NanoHoldings is raising $650 million from existing investors to acquire Magenta, a leader in plasma gasification waste-to-energy technology. Magenta has operated a commercial demonstration plant since 2008 that converts municipal solid waste into syngas to generate electricity. The acquisition will allow NanoHoldings to commercialize Magenta's proven and efficient technology, targeting 10-15% of the large global market for waste management. Projections estimate the investment could return over 9 times within 4 years upon projected sale of the company in 2018.

1. NanoHoldings L.L.C (“NH”)
ACQUISITION OF MAGENTA
TURNING GARBAGE INTO ELECTRICITY & WATER
Changing the Way
Communities Deal With Waste

2. NANOHOLDINGS ACQUSITION OF MAGENTA

NanoHoldings is a global technology development company

Specialize in energy and water technologies that are better, cheaper, faster and
available to the mass market.

Key anchor investors are leading corporate and financial institutions:

Morgan Stanley

McLendon Ventures [Former CEO Chesapeake Energy]

Schlumberger

Royal DSM [formerly Dutch State Mining]

Anchor [India]

HRH Prince Turki bin Faisal Al Saud

KACST

Raising US$650 mm from existing NanoHoldings investors to acquire Magenta

1st term sheet from existing shareholder for US$325mm in hand

3. NanoHoldings Corporate Development Strategy
Longer Term
Revenue
Medium Term
Revenue
Short Term
Revenue

4. WHERE DOES YOUR GARBAGE GO?
Historically:
waste has been buried….
…or waste has been burned.

5. 5

8. MAGENTA WASTE TO ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Magenta is the world leader in plasma gasification Waste-to-Energy (WTE)
technology
 Converts Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) into syngas which then fuels a GE engine to generate
electricity.
 Most advanced commercial plasma gasification WTE, and only scaled operating facility
in the world.
Proven, Commercial-Ready Technology with by multi-year operating history
 Since January 2008, Magenta has operated a commercial-sized single module demonstration
plant, processing up to 100 tons per day of MSW
Magenta provides the world’s best solution to the Municipal Solid Waste disposal
 95% reduction in solid waste from landfills and significantly reduces air emissions
 Cleaner, cheaper and more efficient than incineration.
 Produces 0.9 MWh of Baseload Power per ton of MSW processed or 126,000 MWh
annually per module
 Produces 228 liters of water per ton or 31.9 million liters of clean water per year per
module

9. PROCESS
Changing the Way
Communities Deal With Waste

10. Four Stage Conversion Process

11. 11

12. Four Stage Conversion Process
Stage 1 - Shredding

13. 13

14. Four Stage Conversion Process
Stage 2 - Conversion

15. 15

16. Four Stage Conversion Process
Stage 3 - Refining

18. Four Stage Conversion Process
Stage 4 - Power Generation

19. 19

20. COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
Changing the Way
Communities Deal With Waste

21. MAGENTA IMPROVES LOCAL AIR QUALITY vs LANDFILL
PARTICULATE NITROGEN
MATTER
OXIDE
33%
Less
68%
Less
DIOXINS &
FURANS
HEAVY
METALS
ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
78%
Less
91%
Less
99%
Less
100
80
60
40
20
0
*Magenta data compared to published Vancouver, Canada Landfill data.

22. MAGENTA vs INCINERATION
Magenta emissions compared to the Durham, Ontario incinerator planned limits:
PARTICULATE HYDROGEN SULPHUR
DIOXIDE
MATTER
CHLORIDE
100
NITROGEN
OXIDE
88% LESS 95% LESS 61% LESS 75% LESS
80
60
40
20
0
Magenta
Latest Incinerator
Technology
DIOXINS &
FURANS
HEAVY
METALS
NON-METHANE
ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
98% LESS 99.7% LESS 98% LESS

