The document provides an overview of a presentation on exploring models of disability and bias. The presentation defines disability, discusses various models of disability including the moral, charity, medical, social, and biopsychosocial models. It also covers prevalence of disability globally and nationally, health disparities faced by those with disabilities, improving health equity, and developing disability competencies for healthcare professionals.
Arthur Marshall research for Public health issue. The WHO (World Health Organization) is the worldwide agency that coordinates and acts on global public health issues.
Florida National UniversityPHI1635 Biomedical Ethics Assignment.docxlmelaine
Florida National University
PHI1635 Biomedical Ethics: Assignment Week 6
Discussion Exercise: Chapter 11
Objective: The students will complete a Virtual Classroom Discussion Exercise that will Extend your knowledge beyond the core required materials for this class, Engage in collaborative learning with other students to improve the quality of the learning experience for all students and Apply the higher cognitive skills associated with critical thinking to your academic and professional work.
ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES (10%):
Students will judgmentally amount the readings from Chapter assign on your textbook. This assignment is prearranged to help you to learning in all disciplines because it helps student’s process information rather than simply receive it.
You need to read the PowerPoint Presentation assigned for week 6 and develop a 2-3 page paper replicating your appreciative and competence to apply the readings to your ethics knowledge. Each paper must be typewritten with 12-point font and double-spaced with standard margins. Follow APA style 7th edition format when referring to the selected articles and include a reference page.
EACH PAPER SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
1. Introduction (25%) Provide a brief synopsis of the meaning (not a description) of each Chapter and articles you read, in your own words that will apply to the case study presented.
2. Discussion Challenge (65%)
Imagine an event of catastrophic proportion involving mass casualties, disrupted or non-existent services (power, transportation, and communications), scarce food and water, limited emergency personnel and medical supplies, overwhelmed hospitals, perhaps contamination from biohazard materials or nuclear fallout, etc.
Now imagine that a new set of rules has been established to guide first responders in the field whenever a “catastrophe” occurs. A system of “response triage” is required, whereby precious and limited resources will be directed to those who could most probably contribute to continued survival and eventual recovery of the community. Those who would require a disproportionate share of resources to live, and those who will most likely not survive the event, are given lower priority for distribution of assistance, including food supplies and medical treatment.
Without any formal discussion of what ethics are and how ethical decisions might be made in the field, we can see that the ethical problems are endless, but are basically summed up by asking:
1. IS EVERY HUMAN LIFE OF THE SAME VALUE AS OTHERS?
· If decision-makers were to set criteria for determining the “fittest” for survival, upon what criteria would those decisions be based?
· The richest and most powerful men?
· Young men and women with the highest sperm and ova counts?
· Mature thinkers who might carry forward lessons that are likely to help humans survive in changing circumstances?
· How would these criteria be measured?
· How would we “value” people who work in health care, education and f ...
Disability in India & Model of DisabilityTalwar Upmesh
This presentation is comprised with Disability in India which comprised with the Model of Disability, causes, Demographic profile of Disabled in India.
Arthur Marshall research for Public health issue. The WHO (World Health Organization) is the worldwide agency that coordinates and acts on global public health issues.
Florida National UniversityPHI1635 Biomedical Ethics Assignment.docxlmelaine
Florida National University
PHI1635 Biomedical Ethics: Assignment Week 6
Discussion Exercise: Chapter 11
Objective: The students will complete a Virtual Classroom Discussion Exercise that will Extend your knowledge beyond the core required materials for this class, Engage in collaborative learning with other students to improve the quality of the learning experience for all students and Apply the higher cognitive skills associated with critical thinking to your academic and professional work.
ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES (10%):
Students will judgmentally amount the readings from Chapter assign on your textbook. This assignment is prearranged to help you to learning in all disciplines because it helps student’s process information rather than simply receive it.
