The Stanford Workshop focused on creating plans to expedite a shift in how knowledge and information resources are managed and discovered through linked data. The goal was to identify capabilities and design new tools, processes, and systems that move beyond current metadata practices to link related resources and provide improved navigation and discovery through open feedback. A number of organizations from around the world participated in the workshop to discuss these issues.
Presented at the Northern Ohio Technical Services Librarians' meeting, November 22, 2013. Describes why libraries should move toward a linked data future to enable their resources to be discoverable on the open web, and includes lessons learned from developing the eXtensible Catalog at the University of Rochester.
Linked Data Love: research representation, discovery, and assessment
#ALAAC15
The explosion of linked data platforms and data stores over the last five years has been profound – both in terms of quantity of data as well as its potential impact. Research information systems such as VIVO (www.vivoweb.org) play a significant role in enabling this work. VIVO is an open source, Semantic Web-based application that provides an integrated, searchable view of the scholarly activities of an organization. The uniform semantic structure of VIVO-ISF data enables a new class of tools to advance science. This presentation will provide a brief introduction and update to VIVO and present ways that this semantically-rich data can enable visualizations, reporting and assessment, next-generation collaboration and team building, and enhanced multi-site search. Libraries are uniquely positioned to facilitate the open representation of research information and its subsequent use to spur collaboration, discovery, and assessment. The talk will conclude with a description of ways librarians are engaged in this work – including visioning, metadata and ontology creation, policy creation, data curation and management, technical, and engagement activities.
Kristi Holmes, PhD
Director, Galter Health Sciences Library
Director of Evaluation, NUCATS
Associate Professor, Preventive Medicine-Health and Biomedical Informatics
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
A presentation given at the "Data Stewardship: Increasing the Integrity and Effectiveness of Science and Scholarship" Session on Friday, June 8 2012 at the IASSIT 2012 conference in Washington DC.
This presentation introduced data publishing, using a social science (archaeology) case study to explore editorial processes and dissemination outcomes that increasingly demand “Linked Data” capabilities.
Brown Bag: New Models of Scholarly Communication for Digital Scholarship, by ...Micah Altman
In his talk for the MIT Libraries Program on Information Science, Steve Griffin discusses how how research libraries can play a key and expanded role in enabling digital scholarship and creating the supporting activities that sustain it.
Web of Data as a Solution for Interoperability. Case StudiesSabin Buraga
The paper draws several considerations regarding the use of Web of Data (Semantic Web) technologies – such as metadata vocabularies and ontological constructs – to increase the degree of interoperability within distributed systems. A number of case studies are presenting to express the knowledge in a
platform- and programming language-independent manner.
Semantic Web & Information Brokering: Opportunities, Commercialization and Ch...Amit Sheth
Amit Sheth, "Semantic Web & Info. Brokering Opportunities, Commercialization and Challenges," Keynote talk at the workshop on Semantic Web: Models, Architecture and Management, September 21, 2000, Lisbon, Portugal.
This was the keynote given at probably the first international event with "Semantic Web" in title (and before the well known SciAm article). As in TBL's use of Semantic Web in his 1999 book, (semantic) metadata plays central role. The use of Worldmodel/Ontology is consistent with our use of ontology for (Web) information integration in 1994 CIKM paper. Summary of the talk by event organizers and other details are at: http://knoesis.org/library/resource.php?id=735
Prof. Sheth started a Semantic Web company Taalee, Inc. in 1999 (product was called MediaAnywhere A/V search engine- discussed in this paper in the context of one of its use by a customer Redband Broadcasting). The product included Semantic Web/populated Ontology based semantic (faceted) search, semantic browsing, semantic personalization, semantic targeting (advertisement), etc as is described in U.S. Patent #6311194, 30 Oct. 2001 (filed 2000). MediaAnywhere has about 25 ontologies in News/Business, Sports, Entertainment, etc.
Taalee merged to become Voquette in 2001 (product was called SCORE), Semagix in 2004 (product was called Semagix Freedom), and then Fortent in 2006 (products included Know Your Customers).
