SlideShare a Scribd company logo
C.O.
No. Corporate Objectives
1 Create a focus on customers as "king" by 1Q of 2015
2 Develop an empowered competent workforce by end of 2015
3 Improve operational performance
4 Reduce cost (2.5% based on CASK and controllable costs) while improving operational efficiency every year starting 2015
5 Accelerate growth in sales/revenue by 10% every year (RASK) considering the challenges in the industry
6 Build a culture of corporate social responsibility (including environmental accountability) by 2015
Page 1
M&E KPI
MAINTENANCE & ENGINEERING
2016 TARGET 97%
96.17% 92.40%
A.1. DEPARTMENTAL OBJECTIVES – AIRCRAFT AIRWORTHINESS Perceived grade 75%
Divisions Driver Measures Weight Rating Rating
MCC Coordination and troubleshooting 15% 13% 9%
LINE MAINT. Certification of aircraft released to service from line check 15% 14% 14%
BASE MAINT. Certification of aircraft released to service from minor and heavy
check
10% 10% 10%
GSE Availability of equipment to support line & base operations 10% 10% 10%
TechPlan Ensure availability of all maintenance resources 10% 10% 10%
FTM Aircraft reliability 10% 10% 10%
SHOP Availability of serviceable aircraft tools & equipment 10% 10% 10%
Tech Training Availability of certifying personnel 10% 10% 10%
Q&S Data integrity, audit & safety measures 10% 9% 9%
Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade
3 On-time FFO Delays due to coordination. (Base - Actual delay)
Base
10% 3 2 83% 5 2 90%
3 Minimize consequential flight disruption due to
AOG
Aircraft Technical disruption
timely coordination
(Base - total number of disruption)
Base
30% 40 33 79% 99 38 90%
3 Monitor the recurring remark per aircraft type Closure of workable open
recurring remark
(Base - Actual Open)
Base
15% 11 10 77% 11 9 80%
3 Monitor the Class 2 Fault per Q400 aircraft Closure of workable open class 2
fault
(Base - Actual Open)
Base
30% 5 1 95% 5 2 90%
3 Monitor the Airman Fault per aircraft type Closure of workable open Airman
fault
(Base - Actual Open)
Base
10 2 95% 10 4 90%
3 Average open workable MEL 2 per aircraft
(MEL/HIL)
Closure of workable open
HIL/MEL
(Base - Actual Open)
Base
10% 0.082 0 100% 0.082 0 100%
3 On-time submission of reportable events to
CAAP
Within 3 days or 72 hours upon
discovery
No delayed report
5% 0.082 0 100% 0.082 2 -510%
A.1.2 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – Line Aircraft Maintenance
Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade
3 On-time arrival/dispatch crew Delays due to awaiting crew (Base - Actual Delay)
Base
35% 1 1 75% 1 0 100%
3 No delay due to documentation
(AML, CML, NRC)
delays due to documentation. (Base - Actual Delay)
Base
30% 2 0 100% 2 1 88%
3 Flight Mechanic Availability delayed or cancelled flight due to
flight mechanic unavailability
(Base - Actual Delay)
Base
20% 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
3 Correct & complete documentation of task
deferment.
Not more than 1
incorrect/incomplete
documentation of deferment
(Base - Actual Delay)
Base
15% 2 0 100% 2 0 100%
A.1.3 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – Base - Aircraft Maintenance
Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade
3 On-time towing (R1 Hangar to Terminal) crew Delays due to unavailability of
towing crew
(Base - Actual Delay)
Base
15% 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
December 2015
A.1.1 DIVISIONS OBJECTIVES – Maintenance Control Center (MCC)
November 2015 December 2015
Objective
Manages and control aircraft serviceability
Manages the aircraft maintenance in line and outstation
Supports in establishing quality & safety within M&E
Administers training to ensure personnel competency
Grade Grade
94.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
November 2015
November 2015 December 2015
December 2015November 2015
Perform component maintenance certification and ensure adequate facility to
support maintenance
Monitors and control technical & engineering support
Manages the maintenance task forecasting, compliance & control
Manages the GSSD operations
Manages the compliance of base maintenance activities
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
90.25%
100.00%
59.57%
96.25%
100.00%
100.00%
87.24%
91.25%
Page 2
M&E KPI
3 No delay due to documentation
(AML, CML, NRC)
delays due to documentation.
(Base - Actual Delay)
Base
35% 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
3 Correct & complete documentation of task
deferment.
Not more than 1
incorrect/incomplete
documentation of deferment
(Base - Actual Delay)
Base
30% 2 0 100% 2 0 100%
3 On-time check output per planned resources
L-Check
A-Check
Late aircraft maintenance
release due to unavailability /lack
of manpower skill resources and
poor routine task compliance
planning /phasing
Total number of routine checks-Total number of late aircraft output
Total number of routine checks
20% 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
A.1.4 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – Ground Support Services (GSE)
Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade
3 On-time spotting for long towing Delays due to late spotting (Base - Actual Delay)
Base
25% 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
3 On-time rectification of unserviceable
equipment
Not more than 3 days repair (Base - Actual Delay)
Base
25% 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
3 Preventive maintenance implementation Done within specified interval Total number of maint. Event - total number of deferred maint
Total number of maint. Event
25% 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
3 Availability of ground equipment during
scheduled base maintenance
Equipment serviceability (Base - Actual Delay)
Base
25% 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
A.1.5 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – Technical Planning
Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade
3 Maintenance forecast validation Delays due to last minute
mainteannce forecast per month (Base - Actual Delays)
Base
40% 3 0 100% 3 0 100%
3 On-time check output per planned resources
L-Check
A-Check
Late aircraft output due to
unavailability of resources
(parts/material, consumable,
tooling, equipment) availability
from routine tasks per month
