SlideShare a Scribd company logo
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
Process Plants Process Design
Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing
Department Guidelines
Rev. 0
REVISION and APPROVALS
Rev. Date Description By Approved
0 01JUL04 Initial Issue JAP EP
This document is the sole and exclusive property of Mustang, including all patented and patentable features and/or
confidential information contained herein. Its use is conditioned upon the user's agreement not to: (i) reproduce the
document, in whole or in part, nor the material described thereon; (ii) use the document for any purpose other than as
specifically permitted in writing by Mustang; or (iii) disclose or otherwise disseminate or allow any such disclosure or
dissemination of this document or its contents to others except as specifically permitted in writing by Mustang. "Mustang" as
used herein refers to Mustang Engineering Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates.
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 1 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 SCOPE..........................................................................................................................................3
2.0 HYDRAULICS CALCULATION....................................................................................................3
2.1 Pressure Drop Criteria.......................................................................................................3
2.2 Equivalent Length of Valves and Fitting ............................................................................3
2.3 Flow Regimes of Vapor-Liquid Mixed Phase Flow............................................................3
3.0 LINE SIZING CRITERIA ...............................................................................................................3
4.0 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF EQUIVALENT LENGTH ............................................................4
4.1 Pump Discharge and Compressor Circuit .........................................................................4
4.2 Reboiler Inlet or Return Lines............................................................................................5
4.3 Pump Suction Line from Drums or Tower Bottoms ...........................................................5
5.0 SPECIAL HYDRAULICS CALCULATIONS.................................................................................5
5.1 Thermosyphon Reboiler Circuits .......................................................................................5
5.2 Kettle Reboiler Circuits......................................................................................................6
5.3 Pump NPSH and Pump Hydraulics Calculations ..............................................................6
5.4 Vacuum Tower Transfer Line Sizing .................................................................................6
APPENDICES...........................................................................................................................................8
Appendix A: References ..............................................................................................................8
Appendix B: Tables......................................................................................................................9
Table 1 - Liquid Flow Line Sizing Criteria....................................................................................10
Table 2 - Vapor and Gas Flow Line Sizing Criteria .....................................................................11
Table 3 - Two Phase Flow Line Sizing Criteria ...........................................................................12
Appendix C: Figures...................................................................................................................14
Figure 1 - Baker Chart, Flow Regimes of Two Phase Flow in Horizontal Pipes .........................15
Figure 2 - Aziz Chart, Flow Regimes of Two Phase Up-Flow in Vertical Pipes ..........................16
Figure 3 - Thermosyphon Reboiler Circuit Hydraulic Calculations..............................................17
Figure 4 - Kettle Type Reboiler Circuit Hydraulic Calculations....................................................19
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 2 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
1.0 SCOPE
This section outlines the general guidelines for hydraulic calculation of piping systems. It is
intended to provide a consistent approach to hydraulic calculations as performed by Process
Engineers / Technical Professionals, but not to cover every special case one may encounter.
Guidelines for calculating pressure drop through equipment such as trays, packings and
reactors are included in other guidelines.
2.0 HYDRAULICS CALCULATION
Mustang has several line sizing programs available in myMustang®. Refer to the Sizing page
within the Process portal. Regardless of the program or method selected, there are
independent variables to consider.
2.1 Pressure Drop Criteria
Absolute Roughness Factor: use 0.00015 ft for commercial steel pipe. For non-steel
pipe, use factors given in the Fluid Flow section of the GPSA Engineering Data Book [2].
Pipe Age Factor: use 1.2 unless noted otherwise in the design basis for a specific
project.
For vapor-liquid mixed phase, the Hughmark "in-place” density may be used, where
available as an option, for calculating static head.
2.2 Equivalent Length of Valves and Fitting
