Love Your Sourcing Strategy by Letting it Go
Access this presentation where our expert speakers will guide you on how you can responsibly put sourcing into the hands of distributed buyers and empower them to select their suppliers and scale procurement’s impact.
Learn to:
1. To identify the most common fears procurement experiences in the wake of decentralized buying
2. To understand the root cause of those fears so they can be overcome
3. To articulate the advantages (for procurement and the enterprise) of effectively managed distributed buying
1. Access an on-demand webinar
on this topic here: https://zyc.us/2FaQMK3
Love Your Sourcing
Strategy by Letting it Go
2. Love Your Sourcing Strategy by
Letting it Go
Kelly Barner and Richard Waugh
3. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
Today’s Presenters
Kelly Barner
Buyers Meeting Point / Palambridge
Richard Waugh
Zycus, VP Corporate Development
4. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
The Psychology of Fear
5. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
Fear as a Motivator
• Hormesis: a phenomenon by
which something that could
significantly impair or even
kill you in high doses can
make you stronger in low
doses
• Better advance planning
• Willingness to consider more
innovative (if untried) solutions
• More perceptive to signs of
trouble
• Actively open to soliciting and
accepting offers of help
• Amygdala: where fear lives in
the human brain, constantly
on guard to ensure our
survival
• Fear is the most primitive and
powerful human emotion
• Inability to prioritize efforts
• Defensive posturing – unwilling
to consider new ideas or make
changes
• Distrust of others’ help and
suggestions
7. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
Breaking Our Fears Apart
Common types of procurement fear
• Loss of savings
• Loss of standardization
• Loss of control
• Loss of procurement’s role
Source of the fear in procurement’s ‘evolution’
Positive and negative responses to the fear
Advantage to overcoming the fear
Real life examples
8. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
Fear: Loss of Savings
Source: procurement’s primary mandate, “food and shelter”
Positive response: ensure that distributed buyers understand why
they need to save and receive quantifiable reinforcement
Negative response: savings at the
expense of all other benefits,
including innovation and
competitive advantage
Advantage to overcoming this fear:
improved relationships and greater
value creation
14. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
Standardizing End-User, Self-Service “Quick Source” for Tail Spend
Tactical, Spot Buys – 3 Bids & Buy
Create and Invite New Suppliers on the Fly
Create RFQ Inquiry on Single Screen
15. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
Fear: Loss of Standardization
Source: traditional reliance upon
repeated processes flows
Positive response: ensures critical
steps are not skipped
Negative response: lack of all
flexibility, fearing a “slippery slope”
Advantage to overcoming this fear:
new approaches to managing
spend, building supplier
partnerships, and innovating
17. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
Fear: Loss of Control
Source: positioning procurement as responsible for governance and
compliance
Positive response: articulate the freedoms that are beneficial to the
enterprise v. those that are potentially damaging/risky
Negative response: Becoming more controlling, especially when a
natural ‘easing’ has started to take place
Advantage to overcoming this fear: remove procurement from
‘command & control’ role
18. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
Best Practice: Striking Proper Balance Between Control/Efficiency
Source: Hackett Group P2P Performance Study 2017
For Some Purchases a 2-
Way – Not the Traditional
3-Way Match is Optimal.
How Can Approval
Workflows and Buy/Pay
Processes be Optimized
Based On:
• Purchase Type
(Opex/Capex, Project)
• Category
• $ Amount
• BU/Geo/Dept.
19. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
How It Works: Configurable Workflows
Drag and Drop
creation of category-
specific workflows to
govern buy/pay
process
Reduced cycle time
due to
comprehensive,
automated approval
workflow
Real-time,
graphical view of
approval status with
automated alerts
and reminders
22. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
Fear: Loss of Procurement’s Role
Source: increased automation
Positive response: take as an opportunity
to re-create procurement’s role
Negative response: territorial response,
hoarding information, blocking access to
suppliers
Advantage to overcoming this fear:
opening the capacity to take on new
roles, responsibilities, and project types
26. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
Automated request management and tracking triages procurement’s
work queue – empowers and engages end-users
Sophisticated, conditional approval workflows (>175 conditions, 4-5
approvals per form)
Conditional logic integrates IT security reviews with on-boarding
requests
Supports multiple request use cases, e.g. negotiate contract, run
sourcing project, on-board supplier, capital appropriation project
approval
Seamless process flow from request to execution – e.g. approved
request initiates activity in target module
Also supports non-procurement (Hotel, Facilities, HR, IT) requests
Extending
Beyond
Procurement
Users
Integrating
Business
Processes
Customer-
Centric
iRequest - Porsche
Customer-Centric Case Study: Request Management
27. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
How can Procurement more
effectively measure and communicate
performance and value delivered to
the business?
In particular, how can Procurement
align more effectively with Finance to
ensure value contributions are
acknowledged?