You need to read the PowerPoint Presentation assigned for week 6 and develop a 2-3 page paper replicating your appreciative and competence to apply the readings to your ethics knowledge. Each paper must be typewritten with 12-point font and double-spaced with standard margins. Follow APA style 7th edition format when referring to the selected articles and include a reference page.
EACH PAPER SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
1. Introduction (25%) Provide a brief synopsis of the meaning (not a description) of each Chapter and articles you read, in your own words that will apply to the case study presented.
2. Discussion Challenge (65%)
Imagine an event of catastrophic proportion involving mass casualties, disrupted or non-existent services (power, transportation, and communications), scarce food and water, limited emergency personnel and medical supplies, overwhelmed hospitals, perhaps contamination from biohazard materials or nuclear fallout, etc.
Now imagine that a new set of rules has been established to guide first responders in the field whenever a “catastrophe” occurs. A system of “response triage” is required, whereby precious and limited resources will be directed to those who could most probably contribute to continued survival and eventual recovery of the community. Those who would require a disproportionate share of resources to live, and those who will most likely not survive the event, are given lower priority for distribution of assistance, including food supplies and medical treatment.
Without any formal discussion of what ethics are and how ethical decisions might be made in the field, we can see that the ethical problems are endless, but are basically summed up by asking:
1. IS EVERY HUMAN LIFE OF THE SAME VALUE AS OTHERS?
· If decision-makers were to set criteria for determining the “fittest” for survival, upon what criteria would those decisions be based?
· The richest and most powerful men?
· Young men and women with the highest sperm and ova counts?
· Mature thinkers who might carry forward lessons that are likely to help humans survive in changing circumstances?
· How would these criteria be measured?
· How would we “value” people who work in health care, education and f ...
Disability in India & Model of DisabilityTalwar Upmesh
This presentation is comprised with Disability in India which comprised with the Model of Disability, causes, Demographic profile of Disabled in India.
June 1, 2018
Historically and across societies people with disabilities have been stigmatized and excluded from social opportunities on a variety of culturally specific grounds. These justifications include assertions that people with disabilities are biologically defective, less than capable, costly, suffering, or fundamentally inappropriate for social inclusion. Rethinking the idea of disability so as to detach being disabled from inescapable disadvantage has been considered a key to twenty-first century reconstruction of how disablement is best understood.
Such ‘destigmatizing’ has prompted hot contestation about disability. Bioethicists in the ‘destigmatizing’ camp have lined up to present non-normative accounts, ranging from modest to audacious, that characterize disablement as “mere difference” or in other neutral terms. The arguments for their approach range from applications of standards for epistemic justice to insights provided by evolutionary biology. Conversely, other bioethicists vehemently reject such non-normative or “mere difference” accounts, arguing instead for a “bad difference” stance. “Bad difference” proponents contend that our strongest intuitions make us weigh disability negatively. Furthermore, they warn, destigmatizing disability could be dangerous because social support for medical programs that prevent or cure disability is predicated on disability’s being a condition that it is rational to avoid. Construing disability as normatively neutral thus could undermine the premises for resource support, access priorities, and cultural mores on which the practice of medicine depends.
The “mere difference” vs. “bad difference” debate can have serious implications for legal and policy treatment of disability, and shape strategies for allocating and accessing health care. For example, the framing of disability impacts the implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, and other legal tools designed to address discrimination. The characterization of disability also has health care allocation and accessibility ramifications, such as the treatment of preexisting condition preclusions in health insurance. The aim of this conference was to construct a twenty-first century conception of disablement that resolves the tension about whether being disabled is merely neutral or must be bad, examines and articulates the clinical, philosophical, and practical implications of that determination, and attempts to integrate these conclusions into medical and legal practices.
Learn more: http://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/events/details/2018-petrie-flom-center-annual-conference
Healthy Ageing Initiative HDR workshop-17 Nov 2022.pdfHayleyChow2
This workshop will cover all phases of research, from how to settle on an impactful but feasible project, co-design and respectful partnerships with older people, networking with relevant community organisations, common pitfalls in methodology and data write-up, targeting the right journal and audience for your work, and tips for setting the stage for your next career move in the field.