Use the table shown as Figure 17-4 in the GPSA Engineering Data Book [2].
Spreadsheet templates which use average L/D ratios and yield essentially the same
equivalent lengths may also be used. Optionally, Crane No. 410 [1] provides equations
for calculating valve and fitting losses as velocity head equivalents.
2.3 Flow Regimes of Vapor-Liquid Mixed Phase Flow
• Horizontal flow: Use Baker chart shown in Figure 1.
• Vertical flow: Use the Aziz Chart, Figure 2, via Reference 2. This figure is
considered to be conservative and valid for pressure up to 150 psig, which covers
the range of concern.
3.0 LINE SIZING CRITERIA
Tables 1, 2, and 3 in Appendix B give some typical "rules of thumb" for line sizing. Although
these rules are applicable to most situations, they may not be suitable in all cases. For critical
circuits, hydraulics should be checked in detail to confirm the available pressure drop regardless
of whether the lines meet rules-of-thumb criteria. In addition, the optimum line size is
determined by balancing the capital cost of the piping system against the operating cost of
pumps and/or compressors. To minimize initial investment, special attention should be given to
expensive lines, for example:
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 3 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
• Alloy pipe
• Carbon steel pipe larger than 12”
• Piping system involving many valves and fitting such as dryers
• Lines longer than 500 ft
In corrosive and erosive environments, however, the line shall be sized based on maximum
velocity considerations to provide satisfactory service life. When a new or unfamiliar service is
encountered, the Process Design Manager shall be consulted for line sizing criteria as well as
its material selection.
4.0 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF EQUIVALENT LENGTH
The following data can be used for preliminary estimates of equivalent length when detail piping
information, such as isometrics, is not available.
4.1 Pump Discharge and Compressor Circuit
Piping Size, inches
On-site
L eq./L straight
Off-site
L eq./L straight
1-1/2 1.30 1.09
2 1.41 1.14
3 1.57 1.18
4 1.74 1.23
6 2.12 1.36
8 2.43 1.42
10 2.82 1.55
12 3.15 1.65
14 3.41 1.74
16 3.75 1.83
18 4.14 1.92
20 4.51 2.06
24 5.19 2.24
These typically conservative equivalent length ratios (to be used for budget estimates)
only are estimated based on the following assumptions:
• For on-site systems: each 100 feet of piping having one fully open gate valve, one
swing check valve, one hard tee and four long radius elbows.
• For offsite systems: each 100 feet of piping with one fully open gate valve and four
long radius elbows.
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 4 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
4.2 Reboiler Inlet or Return Lines
Pipe Size, inches Typical Equivalent Length, ft
4 100
6 120
8 140
10 160
12 180
14 200
16 220
18 250
20 280
24 330
30 420
If the reboiler is spring supported, the equivalent length can be substantially reduced.
4.3 Pump Suction Line from Drums or Tower Bottoms
Pipe Size, inches Typical Equivalent Length, ft
through 6" 300
8" – 12” 400
14" and larger 250 pipe diameters + 150
Notes:
• If a permanent strainer is installed in the pump suction line, add 200 ft of equivalent
length to calculate the pressure drop through the strainer. If a temporary strainer is
used, the Process Engineer / Technical Professional should clarify with client if it will
stay in place during normal operation.
• The equivalent length for pump suction taken from a tower side draw-off can be
substantially higher than those shown above.
5.0 SPECIAL HYDRAULICS CALCULATIONS
5.1 Thermosyphon Reboiler Circuits
The worksheet shown on Figure 3 should be used to analyze the reboiler circuit
hydraulics for thermosyphon reboilers. Design considerations for the thermosyphon
reboiler system are as follows:
• Do not use the usual age factor of 1.2 for line friction loss. Instead, use a safety
factor of 2 for line friction loss and allowable total reboiler pressure drop when using
homogenous mixed phase density and a safety factor of 1.5 when using Hughmark
in-place density, whichever is more conservative. The criteria may be relaxed for
revamp projects or those systems having high densities in the reboiler return line
such as a deethanizer tower reboiler.
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 5 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
• Use the percent vaporization specified in the reboiler data sheet. Recirculating
thermosyphon reboilers are generally designed for 30 wt% vaporization.
Once-through thermosyphon reboilers can have up to 50 wt% vaporization.
• Process Engineer / Technical Professional should check the actual operating
pressure of the reboiler if the mean temperature difference between the heating
medium and circulation fluid is sensitive to pressure variation. The pressure of the
boiling medium in the thermosyphon reboiler is equal to the tower operating pressure
plus riser losses including static head based on in-place density.
• The reboiler return line should be sized to avoid slugging problems. However, this
may not always be possible without an excessive elevation of skirt height, especially
for light ends towers operated at high pressure. It is generally recognized that towers
operated above a certain operating pressure (subject to engineering judgment), slug
flow may not exist or is not detrimental to a reboiler/tower operation.
5.2 Kettle Reboiler Circuits
The worksheet shown on Figure 4 should be used for hydraulic calculations associated
