RESISTANCE:
 SARA Tries to resist the officials’ authority by:
• Questions & Silences
• Insisting it’s her right to see Charley
• Persuading them to treat elderly woman’s hand
• Facing their repeated foolish questions about dog’s name she
keeps silent to avoid participating in meaningless dialogues
Style - structure:
 Structure  fragmented  sense of isolation
& alienation
 Like in Act I that centers on women, Sara
attempts to engage with officials but
reinforced with sense of alienation as does the
fact that the scene ends before she or others
reunite with their men
Style - structure:
 Structure  fragmented  sense of isolation
& alienation
 Like in Act II that centers on elderly woman
& her son we see broken communication
between them which is reinforced in Act IV,
where she is unable to regain her broken
identity and can’t respond to her son who has
also lost by then his self-identity sense and
collapses
Style - structure:
 Structure  fragmented  sense of isolation
& alienation
 Like in Act III the claustrophobic atmosphere
of entire scene suggests that neither Sara nor
her husband are not going to experience
reuniting and can’t escape this fragmentation
neither individually nor as a whole
Style - Language:
 Language  unique use of language or Lack
of it
 Most dialogues seem to make a little or no
sense
 Communication breakdowns shows absurdity
of their position
Historical context:
 Theatre of the Absurd:
• Portrays specific vision of human condition
• Rejects human rationality living in intelligible universe
with logical structure
• Shows striving characters who finally fail to find
purpose and meaning in a world with no truth or value
• Lacks conventional structure
• Incorporate silence and miscommunication suggests
Isolation & alienation
• Loose plot hardly strung together as a series of
fragmented scenes and disconnected images reflecting
characters’ condition in life
Historical context:
 Repression of the Kurds:
• A minority of twenty five to thirty million
people in a long conflict with Turkish
government, heightened at the end of WWI,
with Treaty of Versailles which gave the
governments the right to rule over them
• Tension rises in 1937, when Ata Turk decreed
religious and non Turkish cultural expressions
to be outlawed including the word ‘Kurd’
Historical context:
 Repression of the Kurds:
• A decade later schools, publications and
organizations were banned
• Reference to Kurdish regions were excluded
from the maps
• After the word ‘Kurd’ was outlawed, they were
called ‘mountain Turks’ who had forgotten
their language
• Positions & landscapes & properties were also
confiscated by the government
Historical context:
 Repression of the Kurds:
• Launched revolts appealing to cultural practices
• Kurdish Leader fails to gather supports of all tribes
• 1925, revolts are suppressed
• 1930, harsher & more repressive measures are
handed out
• Results in being impoverished, culturally
oppressed minority in Turkey
Historical context:
 Repression of the Kurds:
• In 1996 London Police arrests a group of 11
Kurd rehearsing Mountain Language, with
plastic guns, taking hours to investigate the
truth.
• This event was interpreted by Pinter as:
Critical overview:
 Opening at National Theatre of London, in
October 20th,1988 the play faced many
controversial reviews:
• Some praised it for compelling subject matter
• Some found it “too political”
In an overview of Pinter and his works in
Contemporary Dramatists, Lois Gordon applauds
plays’ ‘frightening images of Totalitarianism’
Critical overview:
 Douglas Kennedy in his review of the play in
New States Men & Society:
“ the play is a highly condensed guided tour
through state Tyranny represented through series
of stark, rather atypical image of political
repression.”
He calls the play ‘ terribly predictable in its vision
of state terror, therefor uncomfortably hollow’.
Spencer in his review of the Daily Telegraph:
‘sketchy’
‘paranoid’
‘self-righteous’
“ characters are types, not people, which shows that audience
reaction is of huge concern rather than specific sympathy.”
“ He attempts to make parallel worlds between play’s
Totalitarianism and current government in Britain and his
suggestion that Britain is indistinguishable from oppressive
regimes is shrill and impertinent.”
Wendy Perkins
Associate Prof. of English
At Prince Georges College
“ an effective
mix of Realism & the
Absurd “
“ Pinter’s works combine ‘Realism’ with elements of ‘the Absurd’ in effort to show
The reality of Totalitarianism and the Meaninglessness of its Core.”
“ The Result of this Combination then, would be: Compelling and Shocking
Portrait of POLITICAL TERRORISM.”
Ronald Knowles
In his Essay
Discusses Pinter’s famous ‘Name & language’
technique
“ it’s assumed that the
play is a barely veiled
Critique of Turkey’s
suppression of Kurds.”