Total number of routine checks-Total number of late aircraft output
Total number of routine checks
25% 3 0 100% 3 0 100%
Ensure all parts avaiability of critical parts Availability of stocks (Base - Actual AOG)
Base
3 Zero AD overrun
Zero Routine & Non-routine task Overrun
100% compliance monitoring Zero incident
35%
0 0 100% 1 0 100%
A.1.6 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – Fleet Technical Management
Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade
3 On-time Engineering Response Request for Engineering Service
(RFES) input vs. output
No overdue reply 20% 0.083 0 100% 0.083 0 100%
1 Cabin Presentability Maximum three (3) workable
open Cabin Non-MEL per A/C
(Base - Actual Open)
Base
15% 3 0 100% 3 0 100%
3 Safe & Reliable Aircraft
On-time AD Evaluation
AD Evaluation Matrix:
- Emergency AD = 48 hours
- Compliance less than 6 months
or 2000FH/FC = 10 days
- Compliance is more than 6
months or 2000FH/FC = 30 days
No overdue AD evaluation 20% 0.083 0 100% 0.083 0 100%
3 On-time SB Review SB Review Matrix:
- Reliability Item = 3 days
- Other = 30 days
No overdue SB review 15% 0.083 0 100% 0.083 0 100%
November 2015 December 2015
November 2015 December 2015
December 2015November 2015
Page 3
M&E KPI
3 Technical Publication 2 Weeks upon receipt of new
revision
No overdue publication of new revisions 15% 0.083 0 100% 0.083 0 100%
3 Engine Condition Trend Monitoring Alert Closure (Base - Actual Open)
Base 15%
0.083 0 100% 0.083 0 100%
A.1.7 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – SHOP
Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade
TAT - 2 days Tire replacement No delayed output 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
TAT - 4 days OH No delayed output 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
TAT - 2 days Heat Sink
replacement No delayed output
1 0 100% 1 0 100%
TAT - 4 days OH No delayed output 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
TAT - 2 days Normal Charging No delayed output 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
TAT - 3 days OH No delayed output 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
3 Control & monitoring of tools & calibration Tools / PME serviceability Total number of tools endorsed for calibration within 30days
Number of tools scheduled for calibration
10% 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
1 0 100% 1 0 100%
A.1.8 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – Technical Training
Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade
2 Accommodate department training
requirements
Tech Training in-house capability
and/or availability
Total Training Conducted
Total Courses offerred
50% 2 0 100% 2 0 100%
2 On-time issuance of completion reports TAT - 2 days after training
completion
No. of on-time completion report issuance
Total Training Conducted
50% 1 0 100% 1 0 100%
1.5 0 100% 1.5 0 100%
A.1.9 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – Quality & Safety
Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade
3 Data Integrity Technical records updating,
forecasting & monitoring
- Aircraft Data & ENG- FH/FC
- AD - Airworthiness Directive
- LLP - Life Limited Parts
- TCC - Time Controlled
Component
Base - Actual Overrun
Base
40% 0.67 0 100% 0.67 0 100%
3 Zero incident/Accident -Injury to personnel in the
workplace
-Number of equipment causing
damage or injury
-Aircraft incident/accident
Base - Actual incident/accident
Base
15% 1 0 100% 1 1 75%
3 Safe & Reliable AIrcraft
Correct, complete & certified documentation
(AML, CML, NRC, MTC)
Noincorrect/incomplete
documentation for every a/c
released to service
Base - Actual incident
Base
15% 2 0 100% 2 0 100%
3 Safe & Reliable Aircraft
Closure of non-compliance / high risk finding
Closure within 90 days Base - Actual days in-progress
Base
30% 75 60 80% 75 60 80%
December 2015
November 2015 December 2015
3
Positive spare for Wheels
30%
3
Positive spare for Brakes
30%
3
Positive spare for Battery
30%
November 2015
November 2015
December 2015
Page 4
M&E Running Data from 2015
FORMULA
average 5 base 20
Coordination Doc Base Tow-GSE Tow-Mech Plan Equip Facility Parts Flight-Adj Bay-avail ATC perceived grade75% actual data 2
Jan 8 4 1 13 1 5 1 1 base 20 GRADE 90%
Feb 10 3 1 1 6 1 2 3 2
Mar 6 2 1 1 1 1
Apr 19 5 1 1 10 3
May 2 1 2
June 1
July 2 1 1
August 8 2 2 1
September 3 6 1
October 3 1
November 1
December 1
MCC
Coordination
Line
Coordinatio
n
Line
Doc
Base
Doc
TechPlan
Doc
Tow-GSE
Tow-
Mech
TechPlan Equip Facility
Recurring
Defect
(EST)
Class 2
fault
(EST)
Jan 8 0 4 0 0 0 1 13 0 1 10 2
Feb 10 0 3 0 0 1 1 6 0 1 10 3
Mar 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 10 5
Apr 19 0 5 0 0 1 1 10 0 0 10 8
May 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 10 7
Jun 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 6
Jul 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 10 4
Aug 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 10 4
Sep 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 2 1 0 10 3
Oct 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 10 2
Nov 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 6
Dec 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 16 6
Total 55 3 14 3 1 5 8 31 7 5 132 56
Average 5 0.25 1.272727 0.25 0.0833333 0.416667 0.666667 2.583333 0.583333 0.416667 11 4.666667
Coordination Doc Base Tow-GSE Tow-Mech Plan Equip Facility CoordinationDoc Tow-GSE Tow-Mech TechPLan Equip Facility
MCC 5 20
Line 0.25 1.42 1 5.68
Base 0.25 0.67 0.42 1 2.68 1.68
GSE 0.41 0.58 1.64 2.32
TechPlan 0.083 2.58 0.332 10.32
FTM 0.083 0.332
Shop
July AOG average
Orig Delay Delay
conseq
Delay
canxl
3016 1 1
3017 3 14 6
3018 2 4
3020 1 4 8
3032 1 3 2
3033 2 6
3036 1 8
3227 1 6 1
8398 2 14 4
8610 1 3
TOTAL 99
AVERAGE 3.96
Accident/Incident
Jan 0
Feb 1
Mar 1
Apr 0
May 2
Jun 2
Jul 2
Aug 0
Sep 3
Oct 0
Nov 0
Non-Mechanical Delay 2015
BASEAVERAGE
Dec 1
TOTAL 12
AVERAGE 1
Maintenance task Overrun
Jan 0
Feb 0
Mar 0
Apr 3
May 2
Jun 0
Jul 0
Aug 0
Sep 1
Oct 2
Nov 0
Dec 0
TOTAL 8
AVERAGE 0.67
HIGH Risk Finding Closure
Jan 0
Feb 0
Mar 0
Apr 3 60 60 90
May 2 60 150
Jun 0
Jul 0
Aug 0
Sep 1 60
Oct 2 60 60
Nov 0
Dec 0
TOTAL 8
AVERAGE 75
Incorrect documentation
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr 1 210
May
Jun 1 210
Jul
Aug 2 90 150
Sep 2 30 120
Oct
Nov
Dec
TOTAL 6
AVERAGE 1.5

