Cloning involves creating an exact genetic copy of an organism. There are two main types of cloning: artificial embryo twinning and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Artificial embryo twinning mimics natural twinning, while somatic cell nuclear transfer transfers the nucleus of a donor adult cell into an egg cell. Cloning can be used for reproductive cloning to create copies of existing organisms or therapeutic cloning to derive stem cells for research and medical purposes. While cloning offers potential medical benefits, it also poses risks such as low success rates and premature aging in clones.
How Human Cloning Will Make Us Better HumansFrank Taylor
Many people fear human cloning without realizing the many health benefits that come with organ manufacturing and limb regeneration. This is the dawn of huge advancements in human cloning.
This document discusses human cloning and genetic engineering. It provides background on genetics and the human genome project. It then discusses genetic disorders and scientific advances in cloning, including Dolly the sheep. Both arguments for and against human cloning are presented. While cloning could help infertile couples or allow people to be cloned, it may also lead to overpopulation or premature aging. The conclusion is that the benefits of human cloning outweigh the risks.
Cloning is the process of producing genetically identical individuals of an organism either naturally or artificially. Natural cloning occurs through asexual reproduction in bacteria, insects, and plants. Artificial cloning involves techniques used to clone DNA fragments, cells, or whole organisms. The first animal cloned was a frog in 1952. In 1996, Dolly the sheep was the first mammal cloned from an adult cell. Cloning works by transferring the nucleus of a donor adult cell into an egg cell with its nucleus removed. Potential benefits include species preservation and medical research applications like organ transplants. However, cloning faces ethical concerns and technical challenges like low success rates and premature aging.
Jean Trueblood recently turned 17 and was preparing for her freshman year of college with a potential focus on biology. She had written a paper on the ethics of cloning without knowing it would directly impact her own life. Dr. Cynthia Hayes, who won a Nobel Prize for cloning mammals, had secretly cloned herself due to kidney issues. She offered Jean's parents a deal - she would implant one of her cloned embryos in Jean's mother for a reduced fee, but the resulting child would have to donate a kidney to Dr. Hayes if needed. Jean's parents agreed despite the unusual terms. Jean was born and Dr. Hayes later demanded Jean donate a kidney, revealing her biological origins for the first time.
Hina Amir's presentation discusses various types of cloning including reproductive cloning, therapeutic cloning, DNA cloning, and replacement cloning. The document outlines both the benefits and risks of cloning. It notes cloning carries high risks of abnormalities, health issues, and legal/ethical concerns. Cloning could also lead to a lack of genetic diversity, extinction, and views humans as products rather than individuals.
The document discusses human cloning and its opposition by the Catholic Church. It provides three main reasons for the Church's opposition:
1) Cloning is a depersonalized way to reproduce that treats humans as products and denies their dignity.
2) It threatens basic human relationships and concepts of family by allowing things like a woman being a twin of her mother.
3) Cloning involves experimenting on and destroying human embryos, threatening life itself.
Cloning is the creation of an exact genetic copy of an organism. Dolly the sheep, born in 1996, was the first cloned mammal. Since then, several other species have been cloned including mice, cats, and South Korean scientists cloned human embryos in 2004. However, experiments to clone humans have failed or been deemed impossible by experts. The process of cloning involves removing the nucleus of an egg and replacing it with the nucleus of the cell being cloned. The egg is then stimulated to divide and develop into an embryo. The embryo can then be implanted into a surrogate mother. While cloning may have medical benefits, it also poses serious health and ethical risks that must still be addressed.
Cloning involves creating an exact genetic copy of an organism. There are two main types of cloning: artificial embryo twinning and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Artificial embryo twinning mimics natural twinning, while somatic cell nuclear transfer transfers the nucleus of a donor adult cell into an egg cell. Cloning can be used for reproductive cloning to create copies of existing organisms or therapeutic cloning to derive stem cells for research and medical purposes. While cloning offers potential medical benefits, it also poses risks such as low success rates and premature aging in clones.
How Human Cloning Will Make Us Better HumansFrank Taylor
Many people fear human cloning without realizing the many health benefits that come with organ manufacturing and limb regeneration. This is the dawn of huge advancements in human cloning.
This document discusses human cloning and genetic engineering. It provides background on genetics and the human genome project. It then discusses genetic disorders and scientific advances in cloning, including Dolly the sheep. Both arguments for and against human cloning are presented. While cloning could help infertile couples or allow people to be cloned, it may also lead to overpopulation or premature aging. The conclusion is that the benefits of human cloning outweigh the risks.
Cloning is the process of producing genetically identical individuals of an organism either naturally or artificially. Natural cloning occurs through asexual reproduction in bacteria, insects, and plants. Artificial cloning involves techniques used to clone DNA fragments, cells, or whole organisms. The first animal cloned was a frog in 1952. In 1996, Dolly the sheep was the first mammal cloned from an adult cell. Cloning works by transferring the nucleus of a donor adult cell into an egg cell with its nucleus removed. Potential benefits include species preservation and medical research applications like organ transplants. However, cloning faces ethical concerns and technical challenges like low success rates and premature aging.
Jean Trueblood recently turned 17 and was preparing for her freshman year of college with a potential focus on biology. She had written a paper on the ethics of cloning without knowing it would directly impact her own life. Dr. Cynthia Hayes, who won a Nobel Prize for cloning mammals, had secretly cloned herself due to kidney issues. She offered Jean's parents a deal - she would implant one of her cloned embryos in Jean's mother for a reduced fee, but the resulting child would have to donate a kidney to Dr. Hayes if needed. Jean's parents agreed despite the unusual terms. Jean was born and Dr. Hayes later demanded Jean donate a kidney, revealing her biological origins for the first time.
