MGT460.W3A1.02.2015Description .docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•2 views
MGT460.W3A1.02.2015 Description: Total Possible Score: 10.00 Constructs a Goal-Setting Framework for Chosen Issue #1 Total: 2.50 Distinguished - Thoroughly constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #1, including a goal statement, strategies, tactics, activities, measures of success, and goal measurements. Provides clear and supported rationale for all aspects of the goal-setting framework. Proficient - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #1, including a goal statement, strategies, tactics, activities, measures of success, and goal measurements. Provides some supported rationale for all aspects of the goal-setting framework. Basic - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #1, but the framework may be missing some relevant details. Rationale provided may be somewhat unclear, minimally supported, and/or underdeveloped. Below Expectations - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #1, but the framework may be missing some key elements. Rationale is unclear, unsupported, and/or missing. Non-Performance - The goal-setting framework for chosen issue #1 is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Constructs a Goal-Setting Framework for Chosen Issue #2 Total: 2.50 Distinguished - Thoroughly constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #2, including a goal statement, strategies, tactics, activities, measures of success, and goal measurements. Provides clear and supported rationale for all aspects of the goal-setting framework. Proficient - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #2, including a goal statement, strategies, tactics, activities, measures of success, and goal measurements. Provides some rationale for all aspects of the goal-setting framework. Basic - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #2, but the framework may be missing some relevant details. Rationale may be somewhat unclear, minimally supported, and/or underdeveloped. Below Expectations - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #2, but the framework may be missing some key elements. Rationale is unclear, unsupported, and/or missing. Non-Performance - The goal-setting framework for chosen issue #2 is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Constructs a Goal-Setting Framework for Chosen Issue #3 Total: 2.50 Distinguished - Thoroughly constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #3, including a goal statement, strategies, tactics, activities, measures of success, and goal measurements. Provides clear and supported rationale for all aspects of the goal-setting framework. Proficient - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #3, including a goal statement, strategies, tactics, activities, measures of success, and goal me ...
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
MGT330.W3A1.03.2015DescriptionTotal Possible Score 15.00.docx
MGT330.W3A1.03.2015
Description:
Total Possible Score: 15.00
Organization: Introduction, Thesis Statement, and Conclusion
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - The paper is well organized with the introduction that provides sufficient background on the topic, thesis statement, and the conclusion that is logical, smoothly flows from the body of the paper.
Proficient - The paper is organized with the introduction that provides background on the topic, thesis statement, and the conclusion that is logical but not quite smooth.
Basic - The paper is organized with the introduction and the conclusion, but the introduction and/or the conclusion require improvement.
Below Expectations - The paper is loosely organized with the introduction and the conclusion, and the introduction and/or the conclusion require much improvement.
Non-Performance - The introduction and the conclusion are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains the Chosen Job Design
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Provides a comprehensive and expertly crafted explanation of the chosen job design that identifies the standard approach to job design presented in chapter 3: (a) job analysis, (b) job description and (c) job specification.
Proficient - Provides a complete job design. The work identifies the standard approach to job design presented in chapter 3: (a) job analysis, (b) job description and (c) job specification. The job design is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Provides a limited job design. The work identifies some of the standard approach to job design presented in chapter 3: (a) job analysis, (b) job description and (c) job specification. The job design is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Provides a poorly developed job design. The work includes a few if any of the standard approach to job design presented in chapter 3: (a) job analysis, (b) job description and (c) job specification. The job design is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The explanation of the chosen job design is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains the Chosen Organizational Design
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Provides a comprehensive explanation of the chosen organizational design. Effectively applies course concepts to this explanation.
Proficient - Provides an explanation of the chosen organizational design. Applies course concepts, but the organizational design is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Provides limited explanation of the chosen organizational design. Somewhat applies course concepts. The organizational design is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Provides a minimal explanation of the chosen organizational design. Does not apply course concepts. The organizational design is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The explanation of the chosen organizational design is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains the Rec ...
DescriptionTotal Possible Score 30.00Introduction Thesi.docx
Description:
Total Possible Score: 30.00
Introduction/ Thesis Statement
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Introduction and thesis statement are thoroughly and comprehensively developed, giving a clear direction and purpose of the paper.
Proficient - Introduction and thesis statement are clearly developed and provide some direction and purpose of the paper.
Basic - Introduction and thesis statement are present and somewhat provide direction and purpose of the paper.
Below Expectations - Introduction and thesis statement are present, but incomplete. The direction and purpose of the paper is unclear.
Non-Performance - The introduction and thesis statement are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Company Overview
Total: 5.00
Distinguished - Provides an exceptionally clear and detailed company overview.
Proficient - Provides a clear company overview. Some minor relevant information is missing.
Basic - Provides a minimal company overview. Many relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to provide a company overview. The overview is somewhat incomplete and/or inaccurate.
Non-Performance - The company overview is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Diagnoses the Need for Change
Total: 7.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively and accurately diagnoses the need for change within the selected organization.
Proficient - Diagnoses the need for change within the selected organization. Some relevant details may be missing.
Basic - Minimally diagnoses the need for change within the selected organization. Many relevant details may be missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to diagnose the need for change within the selected organization. The need for change may be insufficiently described and/or inaccurate.
Non-Performance - The diagnosis of the need for change is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Presents a Plan to Transform the Organization
Total: 7.00
Distinguished - Presents a well-structured, highly detailed, and perceptive plan to transform the organization. Effectively uses Kotter’s 8-Step Approach in the development of the plan.
Proficient - Presents a concise plan to transform the organization. Uses Kotter’s 8-Step Approach in the development of plan. The plan is lacking some detail.
Basic - Presents a brief plan to transform the organization. Somewhat uses Kotter’s 8-Step Approach in the development of the plan. The plan lacks detail and/or organizational structure.
Below Expectations - Attempts to present a plan to transform the organization. May not use all elements of Kotter’s 8-Step Approach in the development of the plan. The plan lacks significant detail and/or there is little organizational structure.
Non-Performance - The plan to transform the organization is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Conclusion
Total: 3.00.
Grading RubricDescription Total Possible Score 20.00Stan.docx
Grading Rubric
Description:
Total Possible Score: 20.00
Standard and Learning Objective
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Lists the selected pathway from Week One, the standard, and learning objectives.
Proficient - Lists the selected pathway from Week One, the standard, and learning objectives. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Lists the selected pathway from Week One, the standard, and learning objectives. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to list the selected pathway from Week One, the standard, and learning objectives; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The selected pathway from Week One, the standard, and learning objectives are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Formative Assessment
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly describes the importance of formative assessment and explains the three different ways to formatively assess learners based on the standard and learning objective selected.
Proficient - Describes the importance of formative assessment and explains the three different ways to formatively assess learners based on the standard and learning objective selected. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Minimally describes the importance of formative assessment and explains the three different ways to formatively assess learners based on the standard and learning objective selected. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the importance of formative assessment and explains the three different ways to formatively assess learners based on the standard and learning objective selected; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The description of the importance of formative assessment and explanation of the three different ways to formatively assess learners based on the standard and learning objective selected are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Development of Summative Assessment
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Includes the test blueprint and lists 10 detailed questions developed in Week Three, making any necessary revisions based on the instructor’s feedback.
Proficient - Includes the test blueprint and lists the 10 questions developed in Week Three, making any necessary revisions based on the instructor’s feedback. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Includes a partial test blueprint and lists questions developed in Week Three, making any necessary revisions based on the instructor’s feedback. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to include the test blueprint and list the 10 questions developed in Week Three, making any necessary revisions based on the instructor’s feedback; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The test blueprint and 10 questions developed in Week Three are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Development of Rubric for ...
COM425.W5A1.05.2015Description .docx
COM425.W5A1.05.2015
Description:
Total Possible Score: 25.00
Develops an Introduction and Thesis Statement
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Develops a comprehensive introduction, and includes a thesis
statement giving a clear direction and purpose of the paper.
Proficient - Develops an introduction, and includes a thesis statement giving
some direction and purpose of the paper.
Basic - Develops a limited introduction and includes a thesis statement that
somewhat gives direction and purpose of the paper.
Below Expectations - Develops an introduction and thesis statement; however, the
direction and purpose of the paper is unclear.
Non-Performance - The development of an introduction and thesis statement is
either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment
instructions.
Identifies Five Concepts That Are Important For Successful Communication Within
an Organizational Setting
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Clearly identifies five concepts that are important for
successful communication within an organizational setting.
Proficient - Identifies four concepts that are important for successful
communication within an organizational setting. Minor details are slightly
unclear.
Basic - Identifies three concepts that are important for successful
communication within an organizational setting. Relevant details are unclear.
Below Expectations - Identifies two or fewer concepts that are important for
successful communication within an organizational setting. Significant details
are unclear.
Non-Performance - The identification of five concepts that are important for
successful communication within an organizational setting is either nonexistent
or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Discusses Why Each Concept Identified Is Necessary For Successful Communication
Total: 5.00
Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively discusses why each concept
identified is necessary for successful communication. The discussion is fully
supported with scholarly sources.
Proficient - Clearly discusses why each concept identified is necessary for
successful communication. The discussion is supported with scholarly sources but
minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially discusses why each concept identified is necessary for
successful communication. The discussion is somewhat supported with scholarly
sources and relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss why each concept identified is
necessary for successful communication; however, the discussion is not supported
with scholarly sources and significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The discussion of why each concept identified is necessary for
successful communication is either nonexistent or lacks the components described
in the assignment instructions.
Explains How Best ...
MGT415.W5A1.10.2014Description .docx
This document provides scoring rubrics for an assignment on organizational behavior. It includes sections on introduction, impacting group productivity, recommendations, company-wide training, conclusion, integrative learning, critical thinking, writing skills, APA formatting, page requirements, and resource requirements. Each section lists the criteria for distinguished, proficient, basic, below expectations, and non-performance levels of completion. The total possible points are provided for each section and the document provides an overview of the assessment criteria for the assignment.
Total Possible Score 7.00Explains how to Differentiate the Co.docx
Total Possible Score: 7.00
Explains how to Differentiate the Content, Process, and Product Based on Student Readiness for Mary
Total: 1.80
Distinguished - Comprehensively explains how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student readiness for Mary. The differentiation is clearly appropriate for the student’s readiness.
Proficient - Explains how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student readiness for Mary. The differentiation is mostly appropriate for the student’s readiness.
Basic - Minimally explains how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student readiness for Mary. The differentiation is somewhat appropriate for the student’s readiness.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student readiness for Mary; however, the differentiation is not appropriate for the student’s readiness.
Non-Performance - The explanation of differentiating content, process, and product based on student readiness for Mary is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains how to Differentiate the Content, Process, and Product Based on Student Interest for Davion
Total: 1.80
Distinguished - Comprehensively explains how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student interest for Davion. The differentiation is clearly appropriate for the student’s interest.
Proficient - Explains how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student interest for Davion. The differentiation is mostly appropriate for the student’s interest.
Basic - Minimally explains how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student interest for Davion. The differentiation is somewhat appropriate for the student’s interest.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student interest for Davion however, the differentiation is not appropriate for the student’s interest.
Non-Performance - The explanation of differentiating content, process, and product based on student interest for Davion is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains Rationale For Methods Used in Differentiating Content, Process, and Product For Mary and Davion
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively explains the rationale for methods used in differentiating content, process, and product for Mary and Davion.
Proficient - Explains the rationale for methods used in differentiating content, process, and product for Mary and Davion. The rationale is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Partially explains the rationale for methods used in differentiating content, process, and product for Mary and Davion. The rationale ...
BUS370.W3A1.04.2021Description Total Possible Score
The document describes the evaluation phase of an action research process used to assess a leadership development program for public health managers. Key points:
- Evaluation involves assessing changes, adjusting processes based on findings, and deciding to terminate the process or repeat it based on whether intended outcomes were achieved.
- The leadership program was evaluated through ongoing data collection and feedback during implementation to make adjustments.
- Upon completion of the first cohort, the internal consultant team took over running the program while continuing periodic evaluation meetings.