Presented at the Northern Ohio Technical Services Librarians' meeting, November 22, 2013. Describes why libraries should move toward a linked data future to enable their resources to be discoverable on the open web, and includes lessons learned from developing the eXtensible Catalog at the University of Rochester.
Linked Data Love: research representation, discovery, and assessment
#ALAAC15
The explosion of linked data platforms and data stores over the last five years has been profound – both in terms of quantity of data as well as its potential impact. Research information systems such as VIVO (www.vivoweb.org) play a significant role in enabling this work. VIVO is an open source, Semantic Web-based application that provides an integrated, searchable view of the scholarly activities of an organization. The uniform semantic structure of VIVO-ISF data enables a new class of tools to advance science. This presentation will provide a brief introduction and update to VIVO and present ways that this semantically-rich data can enable visualizations, reporting and assessment, next-generation collaboration and team building, and enhanced multi-site search. Libraries are uniquely positioned to facilitate the open representation of research information and its subsequent use to spur collaboration, discovery, and assessment. The talk will conclude with a description of ways librarians are engaged in this work – including visioning, metadata and ontology creation, policy creation, data curation and management, technical, and engagement activities.
Kristi Holmes, PhD
Director, Galter Health Sciences Library
Director of Evaluation, NUCATS
Associate Professor, Preventive Medicine-Health and Biomedical Informatics
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
A presentation given at the "Data Stewardship: Increasing the Integrity and Effectiveness of Science and Scholarship" Session on Friday, June 8 2012 at the IASSIT 2012 conference in Washington DC.
This presentation introduced data publishing, using a social science (archaeology) case study to explore editorial processes and dissemination outcomes that increasingly demand “Linked Data” capabilities.
Brown Bag: New Models of Scholarly Communication for Digital Scholarship, by ...Micah Altman
In his talk for the MIT Libraries Program on Information Science, Steve Griffin discusses how how research libraries can play a key and expanded role in enabling digital scholarship and creating the supporting activities that sustain it.
Web of Data as a Solution for Interoperability. Case StudiesSabin Buraga
The paper draws several considerations regarding the use of Web of Data (Semantic Web) technologies – such as metadata vocabularies and ontological constructs – to increase the degree of interoperability within distributed systems. A number of case studies are presenting to express the knowledge in a
platform- and programming language-independent manner.
Semantic Web & Information Brokering: Opportunities, Commercialization and Ch...Amit Sheth
Amit Sheth, "Semantic Web & Info. Brokering Opportunities, Commercialization and Challenges," Keynote talk at the workshop on Semantic Web: Models, Architecture and Management, September 21, 2000, Lisbon, Portugal.
This was the keynote given at probably the first international event with "Semantic Web" in title (and before the well known SciAm article). As in TBL's use of Semantic Web in his 1999 book, (semantic) metadata plays central role. The use of Worldmodel/Ontology is consistent with our use of ontology for (Web) information integration in 1994 CIKM paper. Summary of the talk by event organizers and other details are at: http://knoesis.org/library/resource.php?id=735
Prof. Sheth started a Semantic Web company Taalee, Inc. in 1999 (product was called MediaAnywhere A/V search engine- discussed in this paper in the context of one of its use by a customer Redband Broadcasting). The product included Semantic Web/populated Ontology based semantic (faceted) search, semantic browsing, semantic personalization, semantic targeting (advertisement), etc as is described in U.S. Patent #6311194, 30 Oct. 2001 (filed 2000). MediaAnywhere has about 25 ontologies in News/Business, Sports, Entertainment, etc.
Taalee merged to become Voquette in 2001 (product was called SCORE), Semagix in 2004 (product was called Semagix Freedom), and then Fortent in 2006 (products included Know Your Customers).
Social metadata for libraries, archives and museums: Research findings from t...Rose Holley
The presentative gives research findings from the Research Libraries Group (RLG) on Social Metadata Working Group. The group worked from 2009-2010 researching sites that used social media features before making some recommendations to libraries, archives and museums.
Scholars@Cornell: Visualizing the Scholarship DataMuhammad Javed
Short paper published in IEEE Visualizations in Practice workshop. Phoenix, AZ.