23. COMPETITIVE OVERVIEW –
WHY MAGENTA LEADS OTHER WASTE MANAGEMENT METHODS
Pros
Cheaper to build and
operate, requiring lower tip
fees
Landfill
Landfill
Incineration
Incineration
Established technology
High cost at community
scale
Relatively low cost at scale
350,000 tons/yr or more
Gasification
Gasification
Anaerobic Digestion
Anaerobic Digestion
Liquid Fuels/
Liquid Fuels/
Chemicals
Chemicals
Cons
− Given space required and NIMBY issues, expensive
transfer station and transport costs in addition to tip
fee
− Contaminates and leachate into municipal water
tables
− Lower power output from landfill gas capture
− Large footprint (the amount of waste a Magenta plant
− converts annually than competing a landfill 15x its
Higher emissions is equivalent to WTE technologies
− size)
Residues (mainly ash) need to landfilled
− Requires large scale to be cost-competitive
− Permitting is virtually impossible in some jurisdictions
due to NIMBY issues (smoke stack, truck traffic)
Low emissions
High landfill diversion
− Low net energy production
− Not competitive on costs/efficiency
Cost leader among
alternatives to land filling
No smoke stack
− ~20-30% of the MSW (non-biological / non-recyclable
materials) needs further processing or is landfilled
− Pre-sorting is required
Given high prices of fuels,
potentially attractive
economics
− Early stage
− Two-stage conversion
− Yet to be proven at scale

24. INFLECTION POINT: COMMERCIALIZATION &
PROFITABILITY
Changing the Way
Communities Deal With Waste

25. A DECADE OF DEVELOPMENT: A DECADE AHEAD OF THE
COMPETITION
Q2 2005
Q4 2015
Magenta Energy Group
Q2 2005
Operations of 1st Commercial Plant
Q3 2013
Q4 2015

26. MAGENTA: POINT OF COMMERCIALIZATION
MAGENTA TODAY:
First commercial plant
leading to rapid sales growth
and profit expansion
Profit
Investment
Competitors:
At capital intensive
technological
development stage

27. ADDRESSABLE WORLD MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Total Addressable
Market (TAM)
(MSW in million tons per year)
Target Magenta Share
(10-15% depending on
market)
TAM
# of Magenta Units
# Units
66
1,535
230
70
1,628
163
98
2,279
342
ROW
60
1,395
140
TOTAL
294
6,837
875
$376B
$48B
North America
Europe
Asia Pacific
McKinsey & Co - Waste to Energy Market Study Results

28. MAGENTA FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS
Caribbean
28
United Kingdom
37
Australia
12
Japan
3
China
186
Total 266