Case Study Opening Your New Dunkin Donuts LocationsAssumption a.docx
You have been promoted to District Manager of five new Dunkin Donuts locations. As District Manager, you will be responsible for structuring, staffing, and operating the new locations. Your paper will explain your chosen job design, organizational design, recruiting strategy and methods, and training and performance appraisal process for the new locations. You will organize your five-page paper with an introduction, sections on job design, organizational design, recruiting and selection, training and performance appraisals, and a conclusion.
Recommended
MGT330.W3A1.03.2015DescriptionTotal Possible Score 15.00.docx
MGT330.W3A1.03.2015
Description:
Total Possible Score: 15.00
Organization: Introduction, Thesis Statement, and Conclusion
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - The paper is well organized with the introduction that provides sufficient background on the topic, thesis statement, and the conclusion that is logical, smoothly flows from the body of the paper.
Proficient - The paper is organized with the introduction that provides background on the topic, thesis statement, and the conclusion that is logical but not quite smooth.
Basic - The paper is organized with the introduction and the conclusion, but the introduction and/or the conclusion require improvement.
Below Expectations - The paper is loosely organized with the introduction and the conclusion, and the introduction and/or the conclusion require much improvement.
Non-Performance - The introduction and the conclusion are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains the Chosen Job Design
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Provides a comprehensive and expertly crafted explanation of the chosen job design that identifies the standard approach to job design presented in chapter 3: (a) job analysis, (b) job description and (c) job specification.
Proficient - Provides a complete job design. The work identifies the standard approach to job design presented in chapter 3: (a) job analysis, (b) job description and (c) job specification. The job design is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Provides a limited job design. The work identifies some of the standard approach to job design presented in chapter 3: (a) job analysis, (b) job description and (c) job specification. The job design is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Provides a poorly developed job design. The work includes a few if any of the standard approach to job design presented in chapter 3: (a) job analysis, (b) job description and (c) job specification. The job design is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The explanation of the chosen job design is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains the Chosen Organizational Design
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Provides a comprehensive explanation of the chosen organizational design. Effectively applies course concepts to this explanation.
Proficient - Provides an explanation of the chosen organizational design. Applies course concepts, but the organizational design is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Provides limited explanation of the chosen organizational design. Somewhat applies course concepts. The organizational design is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Provides a minimal explanation of the chosen organizational design. Does not apply course concepts. The organizational design is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The explanation of the chosen organizational design is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains the Rec ...
DescriptionTotal Possible Score 30.00Introduction Thesi.docx
Description:
Total Possible Score: 30.00
Introduction/ Thesis Statement
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Introduction and thesis statement are thoroughly and comprehensively developed, giving a clear direction and purpose of the paper.
Proficient - Introduction and thesis statement are clearly developed and provide some direction and purpose of the paper.
Basic - Introduction and thesis statement are present and somewhat provide direction and purpose of the paper.
Below Expectations - Introduction and thesis statement are present, but incomplete. The direction and purpose of the paper is unclear.
Non-Performance - The introduction and thesis statement are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Company Overview
Total: 5.00
Distinguished - Provides an exceptionally clear and detailed company overview.
Proficient - Provides a clear company overview. Some minor relevant information is missing.
Basic - Provides a minimal company overview. Many relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to provide a company overview. The overview is somewhat incomplete and/or inaccurate.
Non-Performance - The company overview is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Diagnoses the Need for Change
Total: 7.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively and accurately diagnoses the need for change within the selected organization.
Proficient - Diagnoses the need for change within the selected organization. Some relevant details may be missing.
Basic - Minimally diagnoses the need for change within the selected organization. Many relevant details may be missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to diagnose the need for change within the selected organization. The need for change may be insufficiently described and/or inaccurate.
Non-Performance - The diagnosis of the need for change is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Presents a Plan to Transform the Organization
Total: 7.00
Distinguished - Presents a well-structured, highly detailed, and perceptive plan to transform the organization. Effectively uses Kotter’s 8-Step Approach in the development of the plan.
Proficient - Presents a concise plan to transform the organization. Uses Kotter’s 8-Step Approach in the development of plan. The plan is lacking some detail.
Basic - Presents a brief plan to transform the organization. Somewhat uses Kotter’s 8-Step Approach in the development of the plan. The plan lacks detail and/or organizational structure.
Below Expectations - Attempts to present a plan to transform the organization. May not use all elements of Kotter’s 8-Step Approach in the development of the plan. The plan lacks significant detail and/or there is little organizational structure.
Non-Performance - The plan to transform the organization is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Conclusion
Total: 3.00.
Grading RubricDescription Total Possible Score 20.00Stan.docx
Grading Rubric
Description:
Total Possible Score: 20.00
Standard and Learning Objective
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Lists the selected pathway from Week One, the standard, and learning objectives.
Proficient - Lists the selected pathway from Week One, the standard, and learning objectives. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Lists the selected pathway from Week One, the standard, and learning objectives. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to list the selected pathway from Week One, the standard, and learning objectives; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The selected pathway from Week One, the standard, and learning objectives are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Formative Assessment
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly describes the importance of formative assessment and explains the three different ways to formatively assess learners based on the standard and learning objective selected.
Proficient - Describes the importance of formative assessment and explains the three different ways to formatively assess learners based on the standard and learning objective selected. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Minimally describes the importance of formative assessment and explains the three different ways to formatively assess learners based on the standard and learning objective selected. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the importance of formative assessment and explains the three different ways to formatively assess learners based on the standard and learning objective selected; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The description of the importance of formative assessment and explanation of the three different ways to formatively assess learners based on the standard and learning objective selected are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Development of Summative Assessment
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Includes the test blueprint and lists 10 detailed questions developed in Week Three, making any necessary revisions based on the instructor’s feedback.
Proficient - Includes the test blueprint and lists the 10 questions developed in Week Three, making any necessary revisions based on the instructor’s feedback. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Includes a partial test blueprint and lists questions developed in Week Three, making any necessary revisions based on the instructor’s feedback. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to include the test blueprint and list the 10 questions developed in Week Three, making any necessary revisions based on the instructor’s feedback; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The test blueprint and 10 questions developed in Week Three are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Development of Rubric for ...
COM425.W5A1.05.2015Description .docx
COM425.W5A1.05.2015
Description:
Total Possible Score: 25.00
Develops an Introduction and Thesis Statement
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Develops a comprehensive introduction, and includes a thesis
statement giving a clear direction and purpose of the paper.
Proficient - Develops an introduction, and includes a thesis statement giving
some direction and purpose of the paper.
Basic - Develops a limited introduction and includes a thesis statement that
somewhat gives direction and purpose of the paper.
Below Expectations - Develops an introduction and thesis statement; however, the
direction and purpose of the paper is unclear.
Non-Performance - The development of an introduction and thesis statement is
either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment
instructions.
Identifies Five Concepts That Are Important For Successful Communication Within
an Organizational Setting
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Clearly identifies five concepts that are important for
successful communication within an organizational setting.
Proficient - Identifies four concepts that are important for successful
communication within an organizational setting. Minor details are slightly
unclear.
Basic - Identifies three concepts that are important for successful
communication within an organizational setting. Relevant details are unclear.
Below Expectations - Identifies two or fewer concepts that are important for
successful communication within an organizational setting. Significant details
are unclear.
Non-Performance - The identification of five concepts that are important for
successful communication within an organizational setting is either nonexistent
or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Discusses Why Each Concept Identified Is Necessary For Successful Communication
Total: 5.00
Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively discusses why each concept
identified is necessary for successful communication. The discussion is fully
supported with scholarly sources.
Proficient - Clearly discusses why each concept identified is necessary for
successful communication. The discussion is supported with scholarly sources but
minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially discusses why each concept identified is necessary for
successful communication. The discussion is somewhat supported with scholarly
sources and relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss why each concept identified is
necessary for successful communication; however, the discussion is not supported
with scholarly sources and significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The discussion of why each concept identified is necessary for
successful communication is either nonexistent or lacks the components described
in the assignment instructions.
Explains How Best ...
MGT415.W5A1.10.2014Description .docx
This document provides scoring rubrics for an assignment on organizational behavior. It includes sections on introduction, impacting group productivity, recommendations, company-wide training, conclusion, integrative learning, critical thinking, writing skills, APA formatting, page requirements, and resource requirements. Each section lists the criteria for distinguished, proficient, basic, below expectations, and non-performance levels of completion. The total possible points are provided for each section and the document provides an overview of the assessment criteria for the assignment.
Total Possible Score 7.00Explains how to Differentiate the Co.docx
Total Possible Score: 7.00
Explains how to Differentiate the Content, Process, and Product Based on Student Readiness for Mary
Total: 1.80
Distinguished - Comprehensively explains how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student readiness for Mary. The differentiation is clearly appropriate for the student’s readiness.
Proficient - Explains how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student readiness for Mary. The differentiation is mostly appropriate for the student’s readiness.
Basic - Minimally explains how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student readiness for Mary. The differentiation is somewhat appropriate for the student’s readiness.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student readiness for Mary; however, the differentiation is not appropriate for the student’s readiness.
Non-Performance - The explanation of differentiating content, process, and product based on student readiness for Mary is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains how to Differentiate the Content, Process, and Product Based on Student Interest for Davion
Total: 1.80
Distinguished - Comprehensively explains how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student interest for Davion. The differentiation is clearly appropriate for the student’s interest.
Proficient - Explains how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student interest for Davion. The differentiation is mostly appropriate for the student’s interest.
Basic - Minimally explains how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student interest for Davion. The differentiation is somewhat appropriate for the student’s interest.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain how to differentiate the given lesson plan for content, process, and product based on student interest for Davion however, the differentiation is not appropriate for the student’s interest.
Non-Performance - The explanation of differentiating content, process, and product based on student interest for Davion is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains Rationale For Methods Used in Differentiating Content, Process, and Product For Mary and Davion
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively explains the rationale for methods used in differentiating content, process, and product for Mary and Davion.
Proficient - Explains the rationale for methods used in differentiating content, process, and product for Mary and Davion. The rationale is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Partially explains the rationale for methods used in differentiating content, process, and product for Mary and Davion. The rationale ...
BUS370.W3A1.04.2021Description Total Possible Score
The document describes the evaluation phase of an action research process used to assess a leadership development program for public health managers. Key points:
- Evaluation involves assessing changes, adjusting processes based on findings, and deciding to terminate the process or repeat it based on whether intended outcomes were achieved.
- The leadership program was evaluated through ongoing data collection and feedback during implementation to make adjustments.
- Upon completion of the first cohort, the internal consultant team took over running the program while continuing periodic evaluation meetings.
Case Study Opening Your New Dunkin Donuts LocationsAssumption a.docx
You have been promoted to District Manager of five new Dunkin Donuts locations. As District Manager, you will be responsible for structuring, staffing, and operating the new locations. Your paper will explain your chosen job design, organizational design, recruiting strategy and methods, and training and performance appraisal process for the new locations. You will organize your five-page paper with an introduction, sections on job design, organizational design, recruiting and selection, training and performance appraisals, and a conclusion.
Strategic Planning ProcessIn a four- to five-page paper (exc.docx
Strategic Planning Process
In a four- to five-page paper (excluding the title and references pages), discuss the strategic planning process. In your paper:
Explain the basic steps in the planning process.
Describe the steps in the decision-making process, and predict how the personal attributes of the manager influence decision making.
Predict how the steps of the strategic planning process and the environmental factors that influence decision making impact the quality-productivity-profitability link.
Your paper must include in-text citations and references from at least three scholarly sources, in addition to the text, and be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the
Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
.
Description
:
Total Possible Score
: 7.00
Explains the Basic Steps in the Planning Process
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively explains the basic steps in the planning process. The explanation includes supportive scholarly sources and concepts from the text.
Proficient - Explains the basic steps in the planning process. The explanation includes supportive scholarly sources and concepts from the text but is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Partially explains the basic steps in the planning process. The explanation includes some supportive scholarly sources and concepts from the text, but is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the basic steps in the planning process; however, the explanation does not include supportive scholarly sources and concepts from the text and/or is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The explanation of the basic steps in the planning process is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describing the Steps in the Decision-Making Process and Predicts how the Personal Attributes of the Manager Influence Decision Making
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively describes the steps in the decision-making process and predicts how the personal attributes of the manager influence decision making. The description includes supportive scholarly sources and concepts from the text.