Living University of Postural Care - Living Local Postural Care Project Evalu...Sarah Clayton
This project was commissioned in the aftermath of Winterbourne View.
This is one of five projects within the ‘Living Local’ Programme and part of the East Midlands Joint Children and Adults Services Efficiency Strategy. This Programme is within both Health and Social Care which is targeted at delivering better and more personalised outcomes for young adults (aged 14-25) and adults with complex health needs to enable them to live closer to home and have better, more fulfilling lives. This evaluation will outline the background to the project, how the work was carried out and the key findings and recommendations of those involved.
The field of health promotion and education is at a turning point as it steps up to address the interconnected challenges of health, equity and sustainable development. Professionals and policy makers recognize the need for an integrative thinking and practice approach to foster comprehensive and coherent action in each of these complex areas.
Building Capacity to Improve Population Health using a Social Determinants of...Practical Playbook
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
The route to success in end of life care - achieving quality for people with learning disabilities
28 February 2011 - National End of Life Care Programme
This publication aims to provide a practical guide which supports anyone caring for people with learning disabilities to ensure that those who may be in the last months of their life receive high quality end of life care.
It may also be useful to health or social care professionals who come into contact with people with learning disabilities in clarifying what measures need to be taken to ensure that they can access appropriate care.
Publication by the National End of Life Programme which became part of NHS Improving Quality in May 2013
Today, you are introduced to the Social Determinant of Health (SDOH) perspective. This assignment responds to two questions, firstly “What is a SDOH perspective?” which will be explored in detail providing two examples of a Social Worker role. The second question requiring a critical discussion surrounding SDOH including “What benefits does a social determinants of health perspective provide, and what are its limits?”.
June 1, 2018
Historically and across societies people with disabilities have been stigmatized and excluded from social opportunities on a variety of culturally specific grounds. These justifications include assertions that people with disabilities are biologically defective, less than capable, costly, suffering, or fundamentally inappropriate for social inclusion. Rethinking the idea of disability so as to detach being disabled from inescapable disadvantage has been considered a key to twenty-first century reconstruction of how disablement is best understood.
Such ‘destigmatizing’ has prompted hot contestation about disability. Bioethicists in the ‘destigmatizing’ camp have lined up to present non-normative accounts, ranging from modest to audacious, that characterize disablement as “mere difference” or in other neutral terms. The arguments for their approach range from applications of standards for epistemic justice to insights provided by evolutionary biology. Conversely, other bioethicists vehemently reject such non-normative or “mere difference” accounts, arguing instead for a “bad difference” stance. “Bad difference” proponents contend that our strongest intuitions make us weigh disability negatively. Furthermore, they warn, destigmatizing disability could be dangerous because social support for medical programs that prevent or cure disability is predicated on disability’s being a condition that it is rational to avoid. Construing disability as normatively neutral thus could undermine the premises for resource support, access priorities, and cultural mores on which the practice of medicine depends.
The “mere difference” vs. “bad difference” debate can have serious implications for legal and policy treatment of disability, and shape strategies for allocating and accessing health care. For example, the framing of disability impacts the implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, and other legal tools designed to address discrimination. The characterization of disability also has health care allocation and accessibility ramifications, such as the treatment of preexisting condition preclusions in health insurance. The aim of this conference was to construct a twenty-first century conception of disablement that resolves the tension about whether being disabled is merely neutral or must be bad, examines and articulates the clinical, philosophical, and practical implications of that determination, and attempts to integrate these conclusions into medical and legal practices.
Learn more: http://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/events/details/2018-petrie-flom-center-annual-conference
Healthy Ageing Initiative HDR workshop-17 Nov 2022.pdfHayleyChow2
This workshop will cover all phases of research, from how to settle on an impactful but feasible project, co-design and respectful partnerships with older people, networking with relevant community organisations, common pitfalls in methodology and data write-up, targeting the right journal and audience for your work, and tips for setting the stage for your next career move in the field.