Hina Amir's presentation discusses various types of cloning including reproductive cloning, therapeutic cloning, DNA cloning, and replacement cloning. The document outlines both the benefits and risks of cloning. It notes cloning carries high risks of abnormalities, health issues, and legal/ethical concerns. Cloning could also lead to a lack of genetic diversity, extinction, and views humans as products rather than individuals.
The document discusses human cloning and its opposition by the Catholic Church. It provides three main reasons for the Church's opposition:
1) Cloning is a depersonalized way to reproduce that treats humans as products and denies their dignity.
2) It threatens basic human relationships and concepts of family by allowing things like a woman being a twin of her mother.
3) Cloning involves experimenting on and destroying human embryos, threatening life itself.
Cloning is the creation of an exact genetic copy of an organism. Dolly the sheep, born in 1996, was the first cloned mammal. Since then, several other species have been cloned including mice, cats, and South Korean scientists cloned human embryos in 2004. However, experiments to clone humans have failed or been deemed impossible by experts. The process of cloning involves removing the nucleus of an egg and replacing it with the nucleus of the cell being cloned. The egg is then stimulated to divide and develop into an embryo. The embryo can then be implanted into a surrogate mother. While cloning may have medical benefits, it also poses serious health and ethical risks that must still be addressed.
Cloning involves creating genetically identical organisms through artificial means. There are two main types of cloning: artificial embryo twinning, which splits an embryo into two, and somatic cell nuclear transfer, where the nucleus of an adult cell is transferred into an egg cell. In 1996, Dolly the sheep was the first mammal cloned from an adult cell using somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cloning may have medical benefits like organ transplants but also risks like developmental failures and depriving clones of individuality.
The document discusses cloning endangered species and the arguments for and against it. It presents four arguments for cloning endangered species: 1) It could help the environment by absorbing carbon dioxide, 2) It is important for replenishing endangered species to prevent their extinction, 3) Future generations would enjoy species that are now extinct, and 4) Cloning endangered species poses less risk than cloning extinct species since their environment is already known. However, it also presents four arguments against cloning: 1) Cloned animals and surrogates often suffer health problems and deformities, 2) Cloning has a very low success rate and requires hundreds of attempts, 3) Some view cloning as unnatural and against religion, and 4) There is a risk
Is Human Reproductive Cloning Morally Permissible?Gwynne Brunet
The subject of human reproductive cloning is a complicated one which contains many issues that need to be understood, and considered; before a course of action can be taken. In regards to cloning, any decision that will be agreed upon, in our distant future, will not be simply black and white, but instead it will be a colorful array of restrictions, rules, laws, supervision, and ethical standards. In this paper, I will evaluate the facts, and determine, through moral reasoning, whether human reproductive cloning is morally permissible.
Cloning involves replacing the nucleus of an unfertilized egg with the nucleus of a donor cell, creating a genetically identical copy. While cloning differs from sexual reproduction by using a single donor's genes, early experiments cloned sea urchins in 1894, salamanders in 1902, and Dolly the sheep in 1996 was the first mammal cloned from an adult cell. However, cloned animals often suffer health issues and low survival rates due to the experimental nature. While some seek pet cloning for $50,000 despite pet overpopulation, it treats animals as products and exploits grieving owners. Human cloning raises ethical concerns about physical harms, effects on families and society, and challenges the idea that humans are uniquely created in God
This document discusses several principles of genetics including dominance, co-dominance, genetic disorders, and human cloning. It provides arguments for and against human cloning. While cloning could help endangered species, cloning humans may result in individuals who are very different from the original despite having the same genes. Overall, the document concludes that cloning humans should not be allowed due to risks of significant differences in personality and behaviors compared to the original person.
International academy of ecology and medicineFazil Ajaz
This document discusses cloning in animals and humans. It begins by defining different types of cloning such as molecular, cellular, embryo twinning, and reproductive cloning. It then discusses the history of cloning, including early experiments in the late 19th century and successful cloning of frogs in 1952. Major milestones are highlighted, such as Dolly the sheep in 1996 being the first mammal cloned from an adult cell. The steps in cloning are outlined along with issues regarding cloning animals and humans, including religious concerns about playing God, ethical issues around treating clones as property, and potential medical issues in cloned offspring.
This document provides an overview of human cloning, including:
- An introduction to different types of cloning like reproductive cloning used to create Dolly the sheep and therapeutic cloning to grow stem cells.
- Examples of human cloning research like the first hybrid human clone created in 1998.
- Pros and cons of human cloning that address issues like reduced individuality but also curing disease.
- Discussion of the future of human cloning and debates around ethics and whether people would clone themselves.
- FAQs that address if cloning a human is possible and what countries allow certain types of cloning research.
This document discusses cloning, including its definition, history, process, advantages, disadvantages, applications, and future. It provides definitions of cloning and discusses some of the first animals cloned, like Dolly the sheep. It also outlines legal and ethical issues with animal cloning, benefits of GE animals, the cloning process, and advantages and disadvantages of animal cloning. Some disadvantages are low success rates and health issues in cloned animals. Applications include biomedical research and livestock breeding. The future of cloning may include protecting endangered species and enhancing animal traits, but it also poses risks.
