By
Nikhil Ingale



           1
2
 Today most international car manufacturers have
  entered the Indian market.
 As it one of the fastest growing economies in the
  world. As India provides excellent global
  technologies, most international Car manufacturers
  can access these through joint ventures with India.




                                                        3
India is a 2nd largest two wheeler manufacturer in the
 world.
India is the 2nd largest Tractor Manufacturer in the
 world.
India is the 5th largest commercial vehicle
 manufacturer in the world.
India is the 3rd largest car market in Asia.




                                                          4
Maruti
Hyundai
Tata
Ford
Hindustan Motors
Mahindra and Mahindra




                         5
Mahindra & Mahindra : Product range includes:
 Jeep
 Scorpio
 Marshal etc.
Tata : Product range includes:
 Tata Safari
 Tata Sierra
 Tata Sum
Toyota: Product range includes:
 Toyota Qualis




                                                 6
A study conducted to understand the UV customer
 by advertising agency ‘Interface Communication’
 revealed the following criterion of consumer buying
 process:-
Customer preferred big size as it stands for status.
Consumers seek latest technology.
Consumers wants the sheer thrill and passion of
 driving an SUV at affordable prices.




                                                        7
Mahindra & Mahindra Limited (M&M) is a major
 automobile company in India. It is the flagship company
 of the Mahindra Group. It was set up in 1945 to make
 general-purpose utility vehicles for the Indian market.
The company has recently started a separate Sector,
 Mahindra Systems and Automotive Technologies (MSAT)
 in order to focus on developing components as well as
 offering engineering services.




                                                           8
In late 1990’s Mahindra, a leader in the UV
 segment, was fast witnessing loss of market share.
 Global players were entering the Auto market and
 aggressively launching products.
The Mahindra image was a big barrier as well.
 Though it had positives as rugged, tough, reliable,
 economical vehicle. The negative parameter were:
 Uncomfortable, rough, not easy to drive, rural
 imagery, down market, fuddy-duddy etc.




                                                       9
When the Mahindra started to lose its market share
 because of previous mentioned problems they
 decided to launch a product with the following
 objectives:
To create a new segment and retain market
 domination.
To differentiate offering (vis-a-vis MNCs)- i.e. to
 provide an excellent value proposition to the
 customer.
To optimize project costs.




                                                       10
Providing the low cost transportation range to rural
 & semi-urban market.
Develop the strong presence in urban market with
 VFM product.
To compete with global players & make his
 presence in urban market M&M embarked on
 project Scorpio.




                                                        11
For MNC competition it did not have deep pockets.
The project cost had to by optimized.
Product should give VFM.
Product should be very affordable.
Product was needing innovation & thinking out of
 the box.




                                                     12
A unique process called IDAM (integrated design &
 manufacturing).
Best in worlds tie ups but in-house executions.
Customer focus from thought to finish.
A cross-functional, co-located, young, lean team.




                                                     13
 Lowest project cost
 Intensive testing
 All new manufacturing set up
 It is easer to make what you can sale then to
  sale what you have made. Guide line of the
  force of the IDAM (Mumbai)




                                                  14
Every aspect of product development
Design & development
Testing & validation
Manufacturing
Vendor development & marketing




                                       15
   M&M tied up with the best in the world in their
    respective areas in auto industries. As:-

     Seats & interiors Lear, USA Paint shop Durr,
      Germany Tester of final assembly Fori
      Automation, USA Body shop Wooshin, Korea
      Dies Fuji, Japan Press shop Fukui, Japan

     Global Alliances For The Best Petrol engines
      Renault A.C. BHER, Germany Suspension Samlip,
      Korea Exteriors Visteon, USA


                                                      16
Trapped the consumer requirement
Mapped the market potential of the various vehicle
 categories.
Visited to market & met the customer
The customer requirement were converted into
 product specification.
Customer inputs were taken at every stage.




                                                      17
 Built a brand new vehicle with 100%supplier
  involvement
 The cost of the project was $120 million
 Many multi-nationals were coming in
 Many has a talk with M&M but in the end
  decided to move forward alone - SUV’s
 Now M&M had to decide about their products
 Did not had any expertise to do a brand new
  product


                                                18
   Two options left with M&M
   M&M had a very little experience in PD
   Risky decision
   After performing market research, styling and
    features for the new Scorpio started taking
    shape
   But M&M realized tough job – PD , hiring
    people , train them
   Only option – leverage the strength of
    suppliers available in India involved in PD

                                                    19
Went in search of suppliers
Lucas Engineering
M&M got IDAM process and soon developed its
 MPDS
Mahindra, its 120 people and engineers were
 responsible for the initial styling,body engg.,
 chassis and frame design and the vehicle
 integration – Everything else was turned over to
 suppliers




                                                    20
   For interiors – Lear

   Cost were also kept low because M&M struck
    to their original parameters for the project
    and didn’t change specifications or content
   Over three years many automakers were
    having different designs – Scorpio design
    changed a little
   Mahindra stayed hand-off in the project and
    allowed suppliers to use their expertise, even
    if it meant using unproven process

                                                     21
A world class manufacturing set up was spread over
 120 acres.
Its capacity was 40,000 units annual on a 2 shift
 basis.
It was stabilized in Nashik with a investment of USD
 120 million.
Infrastructure wise three new state of art line were
 developed for production.