Living University of Postural Care - Living Local Postural Care Project Evalu...Sarah Clayton
This project was commissioned in the aftermath of Winterbourne View.
This is one of five projects within the ‘Living Local’ Programme and part of the East Midlands Joint Children and Adults Services Efficiency Strategy. This Programme is within both Health and Social Care which is targeted at delivering better and more personalised outcomes for young adults (aged 14-25) and adults with complex health needs to enable them to live closer to home and have better, more fulfilling lives. This evaluation will outline the background to the project, how the work was carried out and the key findings and recommendations of those involved.
The field of health promotion and education is at a turning point as it steps up to address the interconnected challenges of health, equity and sustainable development. Professionals and policy makers recognize the need for an integrative thinking and practice approach to foster comprehensive and coherent action in each of these complex areas.
Building Capacity to Improve Population Health using a Social Determinants of...Practical Playbook
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
The route to success in end of life care - achieving quality for people with learning disabilities
28 February 2011 - National End of Life Care Programme
This publication aims to provide a practical guide which supports anyone caring for people with learning disabilities to ensure that those who may be in the last months of their life receive high quality end of life care.
It may also be useful to health or social care professionals who come into contact with people with learning disabilities in clarifying what measures need to be taken to ensure that they can access appropriate care.
Publication by the National End of Life Programme which became part of NHS Improving Quality in May 2013
Today, you are introduced to the Social Determinant of Health (SDOH) perspective. This assignment responds to two questions, firstly “What is a SDOH perspective?” which will be explored in detail providing two examples of a Social Worker role. The second question requiring a critical discussion surrounding SDOH including “What benefits does a social determinants of health perspective provide, and what are its limits?”.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
2. grc.osu.edu
• Principal Investigator, The Ohio
Colleges of Medicine Government
Resource Center
• Evaluator and subject matter
expert, Ohio Disability and Health
Program
• Adjunct Faculty, The School of
Health and Rehabilitation Sciences
2
Introductions
Cara Whalen Smith, PT, DPT, MPH, CHES
3. grc.osu.edu
Funding Acknowledgement
The Ohio Disability and Health Program is supported by the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention Cooperative Agreement Number
5U59DD000931-03. The contents of this presentation are solely the
responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official
views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
3
5. grc.osu.edu
What is Disability?
• According to the World Health Organization (WHO), a disability is any
cognitive or physical impairment, activity limitation, and/or participation
restriction
• Disability is the interaction between an individual's health condition and
personal and environmental factors
5
WHO (2011); WHO (2001)
14. grc.osu.edu
• Moral Model
– People are morally
responsible for their disability
– Disability is a "curse" or
"punishment" from higher
being
14
Early Models of Disability
15. grc.osu.edu
Examples of the Moral Model
• According to the African Child Policy Forum, common beliefs about
childhood disability include:
– Sin or promiscuity of the mother
– Ancestral curse
– Demonic possession
15
African Child Policy Forum, Violence against Children with Disabilities in Africa: Field Studies from Cameroon, Ethiopia,
Senegal, Uganda and Zambia (2011)
16. grc.osu.edu
• Charity Model
– Encouraged charitable
support towards people with
disabilities
– Did not focus on the rights or
capabilities of people with
disabilities
16
Early Models of Disability
Stella Young TED Talk
Kuper and Myroslava (2018)
20. grc.osu.edu
• Disability is a result of a person’s
physical impairments and seeks
to find a cure for those
impairments even when they do
not cause pain or illness
20
Medical Model of Disability
Kuper and Myroslava (2018)
21. grc.osu.edu
• Disability is a result of the way
society is organized rather than
by a person’s impairment and
seeks to remove barriers that
restrict quality of life
21
Social Model of Disability
Kuper and Myroslava (2018)
23. grc.osu.edu
• “Nothing about us without us” is
the core of this model
• Calls for full inclusion of people
with disabilities as a human right
23
Human Rights Model of Disability
Kuper and Myroslava (2018)
25. grc.osu.edu
Disability Inclusion
• "Inclusion means to transform communities based on social justice principles in which
all community members:
– Are presumed competent
– Are recruited and welcomed as valued members of their community
– Fully participate and learn with their peers
– Experience reciprocal social relationships"
v “Inclusion is not a strategy to help people fit into the systems and structures
which exist in our societies; it is about transforming those systems and structures
to make it better for everyone. Inclusion is about creating a better world for
everyone.” (Diane Richler, past president of Inclusion International)
25
NCHPAD (2020)
27. grc.osu.edu
Disability and Health
• The WHO defines health as “a state of complete physical, mental, and
social well-being, not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” and
makes the distinction between disability and health in the ICF model
27
Image: Kuper and Myroslava (2018); ICF:
WHO (2001)
28. grc.osu.edu
“People with disabilities are not destined to a
life of poor health by virtue of their disability.”