Experiments conducted on cloning have had varying levels of success and failure over time. There are religious, medical, ethical, and legal issues to consider regarding human cloning. While some see benefits like combating disease, others worry about undermining human dignity, diversity, and the role of God as creator. Government regulations on cloning vary widely in different parts of the world.
The document discusses the potential benefits of organ cloning through therapeutic cloning. It provides arguments from experts in favor of funding therapeutic cloning research. The key points made are that therapeutic cloning could produce transplantable organs that are an exact genetic match and thus avoid organ rejection. It could save lives by providing alternatives to organ donation waiting lists. While some view human cloning as unethical, therapeutic cloning only produces organs and tissues, not whole humans. Funding this research could help many patients in need of organ transplants.
Cloning research has proven progressive for curing disease, but ethical issues have prevented it from being used more extensively in medical research. Cloning could help solve world hunger by reproducing productive plant varieties without insects and make food cheaper and more plentiful. However, cloning all plants and animals of a given type would reduce genetic diversity, leaving species vulnerable to new diseases. Cloning stem cells could produce more cells to repair damaged human tissue, but the technique would likely only be accessible to the wealthy as it is very expensive. While cloning research may help reduce miscarriages by providing insights into the process, it is considered an immoral practice that goes against religious concepts of God creating each human. Overall, cloning shows medical promise but
Cloning is the process of creating a genetically identical copy of an organism. The document outlines the history of cloning experiments from sea urchins in 1894 to Dolly the sheep in 1996. It describes the main types as DNA cloning, reproductive cloning, and therapeutic cloning. Reproductive cloning aims to create copies of existing organisms while therapeutic cloning produces stem cells for medical research. The document discusses advantages like maintaining good genetics in animals, risks like low success rates and health issues in clones, and applications in biomedical research and livestock breeding.
This document discusses the ethical issues surrounding human cloning. It provides a brief history of cloning, noting that the concept originated from botany but now refers to identical genetic copies of organisms produced artificially. The document outlines the differences between sexual reproduction and cloning by nuclear transfer. Recent advances in cloning research on animals are also examined. The ethical issues of research cloning versus reproductive cloning, and the potential for adult stem cells to replace embryonic stem cells, are explored. The international community's discussion on regulating cloning is also summarized.
This document discusses cloning endangered and extinct animal species. It provides background on cloning, including the history of cloning important animals like Dolly the sheep. The document outlines some of the pros of cloning endangered species, such as preserving their unique genetic code and boosting wild populations. However, it also notes some cons, such as low cloning success rates, health issues in clones, and reducing genetic diversity. The overall goal of cloning endangered species is to help preserve them and further scientific understanding.
The document discusses several topics related to genetics and human cloning including:
1. It provides an overview of genetic disorders including multifactorial disorders, chromosome abnormalities, and single-gene disorders.
2. It discusses reasons why human cloning should not be pursued, noting the lack of scientific expertise, health risks to clones, and ethical concerns about cloned humans.
3. In conclusion, the document determines that human cloning is a bad idea given current limitations and risks.
Dolly the sheep was the first mammal successfully cloned from an adult cell. She was cloned at the Roslin Institute in the UK in 1996 from a cell taken from a six-year-old ewe. Dolly gave birth to six lambs over her lifetime and helped demonstrate that cloning is possible in mammals.
Human cloning involves transferring the nucleus of a human cell into an egg cell whose nucleus has been removed. Therapeutic cloning uses stem cells from a cloned embryo to treat diseases but destroys the embryo, which some find morally wrong. Reproductive cloning would clone entire humans by implanting a cloned embryo into a womb to be born, resulting in an exact genetic copy of the donor.
The document discusses the potential benefits of organ cloning through therapeutic cloning. It presents arguments from several experts and religious leaders for and against therapeutic cloning. While most oppose human reproductive cloning, some support therapeutic cloning as it could produce matched transplant tissues for patients through stem cells from cloned embryos without creating a new human life. Therapeutic cloning could save lives by providing transplant organs without risk of rejection as the organs would be genetically identical, and reduce reliance on organ donors. However, others argue that therapeutic cloning commodifies human life.
There are three main types of cloning: gene cloning, reproductive cloning, and therapeutic cloning. Gene cloning involves collecting DNA fragments from an organism and cloning them into vectors. Reproductive cloning produces a genetic duplicate of an existing organism, like Dolly the sheep. It is opposed by some due to safety and ethical concerns. Therapeutic cloning creates embryonic stem cells which researchers hope to use to grow healthy tissues to replace damaged or diseased ones. Cloning offers both potential medical benefits like organ transplants and stem cell therapies, as well as risks like uncertainty in the process, inheriting diseases, and potential for abuse. Any discussion on cloning must consider both its value and inherent risks.
Organ cloning could help people who need organ transplants by providing a genetic match without rejection risks. However, cloning technology is still inefficient and unsafe - most cloning attempts fail and clones often develop health problems. While organ cloning could reduce the need for donors, more research is needed to address the low success rates and health risks before considering cloning human organs.
Cloning involves creating genetically identical organisms through artificial means. There are two main types of cloning: artificial embryo twinning, which splits an embryo into two, and somatic cell nuclear transfer, where the nucleus of an adult cell is transferred into an egg cell. In 1996, Dolly the sheep was the first mammal cloned from an adult cell using somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cloning may have medical benefits like organ transplants but also risks like developmental failures and depriving clones of individuality.