More Related Content

What's hot

【Junior 新趨勢_自動駕駛】
【Junior 新趨勢_自動駕駛】【Junior 新趨勢_自動駕駛】
【Junior 新趨勢_自動駕駛】
Collaborator
 
Wire harness & cable assembly 基礎認識
Wire harness & cable assembly 基礎認識Wire harness & cable assembly 基礎認識
Wire harness & cable assembly 基礎認識
Yung Jui Chen 陳泳睿
 
Wire harness & cable assembly 進階瞭解
Wire harness & cable assembly 進階瞭解Wire harness & cable assembly 進階瞭解
Wire harness & cable assembly 進階瞭解Yung Jui Chen 陳泳睿
 
產業分析:航空
產業分析:航空產業分析:航空
產業分析:航空
Collaborator
 
Republic of South Sudan: Mining Investment Opportunities in South Sudan
Republic of South Sudan: Mining Investment Opportunities in South SudanRepublic of South Sudan: Mining Investment Opportunities in South Sudan
Republic of South Sudan: Mining Investment Opportunities in South Sudan
Mining On Top
 
期末.法律報告
期末.法律報告期末.法律報告
期末.法律報告莉雯 丁
 
20230816_氫谷與氫能城市案例初探
20230816_氫谷與氫能城市案例初探20230816_氫谷與氫能城市案例初探
20230816_氫谷與氫能城市案例初探
懂能源團隊
 
35. 안정적 창업을 위한 자금조달 이해
35. 안정적 창업을 위한 자금조달 이해35. 안정적 창업을 위한 자금조달 이해
35. 안정적 창업을 위한 자금조달 이해
창업 에듀
 
Case Study_CCL.pdf
Case Study_CCL.pdfCase Study_CCL.pdf
Case Study_CCL.pdf
Collaborator
 
火災分類及滅火方法
火災分類及滅火方法火災分類及滅火方法
火災分類及滅火方法You Chung Zeng
 
大尺寸面板市場-中國京東方擊敗南韓LGD龍頭地位
大尺寸面板市場-中國京東方擊敗南韓LGD龍頭地位大尺寸面板市場-中國京東方擊敗南韓LGD龍頭地位
大尺寸面板市場-中國京東方擊敗南韓LGD龍頭地位
Collaborator
 
臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明_簡報.pdf
臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明_簡報.pdf臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明_簡報.pdf
臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明_簡報.pdf
中 央社
 
車用連結器
車用連結器車用連結器
車用連結器
Collaborator
 

What's hot (13)

【Junior 新趨勢_自動駕駛】
【Junior 新趨勢_自動駕駛】【Junior 新趨勢_自動駕駛】
【Junior 新趨勢_自動駕駛】
 
Wire harness & cable assembly 基礎認識
Wire harness & cable assembly 基礎認識Wire harness & cable assembly 基礎認識
Wire harness & cable assembly 基礎認識
 
Wire harness & cable assembly 進階瞭解
Wire harness & cable assembly 進階瞭解Wire harness & cable assembly 進階瞭解
Wire harness & cable assembly 進階瞭解
 
