1. Consolidation of Memories
Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology
Instructor: John Miyamoto
05/05/2016: Lecture 06-4
Note: This Powerpoint presentation may contain macros that I wrote to help me create the slides. The macros
aren’t needed to view the slides. You can disable or delete the macros without any change to the presentation.
2. Outline
• Consolidation of memories
• Standard model of consolidation
(Alternative theory: The multiple trace model of consolidation)
• Disruption of memory reconsolidation as a treatment for PTSD
Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr ‘16 2
Lecture probably
ends here
Consolidation of Memories
3. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 3
Consolidation of Memories
• Recently created memories are typically fragile.
♦ Without additional retrievals, they are often too weak to retrieve.
♦ A concussion soon after learning can cause permanent loss of a memory.
♦ Fragility of new memories implies that it takes cognitive processing after the
initial experience to create a strong memory.
Goldstein, Figure 7.16
Typical pattern of retrograde
amnesia. The recent past
is the least consolidated -
it is the most likely to be lost.
More distant past is more
consolidated - it is more likely
to be preserved.
• Consolidation is the process by which a memory is transformed from an
unstable state to a more permanent state.
What Is Happening During Consolidation?
4. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 4
What Is Happening During Memory Consolidation?
Changes are happening at two levels:
• Synaptic Consolidation:
Repeated experience causes changes at the level of the synapse.
♦ These changes occur quickly, over a matter of minutes.
• Systems Consolidation:
Repeated retrievals cause changes in the organization of
neural circuits that represent memories.
♦ These changes occur gradually, over days, months or even years.
Synaptic Changes During Learning – Long-Term Potentiation
5. Goldstein (2014),
Figure 7.14,
p. 194
Synaptic Consolidation
Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 5
Long-Term Potentiation (LTP): Structural changes at synapse result in
increased firing to the same stimulus.
Same Diagram without Emphasis Rectangles
1st Presentation
of Stimulus
Continued
Presentation
of Stimulus
After Many
Presentations
of Stimulus
Structural
Changes
Increased
firing
(LTP)
6. Goldstein (2014),
Figure 7.14,
p. 194
Synaptic Consolidation
Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 6
Long-Term Potentiation (LTP): Structural changes at synapse result in
increased firing to the same stimulus.
System Consolidation - Long-Term Process of Memory Formation
1st Presentation
of Stimulus
Continued
Presentation
of Stimulus
After Many
Presentations
of Stimulus
Structural
Changes
Increased
firing
(LTP)
7. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 7
System Consolidation:
The Time Course of Memory Formation
Figure 7.15 (p. 195) attempts to explain the role of the hippocampus
in the encoding and consolidation of memories.
Same Diagram – Emphasis Rectangle on Left
Hippocampus
Cortical Areas
Cortical Areas Cortical Areas
Hippocampus Hippocampus
Hippocampus
8. Hippocampus
Cortical Areas
Cortical Areas Cortical Areas
Hippocampus Hippocampus
Hippocampus
Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 8
The Time Course of Memory Formation
Initial Encoding of
Current Experience
Same Diagram – Emphasis Rectangle on Middle
9. Hippocampus
Cortical Areas
Cortical Areas Cortical Areas
Hippocampus Hippocampus
Hippocampus
Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 9
The Time Course of Memory Formation
Retrieval of
Episodic Memory
Same Diagram – Emphasis Rectangle on Right
10. Hippocampus
Cortical Areas
Cortical Areas Cortical Areas
Hippocampus Hippocampus
Hippocampus
Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 10
The Time Course of Memory Formation
Retrieval (After Much Learning)
of Episodic Memory
Transition to Diagrams That Show the Same Process But With Different Graphics
11. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 11
The next slides display the same ideas as the preceding
slides, but with more informative graphics.
The next set of slides show:
The Standard Model
of Memory Consolidation
Explanation of Consolidation in terms of Brain Diagrams
12. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 12
This
slide
is
based
on
instructional
material
that
was
downloaded
from
the
Pearson
Publishers
website
(http://vig.prenhall.com)
for
Smith
&
Kosslyn
(2006;
ISBN
9780131825086).
