Meeting the school needs of patients with chronic conditions
1. SCHOOL-BASED SERVICES FOR
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Gail M. Cheramie, Ph.D., NCSP, LSSP
Associate Professor and Director,
School Psychology Program
Univ. of Houston-Clear Lake
5. DISABILITY CATEGORIES
 Autism,
 Deaf-Blindness
 Auditory Impairment
 Emotional Disturbance
 Intellectual Disability
(previously Mental
Retardation)
 Multiple Disabilities
 Orthopedic Impairment
 Other Health Impairment
 Learning Disability
 Speech Impairment
 Traumatic Brain Injury
 Visual Impairment
 Non-categorical Early
Childhood
By reason of the condition, the student requires
special education supports and services
6. WHAT IS SPECIAL EDUCATION?
 Specially designed instruction – adapting
content, methodology, or delivery of instruction to
meet the individual, unique needs of the student
that result from the child’s disability
 Modifications – changes that affect standards and
expectations
 Accommodations – reasonable when they provide
students with disabilities an equal opportunity to
participate without lowering or fundamentally
altering the academic standards.
7. RELATED SERVICES
 Assistive technology
 Speech therapy
 Physical therapy
 Occupational therapy
 Psychological services
 Social work
 Counseling
 Special transportation
 Audiology services
 Orientation and mobility training
 Rehabilitation counseling
 School nursing services and school health services
 Interpreter services
Services that are
necessary for the
student to benefit from
special education
services; Require
evaluation
8. REFERRAL FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION
EVALUATION (19 T.A.C. 89.1011)
 Prior to referral, students
experiencing difficulty in the
general education classroom
should be considered for all
support services available to all
students, such as
tutorial, remedial, compensatory,
and other services.
9. PROCESS OF REFERRAL
 Concerns expressed about a student by teacher –
concerns can also be brought by parents
 Case presented and discussed at the school Problem-
Solving Team (PST)
 Data are gathered (e.g., grades, criterion-performance
levels, cumulative record, information brought by parent)
and determinations are made regarding next steps
 If student is identified as at-risk, then standard
intervention protocol is usually applied
ď‚— e.g., student below specified %ile rank or level in first grade
receives Reading Recovery services
ď‚— Progress-monitoring data is collected throughout intervention
10. PROCESS OF REFERRAL
 PST meets again to review progress
 Depending on progress, action recommendations
can include
ď‚— Discontinue intervention due to criterion performance
met
ď‚— Maintain intervention type and intensity
ď‚— Increase intensity
ď‚— Change intervention
 Suspect disability condition – Refer for FIE
 This process is usually referred to as a Response
to Intervention (RtI) model
11. RTI DEFINITION
 “Response to intervention integrates assessment
and intervention within a multi-level prevention
system to maximize student achievement and to
reduce behavior problems. With RTI, schools use
data to identify students at risk for poor learning
outcomes, monitor student progress, provide
evidence-based interventions and adjust the
intensity and nature of those interventions
depending on a student’s responsiveness, and
identify students with learning disabilities or other
disabilities.”
• National Center on Response to Intervention
12. THREE-TIER MODEL
80%
15%
5%
Universal Interventions
•All students
•Preventative, proactive
Group Interventions
•Some students (at risk)
•High efficiency
•Rapid response
Intensive, Ind. Interventions
•Individual students
•Assessment-based
•High intensity
•Longer duration
13.
14.
15. FULL AND INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION (FIE)
 Must meet certain standards (e.g., multiple
measures, valid & reliable, evaluate in all areas
of suspected disability, …)
 Determines if student meets the criteria for a
disability condition – there are specified
conditions in the IDEA and Texas
Commissioner’s Rules
 Makes recommendations
16. CONDITION:
DISORDER + ADVERSE IMPACT
 Presence of a disorder that meets legal and
professional criteria
ď‚— IDEA criteria for disability categories
ď‚— Consider additional professional standards that
would apply if IDEA not specific (e.g., ADHD:
DSM-IV-TR, NASP, AAP)
 Adverse impact on educational performance
ď‚— Academic
ď‚— Behavior
ď‚— Developmental
 FIE determines condition
21. SECTION 504: INTENT
 Designed to eliminate discrimination on the basis of
disability in any program or activity receiving federal
funds
 Must have disability to be protected
21
22. DISABILITY DEFINITION
 Individual must have…
ď‚— Physical or mental impairment that substantially
limits one or more major life activities,
ď‚— Have a record of having such an impairment,
ď‚— Or is regarded as having such impairment
22
23. PHYSICAL OR MENTAL IMPAIRMENT
 Any physiological disorder or condition, cosmetic
disfigurement, or anatomical loss affecting one of
more of bodily systems
(e.g, neurological, musculoskeletal, respiratory, car
diovascular, digestive, etc.) or
 Any mental or psychological disorder (e.g., mental
retardation, emotional or mental illness, learning
disability).
 No exhaustive list of specific diseases or
conditions.
23
25. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS
 This term applies to many things ranging from
making a facility accessible to providing an
accommodation on an examination.
 An accommodation is reasonable if it does not
compromise the nature, content, and integrity of the
test.
 Accommodations are reasonable when they
provide students with disabilities an equal
opportunity to participate without lowering or
fundamentally altering the academic standards.
25
27. POINTS FOR DISCUSSION
 Many services and interventions can be provided
outside of special education; special education
should be last resort
 Schools can refuse to evaluate if data do not
indicate a suspected disability or need for specially
designed instruction
 Clinical or Medical Diagnosis ≠“Student with a
Disability” under IDEA
 Parents can refuse special education placement /
revoke consent for placement to terminate services
 Parents can refuse to provide consent for
evaluation, but district can seek override
28. POINTS FOR DISCUSSION
 Parents can disagree with school FIE and request
and Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE)
 If evaluation or other information is given to
school, school personnel will likely contact the
service provider (if parent gives permission)
 It is important for external evaluators to contact
school personnel (if they have parent permission) to
determine how the student is performing in school
and what interventions are being done
 Best practice is collaboration