Major Life Events As Well As Gaps Or Discrepancies From...

Major Life Events As Well As Gaps Or Discrepancies From...
1. Basic biographical sketch, from life to death, including notable anecdotes, major life events as
well as gaps or discrepancies in the historical record Eduard Kynaston Eduard "Ned" Kynaston
achieved fame as the last of the boy–actors portraying women on the stage. Kynaston was so great
even, that not only was he highly regarded as one of the greatest boy–actor of the time, but
eventually became a standard by which all actresses succeeding him were judged against. Many
people doubted that any other performer could ever live up to Kynaston's skill as a female
impersonator. It is unknown exactly when Ned was born, however it was in the year 1640, and he
died in January of 1712. Ned didn't achieve fame until his early twenties when he began appearing
in many plays as women from 1660 and eventually in male roles as well until he retired in 1699 due
to memory loss. Kynaston 's last female role was as as Evadne in Beaumont and Fletcher 's The
Maid 's Tragedy in 1661 with Thomas Killigrew 's King 's Company. He then continued to remain a
successful actor for many years, particularly known for his portrayal of Shakespeare's Henry IV.
Kynaston led a lavish and entertaining life, known for his portrayal of women both on and offstage,
generating rumors and gossip about his sexuality, including an affair in his thirties with the 2nd
Duke of Buckingham, George Villiers. Despite his affairs with men, Ned eventually married and
fathered six children, confirming popular belief that
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Tudor Family Research Paper
The Tudor Family is a line of Kings and powerful Queens . The Tudor Dynasty starts with Henry
VII . Henry VIII created the Protestant Church of England so he could divorce his first wife
Catherine of Aragon , who was Catholic . He created his own church because the Pope refused to
annul the marriage . Henry had Parliament pass laws ending the power of the Pope in England. In
1534 the Act of Supremacy names the King Henry as the head of the Church of England . After
Henry's death and his son Edward's short reign , his daughter Mary I became Queen. Mary made
England Catholic again . When Mary died, Elizabeth was crowned queen and returned England to
Protestant. Queen Elizabeth, like her father Henry had a good relationship with Parliament.
Elizabeth I died in 1603 and a relative of the Tudors from Scotland became King . James I was the
first member of the Stuart dynasty to rule England . ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
James had a hard time getting along with Parliament . James spent his money toward the military
and started to run low on money. James would ask Parliament for money but they would never grant
his request. During that time a group called the Puritans formed. The Puritans are a group of strict
Calvinists that demanded that the Church of England be reformed. The Puritans goal was to take
power away from the church officials. James saw this as a threat to his power since the church
supported him and refused to pass the Puritans request for reform. King James faced many problems
during his reign with Parliament unlike the Tudor Family who made sure they had a good
relationship with Parliament . When James died his younger son Charles I was crowned king ,
whose conflict with Parliament would led to the english civil war and his own

The Glorious Revolution : The Glorious Revolution
The Glorious Revolution or the "Revolution of 1688" took place in England in November of 1688
and didn't end until the end of 1689. James II was king between 1685–1688 until he was dethroned
by his son–in–law and daughter. The revolution was led William of Orange, the husband of Mary II,
who was asked to take action to stop the king from changing the country's entire religious
preference. Charles II was king originally until his death in 1685, that's when King James inherited
the throne, adopting Catholicism. In 1685, England was a Protestant country so having a king that is
Catholic would bring about some problems (Amy Troolin). Back then, there were laws and
regulations that were set to keep those who practiced other religions from holding high positions,
such as being king. Once King James II held the throne, he changed them, creating the "Declaration
of Indulgence" to accommodate him and his supporters so they too could hold high positions and
practice catholicism is private. (The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica.) Parliament, Anglican
Bishops and other Englishman grew furious because they wanted all of England to be "unified" with
religions, meaning they only wanted people to practice protestantism (Amy Troolin). They reached
out to William of Orange, who was ready to replace his uncle and father–in–law as king. His wife,
Mary II, who was also the daughter of King James II was torn to pick sides between her husband
and her father (Ana Papa). Unfortunately, after

The Causes Of The American Revolution And The English...
The English Revolution from 1640 to 1660 Although the English Revolution began in 1640, there
was discontent and conflict during the Stuart dynasty which lasted between 1603 and 1640.
Between 1603 and 1625 King James I ruled England. He was unsuccessful in unifying Scotland and
England, there was steep religious division between the Church of England, which was "Anglo–
Catholic", and the Protestant Nonconformists, political division between the crown and parliament
consistently disagreeing over the constitution, fiscal policy, taxation, religious policy, and foreign
policy, and England's beginning colonization of North America and the Caribbean. In 1625, King
James I dies and King Charles succeeds him. King Charles begins his reign with lack of money,
religious disagreement and a European war, the Thirty Years' War which King James I attempted to
keep out of. From 1629 to 1640, King Charles I tries to rule without parliament and raises revenue
outside of Parliament through his prerogative powers. This revenue was mainly through customs
taxation, granting monopolies, and "ship money." This not only irritated parliament, but also many
of his subjects. Parliament and the landed elite that it represents see his actions as the exercise of
"arbitrary power", a power which threatens their personal liberties and private property. He adopted
a non–Calvinist, ritualistic form of Protestantism that seemed to have similarities to Catholicism.
This infuriated radical reformers, such

Charles Town Settlers
Title of Your Report The first explorers of modern–day South Carolina were the Spanish. The first
successful settlement made there by the was led by Lucas Vazquez de Ayllón, but there settlement
did not last because of the bad weather, shortage of food and hostility of the natives. Later on in
1292 King Charles I gave Sir Robert Heath grant to settle in the area below the Virginia colony.
Although his attempt to settle was not successful it sparked the British's interest in the area. The
attempt was later renewed in 1663 by King Charles II who awarded Eight loyal supporters a charter
to start a colony in Carolina, these men were given the title Lord Proprietors. Their colony was
succesfull but relied on their relationship with the natives. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The Spanish were the first to settle here but they their settlement did not last. This was because of
the natives shortage of food, bad weather and the hostile natives. Sir Robert Heath was the first
Englishman to settle in Charles town. Although his settlement did not work out it sparked the
British's interest in Charles town. King Charles II rewarded eight of his loyal supporters to go and
settle in Charles Town. Their settlement worked out and they started a colony called Called South
Carolina. That settlement from Three–Hundred and Fifty–Three years ago is what we live in

Henry Viii Influence
Literature has become the most important factor in the construction of the English monarchy. It has
become the way in which people communicate and share their ideas throughout the world. English
literature is the essential piece in ruling a country and determining the future for that country. In
England, English literature has evolved through a number of versions due to the changes made to
the policies and laws, religion, culture, and the monarchy. Henry VIII was born on June 28, 1491 by
Elizabeth of York and Henry VII at Greenwich Palace (BBC News). In his early age, he was very
interested in the arts and enjoyed reading literature. In 1509, Henry VIII succeeded his father Henry
VII (1457–1509), but had originally become heir to the throne after his older brother, Prince Arthur,
died in 1502 (Henry VIII (r.1509–1547)). He reigned during the House of Tudor monarchy when he
was only eighteen years old until he died in 1547, having Edward VI succeed him. Throughout his
years of reign, he married six women including: Catherine of Aragon, Anne Boleyn, Jane Seymour,
Anne of Cleves, Catherine Howard, and Catherine Parr. In 1527, Henry divorced Catherine of
Aragon, since she could no longer conceive children, and became infatuated with Anne Boleyn
(Henry's Divorce). This decision led to the English Protestant Reformation which were "a series of
events...[in] which the Church of England broke away from the authority of the Pope and the
Roman Catholic Church" (English Reformation).