with kettle reboiler circuits. Design considerations for the kettle reboiler system are as
follows:
• Use a safety factor of 1.5 for line friction loss and allowable total reboiler pressure
drop.
• If the product from the kettle reboiler flows to a pump suction, the elevation of kettle
should also satisfy pump NPSH requirement.
• If the product from the kettle reboiler flows to a heat exchanger first, free drain from
the kettle to exchanger is preferred. This is not a mandatory requirement if the
product is of multi-component mixtures with wide boiling ranges. However, the pipe
length and elevation rise shall be minimized.
5.3 Pump NPSH and Pump Hydraulics Calculations
Refer to “Pumps" [3] for calculation guidelines and procedures.
5.4 Vacuum Tower Transfer Line Sizing
Transfer lines in crude vacuum units are typically very large and are constructed of
expensive alloy material. It is imperative that the process designer perform a detailed
hydraulic calculation to select the smallest line size.
The maximum velocity should be limited to 90% of sonic velocity. It usually occurs at the
inlet nozzle to the vacuum tower. Sonic velocity is expressed as:
VS = 68.1(kP/ρ)1/2
VS sonic velocity, ft/s
k the specific heat ratio, Cp/Cv
P the absolute pressure, psia
ρ the homogeneous mixed phase density, lb/ft3
The total pressure drop from the heater outlet to the tower inlet is limited by the heater
outlet temperature, which is typically 25°F higher than the flash zone temperature and
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 6 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
should generally be limited to 780°F maximum due to the concern of excessive cracking
and coking.
The design of the transfer line may proceed as follows:
• Starting at the flash zone condition, run a series of adiabatic flashes on the vacuum
tower charge, with a pressure increment of approximately 25% of the downstream
absolute pressure.
• Select the transfer line size based on the sonic velocity limitation stated above.
• Divide the line into several segments. Calculate or estimate the equivalent length of
each segment.
Start from the tower inlet nozzle, calculate the pressure drop in each line segment
using the following equation:
100
)
100
/
(
144
2
V
∆P
2
1
2
2 L
P
g
V
frict
avg
×
∆
+
×
−
=
ρ
Acceleration Loss Friction Pressure Drop
∆P total pressure drop, psi
V1 upstream velocity, ft/s
V2 downstream velocity, ft/s
(∆P/100)frict friction pressure drop, psi/100 ft
L total equivalent length, ft
g 32.2 ft/s2
Pavg average mixed phase density, lb/ft3
The acceleration loss in vacuum service can be a significant part of the total
pressure drop and should not be neglected. Since the amount of flashing depends
on the pressure, the above calculations are iterative.
• The pressure drop between the heater outlet and flash zone (typically 3 psi) is the
sum of the pressure drops for all line segments. The heater outlet temperature can
then be obtained from the pressure-temperature relationship which is generated from
the adiabatic flashes in step (a).
• If the calculated heater outlet temperature exceeds the allowable maximum, a larger
transfer line is selected and steps a. through d. are repeated until the temperature
limitation is satisfied. It should be noted that this rarely occurs unless the transfer
line is unusually long or the flash zone temperature already approaches the
maximum allowable temperature.
• If the calculated heater outlet temperature is more than 10°F lower than the
allowable maximum, a reduction in the line size between the tower and furnace may
be justified. The Process Engineer / Technical Professional should check the sonic
velocity criteria at the point of line size reduction.
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 7 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
APPENDICES
Appendix A: References
[1] “Flow of Fluids through Valves, Fittings, and Pipe,” Crane Technical Paper No. 410,
1988.
[2] “Fluid Flow and Piping,” GPSA Engineering Data Book, 10th ed., 1987, Section 17,
Volume II.
[3] “Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Pumps”, Mustang Department Guidelines,
DG-PPG-0107.
[4] KYPIPE User's Manual.
[5] "Centrifugal Compressor Inlet Piping - A Practical Guide," Elliott Compressor, Reprint No.
117.
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 8 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
Appendix B: Tables
Table No. Title
1 Liquid Flow Line Sizing Criteria
2 Vapor and Gas Flow Line Sizing Criteria
3 Two Phase Flow Line Sizing Criteria
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 9 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
Table 1 - Liquid Flow Line Sizing Criteria
Typical
Pressure Maximum
Drop Velocity
Service psi/100 ft ft/s Remarks
1. Pump suction (General Service)
a) Liquid at boiling point or 0.5 max. 3 (4" & smaller) 3.0 ft/s max. for vacuum tower bottoms
less than 50°F below it 5 (6”-10") pump regardless of sizes.
6 (12" & larger)
b) Sub-cooled liquids 2.0 max. 8 Higher than 8 ft/s is acceptable if there is
(50°F below boiling point) substantial length of straight pipe
(5 times of pipe dia.) just ahead of the pump
suction.
2. Side stream draw-off 0.2 max. (Note 1)
3. Liquid to non-pumped reboiler 0.2 (Note 1) The allowable pressure drop (psi/100ft)
can be higher if larger elevation difference
is available.
4. Gravity flow (in waste water 0.5 max. 2.5 ft/s min. The available liquid head
treating unit, etc.) should be at least two times the friction
loss calculated based on piping layout.