29. 9 0 0 %9 0 0 %%
9 0 %9 0
8 MAGENTA FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS
0 0 %8 0 0 %%
8 0 %8 0
7 0 0 %7 0 0 %%
7 0 %7 0
0
6 0 0 % 6 01 0010 0%0%%%
6 0 %6 0 0
9 0 90 0%0 %
5 0 0 % 5 0 800 8%0%%%
5 0 %5 0 0
0
7 0 70 0%0 %
4 0 0 %4 0 0 %%
4 0 %4 0
6 0 60 0%0 %
0
3 0 0 % 3 0 500 5%0%%%
3 0 %3 0 0
4 0 40 0%0 %
2 0 0 % 2 0 300 3%0%%%
2 0 %2 0 0
0
0
1 0 0 % 1 0 200 2%0%%%
1 0 %1 0 0
1 0 10 0%0 %
00
0 % % 0 %%%%
0
0
% %
0 0
2 2
44
4 % 2 0 21 05 1 4 2 0 1 5 20 0 1 4 0 1 5 % 2 0 21 062 12 55 5 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 % 20 0001656% % 2 0 21 07 1 6 2 0 1 77 2 0 1 % 2 0 1 6 7 20 20 21 08%1 7 2 0 1
7
1 4 % 2 0 21 05 1%4%% % 2 0 1 5 2%2 0%21104 1442% 2% 0 1 5 %2 0 21 06 1%5%1%1%% %2 0 1 6 2% 0% 1 5 22 022 12115611%%6%%2 0 21 07 1%6%% % 2 0 011 0771%2%%0% 1 6 2 0 1 6 % %2 %02110808%81%7%% % 2 0 1 8
5% 0
6 %2 0 1 2 1
R e Rv ee vn eu ne u%e %
7 2 7%2 %
1 4 10 4%0 %
4 4 43 4%3 %
7 3 78 3%8 %
9 2 90 2%0 %
ev
R14
e%e R u u 0 % %T e% e 1 4 0 7 2 1 4 74 2%
R2 v%ev n n 4 Eev7B EnIe2TB nIu%Au%A%%% 1 4 0 % %73 023%0%% % 71 20 %0 %% 4 4 13 4%0%%7%% % 4 4 3 % 1% 4 0 % 14434003240%23%% 7 3 48 4%3%% % 7 532 582%%%4% 4 3 % 4 4 3 % % % 6 28 6708%37%%8%% % 9 2 0
e 1 e % 07 D2 D
4 13 4 7 08 8
4 3 1 4 0 % 1 430%% 7 3 8 4 3
7 3 8 4 3 % 7 4 3 8 9 9 72 70 3 8
78
92
%
9 9
I7 T A
B0 B%I DEDB7ABT%D 0D %A%% 7 8 % % 3 0 % % 7 73 8 % 3 0 27 % % % 3 0 2 % %7 8 % % 3 3 0 2 % 5 2 39 0%2%% % 5 2 9 % 3% 0 2 % 3 0 2 % % % 8 57 2%9%% % 6 8 7
E%I T T AE %8I3%3%0 %
00
8%
78
359
8
7 8 3 0 38 %
3 0 28 %
78
3 0 2 7 8 7 0 2 % 5 2 39 0 2
5 2 9 3 0 2 % 5 0 2 9 6 6 8 57 2 9
68

30. MAGENTA IP PORTFOLIO
 37 patents and patent applications, 14 trademarks (12 registered and 2 pending), as
well as copyrights and trade-secrets
 27 issued patents in a number of countries, and 164 patent applications distributed
among 21 patent families in 51 countries, in addition to copyrights, trademarks and
trade-secrets

31. INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY
Changing the Way
Communities Deal With Waste

32. The Offering – US$650 mm Investment in NanoHoldings to Acquire
MAGENTA
TRANSACTION TERMS & VALUATION
TIMELINE
Invitation to join solely an insiders round of existing
NanoHoldings Shareholders
Pre-money valuation of $650 mm
Acquires 49.9% of NanoHoldings
Minimum Investment US $100 million for 7.67%
Senior Series D Participating Preferred


Nov 30 – completion of initial due diligence
Nov 30 – sign non-binding term sheet
Dec 15 – sign binding term sheet
Dec 31 – complete final due diligence
Jan 21 – Review Legal documents
Jan 31 – Closing & Funding

PROJECTED EXIT SCENARIO – 2018E projected sale (on 2018E EBITDA of US$ 687 mm) provides Series D
Preferred Investor with cash distributions of:
+ $5.142 bn
Cash Return
2014
Investment
2015
2016
2018
2017
- $650 mm
Projected 2018 sale
Cash Return Preferred D Share
=
US$ 10.3
= US$ 5.14 bn
= 9.3 x return on investment
bn
32

33. An investment in the Company involves a high degree of risk, and is suitable only for investors of substantial means who have no immediate need
for liquidity of the amount invested and who can afford a risk of loss of all or a substantial part of such investment. Investors and the Company
may be subject to a number of risks, including, but not limited to, no assurance of any investment return, a long-term and illiquid investment, and
no commercialization of any technology. In addition, any projections or other estimates contained herein, including estimates or forecasts of
returns or performance, are forward-looking statements and are based upon certain assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from the
expectations presented in the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that estimated returns or projections can be
realized. Each prospective investor should consult with his, her or its personal legal, tax and financial advisers and carefully consider and
evaluate the risks before investing in the Company. Projections and other forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to
future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties and should not be regarded as a representation by us that the
future plans, estimates or expectations contemplated by us will be achieved.
Changing the Way
Communities Deal With Waste