What Were The Causes Of The American Revolutions
A revolution, as defined in the Merriam Webster dictionary, is the violent attempt by many people to
end the rule of one government to start a new one. In 1640, the long parliament was found and was
followed by the short parliament which followed a 11–year absence. Two revolutions in 1642–1660
and 1688–1689, overturned two kings and confirmed the constitutional powers of an elected
parliament, laying the foundation for the idea that government must guarantee certain rights to the
people under the law. The first was the English revolution which was introduced by Marxist
historians, where parliament challenged King Charles I's authority. Although, Parliament interfered
in civil conflict against his forces, King Charles I was executed in 1649. The second was the
Glorious revolution which supporters of the parliament announced because it was achieved with
little bloodshed. In this revolution, King James II of England was removed from power by a group
of English Parliamentarians with William of Orange. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some historians view this war as the last great religion because it pitted Puritans against those trying
to push the Church of England toward Catholicism. The English Civil War between Charles I and
Parliament took place from 1642–1646 and divided the country. The king's army known as the
Cavaliers were supporting northern and western England. Parliament's forces were known as the
Roundheads who defended southeast including London. The parliament did not intend revolution
but the reformers in the House of Commons wanted to undo what they saw. The civil war between
king and Parliament ended in victory for Parliament, the Presbyterians dominated Parliament but the
Independents controlled the

The Economic Causes Of The First Anglo-Dutch War
In the seventeenth century, overseas trade was vital for the European countries as the circulation of
currency and commodities allowed nations to function. Rommelse claims in his article that this
interdependence of nations caused by necessary trading lead to a rise in economic influence in
politics which in turn lead to economic conflicts becoming wars between nations. I agree with his
point, and believe this fact is best exemplified in Anglo–Dutch relations. The first two Anglo–Dutch
Wars were dominated by economic conflict, but after the treaty of Breda in 1667, economic interests
showed a less prevalent effect in Anglo–Dutch political relationships and the third Anglo–Dutch war
was unique as its cause was purely political. The English Civil War began the conflict that would
lead to the first Anglo–Dutch war. The Parliamentary forces were largely protestant, and the
parliamentary forces reached out for an alliance with the Dutch Republic to form a bond with the
only protestant nation. Rommelse states that the Dutch republic realized that an alliance with
England would allow for English aggression in claiming previously Dutch–only trading routes. This
fact is further supported by an article written by J.E. Farnell. The protestant forces now in control of
England were angry at the rejection of an alliance, and in 1651 passed the Navigation Acts with the
sole purpose of hurting Dutch trade with the rest of Europe. By limiting who could carry English
goods or

Incredible British and French Revolution
Introduction The middle of the sixteenth century through the eighteenth century was the beginning
of Europe's two incredible revolutions which are the British and French Revolutions. The British
Revolution is very different from the French Revolution. Many different events and issues led up to
the British and French Revolutions that make them different from one another. For example the
primary factor that led to the British Revolution was the power of religion. While, the French
Revolution was based upon feudalism as well as the inequality of the third estate. There are many
different aspects of the British and French Revolutions that make one stand out from the other and
together they are both marked as important events that occurred in European history. Background of
the British Revolution In order to depict the differences between the British Revolution and French
Revolution it is important to understand the background information and why the British Revolution
occurred. The British Revolution occurred in England from 1640 to1660. Author Michael Richard's
explains the origins of the British Revolution by showing that "The policies followed by Charles I
and his advisors in the 1620's particularly in the arena of foreign affairs produced some tension and
opposition." In other words, the people in England were unhappy with King Charles I and the
policies he was enforcing. Another circumstance that occurred in the British Revolution was the
consent of

Why Have Interpretations of Oliver Cromwell Changed over...
Oliver Cromwell was born in 25 April 1599. Cromwell Died on 3 September 1658. He rose from
fairly humble beginnings to become the most victorious military and political leader of the Civil
Wars, who was part of the joint republican, military and parliamentarian effort that caused the
downfall of the Stuart monarchy as a result of the English Civil War, and was consequently invited
by his associate leaders to assume a head of state role in 1653. As such, Cromwell ruled as "Lord
Protector" for a five–year segment (1653–58) of the 11–year period of Republican Commonwealth
and settlement rule of England, and technically of Ireland, Wales and Scotland. As one of the
commanders of the New Model Army, he played an essential role in the defeat of ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
By contrast, by the 1930's and 1940's many historians thought Cromwell was a cruel military
dictator. This was because in the 1930s and 1940s most scholars saw him as a treacherous dictator,
along the lines of Mussolini, Stalin and Hitler. In recent decades nearly all the scholars have been
favourable. During his lifetime, some areas painted him as a fraud encouraged by power – for
example, The Machiavellian Cromwell and The Juglers Discovered, both part of an attack on
Cromwell by the Levellers after 1647; present him as a Machiavellian figure. After his death and
public humiliation there were many accusations and a few encouraging descriptions, such as John
Spittlehouse 's A Warning Piece Discharged which compared him to Moses, rescuing the English by
taking them securely through the Red Sea of the civil wars.[8] The great royalist historian Edward
Hyde, 1st Earl of Clarendon, in his History of the Rebellion and Civil Wars in England (1667)
acknowledged that Cromwell "will be looked ahead by posterity as a brave bad man". Clarendon
argued that Cromwell 's rise to power had been helped not only by his Great Spirit and energy, but
also by his brutality. The nobility was particularly argumentative to Cromwell, in large part because
of his well–built request to the ordinary yeoman. Today most historians see Cromwell as a troubled
and complicated