Proficient - Describes the steps in the decision-making process and predicts how the personal attributes of the manager influence decision making. The description includes supportive scholarly sources and concepts from the text. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Partially describes the steps in the decision-making process and somewhat predicts how the personal attributes of the manager influence decision making. The description includes some supportive scholarly sources and concepts from the text. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the steps in the decision-making process and predict how the personal attributes of the manager influence decision making; however, the description does not include supportive scholarly sources and concep ...
Contemporary LeadershipWrite a three page paper (not including t
Contemporary Leadership
Write a three page paper (not including the title and reference pages) about a contemporary leadership situation that is familiar to you. Your paper needs to:
Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Identify the development level and style demonstrated in the situation.
Support your position with specific examples.
Explain whether the action taken was appropriate and effective.
Determine and discuss if the situational leadership approach would be useful in understanding the leadership applied to the situation.
In addition to the requirements above, your paper:
Must be double-spaced and 12 point font
Must be formatted according to APA style
Must include an introductory paragraph with a thesis statement
Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph
Must reference at least two scholarly resources
Must include a reference page written in APA format
Rubric
Identify the Development Level and Leadership Style
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly and comprehensively identifies the development level and leadership style demonstrated in the situation. Clearly describes the leadership style, supported by relevant examples.
Proficient - Identifies the development level and leadership style demonstrated in the situation. The discussion provides an example, but is missing one or more minor details.
Basic - Briefly describes the development level and leadership style demonstrated in the situation. The discussion lacks examples and detail.
Below Expectations - The discussion does not identify the development level and style demonstrated in the situation. The position is not supported by specific examples.
Non-Performance - The discussion of development level and style demonstrated is non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Appropriate and Effective Action
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Provides a comprehensive explanation of whether the correct action was taken. The response clearly addresses whether the action was appropriate and effective.
Proficient - Provides an explanation of whether the action taken was correct. Limited discussion on whether the action was appropriate and effective.
Basic - Provides a limited explanation of whether the action taken was correct. The response does not include rationale of why the action was appropriate and how it was effective.
Below Expectations - Provides a response that does not clearly explain whether the action taken was correct, appropriate, or effective. The response is vague and lacks support.
Non-Performance - The discussion of the action taken is non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
The Situational Leadership Approach
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively discusses the situational leadership approach, and provides detailed information on how the approa ...
SOC402.W5A1.07.2015Description .docx
SOC402.W5A1.07.2015
Description:
Total Possible Score: 25.00
Discusses the Chosen Issue from Both the Workplace and Societal Viewpoints,
Including the Positive and Negative Aspects of the Issue in Relation to the
Workplace, Society, and Workers, Especially the Unique Worker Groups who May be
Most Affected
Total: 6.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively discusses the chosen issue from both the
workplace and societal viewpoints, including the positive and negative aspects
of the issue in relation to the workplace, society, and workers, especially the
unique worker groups who may be most affected.
Proficient - Discusses the chosen issue from both the workplace and societal
viewpoints, including the positive and negative aspects of the issue in relation
to the workplace, society, and workers, especially the unique worker groups who
may be most affected. The discussion is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Minimally discusses the chosen issue from both the workplace and
societal viewpoints, including the positive and negative aspects of the issue in
relation to the workplace, society, and workers, especially the unique worker
groups who may be most affected. The discussion is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss the chosen issue from both the
workplace and societal viewpoints, including the positive and negative aspects
of the issue in relation to the workplace, society, and workers, especially the
unique worker groups who may be most affected; however the discussion is
significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The discussion of the chosen issue from both the workplace and
societal viewpoints, including the positive and negative aspects of the issue in
relation to the workplace, society, and workers, especially the unique worker
groups who may be most affected is either nonexistent or lacks the components
described in the assignment instructions.
Analyzes how the Chosen Issue could be Positively Supported using Various Social
Controls
Total: 7.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively analyzes how the chosen issue could be
positively supported using various social controls.
Proficient - Analyzes how the chosen issue could be positively supported using
various social controls. The analysis is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Minimally analyzes how the chosen issue could be positively supported
using various social controls. The analysis is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to analyze how the chosen issue could be
positively supported using various social controls; however, the analysis is
significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The analysis of how the chosen issue could be positively
supported using various social controls are either nonexistent or lacks the
components described in the assignment instructions.
Recommends Interventions in these Areas as well as the P ...
Communications Skill AssessmentMost of us have situations in whi.docx
Communications Skill Assessment
Most of us have situations in which we find it difficult to communicate. Improving your written communication skills and being comfortable speaking to people are extremely important. Develop a two- to three-page APA-formatted paper in which you analyze your personal communication skills. Be sure to address the following:
Describe the assessment you used to analyze your skills.
Discuss your communication gaps.
Describe any additional training you need in specific areas of communication.
Analyze how you can improve your current communication skills to prepare you for advancement in your profession.
Your paper must be two to three pages (not including title and reference pages) and must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide. You must cite three to four scholarly sources in addition to the textbook
Carefully review the
Grading Rubric
for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Description
:
Total Possible Score
: 8.00
Describes the Assessment
Total: 1.50
Distinguished - Comprehensively describes the assessment used to analyze personal communication skills.
Proficient - Describes the assessment used to analyze personal communication skills. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Partially describes the assessment used to analyze personal communication skills. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the assessment used to analyze personal communication skills; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The description of the assessment used is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Discusses Communication Gaps
Total: 1.50
Distinguished - Thoroughly discusses personal communication gaps.
Proficient - Discusses personal communication gaps. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Briefly discusses personal communication gaps. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss personal communication gaps; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The discussion of communication gaps is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes Additional Training Needed in Specific Areas of Communication
Total: 1.50
Distinguished - Fully describes additional training needed in specific areas of communication.
Proficient - Describes additional training needed in specific areas of communication. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Partially describes additional training needed in specific areas of communication. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe additional training needed in specific areas of communication; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The description of additional training needed in specific areas of communication is either nonexistent or lacks the comp ...
MGT450.W5A1.06.2014Description .docx
MGT450.W5A1.06.2014
Description:
Total Possible Score: 19.00
Selects an Organization and Describes Its History, Products, and Major
Competitors
Total: 2.50
Distinguished - Selects an organization and thoroughly describes its history,
products, and major competitors.
Proficient - Selects an organization and describes its history, products, and
major competitors. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Selects an organization and partially describes its history, products,
and major competitors. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Selects an organization and attempts to describe its
history, products, and major competitors; however, significant details are
missing.
Non-Performance - The description of the selected organization’s history,
products, and major competitors is either nonexistent or lacks the components
described in the assignment instructions.
Explains the Current Situation of the Organization in the Market
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly explains the current situation of the organization in
the market.
Proficient - Explains the current situation of the organization in the market.
Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially explains the current situation of the organization in the
market. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the current situation of the
organization in the market; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The explanation of the current situation of the organization
in the market is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
assignment instructions.
Develops a SWOT Analysis to Determine Areas That Offer Opportunities for Change
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Develops a comprehensive SWOT analysis to determine areas that
offer opportunities for change. The analysis is thoroughly supported with
scholarly sources.
Proficient - Develops a SWOT analysis to determine areas that offer
opportunities for change. The analysis is supported with scholarly sources but
is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Develops a limited SWOT analysis to determine areas that offer
opportunities for change. The analysis is minimally supported with scholarly
sources and/or is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to develop a SWOT analysis to determine areas that
offer opportunities for change; however, the analysis is not supported with
scholarly sources and/or is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The development of SWOT analysis to determine areas that offer
opportunities for change is either nonexistent or lacks the components described
in the assignment instructions.
Chooses at Least Three Areas From the SWOT Analysis and Explains Why the Chosen
Areas are Essential to the Strategic Plan
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Chooses at least three areas from th ...
DescriptionTotal Possible Score 20.00ePortfolio - Compon.docx
Description:
Total Possible Score: 20.00
ePortfolio - Components
Total: 5.00
Distinguished - Includes at least one artifact that fully demonstrates mastery of each of the nine MAED Program Learning Outcomes.
Proficient - Includes one artifact that demonstrates mastery of the nine MAED Program Learning Outcomes.
Basic - Includes one artifact that somewhat demonstrates mastery of at least eight MAED Program Learning Outcomes.
Below Expectations - Includes one artifact that minimally demonstrates mastery of each of fewer than seven MAED Program Learning Outcomes.
Non-Performance - The artifact is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
ePortfolio - Design
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Effectively designs an ePortfolio that is professional in appearance, has visual appeal, and exemplifies effective and ethical uses of technology.
Proficient - Adequately designs an ePortfolio that is professional in appearance, has visual appeal, and exemplifies effective and ethical uses of technology. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Minimally designs an ePortfolio that is somewhat professional in appearance, has limited visual appeal, and vaguely exemplifies effective and ethical uses of technology. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Ineffectively designs an ePortfolio that is not professional in appearance, does not have visual appeal, and/or does not exemplify effective and ethical uses of technology. Significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The design of the ePortfolio is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Narrative - Ranking
Total: 5.00
Distinguished - Effectively ranks and thoroughly discusses the importance and use of each Program Learning Outcome in a work setting.
Proficient - Adequately ranks and discusses the importance and use of each Program Learning Outcome in a work setting. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Minimally ranks and partially discusses the importance and use of each Program Learning Outcome in a work setting. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Ineffectively ranks and attempts to discuss the importance and use of each Program Learning Outcome in a work setting. Significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The ranking and discussion of the importance and use of each Program Learning Outcome are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Narrative - Challenges/
Solution
s
Total: 5.00
Distinguished - Effectively discusses the design and development challenges experienced while creating the ePortfolio and explains how challenges were overcome.
Proficient - Adequately discusses the design and development challenges experienced while creating the ePortfolio and explains how challenges were overcome. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Minimally discusses the design and development challenges experienced while creating the ePortfolio and explains how chal.
Each week’s assignment in this class will lead up to the Research .docx
Each week’s assignment in this class will lead up to the Research Project in Week Six. Before you work on Week One’s assignment, preview the Research Project in Week Six so you understand the final outcome of this project. Also read this week’s lecture. If you are having a difficult time choosing your topic, please contact your instructor for assistance before the assignment is due.
In a one-to two-page paper (not including the title and reference pages), provide
Background information about your Research Project (i.e., why have you decided to do this research?).
The management dilemma. (i.e., what is the problem you are trying to solve with this research?)
The research question and a hypothesis.
A brief summary of previously conducted scholarly research on similar topics that you can find through the Ashford University Library.
Your paper must be formatted according to APA style
Provides Background Information About the Research Project
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Provides comprehensive background information about the Research Project.
Proficient - Provides background information about the Research Project. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Provides limited background information about the Research Project. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to provide background information about the Research Project; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The background information provided about the Research Project is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes the Management Dilemma
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly describes the management dilemma.
Proficient - Describes the management dilemma. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Somewhat describes the management dilemma. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describes the management dilemma; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The description of the management dilemma is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Develops a Research Question and Hypothesis
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Develops an accurate and detailed research question and hypothesis.
Proficient - Develops an accurate research question and hypothesis. The research question or hypothesis is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Partially develops a research question and hypothesis. The research question and hypothesis is inaccurate and/or underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to develop a research question and hypothesis; however, the research question and hypothesis are inaccurate and/or significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The research question and hypothesis developed are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Provides a Summary of Previously Conducted Scholarly Research on Similar Topics
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Provides a detailed .
Explain How these Aspects Work Together to Perform the Primary Fun.docx
Explain How these Aspects Work Together to Perform the Primary Function of HRM
Total: 5.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly and methodically explains how each of the aspects work together to perform the primary function of HRM. The explanation is professional and provides detailed examples that clearly demonstrate that new learning has occurred.