The document discusses cloning endangered species and the arguments for and against it. It presents four arguments for cloning endangered species: 1) It could help the environment by absorbing carbon dioxide, 2) It is important for replenishing endangered species to prevent their extinction, 3) Future generations would enjoy species that are now extinct, and 4) Cloning endangered species poses less risk than cloning extinct species since their environment is already known. However, it also presents four arguments against cloning: 1) Cloned animals and surrogates often suffer health problems and deformities, 2) Cloning has a very low success rate and requires hundreds of attempts, 3) Some view cloning as unnatural and against religion, and 4) There is a risk
Is Human Reproductive Cloning Morally Permissible?Gwynne Brunet
The subject of human reproductive cloning is a complicated one which contains many issues that need to be understood, and considered; before a course of action can be taken. In regards to cloning, any decision that will be agreed upon, in our distant future, will not be simply black and white, but instead it will be a colorful array of restrictions, rules, laws, supervision, and ethical standards. In this paper, I will evaluate the facts, and determine, through moral reasoning, whether human reproductive cloning is morally permissible.
Cloning involves replacing the nucleus of an unfertilized egg with the nucleus of a donor cell, creating a genetically identical copy. While cloning differs from sexual reproduction by using a single donor's genes, early experiments cloned sea urchins in 1894, salamanders in 1902, and Dolly the sheep in 1996 was the first mammal cloned from an adult cell. However, cloned animals often suffer health issues and low survival rates due to the experimental nature. While some seek pet cloning for $50,000 despite pet overpopulation, it treats animals as products and exploits grieving owners. Human cloning raises ethical concerns about physical harms, effects on families and society, and challenges the idea that humans are uniquely created in God
This document discusses several principles of genetics including dominance, co-dominance, genetic disorders, and human cloning. It provides arguments for and against human cloning. While cloning could help endangered species, cloning humans may result in individuals who are very different from the original despite having the same genes. Overall, the document concludes that cloning humans should not be allowed due to risks of significant differences in personality and behaviors compared to the original person.
International academy of ecology and medicineFazil Ajaz
This document discusses cloning in animals and humans. It begins by defining different types of cloning such as molecular, cellular, embryo twinning, and reproductive cloning. It then discusses the history of cloning, including early experiments in the late 19th century and successful cloning of frogs in 1952. Major milestones are highlighted, such as Dolly the sheep in 1996 being the first mammal cloned from an adult cell. The steps in cloning are outlined along with issues regarding cloning animals and humans, including religious concerns about playing God, ethical issues around treating clones as property, and potential medical issues in cloned offspring.
This document provides an overview of human cloning, including:
- An introduction to different types of cloning like reproductive cloning used to create Dolly the sheep and therapeutic cloning to grow stem cells.
- Examples of human cloning research like the first hybrid human clone created in 1998.
- Pros and cons of human cloning that address issues like reduced individuality but also curing disease.
- Discussion of the future of human cloning and debates around ethics and whether people would clone themselves.
- FAQs that address if cloning a human is possible and what countries allow certain types of cloning research.
This document discusses cloning, including its definition, history, process, advantages, disadvantages, applications, and future. It provides definitions of cloning and discusses some of the first animals cloned, like Dolly the sheep. It also outlines legal and ethical issues with animal cloning, benefits of GE animals, the cloning process, and advantages and disadvantages of animal cloning. Some disadvantages are low success rates and health issues in cloned animals. Applications include biomedical research and livestock breeding. The future of cloning may include protecting endangered species and enhancing animal traits, but it also poses risks.
Experiments conducted on cloning have had varying levels of success and failure over time. There are religious, medical, ethical, and legal issues to consider regarding human cloning. While some see benefits like combating disease, others worry about undermining human dignity, diversity, and the role of God as creator. Government regulations on cloning vary widely in different parts of the world.
The document discusses the potential benefits of organ cloning through therapeutic cloning. It provides arguments from experts in favor of funding therapeutic cloning research. The key points made are that therapeutic cloning could produce transplantable organs that are an exact genetic match and thus avoid organ rejection. It could save lives by providing alternatives to organ donation waiting lists. While some view human cloning as unethical, therapeutic cloning only produces organs and tissues, not whole humans. Funding this research could help many patients in need of organ transplants.
Cloning research has proven progressive for curing disease, but ethical issues have prevented it from being used more extensively in medical research. Cloning could help solve world hunger by reproducing productive plant varieties without insects and make food cheaper and more plentiful. However, cloning all plants and animals of a given type would reduce genetic diversity, leaving species vulnerable to new diseases. Cloning stem cells could produce more cells to repair damaged human tissue, but the technique would likely only be accessible to the wealthy as it is very expensive. While cloning research may help reduce miscarriages by providing insights into the process, it is considered an immoral practice that goes against religious concepts of God creating each human. Overall, cloning shows medical promise but
Cloning is the process of creating a genetically identical copy of an organism. The document outlines the history of cloning experiments from sea urchins in 1894 to Dolly the sheep in 1996. It describes the main types as DNA cloning, reproductive cloning, and therapeutic cloning. Reproductive cloning aims to create copies of existing organisms while therapeutic cloning produces stem cells for medical research. The document discusses advantages like maintaining good genetics in animals, risks like low success rates and health issues in clones, and applications in biomedical research and livestock breeding.
