Logic5
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•518 views
Inference refers to deriving new knowledge from existing knowledge through logical reasoning. There are two types of inference: antecedent and consequent. Antecedent inference derives a conclusion from premises that come before it, like concluding a house is on fire from seeing smoke. Consequent inference derives a conclusion that follows necessarily from premises, like concluding all men are mortal. Inference can also be mediate, involving multiple premises, or immediate, involving only two propositions. Mediate inference establishes new truths through deduction and induction.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![General Notion on Inference Inference can either be ANTECEDENT or CONSEQUENT ,[object Object],[object Object],e.g. Smoke is pouring out of the windows; the house must be on fire .]()
Recommended
Bipolar Case Study
Loki Laufeyson is a 27-year-old man who presents with symptoms of bipolar II disorder including periods of heightened mood and activity alternating with depression. He has a family history of bipolar disorder and depression. Evaluation finds he meets criteria for bipolar II disorder with periods of hypomania and depression affecting his relationships and work. Treatment is recommended including medication management and psychotherapy.
Hypothetical Syllogism
This document discusses different types of logical syllogisms:
1. Hypothetical syllogism uses a conditional premise and categorical conclusions. There are three types of hypothetical propositions: conditional, disjunctive, and conjunctive.
2. Conditional syllogism uses a conditional premise and its valid forms are modus ponens and modus tollens.
3. Disjunctive syllogism uses a disjunctive premise and its valid forms are ponendo tollens and tollendo ponens.
4. Conjunctive syllogism uses a conjunctive premise stating two choices cannot be true together.
It provides examples and
Case Presentation: substance-induced psychosis
Weekly Post-graduate Case Presentation
Venue: Meeting Room, Psychiatric Clinic, HUSM
Date: 04/07/2000
Defence Mechanism Of Phobia
The document defines and provides examples of various defense mechanisms used by the ego to minimize anxiety and protect itself, including: repression, displacement, projection, rationalization, reaction formation, sublimation, and undoing. It notes that defense mechanisms function to prevent discomfort, lead to economy of effort, and maintain repression of uncomfortable thoughts and feelings.
Square of opposition
The document discusses different types of propositional logic operations including conversion, obversion, and contraposition. It defines each operation, provides examples of how to apply the rules to different proposition forms like A, E, I, and O propositions, and illustrates the steps to derive the converse, obverse, or contrapositive of a given proposition.
Opioid withdrawl
The patient is a 32-year-old male who has been abusing opioids for 11 years. He has a history of withdrawal symptoms when attempting to stop using heroin in the past. A mental status examination found slurred speech, auditory hallucinations, and problems with attention, but intact cognition, judgment, and insight overall. The patient reports taking heroin to relieve withdrawal symptoms and feelings of depression.
Dunning kruger effect
This document summarizes the Dunning-Kruger effect, which is that people who are unskilled in a particular area tend to overestimate their abilities. It references quotes about ignorance from Confucius, Plato, and Mark Twain. It then discusses a scientific study by Justin Kruger and David Dunning that found incompetent people tend to overestimate their skills, fail to recognize skill in others, and are poor at gauging their own incompetence, though training can help them realize they were unskilled. A graph is included showing the relationship between skill level and ability to recognize competence.
Presentation on Panic Disorder
This document discusses panic disorder and presents a therapeutic model using the story of Little Red Riding Hood. It explains that individuals with panic disorder are operating from their "child aspect" without access to their rational "adult" perspectives. The model uses projective storytelling to identify unconscious beliefs and dynamics. Stories are analyzed to reveal themes like confusion between conditional and unconditional love. A 6-phase technique then helps reprocess these patterns by introducing the "missing characters" of Mother, Father and Woodcutter to restore balance and provide new insights and tools for the individual. The goal is to lift panic by helping the inner child find solutions and support through a reconstructed "happy ending."
Recommended
Bipolar Case Study
Loki Laufeyson is a 27-year-old man who presents with symptoms of bipolar II disorder including periods of heightened mood and activity alternating with depression. He has a family history of bipolar disorder and depression. Evaluation finds he meets criteria for bipolar II disorder with periods of hypomania and depression affecting his relationships and work. Treatment is recommended including medication management and psychotherapy.
Hypothetical Syllogism
This document discusses different types of logical syllogisms:
1. Hypothetical syllogism uses a conditional premise and categorical conclusions. There are three types of hypothetical propositions: conditional, disjunctive, and conjunctive.