A new project of CUL is Scholars@Cornell, a data and visualization service built upon VIVO’s semantic, linked data knowledge-base that represents the record of scholarship produced by Cornell faculty and researchers. While adhering to the VIVO ontology, our work on Scholars@Cornell helps move VIVO forward in the technology areas that require a looser coupling of backend and frontend technologies. One key question we set out to answer was “how can visual mediation help users navigate the rich semantic data that represent the scholarship data recorded in VIVO knowledge-base?” Can visualizations be used to make the content more consumable and answer the questions that cannot easily be answered by browsing list views.
RDAP 15: Research Data Integration in the Purdue LibrariesASIS&T
Research Data Access and Preservation Summit, 2015
Minneapolis, MN
April 22-23, 2015
Lisa Zilinski, Data Specialist, Carnegie Mellon University
Amy Barton, Metadata Specialist, Purdue
Tao Zhang, Digital User Experience Specialist, Purdue
Line Pouchard, Computational Science Information Specialist, Purdue
Pete E. Pascuzzi, Molecular Biosciences Information Specialist, Purdue
Looking beyond plain text for document representation in the enterpriseArjen de Vries
In many real life scenarios, searching for information is not the user's end goal. In this presentation I look into the specific example of corporate strategy and business development in a university setting.
In today's academic institutions, strategic questions are those that relate to dependency on funding instruments, the public private partnerships that exist (and those that should be extended!), and the match between topic areas addressed by the research staff and those claimed important by policy makers. The professional search tasks encountered to answer questions in this domain are usually addressed by business intelligence (BI) tools, and not by search engines. However, professionals are known to be busy people inspired by their own research interests, and not particularly fond of keeping the
customer relationship management (CRM) or knowledge management systems up to date for the organisation's strategic interest. This then results in incomplete and inaccurate data.
Instead of requiring research staff (or their administrative support) to provide this management information, I will illustrate by example how the desired information usually exists already in the documents inherent to the academic work process. Information retrieval could thus play an important role in the computer systems that support the business analytics involved, and could significantly improve the coverage of entities of interest - i.e., to reduce the effort involved in achieving good recall in business analytics. The ranking functionality over the enterprise's (textual) content should however not be an isolated component. Our example setting integrates the information derived from research proposals, research publications and the financial systems, providing an excellent motivation for a more unified approach to structured and unstructured data.
Social media sites (by some referred to as the web 2.0) allow their users to interact with each other, for example in collecting and sharing so-called user-generated content - these can be just bookmarks, but also blogs, images, and videos. Social media support co-creation: processes where customers (or users, if you prefer) do not just consume but play an active role in defining and shaping the end product. Famous examples include Six Degrees, LiveJournal, Digg, Epinions, Myspace, Flickr, YouTube, Linked-in, and Pinterest. Of course, today's internet giants Facebook and Twitter are key new developments. Finally, Wikipedia should not be overlooked - a major resource in many language technologies including information retrieval!
The second part of the lecture looks into the opportunities for information retrieval research. Social media platforms tend to provide access to user profiles, connections between users, the content these users publish or share, and how they react to each other's content through commenting and rating. Also, the large majority of social media platforms allow their users to categorize content by means of tags (or, in direct communication, through hash-tags), resulting in collaborative ways of information organization known as folksonomies. However, these social media also form a challenge for information retrieval research: the many platforms vary in functionalities, and we have only very little understanding of clearly desirable features like combining tag usage and ratings in content recommendation! A unifying approach based on random walks will be discussed to illustrate how we can answer some of these questions [1], but clearly the area has ample opportunity to leave your own marks.
In the final part of the lecture I will briefly touch upon an even wider range of opportunities, where data derived from social media form a key component to enable new research and insights. I will review a few important results from research centered on Wikipedia, facebook and twitter data, as well as a diverse range of new information sources including the geo- and temporal information derived from images and tweets, product reviews and comments on youtube videos, and how url shorteners may give a view on what is popular on the web.