This document discusses the ethical issues surrounding human cloning. It provides a brief history of cloning, noting that the concept originated from botany but now refers to identical genetic copies of organisms produced artificially. The document outlines the differences between sexual reproduction and cloning by nuclear transfer. Recent advances in cloning research on animals are also examined. The ethical issues of research cloning versus reproductive cloning, and the potential for adult stem cells to replace embryonic stem cells, are explored. The international community's discussion on regulating cloning is also summarized.
This document discusses cloning endangered and extinct animal species. It provides background on cloning, including the history of cloning important animals like Dolly the sheep. The document outlines some of the pros of cloning endangered species, such as preserving their unique genetic code and boosting wild populations. However, it also notes some cons, such as low cloning success rates, health issues in clones, and reducing genetic diversity. The overall goal of cloning endangered species is to help preserve them and further scientific understanding.
The document discusses several topics related to genetics and human cloning including:
1. It provides an overview of genetic disorders including multifactorial disorders, chromosome abnormalities, and single-gene disorders.
2. It discusses reasons why human cloning should not be pursued, noting the lack of scientific expertise, health risks to clones, and ethical concerns about cloned humans.
3. In conclusion, the document determines that human cloning is a bad idea given current limitations and risks.
Dolly the sheep was the first mammal successfully cloned from an adult cell. She was cloned at the Roslin Institute in the UK in 1996 from a cell taken from a six-year-old ewe. Dolly gave birth to six lambs over her lifetime and helped demonstrate that cloning is possible in mammals.
Human cloning involves transferring the nucleus of a human cell into an egg cell whose nucleus has been removed. Therapeutic cloning uses stem cells from a cloned embryo to treat diseases but destroys the embryo, which some find morally wrong. Reproductive cloning would clone entire humans by implanting a cloned embryo into a womb to be born, resulting in an exact genetic copy of the donor.
The document discusses the potential benefits of organ cloning through therapeutic cloning. It presents arguments from several experts and religious leaders for and against therapeutic cloning. While most oppose human reproductive cloning, some support therapeutic cloning as it could produce matched transplant tissues for patients through stem cells from cloned embryos without creating a new human life. Therapeutic cloning could save lives by providing transplant organs without risk of rejection as the organs would be genetically identical, and reduce reliance on organ donors. However, others argue that therapeutic cloning commodifies human life.
There are three main types of cloning: gene cloning, reproductive cloning, and therapeutic cloning. Gene cloning involves collecting DNA fragments from an organism and cloning them into vectors. Reproductive cloning produces a genetic duplicate of an existing organism, like Dolly the sheep. It is opposed by some due to safety and ethical concerns. Therapeutic cloning creates embryonic stem cells which researchers hope to use to grow healthy tissues to replace damaged or diseased ones. Cloning offers both potential medical benefits like organ transplants and stem cell therapies, as well as risks like uncertainty in the process, inheriting diseases, and potential for abuse. Any discussion on cloning must consider both its value and inherent risks.
Organ cloning could help people who need organ transplants by providing a genetic match without rejection risks. However, cloning technology is still inefficient and unsafe - most cloning attempts fail and clones often develop health problems. While organ cloning could reduce the need for donors, more research is needed to address the low success rates and health risks before considering cloning human organs.
To Clone or not to Clone The Ethical Question Joseph Farnsw.docxturveycharlyn
This document discusses the ethical issues surrounding human cloning. It begins by introducing a scenario where a couple is in a car accident and the husband is left in a vegetative state, unable to have children. The wife hears of cloning as a way to have his children. The document then defines human cloning as using somatic cell nuclear transfer to produce a genetically identical human. It outlines some potential medical benefits of cloning like organ transplants and rejuvenation, but also potential harms around individuality and genetic variation. Both sides of the ethical debate around cloning are presented, with arguments for allowing it to help infertile couples and further research, and against it due to unknown risks and its violation of natural reproduction. The document concludes that each
Cloning involves producing genetically identical copies of biological material. Researchers have cloned genes, cells, tissues and entire organisms like Dolly the sheep. There are three main types of cloning: gene cloning to copy DNA, reproductive cloning to copy whole animals, and therapeutic cloning to derive stem cells for research and potential medical treatments. While cloning techniques have advanced, human cloning remains controversial due to ethical concerns and lack of evidence it has been achieved. Therapeutic cloning could help medical research but requires embryo destruction.
This document discusses organ cloning and genetic disorders. It begins with basic principles of genetics such as dominant and recessive alleles. It then discusses the human genome project and its goals. There are three types of genetic disorders: single gene disorders, multi-factorial disorders, and chromosome abnormalities. Ways to avoid genetic disorders include genetic counseling. The document presents four arguments for and against organ cloning and concludes that the benefits of organ cloning outweigh the concerns.
This document discusses some of the ethical concerns regarding human cloning. It begins by providing background on the first cloning of Dolly the sheep in 1996. While other mammals have been cloned successfully since then, cloning humans raises significant ethical issues. Some argue that cloning undermines individuality and could lead to humans being viewed as products. Others are concerned about the health risks if cloning techniques are applied to humans, as animal cloning experiments have often resulted in deformities. Overall most experts argue that human cloning should be prohibited due to the threats it poses to human dignity and individuality.
1) A dominant allele's trait always shows up when present, while a recessive allele is masked by a dominant allele. Co-dominance occurs when neither allele is fully dominant or recessive.