5. Pump discharge (Gen. Service) 4.0 max. 15 (Note 2)
6. Cooling water
Short lead 2.0 max. 15 The velocity should be above
Long header 1.0 max. 15 3 ft/s to prevent excessive fouling.
7. Corrosive liquids
Sulfuric acid service 3.0 (C.S.) (Note 3)
in Alky Unit 6.0 (316 S.S.)
“ 8.0 (Alloy 20)
Rich amine (liquid phase) 5.0 (C.S.) (Note 4)
Lean amine 7.0 (C.S.)
Caustic (lower than 140°F) 5.0 (C.S.)
8. Erosive liquids
FCC slurry 7 3 ft/s min. to prevent settling of catalyst
fines.
9. High available delta P 5.0 max 20 Should consider erosion and possible
vaporization.
10. Sea water in concrete 10.0
lined pipe
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 10 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
Table 2 - Vapor and Gas Flow Line Sizing Criteria
Typical
Pressure Maximum
Drop Velocity
Service psi/100 ft ft/s Remarks
1. Column overhead and condenser rundown
For tower operated under high vacuum
10 mmHg abs. 0.01 100/(ρ)
1/2
condition, calculation based on piping
50 mmHg abs. 0.05 or 300 ft/s layout is required. Typically, the pressure
380 mmHg abs. 0.1 whichever is drop between tower and ejector in crude
Atmospheric - 50 psig 0.2 lower. vacuum column overhead is 1-2 mmHg.
50 psig - 150 psig 0.4 Higher ∆P/100 ft may be used for towers
150 psig + 0.6 operated at high pressure and line
pressure drop only constitutes ≤ 0.5% of
operating pressure.
2. Oil vapors
10 mmHg abs. 0.01 100/(ρg)
1/2
or
50 mmHg abs. 0.06 300 ft/s
380 mmHg abs. 0.2 whichever is
Atmospheric - 50 psig 0.5 lower.
50 psig - 150 psig 1.5
150 psig + 2.5
3. Steam
0 - 50 psig headers 0.5 100/( ρg)
1/2
or
laterals 1.5 300 ft/s
150 psig headers 1.0 whichever is
laterals 2.5 lower.
300 psig+ headers 2.5
laterals 4.0
4. Condensing Steam Turbine 450 Calculation based on exhaust piping
layout is required. Typically, the
pressure drop between turbine and
first condenser is 0.2 psi for air
cooled condenser and 0.1 psi for
water cooled condenser. In many
cases, the line size is governed by
velocity limitation.
5. Kettle Reboiler Return 0.1 - 0.2
6. Compressor Suction
Reciprocating (Note 5) For multistage compressors, the usual
allowable interstage pressure drop
Centrifugal (Note 6) exclusive of pulsation dampers
Is the larger of 5 to 7 psi or 1% of
system absolute pressure for a single
exchanger, separator and associated
piping. Increase the pressure drop if
there is additional equipment.
7. FCC Reactor Vapor 0.2 max. 100 Higher velocity results in excessive
to Fractionator erosion from catalyst fines.
8. Column Hot Vapor Bypass 0.5 Typically, the flowrate of hot vapor
bypass ranges from 10 to 15% of gross
column overhead vapor flowrate.
Process Engineer to confirm the
flowrate based on heat transfer calculation.
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 11 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
Table 3 - Two Phase Flow Line Sizing Criteria
Typical
Pressure Maximum
Drop Velocity
Service psi/100 ft ft/s Remarks
1. Thermosiphon Reboiler Return 0.1-0.2 Can be higher if large elevation
difference is available. See Section
5.1 for other considerations.
2. Other Two-Phase Lines
10 mmHg abs. 0.01 Max. velocity Except crude vacuum tower
50 mmHg abs. 0.06 is 100/(ρmix)
1/2
transfer line where the
380 mmHg abs. 0.02 or 300 ft/s maximum velocity is
Atmospheric - 50 psig 0.5 whichever is discussed in Section 5.4.
50 - 150 psig 1.5 lower. ρmix is
150 psig + 2.5 the homogeneous
mixed density
in lb/ft
3
.
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 12 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
Notes for Tables 1, 2, and 3:
1) Saturated liquid draw-off from vessel should be adequately sized to avoid vaporization and vortexing
at the draw-off nozzle. The maximum allowable velocity is calculated as
Vmax = 3.858 (hmin)½
or hmin = (Vmax / 3.858)2
Vmax : maximum allowable velocity through the draw-off nozzle, ft/s
hmin : the liquid static head above the centerline of draw-off nozzle, ft
Equation for Vmax is valid only when the liquid head is at least one-half of the nozzle diameter above
the top edge of draw-off nozzle. The depth of draw-off sump should be a minimum of 1½ times the
nozzle diameter. See Mustang Process Design Guidelines, Section B, Towers.
The line should turn down immediately and should be a minimum of 6 ft vertical drop before being
swaged down to calculated line sizes.
2) Process engineer should confirm the total pressure drop based on actual piping or plot layouts
especially if high ∆P/100 ft is used to size long lines.
3) Typically, the acid strength ranges from 93% to 99% in the Alky unit. Selection of piping materials
depends on factors including size, velocity, flow turbulence and temperature. Consult with a Sr. level
Process Engineer about the material selection and allowable velocity criteria. For further details, see
Mustang Process Design Guidelines, Section M, Materials of Construction.
4) Stainless steel pipe is commonly used in areas where acid gas is flashed out of rich amine solution.
However, for long runs, heavy wall carbon steel pipe may be used in lieu of stainless steel.
5) The line size and piping layout may be dictated by the compressor acoustic analog study.
6) If inlet and discharge nozzles are oriented normal to compressor shaft and there are three diameters
of straight pipe just ahead of compressor inlet, the maximum velocity in the inlet is
Vmax = (995 T/M)1/2
Vmax : maximum allowable velocity in the suction of centrifugal compressor, ft/s
T : inlet temperature, OR
M : gas molecular weight
Vmax will be lower if the inlet line has less than three pipe diameters of straight run pipe. A review of
