Minnesota GIS/LIS The Geospatial Revolution Peter Batty
•
2 likes•1,173 views
My keynote presentation at Minnesota GIS/LIS. Similar to my recent keynote at AGI GeoCommunity in the UK, but with some additional material (50 vs 30 minutes) and a few tweaks. Looks at trends in the geospatial industry in three areas: moving to the mainstream; a real time multimedia view of the world; and crowdsourcing.
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (10)
Similar to Minnesota GIS/LIS The Geospatial Revolution Peter Batty
Similar to Minnesota GIS/LIS The Geospatial Revolution Peter Batty (20)
More from Peter Batty
More from Peter Batty (18)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Minnesota GIS/LIS The Geospatial Revolution Peter Batty
- 1. The Geospatial Revolution Peter Batty Spatial Networking, Enspiria Solutions Minnesota GIS/LIS Conference October 22, 2009 1
- 2. Overview • Mainstream at last! • A real-time, multimedia view of the world • Crowdsourcing 2
- 3. GIS was a specialized backroom technology for many years 3
- 4. “1995: the year that GIS disappeared” Doug Seaborn AM/FM conference, 1992 4
- 5. Disruptive technology Functionality / lo gy performance c hno he d te bl is E sta Mainstream Market requirements lo gy chno e te ru ptiv Dis Time 5
- 6. Now much easier to include location data Free or cheap Location Geocoding map data tracking 6
- 7. Finally, geospatial data is just another data type flickr.com/photos/26664862@N04/2499573972/ 7
- 8. The neogeographers Google Microsoft Open Source ... and more 8
- 9. Geo moving to the mainstream 1996 MapQuest 2005 Google Earth (Keyhole) 2005 Google Maps 9
- 10. Fun and cool Performance Ease of use API Continued innovation 10
- 11. 3D buildings Birds eye view Photosynth SQL Server 11
- 12. 12
- 13. Strong in database Strong in web mapping Weaker on desktop Data improving fast Spans both “GIS” and “neogeo” spaces 13
- 14. “But these new systems are just simple web mapping, they’re not GIS” 14
- 16. 16
- 17. Data creation and maintenance Upcoming Mapzen editor Cloudmade 17
- 18. Data creation and maintenance “Walking Papers” for OpenStreetMap Stamen Design Here’s a print of Chinatown, San Francisco. 18
- 19. Geospatial analysis Stamen Design 19
- 20. Geospatial analysis FortiusOne / GeoCommons 20
- 21. Graphic showing “peace” Maybe hippies holding hands (Shouldn’t fight neogeo vs GIS - all same problem) neogeography = GIS 21
- 22. Data sharing KML GML geoRSS WMS Shape geoJSON WFS Lightweight Heavyweight Mashups OGC Google Search Portals 22
- 23. “If a dataset available on the web is in a format that can't be indexed by Google, does it make a sound?” Kevin Wiebe Safe Software 23
- 24. Jason Birch City of Nanaimo <Picture of Jason> 24
- 25. 25
- 26. 26
- 27. 27
- 28. 28
- 29. 29
- 30. 30
- 31. 31
- 32. 32
- 33. Google Maps now has parcels! 33
- 34. Computing in the cloud 34
- 35. A real-time, multimedia view of the world 35
- 36. September 7, 2009 36
- 37. October 19, 2009 37
- 38. 38
- 39. 39
- 40. 40
- 41. 41
- 42. Microsoft Photosynth 42
- 43. Google Streetview 43
- 44. maps Microsoft Virtual Earth Manhattan 44
- 45. C3 Technologies Las Vegas 45
- 46. prototypegame.org Manhattan 46
- 47. Live Video Live 47
- 48. The Sensor Web Need a spatial context to make sense of all this 48
- 49. Location sensing UWB GPS Wi-Fi RFID Cell towers 49
- 50. New TomTom traffic speed dataset derived from 600 billion speed readings from users real time data within 3 minutes flickr.com/photos/rutlo/3164449930/ 50
- 51. location based services are real at last! 51
- 52. Smart Grid “The Internet brought to our electric system” Storage Renewable Energy Demand Response Intelligent devices and control systems 52
- 53. Will have the ability to know where everything is - and what is happening - all the time 53
- 54. Crowdsourcing 54
- 55. Web Web 1.0 2.0 publishing participation 55
- 56. Wikipedia 56
- 57. Hurricane Katrina New Orleans 57
- 58. Community generated data scipionus.com 58
- 60. 60
- 61. “The future is user created data” Google MapMaker Michael Jones, Google 61
- 62. 62
- 63. OpenStreetMap 63
- 64. December 3, 2007 Google OpenStreetMap July 7, 2009 64
- 65. Denver, CO Denver, CO USA USA “Mousetrap” junction of I-25 and I-70 Cape Royal Grand Canyon, AZ Cropston USA England 65
- 66. 132,764 175,096 users 24m km of highways crazy 34m km of ways momentum!! OSM stats from May 2009 NAVTEQ had 18m km of highways in Dec 2007 flickr.com/photos/pimpmasterjazz/2601898276/ 66
- 67. 67
- 68. What about quality? Dr Muki Haklay of UCL “OSM quality is beyond good enough, it is a product that can be used for a wide range of activities” Based on a detailed analysis http://tinyurl.com/mukiosm 68
- 69. Database 2007 data 69 countries 11m miles (18m km) of roads 18m points of interest People “Creating, maintaining and delivering a comprehensive, high quality map database is a Field force 700 multi-step, labor-intensive process. We Central production 270 currently employ over 270 employees in our centralized production facility and a global Technology 500 workforce of over 700 geographic analysts in 32 countries” Total 3349 Financial Revenue $853m (~€604m) Data creation & distribution costs $396m (~€280m) 69
- 70. Crowdsourcing is a paradigm shift for data creation flickr.com/photos/jamescridland/613445810/ 70
- 71. In summary ... a wild ride ahead! 71
- 72. ? peter.batty@spatialnetworking.com geothought.blogspot.com 72