2) The Human Genome Project, started in 1990, aimed to study human genetics to find cures for diseases like cancer. It raised legal issues around genetic engineering and privacy, as well as social issues of how findings may affect society.
3) Genetic disorders can be single-gene, chromosomal, or multifactorial from lifestyle/environmental factors. Examples include Down syndrome from an extra chromosome.
I have uploaded the complete document, with all the pages including the cover page, the acknowledgement, certificate and contents along with the Project content. Just download it and modify it and your project is ready, if that is all you have wanted. Otherwise use it as a reference for your project. "!!! IF YOU FIND IT WORTHY AT ALL, THEN GIVE ME A LIKE !!!" - It will motivate me to upload more such documents. -THANK YOU
This document discusses animal cloning and the controversy surrounding it. It begins by defining animal cloning as a process that produces genetically identical offspring through transferring somatic cell nuclei into oocytes. It then notes that when Dolly the sheep was cloned, public interest in cloning grew. The document concludes by stating that cloning has the potential to modify genetic traits in individuals and could be applied to plants as well. Overall, the document provides a brief overview of animal cloning and touches on some of the debate around its applications and implications.
This document discusses human cloning and provides information on several related topics. It begins with basic principles of genetics, including dominant and recessive alleles. It then discusses the Human Genome Project and its goals. Next, it defines different types of genetic disorders. It provides pros and cons of human cloning, discussing the potential benefits like bringing people back to life as well as risks like defects. While cloning is challenging and dangerous, the conclusion supports funding cloning research for medical and other purposes.
Tis endangered and or extinct species cloningMorganScience
The document discusses the goals, ethical considerations, and laws surrounding the Human Genome Project. The project aimed to map the human genome between 1990-2003. It sought to identify all human genes, determine DNA sequences, and address related ethical, legal and social issues. Some implications included concerns about privacy of genetic information and potential discrimination. Laws like GINA were passed to protect privacy of genetic data.
Similar to Me, Myself & I (is it possible?) #SciChallenge2017 (12)
Immersive Learning That Works: Research Grounding and Paths ForwardLeonel Morgado
We will metaverse into the essence of immersive learning, into its three dimensions and conceptual models. This approach encompasses elements from teaching methodologies to social involvement, through organizational concerns and technologies. Challenging the perception of learning as knowledge transfer, we introduce a 'Uses, Practices & Strategies' model operationalized by the 'Immersive Learning Brain' and ‘Immersion Cube’ frameworks. This approach offers a comprehensive guide through the intricacies of immersive educational experiences and spotlighting research frontiers, along the immersion dimensions of system, narrative, and agency. Our discourse extends to stakeholders beyond the academic sphere, addressing the interests of technologists, instructional designers, and policymakers. We span various contexts, from formal education to organizational transformation to the new horizon of an AI-pervasive society. This keynote aims to unite the iLRN community in a collaborative journey towards a future where immersive learning research and practice coalesce, paving the way for innovative educational research and practice landscapes.
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvementIshaGoswami9
As the population is increasing and will reach about 9 billion upto 2050. Also due to climate change, it is difficult to meet the food requirement of such a large population. Facing the challenges presented by resource shortages, climate
change, and increasing global population, crop yield and quality need to be improved in a sustainable way over the coming decades. Genetic improvement by breeding is the best way to increase crop productivity. With the rapid progression of functional
genomics, an increasing number of crop genomes have been sequenced and dozens of genes influencing key agronomic traits have been identified. However, current genome sequence information has not been adequately exploited for understanding
the complex characteristics of multiple gene, owing to a lack of crop phenotypic data. Efficient, automatic, and accurate technologies and platforms that can capture phenotypic data that can
be linked to genomics information for crop improvement at all growth stages have become as important as genotyping. Thus,
high-throughput phenotyping has become the major bottleneck restricting crop breeding. Plant phenomics has been defined as the high-throughput, accurate acquisition and analysis of multi-dimensional phenotypes
during crop growing stages at the organism level, including the cell, tissue, organ, individual plant, plot, and field levels. With the rapid development of novel sensors, imaging technology,
and analysis methods, numerous infrastructure platforms have been developed for phenotyping.
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...Travis Hills MN
Travis Hills of Minnesota developed a method to convert waste into high-value dry fertilizer, significantly enriching soil quality. By providing farmers with a valuable resource derived from waste, Travis Hills helps enhance farm profitability while promoting environmental stewardship. Travis Hills' sustainable practices lead to cost savings and increased revenue for farmers by improving resource efficiency and reducing waste.
Unlocking the mysteries of reproduction: Exploring fecundity and gonadosomati...AbdullaAlAsif1
The pygmy halfbeak Dermogenys colletei, is known for its viviparous nature, this presents an intriguing case of relatively low fecundity, raising questions about potential compensatory reproductive strategies employed by this species. Our study delves into the examination of fecundity and the Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) in the Pygmy Halfbeak, D. colletei (Meisner, 2001), an intriguing viviparous fish indigenous to Sarawak, Borneo. We hypothesize that the Pygmy halfbeak, D. colletei, may exhibit unique reproductive adaptations to offset its low fecundity, thus enhancing its survival and fitness. To address this, we conducted a comprehensive study utilizing 28 mature female specimens of D. colletei, carefully measuring fecundity and GSI to shed light on the reproductive adaptations of this species. Our findings reveal that D. colletei indeed exhibits low fecundity, with a mean of 16.76 ± 2.01, and a mean GSI of 12.83 ± 1.27, providing crucial insights into the reproductive mechanisms at play in this species. These results underscore the existence of unique reproductive strategies in D. colletei, enabling its adaptation and persistence in Borneo's diverse aquatic ecosystems, and call for further ecological research to elucidate these mechanisms. This study lends to a better understanding of viviparous fish in Borneo and contributes to the broader field of aquatic ecology, enhancing our knowledge of species adaptations to unique ecological challenges.