inlet piping systems as related to compressor performance is presented in Reference 5.
7) In general, the vapor-liquid mixed phase line should be sized to avoid the slug flow. Wherever this
becomes impractical and results in excessive pressure drop, a Sr. level Process Engineer should be
consulted.
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 13 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
Appendix C: Figures
Figure No. Title
1 Baker Chart, Flow Regimes of Two Phase Flow in Horizontal Pipes (1 page)
2 Aziz Chart, Flow Regimes of Two Phase Up-Flow in Vertical Pipes (1 page)
3 Thermosyphon Reboiler Circuit Hydraulic Calculations (2 pages)
4 Kettle Type Reboiler Circuit Hydraulic Calculations (2 pages)
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 14 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
Figure 1 - Baker Chart, Flow Regimes of Two Phase Flow in Horizontal Pipes
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 15 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
Figure 2 - Aziz Chart, Flow Regimes of Two Phase Up-Flow in Vertical Pipes
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 16 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
Figure 3 - Thermosyphon Reboiler Circuit Hydraulic Calculations
OPERATING COMMONS - INLET OPERATING CONDITIONS - OUTLET
Temperature. o
F _________ Temperature. o
F ___________
Pressure, psig _________ Pressure, psig ___________
Liquid density. ρ1, @T. lb/ft3
_________ Avg. L/V mixed density, ρ2 @T&P, lb/ft3
___________
Flow, Liq- lb/h _________ Inplace density, ρ3 @T&P. lb/ft3
___________
Flow. Liq., lb/h ___________
Flow. Vap., lb/h ___________
LINE FRICTION LOSS - INLET LINE
FRICTION LOSS - OUTLET
Line size, in _________ Line size. In ___________
∆P per 100 ft. psi _________ ∆P per 100 ft, psi ___________
Equiv. length. ft _________ Equiv. length. Ft ___________
Friction loss (fil), psi _________ Friction loss (fol). Psi ___________
Tower nozzle loss (fin). psi _________ Tower nozzle loss (fon). Psi ___________
Total inlet press. drop fi=fil+fin. Psi _______ Total outlet press. drop fo=fol+fon. Psi ___________
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 17 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
CALCULATE RESISTANCE TO FLOW
A. RESISTANCE CALCULATION BASED ON AVG. MIXED DENSITY (NOTE 2)
1. ∆P (reboiler) allowed * safety factor (______), psi ________
2. Total line friction loss (fi+fo) * safety factor (______), psi ________
3. Static head in return line, Ft = h2 ________
4. Static head in return line, psi = h2 * ρ2 / 144 ________
5. Total resistance to flow (Pr1), psi = #1 + #2 + #4 ________
B. RESISTANCE CALCULATION BASED ON IN-PLACE DENSITY (NOTE 2)
6. ∆P (reboiler) allowed * safety factor (______), psi ________
7. Total line friction loss (fi+fo) * safety factor (______), psi ________
8. Static head in return line, Ft = h2 ________
9. Static head in return line, psi = h2 * ρ3 / 144 ________
10. Total resistance to flow (Pr2), psi = #6 + #7 + #9 ________
CALCULATE DRIVING FORCE
1. Required driving head (h3) based on avg. density, ft = (2.31 * Pr1) / ( ρ1 / 62.37) ________
2. Required driving head (h4) based on in-place density, ft = (2.31 * Pr2) / (ρ1 / 62.37) ________
3. Actual driving head available (h1), ft ________
4. If h1 is > h3 and h4. it is O.K. ________
Notes:
1. It should be confirmed with the equipment engineer that the ∆P allowed for reboiler shall be from
inlet nozzle flange to outlet nozzle flange, including static head.
2. For a new unit, use a safety factor of 2.0 based on average mixed density, and 1.5 based on in-
place density.
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 18 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
Figure 4 - Kettle Type Reboiler Circuit Hydraulic Calculations
OPERATING CONDITIONS - INLET OPERATING CONDITIONS - OUTLET
Temperature, o
F ________ Temperature, o
F ________
Pressure, psig ________ Pressure, psig ________
Liquid density, ρ1, @T. lb/ft3
________ Vapor density. ρ2, @T. lb/ft3
________
Flow, Liquid lb/h ________ Flow, Vapor lb/h ________
LINE FRICTION LOSS INLET LINE FRICTION
LOSS - OUTLET
Line size, In. ________ Line size, In. ________
∆P per 100 ft, psi ________ ∆P per 100 ft, psi ________
Equiv. Length, ft ________ Equiv. Length, ft ________
Friction loss (fil), psi ________ Friction loss (fol), psi ________
Tower nozzle loss (fin), psi ________ Tower nozzle loss (fon), psi ________
Total inlet press. drop fi = fil+fin, psi ________ Total inlet press. drop fo = fol+fon, psi ________
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 19 of 20
DG-PPG-0110
Document No.
MUSTANG
Process Plants Process Design Guidelines:
Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0
Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision.
DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 20 of 20
CALCULATE RESISTANCE TO FLOW (NOTE 2)
1. ∆P (reboiler) allowed * safety factor (______), psi ________
2. Total line friction loss (fi+fo) * safety factor (______), psi ________
3. Static head in return line, Ft = h2 ________
4. Static head in return line, psi = h2 * ρ2 / 144 ________
5. Total resistance to flow (Pr1), psi = #1 + #2 + #4 ________
CALCULATE DRIVING FORCE
1. Required driving head (h), ft = (2.31 * Pr) / ( ρ1 / 62.37) ________
2. Actual driving head available (h1), ft ________
3. If h1 is > h, it is O.K. ________
Notes:
1. It should be confirmed with equipment engineer that ∆P allowed for reboiler shall be from inlet
nozzle flange to outlet nozzle flange.
2. For new unit, use safety factor of 1.5