產業分析:航空
產業分析:航空產業分析:航空
產業分析:航空
 
Republic of South Sudan: Mining Investment Opportunities in South Sudan
Republic of South Sudan: Mining Investment Opportunities in South SudanRepublic of South Sudan: Mining Investment Opportunities in South Sudan
Republic of South Sudan: Mining Investment Opportunities in South Sudan
 
期末.法律報告
期末.法律報告期末.法律報告
期末.法律報告
 
20230816_氫谷與氫能城市案例初探
20230816_氫谷與氫能城市案例初探20230816_氫谷與氫能城市案例初探
20230816_氫谷與氫能城市案例初探
 
35. 안정적 창업을 위한 자금조달 이해
35. 안정적 창업을 위한 자금조달 이해35. 안정적 창업을 위한 자금조달 이해
35. 안정적 창업을 위한 자금조달 이해
 
Case Study_CCL.pdf
Case Study_CCL.pdfCase Study_CCL.pdf
Case Study_CCL.pdf
 
火災分類及滅火方法
火災分類及滅火方法火災分類及滅火方法
火災分類及滅火方法
 
大尺寸面板市場-中國京東方擊敗南韓LGD龍頭地位
大尺寸面板市場-中國京東方擊敗南韓LGD龍頭地位大尺寸面板市場-中國京東方擊敗南韓LGD龍頭地位
大尺寸面板市場-中國京東方擊敗南韓LGD龍頭地位
 
臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明_簡報.pdf
臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明_簡報.pdf臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明_簡報.pdf
臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明_簡報.pdf
 
車用連結器
車用連結器車用連結器
車用連結器
 

Viewers also liked

Enfermedad vascular cerebral
Enfermedad vascular cerebralEnfermedad vascular cerebral
Enfermedad vascular cerebral
Rosmerita Rostran Suarez
 
Trasporte de Leo
Trasporte de LeoTrasporte de Leo
Trasporte de Leo
Leonardo Marcelo Dami Amaro
 
Capital Sander, la versión española del videojuegoGTA
Capital Sander, la versión española del videojuegoGTACapital Sander, la versión española del videojuegoGTA
Capital Sander, la versión española del videojuegoGTA
Alvaro García de Polavieja
 
Aula004
Aula004Aula004
Aula004
CENFATEE
 
Resume template 2
Resume template 2Resume template 2
Resume template 2
Dale Frank
 
Slide share test
Slide share testSlide share test
Slide share test
NCPetroff
 
Jvm11 10
Jvm11 10Jvm11 10
Jvm11 10
helpdeskUMP
 
Oscar 95
Oscar 95Oscar 95
Oscar 95
Oscararguello
 
Care by design 1 continuum article
Care by design 1 continuum articleCare by design 1 continuum article
Care by design 1 continuum articlePaul Grundy
 
Artesanias
ArtesaniasArtesanias
Artesanias
mbcuriosidades
 
Gestao e qualidade
Gestao e qualidadeGestao e qualidade
Gestao e qualidade
Sabrine Souza
 
[IIAM] Apresentação treinamento agro-processamento
[IIAM] Apresentação treinamento agro-processamento[IIAM] Apresentação treinamento agro-processamento
[IIAM] Apresentação treinamento agro-processamento
CCAFS | CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security
 
10 31 e21-1
10 31 e21-110 31 e21-1
10 31 e21-1
naughtonkyle
 
Asignación 1: Generalidades acerca de las TICs y la formación docente
Asignación 1: Generalidades acerca de las TICs y la formación docenteAsignación 1: Generalidades acerca de las TICs y la formación docente
Asignación 1: Generalidades acerca de las TICs y la formación docente
CENTRO PEDRO MARIA PAULINO VASQUEZ
 
alexis amores
alexis amoresalexis amores
alexis amores
Alexis Amores
 
Ricardo matheus novos ventos #8 - pvblica - democracia eletrônica
Ricardo matheus   novos ventos #8 - pvblica - democracia eletrônicaRicardo matheus   novos ventos #8 - pvblica - democracia eletrônica
Ricardo matheus novos ventos #8 - pvblica - democracia eletrônica
Ricardo Matheus
 
Adventureworks faq
Adventureworks faqAdventureworks faq
Adventureworks faqmoni2005
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Enfermedad vascular cerebral
Enfermedad vascular cerebralEnfermedad vascular cerebral
Enfermedad vascular cerebral
 
Trasporte de Leo
Trasporte de LeoTrasporte de Leo
Trasporte de Leo
 
Capital Sander, la versión española del videojuegoGTA
Capital Sander, la versión española del videojuegoGTACapital Sander, la versión española del videojuegoGTA
Capital Sander, la versión española del videojuegoGTA
 
Aula004
Aula004Aula004
Aula004
 
Resume template 2
Resume template 2Resume template 2
Resume template 2
 
Slide share test
Slide share testSlide share test
Slide share test
 
Jvm11 10
Jvm11 10Jvm11 10
Jvm11 10
 
Oscar 95
Oscar 95Oscar 95
Oscar 95
 
Care by design 1 continuum article
Care by design 1 continuum articleCare by design 1 continuum article
Care by design 1 continuum article
 
Artesanias
ArtesaniasArtesanias
Artesanias
 
Gestao e qualidade
Gestao e qualidadeGestao e qualidade
Gestao e qualidade
 
[IIAM] Apresentação treinamento agro-processamento
[IIAM] Apresentação treinamento agro-processamento[IIAM] Apresentação treinamento agro-processamento
[IIAM] Apresentação treinamento agro-processamento
 