Which processes/platforms can
enable Procurement to create
credibility with the C-Suite and sign-
off from the CFO on value delivered?
Source: Key Issues Study, The Hackett Group, 2018
Best Practice: Re-define Procurement Role by Measuring Value
28. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
Challenges
• Most organizations tracking with spreadsheets/home-
grown tools
• Existing tools lack Finance collaboration and approval
workflow
• No standard definition of savings calculation and allocation
methods exists, and lifecycle tracking visibility is missing
Solution
Align:
• Import baseline spend from
Spend Analytics
• Establish Finance-approved
spend baseline and savings
calculation formulae on
common, enterprise
platform
Validate:
• Employ workflow to obtain
validation from stakeholders
• Map savings projects to
stakeholders and approvers
Analyze:
• Segregate savings by type,
e.g. cost reduction vs.
avoidance, and accounting
period
• Identify savings by
project/sourcing strategy
• Map savings impact to P&L,
Balance Sheet, Cash Flow
Source: Gartner/Rutgers Survey
How it Works: Financial Savings Management Challenges/Solutions
29. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
Case Study: Financial Savings Management
600+
Savings Projects Initiated
$40-50M
Annual Incremental Savings Realized To Date
000’s of Users
40 Power Users Create Savings Projects and Collaborate with
000’s of Stakeholders (600 Financial Analysts Alone)
25% Productivity Gain
Category Managers Save 2 Hours per Day from Data Gathering
Tasks
Single Version of Savings Truth
Standardized calculation/allocation formulae
Full audit trail and version control
Secure user access by BU/Div/Dept/Cat
Fx conversion and multi-lingual UI
Flexible/multiple savings types/definitions
Approval workflow sign-off by budget owner and Finance
Dashboard analytics and Financial Statement impact reporting:
P&L/Budget/Balance Sheet,/Cash Flow
Savings Tracking for Non-Procurement
Platform applied to non-procurement savings projects (e.g. Reorg, ERP
Consolidation, M&A), Budgeting/S&OP, Cash Flow Forecasting
iSave - Qualcomm
32. Source to Pay Suite: Spend Analysis | eSourcing | Contract Management | Supplier Management | Savings Management | Project Management | Request Management | Procure-to-Pay
Speaker Contact Information
Kelly Barner
Buyers Meeting Point / Palambridge
Twitter: @BuyersMeetPoint
Email: kelly@buyersmeetingpoint.com
Richard Waugh
Zycus, VP Corporate Development
Twitter: @Zycus
Email: richard.waugh@zycus.com
33. Need more insights?
Access an on-demand webinar
on this topic here: https://zyc.us/2FaQMK3
Follow us on social media for more updates!
Twitter | LinkedIn | Google+ | Xing
34. +1 866 563 9219
info@zycus.com
www.zycus.com
Thank You
Editor's Notes
Fear is a powerful and primitive human emotion. It alerts us to the presence of danger and was critical in keeping our ancestors alive. Fear can actually be divided into two stages, biochemical and emotional. The biochemical response is universal, while the emotional response is highly individualized.
Biochemical Reaction
When we confront a perceived danger, our bodies respond in specific ways. Physical reactions to fear include sweating, increased heart rate, and high adrenaline levels.
This physical response is sometimes known as the “fight or flight” response, in which the body prepares itself to either enter combat or run away.
This biochemical reaction is likely an evolutionary development. It is an automatic response and is crucial to survival.
Emotional Response
The emotional response to fear is highly personalized. Some people are adrenaline junkies, thriving on extreme sports and other fear-inducing thrill situations. Others have a negative reaction to the feeling of fear, avoiding fear-inducing situations at all costs. Although the physical reaction is the same, fear may be perceived as either positive or negative.
Technology exists to make this possible –
eProcurement and integration with Amazon Buyer (for instance)
Preferred supplier lists
Self-sourcing with the right governance
Allows procurement to scale their impact on enterprise spend while also focusing on the largest opportunity, most strategic opportunities.
Physiological needs (Maslow’s hierarchy) are the physical requirements for human survival. If these requirements are not met, the human body cannot function properly and will ultimately fail. Physiological needs are thought to be the most important; they should be met first. This is the first and basic need on the hierarchy of needs. Without them, the other needs cannot follow up.
Advantages to overcoming this fear: procurement should validate that the fear is real by finding quantifiable evidence. Even if there is some loss or leakage, compare it to the potential benefits and assess actual risk.
Source: less standardization of sourcing approaches will make each project a ‘free for all’ and increase procurement’s work while obscuring our mission
Fear that decentralizing purchasing/buying decisions will erode procurement’s control, and result in non-compliant spend
Fear that decentralized procurement (meaning contained supplier selection) will make the C-suite question whether they need a centralized procurement team