                                                        22
First year of launch
 To capture the 22% of the premium hard top market in
  9 months (fev.03)
 To sale 12000 Scorpio
 To increase Mahindra unaided brand recall score by 22
  points (defined by brand track study score)
 To make Scorpio brand recall score to achieve 50
  points.




                                                          23
With in three years of launch
 To capture 45% of the premium hard top market
 To sell 24000 units in Feb. 04
 To make Mahindra emerge as a true urban player
Strategic branding approach
 Scorpio didn’t take the traditional UV image
 It needed to be seen like car to appeal car buyer




                                                      24
It gives car like driving pleasure & the space, fuel
 efficiency, power style, luxury & comfort like a car.
It provides the status of a Pajero (international SUV) at
 the price of mid size car.
It offered superior technology, dynamic looks, car like
 product and value for money.
Car plus
Parent brand relation




                                                             25
Brand endorsement
Advertisement & promotion strategy
Media strategy
 Dynamic & high impact launch
 High visibility
 Push brand image even by the media vehicle




                                               26
Branding impact through
 PR
 Mass media
 Direct marketing
 Events
 Customer Relationship Management




                                     27
   Competition with
     Accent
     Ikon
     Corsa
     Esteem
     Qualis
     Safari
     Sumo

   It have to adopt the penetrative pricing
    strategy.
   So It had adopted Rs.5-7 Lacs

                                               28
Serve less markets but serve them well
Phased launch
 Mumbai, Bangalore, Delhi & Chennai
 With in four months---20 cities
 With in a year---50 cities
Showroom experience
Infrastructure




                                          29
Volumes and Market Shares: Scorpio achieved its
 targets on market share and achieved a volume of
 12,000 vehicles in the first 9 months of its launch.
Image: Scorpio advertising had a very high recall
 for the mahindra brand as well as for the product.
 Apart from this, advertising actually positioned
 scorpio as a powerful vehicle with a sporty look.




                                                        30
Well respected manufacturers
Technologically advanced
Suitable for city driving
Great to drive
Makes VFM vehicles
Proud to own
Makes good quality vehicles




                                31
Scorpio managed to pull out customers from the C
 segment of vehicles.
The strategy delivered with more and more small
 and mid-size car buyers choosing the Scorpio over
 the other.




                                                     32
The Scorpio was awarded various from various
 bodies. M&M has more than 39% of market share in
 hard tops, sold 11,800 Scorpios in the first 9
 months of operation and due to this campaign,
 Mahindra image improved.