10 31 e21-1
10 31 e21-110 31 e21-1
10 31 e21-1
 
Asignación 1: Generalidades acerca de las TICs y la formación docente
Asignación 1: Generalidades acerca de las TICs y la formación docenteAsignación 1: Generalidades acerca de las TICs y la formación docente
Asignación 1: Generalidades acerca de las TICs y la formación docente
 
alexis amores
alexis amoresalexis amores
alexis amores
 
Ricardo matheus novos ventos #8 - pvblica - democracia eletrônica
Ricardo matheus   novos ventos #8 - pvblica - democracia eletrônicaRicardo matheus   novos ventos #8 - pvblica - democracia eletrônica
Ricardo matheus novos ventos #8 - pvblica - democracia eletrônica
 
Adventureworks faq
Adventureworks faqAdventureworks faq
Adventureworks faq
 
Pràctica.1 química en acció
Pràctica.1  química en accióPràctica.1  química en acció
Pràctica.1 química en acció
 
04.12.2011 3
04.12.2011 304.12.2011 3
04.12.2011 3
 
04.12.2011 2
04.12.2011 204.12.2011 2
04.12.2011 2
 

Similar to M&E Key Performance Indicators 2016

MRM April 2015 ufl
MRM April 2015 uflMRM April 2015 ufl
MRM April 2015 ufl
Ateeb Ansari
 
Master review Dept performance.pptx
Master review Dept performance.pptxMaster review Dept performance.pptx
Master review Dept performance.pptx
RamkumarP32
 
Planned Maintenance.
Planned Maintenance.Planned Maintenance.
Planned Maintenance.
Hal Frohreich
 
Production Performance Results Internet Sample
Production Performance Results   Internet SampleProduction Performance Results   Internet Sample
Production Performance Results Internet Sample
antonioharenas
 
Optimization of preventive maintenance to reduce maintenance costs and increa...
Optimization of preventive maintenance to reduce maintenance costs and increa...Optimization of preventive maintenance to reduce maintenance costs and increa...
Optimization of preventive maintenance to reduce maintenance costs and increa...
MECandPMV
 
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork
 
USCG R&D Center’s Analysis of Standard Boat Asset Project Office (APO’s) Met...
USCG R&D Center’s Analysis of Standard Boat Asset Project Office (APO’s) Met...USCG R&D Center’s Analysis of Standard Boat Asset Project Office (APO’s) Met...
USCG R&D Center’s Analysis of Standard Boat Asset Project Office (APO’s) Met...
Peter Stinson
 
Zero Defect Competition @ July 22.pptx
Zero Defect Competition  @ July 22.pptxZero Defect Competition  @ July 22.pptx
Zero Defect Competition @ July 22.pptx
sonutyagi20
 
c-130 CV Attique
c-130 CV Attiquec-130 CV Attique
c-130 CV Attique
malik attique
 
TYPE OF WORLD CLASS MAINTENANCE.pptx
TYPE OF WORLD CLASS MAINTENANCE.pptxTYPE OF WORLD CLASS MAINTENANCE.pptx
TYPE OF WORLD CLASS MAINTENANCE.pptx
IsmailJulaihi
 
Airworthiness Management Camo
Airworthiness Management CamoAirworthiness Management Camo
Airworthiness Management Camo
S P Singh
 
resume Jennifer Hall 01-2017a
resume Jennifer Hall 01-2017aresume Jennifer Hall 01-2017a
resume Jennifer Hall 01-2017a
Jennifer Hall
 
Introduction to maintenance
Introduction to maintenanceIntroduction to maintenance
Introduction to maintenance
Dr. Munthear Alqaderi
 
Work Project 1-latest
Work Project 1-latestWork Project 1-latest
Work Project 1-latest
Ranjit David
 
Best Practices in Maintenance and Reliability
Best Practices in Maintenance and ReliabilityBest Practices in Maintenance and Reliability
Best Practices in Maintenance and Reliability
Ricky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Aircraft maintenance programme
Aircraft maintenance programmeAircraft maintenance programme
Aircraft maintenance programme
S P Singh
 
Producción inspeccionada de aeronaves
Producción inspeccionada de aeronavesProducción inspeccionada de aeronaves
Producción inspeccionada de aeronaves
Christian Meneses Montes
 
6 Essential Fleet Metrics You Should Be Watching and Why
6 Essential Fleet Metrics You Should Be Watching and Why 6 Essential Fleet Metrics You Should Be Watching and Why
6 Essential Fleet Metrics You Should Be Watching and Why
Fleetio
 
JC- webinar presentation
JC- webinar presentationJC- webinar presentation
JC- webinar presentation
Jim Cox, CPIM
 
Apac 2015 minimizing integrity failure r02
Apac 2015 minimizing integrity failure r02Apac 2015 minimizing integrity failure r02
Apac 2015 minimizing integrity failure r02
BhaveshShukla15
 

Similar to M&E Key Performance Indicators 2016 (20)

MRM April 2015 ufl
MRM April 2015 uflMRM April 2015 ufl
MRM April 2015 ufl
 
Master review Dept performance.pptx
Master review Dept performance.pptxMaster review Dept performance.pptx
Master review Dept performance.pptx
 
Planned Maintenance.
Planned Maintenance.Planned Maintenance.
Planned Maintenance.
 