Lack of institutional support and ableism contribute to poor health outcomes
28
Blick et al. (2015)
29. grc.osu.edu
Health Disparities
• In comparison to the general population, PWDs experience worse health
outcomes and overall decreased access to healthcare
• PWDs are more likely to report being in ‘fair’ or ‘poor health’ than the
general population
• There is also a higher risk of disability among people with poor health and
people in poverty
29
Bhaumik et al. (2008); Blauwet and Iezzoni (2014); Burke et al. (2019); Cooper et al.(2007); Havercamp and Scott (2015); Havercamp
et al. (2004); Krahn et al. (2015); Kuper and Heydt (2019); Kuper and Myroslava (2018); McGrother et al. (2006); Okoro et al. (2018);
Ouellette-Kuntz (2005); Reichard et al., (2011); Rowland et al. (2014); Vanderbom et al. (2018)
35. grc.osu.edu
Perceptions of Quality of Life
• Ray and West 1984: 60% of people with paraplegia reported feeling more
positively about themselves since becoming disabled
• Cushman and Dijkers 1990: Spinal cord injured rehabilitation patients
were similar to the general population on self-ratings of depression, yet
hospital staff consistently overestimated the patients' level of depression
• Gerhart et al. (1994): 86% of spinal cord injured high-level quadriplegics rated
their quality of life as average or better than average.
– Only 17% of their ER doctors, nurses, and technicians thought they would
have an average or better quality of life if they acquired quadriplegia
35
37. grc.osu.edu
Development of Disability Competencies
37
Broad
Consensus
among
stakeholders
Disability Advocates
National Delphi
process
Family Members
Individuals with Disabilities
Healthcare Professionals
Health Educators
Disability Professionals
Havercamp et al. (2020)
39. grc.osu.edu
39
Developed Guiding
Principles and Values and
6 competencies
Interprofessional
Cross-disability
Intellectual disability
Developmental disability
Sensory disability
Mobility disability
1.
Disability
Frameworks
2.
Professionalism
and Patient-
Centered Care
3.
Legal
Obligations &
Responsibilities
4.
Teams and
Systems-
based Practice
Guiding
Principles and
Values
5.
Clinical
Assessment
6.
Clinical
Care
40. grc.osu.edu
40
Shift in Approach
From: Medical model – Disability
is an attribute of the individual and
is equated with pathology
To: Biopsychosocial model –
Disability and functioning are
outcomes of interactions
between health conditions
and the environment
1.
Disability
Frameworks
2.
Professionalism
and Patient-
Centered Care
3.
Legal
Obligations &
Responsibilities
4.
Teams and
Systems-
based
Practice
5.
Clinical
Assessment
6.
Clinical
Care
Guiding
Principles
and Values
42. grc.osu.edu
42
Accessible health care
is a human right
1.
Disability
Frameworks
2.
Professionalis
m and Patient-
Centered Care
3.
Legal
Obligations &
Responsibilities
4.