2. Conditional syllogism uses a conditional premise and its valid forms are modus ponens and modus tollens.
3. Disjunctive syllogism uses a disjunctive premise and its valid forms are ponendo tollens and tollendo ponens.
4. Conjunctive syllogism uses a conjunctive premise stating two choices cannot be true together.
It provides examples and
Case Presentation: substance-induced psychosis
Weekly Post-graduate Case Presentation
Venue: Meeting Room, Psychiatric Clinic, HUSM
Date: 04/07/2000
Defence Mechanism Of Phobia
The document defines and provides examples of various defense mechanisms used by the ego to minimize anxiety and protect itself, including: repression, displacement, projection, rationalization, reaction formation, sublimation, and undoing. It notes that defense mechanisms function to prevent discomfort, lead to economy of effort, and maintain repression of uncomfortable thoughts and feelings.
Square of opposition
The document discusses different types of propositional logic operations including conversion, obversion, and contraposition. It defines each operation, provides examples of how to apply the rules to different proposition forms like A, E, I, and O propositions, and illustrates the steps to derive the converse, obverse, or contrapositive of a given proposition.
Opioid withdrawl
The patient is a 32-year-old male who has been abusing opioids for 11 years. He has a history of withdrawal symptoms when attempting to stop using heroin in the past. A mental status examination found slurred speech, auditory hallucinations, and problems with attention, but intact cognition, judgment, and insight overall. The patient reports taking heroin to relieve withdrawal symptoms and feelings of depression.
Dunning kruger effect
This document summarizes the Dunning-Kruger effect, which is that people who are unskilled in a particular area tend to overestimate their abilities. It references quotes about ignorance from Confucius, Plato, and Mark Twain. It then discusses a scientific study by Justin Kruger and David Dunning that found incompetent people tend to overestimate their skills, fail to recognize skill in others, and are poor at gauging their own incompetence, though training can help them realize they were unskilled. A graph is included showing the relationship between skill level and ability to recognize competence.
Presentation on Panic Disorder
This document discusses panic disorder and presents a therapeutic model using the story of Little Red Riding Hood. It explains that individuals with panic disorder are operating from their "child aspect" without access to their rational "adult" perspectives. The model uses projective storytelling to identify unconscious beliefs and dynamics. Stories are analyzed to reveal themes like confusion between conditional and unconditional love. A 6-phase technique then helps reprocess these patterns by introducing the "missing characters" of Mother, Father and Woodcutter to restore balance and provide new insights and tools for the individual. The goal is to lift panic by helping the inner child find solutions and support through a reconstructed "happy ending."
Electro convulsive therapy
ECT involves inducing a seizure through electrical stimulation of the brain to treat various mental health conditions. It is used when other treatments like medications are not effective or cannot be used. During the procedure, the patient is given anesthesia and muscle relaxants while electrodes are placed on the head to deliver electrical currents and induce a seizure. Nurses play an important role in preparing the patient, monitoring them during treatment, and providing care after to address any side effects like confusion. ECT remains an effective treatment option when other alternatives are not suitable.
Schizophrenia
1. Schizophrenia is a disorder that affects thoughts, feelings and behaviors. It is diagnosed based on symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations that have persisted for at least one month.
2. The causes are unknown but involve both genetic and environmental factors. It often has a devastating social and emotional impact on patients.
3. Treatment involves antipsychotic medications. First generation medications include chlorpromazine and haloperidol. Second generation options include risperidone, clozapine, olanzapine and quetiapine.
Schizophrenia - Psychiatry Case Presentation
J.K. is a 34-year-old man with a 16-year history of schizophrenia who was admitted to the hospital after becoming unpredictable and threatening violence. He had been refusing medications and experiencing auditory hallucinations telling him to harm himself. Upon examination, he displayed symptoms of loose thought processes, depression, and diminished judgment. His condition is thought to have decompensated due to medication noncompliance, which has led to multiple hospital admissions in the past.
Delusions
Normal thinking involves goal-directed progression of ideas and associations leading to rational conclusions. Thought disorders involve errors in this process and can be categorized as disorders of form, progression, content, or possession. Delusions are a type of thought content disorder characterized by false beliefs that are firmly held despite evidence. Conrad proposed a 5-stage model of delusion development including mood changes, search for meaning, heightening of psychosis, formation of a new worldview, and eventual isolation. Delusions are classified based on origin, theme, mood congruence, reality value, and complexity. Common delusional themes include persecution, guilt, infidelity, grandeur, poverty, and somatic or religious beliefs. Case studies demonstrate delusional
Borderline Personality Disorder
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a serious mental illness characterized by unstable moods, behavior, and relationships. It is caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors like childhood trauma. Symptoms include fear of abandonment, unstable relationships, impulsivity, self-harm, and shifting self-image. Treatment focuses on counseling therapies like dialectical behavior therapy to help patients manage emotions and improve relationships.
Symptomatology
This document outlines various psychiatric disorders affecting perception, thought, speech, emotions, motor behavior, memory, attention, orientation, consciousness, judgment, and insight. It describes in detail different types of illusions, hallucinations, formal thought disorders, mood disorders, memory disorders, and disorders of consciousness. The majority of the disorders discussed commonly occur in psychotic disorders like schizophrenia or organic mental conditions. The document provides psychiatric clinicians with definitions and classifications of key symptoms to facilitate diagnosis.
Philo 1 inference
This document discusses the concepts of judgment and proposition in logic. It defines judgment as a mental act of affirming or denying a relationship between two concepts. A proposition is the verbal expression of a judgment. Judgments can be categorical or hypothetical. Categorical propositions relate two terms and can be affirmative or negative. A valid judgment requires thorough understanding of concepts and an objective perception of their relationship. Reasoning involves making inferences, deducing conclusions from premises through immediate or mediate logic. Deductive reasoning proceeds from universal to particular while inductive reasoning proceeds from particular to universal. A categorical syllogism is a three-part argument using deductive reasoning with three terms and two premises leading to a conclusion.
Mathematical Reasoning (unit-5) UGC NET Paper-1 Study Notes (E-books) Down...
This document provides a summary of mathematical reasoning and aptitude topics that are important for the UGC NET exam. It mentions that mathematical reasoning is a very important section that can play a role in whether candidates are selected. It provides summaries, tips, and 200 practice questions for each topic, such as profit and loss, ratios, and more. It is intended to help students practice topics, increase accuracy, and develop a strong understanding to do well on the exam.
Logic Unit Notes
This document summarizes the contributions of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle to Western philosophy and the development of logic. It discusses how Socrates developed the Socratic method of questioning beliefs and ideas. It describes how Plato was Socrates' student and founded the Academy, and how Aristotle was Plato's student and founded his own school, the Lyceum. The document then outlines Aristotle's development of formal logic and the scientific method. It provides examples of deduction, induction, syllogisms, and analyzing assumptions to determine the validity of arguments.
Phil6334 day#4slidesfeb13
This document discusses the traditional problem of induction and attempts to justify the inductive method. It presents Hume's view that induction cannot be justified since we cannot infer general laws from specific cases. Two options are considered: obtain knowledge non-inductively or accept induction is irrational. Popper argues for the first option, proposing scientific theories are conjectures subject to falsification, not verification. He claims induction is not needed if we tentatively accept the best theories until falsified. While this avoids Hume's problem, critics argue falsifiability is too weak a criterion and background assumptions are needed for tests. Overall, the document examines Hume's skepticism of induction and Popper's attempt to justify scientific reasoning without relying on induction
3 Logic.pptx
This document discusses the nature of reasoning and syllogisms. It begins by defining judgments and propositions, noting that judgments connect two ideas. It then discusses the human mind's desire to discover new truths beyond direct perceptions, leading to the introduction of reasoning as the third act of the mind. Reasoning is defined as arriving at a new truth from known truths using mediate inference between judgments. The document goes on to define deductive and inductive reasoning, and then focuses on categorical syllogisms as a form of deductive argument. It provides examples of syllogisms and explains the fundamental principles of identity/non-identity between terms.
Lecture 3 Reasoning
This document provides an introduction to critical thinking and the differences between deductive and inductive reasoning. It defines logic and reasoning, and explains that deductive reasoning moves from general premises to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations. Examples of each type of reasoning are provided. The key differences are that deductive reasoning establishes absolute truths if the premises are true, while inductive reasoning reaches tentative conclusions.
Induction & deduction
The document discusses inductive and deductive approaches to research. Deductive reasoning moves from general premises to more specific conclusions, taking a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories in a "bottom-up" approach. Arguments based on rules and principles use deduction, while observations tend to use induction. While deduction leads to certain conclusions, induction draws conclusions that are probable but not certain from observations.
Inductive Essay Examples
Inductive Approach
Mills Inductive Reasoning Essay
Essay On Induction
Induction Reasoning
Inductive Argument Paper
Inductive & Deductive Research
Inductive Argument
Reasoning in AI.pdf
The document discusses different types of reasoning in artificial intelligence, including deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, abductive reasoning, common sense reasoning, monotonic reasoning, and non-monotonic reasoning. Deductive reasoning uses known facts to logically deduce conclusions, while inductive reasoning uses specific observations to derive general conclusions. The key difference between deductive and inductive reasoning is that deductive reasoning conclusions are certain if the premises are true, whereas inductive conclusions are probable even if the premises are true.
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...
This document provides an outline for a class on apologetics and whether absolute truth exists. It discusses various topics like understanding truth, how truth is known through logic and science, and evidence for God's existence. Key points made include that truth is absolute and not dependent on feelings, logical arguments can be valid but premises still require verification, and effects like the universe's beginning and design can point to a creator God through inductive reasoning.
Lecture # 3 a logical theory
This document summarizes a lecture on logical theories that was given by Dr. Akhlas Ahmed. It introduces the concepts of arguments, premises, conclusions, deductive arguments, and inductive arguments. A deductive argument aims to establish a conclusion as certainly true, while an inductive argument claims a conclusion is likely or probable but not certain. The document provides examples of valid and invalid deductive arguments, as well as sound versus unsound arguments. It concludes with examples for a class activity.
Reason and logic
1. The document discusses different types of reasoning, including deductive reasoning which moves from general premises to specific conclusions, and inductive reasoning which moves from specific observations to general conclusions.
2. It notes that while deductive reasoning can provide certainty, the truth of conclusions relies on the truth of premises, which are often based on inductive generalizations.
3. The story of the inductive turkeys is used to show that even well-established generalizations based on induction could potentially be wrong, as their situation unexpectedly changed. This demonstrates limitations of both deduction and induction.
logic
1. Sherlock Holmes deduces that the thief who stole the racehorse could not have been a stranger because the watchdog did not bark, indicating the thief was known to the dog.
2. Deductive reasoning moves from general premises to reach a specific conclusion, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations.
3. However, inductive and deductive reasoning both have limitations, as conclusions based on reasoning could turn out to be incorrect if premises are flawed or observations prove inadequate.
Understanding arguments, reasoning and hypotheses
As researchers working in government, influencing service design, we need to know that our research is methodologically sound, our research findings are grounded in empirical data and our recommendations are logically derived.
'Understanding arguments, reasoning and hypotheses' is the first in a series of 5 short courses, covering introduction courses to various aspects of methodology in research, from the use of grounded theory in discovery research, to hypothesis testing and sampling in more experimental research.
In this course, you'll learn:
About arguments
- what we mean by an argument
- how to identify a valid/invalid argument
- what we mean by premises
- what validity and soundness of arguments mean
About reasoning
- what is deductive reasoning and where do we use it
- what is inductive reasoning and where do we use it
- what is abductive reasoning and where do we use it
About hypotheses
- what is a hypotheses and a null hypothesis
- how do we test them
More Related Content
What's hot
Electro convulsive therapy
ECT involves inducing a seizure through electrical stimulation of the brain to treat various mental health conditions. It is used when other treatments like medications are not effective or cannot be used. During the procedure, the patient is given anesthesia and muscle relaxants while electrodes are placed on the head to deliver electrical currents and induce a seizure. Nurses play an important role in preparing the patient, monitoring them during treatment, and providing care after to address any side effects like confusion. ECT remains an effective treatment option when other alternatives are not suitable.
Schizophrenia
1. Schizophrenia is a disorder that affects thoughts, feelings and behaviors. It is diagnosed based on symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations that have persisted for at least one month.
2. The causes are unknown but involve both genetic and environmental factors. It often has a devastating social and emotional impact on patients.
3. Treatment involves antipsychotic medications. First generation medications include chlorpromazine and haloperidol. Second generation options include risperidone, clozapine, olanzapine and quetiapine.
Schizophrenia - Psychiatry Case Presentation
J.K. is a 34-year-old man with a 16-year history of schizophrenia who was admitted to the hospital after becoming unpredictable and threatening violence. He had been refusing medications and experiencing auditory hallucinations telling him to harm himself. Upon examination, he displayed symptoms of loose thought processes, depression, and diminished judgment. His condition is thought to have decompensated due to medication noncompliance, which has led to multiple hospital admissions in the past.
Delusions
Normal thinking involves goal-directed progression of ideas and associations leading to rational conclusions. Thought disorders involve errors in this process and can be categorized as disorders of form, progression, content, or possession. Delusions are a type of thought content disorder characterized by false beliefs that are firmly held despite evidence. Conrad proposed a 5-stage model of delusion development including mood changes, search for meaning, heightening of psychosis, formation of a new worldview, and eventual isolation. Delusions are classified based on origin, theme, mood congruence, reality value, and complexity. Common delusional themes include persecution, guilt, infidelity, grandeur, poverty, and somatic or religious beliefs. Case studies demonstrate delusional
Borderline Personality Disorder
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a serious mental illness characterized by unstable moods, behavior, and relationships. It is caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors like childhood trauma. Symptoms include fear of abandonment, unstable relationships, impulsivity, self-harm, and shifting self-image. Treatment focuses on counseling therapies like dialectical behavior therapy to help patients manage emotions and improve relationships.
Symptomatology
This document outlines various psychiatric disorders affecting perception, thought, speech, emotions, motor behavior, memory, attention, orientation, consciousness, judgment, and insight. It describes in detail different types of illusions, hallucinations, formal thought disorders, mood disorders, memory disorders, and disorders of consciousness. The majority of the disorders discussed commonly occur in psychotic disorders like schizophrenia or organic mental conditions. The document provides psychiatric clinicians with definitions and classifications of key symptoms to facilitate diagnosis.
What's hot (7)
Similar to Logic5
Philo 1 inference
This document discusses the concepts of judgment and proposition in logic. It defines judgment as a mental act of affirming or denying a relationship between two concepts. A proposition is the verbal expression of a judgment. Judgments can be categorical or hypothetical. Categorical propositions relate two terms and can be affirmative or negative. A valid judgment requires thorough understanding of concepts and an objective perception of their relationship. Reasoning involves making inferences, deducing conclusions from premises through immediate or mediate logic. Deductive reasoning proceeds from universal to particular while inductive reasoning proceeds from particular to universal. A categorical syllogism is a three-part argument using deductive reasoning with three terms and two premises leading to a conclusion.
Mathematical Reasoning (unit-5) UGC NET Paper-1 Study Notes (E-books) Down...
This document provides a summary of mathematical reasoning and aptitude topics that are important for the UGC NET exam. It mentions that mathematical reasoning is a very important section that can play a role in whether candidates are selected. It provides summaries, tips, and 200 practice questions for each topic, such as profit and loss, ratios, and more. It is intended to help students practice topics, increase accuracy, and develop a strong understanding to do well on the exam.
Logic Unit Notes
This document summarizes the contributions of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle to Western philosophy and the development of logic. It discusses how Socrates developed the Socratic method of questioning beliefs and ideas. It describes how Plato was Socrates' student and founded the Academy, and how Aristotle was Plato's student and founded his own school, the Lyceum. The document then outlines Aristotle's development of formal logic and the scientific method. It provides examples of deduction, induction, syllogisms, and analyzing assumptions to determine the validity of arguments.
Phil6334 day#4slidesfeb13
This document discusses the traditional problem of induction and attempts to justify the inductive method. It presents Hume's view that induction cannot be justified since we cannot infer general laws from specific cases. Two options are considered: obtain knowledge non-inductively or accept induction is irrational. Popper argues for the first option, proposing scientific theories are conjectures subject to falsification, not verification. He claims induction is not needed if we tentatively accept the best theories until falsified. While this avoids Hume's problem, critics argue falsifiability is too weak a criterion and background assumptions are needed for tests. Overall, the document examines Hume's skepticism of induction and Popper's attempt to justify scientific reasoning without relying on induction
3 Logic.pptx
This document discusses the nature of reasoning and syllogisms. It begins by defining judgments and propositions, noting that judgments connect two ideas. It then discusses the human mind's desire to discover new truths beyond direct perceptions, leading to the introduction of reasoning as the third act of the mind. Reasoning is defined as arriving at a new truth from known truths using mediate inference between judgments. The document goes on to define deductive and inductive reasoning, and then focuses on categorical syllogisms as a form of deductive argument. It provides examples of syllogisms and explains the fundamental principles of identity/non-identity between terms.
Lecture 3 Reasoning
This document provides an introduction to critical thinking and the differences between deductive and inductive reasoning. It defines logic and reasoning, and explains that deductive reasoning moves from general premises to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations. Examples of each type of reasoning are provided. The key differences are that deductive reasoning establishes absolute truths if the premises are true, while inductive reasoning reaches tentative conclusions.
Induction & deduction
The document discusses inductive and deductive approaches to research. Deductive reasoning moves from general premises to more specific conclusions, taking a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories in a "bottom-up" approach. Arguments based on rules and principles use deduction, while observations tend to use induction. While deduction leads to certain conclusions, induction draws conclusions that are probable but not certain from observations.
Inductive Essay Examples
Inductive Approach
Mills Inductive Reasoning Essay
Essay On Induction
Induction Reasoning
Inductive Argument Paper
Inductive & Deductive Research
Inductive Argument
Reasoning in AI.pdf
The document discusses different types of reasoning in artificial intelligence, including deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, abductive reasoning, common sense reasoning, monotonic reasoning, and non-monotonic reasoning. Deductive reasoning uses known facts to logically deduce conclusions, while inductive reasoning uses specific observations to derive general conclusions. The key difference between deductive and inductive reasoning is that deductive reasoning conclusions are certain if the premises are true, whereas inductive conclusions are probable even if the premises are true.
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...
This document provides an outline for a class on apologetics and whether absolute truth exists. It discusses various topics like understanding truth, how truth is known through logic and science, and evidence for God's existence. Key points made include that truth is absolute and not dependent on feelings, logical arguments can be valid but premises still require verification, and effects like the universe's beginning and design can point to a creator God through inductive reasoning.
Lecture # 3 a logical theory
This document summarizes a lecture on logical theories that was given by Dr. Akhlas Ahmed. It introduces the concepts of arguments, premises, conclusions, deductive arguments, and inductive arguments. A deductive argument aims to establish a conclusion as certainly true, while an inductive argument claims a conclusion is likely or probable but not certain. The document provides examples of valid and invalid deductive arguments, as well as sound versus unsound arguments. It concludes with examples for a class activity.
Reason and logic
1. The document discusses different types of reasoning, including deductive reasoning which moves from general premises to specific conclusions, and inductive reasoning which moves from specific observations to general conclusions.
2. It notes that while deductive reasoning can provide certainty, the truth of conclusions relies on the truth of premises, which are often based on inductive generalizations.
3. The story of the inductive turkeys is used to show that even well-established generalizations based on induction could potentially be wrong, as their situation unexpectedly changed. This demonstrates limitations of both deduction and induction.
logic
1. Sherlock Holmes deduces that the thief who stole the racehorse could not have been a stranger because the watchdog did not bark, indicating the thief was known to the dog.
2. Deductive reasoning moves from general premises to reach a specific conclusion, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations.
3. However, inductive and deductive reasoning both have limitations, as conclusions based on reasoning could turn out to be incorrect if premises are flawed or observations prove inadequate.
Understanding arguments, reasoning and hypotheses
As researchers working in government, influencing service design, we need to know that our research is methodologically sound, our research findings are grounded in empirical data and our recommendations are logically derived.
'Understanding arguments, reasoning and hypotheses' is the first in a series of 5 short courses, covering introduction courses to various aspects of methodology in research, from the use of grounded theory in discovery research, to hypothesis testing and sampling in more experimental research.
In this course, you'll learn:
About arguments
- what we mean by an argument
- how to identify a valid/invalid argument
- what we mean by premises
- what validity and soundness of arguments mean
About reasoning
- what is deductive reasoning and where do we use it
- what is inductive reasoning and where do we use it
- what is abductive reasoning and where do we use it
About hypotheses
- what is a hypotheses and a null hypothesis
- how do we test them
Notes for logic
1. The document discusses the key concepts of logic including arguments, propositions, premises, conclusions and the validity of arguments.
2. It provides examples to illustrate inductive and deductive arguments, and distinguishes between arguments and explanations.
3. Arguments are considered valid if the truth of the premises necessarily implies the truth of the conclusion, while invalid arguments can have true premises and conclusions but the conclusion does not logically follow.
Introdutory presentation on Reason for Tok
1. Reason involves using logic and evidence to draw conclusions, while avoiding hasty generalizations.
2. There are two types of logic: deductive reasoning draws certain conclusions, while inductive reasoning draws probable but uncertain conclusions from evidence.
3. Relying solely on reason and logic has limitations, as mathematics and rational proofs may not provide practical knowledge for daily life, and religious faith transcends reason.
Unit 1. What can we know?
This document discusses different views of science and how knowledge is obtained. It contrasts the rationalist view that knowledge can be obtained through reasoning alone (deduction) with the empiricist view that all knowledge comes from sensory experience and induction. Rationalism is illustrated by Descartes' view that one can doubt senses but not one's own existence ("I think therefore I am"). Empiricism and induction are discussed through David Hume's argument that we can never be certain that what is true of some observations of the world will hold for all cases, as with assuming all swans are white based on observing many white swans. The document questions if induction provides very good but not certain reasons to expect patterns in nature to continue.
Philosophers/Deduction/Induction
The document summarizes the key philosophers Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle and their foundational contributions to Western philosophy and logic. It discusses that Socrates developed the Socratic method of questioning beliefs to develop ideas. Plato was Socrates' student and founded The Academy, while Aristotle studied almost every topic and founded his own school, the Lyceum. Aristotle is noted for developing logical thinking through rules like syllogisms and the scientific method.
Inductive Essay
Essay On Induction
Inductive Argument
Inductive Approach
Inductive & Deductive Research
Inductive Bible Study Essay
Inductive Argument Paper
Similar to Logic5 (20)
Mathematical Reasoning (unit-5) UGC NET Paper-1 Study Notes (E-books) Down...
Mathematical Reasoning (unit-5) UGC NET Paper-1 Study Notes (E-books) Down...
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...
More from Jose Destura Jr
Logic4
The document discusses several philosophical theories of knowledge:
1) Empiricism claims knowledge comes from sense experience, while rationalism claims ideas are formed through reason alone.
2) Skepticism doubts the possibility of certain knowledge from senses or reason.
3) Correspondence theory holds that true beliefs correspond to reality while false beliefs do not. It is criticized for not allowing for false beliefs.
4) Pragmatic theory claims ideas are true if they have practical and desirable consequences. It is criticized for allowing truth to vary between individuals.
5) Coherence theory holds a set of beliefs is true if consistent and does not contradict other knowledge.
Logic5
Inference can be defined as deriving new knowledge from existing knowledge through logical reasoning. There are two types of inference: antecedent and consequent. Antecedent inference derives a conclusion from premises where the truth of the premises implies the truth of the conclusion. Consequent inference derives a conclusion from premises where the falsity of the conclusion implies the falsity of one or more premises. Inference can also be mediate, involving reasoning through a third or middle term, or immediate, involving reasoning directly from one proposition to another without an intermediate step. Mediate inference includes deduction, reasoning from general to specific, and induction, reasoning from specific examples to general conclusions.
Logic4
The document discusses several philosophical theories of knowledge:
1) Empiricism claims knowledge comes from sense experience, while rationalism claims ideas are formed through reason alone.
2) Skepticism doubts the possibility of certain knowledge from senses or reason.
3) Correspondence theory holds that true beliefs correspond to reality while false beliefs do not. It is criticized for not allowing for false beliefs.
4) Pragmatic theory claims ideas are true if they have practical and desirable consequences. It is criticized for allowing truth to vary between individuals.
5) Coherence theory holds a set of beliefs is true if consistent and does not contradict other knowledge.
Logic hand outs#4
...not only for your eyes but for your internal senses as well...
may it be converted by into concepts & ideas of your possible intellect...ciao!
Logic hand outs#3
The document discusses judgment, which it defines as the act of affirming or denying something about a subject. It has two components: the comparison of two concepts and the pronouncement of their agreement or disagreement. Judgment results in propositions that express the relationship between a subject and its attributes. Reasoning is described as advancing to new truths or judgments through the use of prior judgments. The two methods of reasoning are induction, reasoning from specific examples to general principles, and deduction, reasoning from universal principles to specific conclusions.
Logic hand outs#2
The process of intellectualization refers to ideogenesis or the formation of ideas. It involves the intellect functioning without bodily organs to know the essence and substance of realities, beyond just their accidental qualities, by making use of sensory data. The intellect forms abstract and universal concepts from particular sensible realities. This requires the external senses to first provide perceptual information to the common sense and imagination, which form phantasms containing individuating characteristics. The intellect then discards these characteristics to abstract the nature through the possible intellect, which is understood by the agent intellect to form an idea or concept representing the being or essence of the object known.
More from Jose Destura Jr (6)
Recently uploaded
The Hope of Salvation - Jude 1:24-25 - Message
Jude gives us hope at the end of a dark letter. In a dark world like today, we need the light of Christ to shine brighter and brighter. Jude shows us where to fix our focus so we can be filled with God's goodness and glory. Join us to explore this incredible passage.
A Free eBook ~ Valuable LIFE Lessons to Learn ( 5 Sets of Presentations)...
A free eBook comprising 5 sets of PowerPoint presentations of meaningful stories /Inspirational pieces that teach important Dhamma/Life lessons. For reflection and practice to develop the mind to grow in love, compassion and wisdom. The texts are in English and Chinese.
My other free eBooks can be obtained from the following Links:
https://www.slideshare.net/ohteikbin/presentations
https://www.slideshare.net/ohteikbin/documents
English - The Book of Ruth - King James Bible.pdf
The Book of Ruth is included in the third division, or the Writings, of the Hebrew Bible. In most Christian canons it is treated as one of the historical books and placed between Judges and 1 Samuel.
A375 Example Taste the taste of the Lord, the taste of the Lord The taste of...
It seems that current missionary work requires spending a lot of money, preparing a lot of materials, and traveling to far away places, so that it feels like missionary work. But what was the result they brought back? It's just a lot of photos of activities, fun eating, drinking and some playing games. And then we have to do the same thing next year, never ending. The church once mentioned that a certain missionary would go to the field where she used to work before the end of his life. It seemed that if she had not gone, no one would be willing to go. The reason why these missionary work is so difficult is that no one obeys God’s words, and the Bible is not the main content during missionary work, because in the eyes of those who do not obey God’s words, the Bible is just words and cannot be connected with life, so Reading out God's words is boring because it doesn't have any life experience, so it cannot be connected with human life. I will give a few examples in the hope that this situation can be changed. A375
Vertical Church Kyiv Report 2022-2023: Church at war
Please, join us in praising God for His incredible blessings!
Kala jadu (black magic) expert,Black magic specialist in Dubai vashikaran spe...
For all problem solutions just contact with Amil baba Fareed Bangali +923217066670 #vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore#blackmagicformarriage #aamilbaba #kalajadu #kalailam #taweez #wazifaexpert #jadumantar #vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabaiAmitabha in the United Kingdom, Amitabha in Spain, Amitabha in Dubai, Amitabha in Norway, Amitabha in Krachi, Amitabha in Lahore, Amitabha in Gujranwalan, Amitabha in Islamabad #blackmagicforlove #blackmagicformarriage #aamilbaba #kalajadu #kalailam #taweez #wazifaexpert #jadumantar #vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #kalajaduspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore
#kalajadu #Kalailam #BangaliAmilbaba #Blackmagic #Astrologer
312 A Wise Woman of Abel Beth Maakah Saves The Town
Sermon adapted from, Discovering Christ Day by Day, David Fortner
The_Chronological_Life_of_Christ_Part_104_Repentance_and_Restoration
The heart of the Father is to restore those who come with repentance.
快速办理(PU毕业证书)普渡大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(PU毕业证书)普渡大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
2. The Book of Psalms: Recognition of the kingship and sovereignty of God
2. The Book of Psalms: Recognition of the kingship and sovereignty of GodCOACH International Ministries
Recognition of the kingship and sovereignty of GodThe Enchantment and Shadows_ Unveiling the Mysteries of Magic and Black Magic...
This manual will guide you through basic skills and tasks to help you get started with various aspects of Magic. Each section is designed to be easy to follow, with step-by-step instructions.
How to Stop a Divorce and Save Your Marriage: Divorce Spells That Really Work...
How to Stop a Divorce and Save Your Marriage: Divorce Spells That Really Work...Traditional Healer, Love Spells Caster and Money Spells That Work Fast
The forces involved in this witchcraft spell will re-establish the loving bond between you and help to build a strong, loving relationship from which to start anew. Despite any previous hardships or problems, the spell work will re-establish the strong bonds of friendship and love upon which the marriage and relationship originated. Have faith, these stop divorce and stop separation spells are extremely powerful and will reconnect you and your partner in a strong and harmonious relationship.
My ritual will not only stop separation and divorce, but rebuild a strong bond between you and your partner that is based on truth, honesty, and unconditional love. For an even stronger effect, you may want to consider using the Eternal Love Bond spell to ensure your relationship and love will last through all tests of time. If you have not yet determined if your partner is considering separation or divorce, but are aware of rifts in the relationship, try the Love Spells to remove problems in a relationship or marriage. Keep in mind that all my love spells are 100% customized and that you'll only need 1 spell to address all problems/wishes.
Save your marriage from divorce & make your relationship stronger using anti divorce spells to make him or her fall back in love with you. End your marriage if you are no longer in love with your husband or wife. Permanently end your marriage using divorce spells that work fast. Protect your marriage from divorce using love spells to boost commitment, love & bind your hearts together for a stronger marriage that will last. Get your ex lover who has remarried using divorce spells to break up a couple & make your ex lost lover come back to you permanently.
Visit https://www.profbalaj.com/love-spells-loves-spells-that-work/
Call/WhatsApp +27836633417 for more info.Sanatan Vastu | Experience Great Living | Vastu Expert
Santan Vastu Provides Vedic astrology courses & Vastu remedies, If you are searching Vastu for home, Vastu for kitchen, Vastu for house, Vastu for Office & Factory. Best Vastu in Bahadurgarh. Best Vastu in Delhi NCR
Why is this So? ~ Do Seek to KNOW (English & Chinese).pptx
A PowerPoint Presentation based on the Dhamma teaching of Kamma-Vipaka (Intentional Actions-Ripening Effects).
A Presentation for developing morality, concentration and wisdom and to spur us to practice the Dhamma diligently.
The texts are in English and Chinese.
Recently uploaded (17)
A Free eBook ~ Valuable LIFE Lessons to Learn ( 5 Sets of Presentations)...
A Free eBook ~ Valuable LIFE Lessons to Learn ( 5 Sets of Presentations)...
A375 Example Taste the taste of the Lord, the taste of the Lord The taste of...
A375 Example Taste the taste of the Lord, the taste of the Lord The taste of...
Vertical Church Kyiv Report 2022-2023: Church at war
Vertical Church Kyiv Report 2022-2023: Church at war
Kala jadu (black magic) expert,Black magic specialist in Dubai vashikaran spe...
Kala jadu (black magic) expert,Black magic specialist in Dubai vashikaran spe...
312 A Wise Woman of Abel Beth Maakah Saves The Town
312 A Wise Woman of Abel Beth Maakah Saves The Town
The_Chronological_Life_of_Christ_Part_104_Repentance_and_Restoration
The_Chronological_Life_of_Christ_Part_104_Repentance_and_Restoration
2. The Book of Psalms: Recognition of the kingship and sovereignty of God
2. The Book of Psalms: Recognition of the kingship and sovereignty of God
The Enchantment and Shadows_ Unveiling the Mysteries of Magic and Black Magic...
The Enchantment and Shadows_ Unveiling the Mysteries of Magic and Black Magic...
How to Stop a Divorce and Save Your Marriage: Divorce Spells That Really Work...
How to Stop a Divorce and Save Your Marriage: Divorce Spells That Really Work...
Sanatan Vastu | Experience Great Living | Vastu Expert
Sanatan Vastu | Experience Great Living | Vastu Expert
Why is this So? ~ Do Seek to KNOW (English & Chinese).pptx
Why is this So? ~ Do Seek to KNOW (English & Chinese).pptx
Logic5
- 1. General Notion on Inference Signifies any process by which the mind proceeds from one or more propositions to other propositions Signifies the operation by which the mind gets new knowledge by drawing out the implications of what it already knows
- 7. Thanks a lot folks for listening!