Production Performance Results Internet Sample
Production Performance Results   Internet SampleProduction Performance Results   Internet Sample
Production Performance Results Internet Sample
 
Optimization of preventive maintenance to reduce maintenance costs and increa...
Optimization of preventive maintenance to reduce maintenance costs and increa...Optimization of preventive maintenance to reduce maintenance costs and increa...
Optimization of preventive maintenance to reduce maintenance costs and increa...
 
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
 
USCG R&D Center’s Analysis of Standard Boat Asset Project Office (APO’s) Met...
USCG R&D Center’s Analysis of Standard Boat Asset Project Office (APO’s) Met...USCG R&D Center’s Analysis of Standard Boat Asset Project Office (APO’s) Met...
USCG R&D Center’s Analysis of Standard Boat Asset Project Office (APO’s) Met...
 
Zero Defect Competition @ July 22.pptx
Zero Defect Competition  @ July 22.pptxZero Defect Competition  @ July 22.pptx
Zero Defect Competition @ July 22.pptx
 
c-130 CV Attique
c-130 CV Attiquec-130 CV Attique
c-130 CV Attique
 
TYPE OF WORLD CLASS MAINTENANCE.pptx
TYPE OF WORLD CLASS MAINTENANCE.pptxTYPE OF WORLD CLASS MAINTENANCE.pptx
TYPE OF WORLD CLASS MAINTENANCE.pptx
 
Airworthiness Management Camo
Airworthiness Management CamoAirworthiness Management Camo
Airworthiness Management Camo
 
resume Jennifer Hall 01-2017a
resume Jennifer Hall 01-2017aresume Jennifer Hall 01-2017a
resume Jennifer Hall 01-2017a
 
Introduction to maintenance
Introduction to maintenanceIntroduction to maintenance
Introduction to maintenance
 
Work Project 1-latest
Work Project 1-latestWork Project 1-latest
Work Project 1-latest
 
Best Practices in Maintenance and Reliability
Best Practices in Maintenance and ReliabilityBest Practices in Maintenance and Reliability
Best Practices in Maintenance and Reliability
 
Aircraft maintenance programme
Aircraft maintenance programmeAircraft maintenance programme
Aircraft maintenance programme
 
Producción inspeccionada de aeronaves
Producción inspeccionada de aeronavesProducción inspeccionada de aeronaves
Producción inspeccionada de aeronaves
 
6 Essential Fleet Metrics You Should Be Watching and Why
6 Essential Fleet Metrics You Should Be Watching and Why 6 Essential Fleet Metrics You Should Be Watching and Why
6 Essential Fleet Metrics You Should Be Watching and Why
 
JC- webinar presentation
JC- webinar presentationJC- webinar presentation
JC- webinar presentation
 
Apac 2015 minimizing integrity failure r02
Apac 2015 minimizing integrity failure r02Apac 2015 minimizing integrity failure r02
Apac 2015 minimizing integrity failure r02
 