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically youngSérgio Sacani
The Milky Way’s (MW) inner stellar halo contains an [Fe/H]-rich component with highly eccentric orbits, often referred to as the
‘last major merger.’ Hypotheses for the origin of this component include Gaia-Sausage/Enceladus (GSE), where the progenitor
collided with the MW proto-disc 8–11 Gyr ago, and the Virgo Radial Merger (VRM), where the progenitor collided with the
MW disc within the last 3 Gyr. These two scenarios make different predictions about observable structure in local phase space,
because the morphology of debris depends on how long it has had to phase mix. The recently identified phase-space folds in Gaia
DR3 have positive caustic velocities, making them fundamentally different than the phase-mixed chevrons found in simulations
at late times. Roughly 20 per cent of the stars in the prograde local stellar halo are associated with the observed caustics. Based
on a simple phase-mixing model, the observed number of caustics are consistent with a merger that occurred 1–2 Gyr ago.
We also compare the observed phase-space distribution to FIRE-2 Latte simulations of GSE-like mergers, using a quantitative
measurement of phase mixing (2D causticality). The observed local phase-space distribution best matches the simulated data
1–2 Gyr after collision, and certainly not later than 3 Gyr. This is further evidence that the progenitor of the ‘last major merger’
did not collide with the MW proto-disc at early times, as is thought for the GSE, but instead collided with the MW disc within
the last few Gyr, consistent with the body of work surrounding the VRM.
Or: Beyond linear.
Abstract: Equivariant neural networks are neural networks that incorporate symmetries. The nonlinear activation functions in these networks result in interesting nonlinear equivariant maps between simple representations, and motivate the key player of this talk: piecewise linear representation theory.
Disclaimer: No one is perfect, so please mind that there might be mistakes and typos.
dtubbenhauer@gmail.com
Corrected slides: dtubbenhauer.com/talks.html
The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defectsSérgio Sacani
Assuming spherical symmetry and weak field, it is shown that if one solves the Poisson equation or the Einstein field
equations sourced by a topological defect, i.e. a singularity of a very specific form, the result is a localized gravitational
field capable of driving flat rotation (i.e. Keplerian circular orbits at a constant speed for all radii) of test masses on a thin
spherical shell without any underlying mass. Moreover, a large-scale structure which exploits this solution by assembling
concentrically a number of such topological defects can establish a flat stellar or galactic rotation curve, and can also deflect
light in the same manner as an equipotential (isothermal) sphere. Thus, the need for dark matter or modified gravity theory is
mitigated, at least in part.
ESR spectroscopy in liquid food and beverages.pptxPRIYANKA PATEL
With increasing population, people need to rely on packaged food stuffs. Packaging of food materials requires the preservation of food. There are various methods for the treatment of food to preserve them and irradiation treatment of food is one of them. It is the most common and the most harmless method for the food preservation as it does not alter the necessary micronutrients of food materials. Although irradiated food doesn’t cause any harm to the human health but still the quality assessment of food is required to provide consumers with necessary information about the food. ESR spectroscopy is the most sophisticated way to investigate the quality of the food and the free radicals induced during the processing of the food. ESR spin trapping technique is useful for the detection of highly unstable radicals in the food. The antioxidant capability of liquid food and beverages in mainly performed by spin trapping technique.
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
2. Theoretically, yes and it is possible through cloning.
Years ago, people may have laughed at even a suggestion of such a question (and some
still do). However, with our many recent advancements in the world of science, cloning
has become one of the next BIG things. We could even be seeing clones within 20-50
years if we have some breakthroughs in the research! Nevertheless, cloning has some
drawbacks and people are currently divided in whether or not cloning a human should
legalised.
There are many good arguments for and against cloning, and in this presentation we will
analyse what it is, what it can be used for and its ethics.
3. But first, how does cloning work?
There are, in fact, three different types cloning; these are: DNA cloning (a.k.a. "recombinant DNA
technology,"or "gene cloning”), reproductive cloning, and therapeutic cloning.
DNA cloning
To get multiple copies of a gene or other piece of DNA you must isolate, or ‘cut’, the DNA from its source
and then ‘paste’ it into a DNA vector that can replicate (or copy) itself.
The four main steps in DNA cloning are:
Step 1. The chosen piece of DNA is ‘cut’ from the source organism using
restriction enzymes.
Step 2. The piece of DNA is ‘pasted’ into a vector and the ends of the DNA are
joined with the vector DNA by ligation.
Step 3. The vector is introduced into a host cell, often a bacterium or yeast, by a
process called transformation. The host cells copy the vector DNA along with
their own DNA, creating multiple copies of the inserted DNA.
Step 4. The vector DNA is isolated (or separated) from the host cells’ DNA and
purified.
DNA that has been ‘cut’ and ‘pasted’ from an organism into a vector is called
recombinant DNA. Because of this, DNA cloning is also called recombinant DNA
technology.