Proficient - Explains how each of the aspects work together to perform the primary function of HRM. The explanation is well constructed and provides several examples that demonstrate that new learning has occurred; however, a few minor details are missing.
Basic - Briefly explains how each of the aspects work together to perform the primary function of HRM. The explanation is somewhat complete, but provides few examples that demonstrate that new learning has occurred. Several key details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain how each of the aspects work together to perform the primary function of HRM, but the explanation is too underdeveloped to be considered complete and does not demonstrate that new learning has occurred.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or fails to explain how these aspects work together to perform the primary function of HRM.
Are Any Aspects More Important than the Others? Why or Why Not?
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively explains whether or not any aspects are more important than others, including a detailed reasoning as to why. The explanation is professional and provides detailed examples that clearly demonstrate that new learning has occurred.
Proficient - Explains whether or not any aspects are more important than others, including reasoning as to why. The explanation well-written and provides a few examples that demonstrate that new learning has occurred. One or more minor details may be missing.
Basic - Briefly explains whether or not any aspects are more important than others, including a short reasoning as to why. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped and somewhat demonstrates that new learning has occurred. Several key details may be missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain whether or not any aspects are more important than others, but the explanation is too underdeveloped to be considered complete and does not demonstrate that new learning has occurred.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or fails to determine whether or not and aspects are more important than others.
Optimizing the HRM Role for Shaping Organizational and Employee Behavior
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Provides a comprehensive and thorough discussion addressing how the HRM role can be optimized for shaping organizational and employee behavior. The discussion is thought-provoking, creative, and utilizes vocabulary and concepts from the text.
Proficient - Provides a discussion addressing how the HRM role can be optimized for shaping organizational and employee behavior. The discussion is mostly complete and attempts to utilize voca ...
ACC205.W5A2.03.2013Description Total Possible Score 29.00O.docx
ACC205.W5A2.03.2013
Description:
Total Possible Score: 29.00
Organization: Introduction, Thesis Statement, and Conclusion
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Paper is logically organized with a well-written introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion.
Proficient - Paper is logically organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. One of these requires improvement.
Basic - Paper is organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. One or more of the introduction, thesis statement, and/or conclusion require improvement.
Below Expectations - Paper is loosely organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. The introduction, thesis statement, and/or conclusion require much improvement.
Non-Performance - The introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Selects and Provides an Overview of the Chosen Company
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Provides a thorough overview of the chosen company, including the industry in which it competes, competitors, and products and/or services provided.
Proficient - Provides an overview of the chosen company, including the industry in which competes, competitors, and of the products and/or services provided. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Provides a limited overview of the chosen company, including the industry in which it competes, some of the competitors, and some of the products and/or services provided. Several relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Provides an incomplete overview of the chosen company. Most of the required components (industry, competitors and products/services) are missing.
Non-Performance - The overview of the chosen company is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Horizontal Analysis of the Income Statement and Balance Sheet
Total: 7.00
Distinguished - Creates a thorough and accurate horizontal analysis of the income statement and balance sheet. Discusses, in detail, the importance and meaning of a horizontal analysis, and comprehensively discusses the positive and negative trends for the company chosen.
Proficient - Creates a thorough horizontal analysis of the income statement and balance sheet. Discusses the importance and meaning of a horizontal analysis and the positive and negative trends for the company chosen. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Creates a limited horizontal analysis of the income statement and balance sheet. Minimally discusses the importance and meaning of a horizontal analysis and the positive and negative trends for the company chosen. Several relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to create a horizontal analysis of the income statement and balance sheet; however, the importance and meaning of a horizontal analysis and/or the positive and negative trends for the chosen company are not sufficiently discussed. Many significant details are missing.
Non-Pe.
ACC205.W5A2.03.2013DescriptionTotal Possible Score 29.00.docx
This document outlines the grading criteria for an ACC205 assignment with a total possible score of 29 points. It describes the requirements for organizing an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion (2 points). It also provides grading criteria for selecting and providing an overview of a company (4 points), completing a horizontal analysis of financial statements (7 points), performing a ratio analysis (6 points), discussing the company's strengths/weaknesses and making an investment recommendation (4 points), using evidence and sources (2 points), completing calculations correctly (1 point), applying quantitative analysis (1 point), controlling syntax and mechanics (0.75 points), using APA formatting (0.75 points), meeting page requirements (0.75 points), and using required
Ashford 3 - Week 2 - AssignmentGlobal Supply Chain Management Qu.docx
Ashford 3: - Week 2 - Assignment
Global Supply Chain Management: Quality Strategy
This assignment is based on a case study that is in Ashford University’s library. Please read Soltani, Azadegan, Liao, and Phillips (2011) which may be found in the Ashford University library (EBSCO database). You are the senior executive in charge of supply chain management for the focal firm or buyer in the United States. M-case and H-case are two important suppliers for your firm. The CEO of the focal firm wants action. The CEO has asked you to respond to the following statements.
Examine the problems and causes that may contribute to low quality throughout the supply chain. Soltani, et al. (2011) recommended that the leadership in the focal firm or buyer select good partners, ensure cooperation, and motivate loyalty to the buyer.
Describe how you would implement the recommendations developed in the case study.
Propose changes to the supplier contract in order for the supply chain to be successful.
Submit your three to four-page paper (not including the title and reference pages) written according to APA style as shown in the approved style guide. The CEO has also asked you to include two scholarly sources in addition to the textbook to support your answers.
Carefully review the
Grading Rubric
for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Description
:
Total Possible Score
: 9.00
Examines the Problems and Causes That Contribute to Low Quality Throughout the Supply Chain
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively examines the problems and causes that contribute to low quality throughout the supply chain.
Proficient - Examines the problems and causes that contribute to low quality throughout the supply chain. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially examines the problems and the causes that contribute to low quality throughout the supply chain. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to examine the problems and causes that contribute to low quality throughout the supply chain; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The examination of the problems and causes that contribute to low quality is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes How to Implement the Recommendations Developed in the Case Study
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly describes how to implement the recommendations developed in the case study.
Proficient - Describes how to implement the recommendations developed in the case study. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Vaguely describes how to implement the recommendations developed in the case study. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe how to implement the recommendations developed in the case study; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The description of how to implement the recommendations is either nonexistent or lacks the compo.
No. of Failures Frequency.docx
The document appears to be a table with two columns: "No. of Failures" and "Frequency". It seems to list the number of failures of something alongside their corresponding frequencies, but without more context or data in the table itself, it is difficult to determine what specifically is being counted or measured.
Nonclassified DataIn order to maintain transparency and et.docx
Nonclassified Data
In order to maintain transparency and ethical standards of research, researchers may file a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to obtain all nonclassified data on a subject. Why is this legislation important? Do you think it is working? Why or why not.
Crime Mapping
Crime mapping has been used for
intelligence-led policing
: using data, analysis, and criminal theory to guide police allocation and decision making. Give some examples of ways this is used in your community. Explain if it is working. What are some other ways that you think it should be used in your Community? Give examples and how it would be effective in policing.
Importance of Reviewing Communications
Describe a situation when you may have sent something electronically (email) or turned something in when the lack of review or proofreading was brought to your attention by yourself or others. Discuss any repercussions you faced due to the communication not being reviewed. Explain the importance of reviewing any form of communication prior to disseminating it.
Who Reviews Your Work?
In our everyday life (school, work, or home) we use some form of communication. Who reviews your communication before it is sent, or do you review the communication of others and your own? Describe how you would ensure the communication is “good to go” or ready to disseminate to others.
.
No plaigarism!!! Due Saturday @ 12pm!Example included and worksh.docx
No plaigarism!!! Due Saturday @ 12pm!
Example included and worksheet attached.
Use the
Source Evaluation Worksheet
to submit an annotated bibliography of 5 sources that you intend to use in your paper. Prepare a citation, annotation, and evaluation for each source.
You may collect the worksheets together as one document or you may submit a separate worksheet for each source.
.
Not all EBP projects result in statistically significant results. De.docx
Not all EBP projects result in statistically significant results. Define clinical significance, and explain the difference between clinical and statistical significance. How can you use clinical significance to support positive outcomes in your project?
the project topic is after discharge follow up
.
Nonprofit v Criminal JusticeCriminal justice organizations and.docx
Nonprofit v Criminal Justice
Criminal justice organizations and nonprofit organizations have a lot of factors and/or characteristics that are similar as well as different. These types of organizations are out there for members of society to help those who are in need as well as gain that experience necessary to fulfill that spot they need within themselves and their life.
To start off, “nonprofit organizations occupy a unique third sector with diverse resource dependencies, arising mainly from private donations and labor, but subsidized by government exemption of certain public tax obligations to encourage charitable activity (Oelbrger, 2016)”. With that being said, a non profit organization, such as the Masonic family, which is a very controversial idea, raises money for those charities such as Shriners Hospital as well as military troops who are actively deployed. Not only this, but they also award their members with scholarships for doing good deeds around their community. I know this personally as my dad is an active Mason.
Criminal justice organizations have many goals as well. Their goals consist of helping those around their community and the country. One of the goals mentioned by the Department of Justice (2018) is to “prevent Crime, Protect the Rights of the American People, and Enforce Federal Law”. As criminal justice employees, they are putting their life on the line whereas daily to help serve their people. Whereas, nonprofit organizations are helping those in their community by serving them with needs that they have, that do not require putting their life on the line.
Both organizations however, are doing what they need to do to help support those around their community. They are both helping their community and those in need when it is needed. Between protection, or fundraisers, or support financially, these organizations do what they have to do to ensure that they are getting their name out there in a positive manner, of course.
.
Noah DeWaalTuesday16 Jun at 1538Manage discussion entryFou.docx
Noah DeWaal
Tuesday16 Jun at 15:38
Manage discussion entry
"Four Horsemen" describes the ways in which our world is slowly folding on itself. It categorizes the four horsemen as a wrongful banking system, escalating violence, an abundance of poverty, and deletion of the world's resources. All these topics are the signs that we have truly doomed ourselves as a nation and as a planet. The underlying kingpin here is money. Everyone, including the government, lives, and works to earn and spend money. There are a variety of different paths to obtain that currency and the banks are at the heart, banks that create this money out of thin air. The film starts by speaking of empires and power. Nations want to be in positions to be on top as a means of security and credibility. Top nations control our world and those who are not, strive to become one. From historic times to now, people and groups want to become the most powerful, and when they do, they obtain all the resources they can do benefit their empires and the leaders become wealthy and untouchable. There is usually one common factor within one's rise to power, and that is money. It earns resources and credibility which makes others become submissive to you. We are supposed to be living within a free market system where everyone has a fair piece of the pie, but that is rarely true today. The way the banks function and government spending only amasses debt that will in turn be paid by the American people. Some of these people live in poverty, meaning they cannot even live anymore. People are expected to pay more for items as the price level rises while many incomes are not following suit. This system leaves those who are poor behind making it nearly impossible for them to catch up. As stated before, government spending can leave a budget deficit that needs to be repaid. Most of these expenditures, however, are on war and violence. International affairs, terrorism, and national crime are all credible threats, and a lot of money goes into limiting it. The resources used to support these organization makes them more powerful and it has transitioned peacekeeping into utter force and violence. Here at home and abroad, war rages daily. From small to large scale conflict is being solved in horrific ways and many innocent people are dying along the way. At the root of all of it, is money and power. A lot of this is also politically inclined. We live in a society in which people are paid just to influence politicians to pass acts that will in turn create more money for people who already have a lot of it. Wealth drives our nation, without it, one is just swept under the carpet. People have worked way too hard to obtain wealth while those in control can create it like none other. This exponential growth has depleted Earth's resources and we are running out fast. With no resources, what is there to gain anymore. The Four Horsemen are the warning signs that our systems are heavily flawed and need to be chan.
No Plagiarism4-6 slides (excluding Title and Reference slides).docx
No Plagiarism
4-6 slides (excluding Title and Reference slides) with notes that are a minimum of 150 words per slide.
Leaders face many hurdles when leading in multiple countries. There are several examples of disastrous public relations fallout that have occurred when companies have outsourced work to other nations. When determining where to move offshore as a company, the leaders of the organization must make several decisions.