“ Pinter’s work however can be seen LTERALLY and METAPHORICALLY.”
From a literal P.O.V audience is likely to make connection with Plight of Kurds.
“ But Metaphorically it reminds of Brian Friel’s play of 1980, Translations, making the
British audience recall the English Encroachment on Irish Language in 19th century.
The play was well attended in Wales, where it’s not forgotten that England tried to
prohibit the speaking of Welsh in the last century.”
Ronald Knowles
In his Essay
Discusses Pinter’s famous ‘Name & language’
technique
“ But through the performance of Mountain Language, Pinter as the
director has created a particular feeling of uneasiness in the audience,
by creating and exploiting a specific condition in their RECEPTION. A
reception that has been familiar through British TV, with soldiers
dressed up with regular battle fatigues;
A reception exploited also by seeing the ‘foul-mouthed’ Sergeant who
spoke with a strong London accent, on Pinter’s directed scenes.”

Mountain language by harold pinter

  • 1.
    Mountain Language by HaroldPinter HALEH ESMAILIAN JAN. 2016
  • 2.
     Opened officiallyat London National Theatre, in Oct. 20th,1988  Shocked with its stark look at Totalitarianism  Evoked contrasting comments and reactions  Shared his previous plays’ characteristics in structure and style  Focused on a new subject matter  Inspired by long history of oppression the Kurds suffered from, under the Turkish rule
  • 3.
     The playis centered in a prison in controlled by unnamed guards in an unnamed country, holding prisoner some people for unnamed crimes against the unnamed state  The prisoners and their visitors’ own language is banned by prison officials, not allowed to be spoken, like what the Turkish government did to the Kurds  Blending Absurdism and Realism, Pinter illustrates : a. Harsh reality of modern society b. Individual’s powerless state and isolation within that society Tish Dace, in her article, in Reference Guide to English Literature, asserts that the play’s richness with its inscrutable motivations has made his name enter the critical lexicon to deal with these derivative Dramas, now termed as “ Pinteresque”
  • 4.
     Born onOct. 30, 1930 in Hackney, East London he was the only child of a working class family  Had a relatively happy childhood until the second world war initiated Terror in him during Germany’s air attacks on London  Encountered problems growing up due to his Jewish heritage, like continuous Menace by Gangs
  • 5.
     Role playedfor Macbeth and Romeo and Juliet in Grammar school  Printed in Hackneys’ Downs school magazine, Essays on James Joyce and two poems, indicating the beginning of his distinctive style and talent  In 1948 went on Acting in Royal Academy of Dramatic Art (RADA)  Wrote poems, short prose pieces, Acted on stage and TV under the pseudonym of David Baron  “ Insight in how successful the plays are constructed and a sharp ear for dialogues, are among things that the experience in Acting has earned for me.” , he once said in an interview
  • 6.
     Started writingplays with one titled as The Room a one-act play for a friend’s student production, that succeeded in the process of production and inspired him to start a serious career as a playwright  Soon after that plays like: . Birthday Party . Caretaker . Mountain Language Were born, earning with themselves many outstanding Awards for the playwright
  • 7.
  • 8.
     Act I: prison wall  Act II : visitor’s room  Act III : Voice in the Darkness  Act IV : visitor’s room
  • 9.
     Charley :the prisoner whose deep affections with Sara becomes evident during their talks about being reunited again, romantically  He collapses in front of her towards the end of the play, which suggests that he has been tortured
  • 10.
     Elderly woman:referred to as ‘mountain woman’ she has come to see her son  Her kind and nurturing nature is revealed when bringing food to his son  Or telling him every one is waiting for his return  She ends the play with  When at the end of the play her son tells her that their language is free to be spoken she no more is able to speak either for losing ability to do so or her son’s status that shocked her
  • 11.
     The Guard Exhibits cruelty when on and on jabs the elderly woman with a stick  Tries to justify his acts saying he has got responsibilities an a family  But refuses to understand that he also has a family when the prisoner tells him so  Instead, in an effort to punish him calls him a joker in his report to the officer
  • 12.
     Sara Johnson: Charley’s wife  Not a mountain woman  Illustrates her compassionate nature trying to comfort the elderly woman with her bitten hand  Reveals courage standing up several times to sergeant and officer  Tells them it’s their right to see their men  And is clever enough not to participate in none sense conversations started by the officer choosing to be silent at times
  • 13.