More Related Content

Similar to line sizing-mustang.pdf

Improving Energy Efficiency of Pumps and Fans
Improving Energy Efficiency of Pumps and FansImproving Energy Efficiency of Pumps and Fans
Improving Energy Efficiency of Pumps and Fans
eecfncci
 
010 115-001-03 ESPECIFICACIONES DE TUBERÍA
010 115-001-03 ESPECIFICACIONES DE TUBERÍA010 115-001-03 ESPECIFICACIONES DE TUBERÍA
010 115-001-03 ESPECIFICACIONES DE TUBERÍA
Juan Novillo Ramos
 
Structural Design and FEM Analysis of Bleeder in Steam Turbine Casing
Structural Design and FEM Analysis of Bleeder in Steam Turbine CasingStructural Design and FEM Analysis of Bleeder in Steam Turbine Casing
Structural Design and FEM Analysis of Bleeder in Steam Turbine Casing
IRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Design and Analysis of Catalytic Converter of Automobile Engine
IRJET- Design and Analysis of Catalytic Converter of Automobile EngineIRJET- Design and Analysis of Catalytic Converter of Automobile Engine
IRJET- Design and Analysis of Catalytic Converter of Automobile Engine
IRJET Journal
 
Filtro Respiración CPF 20 y 80
Filtro Respiración CPF 20 y 80Filtro Respiración CPF 20 y 80
Filtro Respiración CPF 20 y 80
Almacenes JJ S.A.
 
Hydraulic catalogue
Hydraulic catalogueHydraulic catalogue
Hydraulic catalogue
Ramesh Chalise
 
IRJET- CFD Flow Analysis of Station Pipeline
IRJET- CFD Flow Analysis of Station PipelineIRJET- CFD Flow Analysis of Station Pipeline
IRJET- CFD Flow Analysis of Station Pipeline
IRJET Journal
 
IRJET- CFD Simulation and Analysis of Fluid Flow through Concentric Reducer P...
IRJET- CFD Simulation and Analysis of Fluid Flow through Concentric Reducer P...IRJET- CFD Simulation and Analysis of Fluid Flow through Concentric Reducer P...
IRJET- CFD Simulation and Analysis of Fluid Flow through Concentric Reducer P...
IRJET Journal
 
Pump manual
Pump manualPump manual
Pump manual
apuwdm2
 
Project training report
Project training report Project training report
Project training report
Nishant Kumar
 
corruge pipe report.pdf
corruge pipe report.pdfcorruge pipe report.pdf
corruge pipe report.pdf
gokul rungta
 
Industrial Boiler Optimization Toolkit
Industrial Boiler Optimization ToolkitIndustrial Boiler Optimization Toolkit
Industrial Boiler Optimization Toolkit
Power Specialties, Inc.
 