Using course theories and current multinational organizations that have locations in several countries, convey your own thoughts on the subject and address the following:
What leadership considerations must an organization weigh in selecting another country to open a location such as a manufacturing plant?
How might leaders need to change leadership styles to manage multinational locations?
What public relations issues might arise from such a decision?
How would you recommend such a company to demonstrate their social responsibility to their headquarters country as well as any offshore locations?
.
North American Philosophical Publications Prejudice i.docx
North American Philosophical Publications
Prejudice in Jest: When Racial and Gender Humor Harms
Author(s): David Benatar
Source: Public Affairs Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Apr., 1999), pp. 191-203
Published by: University of Illinois Press on behalf of North American Philosophical
Publications
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40441225
Accessed: 18-05-2017 00:16 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact [email protected]
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
University of Illinois Press, North American Philosophical Publications are collaborating
with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Public Affairs Quarterly
This content downloaded from 132.174.250.5 on Thu, 18 May 2017 00:16:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Public Affairs Quarterly
Volume 13, Number 2, April 1999
PREJUDICE IN JEST: WHEN RACIAL AND
GENDER HUMOR HARMS
David Benatar
central questions in the sparse literature on the ethics of humor
are: 1) What makes a piece of humor racist or sexist? 2) Are jokes
that embody negative racial and gender stereotypes necessarily racist
and sexist? Because these issues have tended to be discussed separately
it has not been noted that some answers to the first question render the
second question moot. My answer to the first question does not have this
effect. It will draw on an account of humor ethics that I provide and
defend against rival views of racist (and sexist) humor. I shall then
proceed to answering the second question.
An Account of Humor Ethics
How can humor be immoral? Briefly, the answer is that it is immoral
where it is intended to harm people or where there are good grounds for
expecting it to harm people, and where the harm in question is wrong-
fully inflicted. Following Joel Feinberg, I understand harm in terms of
negative effects on people's interests. However, my understanding of
harm is, in two ways, broader than the one for which he opts in his work
about the moral limits of the criminal law.1 Firstly, because in the cur-
rent context I have a more expansive interpretation of what interests
are, my understanding of harm includes what he calls hurts, offenses
and other disliked states which are insufficiently severe to warrant be-
ing termed harms for his purposes. Because I am concerned with the
morality of humor rather than with the moral limits of legally restrict-
ing it, the inclusion of less severe though nonetheless disliked states is
more appropriate. Secondly, for Professor Feinberg, a harm is some-
thing that is wrongfully inflicted. That definition is th.
Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) are essential as they fulfill .docx
Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) are essential as they fulfill a purpose that is traditionally addressed by a government (Balteanu & Marcu, 2014). In order for an NGO to be impactful and serve its purpose, it will require support and involvement from those it has been organized to help, as well as maintain financial and management autonomy, devoid of the governmental influence (Johnson & Stoskopf, 2010). Political and social instability has made it difficult for NGO's to fulfill their purpose to meet the needs of the communities they have pin pointed as their focus (Balteanu & Marcu). During unrest experienced by many countries, residents who need shelter, food, and medical care, benefit from what NGO's to provide (Balteanu & Marcu). Without the government, military, or religious backing of the NGO's purpose, the NGO will not be able to fulfill it's intent (Balteanu & Marcu).
Resident of unstable regions through out the world, are without food, shelter, and medical care due to the preoccupation with control, whether through the government, military, or religious factions. The unstable governments within these regions are either unwilling or unable to care for the needs of their citizens or have taken away their ability to care for themselves. NGO's have the ability to provide for the needs of the people and help them sustain, if allowed.
In general, what is the impact of political and social instability on non-government organizations?
.
Nonverbal CommunicationCOLLAPSEDescribe a scenario in which a .docx
This document discusses nonverbal communication and how it can differ from verbal communication. It prompts the reader to describe a scenario where what someone says verbally differs from their nonverbal cues, such as voice, volume, pitch, rate, pauses, variety, pronunciation, articulation, and dialect. The document also provides instructions for responding to peers in an online forum, including reflecting on concepts, providing an example, stating a takeaway, and properly citing sources in discussions that are at least 250 words.
No plagiarism Research paper should contains following content.docx
No plagiarism
Research paper should contains following content
1) Abstract - Summarize the major elements of the paper
2) Introduction- provide context and rationale for the study
3)Materials- Describe the experimental design so it is reproducible
4) Methods -Describe the experimental procedures
5) Results-summarize the findings without interpretation
6)Discussion- interpret the findings of the study
7)Summary- summarize the findings
8)Acknowledge- give credits to those
9) References- list all scientific papers books and website that you cited
Paper should be in API Style
Requirements: 20 pages
.
More Related Content
Similar to MGT460.W3A1.02.2015Description .docx
Strategic Planning ProcessIn a four- to five-page paper (exc.docx
Strategic Planning Process
In a four- to five-page paper (excluding the title and references pages), discuss the strategic planning process. In your paper:
Explain the basic steps in the planning process.
Describe the steps in the decision-making process, and predict how the personal attributes of the manager influence decision making.
Predict how the steps of the strategic planning process and the environmental factors that influence decision making impact the quality-productivity-profitability link.
Your paper must include in-text citations and references from at least three scholarly sources, in addition to the text, and be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the
Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
.
Description
:
Total Possible Score
: 7.00
Explains the Basic Steps in the Planning Process
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively explains the basic steps in the planning process. The explanation includes supportive scholarly sources and concepts from the text.
Proficient - Explains the basic steps in the planning process. The explanation includes supportive scholarly sources and concepts from the text but is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Partially explains the basic steps in the planning process. The explanation includes some supportive scholarly sources and concepts from the text, but is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the basic steps in the planning process; however, the explanation does not include supportive scholarly sources and concepts from the text and/or is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The explanation of the basic steps in the planning process is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describing the Steps in the Decision-Making Process and Predicts how the Personal Attributes of the Manager Influence Decision Making
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively describes the steps in the decision-making process and predicts how the personal attributes of the manager influence decision making. The description includes supportive scholarly sources and concepts from the text.
Proficient - Describes the steps in the decision-making process and predicts how the personal attributes of the manager influence decision making. The description includes supportive scholarly sources and concepts from the text. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Partially describes the steps in the decision-making process and somewhat predicts how the personal attributes of the manager influence decision making. The description includes some supportive scholarly sources and concepts from the text. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the steps in the decision-making process and predict how the personal attributes of the manager influence decision making; however, the description does not include supportive scholarly sources and concep ...
Contemporary LeadershipWrite a three page paper (not including t
Contemporary Leadership
Write a three page paper (not including the title and reference pages) about a contemporary leadership situation that is familiar to you. Your paper needs to:
Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Identify the development level and style demonstrated in the situation.
Support your position with specific examples.
Explain whether the action taken was appropriate and effective.
Determine and discuss if the situational leadership approach would be useful in understanding the leadership applied to the situation.
In addition to the requirements above, your paper:
Must be double-spaced and 12 point font
Must be formatted according to APA style
Must include an introductory paragraph with a thesis statement
Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph
Must reference at least two scholarly resources
Must include a reference page written in APA format
Rubric
Identify the Development Level and Leadership Style
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly and comprehensively identifies the development level and leadership style demonstrated in the situation. Clearly describes the leadership style, supported by relevant examples.
Proficient - Identifies the development level and leadership style demonstrated in the situation. The discussion provides an example, but is missing one or more minor details.
Basic - Briefly describes the development level and leadership style demonstrated in the situation. The discussion lacks examples and detail.
Below Expectations - The discussion does not identify the development level and style demonstrated in the situation. The position is not supported by specific examples.
Non-Performance - The discussion of development level and style demonstrated is non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Appropriate and Effective Action
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Provides a comprehensive explanation of whether the correct action was taken. The response clearly addresses whether the action was appropriate and effective.
Proficient - Provides an explanation of whether the action taken was correct. Limited discussion on whether the action was appropriate and effective.
Basic - Provides a limited explanation of whether the action taken was correct. The response does not include rationale of why the action was appropriate and how it was effective.
Below Expectations - Provides a response that does not clearly explain whether the action taken was correct, appropriate, or effective. The response is vague and lacks support.
Non-Performance - The discussion of the action taken is non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
The Situational Leadership Approach
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively discusses the situational leadership approach, and provides detailed information on how the approa ...
SOC402.W5A1.07.2015Description .docx
SOC402.W5A1.07.2015
Description:
Total Possible Score: 25.00
Discusses the Chosen Issue from Both the Workplace and Societal Viewpoints,
Including the Positive and Negative Aspects of the Issue in Relation to the
Workplace, Society, and Workers, Especially the Unique Worker Groups who May be
Most Affected
Total: 6.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively discusses the chosen issue from both the
workplace and societal viewpoints, including the positive and negative aspects
of the issue in relation to the workplace, society, and workers, especially the
unique worker groups who may be most affected.
Proficient - Discusses the chosen issue from both the workplace and societal
viewpoints, including the positive and negative aspects of the issue in relation
to the workplace, society, and workers, especially the unique worker groups who
may be most affected. The discussion is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Minimally discusses the chosen issue from both the workplace and
societal viewpoints, including the positive and negative aspects of the issue in
relation to the workplace, society, and workers, especially the unique worker
groups who may be most affected. The discussion is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss the chosen issue from both the
workplace and societal viewpoints, including the positive and negative aspects
of the issue in relation to the workplace, society, and workers, especially the
unique worker groups who may be most affected; however the discussion is
significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The discussion of the chosen issue from both the workplace and
societal viewpoints, including the positive and negative aspects of the issue in
relation to the workplace, society, and workers, especially the unique worker
groups who may be most affected is either nonexistent or lacks the components
described in the assignment instructions.
Analyzes how the Chosen Issue could be Positively Supported using Various Social
Controls
Total: 7.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively analyzes how the chosen issue could be
positively supported using various social controls.
Proficient - Analyzes how the chosen issue could be positively supported using
various social controls. The analysis is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Minimally analyzes how the chosen issue could be positively supported
using various social controls. The analysis is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to analyze how the chosen issue could be
positively supported using various social controls; however, the analysis is
significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The analysis of how the chosen issue could be positively
supported using various social controls are either nonexistent or lacks the
components described in the assignment instructions.
Recommends Interventions in these Areas as well as the P ...
Communications Skill AssessmentMost of us have situations in whi.docx
Communications Skill Assessment
Most of us have situations in which we find it difficult to communicate. Improving your written communication skills and being comfortable speaking to people are extremely important. Develop a two- to three-page APA-formatted paper in which you analyze your personal communication skills. Be sure to address the following:
Describe the assessment you used to analyze your skills.
Discuss your communication gaps.
Describe any additional training you need in specific areas of communication.
Analyze how you can improve your current communication skills to prepare you for advancement in your profession.
Your paper must be two to three pages (not including title and reference pages) and must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide. You must cite three to four scholarly sources in addition to the textbook
Carefully review the
Grading Rubric
for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Description
:
Total Possible Score
: 8.00
Describes the Assessment
Total: 1.50
Distinguished - Comprehensively describes the assessment used to analyze personal communication skills.
Proficient - Describes the assessment used to analyze personal communication skills. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Partially describes the assessment used to analyze personal communication skills. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the assessment used to analyze personal communication skills; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The description of the assessment used is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Discusses Communication Gaps
Total: 1.50
Distinguished - Thoroughly discusses personal communication gaps.
Proficient - Discusses personal communication gaps. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Briefly discusses personal communication gaps. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss personal communication gaps; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The discussion of communication gaps is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes Additional Training Needed in Specific Areas of Communication
Total: 1.50
Distinguished - Fully describes additional training needed in specific areas of communication.
Proficient - Describes additional training needed in specific areas of communication. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Partially describes additional training needed in specific areas of communication. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe additional training needed in specific areas of communication; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The description of additional training needed in specific areas of communication is either nonexistent or lacks the comp ...
MGT450.W5A1.06.2014Description .docx
MGT450.W5A1.06.2014
Description:
Total Possible Score: 19.00
Selects an Organization and Describes Its History, Products, and Major
Competitors
Total: 2.50
Distinguished - Selects an organization and thoroughly describes its history,
products, and major competitors.