Teams and
Systems-
based Practice
5.
Clinical
Assessment
6.
Clinical
Care
Guiding
Principles
and Values
43. grc.osu.edu
43
Working with Teams
Gain skills for team-
based practice that
include patients with
disability at the center of
the team
1.
Disability
Frameworks
2.
Professionalis
m and Patient-
Centered Care
3.
Legal
Obligations &
Responsibilities
4.
Teams and
Systems-
based Practice
5.
Clinical
Assessment
6.
Clinical
Care
Guiding
Principles
and Values
44. grc.osu.edu
44
Assessing the
Whole Patient
Conduct exams that
accommodate patients
with disabilities
Consider patient’s physical
environment, socioeconomic
status, and social network
in assessment
1.
Disability
Frameworks
2.
Professionalis
m and Patient-
Centered Care
3.
Legal
Obligations &
Responsibilities
4.
Teams and
Systems-
based Practice
5.
Clinical
Assessment
6.
Clinical
Care
Guiding
Principles
and Values
45. grc.osu.edu
45
1.
Disability
Frameworks
2.
Professionalis
m and Patient-
Centered Care
3.
Legal
Obligations &
Responsibilities
4.
Teams and
Systems-
based Practice
5.
Clinical
Assessment
6.
Clinical
Care
Quality Healthcare
Need age-appropriate screenings,
health education, family planning,
and end-of life care options
Provide accessible resources
that promote healthy lifestyles
and help patients minimize
health risks
Guiding
Principles
and Values
46. grc.osu.edu
• WHO Disability Overview:
• World Report on Disability:
• Rehab 2030: A Call for Action:
• The Missing Billion:
• CDC Disability and Health
Promotion:
46
Suggested Resources to Improve Disability
Competence
47. grc.osu.edu
• FutureLearn Disability Courses:
• Healthcare Access for People with
Disabilities Training for Healthcare
Professionals:
• Human Development Institute
Seminar Series on Disability:
• Other Disability Trainings:
47
Suggested Resources to Improve Disability
Competence
52. grc.osu.edu
References
• World Health Organization (WHO) & the World Bank. World Report on Disability. Published 2011. Accessed December 23,
2020. http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/en.
• World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Published Geneva:
2001. Accessed December 23, 2020. https://www.who.int/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-
disability-and-health.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Disability and Health Overview. Last updated September 16, 2020.
Accessed December 23, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability.html.
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Disability & Health U.S. State Profile Data for Ohio (Adults 18+ years of
age). Last updated June 28, 2021. Accessed August
22, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/impacts/kentucky.html
• Shapiro J. One man’s COVID-19 death raises the worst fears of many people with disabilities. 2020. Available
at https://www.npr.org/2020/07/31/896882268/one-mans-covid-19-death-raises-the-worst-fears-of-many-people-with-
disabilities. Accessed March 3/5/2021.
52
53. grc.osu.edu
References
• Kuper H, Myroslava T. Global Health and Disability. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. 2018. Accessed
December 23, 2020. https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/global-disability.
• The National Center on Physical Activity and Disability (NCHPAD). Discover inclusive events. 2020. Accessed
December 23, 2020. https://www.nchpad.org/1770/6934/Discover~Inclusive~Events.
• Bhaumik S, Watson JM, Thorp CF, Tyrer F, McGrother CW. Body mass index in adults with intellectual disability:
Distribution, associations and service implications: A population‐based prevalence study. Journal of Intellectual Disability
Research, 2008;52(4):287-298.
• Blauwet CA, Iezzoni LI. From the Paralympics to public health: increasing physical activity through legislative and
policy initiatives. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2014;6:S4-S10.
• Burke É, O’Dwyer M, McGlinchey E, Foran S, Phadraig CM, Carroll R, McCallion P, McCarron M. Overview of the
important physical health concerns. In Physical Health of Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (pp. 27-52).