1: Processing of current
information activates
different brain areas in
occipital, parietal, temporal
and frontal cortex.
2: Multiple brain activations
spread to hippocampus
(convergence zone).
Somehow, hippocampus binds
multimodal inputs together and
encodes long-term memory.
Event or
episode
Diagram of Brain Activity During Retrieval
Encoding
Event or
episode
13. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 13
This
slide
is
based
on
instructional
material
that
was
downloaded
from
the
Pearson
Publishers
website
(http://vig.prenhall.com)
for
Smith
&
Kosslyn
(2006;
ISBN
9780131825086).
3: At time of recall, partial cues stimulate
some brain areas that were also activated
at encoding.
5: Somehow, the
hippocampus triggers
pattern completion
(partial reactivation of
original activation
pattern).
Same Diagram with Statement of Recapitulation Hypothesis
4: Activation
spreads to the
hippocampus.
Retrieval
Partial
cue
Partial
cue
Partial
cue
14. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 14
This
slide
is
based
on
instructional
material
that
was
downloaded
from
the
Pearson
Publishers
website
(http://vig.prenhall.com)
for
Smith
&
Kosslyn
(2006;
ISBN
9780131825086).
Reactivation Before & After Consolidation
Retrieval
Reactivation Hypothesis:
(Goldstein, p. 195)
Episodic retrieval involves
reinstatement of activations that
were present during encoding.
Hippocampus plays an important role
in reactivation.
15. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 15
Retrieval
BEFORE consolidation
has been completed.
Retrieval
AFTER consolidation
has been completed.
Standard Model of Consolidation:
Multiple Trace Model of Consolidation
16. Multiple Trace Model of Consolidation
• Multiple trace model is opposed to the standard model of consolidation.
• According to this model, the hippocampus is involved in retrieval
of remote episodic memories as well as recent episodic memories,
but only if they are not semanticized.
• Semanticization of Episodic Memories & the Remember/Know Distinction
♦ Hippocampus is active during retrieval of remote episodic memories that
the subjects "remember", but not during the retrieval of memories that the
subjects "know" are true, but don't "remember".
♦ Intuitive ideas: Over time, memories can become facts (as opposed
to retrieval of experiences). Retrieval of facts may not involve the
hippocampus to the same degree as retrieval of experiences.
○ This is called the semanticization of memories (transformation of a memory
from being episodic to being semantic).
Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 16
Consolidation & Reconsolidation
17. Consolidation & Reconsolidation
• Fact to be discussed later in this lecture:
♦ When a memory is retrieved, it is vulnerable to change.
♦ After retrieval of a memory, it is necessary to store the memory again to
return it to a permanent state.
• Consolidation refers to processes
that change an initially encoded
memory into a permanent memory.
• Reconsolidation refers to processes
that restore a memory to a more
permanent form after it has been
retrieved.
Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 17
Sometimes consolidation
& reconsolidation are
referred to together as
“consolidation.”
Role of Sleep in Consolidation
18. Interestingly Enough, .....
• Sleep (dreaming?) plays a functional role in promoting consolidation.
♦ Rat brain cells that fire together while exploring a location also show
increased firing during subsequent sleep. Not true of other cells that did not
fire during exploration.
♦ Disruption of dreaming seems to disrupt consolidation.
♦ Similar effects with humans who are learning to play tetris.
• Some evidence suggests that if a subject expects to be tested
on Topic A but not on Topic B, then sleep (possibly, dreaming)
enhances future memory of Topic A more than Topic B.
• Role of sleep in consolidation is not understood, but there
seems to be a significant relationship between sleep and
consolidation.
Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 18
Summary of Standard Model of Consolidation
19. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 19
Summary re Standard Model of Consolidation
Consolidation & reconsolidation ...
... long-term memory representations become more stable
over time;
... hippocampus plays a central role in retrieval of incompletely
consolidated memories;
... over time, retrieval of memories becomes independent
from the hippocampus and other medial temporal lobe
activity.