[1] Maarten Clements, Arjen P. De Vries, and Marcel J. T. Reinders. 2010. The task-dependent effect of tags and ratings on social media access. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 28, 4, Article 21 (November 2010), 42 pages. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1852102.1852107
Given at ISWC 2009 as a part of "Legal and Social Frameworks for Sharing Data on the Web" tutorial with Leigh Dodds and Tom Heath from Talis and Jordan Hatcher from Open Data Commons. 25 Oct 2009. (http://www.opendatacommons.org/events/iswc-2009-legal-social-sharing-data-web/)
Presentation at EMTACL10, http://www.ntnu.no/ub/emtacl/
Guus van den Brekel
Central medical library, UMCG
Virtual Research Networks: towards Research 2.0
In the next few years, the further development of social, educational and research networks – with its extensive collaborative possibilities – will be dictating how users will search for, manage and exchange information. The network – evolved by technology – is changing the user's behaviour and that will affect the future of information services. Many envision a possible leading role for libraries in collaboration and community building services.
Users are not only heavily using new tools, but are also creating and shaping their own preferred tools.
Today's students are incorporating Web 2.0 skills in daily life, in their social and learning environments.
Tomorrow's research staff will expect to be able to use their preferred tools and resources within their work environment.
Today's ánd tomorrow's libraries should support students and staff in the learning and research process by integrating library services and resources into their environments.
This presentation was provided by Chris Erdmann of Library Carpentries and by Judy Ruttenberg of ARL during the NISO virtual conference, Open Data Projects, held on Wednesday, June 13, 2018.
Social metadata for libraries, archives and museums: Research findings from t...Rose Holley
The presentative gives research findings from the Research Libraries Group (RLG) on Social Metadata Working Group. The group worked from 2009-2010 researching sites that used social media features before making some recommendations to libraries, archives and museums.
Scholars@Cornell: Visualizing the Scholarship DataMuhammad Javed
Short paper published in IEEE Visualizations in Practice workshop. Phoenix, AZ.
A new project of CUL is Scholars@Cornell, a data and visualization service built upon VIVO’s semantic, linked data knowledge-base that represents the record of scholarship produced by Cornell faculty and researchers. While adhering to the VIVO ontology, our work on Scholars@Cornell helps move VIVO forward in the technology areas that require a looser coupling of backend and frontend technologies. One key question we set out to answer was “how can visual mediation help users navigate the rich semantic data that represent the scholarship data recorded in VIVO knowledge-base?” Can visualizations be used to make the content more consumable and answer the questions that cannot easily be answered by browsing list views.
RDAP 15: Research Data Integration in the Purdue LibrariesASIS&T
Research Data Access and Preservation Summit, 2015
Minneapolis, MN
April 22-23, 2015
Lisa Zilinski, Data Specialist, Carnegie Mellon University
Amy Barton, Metadata Specialist, Purdue
Tao Zhang, Digital User Experience Specialist, Purdue
Line Pouchard, Computational Science Information Specialist, Purdue
Pete E. Pascuzzi, Molecular Biosciences Information Specialist, Purdue
Looking beyond plain text for document representation in the enterpriseArjen de Vries
In many real life scenarios, searching for information is not the user's end goal. In this presentation I look into the specific example of corporate strategy and business development in a university setting.
In today's academic institutions, strategic questions are those that relate to dependency on funding instruments, the public private partnerships that exist (and those that should be extended!), and the match between topic areas addressed by the research staff and those claimed important by policy makers. The professional search tasks encountered to answer questions in this domain are usually addressed by business intelligence (BI) tools, and not by search engines. However, professionals are known to be busy people inspired by their own research interests, and not particularly fond of keeping the
customer relationship management (CRM) or knowledge management systems up to date for the organisation's strategic interest. This then results in incomplete and inaccurate data.
Instead of requiring research staff (or their administrative support) to provide this management information, I will illustrate by example how the desired information usually exists already in the documents inherent to the academic work process. Information retrieval could thus play an important role in the computer systems that support the business analytics involved, and could significantly improve the coverage of entities of interest - i.e., to reduce the effort involved in achieving good recall in business analytics. The ranking functionality over the enterprise's (textual) content should however not be an isolated component. Our example setting integrates the information derived from research proposals, research publications and the financial systems, providing an excellent motivation for a more unified approach to structured and unstructured data.