2019. Springer, Cham.
53
54. grc.osu.edu
References
• Cooper SA, Smiley E, Morrison J, Williamson A, Allan, L. Mental ill-health in adults with intellectual disabilities:
Prevalence and associated factors. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2007;190(1):27-35.
• Havercamp SM, Scandlin D, Roth M. Health disparities among adults with developmental disabilities, adults with
other disabilities, and adults not reporting disability in North Carolina. Public Health Reports, 2004;119(4):418-426.
• Havercamp SM, Scott HM. National health surveillance of adults with disabilities, adults with intellectual and
developmental disabilities, and adults with no disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 2015;8(2):165-
172. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.11.002.
• Krahn GL, Walker DK, Correa-De-Araujo R. Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population. American
Journal of Public Health, 2015;105(S2):S198-S206.
• Kuper H, Heydt P. The Missing Billion: Access to Health Services for 1 Billion People with Disabilities. Published July
2019. Accessed December 23, 2020. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/media/38726.
54
55. grc.osu.edu
References
• McGrother CW, Bhaumik S, Thorp CF, Hauck A, Branford D, Watson JM. Epilepsy in adults with intellectual
disabilities: Prevalence, associations and service implications. Seizure, 2006;15(6):376-386.
• Okoro CA, Hollis ND, Cyrus AC, Griffin-Blake S. Prevalence of disabilities and health care access by disability status and type
among adults — United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2018;67:882–887.
• Ouellette‐Kuntz, H. Understanding health disparities and inequities faced by individuals with intellectual
disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2005;18(2):113-121.
• Reichard A, Stolzle H, Fox MH. Health disparities among adults with physical disabilities or cognitive limitations compared
to individuals with no disabilities in the United States. Disability and Health Journal, 2011;4(2):59-67.
• Rowland M, Peterson-Besse J, Dobbertin K, Walsh E, Horner-Johnson W. Health outcome disparities among subgroups
of people with disabilities: a scoping review. Disability and Health Journal, 2014;7:136-150.
55
56. grc.osu.edu
References
• Vanderbom KA, Eisenberg Y, Tubbs AH, Washington T, Martinez AX, Rauworth A. Changing the paradigm in public
health and disability through a knowledge translation center. International Journal of Environmental Research and
Public Health, 2018;15:328.
• Blick R, Franklin M, Ellsworth D, Havercamp S, Kornblau B. The double burden: health disparities among people of color living
with disabilities. The Ohio Disability and Health Program. Published 2015. Accessed December 23,
2020. https://nisonger.osu.edu/sites/default/files/u4/the_double_burden_health_disparities_among_people_of_color_livin
g_with_disabilities.pdf.
• Iezzoni LI, Sowmya RR, Ressalam J, Bolcic-Jankovic D, Agaronnik ND, Donelan K, Lagu T, Campbell EG. Physicians’ perceptions
of people with disability and their health care. Health Affairs, 2021;40(2): https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01452.
• Ray C, West J. Social, sexual, and personal implications of paraplegia. Paraplegia, 1984;22:75-86.
• Cushman LA, Dijkers MP. Depressed mood in spinal cord injured patients: staff perceptions and patient realities. Arch Phys
Med Rehabil, 1990;71(3):191-196.
56
57. grc.osu.edu
References
• Gerhart KA et al. Quality of life following spinal cord injury: knowledge and attitudes of emergency care providers. Annals of
Emergency Medicine, 1994;23(4):807-812.
• Havercamp SM, Barnhart WR, Robinson AC, Whalen Smith CN. What should we teach aboutdisability? National consensus
on disability competencies for health care education. Disabil Health J, 2020; doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100989.
• Alliance for Disability in Health Care Education (The Alliance). Core Competencies on Disability for Health Care Education.
Peapack, NJ: Alliance for Disability in Health Care Education. http://www.adhce.org/. Published June 2019. Accessed
December 23, 2020. https://nisonger.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/post-consensusCore-Competencies-on-
Disability_8.5.19.pdf.
57