Memory Representations are Malleable at Time of Retrieval
20. Memories Representations Are Malleable
At Time of Retrieval
• Hypothesis:
When memories are retrieved, they are vulnerable to change.
• Under special circumstances, when memories are retrieved,
memories can be altered, even wiped out.
♦ Can these ideas be used to develop a treatment for PTSD?
Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 20
Undoing Fear Conditioning in the Rat
21. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 21
Undoing Fear Conditioning in the Rat
Nader, K., Schafe, G. E., & Le Doux, J. E. (2000). Fear memories require protein synthesis in the
amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature, 406, 722-726.
• If a tone is paired with an electric shock, a rat will learn
to freeze when it hears the tone (classical conditioning of fear).
• Anisomycin – antibiotic that inhibits protein synthesis that
is required in the formation of new memories.
• Administering anisomycin to a rat can cause it to fail to learn.
Experimental Design (Diagram of Rat Learning or Unlearning)
22. Experimental Design
Condition 2:
Day 1: Tone + Shock
Day 2: Drug; no tone; no shock
Day 3: Freezes to tone
(shows learning)
Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 22
Repeat This Slide with Emphasis Rectangles
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Figure 7.20
Condition 1:
Day 1: Tone + Shock + anisomycin
Day 2: No drug; no tone; no shock
Day 3: Does not freeze to tone
(shows no learning)
Condition 3:
Day 1: Tone + Shock
Day 2: Drug + tone, no shock.
Day 3: Does not freeze to tone
(shows no learning)
23. Experimental Design
Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 23
Summary of Results
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Figure 7.20
Condition 2:
Day 1: Tone + Shock
Day 2: Drug; no tone; no shock
Day 3: Freezes to tone
(shows learning)
Condition 1:
Day 1: Tone + Shock + anisomycin
Day 2: No drug; no tone; no shock
Day 3: Does not freeze to tone
(shows no learning)
Condition 3:
Day 1: Tone + Shock
Day 2: Drug + tone, no shock.
Day 3: Does not freeze to tone
(shows no learning)
24. Summary of Main Finding
Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 24
Retrieval Makes Day 1 Learning Vulnerable to Change
Drug on Day 2 does not undo
fear conditioning.
Combining drug with tone &
shock on Day 1 prevents
fear conditioning.
Combining drug with retrieval
of fear conditioning on Day 2
undoes fear conditioning.
Condition 2:
Day 1: Tone + Shock
Day 2: Drug; no tone; no shock
Day 3: Freezes to tone
(shows learning)
Condition 1:
Day 1: Tone + Shock + anisomycin
Day 2: No drug; no tone; no shock
Day 3: Does not freeze to tone
(shows no learning)
Condition 3:
Day 1: Tone + Shock
Day 2: Drug + tone, no shock.
Day 3: Does not freeze to tone
(shows no learning)
25. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 25
• Retrieval makes the fear conditioning from Day 1 vulnerable to change.
Combining retrieval with drug prevents reconsolidation of memory of fear
conditioning, thereby causing loss of conditioning.
Condition 3
displayed
to the right:
• Nader et al. (2000) state that the memory trace is "labile" during retrieval,
i.e., its form can be changed at that time.
Interpretation
Using Fragility of Memories During Retrieval to Treat PTSD
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
26. The following slides pertaining to the treatment of PTSD are the same as
the ones that were displayed in class, but an improved version of these
slides will be presented on Monday 05/09/2016. You should use the
Monday slides because they are more clear.
Psych 355,, Miyamoto, Spr '16 26
Note Added After the Lecture on Thursday 05/05/2016
27. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 27
Using the Fragility of Memories During Retrieval to Treat PTSD
Brunet, A., Orr, S. P., Tremblay, J., Robertson, K., Nader, K., & Pitman, R. K. (2008). Effect of post-
retrieval propranolol on psychophysiologic responding during subsequent script-driven traumatic
imagery in post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 42, 503-506.
• Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): Strong fear and stress
responses are evoked by reminders of the initial traumatic event.