                                                    33

Mahindra scorpio nikhil ingale

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
     Today mostinternational car manufacturers have entered the Indian market.  As it one of the fastest growing economies in the world. As India provides excellent global technologies, most international Car manufacturers can access these through joint ventures with India. 3
  • 4.
    India is a2nd largest two wheeler manufacturer in the world. India is the 2nd largest Tractor Manufacturer in the world. India is the 5th largest commercial vehicle manufacturer in the world. India is the 3rd largest car market in Asia. 4
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Mahindra & Mahindra: Product range includes: Jeep Scorpio Marshal etc. Tata : Product range includes: Tata Safari Tata Sierra Tata Sum Toyota: Product range includes: Toyota Qualis 6
  • 7.
    A study conductedto understand the UV customer by advertising agency ‘Interface Communication’ revealed the following criterion of consumer buying process:- Customer preferred big size as it stands for status. Consumers seek latest technology. Consumers wants the sheer thrill and passion of driving an SUV at affordable prices. 7
  • 8.
    Mahindra & MahindraLimited (M&M) is a major automobile company in India. It is the flagship company of the Mahindra Group. It was set up in 1945 to make general-purpose utility vehicles for the Indian market. The company has recently started a separate Sector, Mahindra Systems and Automotive Technologies (MSAT) in order to focus on developing components as well as offering engineering services. 8
  • 9.
    In late 1990’sMahindra, a leader in the UV segment, was fast witnessing loss of market share. Global players were entering the Auto market and aggressively launching products. The Mahindra image was a big barrier as well. Though it had positives as rugged, tough, reliable, economical vehicle. The negative parameter were: Uncomfortable, rough, not easy to drive, rural imagery, down market, fuddy-duddy etc. 9
  • 10.
    When the Mahindrastarted to lose its market share because of previous mentioned problems they decided to launch a product with the following objectives: To create a new segment and retain market domination. To differentiate offering (vis-a-vis MNCs)- i.e. to provide an excellent value proposition to the customer. To optimize project costs. 10
  • 11.
    Providing the lowcost transportation range to rural & semi-urban market. Develop the strong presence in urban market with VFM product. To compete with global players & make his presence in urban market M&M embarked on project Scorpio. 11
  • 12.
    For MNC competitionit did not have deep pockets. The project cost had to by optimized. Product should give VFM. Product should be very affordable. Product was needing innovation & thinking out of the box. 12
  • 13.
    A unique processcalled IDAM (integrated design & manufacturing). Best in worlds tie ups but in-house executions. Customer focus from thought to finish. A cross-functional, co-located, young, lean team. 13
  • 14.
     Lowest projectcost  Intensive testing  All new manufacturing set up  It is easer to make what you can sale then to sale what you have made. Guide line of the force of the IDAM (Mumbai) 14
  • 15.
    Every aspect ofproduct development Design & development Testing & validation Manufacturing Vendor development & marketing 15
  • 16.
    M&M tied up with the best in the world in their respective areas in auto industries. As:- Seats & interiors Lear, USA Paint shop Durr, Germany Tester of final assembly Fori Automation, USA Body shop Wooshin, Korea Dies Fuji, Japan Press shop Fukui, Japan Global Alliances For The Best Petrol engines Renault A.C. BHER, Germany Suspension Samlip, Korea Exteriors Visteon, USA 16
  • 17.
    Trapped the consumerrequirement Mapped the market potential of the various vehicle categories. Visited to market & met the customer The customer requirement were converted into product specification. Customer inputs were taken at every stage. 17
  • 18.
     Built abrand new vehicle with 100%supplier involvement  The cost of the project was $120 million  Many multi-nationals were coming in  Many has a talk with M&M but in the end decided to move forward alone - SUV’s  Now M&M had to decide about their products  Did not had any expertise to do a brand new product 18
  • 19.
    Two options left with M&M  M&M had a very little experience in PD  Risky decision  After performing market research, styling and features for the new Scorpio started taking shape  But M&M realized tough job – PD , hiring people , train them  Only option – leverage the strength of suppliers available in India involved in PD 19
  • 20.
    Went in searchof suppliers Lucas Engineering M&M got IDAM process and soon developed its MPDS Mahindra, its 120 people and engineers were responsible for the initial styling,body engg., chassis and frame design and the vehicle integration – Everything else was turned over to suppliers 20
  • 21.
    For interiors – Lear  Cost were also kept low because M&M struck to their original parameters for the project and didn’t change specifications or content  Over three years many automakers were having different designs – Scorpio design changed a little  Mahindra stayed hand-off in the project and allowed suppliers to use their expertise, even if it meant using unproven process 21
  • 22.
    A world classmanufacturing set up was spread over 120 acres. Its capacity was 40,000 units annual on a 2 shift basis. It was stabilized in Nashik with a investment of USD 120 million. Infrastructure wise three new state of art line were developed for production. 22
  • 23.
    First year oflaunch To capture the 22% of the premium hard top market in 9 months (fev.03) To sale 12000 Scorpio To increase Mahindra unaided brand recall score by 22 points (defined by brand track study score) To make Scorpio brand recall score to achieve 50 points. 23
  • 24.
    With in threeyears of launch To capture 45% of the premium hard top market To sell 24000 units in Feb. 04 To make Mahindra emerge as a true urban player Strategic branding approach Scorpio didn’t take the traditional UV image It needed to be seen like car to appeal car buyer 24
  • 25.
    It gives carlike driving pleasure & the space, fuel efficiency, power style, luxury & comfort like a car. It provides the status of a Pajero (international SUV) at the price of mid size car. It offered superior technology, dynamic looks, car like product and value for money. Car plus Parent brand relation 25
  • 26.
    Brand endorsement Advertisement &promotion strategy Media strategy Dynamic & high impact launch High visibility Push brand image even by the media vehicle 26
  • 27.
    Branding impact through PR Mass media Direct marketing Events Customer Relationship Management 27
  • 28.
    Competition with  Accent  Ikon  Corsa  Esteem  Qualis  Safari  Sumo  It have to adopt the penetrative pricing strategy.  So It had adopted Rs.5-7 Lacs 28
  • 29.
    Serve less marketsbut serve them well Phased launch Mumbai, Bangalore, Delhi & Chennai With in four months---20 cities With in a year---50 cities Showroom experience Infrastructure 29
  • 30.
    Volumes and MarketShares: Scorpio achieved its targets on market share and achieved a volume of 12,000 vehicles in the first 9 months of its launch. Image: Scorpio advertising had a very high recall for the mahindra brand as well as for the product. Apart from this, advertising actually positioned scorpio as a powerful vehicle with a sporty look. 30
  • 31.
    Well respected manufacturers Technologicallyadvanced Suitable for city driving Great to drive Makes VFM vehicles Proud to own Makes good quality vehicles 31
  • 32.
    Scorpio managed topull out customers from the C segment of vehicles. The strategy delivered with more and more small and mid-size car buyers choosing the Scorpio over the other. 32
  • 33.
    The Scorpio wasawarded various from various bodies. M&M has more than 39% of market share in hard tops, sold 11,800 Scorpios in the first 9 months of operation and due to this campaign, Mahindra image improved. 33