The Stuart Monarchy And The Tudor Monarchy
The Stuart monarchy is equally matched to the Tudor Monarchy in tumultuous affairs. The Stuart
monarchy began with James I who succeeded the throne from Elizabeth I. However, the eventual
successor that would experience the highest degree of failures would be his son, Charles I. Charles's
reign can be considered one of the biggest failures in the Stuart monarch. Under Charles I, the
relationship between the crown and Parliament would further descend. Although it does appear that
Charles inherited the conflict with Parliament from his father, he does nothing to improve the
relationship. Moreover, his reign resulted in further dissension between the crown and Parliament.
During Charles's reign a few key components were becoming more and more visible. Components
that were detrimental to the crown. Religion, Finances, and Politics were beyond divided. In religion
many began to oppose Charles because of his wife Henrietta. She was a devout Roman Catholic,
and this affected Charles severely. Parliament contained many members who were highly Protestant.
They wanted to reduce Roman Catholic influence in politics, and having a Catholic queen
threatened this. Charles vehemently avoid all attempts to persuade him to convert to a Roman
Catholic. Charles openly supported the Church of England, but his claims fell on deaf ears, mostly
in part to his own wife and mother. The people feared Charles's attempts towards religious toleration
because it further exacerbated fears that the Roman

Research Paper : Aphra Behn
Maia Davis
Orlando/4A
English 2302
Research Paper: Aphra Behn
In a time when very few authors – let alone female authors – could support themselves through their
craft, Aphra Behn was a well known and highly regarded writer in London. She wrote many plays
for the London stage, penned poetry, and wrote what some consider the first English novel (though
others consider it a novella or a somewhat long short story). Much of her work decries the unequal
treatment of women in her era, and she suffered the consequences of these claims by enduring harsh
criticism and even arrest.
Aphra Behn, one of the most influential dramatists of the late seventeenth century, was also a
celebrated poet and novelist. Her contemporary reputation was founded primarily on her
"scandalous" plays, which she claimed would not have been criticized for impropriety had a man
written them. Behn 's assertion of her unique role in English literary history is confirmed not only
by the extraordinary circumstances of her writings, but by those of her life history as well.
Not much is known about the early life of Aphra Behn; one scholar describes the author as having
"a lethal combination of obscurity, secrecy and staginess, which makes her an uneasy fit for any
narrative, speculative or factual" (Todd 1). Best estimates place Behn 's birth in Kent, on December
14th of 1640. She was born to Elizabeth Denham and Bartholomew Johnson; it is believed that her
father was a barber. Because her mother cared for

Absolutism and Constitutionalism Essay
1. Why did monarchs in the late 16th/early 17th centuries need new sources of income? Why did
monarchs wish to get their income without the permission of the nobility? 2. Explain the role that
each of the following played in the failure of England achieving absolutism, as well as the success
of the French: England France · Religion – Religion · Parliament/Tradition – Estates General ·
Personalities of Leaders – Personalities of Leaders · Trust of Nobility – Trust of nobility 3. Henry
IV came to the throne and helped to end ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Summarize the many religious complaints that were raised against King James I. In defending the
episcopacy, what did James mean when he retorted "No bishops, no king (pg. 452)."– James viewed
the proposal to replace bishops with presbyteries as an attempt to diminish his power in the church
so he quoted that. 3. What actions led Parliament force Charles I to accept the Petition of Right?
How would Charles I have attempted to defend himself and his actions? What freedoms did the
Petition guarantee?–disputes between Parliament and King Charles I over the execution of the
Thirty Years' War, Parliament refused to grant subsidies to support the war effort, leading to Charles
gathering "forced loans" without Parliamentary approval and arbitrarily imprisoning those who
refused to pay. The Petition guaranteed restrictions on non–Parliamentary taxation, forced billeting
of soldiers, imprisonment without cause, and restricts the use of martial law. 4. Why did Parliament
not meet between 1629 and 1640? Describe the circumstances that required their meeting in 1640.–
The Triennial Act was intended to prevent kings from ruling without Parliament, as Charles had
done between 1629–1640. The act required that Parliament meet for at least a fifty–day session once
every three years. 5. Create a timeline using the following terms, explaining what each is and how
the terms relate to one–another. · Short Parliament

The Major Causes Of The Glorious Revolution
Major Causes of the Glorious Revolution of 1688 The Glorious Revolution of 1688 was the
successful invasion of England by the Dutch Republic lead by William of Orange. William of
Orange's invasion of England was in large part due to the political division occurring in England
from the periods before. The English nobles were uneasy with the current monarchy, King James II,
during the time before the Glorious Revolution. This uneasiness began during the Restoration period
of England between 1660 and 1688. King Charles II ruled from 1660 to 1685, when he dies and his
brother James II succeeds him and rules until 1688. From 1660 to 1667, King Charles II rules with
his leading minister Edward Hyde and the Cavalier Parliament under an Anglican–Royalist
consensus. This period of time restored the natural political and social order for England. The
Clarendon Code is passed during this time and secures the Church of England's supremacy over the
country's religious life, by making it difficult for people from other religions to hold their own
churches. The Clarendon Code consisted of the Corporation Act of 1661, the Act of Uniformity of
1662, the Conventicle Act of 1664, and the Five Mile Act of 1665.
Then from 1665 to 1667, the second Anglo–Dutch War is fought and the Dutch were victorious.
This War was caused by King Charles II's hate of the Dutch politics and its housing of former
English radicals and exiles and for an increase of England's naval development and revenue.
From

United States Political Thought As A Democracy
United States political thought today as of today is considered a democracy. A democracy is where
the citizens of the United States are eligible to vote for the leaders that represent the country.
Without the drafting of the British documents, such as The Magna Carta and the Petition of Rights
along with the political upheaval of the Glorious Revolution and Enlightenment, America today
would be following the traditional acts of arbitrary monarchical rule. All of these specific times in
history were outcomes of people seeing that absolute monarchies were trouble for the fundamental
rights of the people. Being under an absolute monarchy is similar to being under a dictatorship
which leaves no say in the hand of the people.
The Magna Carta, also known as The Great Charter, was the first step into people receiving the
rights that they deserved. The King of England, King John was forced by his barons to sign the
charter to establish that the monarch was no longer absolute and that the people were guaranteed a
trial by jury and due process of law. King John is considered to be one of the worst kings in history.
He was not in favor of the people, he was in favor of himself. He was such a greedy King who
would penalize any baron who went against his wishes.
In 1206, King John lost some land that he was insistent on getting back. Normandy, Anjou, Maine
and parts of Poitou were no longer under his control. The way he went about it was to harshly raise
the taxes. If the people

