Different significances and motives reveal academics' interest in systematic app assessment over mobile applications. 1. Search strategy 2. Information 3. Application 4. Outcome Learn More : https://bit.ly/3BUIJ2S Reference: https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/

1. Motivations,
recommendations, and
features of medical app
evaluation: a Systematic
Review
An Academic presentation by
Dr. Nancy Agnes,Head,Technical Operations,Pubrica
Group: www.pubrica.com
Email: sales@pubrica.com

2. In brief
Introduction
Motivations
Search strategy
Challenges
Recommendations
Methodological aspects
Conclusion
References
TODAY'S DISCUSSION

3. Mobile applications have attracted much attention recently
(in the future, "apps").
Some of these applications aren't very useful, and they
don't have a lot of material, so they don't benefit end-
users as much as they should.
This study aims to examine and analyse papers related to
medical app evaluation across various platforms.
It also attempted to explore academic problems, motives,
and suggestions linked to quality evaluations and current
best practices in Systematic Review Writing.
IN BRIEF

4. Contd..
.
INTRODUCTION
Mobile applications have attracted a lot of attention in
recent years.
Their everyday usage has become established in the lives of
people worldwide, with estimates putting the number of
app users at about 2.5 billion in 2019.
Applications built to run on mobile devices are referred to
as mobile apps.

5. Because of the rapid adoption of smartphones and other benefits, such as their
efficacy, accessibility, and convenience, not only for end-users but also for
developers who are driven to produce apps rather than web-based services to
Conducting a Systematic Review.
The quantity and popularity of these applications are rapidly growing. Because
of their popularity, apps include a wide range of content, including business,
education, medical, gaming, sports, and more.
To evaluate app content, a systematic or quality evaluation is required.
Such evaluations need considerably more than just knowledge and expertise, and
they are frequently time-consuming and technically challenging.
Contd...

6. This is a fragmented process that sometimes necessitates continuous subjectivity.
The slow-paced scientific technique for app review, the lack of features that
may assist discover potentially beneficial applications, and the shortage of
available apps that have been empirically examined are all barriers to app quality
evaluations.
Pursuing this assessment domain was urged for various reasons, including the
quality of information in an app or information for an app, which would assist in
creating a quality-based app and the consideration of strategies to ensure the
app's quality.
Apps that require quality control and validation are also called for in the
literature.

7. For various scientific reasons, researchers and scholars are
drawn to their recognised professions.
Some people are inspired by the importance of themes
such as hot trends in research, new ideas, and special
issues in scientific journals.
while others are interested in the advantages the topics
may provide, such as treating a sickness, raising awareness,
or making any contribution.
Different significances and motives reveal academics'
interest in Systematic App Assessment over mobile
applications.
MOTIVATIONS

9. SEARCH STRATEGY
The content was only chosen based on research
publications and review articles during the search and
screening process in Clinical Trial Systematic Review
Services.
This choice was judged the best for identifying the most
recent and related items pertinent to the review's assigned
topic.

10. CHALLENGES
The most typical academic problems that a researcher may
confront are issues and concerns.
Whether or not a challenge is directly connected to a
researcher's field of interest or has an indirect influence, it
necessitates further efforts to address it and progress
science in that domain.
Challenges are dispersed throughout numerous categories
for systematic evaluation of mobile applications, and they
are grouped based on similar qualities to make them easier
to grasp for future researchers and studies.

11. RECOMMENDATIONS
A researcher's perspective on a specific issue changes
considerably by the conclusion of the research journey.
Much information was gathered, and a researcher's
experience increased. Furthermore, one of the essential
aims for academicians and researchers is to mitigate such
concerns and determine what kind of academic message
should be delivered to other researchers on that subject.
Contd...

12. As a result, this section summarises researchers' work by
proposing future mobile app evaluation studies.
The subsection recognises three critical points: content,
research, and development, and provides good suggestions
to each.

13. METHODOLOGICAL
ASPECTS
This section discusses the methodological aspects of prior
studies on mobile applications and their evaluation.
Various elements are examined and recognised to
enlighten future scholars in this field who have used similar
settings and methodologies in Writing A Systematic Review.

14. CONCLUSION
The number of studies relating to mobile applications
continues to rise. However, despite the relevance of the
prior debate, it still requires further assessment measures.
Mobile app assessment is considered an emerging and
essential topic.
The study's key contributions include a comprehensive
survey and classification of mobile app evaluation and
techniques.
Contd...

15. In the literature, several patterns have been discovered, and the articles
that have been recognised have been divided into two groups.
Challenges, reasons, and recommendations fall under the first category
related to dialogue.
The second category is concerned with the methodological elements of
app evaluation.
Such contributions would help in a better understanding and progression
of the subject. Then, different applications were focused on other app
evaluation purposes, and various academics were involved.

16. ABOUT PUBRICA
develop
can be
Pubrica's team of researchers and authors
Scientific and medical research papers that
indispensable tools to the practitioner/authors.
Pubrica Medical Writers Help you write and edit the
introduction by introducing the reader to the
shortcomings or empty spaces in the identified research
field.
Our experts know the structure that follows the broad
topic, the problem, and background and advance to a
narrow topic to state the hypothesis.

17. REFERENCES
Tang AK. A systematic literature review and analysis on
mobile apps in m-commerce: implications for future
research. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2019;37:100885.
Alamoodi, A.H., Garfan, S., Zaidan, B.B. et al. A
systematic review into the assessment of medical apps:
motivations, challenges, recommendations and
methodological aspect. Health Technol. 10, 1045–1061
(2020).

18. UNITED KINGDOM
+44 1618186353
INDIA
+91-9884350006
EMAIL
sales@pubrica.co
m
Contact
Us