     Hooded man(see Charley)  Officer : in charge of the prison  At times shows responsibilities and following reasonable guidelines but changes behavior very soon dissolving into meaningless conversations along with that of sergeants for instance about dog’s name  He directs sergeant upon asking them for complaints but never goes on with them  He admits Sara’s husband being in the ‘wrong batch’, but never questions his guilt
  • 14.
     Hooded man(see Charley)  Officer : he asserts authority for absurd rules that if the dog did not give his name he would be killed  Tries to impose control over them, when asking the women to keep silent while they actually are silent
  • 15.
     The prisoner:  He illustrates compassion when showing care about his mother’s torn hand  Or when trying to encourage the guard to remember brotherhood telling him, he also has a wife and three kids  Being called a ‘joker’ by the guard and a bloody face at the end of the play results in his collapse in front of his mother which is a sign of experiencing a mental, emotional and physical shock due to witnessing his mother’s status and hopelessness
  • 16.
     Second guard: Appears in the corridor holding Sara’s husband  Sergeant :  Exhibits cruelty and desire to power  Repeatedly categorizes the prisoners as ‘s…houses’  Tries to demean Sara calling her an ‘f…intellectual’  Touches her saying ‘intellectual a…s wobble the best’
  • 17.
     Tells Sarathat she ‘bounces with sin’  Professes that the ‘mountain language’ is forbidden by him but later on tries to play the role of a public servant by asserting he is the one who has engineered the law to let them speak their ‘mountain language’  But again reveals his true nature showing no care when the prisoner collapses in front of him saying: “ you get out of your way giving them a helping hand and they f…k it up.”
  • 18.
     Young woman(see Sara) Notice:
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Meaninglessness: major theme Meaninglessnessis illustrated well through: Pinter’s adroit construction of the play Absurd Theatre-> Absurd World Nothing makes sense in that Absurd world of prison Prisoners are called ‘s…houses’ and ‘enemies of state’ But crimes are unnamed The narrative suggests only they’re being arrested for being ‘mountain people’ whose language is outlawed, But even when Charley is recognized not to be one of them and in a ‘wrong batch’, nothing is done to help…
  • 21.
    Meaninglessness: major theme Meaninglessnessis illustrated well through: Pinter has shown the Existentialist vision of condition of man by-> deconstructing the traditional view of Rational Human in an Intelligible universe Characters keep questioning the rules there in search of a Logical Structure but They get thwarted on and on ‘cause there is no Logic in a system with NO Truth or Value
  • 22.
    Meaninglessness: major theme Breakdownbetween Language & meaning-> meaninglessness Sara’s dialogues in order to convince them to treat the woman’s hand or get their rights or be allowed to reunite with their men-> Pointless Babble
  • 23.
    Social protest: Through characterization& dramatic structure he presents :
  • 24.
    Censorship: Stripping characters ofCultural Identity Calling their Language ‘Dead’ Dragging characters to the point of denial of sense of self Isolating each of them from the other by:
  • 25.
    Sexual Abuse: Even afterrealizing Sara is from a different social class, not a ‘mountain woman’ to be controlled by them, This system has no intention of letting go & finds another way to exercise power over her mainly through: using language as a tool ~ identifying her as ‘f…intellectual’ ~ putting hands on her asking, ‘what language do you speak with you’re a…s?’ ~ undermining her status in prison hierarchy announcing her being full of sin so that she ‘bounces’ with it
  • 26.
    RESISTANCE:  SARA Triesto resist the officials’ authority by: • Questions & Silences • Insisting it’s her right to see Charley • Persuading them to treat elderly woman’s hand • Facing their repeated foolish questions about dog’s name she keeps silent to avoid participating in meaningless dialogues
  • 27.
    Style - structure: Structure  fragmented  sense of isolation & alienation  Like in Act I that centers on women, Sara attempts to engage with officials but reinforced with sense of alienation as does the fact that the scene ends before she or others reunite with their men
  • 28.
    Style - structure: Structure  fragmented  sense of isolation & alienation  Like in Act II that centers on elderly woman & her son we see broken communication between them which is reinforced in Act IV, where she is unable to regain her broken identity and can’t respond to her son who has also lost by then his self-identity sense and collapses
  • 29.
    Style - structure: Structure  fragmented  sense of isolation & alienation  Like in Act III the claustrophobic atmosphere of entire scene suggests that neither Sara nor her husband are not going to experience reuniting and can’t escape this fragmentation neither individually nor as a whole
  • 30.