M&E Key Performance Indicators 2016

  • 1. C.O. No. Corporate Objectives 1 Create a focus on customers as "king" by 1Q of 2015 2 Develop an empowered competent workforce by end of 2015 3 Improve operational performance 4 Reduce cost (2.5% based on CASK and controllable costs) while improving operational efficiency every year starting 2015 5 Accelerate growth in sales/revenue by 10% every year (RASK) considering the challenges in the industry 6 Build a culture of corporate social responsibility (including environmental accountability) by 2015 Page 1
  • 2. M&E KPI MAINTENANCE & ENGINEERING 2016 TARGET 97% 96.17% 92.40% A.1. DEPARTMENTAL OBJECTIVES – AIRCRAFT AIRWORTHINESS Perceived grade 75% Divisions Driver Measures Weight Rating Rating MCC Coordination and troubleshooting 15% 13% 9% LINE MAINT. Certification of aircraft released to service from line check 15% 14% 14% BASE MAINT. Certification of aircraft released to service from minor and heavy check 10% 10% 10% GSE Availability of equipment to support line & base operations 10% 10% 10% TechPlan Ensure availability of all maintenance resources 10% 10% 10% FTM Aircraft reliability 10% 10% 10% SHOP Availability of serviceable aircraft tools & equipment 10% 10% 10% Tech Training Availability of certifying personnel 10% 10% 10% Q&S Data integrity, audit & safety measures 10% 9% 9% Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade 3 On-time FFO Delays due to coordination. (Base - Actual delay) Base 10% 3 2 83% 5 2 90% 3 Minimize consequential flight disruption due to AOG Aircraft Technical disruption timely coordination (Base - total number of disruption) Base 30% 40 33 79% 99 38 90% 3 Monitor the recurring remark per aircraft type Closure of workable open recurring remark (Base - Actual Open) Base 15% 11 10 77% 11 9 80% 3 Monitor the Class 2 Fault per Q400 aircraft Closure of workable open class 2 fault (Base - Actual Open) Base 30% 5 1 95% 5 2 90% 3 Monitor the Airman Fault per aircraft type Closure of workable open Airman fault (Base - Actual Open) Base 10 2 95% 10 4 90% 3 Average open workable MEL 2 per aircraft (MEL/HIL) Closure of workable open HIL/MEL (Base - Actual Open) Base 10% 0.082 0 100% 0.082 0 100% 3 On-time submission of reportable events to CAAP Within 3 days or 72 hours upon discovery No delayed report 5% 0.082 0 100% 0.082 2 -510% A.1.2 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – Line Aircraft Maintenance Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade 3 On-time arrival/dispatch crew Delays due to awaiting crew (Base - Actual Delay) Base 35% 1 1 75% 1 0 100% 3 No delay due to documentation (AML, CML, NRC) delays due to documentation. (Base - Actual Delay) Base 30% 2 0 100% 2 1 88% 3 Flight Mechanic Availability delayed or cancelled flight due to flight mechanic unavailability (Base - Actual Delay) Base 20% 1 0 100% 1 0 100% 3 Correct & complete documentation of task deferment. Not more than 1 incorrect/incomplete documentation of deferment (Base - Actual Delay) Base 15% 2 0 100% 2 0 100% A.1.3 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – Base - Aircraft Maintenance Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade 3 On-time towing (R1 Hangar to Terminal) crew Delays due to unavailability of towing crew (Base - Actual Delay) Base 15% 1 0 100% 1 0 100% December 2015 A.1.1 DIVISIONS OBJECTIVES – Maintenance Control Center (MCC) November 2015 December 2015 Objective Manages and control aircraft serviceability Manages the aircraft maintenance in line and outstation Supports in establishing quality & safety within M&E Administers training to ensure personnel competency Grade Grade 94.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% November 2015 November 2015 December 2015 December 2015November 2015 Perform component maintenance certification and ensure adequate facility to support maintenance Monitors and control technical & engineering support Manages the maintenance task forecasting, compliance & control Manages the GSSD operations Manages the compliance of base maintenance activities 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 90.25% 100.00% 59.57% 96.25% 100.00% 100.00% 87.24% 91.25% Page 2
  • 3. M&E KPI 3 No delay due to documentation (AML, CML, NRC) delays due to documentation. (Base - Actual Delay) Base 35% 1 0 100% 1 0 100% 3 Correct & complete documentation of task deferment. Not more than 1 incorrect/incomplete documentation of deferment (Base - Actual Delay) Base 30% 2 0 100% 2 0 100% 3 On-time check output per planned resources L-Check A-Check Late aircraft maintenance release due to unavailability /lack of manpower skill resources and poor routine task compliance planning /phasing Total number of routine checks-Total number of late aircraft output Total number of routine checks 20% 1 0 100% 1 0 100% A.1.4 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – Ground Support Services (GSE) Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade 3 On-time spotting for long towing Delays due to late spotting (Base - Actual Delay) Base 25% 1 0 100% 1 0 100% 3 On-time rectification of unserviceable equipment Not more than 3 days repair (Base - Actual Delay) Base 25% 1 0 100% 1 0 100% 3 Preventive maintenance implementation Done within specified interval Total number of maint. Event - total number of deferred maint Total number of maint. Event 25% 1 0 100% 1 0 100% 3 Availability of ground equipment during scheduled base maintenance Equipment serviceability (Base - Actual Delay) Base 25% 1 0 100% 1 0 100% A.1.5 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – Technical Planning Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade 3 Maintenance forecast validation Delays due to last minute mainteannce forecast per month (Base - Actual Delays) Base 40% 3 0 100% 3 0 100% 3 On-time check output per planned resources L-Check A-Check Late aircraft output due to unavailability of resources (parts/material, consumable, tooling, equipment) availability from routine tasks per month Total number of routine checks-Total number of