Proficient - Selects an organization and describes its history, products, and
major competitors. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Selects an organization and partially describes its history, products,
and major competitors. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Selects an organization and attempts to describe its
history, products, and major competitors; however, significant details are
missing.
Non-Performance - The description of the selected organization’s history,
products, and major competitors is either nonexistent or lacks the components
described in the assignment instructions.
Explains the Current Situation of the Organization in the Market
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly explains the current situation of the organization in
the market.
Proficient - Explains the current situation of the organization in the market.
Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially explains the current situation of the organization in the
market. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the current situation of the
organization in the market; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The explanation of the current situation of the organization
in the market is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
assignment instructions.
Develops a SWOT Analysis to Determine Areas That Offer Opportunities for Change
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Develops a comprehensive SWOT analysis to determine areas that
offer opportunities for change. The analysis is thoroughly supported with
scholarly sources.
Proficient - Develops a SWOT analysis to determine areas that offer
opportunities for change. The analysis is supported with scholarly sources but
is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Develops a limited SWOT analysis to determine areas that offer
opportunities for change. The analysis is minimally supported with scholarly
sources and/or is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to develop a SWOT analysis to determine areas that
offer opportunities for change; however, the analysis is not supported with
scholarly sources and/or is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The development of SWOT analysis to determine areas that offer
opportunities for change is either nonexistent or lacks the components described
in the assignment instructions.
Chooses at Least Three Areas From the SWOT Analysis and Explains Why the Chosen
Areas are Essential to the Strategic Plan
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Chooses at least three areas from th ...
DescriptionTotal Possible Score 20.00ePortfolio - Compon.docx
Description:
Total Possible Score: 20.00
ePortfolio - Components
Total: 5.00
Distinguished - Includes at least one artifact that fully demonstrates mastery of each of the nine MAED Program Learning Outcomes.
Proficient - Includes one artifact that demonstrates mastery of the nine MAED Program Learning Outcomes.
Basic - Includes one artifact that somewhat demonstrates mastery of at least eight MAED Program Learning Outcomes.
Below Expectations - Includes one artifact that minimally demonstrates mastery of each of fewer than seven MAED Program Learning Outcomes.
Non-Performance - The artifact is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
ePortfolio - Design
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Effectively designs an ePortfolio that is professional in appearance, has visual appeal, and exemplifies effective and ethical uses of technology.
Proficient - Adequately designs an ePortfolio that is professional in appearance, has visual appeal, and exemplifies effective and ethical uses of technology. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Minimally designs an ePortfolio that is somewhat professional in appearance, has limited visual appeal, and vaguely exemplifies effective and ethical uses of technology. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Ineffectively designs an ePortfolio that is not professional in appearance, does not have visual appeal, and/or does not exemplify effective and ethical uses of technology. Significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The design of the ePortfolio is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Narrative - Ranking
Total: 5.00
Distinguished - Effectively ranks and thoroughly discusses the importance and use of each Program Learning Outcome in a work setting.
Proficient - Adequately ranks and discusses the importance and use of each Program Learning Outcome in a work setting. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Minimally ranks and partially discusses the importance and use of each Program Learning Outcome in a work setting. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Ineffectively ranks and attempts to discuss the importance and use of each Program Learning Outcome in a work setting. Significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The ranking and discussion of the importance and use of each Program Learning Outcome are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Narrative - Challenges/
Solution
s
Total: 5.00
Distinguished - Effectively discusses the design and development challenges experienced while creating the ePortfolio and explains how challenges were overcome.
Proficient - Adequately discusses the design and development challenges experienced while creating the ePortfolio and explains how challenges were overcome. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Minimally discusses the design and development challenges experienced while creating the ePortfolio and explains how chal.
Each week’s assignment in this class will lead up to the Research .docx
Each week’s assignment in this class will lead up to the Research Project in Week Six. Before you work on Week One’s assignment, preview the Research Project in Week Six so you understand the final outcome of this project. Also read this week’s lecture. If you are having a difficult time choosing your topic, please contact your instructor for assistance before the assignment is due.
In a one-to two-page paper (not including the title and reference pages), provide
Background information about your Research Project (i.e., why have you decided to do this research?).
The management dilemma. (i.e., what is the problem you are trying to solve with this research?)
The research question and a hypothesis.
A brief summary of previously conducted scholarly research on similar topics that you can find through the Ashford University Library.
Your paper must be formatted according to APA style
Provides Background Information About the Research Project
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Provides comprehensive background information about the Research Project.
Proficient - Provides background information about the Research Project. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Provides limited background information about the Research Project. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to provide background information about the Research Project; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The background information provided about the Research Project is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes the Management Dilemma
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly describes the management dilemma.
Proficient - Describes the management dilemma. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Somewhat describes the management dilemma. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describes the management dilemma; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The description of the management dilemma is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Develops a Research Question and Hypothesis
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Develops an accurate and detailed research question and hypothesis.
Proficient - Develops an accurate research question and hypothesis. The research question or hypothesis is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Partially develops a research question and hypothesis. The research question and hypothesis is inaccurate and/or underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to develop a research question and hypothesis; however, the research question and hypothesis are inaccurate and/or significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The research question and hypothesis developed are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Provides a Summary of Previously Conducted Scholarly Research on Similar Topics
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Provides a detailed .
Explain How these Aspects Work Together to Perform the Primary Fun.docx
Explain How these Aspects Work Together to Perform the Primary Function of HRM
Total: 5.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly and methodically explains how each of the aspects work together to perform the primary function of HRM. The explanation is professional and provides detailed examples that clearly demonstrate that new learning has occurred.
Proficient - Explains how each of the aspects work together to perform the primary function of HRM. The explanation is well constructed and provides several examples that demonstrate that new learning has occurred; however, a few minor details are missing.
Basic - Briefly explains how each of the aspects work together to perform the primary function of HRM. The explanation is somewhat complete, but provides few examples that demonstrate that new learning has occurred. Several key details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain how each of the aspects work together to perform the primary function of HRM, but the explanation is too underdeveloped to be considered complete and does not demonstrate that new learning has occurred.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or fails to explain how these aspects work together to perform the primary function of HRM.
Are Any Aspects More Important than the Others? Why or Why Not?
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively explains whether or not any aspects are more important than others, including a detailed reasoning as to why. The explanation is professional and provides detailed examples that clearly demonstrate that new learning has occurred.
Proficient - Explains whether or not any aspects are more important than others, including reasoning as to why. The explanation well-written and provides a few examples that demonstrate that new learning has occurred. One or more minor details may be missing.
Basic - Briefly explains whether or not any aspects are more important than others, including a short reasoning as to why. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped and somewhat demonstrates that new learning has occurred. Several key details may be missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain whether or not any aspects are more important than others, but the explanation is too underdeveloped to be considered complete and does not demonstrate that new learning has occurred.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or fails to determine whether or not and aspects are more important than others.
Optimizing the HRM Role for Shaping Organizational and Employee Behavior
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Provides a comprehensive and thorough discussion addressing how the HRM role can be optimized for shaping organizational and employee behavior. The discussion is thought-provoking, creative, and utilizes vocabulary and concepts from the text.
Proficient - Provides a discussion addressing how the HRM role can be optimized for shaping organizational and employee behavior. The discussion is mostly complete and attempts to utilize voca ...
ACC205.W5A2.03.2013Description Total Possible Score 29.00O.docx
ACC205.W5A2.03.2013
Description:
Total Possible Score: 29.00
Organization: Introduction, Thesis Statement, and Conclusion
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Paper is logically organized with a well-written introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion.
Proficient - Paper is logically organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. One of these requires improvement.
Basic - Paper is organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. One or more of the introduction, thesis statement, and/or conclusion require improvement.
Below Expectations - Paper is loosely organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. The introduction, thesis statement, and/or conclusion require much improvement.
Non-Performance - The introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Selects and Provides an Overview of the Chosen Company
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Provides a thorough overview of the chosen company, including the industry in which it competes, competitors, and products and/or services provided.
Proficient - Provides an overview of the chosen company, including the industry in which competes, competitors, and of the products and/or services provided. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Provides a limited overview of the chosen company, including the industry in which it competes, some of the competitors, and some of the products and/or services provided. Several relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Provides an incomplete overview of the chosen company. Most of the required components (industry, competitors and products/services) are missing.
Non-Performance - The overview of the chosen company is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Horizontal Analysis of the Income Statement and Balance Sheet
Total: 7.00
Distinguished - Creates a thorough and accurate horizontal analysis of the income statement and balance sheet. Discusses, in detail, the importance and meaning of a horizontal analysis, and comprehensively discusses the positive and negative trends for the company chosen.
Proficient - Creates a thorough horizontal analysis of the income statement and balance sheet. Discusses the importance and meaning of a horizontal analysis and the positive and negative trends for the company chosen. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Creates a limited horizontal analysis of the income statement and balance sheet. Minimally discusses the importance and meaning of a horizontal analysis and the positive and negative trends for the company chosen. Several relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to create a horizontal analysis of the income statement and balance sheet; however, the importance and meaning of a horizontal analysis and/or the positive and negative trends for the chosen company are not sufficiently discussed. Many significant details are missing.
Non-Pe.
ACC205.W5A2.03.2013DescriptionTotal Possible Score 29.00.docx
This document outlines the grading criteria for an ACC205 assignment with a total possible score of 29 points. It describes the requirements for organizing an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion (2 points). It also provides grading criteria for selecting and providing an overview of a company (4 points), completing a horizontal analysis of financial statements (7 points), performing a ratio analysis (6 points), discussing the company's strengths/weaknesses and making an investment recommendation (4 points), using evidence and sources (2 points), completing calculations correctly (1 point), applying quantitative analysis (1 point), controlling syntax and mechanics (0.75 points), using APA formatting (0.75 points), meeting page requirements (0.75 points), and using required
Ashford 3 - Week 2 - AssignmentGlobal Supply Chain Management Qu.docx
Ashford 3: - Week 2 - Assignment
Global Supply Chain Management: Quality Strategy
This assignment is based on a case study that is in Ashford University’s library. Please read Soltani, Azadegan, Liao, and Phillips (2011) which may be found in the Ashford University library (EBSCO database). You are the senior executive in charge of supply chain management for the focal firm or buyer in the United States. M-case and H-case are two important suppliers for your firm. The CEO of the focal firm wants action. The CEO has asked you to respond to the following statements.
Examine the problems and causes that may contribute to low quality throughout the supply chain. Soltani, et al. (2011) recommended that the leadership in the focal firm or buyer select good partners, ensure cooperation, and motivate loyalty to the buyer.
Describe how you would implement the recommendations developed in the case study.
Propose changes to the supplier contract in order for the supply chain to be successful.
Submit your three to four-page paper (not including the title and reference pages) written according to APA style as shown in the approved style guide. The CEO has also asked you to include two scholarly sources in addition to the textbook to support your answers.
Carefully review the
Grading Rubric
for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Description
:
Total Possible Score
: 9.00
Examines the Problems and Causes That Contribute to Low Quality Throughout the Supply Chain
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively examines the problems and causes that contribute to low quality throughout the supply chain.
Proficient - Examines the problems and causes that contribute to low quality throughout the supply chain. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially examines the problems and the causes that contribute to low quality throughout the supply chain. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to examine the problems and causes that contribute to low quality throughout the supply chain; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The examination of the problems and causes that contribute to low quality is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes How to Implement the Recommendations Developed in the Case Study
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly describes how to implement the recommendations developed in the case study.
Proficient - Describes how to implement the recommendations developed in the case study. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Vaguely describes how to implement the recommendations developed in the case study. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe how to implement the recommendations developed in the case study; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The description of how to implement the recommendations is either nonexistent or lacks the compo.