4. Reproductive cloning is a technology used to generate an animal that has the same
nuclear DNA as another currently or previously existing animal. Human cloning also
falls into this category. Dolly was created by reproductive cloning technology. In a
process called "somatic cell nuclear transfer" (SCNT), the DNA information from the
nucleus of a donor adult cell is copied into a cell whose nucleus (thus also its genetic
material) has been removed. Chemicals or electric current are used to stimulate cell
division. Once the cells start dividing and the embryo reaches a suitable stage, it is
planted into the uterus of a female host where it (hopefully) develops until birth.
Reproductive Cloning
5. Therapeutic cloning
Therapeutic cloning is like reproductive cloning, except that the embryos
are not allowed to develop fully. The point of therapeutic cloning is to
extract the stem cells from the embryos and study them. When the egg
has been cloned and divided for 5 days, the stem cells are extracted from
it. The embryos are destroyed due to the extraction process, which raises
ethical concerns
But why the need for stem cells? The answer lies in the composition of
these cells. Stem cells are unspecialised cells which can transform into
any of the 220 cell types that are in the human body. Many researchers
hope that one day stem cells can be used to serve as replacement cells to
treat heart disease, Alzheimer's, cancer, and various other diseases.
6. Cloning in Nature
Despite what a lot people think, cloning is not an unnatural or abnormal thing.
In fact, it happens in nature all the time. Cloning in nature is known as asexual
reproduction and occurs in plants and some animals including starfish and sea
anemones . Asexual reproduction needs only one parent which means there is no
fusion of gametes and no mixing of genetic information. So technically the offspring
are genetically identical to the parent and to each other; ergo, they are clones.
Asexual reproduction in plants can take a number of forms. Many plants develop
underground food storage organs that later develop into the following year's plants.
Potato plants and daffodil plants do this, for example.
7. What cloning can be used for.
Cloning can be useful to us in many different ways.
For example, DNA cloning is used to create a large number of copies
of a gene or other piece of DNA. The cloned DNA can then be used to:
Work out the function of the gene, investigate a gene’s
characteristics (size, expression, tissue distribution), look at how
mutations may affect a gene’s function and make large
concentrations of the protein coded for by the gene.
Therapeutic cloning is useful as it gives us stem cells. These cells are
unspecialised cells and can therefore change into any of the 220
different cell types in the body.This means that they can be used as
replacement cells so treat heart disease, alzheimer’s or other
diseases which kill cells.
8. Advantages of cloning
• All clones are genetically identical therefore it would be possible to clone animals
or plants with the desired characteristics.
• Organisms that are difficult to breed normally, can be reproduced quickly. For
example, some plant varieties do not produce seeds and others have seeds that
are dormant for long periods of time.
• It could make it possible for previously extinct species to be cloned born from a
suitable carrier.
• It could heavily influence the medical world through stem cell research.
• Organs may eventually be possible to clone and organ transplants would be a lot
easier as your body wont reject something with your own genetic material.
If you cloned Henry IV, would he be Henry V or Henry IV Jr. or wait, Henry IV the second?
9. Disadvantages of cloning
• If a donor is susceptible to disease then all clones made from its genetic material
would become susceptible.
• It would lead to less variation, and opportunity to create new variations in the
future.
• Not a lot is known about cloning humans yet so it could be dangerous.
• It has been proven that if we were to clone a human they wouldn’t live for as long
as their donor as they have already inherited DNA which has already begun to age.
Would there be a market for genetic "factory seconds" and "irregulars"?
10. What health threat could it cause
• Physical Health:
We still do not know what the possible health threats could be to both the donors and the clone, therefore
we have to be especially careful as to not cause serious harm to either people.
In the case of dolly the sheep she contracted crippling arthritis and lung cancer and died at the age of 7 which
is 5 years shorter then that of most sheep. This poses the question should we allow people to be clone if we
know the clone’s life will be considerably shorter.
Currently cloning is also unsuccessful a lot of time in experiments. For example, Dolly the sheep was the only
successful clone from 227 attempts.
• Mental Health:
If we were to clone humans we need to take into account how it could effect their mental health negatively,
especially if they were to know that their life will be shorter to that of their donor’s and if they are simply a
means to an end. This could make them think their life is worthless except from what they were specifically
created for.
11. Is cloning Ethical?
The ethics of cloning has been a big contributing factor into why scientist are not
cloning humans already, it is a huge topic of conversation as we need to
remember that the clone is still human therefore also has human rights. There
are many arguments against cloning to do with ethic, but I think that the biggest
one is that it is unethical to view a human being-regardless of its age- as a means
to an end. Even supporters of embryonic stem cell research and other embryo
research have long been opposed to the "special creation of embryos solely for
the purpose of research." However, this is precisely what is
involved in research cloning.
12. If cloning occurs in nature already, why don’t we
just clone humans already?
• The first argument against this is that there is no natural-case of mammals cloning
themselves, it is only seen in plants and microbes. Therefore it is difficult to
predict what will happen to the clone. What we already know suggests that the
clone will live a substantially shorter life to the original holder of the DNA,
because if you were to clone someone who was 30 years old the un-born clones
DNA would already have aged to that of a 30 year olds therefore there would
already be mistakes in the DNA that the clone would inherit
• Many people believe that we should clone humans to supply organs to people
who are in need of them, but then we to take into account the clones human
rights.
Is it true that if you clone yourself four times, one will be Chinese?
13. The End
Thank you for watching our presentation!
We hope that you enjoyed it and maybe even
learnt a thing or two.