Sathiyaprabhu Piping Stress Engineer CV 2015
Sathiyaprabhu Piping Stress Engineer CV 2015Sathiyaprabhu Piping Stress Engineer CV 2015
Sathiyaprabhu Piping Stress Engineer CV 2015
sathiya prabhu
 
IRJET- Fatigue Life Estimation of Turbine Bypass Valve
IRJET- Fatigue Life Estimation of Turbine Bypass ValveIRJET- Fatigue Life Estimation of Turbine Bypass Valve
IRJET- Fatigue Life Estimation of Turbine Bypass Valve
IRJET Journal
 
045
045045
Case studies in cfd analysis by kk parthiban
Case studies in cfd analysis by kk parthibanCase studies in cfd analysis by kk parthiban
Case studies in cfd analysis by kk parthiban
parthi2006
 
Fire Safety (Common Design Issues) .pptx
Fire Safety (Common Design Issues) .pptxFire Safety (Common Design Issues) .pptx
Fire Safety (Common Design Issues) .pptx
Rafat30
 
Design of Common Header Line for Reduction of Process Time in Pump Testing
Design of Common Header Line for Reduction of Process Time in Pump TestingDesign of Common Header Line for Reduction of Process Time in Pump Testing
Design of Common Header Line for Reduction of Process Time in Pump Testing
IRJET Journal
 
Work carried out on 21G62 between Nov 2015 - Feb 2016
Work carried out on 21G62 between Nov 2015 - Feb 2016Work carried out on 21G62 between Nov 2015 - Feb 2016
Work carried out on 21G62 between Nov 2015 - Feb 2016
Joe Edwards
 
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
IJERD Editor
 

Similar to line sizing-mustang.pdf (20)

Improving Energy Efficiency of Pumps and Fans
Improving Energy Efficiency of Pumps and FansImproving Energy Efficiency of Pumps and Fans
Improving Energy Efficiency of Pumps and Fans
 
010 115-001-03 ESPECIFICACIONES DE TUBERÍA
010 115-001-03 ESPECIFICACIONES DE TUBERÍA010 115-001-03 ESPECIFICACIONES DE TUBERÍA
010 115-001-03 ESPECIFICACIONES DE TUBERÍA
 
Structural Design and FEM Analysis of Bleeder in Steam Turbine Casing
Structural Design and FEM Analysis of Bleeder in Steam Turbine CasingStructural Design and FEM Analysis of Bleeder in Steam Turbine Casing
Structural Design and FEM Analysis of Bleeder in Steam Turbine Casing
 
IRJET- Design and Analysis of Catalytic Converter of Automobile Engine
IRJET- Design and Analysis of Catalytic Converter of Automobile EngineIRJET- Design and Analysis of Catalytic Converter of Automobile Engine
IRJET- Design and Analysis of Catalytic Converter of Automobile Engine
 
Filtro Respiración CPF 20 y 80
Filtro Respiración CPF 20 y 80Filtro Respiración CPF 20 y 80
Filtro Respiración CPF 20 y 80
 
Hydraulic catalogue
Hydraulic catalogueHydraulic catalogue
Hydraulic catalogue
 
IRJET- CFD Flow Analysis of Station Pipeline
IRJET- CFD Flow Analysis of Station PipelineIRJET- CFD Flow Analysis of Station Pipeline
IRJET- CFD Flow Analysis of Station Pipeline
 
IRJET- CFD Simulation and Analysis of Fluid Flow through Concentric Reducer P...
IRJET- CFD Simulation and Analysis of Fluid Flow through Concentric Reducer P...IRJET- CFD Simulation and Analysis of Fluid Flow through Concentric Reducer P...
IRJET- CFD Simulation and Analysis of Fluid Flow through Concentric Reducer P...
 
Pump manual
Pump manualPump manual
Pump manual
 
Project training report
Project training report Project training report
Project training report
 
corruge pipe report.pdf
corruge pipe report.pdfcorruge pipe report.pdf
corruge pipe report.pdf
 
Industrial Boiler Optimization Toolkit
Industrial Boiler Optimization ToolkitIndustrial Boiler Optimization Toolkit
Industrial Boiler Optimization Toolkit
 
Sathiyaprabhu Piping Stress Engineer CV 2015
Sathiyaprabhu Piping Stress Engineer CV 2015Sathiyaprabhu Piping Stress Engineer CV 2015
Sathiyaprabhu Piping Stress Engineer CV 2015
 
IRJET- Fatigue Life Estimation of Turbine Bypass Valve
IRJET- Fatigue Life Estimation of Turbine Bypass ValveIRJET- Fatigue Life Estimation of Turbine Bypass Valve
IRJET- Fatigue Life Estimation of Turbine Bypass Valve
 
045
045045
045
 
Case studies in cfd analysis by kk parthiban
Case studies in cfd analysis by kk parthibanCase studies in cfd analysis by kk parthiban
Case studies in cfd analysis by kk parthiban
 
Fire Safety (Common Design Issues) .pptx
Fire Safety (Common Design Issues) .pptxFire Safety (Common Design Issues) .pptx
Fire Safety (Common Design Issues) .pptx
 
Design of Common Header Line for Reduction of Process Time in Pump Testing
Design of Common Header Line for Reduction of Process Time in Pump TestingDesign of Common Header Line for Reduction of Process Time in Pump Testing
Design of Common Header Line for Reduction of Process Time in Pump Testing
 