Similar to MGT460.W3A1.02.2015Description .docx (11)
Strategic Planning ProcessIn a four- to five-page paper (exc.docx
Strategic Planning ProcessIn a four- to five-page paper (exc.docx
Contemporary LeadershipWrite a three page paper (not including t
Contemporary LeadershipWrite a three page paper (not including t
Communications Skill AssessmentMost of us have situations in whi.docx
Communications Skill AssessmentMost of us have situations in whi.docx
DescriptionTotal Possible Score 20.00ePortfolio - Compon.docx
DescriptionTotal Possible Score 20.00ePortfolio - Compon.docx
Each week’s assignment in this class will lead up to the Research .docx
Each week’s assignment in this class will lead up to the Research .docx
Explain How these Aspects Work Together to Perform the Primary Fun.docx
Explain How these Aspects Work Together to Perform the Primary Fun.docx
ACC205.W5A2.03.2013Description Total Possible Score 29.00O.docx
ACC205.W5A2.03.2013Description Total Possible Score 29.00O.docx
ACC205.W5A2.03.2013DescriptionTotal Possible Score 29.00.docx
ACC205.W5A2.03.2013DescriptionTotal Possible Score 29.00.docx
Ashford 3 - Week 2 - AssignmentGlobal Supply Chain Management Qu.docx
Ashford 3 - Week 2 - AssignmentGlobal Supply Chain Management Qu.docx
More from hallettfaustina
No. of Failures Frequency.docx
The document appears to be a table with two columns: "No. of Failures" and "Frequency". It seems to list the number of failures of something alongside their corresponding frequencies, but without more context or data in the table itself, it is difficult to determine what specifically is being counted or measured.
Nonclassified DataIn order to maintain transparency and et.docx
Nonclassified Data
In order to maintain transparency and ethical standards of research, researchers may file a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to obtain all nonclassified data on a subject. Why is this legislation important? Do you think it is working? Why or why not.
Crime Mapping
Crime mapping has been used for
intelligence-led policing
: using data, analysis, and criminal theory to guide police allocation and decision making. Give some examples of ways this is used in your community. Explain if it is working. What are some other ways that you think it should be used in your Community? Give examples and how it would be effective in policing.
Importance of Reviewing Communications
Describe a situation when you may have sent something electronically (email) or turned something in when the lack of review or proofreading was brought to your attention by yourself or others. Discuss any repercussions you faced due to the communication not being reviewed. Explain the importance of reviewing any form of communication prior to disseminating it.
Who Reviews Your Work?
In our everyday life (school, work, or home) we use some form of communication. Who reviews your communication before it is sent, or do you review the communication of others and your own? Describe how you would ensure the communication is “good to go” or ready to disseminate to others.
.
No plaigarism!!! Due Saturday @ 12pm!Example included and worksh.docx
No plaigarism!!! Due Saturday @ 12pm!
Example included and worksheet attached.
Use the
Source Evaluation Worksheet
to submit an annotated bibliography of 5 sources that you intend to use in your paper. Prepare a citation, annotation, and evaluation for each source.
You may collect the worksheets together as one document or you may submit a separate worksheet for each source.
.
Not all EBP projects result in statistically significant results. De.docx
Not all EBP projects result in statistically significant results. Define clinical significance, and explain the difference between clinical and statistical significance. How can you use clinical significance to support positive outcomes in your project?
the project topic is after discharge follow up
.
Nonprofit v Criminal JusticeCriminal justice organizations and.docx
Nonprofit v Criminal Justice
Criminal justice organizations and nonprofit organizations have a lot of factors and/or characteristics that are similar as well as different. These types of organizations are out there for members of society to help those who are in need as well as gain that experience necessary to fulfill that spot they need within themselves and their life.
To start off, “nonprofit organizations occupy a unique third sector with diverse resource dependencies, arising mainly from private donations and labor, but subsidized by government exemption of certain public tax obligations to encourage charitable activity (Oelbrger, 2016)”. With that being said, a non profit organization, such as the Masonic family, which is a very controversial idea, raises money for those charities such as Shriners Hospital as well as military troops who are actively deployed. Not only this, but they also award their members with scholarships for doing good deeds around their community. I know this personally as my dad is an active Mason.
Criminal justice organizations have many goals as well. Their goals consist of helping those around their community and the country. One of the goals mentioned by the Department of Justice (2018) is to “prevent Crime, Protect the Rights of the American People, and Enforce Federal Law”. As criminal justice employees, they are putting their life on the line whereas daily to help serve their people. Whereas, nonprofit organizations are helping those in their community by serving them with needs that they have, that do not require putting their life on the line.
Both organizations however, are doing what they need to do to help support those around their community. They are both helping their community and those in need when it is needed. Between protection, or fundraisers, or support financially, these organizations do what they have to do to ensure that they are getting their name out there in a positive manner, of course.
.
Noah DeWaalTuesday16 Jun at 1538Manage discussion entryFou.docx
Noah DeWaal
Tuesday16 Jun at 15:38
Manage discussion entry
"Four Horsemen" describes the ways in which our world is slowly folding on itself. It categorizes the four horsemen as a wrongful banking system, escalating violence, an abundance of poverty, and deletion of the world's resources. All these topics are the signs that we have truly doomed ourselves as a nation and as a planet. The underlying kingpin here is money. Everyone, including the government, lives, and works to earn and spend money. There are a variety of different paths to obtain that currency and the banks are at the heart, banks that create this money out of thin air. The film starts by speaking of empires and power. Nations want to be in positions to be on top as a means of security and credibility. Top nations control our world and those who are not, strive to become one. From historic times to now, people and groups want to become the most powerful, and when they do, they obtain all the resources they can do benefit their empires and the leaders become wealthy and untouchable. There is usually one common factor within one's rise to power, and that is money. It earns resources and credibility which makes others become submissive to you. We are supposed to be living within a free market system where everyone has a fair piece of the pie, but that is rarely true today. The way the banks function and government spending only amasses debt that will in turn be paid by the American people. Some of these people live in poverty, meaning they cannot even live anymore. People are expected to pay more for items as the price level rises while many incomes are not following suit. This system leaves those who are poor behind making it nearly impossible for them to catch up. As stated before, government spending can leave a budget deficit that needs to be repaid. Most of these expenditures, however, are on war and violence. International affairs, terrorism, and national crime are all credible threats, and a lot of money goes into limiting it. The resources used to support these organization makes them more powerful and it has transitioned peacekeeping into utter force and violence. Here at home and abroad, war rages daily. From small to large scale conflict is being solved in horrific ways and many innocent people are dying along the way. At the root of all of it, is money and power. A lot of this is also politically inclined. We live in a society in which people are paid just to influence politicians to pass acts that will in turn create more money for people who already have a lot of it. Wealth drives our nation, without it, one is just swept under the carpet. People have worked way too hard to obtain wealth while those in control can create it like none other. This exponential growth has depleted Earth's resources and we are running out fast. With no resources, what is there to gain anymore. The Four Horsemen are the warning signs that our systems are heavily flawed and need to be chan.
No Plagiarism4-6 slides (excluding Title and Reference slides).docx
No Plagiarism
4-6 slides (excluding Title and Reference slides) with notes that are a minimum of 150 words per slide.
Leaders face many hurdles when leading in multiple countries. There are several examples of disastrous public relations fallout that have occurred when companies have outsourced work to other nations. When determining where to move offshore as a company, the leaders of the organization must make several decisions.
Using course theories and current multinational organizations that have locations in several countries, convey your own thoughts on the subject and address the following:
What leadership considerations must an organization weigh in selecting another country to open a location such as a manufacturing plant?
How might leaders need to change leadership styles to manage multinational locations?
What public relations issues might arise from such a decision?
How would you recommend such a company to demonstrate their social responsibility to their headquarters country as well as any offshore locations?
.
North American Philosophical Publications Prejudice i.docx
North American Philosophical Publications
Prejudice in Jest: When Racial and Gender Humor Harms
Author(s): David Benatar
Source: Public Affairs Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Apr., 1999), pp. 191-203
Published by: University of Illinois Press on behalf of North American Philosophical
Publications
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40441225
Accessed: 18-05-2017 00:16 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact [email protected]
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
University of Illinois Press, North American Philosophical Publications are collaborating
with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Public Affairs Quarterly
This content downloaded from 132.174.250.5 on Thu, 18 May 2017 00:16:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Public Affairs Quarterly
Volume 13, Number 2, April 1999
PREJUDICE IN JEST: WHEN RACIAL AND
GENDER HUMOR HARMS
David Benatar
central questions in the sparse literature on the ethics of humor
are: 1) What makes a piece of humor racist or sexist? 2) Are jokes
that embody negative racial and gender stereotypes necessarily racist
and sexist? Because these issues have tended to be discussed separately
it has not been noted that some answers to the first question render the
second question moot. My answer to the first question does not have this
effect. It will draw on an account of humor ethics that I provide and
defend against rival views of racist (and sexist) humor. I shall then
proceed to answering the second question.
An Account of Humor Ethics
How can humor be immoral? Briefly, the answer is that it is immoral
where it is intended to harm people or where there are good grounds for
expecting it to harm people, and where the harm in question is wrong-
fully inflicted. Following Joel Feinberg, I understand harm in terms of
negative effects on people's interests. However, my understanding of
harm is, in two ways, broader than the one for which he opts in his work
about the moral limits of the criminal law.1 Firstly, because in the cur-
rent context I have a more expansive interpretation of what interests
are, my understanding of harm includes what he calls hurts, offenses
and other disliked states which are insufficiently severe to warrant be-
ing termed harms for his purposes. Because I am concerned with the
morality of humor rather than with the moral limits of legally restrict-
ing it, the inclusion of less severe though nonetheless disliked states is
more appropriate. Secondly, for Professor Feinberg, a harm is some-
thing that is wrongfully inflicted. That definition is th.
Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) are essential as they fulfill .docx
Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) are essential as they fulfill a purpose that is traditionally addressed by a government (Balteanu & Marcu, 2014). In order for an NGO to be impactful and serve its purpose, it will require support and involvement from those it has been organized to help, as well as maintain financial and management autonomy, devoid of the governmental influence (Johnson & Stoskopf, 2010). Political and social instability has made it difficult for NGO's to fulfill their purpose to meet the needs of the communities they have pin pointed as their focus (Balteanu & Marcu). During unrest experienced by many countries, residents who need shelter, food, and medical care, benefit from what NGO's to provide (Balteanu & Marcu). Without the government, military, or religious backing of the NGO's purpose, the NGO will not be able to fulfill it's intent (Balteanu & Marcu).
Resident of unstable regions through out the world, are without food, shelter, and medical care due to the preoccupation with control, whether through the government, military, or religious factions. The unstable governments within these regions are either unwilling or unable to care for the needs of their citizens or have taken away their ability to care for themselves. NGO's have the ability to provide for the needs of the people and help them sustain, if allowed.
In general, what is the impact of political and social instability on non-government organizations?
.
Nonverbal CommunicationCOLLAPSEDescribe a scenario in which a .docx
This document discusses nonverbal communication and how it can differ from verbal communication. It prompts the reader to describe a scenario where what someone says verbally differs from their nonverbal cues, such as voice, volume, pitch, rate, pauses, variety, pronunciation, articulation, and dialect. The document also provides instructions for responding to peers in an online forum, including reflecting on concepts, providing an example, stating a takeaway, and properly citing sources in discussions that are at least 250 words.
No plagiarism Research paper should contains following content.docx
No plagiarism
Research paper should contains following content
1) Abstract - Summarize the major elements of the paper
2) Introduction- provide context and rationale for the study
3)Materials- Describe the experimental design so it is reproducible
4) Methods -Describe the experimental procedures
5) Results-summarize the findings without interpretation
6)Discussion- interpret the findings of the study
7)Summary- summarize the findings
8)Acknowledge- give credits to those
9) References- list all scientific papers books and website that you cited
Paper should be in API Style
Requirements: 20 pages
.
NO PLAGIARISM MEET REQUIREMENTSCOMPLETE BY DEADLINE Wr.docx
Shell Oil operated in Nigeria and faced accusations related to corruption, bribery, involvement in the death of an activist poet, and taking advantage of weak local regulations. The case study prompts the student to answer questions about factors contributing to high corruption in Nigeria, Shell's role in the poet's death and the impact, whether Shell took advantage of weak local oversight, and recommendations for ethical operations in societies with weak institutions. The response must be 650 words excluding the questions, follow APA style formatting, and include 3 scholarly references.