• Brunet et al. asked whether human PTSD patients can lose
or at least diminish their fear and stress conditioning by
techniques that are similar to Nader et al.'s demonstration
that rats can lose their fear conditioning.
♦ Study used propranolol, a drug that is used to prevent traumatic memories
if administered immediately following a traumatic event. Propranolol
reduces the fear & stress conditioning of trauma.
Brunet et al.'s Subjects Were PTSD Patients
28. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 28
Brunet et al.'s Study of PTSD Subjects
• PTSD patients: Childhood sexual abuse, motor vehicle accident, rape,
being taken hostage.
♦ Comorbid mental disorders included: major depressive disorder, panic
disorder, social phobia, bulimia, generalized anxiety disorder.
• Two scripts were prepared for each patient that described the
events that produced the trauma for that patient.
• 19 PTSD patients were randomly assigned to either a treatment
condition or a placebo control condition.
♦ Both Conditions: Patient hears a 30-second recording describing
their traumatic experience.
♦ Treatment Condition: Patient is injected with propranolol immediately
following recording.
♦ Control Condition: Patient is injected with a placebo that has no active
ingredients.
Test of Treatment - Was It Efficacious?
29. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 29
Test of Treatment
• One week later, the patients listened to a taped version of
the scripts that described their traumatic experience, and
are asked to imagine the traumatic events while listening to the tape.
♦ Physiological measures of stress and anxiety are taken while patients
listen to the tape.
• Question: When the patients hear the taped version of traumatic
experience, will they experience fear, anxiety, etc. of PTSD?
♦ I.e., has the drug treatment reduced or eliminated their tendency to
associate fear responses with these memories.
Analogy Between Rat Conditioning and PTSD Treatment
30. HUMAN RAT
Traumatic experience Tone + shock conditioning in the rat
Listen to taped Rat hears tone without the shock
description of
traumatic experience
Injection of propranolol Injection of anisomycin
immediately after recall immediately after rat hears tone
Later, the rat seems to have
unlearned the fear conditioning
to the tone.
Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 30
Later, will the human seem to
have unlearned the fear
conditioning to the traumatic
memories?
Analogy Between PTSD Treatment & Conditioning
Experimental Results
31. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 31
Brunet et al. Results
• Grey = placebo group; Black = propranolol group
• Result: Therapy reduces original fear conditioning.
Heart Rate Skin Conductance Corrugator EMG
Tensing of
Frowning Muscles
Return to Malleability of Memory During Retrieval
Y-Axis
Are
Z-Scores
Relative
to
Base
Rate
32. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 32
Brunet et al. Results
• Grey = placebo group; Black = propranolol group
• Result: Therapy reduces original fear conditioning.
Heart Rate Skin Conductance Corrugator EMG
Return to Malleability of Memory During Retrieval
Y-Axis
Are
Z-Scores
Relative
to
Base
Rate
Tensing of
Frowning Muscles
34. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 34
Malleability of Memories During Retrieval
• Learned associations can be lost during retrieval
♦ Rats unlearned tone-shock connection
♦ Humans unlearn (to some degree) the association between a
traumatic episodic memory and the emotional response
• Consolidation & Reconsolidation –
memories can be strengthened during retrieval
♦ Practice testing (retrieval) produces better future recall
• Do these results contradict each other?
• Stored representations can change during retrieval.
♦ Usually the change makes the memory stronger, better organized,
more linked to other memories, especially to retrieval cues.
♦ The opposite can also happen, e.g., rats unlearn their fear conditioning,
or humans become desensitized to memories of trauma. This special case
is based on the injection of drugs that would not normally be present.
No!
Conclusions re Consolidation – END
35. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 35
Conclusion re Consolidation
• Consolidation occurs through reactivation of memories,
followed by re-encoding of the memories.
• Hippocampus plays a major role in reactivation for recent memories.
After the memories have been consolidated, the hippocampus plays a
reduced role in retrieval of memories.
• Memories are malleable during or shortly after retrieval.
END