The Importance of Samuel Pepys Diary
The Importance of Samuel Pepys Diary
Imagine witnessing one of the most defining points in the history of England and living to speak of
it, Samuel Pepys did just that. Samuel Pepys kept a diary while major events in history went on
throughout his life. Pepys began writing his dairy on January 1, 1660 and concluded it in 1669. The
diary contained Samuel Pepys inner most personal thoughts and was only intended for personal
keeping but went on to become famous. Samuel Pepys diary is one of the most important pieces of
literature in England's history because it tells descriptive information about the coronation of King
Charles II, detailed crucial events in history, and outlined how people lived in mid–17th century
England.
Samuel Pepys wrote about many important things in his diary and one of those items happened to be
about King Charles II coronation. Pepys started writing April 22, 1661, the day before the
coronation. He wrote about the King's procession Ye Tower to White Hall which is where the
coronation was to be held. Pepys was very excited for this day writing, "it is impossible to relate the
glory of this day" (Samuel Pepys). He wrote about the party in the streets and the excitement of the
day. The following day was the coronation. The coronation day it–self was a very glorious and
special day for all the people in England. Pepys wrote his observations on how many people were
there, praised the king and how marvelous he looked, and took into account the order in

Charles I Assassination
"Charles I of England and Scotland Authorizes Sunday Recreations (1633)" Charles I of England
and Scotland is the son of James I. He faced criticisms and suspicions due to his more Catholic way
of ruling. He was an Anglican and to the Puritan English people, this was not a good thing.
Parliament and Charles I argued often which caused Charles to shut down parliament for long
periods of time. This later caused a civil war between the two parties. Charles I lost and was
executed showing a huge shift of the people who no longer believed the King was chosen by God.
The primary source was first written by James I who wished to have it read by the clergy in public,
but "but so strong was the Puritan opposition to Sunday amusements that he prudently withdrew his
command" (The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica). Charles I, James I's son, agreed with his father
and revisited his idea nearly fifteen years later and forced the clergy to read the text aloud. The
clergy were still not open to the idea, so when they refused, they were punished. The document is
basically a list of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Puritans in this time did not want this particular law revoked as it offered them more time to pray
and read the bible. Catholics and Anglicans in this time were beginning to be less strict about
keeping Sundays free to focus only on God. They saw the benefit in allowing recreation as a relief
to the mind, body, and soul during a time when people were constantly working possibly brutal jobs
to provide for themselves and their families as well as for their community, religion, and
government. These people needed a break to relax and enjoy life rather than constant work. This law
was supposed to be a way for the people to find this relief–yet some did not like it as it seemed to
take away from God. People, as well as being incredibly hard–working, are also very faithful and
curious at this

Charles II Dbq Essay
"The reign of Charles II and the revolution against his brother James show that England in the later
seventeenth century was ready to be Tory and Anglican but not Roman Catholic and Francophile."
Discuss.
It is not wrong to assume that the consequence of the reigns of Charles and James II was to lead
England to be Tory –for some time, at least– and Anglican rather than Francophile and Catholic.
Both Charles and James II had sympathies for Catholicism, and England had had a tense and
problematic relationship with Roman Catholicism since the reign of Henry VIII. This tendency and
the relationship of Charles with Louis XIV contributed greatly to the ever–increasing hostility
towards France and Catholicism.
At first, Charles was willing to implement ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Danby was pro–Dutch, anti–French, and anti–Catholic who sought to strengthen the Commons'
loyalty to the King. To accomplish his objectives, he concentrated his efforts in the House of
Commons. The Commons were divided into the Court party, which supported the King, and the
Country party, which normally opposed the Crown. Later, the Court party was called Tory, and the
Country party, Whig. He sought the loyalty of the Court party by giving them pensions, offices, and
payments in cash.
To worsen the situation of Catholics, rumors about a Popish Plot started to be spread. Oates and
Tonge, the ones who invented the plot, affirmed that a group of Jesuits were planning to kill the
King and place in his place his Catholic brother, James. Thereupon these declarations, a wave of
false accusations against Catholics were made, and many were punished and killed. The Commons
passed a bill hardening the Test Act. In response to this supposed Popish Plot, the Whigs started a
plot to prevent James from becoming the new King when Charles died. When this conspiracy was
brought to light, it ruined the Whig

The English Restoration Period Women
In the English Restoration period women were finally allowed to be on stage. These women defined
their day with their stage abilities and what they wore. Most of them also had personal affairs that
helped them to further their success as actresses. Eleanor "Nell" Gwynn is arguably the most
memorable actresses from this time period. She alone changed the perspectives of so many people
by challenging what was acceptable for a woman to do in the era and creating a new standard. The
mark she has made on theatre is a large topic in this era. Her personal and professional success are
clear markers that anything is possible. Nell Gwynn has shaped in era and created opportunity for
women to live freely both on and off stage. Samuel Pepys called her 'pretty witty Nell' –he called
her 'a bold merry slut' as well, but oddly enough both of these describe Gwynn and she knew it.
While there is not a lot of information on Gwynn's early life, but what we do know helps us to
understand her and how that helped her to change the theatre. After her father had died in prison
where he was kept to pay his debt. Nell and her sister Rose were brought up poor, living in a brothel
that their mother owned. Their mother was an alcoholic and had many gentlemen callers. The sisters
would serve customers food and drink while their mother and the women of the brothel would give
them what they came for. This part of her life helped to define her professional life in the theatre and
would

The English Civil War: A War Between 1642-1649
The English Civil War was a war between Charles I and the Parliament, it took place between the
years 1642 – 1649. The nobility and supporters of the king called themselves Cavaliers, and the
Parliament and their supporters called themselves Roundheads. The Roundheads were for Puritan
domination, otherwise known as the pilgrims. They built up their forces and then met for their first
battle called Edge Hill in 1642. The result of that battle was undefined for both parties claimed they
had won. They continued battling regularly, for example, in 1645, the outcome again was not clear.
No real changes were made until Oliver Cromwell became general of the Parliament in 1944. He
lead the battle of Marston Moor and defeated Charles the I. Another battle took place in 1645 in
which Charles I was defeated. Charles I fled in 1647 to the Scottish in hopes to find shelter, but was
sold to the Parliament. Charles I was beheaded in 1649 which was the end of the English Civil War.
The Parliament made a stand and won showing that with determination they would be able to
control the monarchy ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This lead to the rise of his brother, King James the II. King James II was an absolute monarch and
believed in his divine right to rule. He was catholic and the Parliament completely hated him. They
feared that if his line would continue to rule the monarchy would undo everything the Parliament
had worked for and stain it with Catholic blood. This gave rise to the first two political parties, the
Tories and the Whigs. The Tories believed that James II had the right to rule and so would his heir,
and the Whigs supported the Parliament in their belief that James II was to be taken down. In the
end, they decided to permanently remove him in 1688. The government is trying to remove
unhealthy, and bad rulers from monarchy, which is a right we have in today's modern