late aircraft output Total number of routine checks 25% 3 0 100% 3 0 100% Ensure all parts avaiability of critical parts Availability of stocks (Base - Actual AOG) Base 3 Zero AD overrun Zero Routine & Non-routine task Overrun 100% compliance monitoring Zero incident 35% 0 0 100% 1 0 100% A.1.6 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – Fleet Technical Management Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade 3 On-time Engineering Response Request for Engineering Service (RFES) input vs. output No overdue reply 20% 0.083 0 100% 0.083 0 100% 1 Cabin Presentability Maximum three (3) workable open Cabin Non-MEL per A/C (Base - Actual Open) Base 15% 3 0 100% 3 0 100% 3 Safe & Reliable Aircraft On-time AD Evaluation AD Evaluation Matrix: - Emergency AD = 48 hours - Compliance less than 6 months or 2000FH/FC = 10 days - Compliance is more than 6 months or 2000FH/FC = 30 days No overdue AD evaluation 20% 0.083 0 100% 0.083 0 100% 3 On-time SB Review SB Review Matrix: - Reliability Item = 3 days - Other = 30 days No overdue SB review 15% 0.083 0 100% 0.083 0 100% November 2015 December 2015 November 2015 December 2015 December 2015November 2015 Page 3
  • 4. M&E KPI 3 Technical Publication 2 Weeks upon receipt of new revision No overdue publication of new revisions 15% 0.083 0 100% 0.083 0 100% 3 Engine Condition Trend Monitoring Alert Closure (Base - Actual Open) Base 15% 0.083 0 100% 0.083 0 100% A.1.7 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – SHOP Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade TAT - 2 days Tire replacement No delayed output 1 0 100% 1 0 100% TAT - 4 days OH No delayed output 1 0 100% 1 0 100% TAT - 2 days Heat Sink replacement No delayed output 1 0 100% 1 0 100% TAT - 4 days OH No delayed output 1 0 100% 1 0 100% TAT - 2 days Normal Charging No delayed output 1 0 100% 1 0 100% TAT - 3 days OH No delayed output 1 0 100% 1 0 100% 3 Control & monitoring of tools & calibration Tools / PME serviceability Total number of tools endorsed for calibration within 30days Number of tools scheduled for calibration 10% 1 0 100% 1 0 100% 1 0 100% 1 0 100% A.1.8 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – Technical Training Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade 2 Accommodate department training requirements Tech Training in-house capability and/or availability Total Training Conducted Total Courses offerred 50% 2 0 100% 2 0 100% 2 On-time issuance of completion reports TAT - 2 days after training completion No. of on-time completion report issuance Total Training Conducted 50% 1 0 100% 1 0 100% 1.5 0 100% 1.5 0 100% A.1.9 DIVISION OBJECTIVES – Quality & Safety Reference Objective Driver Measures Outcome Measures Weight Average Actual Data Grade Average Actual Data Grade 3 Data Integrity Technical records updating, forecasting & monitoring - Aircraft Data & ENG- FH/FC - AD - Airworthiness Directive - LLP - Life Limited Parts - TCC - Time Controlled Component Base - Actual Overrun Base 40% 0.67 0 100% 0.67 0 100% 3 Zero incident/Accident -Injury to personnel in the workplace -Number of equipment causing damage or injury -Aircraft incident/accident Base - Actual incident/accident Base 15% 1 0 100% 1 1 75% 3 Safe & Reliable AIrcraft Correct, complete & certified documentation (AML, CML, NRC, MTC) Noincorrect/incomplete documentation for every a/c released to service Base - Actual incident Base 15% 2 0 100% 2 0 100% 3 Safe & Reliable Aircraft Closure of non-compliance / high risk finding Closure within 90 days Base - Actual days in-progress Base 30% 75 60 80% 75 60 80% December 2015 November 2015 December 2015 3 Positive spare for Wheels 30% 3 Positive spare for Brakes 30% 3 Positive spare for Battery 30% November 2015 November 2015 December 2015 Page 4
  • 5. M&E Running Data from 2015 FORMULA average 5 base 20 Coordination Doc Base Tow-GSE Tow-Mech Plan Equip Facility Parts Flight-Adj Bay-avail ATC perceived grade75% actual data 2 Jan 8 4 1 13 1 5 1 1 base 20 GRADE 90% Feb 10 3 1 1 6 1 2 3 2 Mar 6 2 1 1 1 1 Apr 19 5 1 1 10 3 May 2 1 2 June 1 July 2 1 1 August 8 2 2 1 September 3 6 1 October 3 1 November 1 December 1 MCC Coordination Line Coordinatio n Line Doc Base Doc TechPlan Doc Tow-GSE Tow- Mech TechPlan Equip Facility Recurring Defect (EST) Class 2 fault (EST) Jan 8 0 4 0 0 0 1 13 0 1 10 2 Feb 10 0 3 0 0 1 1 6 0 1 10 3 Mar 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 10 5 Apr 19 0 5 0 0 1 1 10 0 0 10 8 May 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 10 7 Jun 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 6 Jul 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 10 4 Aug 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 10 4 Sep 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 2 1 0 10 3 Oct 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 10 2 Nov 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 6 Dec 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 16 6 Total 55 3 14 3 1 5 8 31 7 5 132 56 Average 5 0.25 1.272727 0.25 0.0833333 0.416667 0.666667 2.583333 0.583333 0.416667 11 4.666667 Coordination Doc Base Tow-GSE Tow-Mech Plan Equip Facility CoordinationDoc Tow-GSE Tow-Mech TechPLan Equip Facility MCC 5 20 Line 0.25 1.42 1 5.68 Base 0.25 0.67 0.42 1 2.68 1.68 GSE 0.41 0.58 1.64 2.32 TechPlan 0.083 2.58 0.332 10.32 FTM 0.083 0.332 Shop July AOG average Orig Delay Delay conseq Delay canxl 3016 1 1 3017 3 14 6 3018 2 4 3020 1 4 8 3032 1 3 2 3033 2 6 3036 1 8 3227 1 6 1 8398 2 14 4 8610 1 3 TOTAL 99 AVERAGE 3.96 Accident/Incident Jan 0 Feb 1 Mar 1 Apr 0 May 2 Jun 2 Jul 2 Aug 0 Sep 3 Oct 0 Nov 0 Non-Mechanical Delay 2015 BASEAVERAGE
  • 6. Dec 1 TOTAL 12 AVERAGE 1 Maintenance task Overrun Jan 0 Feb 0 Mar 0 Apr 3 May 2 Jun 0 Jul 0 Aug 0 Sep 1 Oct 2 Nov 0 Dec 0 TOTAL 8 AVERAGE 0.67 HIGH Risk Finding Closure Jan 0 Feb 0 Mar 0 Apr 3 60 60 90 May 2 60 150 Jun 0 Jul 0 Aug 0 Sep 1 60 Oct 2 60 60 Nov 0 Dec 0 TOTAL 8 AVERAGE 75 Incorrect documentation Jan Feb Mar Apr 1 210 May Jun 1 210 Jul Aug 2 90 150 Sep 2 30 120 Oct Nov Dec TOTAL 6 AVERAGE 1.5