    Style - Language: Language  unique use of language or Lack of it  Most dialogues seem to make a little or no sense  Communication breakdowns shows absurdity of their position
  • 31.
    Historical context:  Theatreof the Absurd: • Portrays specific vision of human condition • Rejects human rationality living in intelligible universe with logical structure • Shows striving characters who finally fail to find purpose and meaning in a world with no truth or value • Lacks conventional structure • Incorporate silence and miscommunication suggests Isolation & alienation • Loose plot hardly strung together as a series of fragmented scenes and disconnected images reflecting characters’ condition in life
  • 32.
    Historical context:  Repressionof the Kurds: • A minority of twenty five to thirty million people in a long conflict with Turkish government, heightened at the end of WWI, with Treaty of Versailles which gave the governments the right to rule over them • Tension rises in 1937, when Ata Turk decreed religious and non Turkish cultural expressions to be outlawed including the word ‘Kurd’
  • 33.
    Historical context:  Repressionof the Kurds: • A decade later schools, publications and organizations were banned • Reference to Kurdish regions were excluded from the maps • After the word ‘Kurd’ was outlawed, they were called ‘mountain Turks’ who had forgotten their language • Positions & landscapes & properties were also confiscated by the government
  • 34.
    Historical context:  Repressionof the Kurds: • Launched revolts appealing to cultural practices • Kurdish Leader fails to gather supports of all tribes • 1925, revolts are suppressed • 1930, harsher & more repressive measures are handed out • Results in being impoverished, culturally oppressed minority in Turkey
  • 35.
    Historical context:  Repressionof the Kurds: • In 1996 London Police arrests a group of 11 Kurd rehearsing Mountain Language, with plastic guns, taking hours to investigate the truth. • This event was interpreted by Pinter as:
  • 36.
    Critical overview:  Openingat National Theatre of London, in October 20th,1988 the play faced many controversial reviews: • Some praised it for compelling subject matter • Some found it “too political” In an overview of Pinter and his works in Contemporary Dramatists, Lois Gordon applauds plays’ ‘frightening images of Totalitarianism’
  • 37.
    Critical overview:  DouglasKennedy in his review of the play in New States Men & Society: “ the play is a highly condensed guided tour through state Tyranny represented through series of stark, rather atypical image of political repression.” He calls the play ‘ terribly predictable in its vision of state terror, therefor uncomfortably hollow’.
  • 38.
    Spencer in hisreview of the Daily Telegraph: ‘sketchy’ ‘paranoid’ ‘self-righteous’ “ characters are types, not people, which shows that audience reaction is of huge concern rather than specific sympathy.” “ He attempts to make parallel worlds between play’s Totalitarianism and current government in Britain and his suggestion that Britain is indistinguishable from oppressive regimes is shrill and impertinent.”
  • 39.
    Wendy Perkins Associate Prof.of English At Prince Georges College “ an effective mix of Realism & the Absurd “ “ Pinter’s works combine ‘Realism’ with elements of ‘the Absurd’ in effort to show The reality of Totalitarianism and the Meaninglessness of its Core.” “ The Result of this Combination then, would be: Compelling and Shocking Portrait of POLITICAL TERRORISM.”
  • 40.
    Ronald Knowles In hisEssay Discusses Pinter’s famous ‘Name & language’ technique “ it’s assumed that the play is a barely veiled Critique of Turkey’s suppression of Kurds.” “ Pinter’s work however can be seen LTERALLY and METAPHORICALLY.” From a literal P.O.V audience is likely to make connection with Plight of Kurds. “ But Metaphorically it reminds of Brian Friel’s play of 1980, Translations, making the British audience recall the English Encroachment on Irish Language in 19th century. The play was well attended in Wales, where it’s not forgotten that England tried to prohibit the speaking of Welsh in the last century.”
  • 41.
    Ronald Knowles In hisEssay Discusses Pinter’s famous ‘Name & language’ technique “ But through the performance of Mountain Language, Pinter as the director has created a particular feeling of uneasiness in the audience, by creating and exploiting a specific condition in their RECEPTION. A reception that has been familiar through British TV, with soldiers dressed up with regular battle fatigues; A reception exploited also by seeing the ‘foul-mouthed’ Sergeant who spoke with a strong London accent, on Pinter’s directed scenes.”