The British Government : Constitutional Monarchy
The current British government is a constitutional monarchy, where the monarch is the Head of
State, but only Parliament has the ability to make laws. This distribution of power originated during
the reign of the Stuarts. While absolute monarchs ruled the rest of Europe, the English Parliament
slowly forced the kings and queens to relinquish much of their power. However, limits on the power
of the monarchy were in place far before the Stuart dynasty. In 1215, King John signed the Magna
Carta and agreed to consult the Great Council, which later became Parliament, before raising taxes,
effectively giving Parliament the power of the purse. The conditions of the Magna Carta came into
conflict during the Stuart monarchy. Before the Stuarts, the Tudor family had good relations with
Parliament. When Henry VIII wanted to break away from the Catholic Church, Parliament passed
the Act of Supremacy and because of the many wars, he had to consult Parliament regularly to raise
taxes. After the Tudors, there were six Stuart monarchs, reigning from 1603 to 1714. James I did not
associate well with Parliament, unlike his Tudor predecessors. James, like many absolute rulers at
the time, believed he had a God given divine right to rule and thus did not appreciate Parliament's
role in his government. James and Parliament were in constant conflict over taxes and who had the
right to levy them. Parliament passed the Great Protestation, declaring it had freedom of speech and
superiority in

Comparison Of The Restoration Colonies
Proprietorship– also known as Restoration Colonies, the Carolina and Jersey grantees, the Duke of
York, and William Penn owned all the land in their new colonies and could rule them as they
wished, provided that their laws conformed broadly with that of England's. (1660s)
Quakers– those who condemned extravagance, sought to restore Christianity to its early simple
spirituality; William Penn made Pennsylvania a refuge for his fellow Quakers who refused to pay
taxes or serve in the military for the Church of England.
Navigation Acts– During the reign of Charles II, these acts were devised to allow English control of
colonial trade. The Navigation Act of 1651 required hat goods be carried on ships owned by English
or Colonial merchants. Later on, the acts kept the British sugar trade in hands of British merchants.
Dominion of New England– An attempt for James II to gain stricter control over New England. A
new royal province created in 1686 after the Lord of Trade revoked the charters of Connecticut and
Rhode Island and merged them together with Massachusetts Bay and Plymouth and eventually
creating a vast colony stretching from Maine to Pennsylvania. (1680s)
Glorious Revolution– In 1688, William of Orange lead a quick and bloodless coup and overthrew
James II in order to prevent having a Catholic heir to the English throne.
Middle Passage– the perilous journey to the new World by African slaves in which they suffered
from disease and death. They had little to nothing to eat or

United States Political Thought Today Is Considered A...
United States political thought today is considered a democracy. A democracy is where the citizens
of the United States are eligible to vote for the leaders that represent their country. Without the
drafting of the British documents, such as The Magna Carta and the Petition of Rights along with
the political upheaval of the Glorious Revolution and Enlightenment, America today would be
following the traditional acts of arbitrary monarchical rule. All of these specific times in history
were outcomes of people seeing that absolute monarchies were troubling for the fundamental rights
of the people. Being under an absolute monarchy is similar to being under a dictatorship which
leaves no say in the hand of the people.
The Magna Carta, also known as The Great Charter, was the catalyst for creating a representative
democracy. The King of England, King John was forced by his barons to sign the charter to
establish that the monarch was no longer absolute and that the people were guaranteed a trial by jury
and due process of law. King John is considered to be one of the worst kings in history. He was not
in favor of the people, he was in favor of himself. Being an avaricious king, he would penalize any
baron who went against his wishes. In 1206, King John lost some land that he was insistent on
getting back. Normandy, Anjou, Maine and parts of Poitou were no longer under his control. In
attempt to retrieve his land he imposed heavy taxes upon his citizens. If the people decided not

Essay on Absolutism
Absolutism During the pre–Enlightenment period, France and England went through very dramatic
and very different government change. At the beginning of this time period, England had achieved
relative stability, due largely in part to Elizabeth I long and successful reign. On the other hand,
France had been subjected to numerous civil and religious wars, therefore leading to instability.
French absolutism was largely a result of these crises and tragedies, with the country recognizing
the need for a strong, powerful leader, which they found during the long and successful reign of
Louis XIV. In England however, many problems arose due to a series of short and incapable rulers,
beginning with James I and ending with James II. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In order to do this, he need to have control of three key elements: the military, tax collection, and the
judicial system, all of which had been controlled locally. In order to seize these powers, Louis
needed to create a bureaucratic system answerable only to the king. Essentially, Louis had to seize
power from the hands of the nobles. Louis succeeded in creating a national tax collection process,
where taxes were paid directly to the king rather then the nobles. This way, by the end of his reign,
Louis was collecting 80% of the taxes due to him whereas before, with the nobles acting as
middlemen, only 30% of the taxes due to the king were actually received. In order to placate the
nobles, he exempted them from taxes, thus appealing to their senses while stripping them of their
power. The nobles began to believe that the only way to achieve a stable and prosperous state and
secure their own interests was to support Louis' monarchy. Louis used much of this money to create
a centralized military of professional soldiers and gradually took the military power from the
individual regions. Military allegiance was due only to the king, so the danger of military rebellion
was greatly reduced. He took away regional independence by dividing the country into six
generalités, each one governed by an appointed member of the upper class rather then a noble.
These governors were required to spend a large amount of time at

Political Systems Thematic Essay
History and culture of many nations and societies have been affected by political systems. In the
1600s–1700s two political systems, absolute monarchy of France and the constitutional monarchy
of England, have affected Europe. Absolute monarchy is when a ruler rules with absolute, or total,
power. A constitutional monarchy is when laws limit the power of the monarch so they cannot rule
absolutely. These two political systems affected not only their own country, but the whole of Europe
as well. Mainly under the influences of the two leaders Louis XIV, Charles II, James II, Prince
William, and Queen Mary.
One of the most known rulers that ruled with absolute power in France was Louis XIV. Louis ruled
for many years and was considered ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Jean Baptiste Colbert, the minister of finance, helped Louis the most in achieving these goals. He
expanded manufacturing, placed high tariffs on imported goods, encouraged people to move to
colonies, and supported mercantilism. After Colbert's death, Louis created a policy which slowed
down France's economic progress. He also cancelled the Edict of Nantes, which protected the
religious freedom of Huguenots. When Louis got rid of the Edict of Nantes, it caused many
Huguenot artisans and business people to flee the country, leaving France without many skilled
workers.Another thing that Louis did was build the palace of Versailles, a huge palace that stretched
for 500 yards. Louis also forced his country to fight several wars, considering France had an army
other countries could not even match. The other countries were eventually able to join forces and
match France's strength, in which Louis began to impose more taxes to pay for army finances. When
Louis eventually died, he left behind a legacy yet he also left behind many debts and a ruined
France. Although France was now a power to be reckoned with, the debts and bad harvests had an
affect on the people and they had resentment because of the royal abuse they took.
One could define a constitutional (limited) monarchy as a rule when the King or Queen's power was
limited by law, document, and legislature. One could also characterize a limited monarchy as when
the King or Queen have

Rhetorical Devices Of George Savile
Throughout history, authentic sources have made kings seem like, either, tyrannical beings or beings
that have turned a country over from a depressed past. Who the citizens celebrated or detested, but
were too scared to protest because the power of the king was too overbearing to challenge his
authority. King Charles II was the king of England from 1630 to 1685, and during his reign the
citizens of England criticized him for his efforts, or lack of in his governing. Sir George Savile, a
member of Charles' Privy Council, in an essay, used rhetorical devices to portray King Charles II as
an ordinary person, that gets to live the life of royalty. One strategy that Savile used to portray
Charles II's normality is by pulling ouut Charles' flaws and examining them to show general
behaviors. Savile brings up the point that for a person of his social standing, is hard not to be
indulgent. Since there are no rules governing King Charles II, he does not have to follow any. Savile
gives the example, of King Charles' ability to sleep around, and his ability to use people to punish
themselves. Of course these behaviors are not common by the English citizens, but Savile is
convincing the audience that since Charles II had no regulation and the power to push his powers
for self–indulgency. Savile, also, brings up the point that the title of king is just a pedestal that an
average man stands upon, and that there is no reason to be envious of the the title, king. Savile
states,"A prince

What Role Did Religion Play In The 1640s
Q: Why did the English king and Parliament quarrel in the 1640s? What were the most important
issues behind the war between them, and who bears more responsibility for it? What was the
Glorious Revolution, and why did it take place? What role did religion play in the seventeenth–
century English politics? Do you think the victory of Parliament over the monarchy in England was
inevitable?
A: King Charles I and Parliament quarreled because the king had been ignoring Parliaments' voice
for some time. So once the king decided he needed money for his war in Scotland, but tired of the
king's bullying, Parliament refused to support Charles until he resolved many political and religious
offenses. King Charles I really held a lot of the blame here because

The Political and Religious winds of The Seventeenth...
THE POLITICAL AND RELIGIOUS WINDS OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY FROM
CHARLES I TO OLIVER CROMWELL
The Restoration, a period of constantly changing ideals, shows how the change in government from
Charles I to Oliver Cromwell affected the people of that time, shows the Child of Hope, shows the
shift in winds of religion, compares and contrasts Absolutism and Constitutionalism, shows how the
influence of the English people on the world, and shows a new era being heralded in without which
we would not exist. The seventeenth century, started with the Ascension of Charles I to the throne of
his father James II. It was a relatively stable period under Charles I, yet it soon became engrossed in
a civil war, of which. Oliver Cromwell and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During January of 1629 it was decided by parliament to legally try to reduce the power held by the
crown. In so doing it was found that Popery and placing taxes on the people without their consent
was treason (Kagan 454). Popery was especially bad in England because it was in England that the
king was also the head of the church and could make any religious policies he desired.
When parliament declared Charles I guilty of treason England was full of mixed emotions. Those
who followed the king believed that only through submission to divine authority could they be true
Christians. Dissenters were able to gain control thus beheading Charles, and unknowingly creating a
dictator (Tomlinson 3).
Royalists were those who supported the king. Their name was derived from Caballeo (Spanish) this
term denoted someone who was Catholic and had an extreme dislike for Protestants (Chapman 57).
Roundheads were those who supported anyone but the king. Their name referred to the apprentices
of the day, these apprentices caused conflicts to escalate into violence and in turn caused many
people to flee the cities (Chapman 58).
With compromise now nearly impossible parliament was not about to change. It could not change
because: Parliament was already so far ahead, Religion could be used to control and sway the
people, and Charles was stubborn (Buchan 53/54). Oliver Cromwell emerges as the leader of the
dissenters and quickly takes control of a volatile situation. Authority was

Causes And Consequences Of The English Revolution
The English Revolution or more commonly known as the English Civil War, which occurred during
the years of 1642 till 1651, it is known as a period of armed conflict, and when different political
ideas emerged, a time of transition not only for the people but also for the Crown and parliament. In
this academic composition, we will deal with the causes as well as the consequences of the English
Revolution, and how all of them together affected their political life. The Civil War was mainly a
conflict that between the Parliament and the Royalist who in this specific case were the supporters
of the monarchy and of King Charles I (1600 – 1649). During the period of Charles I in the throne it
was known as "personal rule of Charles", he was recognized ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"Power of the Kings is just what the law gives him, and effectively the law is what the courts can
enforce" (Sabine, 2009, pág. 448). But according to Charles I ideology he was a strong believer in
the Divine right, and due to this reason he thought that no one could question his decisions a
doctrine which is completely opposite to the what the parliament stands for, he wanted to take away
the power from the people and the authorities, which at the end came to be something that
influenced the Civil War (Causes of the Civil War, 2013). Right before at the beginning of the Civil
War, there was a growing tension of the growing middle class and the King courts when this reached
a breaking point the Civil War occurred. At last, the money was one of the primary factors at the
outbreak of the Civil War, King Charles I had an extravagant lifestyle and also he financed military
campaigns in several countries, but in order to get provided with money, he needed to call the
parliament, and as well as for the imposing of taxes. Charles began to impose fees on landowners
without the permission of the parliament which caused discontent and tensions between

Revolution : The Glorious Revolution
The Glorious Revolution that occurred in 1688 to 1689 was a bloodless revolution in England that
was a turning point in modern history. The true glory of the revolution was that it contained no
massacre and that a settlement by consent was reached on the religious and political differences that
had divided parties for ages. A thinker during the time, John Locke came up with new models and
inspirations for the evolving concept of government. Locke argued that power came from the
people, not from a divine right to royal rule. Kings should therefore be restrained by institutions that
protected the public interest, including certain general rights to freedom and property. Therefore. a
more democratic form of government known as a limited monarchy replaced absolutism and at the
same time limited its power by the 1689 Bill of Rights. The revolution established the supremacy of
parliament over the crown that set Britain on the path towards constitutional monarchy and
parliamentary democracy (Maurice, 2017). The king and queen became figureheads, when before
they were absolute monarchs. In 1660, when Charles II was on the throne, Englishmen were
uncertain about the Stuarts and suspected him of Papal tendencies and absolutists learnings. Charles
II did not adhere to Parliament since he had favoring alliances with Catholic powers in Europe.
When Charles II died in 1685, Charles was succeeded by his brother James II, Duke of York. The
Whigs, a parliamentary group did not want a

Differences Between Seventeenth Century England And 17th...
The following are the primary differences between the political paths of seventeenth–century
England and the seventeenth century France. Factors that led their different political paths was the
military concerns. Changes in military organization, weapons, and tactics that sharply increased the
cost of warfare. Monarch sought new sales with the growing expenses. Seventeenth century is a
time when the rulers of France were becoming more and more absolutist, England was moving
away from absolutism. The seventeenth century was the time of Louis XIV. He was known as the
Sun King and declared himself â€œwithout equal.â€ He is generally considered to be the most
powerful monarch to ever rule in Western Europe. Louis ruled with an iron fist, and never became
dependent on a single advisor. He often spied on ministers, even opening their mail. In religious
matters, Louis revoked the Edict of Nantes primarily to prevent religious differences from erupting
into a civil conflict. Louis XIV took absolutism to extremes, claiming to be a servant of God (the
"divine right of Kings") and dissolving France's only general assembly. Why absolutism failed in
England but grew in France is due mainly to the political situation in each country when the idea
was first introduced. In England, the English people had been proud of their "rights as Englishmen"
which dated to the Magna Carta of 1215. They were never ruled by an absolute monarch and had no
intention of submitting. When Charles I attempted to dissolve Parliament and finally declared war
on it, he was executed for treason, the first monarch to be executed by his own people. After a brief
experiment with the Protectorate of Oliver Cromwell, Charles II returned to England as monarch.
He was succeeded by James II who also isolated (divided) the English people and was forced to
flee. At the invitation of Parliament William of Orange (in the Netherlands) and James' daughter
Mary were invited to assume the English throne; (this was the "Glorious Revolution of 1688) but
were required of accepting the Throne to sign the English Bill of Rights, which stated the monarch
could not suspend laws passed by Parliament, judges would hold office "during good

The 1600s: The Glorious Revolution Of England
The Glorious Revolution was a time period of great prosperity in the English government.
Throughout the time period many kings and queens reigned over England. From James Ⅱ, William
and Mary, to the Tudors, the country was ruled by great monarchs. The Glorious Revolution
prospered throughout the 1600's due to the reign of James Ⅱ, and William and Mary. These
monarchs contributed and affected the British monarchy and parliament.
James Ⅱ was placed on the throne after the death of his brother King Charles Ⅱ.
Prior to the death of King Charles Ⅱ, James Ⅱ was exiled from England for twelve years. Keeping
himself busy, during his exile he fought in service for the French and the Spanish crowns. This
brought up talk about how brave he was earning him a positive reputation. James was recalled back
to England when his brother took ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He started to bring himself into a tight position that allowed people to get together and try to
overthrow him. To start it all out James Ⅱ singled out the royal Church of England. "James made a
serious miscalculation in trying to force the clergy to read his second Declaration of Indulgence of
April 1688" ("James Ⅱ" by Tim Harris). He singled out the church by ordering the reading from the
second Declaration of Indulgence. For the people that didn't like James he just made it a lot worse
by trying to force something upon others. Amongst this time James' wife had just given birth to a
son who overlooked their daughter Mary. Mary was protestant and many people had already been
reevaluating the catholic rule, but now that Mary wouldn't reign people had to reassess their
opinions. Finally the last thing that ended James' reign was the letter that Mary's husband had
received about an intervention. William had been foretold of this intervention by opposers of James'
rule. Along with the people that had sent the letter William had been concerned with the English

The Restoration Under Charles II Essay
The Restoration Under Charles II Generally, the English people had a great celebration when
Charles II returned to the throne in May of 1660.1 Many believed that restoring the monarchy was
the only way to secure constitutional rights. In fact, there was an expectation that bringing back the
king would return life to the way it was before 1642 and the rule of Cromwell. Charles II was
responsible for improving the government for the people. However, despite some achievements, the
king was not very successful in creating a stronger and more effective monarchy. He was dependent
on his advisors and other parts of the government from the very beginning of his reign. There were
constant conflicts between the king and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This council consisted of English men who held public office or owned extensive amounts of land.
Smaller committees within the council made all the major decisions.3 The king looked to the Privy
Council for help in solving the country's problems. Clarendon's main objective for the council was
to lessen the power of Parliament. Since the king relied a large deal on the council for making
decisions, Parliament did not meet as often.4 Clarendon also knew that the militia was a major part
of government, but he wanted to keep the army small. He knew that a large army would make the
people nervous about an absolutist monarchy. A small militia kept the country safe from a possible
foreign attack.5 There was one main issue that Clarendon and Charles disagreed on very strongly:
religious tolerance. Clarendon believed in using coercive acts to eliminate dissenters. However,
Charles did not want to persecute people with different religious beliefs if they were not causing
problems for England. In April of 1660, he put these ideas into effect with the Breda Declaration.
This declaration was the first of many signs that Charles was impartial to Catholics. Parliament,
however, sided with Clarendon on this conflict. In 1661, Parliament passed the Act of Uniformity.
The act ended all tolerance for Presbyterianism and forced all of its followers to agree to everything
in the Anglicans' Book of Common Prayer. Parliament also refused to accept the king's

Essay on The English Civil War
The English Civil War The English Civil War was a complicated, intellectual war between the two
most powerful forces in England: Parliament and the King. Conflicts between the two powers began
when King Charles I dissolved Parliament in 1625 because they would not give him the money he
demanded to fund his war against Spain. Parliament, who was lead by John Pym, felt that the King
was showing favouritism towards the Roman Catholics, especially since Charles had recently
married the Roman Catholic French Princess. Although Charles recalled Parliament in 1626, he
proceeded to dissolve the second Parliament mainly because it attempted to impeach him. John
Pym, who had been prevented from being elected to the second Parliament, was ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
While there were minor reforms to the system, the people, the Church and the Monarchy of England
went back to living their lives relatively the same as they had before the start of the English Civil
War. Violence during the English Civil war effected hundreds of thousands of English civilians.
However, "while violence killed thousands of people...the impact of the war – as a war – was
surprisingly limited." Casualties during the war were high: 190 000 people died in England and 868
000, or 11.6% of the population, perished within the British Isles. This number was only a third of
the amount of people who died in England during the great plague of 1570 – 1670. King Charles II
was content with putting things aside and starting over again, and it seemed like the people of
England were too. Although women and children lost husbands and fathers, their loses were quickly
replaced by new husbands or relatives to help out. By the end of the war, most people simply
wanted to get on with their lives since there was nothing that they could about the people they lost
during the war. Many people forgot their differences and were found even marrying across the
barriers which were created during the war. Damaged property was quickly repaired since it created
jobs for civilians looking for work. Buildings were destroyed, but since the war was not as explosive