Social media sites (by some referred to as the web 2.0) allow their users to interact with each other, for example in collecting and sharing so-called user-generated content - these can be just bookmarks, but also blogs, images, and videos. Social media support co-creation: processes where customers (or users, if you prefer) do not just consume but play an active role in defining and shaping the end product. Famous examples include Six Degrees, LiveJournal, Digg, Epinions, Myspace, Flickr, YouTube, Linked-in, and Pinterest. Of course, today's internet giants Facebook and Twitter are key new developments. Finally, Wikipedia should not be overlooked - a major resource in many language technologies including information retrieval!
The second part of the lecture looks into the opportunities for information retrieval research. Social media platforms tend to provide access to user profiles, connections between users, the content these users publish or share, and how they react to each other's content through commenting and rating. Also, the large majority of social media platforms allow their users to categorize content by means of tags (or, in direct communication, through hash-tags), resulting in collaborative ways of information organization known as folksonomies. However, these social media also form a challenge for information retrieval research: the many platforms vary in functionalities, and we have only very little understanding of clearly desirable features like combining tag usage and ratings in content recommendation! A unifying approach based on random walks will be discussed to illustrate how we can answer some of these questions [1], but clearly the area has ample opportunity to leave your own marks.
In the final part of the lecture I will briefly touch upon an even wider range of opportunities, where data derived from social media form a key component to enable new research and insights. I will review a few important results from research centered on Wikipedia, facebook and twitter data, as well as a diverse range of new information sources including the geo- and temporal information derived from images and tweets, product reviews and comments on youtube videos, and how url shorteners may give a view on what is popular on the web.
[1] Maarten Clements, Arjen P. De Vries, and Marcel J. T. Reinders. 2010. The task-dependent effect of tags and ratings on social media access. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 28, 4, Article 21 (November 2010), 42 pages. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1852102.1852107
Given at ISWC 2009 as a part of "Legal and Social Frameworks for Sharing Data on the Web" tutorial with Leigh Dodds and Tom Heath from Talis and Jordan Hatcher from Open Data Commons. 25 Oct 2009. (http://www.opendatacommons.org/events/iswc-2009-legal-social-sharing-data-web/)
Presentation at EMTACL10, http://www.ntnu.no/ub/emtacl/
Guus van den Brekel
Central medical library, UMCG
Virtual Research Networks: towards Research 2.0
In the next few years, the further development of social, educational and research networks – with its extensive collaborative possibilities – will be dictating how users will search for, manage and exchange information. The network – evolved by technology – is changing the user's behaviour and that will affect the future of information services. Many envision a possible leading role for libraries in collaboration and community building services.
Users are not only heavily using new tools, but are also creating and shaping their own preferred tools.
Today's students are incorporating Web 2.0 skills in daily life, in their social and learning environments.
Tomorrow's research staff will expect to be able to use their preferred tools and resources within their work environment.
Today's ánd tomorrow's libraries should support students and staff in the learning and research process by integrating library services and resources into their environments.
This presentation was provided by Chris Erdmann of Library Carpentries and by Judy Ruttenberg of ARL during the NISO virtual conference, Open Data Projects, held on Wednesday, June 13, 2018.
Sands Fish - Knowing in the Age of Networked Knowledgesandsfish
Knowledge representation has become extremely complex since the advent of the internet, online education, and commons-based peer production. This talk discusses the thresholds we've crossed and what it means to know something when knowledge is massively interlinked.
Towards collaboration at scale: Libraries, the social and the technicallisld
Libraries are now supporting research and learning behaviors in data rich network environments. This presentation looks at some examples focusing on how an emphasis on individual systems needs to give way to a broader view of process, workflow and behaviors.
It also discusses how this environment creates a demand for collaboration at scale among libraries.
The Liber 2009 presentation repeated for a Dutch audience IN Dutch but with the english slides (just the first one is in Dutch :-)
Samenwerking Hogeschool bibliotheken SHB, 5 november 2009
Mending the Gap between Library's Electronic and Print Collections in ILS and...New York University
This presentation proposed a conceptual model to model user's info seeking behavior in the context of their experience and use the model to improve library's collections and services using St. John's University Libraries for case study. It reviewed Web content technologies offered by IT vendors, and compared what offered in content technologies by Library IT vendors. To fill in the gap, It developed the preliminary proposal for 1) required data architecture in SOA framework, 2) desired features for managing library print and electronic content on library's website, 3) adoption of Semantic Web standards and technologies for managing library resources, and 4) the case study scenario with sample conceptual model.
Library discovery: past, present and some futureslisld
A presentation at the NISO virtual conference on Webscale Discovery Services, 20 November 2013.
Considers some of the issues that have led to the adoption of these services, and some future directions.
Distinguishes between discovery (providing a library destination) and discoverability (making stuff discoverable elsewhere).
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
"Impact of front-end architecture on development cost", Viktor TurskyiFwdays
I have heard many times that architecture is not important for the front-end. Also, many times I have seen how developers implement features on the front-end just following the standard rules for a framework and think that this is enough to successfully launch the project, and then the project fails. How to prevent this and what approach to choose? I have launched dozens of complex projects and during the talk we will analyze which approaches have worked for me and which have not.
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...BookNet Canada
The publishing industry has been selling digital audiobooks and ebooks for over a decade and has found its groove. What’s changed? What has stayed the same? Where do we go from here? Join a group of leading sales peers from across the industry for a conversation about the lessons learned since the popularization of digital books, best practices, digital book supply chain management, and more.
Link to video recording: https://bnctechforum.ca/sessions/selling-digital-books-in-2024-insights-from-industry-leaders/
Presented by BookNet Canada on May 28, 2024, with support from the Department of Canadian Heritage.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
Search and Society: Reimagining Information Access for Radical FuturesBhaskar Mitra
The field of Information retrieval (IR) is currently undergoing a transformative shift, at least partly due to the emerging applications of generative AI to information access. In this talk, we will deliberate on the sociotechnical implications of generative AI for information access. We will argue that there is both a critical necessity and an exciting opportunity for the IR community to re-center our research agendas on societal needs while dismantling the artificial separation between the work on fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in IR and the rest of IR research. Instead of adopting a reactionary strategy of trying to mitigate potential social harms from emerging technologies, the community should aim to proactively set the research agenda for the kinds of systems we should build inspired by diverse explicitly stated sociotechnical imaginaries. The sociotechnical imaginaries that underpin the design and development of information access technologies needs to be explicitly articulated, and we need to develop theories of change in context of these diverse perspectives. Our guiding future imaginaries must be informed by other academic fields, such as democratic theory and critical theory, and should be co-developed with social science scholars, legal scholars, civil rights and social justice activists, and artists, among others.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
the slogan & logo a) it’s the web, stupid! is pretty long in the tooth these days b) never the less, tension between dogma & web-driven functionality for linked data does exist c) this offers a gentle reminder of this particular workshop’s focus
checklist of the participating institutions and organizations 25 people all together a) library-centric by design b) other initiatives & events are addressing wider range of resources & agencies (this JISC session, Europeana, LOD_LAM in SF, early June) c) yeast added to the mix: research, corporate, and non-profit content technology agencies
here’s where you get to do a bit of work ... I won’t read these a) objectives for the workshop fund-able plans for creating tools, processes, and vehicles to expedite a disruptive paradigm shift catch phrase for the effort as a whole: less talking, more doing ... doing at web scale (pace!)
(pace!)
(pace!)