No plagiarism very important In a few short paragraphs, explain .docx
No plagiarism very important
In a few short paragraphs, explain which cloud services you use (Google, Amazon, iCloud, Verizon, Microsoft One, Dropbox, etc) and what type of information you store (docs, photos, music, other files?). How much space do you have and what does this cost per month?
Need in word document with apa format with citations
.
No plagiarism very important Do you feel the benefits of cloud c.docx
No plagiarism very important
Do you feel the benefits of cloud computing are worth the threats and vulnerabilities? Have we arrived at a point where we can trust external agencies to secure our most precious data? Please explain your answer.
Need responses to reply my teamates discusions
.
No plagiarism very important 5-CEHv9 Module 03 Scanning Networ.docx
No plagiarism very important
5-CEHv9 Module 03 Scanning Networks.pdf
Select one network scanning software tool (there is a list in your required reading slides) and explain in detail how it works and how detects network vulnerabilities. Provide the site where you obtained your information and include that in your assignment write-up. (in word document).
Need citations
.
No plagiarism very importantNeed responses to my teamates discus.docx
No plagiarism very important
Need responses to my teamates discussions
question:Social engineering is the art of manipulating people so they give up confidential information. The types of information these criminals are seeking can vary, but when individuals are targeted the criminals are usually trying to trick you into giving them your passwords or bank information, or access your computer to secretly install malicious software - that will give them access to your passwords and bank information as well as giving them control over your computer.
Explain a scenario where you or someone you know may have unknowingly given too much personal information to a stranger. How could this situation been avoided?
Reference Article Link:
https://www.webroot.com/us/en/resources/tips-articles/what-is-social-engineering
.
No More Backstabbing... A Faithful Scheduling Policy for Multi.docx
No More Backstabbing... A Faithful Scheduling Policy for Multithreaded Programs
Kishore Kumar Pusukuri, Rajiv Gupta, Laxmi N. Bhuyan
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
University of California, Riverside
Riverside, USA 92521
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract—Efficient contention management is the key to
achieving scalable performance for multithreaded applications
running on multicore systems. However, contention manage-
ment policies provided by modern operating systems increase
context-switches and lead to performance degradation for
multithreaded applications under high loads. Moreover, this
problem is exacerbated by the interaction between contention
management policies and OS scheduling polices. Time Share
(TS) is the default scheduling policy in a modern OS such as
OpenSolaris and with TS policy, priorities of threads change
very frequently for balancing load and providing fairness in
scheduling. Due to the frequent ping-ponging of priorities,
threads of an application are often preempted by the threads
of the same application. This increases the frequency of
involuntary context-switches as wells as lock-holder thread
preemptions and leads to poor performance. This problem
becomes very serious under high loads.
To alleviate this problem, in this paper, we present a
scheduling policy called Faithful Scheduling (FF), which dra-
matically reduces context-switches as well as lock-holder thread
preemptions. We implemented FF on a 24-core Dell PowerEdge
R905 server running OpenSolaris.2009.06 and evaluated it
using 22 programs including the TATP database application,
SPECjbb2005, programs from PARSEC, SPEC OMP, and
some microbenchmarks. The experimental results show that FF
policy achieves high performance for both lightly and heavily
loaded systems. Moreover it does not require any changes to
the application source code or the OS kernel.
Keywords-Scheduling; priorities; contention; context-
switches
I. INTRODUCTION
The advent of multicore architectures provides an attractive
opportunity for achieving high performance for a wide
variety of multithreaded applications. However, exploiting
the system density, and the parallelism they offer, to improve
performance of multithreaded applications is a challenging
task. This is because multithreaded application performance is
sensitive to the implementations of synchronization primitives
and contention management policies. Therefore the key
to achieving high performance for multithreaded applica-
tions running on multicore systems is to use appropriate
synchronization primitives along with efficient contention
management policies. Contention management policies are
either based on spinning, or blocking, or a combination
of both. Spinning resolves contention by busy waiting,
therefore waiting threads respond to lock handoffs very
quickly. However, spinning threads can wastes CPU resources
and prevent the lock-holder thread from runnin.
No plagiarism very importantThere are many mobile platform vulne.docx
No plagiarism very important
There are many mobile platform vulnerabilities listed in the readings from this week (slides 8, 9, and 10). Which do you feel is the greatest threat to users? Do you agree that people generally are not aware of the threats to their mobile devices?
Need responses to reply my teamattes and need references for all of them
.
No more than 10 slides, including title slide, providing executive s.docx
No more than 10 slides, including title slide, providing executive summary of emergency response plan, actions taken prior to, during and post event.
This presentation is intended for high level executives of the company and should be brief but comprehensive.
See attachment for more information.
.
NO PLAGIARISM !Write 3 pages of descriptive essay about why you .docx
NO PLAGIARISM !
Write 3 pages of descriptive essay about why you should visit and spend time in Denali National Park which is located in Alaska, USA.
Outline
1. Introduction
2. Reason 1 and explain, example
3. Reason 2 and explain, example
4. Reason 3 and explain, example
5. Reason 4 and explain, example
6. Reason 5 and explain, example
7. Conclusion
.
More from hallettfaustina (20)
Nonclassified DataIn order to maintain transparency and et.docx
Nonclassified DataIn order to maintain transparency and et.docx
No plaigarism!!! Due Saturday @ 12pm!Example included and worksh.docx
No plaigarism!!! Due Saturday @ 12pm!Example included and worksh.docx
Not all EBP projects result in statistically significant results. De.docx
Not all EBP projects result in statistically significant results. De.docx
Nonprofit v Criminal JusticeCriminal justice organizations and.docx
Nonprofit v Criminal JusticeCriminal justice organizations and.docx
Noah DeWaalTuesday16 Jun at 1538Manage discussion entryFou.docx
Noah DeWaalTuesday16 Jun at 1538Manage discussion entryFou.docx
No Plagiarism4-6 slides (excluding Title and Reference slides).docx
No Plagiarism4-6 slides (excluding Title and Reference slides).docx
North American Philosophical Publications Prejudice i.docx
North American Philosophical Publications Prejudice i.docx
Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) are essential as they fulfill .docx
Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) are essential as they fulfill .docx
Nonverbal CommunicationCOLLAPSEDescribe a scenario in which a .docx
Nonverbal CommunicationCOLLAPSEDescribe a scenario in which a .docx
No plagiarism Research paper should contains following content.docx
No plagiarism Research paper should contains following content.docx
NO PLAGIARISM MEET REQUIREMENTSCOMPLETE BY DEADLINE Wr.docx
NO PLAGIARISM MEET REQUIREMENTSCOMPLETE BY DEADLINE Wr.docx
No plagiarism very important In a few short paragraphs, explain .docx
No plagiarism very important In a few short paragraphs, explain .docx
No plagiarism very important Do you feel the benefits of cloud c.docx
No plagiarism very important Do you feel the benefits of cloud c.docx
No plagiarism very important 5-CEHv9 Module 03 Scanning Networ.docx
No plagiarism very important 5-CEHv9 Module 03 Scanning Networ.docx
No plagiarism very importantNeed responses to my teamates discus.docx
No plagiarism very importantNeed responses to my teamates discus.docx
No More Backstabbing... A Faithful Scheduling Policy for Multi.docx
No More Backstabbing... A Faithful Scheduling Policy for Multi.docx
No plagiarism very importantThere are many mobile platform vulne.docx
No plagiarism very importantThere are many mobile platform vulne.docx
No more than 10 slides, including title slide, providing executive s.docx
No more than 10 slides, including title slide, providing executive s.docx
NO PLAGIARISM !Write 3 pages of descriptive essay about why you .docx
NO PLAGIARISM !Write 3 pages of descriptive essay about why you .docx
Recently uploaded
The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
PCOS corelations and management through Ayurveda.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
Covered community pharmacy topic of the subject Social and preventive pharmacy for Diploma and Bachelor of pharmacy
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar KanvariaNatural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityAkanksha trivedi rama nursing college kanpur.
Natural birth techniques are various type such as/ water birth , alexender method, hypnosis, bradley method, lamaze method etcDigital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit - NGV Pavilion Concept Design
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
Qualitative research interview training by Professor Katrina Pritchard and Dr Helen Williams
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)Academy of Science of South Africa
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.Recently uploaded (20)
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
MGT460.W3A1.02.2015Description .docx
- 1. MGT460.W3A1.02.2015 Description: Total Possible Score: 10.00 Constructs a Goal-Setting Framework for Chosen Issue #1
- 2. Total: 2.50 Distinguished - Thoroughly constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #1, including a goal statement, strategies, tactics, activities, measures of success, and goal measurements. Provides clear and supported rationale for all aspects of the goal-setting framework. Proficient - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #1, including a goal statement, strategies, tactics, activities, measures of success, and goal measurements. Provides some supported rationale for all aspects of the goal-setting framework.
- 3. Basic - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #1, but the framework may be missing some relevant details. Rationale provided may be somewhat unclear, minimally supported, and/or underdeveloped. Below Expectations - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #1, but the framework may be missing some key elements. Rationale is unclear, unsupported, and/or missing. Non-Performance - The goal-setting framework for chosen issue #1 is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
- 4. Constructs a Goal-Setting Framework for Chosen Issue #2 Total: 2.50 Distinguished - Thoroughly constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #2, including a goal statement, strategies, tactics, activities, measures of success, and goal measurements. Provides clear and supported rationale for all aspects of the goal-setting framework. Proficient - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #2, including a goal statement, strategies, tactics, activities, measures of success, and goal measurements. Provides some rationale for all aspects of the
- 5. goal-setting framework. Basic - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #2, but the framework may be missing some relevant details. Rationale may be somewhat unclear, minimally supported, and/or underdeveloped. Below Expectations - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #2, but the framework may be missing some key elements. Rationale is unclear, unsupported, and/or missing. Non-Performance - The goal-setting framework for chosen issue #2 is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment
- 6. instructions. Constructs a Goal-Setting Framework for Chosen Issue #3 Total: 2.50 Distinguished - Thoroughly constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #3, including a goal statement, strategies, tactics, activities, measures of success, and goal measurements. Provides clear and supported rationale for all aspects of the goal-setting framework. Proficient - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen
- 7. issue #3, including a goal statement, strategies, tactics, activities, measures of success, and goal measurements. Provides some rationale for all aspects of the goal-setting framework. Basic - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #3, but the framework may be missing some relevant details. Rationale may be somewhat unclear, minimally supported, and/or underdeveloped. Below Expectations - Constructs a goal-setting framework for chosen issue #3, but the framework may be missing some key elements. Rationale is unclear, unsupported, and/or missing.
- 8. Non-Performance - The goal-setting framework for chosen issue #3 is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Creative Thinking: Solving Problems Total: 0.25 Distinguished - Develops a logical, consistent plan to solve a problem, identifies consequences of the solution, and can clearly communicate the reason for choosing the solution.
- 9. Proficient - Carefully chooses among alternatives, and develops a logical, consistent approach to problem solving. Basic - Takes into account and eliminates less acceptable approaches to problem solving. Below Expectations - Takes into account a single approach and uses the approach to problem solving. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
- 10. Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing Total: 0.25 Distinguished - Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly. Proficient - Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear
- 11. and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly. Basic - Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident, but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections. Below Expectations - Organization and presentation of content is extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.
- 12. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics Total: 1.00 Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.
- 13. Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand. Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader. Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.
- 14. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. APA Formatting Total: 0.50 Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
- 15. Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. Basic - Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
- 16. Page Requirement Total: 0.25 Distinguished - The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description. Proficient - The paper closely meets the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description. Basic - The paper meets over half of the page requirement stipulated in the
- 17. assignment description. Below Expectations - A fraction of the page requirement is completed. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Resource Requirement Total: 0.25
- 18. Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment. Proficient - Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment. Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
- 19. Below Expectations - Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Powered by var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA- 19803462-1']);
- 20. _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.waypointoutcomes.com']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function () { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })();