This document outlines the key differences between non-critical and critical reading. A non-critical reader accepts a text's statements as facts, while a critical reader recognizes that a text only provides one perspective of the facts. Critical reading involves analyzing an author's purpose, tone, persuasive elements, and biases. It also means questioning what is directly stated and what can be inferred versus what cannot be inferred. The document provides an example statement and discusses what can be inferred from it and what cannot as well as how word choice impacts meaning. It emphasizes that critical reading requires deep analysis of even short texts.