CLIR funded creation of a linked-data survey ... state affairs to set a framework and provide a means for participants to begin work with relatively similar definitions for “linked data”
screen shot of the survey’s outline (note headings ... pace!)
drilling down ... extant metadata (note headings ... pace -- )
looking at a specific subheading
which takes one to the content checklists of content with URLs 1 st version published to the Workshop participants final version (with updates from the workhop & ensuing developments in the linked data arena will be public on the CLIR site by end of summer ... ever changing landscape: schema.org W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group David / Richard will hear when the web site is publicly accessable
some additional work for you ... first is Josh Greenberg’s telling synopsis
and Mike Bergman’s thoughts on provenance & co-referencing ... worth consideration relative to cultural heritage efforts & objectives
Stefano mazzoki’s tale on linking take note of the date and give some thought to this snippet ... in terms of what’s playing out in the dialogs among proponents & advocates for varied flavors of structured data ... linked-data in the W3C cannon, RDF, RDFa, rich snippets, schema.org, Facebook’s Open Graph Protocol, Freebase’s GraphD driven topics
... speaks for itself
this checklist surfaced near the Wokshop’s mid-point a) procedurally the workshop was shaped by an evolving agenda b) said agenda driven by the products of four 6-person workgroups c) cross pollination among workgroups provided by alternating plenary ... workgroup ... plenary ... workgroup sessions it’s a “prioritized” list of the issues coming separately from the workgoups ... it’s ordered via a simple voting process, each participant having 7 votes ... any number of votes could go to any issue (1 – 7) -- its a rough hewn working document, a quick snapshot that then went back into the work-group process 1. co-reference, reconciliation ... of URs 3. killer apps ... tension between cult heritage built ... emergent via web scale entrepreneurs 11. feed back, metrics ... what’s the value-add
12 user seduction ! 13. workflow ... gross simplifications
sketch of the chief components of a linked-data creation pipeline MARC / MODS library data was the specific use case considerable detail developed in the working documents note: 1) co-references captured early pay big dividends later (less URI bloat) 2) comparison of machine vs. human ID of co-references 80 / 20 – ideal !! mebbe as low 60 / 40 in many cases need efficient human resource ontribution crowdsourcing Freebase reconciliation pipelines note also: 1) revisions that go back thru the whole pipeline can be expensive think about transforming MARC to linked data then pushing revisions back into MARC highly dis-functional impedance (granularity) miss-match
how soon can the publish canon of linked data become the metadata resource of record ?? !! in Workshop’s parlance, what can be done to make the change ... and can that change be incremental
a 10,000 foot snapshot of a work plan for a specific project a) large pools of journal citations b) highly constrained workflows in extant systems with narrow flexibility in staff resources (ranging from little to none) c) using a rough project planning outline, where do the ISSUES fit into the planning and workflow of such a project sketches of Use cases Data modeling expectations for production workflows
maintenance and distribtuion
bottom line IS and REMAINS metrics ... feedback, reporting, reward systems VALUE ADD ... for consumers
VALUE ACCRUED linked data publishers where’s the convincing elevator speech for VLUE ADD / ACCRUED via linked data by the cultural heritage community ?? !!
another take on putting linked data to work across many levels expertise found in GLAM environments a checklist of tasks / events / considerations / planning nodes
placed in a matrix with 3 levels of organization maturity novice journeyman master (oops ... we left out apprentice ...
at the nexis of each matrix junction institutions could find reference implementations that addressed the issues and functions needed by organizations to move forward with their linked data projects
OK ... the unspoken issues much discussed at the Workshop !! URIs change in basic culture ... flat, string-based records throughout the cultural heritage community -- conversion of data hard -- conversion of culture ... DOABLE ?! co-references and provenance inseparable ... trust comes from source of assertions how choices about sameAs were made ... AND NOT MADE crucial value ADD and value ACCRUED
an array of VALUE assessments from Europeana’s mid-June workshop increased relevance ... an apparent winner ... metrics for same? new customers & public mission data enhancement
things to keep in mind ... recurrent themes during the week at Stanford co-references / reconciliation is more web emergent and less policy driven -- in the terms of one of the groups at the workshop schema last ... data first
Wendy Hall talked with the Stanford Libraries’ staff last Summer (2010) ... she recounted her experience with the emerging web, from the perspective of one who developed a well structued, standards-based means of providing access to a massive archive of historial papers at Southampton in the end, the web worked better than what she’d created her message to the Stanford folk: scruffy works
speaks for itself
what’s coming from the Workshop Public version of the CLIR survey Documents from with workshop A few number of proposals (over a relatively short period of time)