Main Causes Of The English Civil War
The English Civil War were multiple events of armed battles and political machinations between
Parliamentarians(Roundheads) and Royalists(Cavaliers) over the English government.
There were multiple battles in the English Civil war, also at different times. The war went on from
August 22 1642 to September 3 1651. Some of the main battles were Edgehill, Marston Moor, and
the battle of Naseby.America was involved in this war and it is one of their only Civil Wars ever.
There were a lot of casualties in the war, and a lot of long battles fought.
The English Civil War was taken place in the Kingdom of England and was nine years long.
Religion was a major cause of the Civil War, mostly stemmed from problems between Charles I and
the Parliament over an Irish insurrection. The war included the Parliament, the Aristocracy, the
middle classes, the commoners, and other armies. The Parliament was the highest legislature of the
House of Lords, a commoner was an ordinary person, the Aristocracy is the highest class in
particular societies, and the middle class are people who are in between the working class and the
upper class. There were supporters of the King and supporters of the Parliament which was led by
Oliver Cromwell, it just all depended on what they believed in. The war also involved other
kingdoms ruled by the Stuart Dynasty, Scotland and Ireland. This conflict left around 34,000
Parliamentarians and 50,000 Royalists dead, while more than 100,000 men and women died from

Declaration Of Indulgence Dbq
Isabel Yang
Ms. Loffredo
EHA P. 2
March 15, 2017
Hutton and Bate's views on Charles II's Domestic Policy in England In the books Charles II King of
England, Scotland, and Ireland, by Ronald Hutton, and The Declaration of Indulgence 1672 a study
in the rise of organized dissent, by Frank Bate, both authors expound the Declaration of Indulgence
enforced by King Charles II of England in 1672 in attempt to restore religious toleration to all
religions. Ronald Hutton, the author of Charles II King of England, Scotland, and Ireland, believes
that the Declaration of Indulgence was the key to keeping England unified. Hutton also believes that
the Cavalier Parliament was attempting to bring England back to a pre–reformation era. In 1662,
Parliament established this by ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although the Declaration was met with the Test Act, which had consequential effects upon
England's government, Charles was able to establish his supremacy ecclesiastically over Parliament.
Both Authors recognize the failure of this document but still believe it was a smart move for Charles
to attempt to keep peace in England. Bate thought that the penal laws enforced by Parliament were
relentless and inhumane. Hutton views on Parliament were slightly different. Hutton interpreted
Parliament's Act of Uniformity as a way of restoring order to the government. While their opinions
about Parliament's Act are different, they both agree that Parliament is limiting the power of the
throne: ecclesiastically and politically. The Declaration of Indulgence did successfully grant
religious tolerance to Catholics and Protestants. After the creation of the Test Act, all non–anglicans
lost the right to hold civil or military office. In conclusion, both authors agree that the Charles's
domestic policy, the Declaration of Indulgence, was successful but not to the extent he had been

The Jacobean Era
THE EARLY SEVENTEENTH CENTURY, 1603–1660 The death of Queen Elizabeth I in 1603
marks the beginning of this literary period. Elizabeth I, also known as the Virgin Queen, was
childless. Her relation, James Stuart, succeeded her on England's throne as King James I (in
Scotland, his title was King James VI). Elizabeth I's reign (1558–1603) is known as the Elizabethan
period. James I's reign (1603–1625) is known as the Jacobean period, from the Latin for
James,Jacobus. Charles I's reign (1625–1640) is known as the Caroline period, from the Latin for
Charles,Carolus. James I was an authoritarian who believed kings derived their powers from God,
not from the people. This belief caused political tension between the king, the Parliament, and the

Why Is Charles 1 Important
Before the restoration period happened, King Charles the I was trailed and executed in 1649 at the
climax of the English civil war Charles the II was then exiled to Europe and spent the next 9 years
there. While king Charles the I son was in exile Oliver got this role by defeating Charles II at the
battle of Worcester in 1651. The English civil war began 1642–1651 between parlinations known as
round heads....... they didn't agree on how the country was run Cromwell believed that churches
should be reformed with much stricter values and laws based on religion and that the parliament
should be elected by the people. The royalist king Charles I believed in ................................. The
most important events of the war where the trial and execution of king Charles I and the exile of his
son Charles II. Then the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The classes in restoration times where much like they ae today you had the monarchy which where
the royals you had the lords temporal which where the lords and ladies the nobility then the
gentlemen freeholders who where the lesser nobility such as knights and gentlemen, then the
merchant class who where business men, doctors and lawyers then you got the lower class who
where he servants and labourers. In the play "She Stoops to Conquer" it shows a lot of different
classes within this such as the Hardcastles the Hardcastles are of a much lower class than for
instance Marlow and Hastings, they show this by using different accents so you can clearly tell who
is more upper class also you can tell by what they wear. In some of the scenes you see the
Hardcastles some what taking the mick out of the much higher class gentlemen for example in the
pub seen where Tony tells Marlow and Hastings that they are at the wrong destination and they have
really come to the right place. "Its a damn'd long, dark, boggy, dirty, dangerous

Essay On The Restoration Period
The period from 1660 to 1700 is known as the Restoration period. It was a period when King
Charles II of England marked the beginning of a new era both in social life and the literature of
England upon his return from exile. He revived a theatrical genre known as 'Comedies of Manners'
which was lewd and hilarious. 'The Way of the world' depicts real picture of the restoration period
connected to amoral and exploitative manners of the people. Therefore, this essay will be analyzed
based on how the play acts as a social mirror of the restoration period in England during Congreve's
time. First of all, the play is a dramatic representation of varieties of love that prevailed in England
during the restoration period. Marriage was just a mere game of love. There were betrayals on
marriage without love yet the fake relation continued for various reasons. Mirabell, the ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
People were concerned about money and its security rather than considering marriage a sacred
ceremony knitted with love and loyalty. Mirabell's love for Millamant does not make him lose his
sight and attention of Millamant's fortune for she is the heir to 6,000 pound .Mirabell and Millamant
need Lady Wishfort's approval for their marriage or else Millamant would lose half of her
inheritance which is under Lady Wishfort's control. Mr. Fainall also marries Mrs. Fainall for the
sake of money he could acquire from her. According to Siwach (n.d), the fact that Mr. Fainall
married for money can be hardly held against him in his society, but to marry for money to finance
for love affair is more difficult to accept. Thus, it is comprehensible that love without money is an
impossible dream, although money corrupts what love is. Nonetheless, the fact of acquiring money
dealt a business over fake marriage and mostly an agreement of a secure future and also in
providing good reputation to

Major Life Events As Well As Gaps Or Discrepancies From...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Sue Ganguli

More from Sue Ganguli (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Major Life Events As Well As Gaps Or Discrepancies From...