Work carried out on 21G62 between Nov 2015 - Feb 2016
Work carried out on 21G62 between Nov 2015 - Feb 2016Work carried out on 21G62 between Nov 2015 - Feb 2016
Work carried out on 21G62 between Nov 2015 - Feb 2016
 
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
 

Recently uploaded

International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...
International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...
International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...
gerogepatton
 
Modelagem de um CSTR com reação endotermica.pdf
Modelagem de um CSTR com reação endotermica.pdfModelagem de um CSTR com reação endotermica.pdf
Modelagem de um CSTR com reação endotermica.pdf
camseq
 
Optimizing Gradle Builds - Gradle DPE Tour Berlin 2024
Optimizing Gradle Builds - Gradle DPE Tour Berlin 2024Optimizing Gradle Builds - Gradle DPE Tour Berlin 2024
Optimizing Gradle Builds - Gradle DPE Tour Berlin 2024
Sinan KOZAK
 
132/33KV substation case study Presentation
132/33KV substation case study Presentation132/33KV substation case study Presentation
132/33KV substation case study Presentation
kandramariana6
 
Textile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdf
Textile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdfTextile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdf
Textile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdf
NazakatAliKhoso2
 
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming PipelinesHarnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Christina Lin
 
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptxML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
JamalHussainArman
 
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODEL
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODELDEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODEL
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODEL
gerogepatton
 
Generative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of content
Generative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of contentGenerative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of content
Generative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of content
Hitesh Mohapatra
 
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part II
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part IIRecycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part II
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part II
Aditya Rajan Patra
 
Properties Railway Sleepers and Test.pptx
Properties Railway Sleepers and Test.pptxProperties Railway Sleepers and Test.pptx
Properties Railway Sleepers and Test.pptx
MDSABBIROJJAMANPAYEL
 
Electric vehicle and photovoltaic advanced roles in enhancing the financial p...
Electric vehicle and photovoltaic advanced roles in enhancing the financial p...Electric vehicle and photovoltaic advanced roles in enhancing the financial p...
Electric vehicle and photovoltaic advanced roles in enhancing the financial p...
IJECEIAES
 
Heat Resistant Concrete Presentation ppt
Heat Resistant Concrete Presentation pptHeat Resistant Concrete Presentation ppt
Heat Resistant Concrete Presentation ppt
mamunhossenbd75
 
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
ihlasbinance2003
 
Eric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball play
Eric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball playEric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball play
Eric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball play
enizeyimana36
 
CHINA’S GEO-ECONOMIC OUTREACH IN CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES AND FUTURE PROSPECT
CHINA’S GEO-ECONOMIC OUTREACH IN CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES AND FUTURE PROSPECTCHINA’S GEO-ECONOMIC OUTREACH IN CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES AND FUTURE PROSPECT
CHINA’S GEO-ECONOMIC OUTREACH IN CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES AND FUTURE PROSPECT
jpsjournal1
 
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine LearningUnderstanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
SUTEJAS
 
CSM Cloud Service Management Presentarion
CSM Cloud Service Management PresentarionCSM Cloud Service Management Presentarion
CSM Cloud Service Management Presentarion
rpskprasana
 
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
IJECEIAES
 
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
University of Maribor
 

Recently uploaded (20)

International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...
International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...
International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...
 
Modelagem de um CSTR com reação endotermica.pdf
Modelagem de um CSTR com reação endotermica.pdfModelagem de um CSTR com reação endotermica.pdf
Modelagem de um CSTR com reação endotermica.pdf
 
Optimizing Gradle Builds - Gradle DPE Tour Berlin 2024
Optimizing Gradle Builds - Gradle DPE Tour Berlin 2024Optimizing Gradle Builds - Gradle DPE Tour Berlin 2024
Optimizing Gradle Builds - Gradle DPE Tour Berlin 2024
 
132/33KV substation case study Presentation
132/33KV substation case study Presentation132/33KV substation case study Presentation
132/33KV substation case study Presentation
 
Textile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdf
Textile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdfTextile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdf
Textile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdf
 
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming PipelinesHarnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
 
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptxML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
 
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODEL
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODELDEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODEL
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODEL
 
Generative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of content
Generative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of contentGenerative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of content
Generative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of content
 
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part II
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part IIRecycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part II
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part II
 
Properties Railway Sleepers and Test.pptx
Properties Railway Sleepers and Test.pptxProperties Railway Sleepers and Test.pptx
Properties Railway Sleepers and Test.pptx
 
Electric vehicle and photovoltaic advanced roles in enhancing the financial p...
Electric vehicle and photovoltaic advanced roles in enhancing the financial p...Electric vehicle and photovoltaic advanced roles in enhancing the financial p...
Electric vehicle and photovoltaic advanced roles in enhancing the financial p...
 
Heat Resistant Concrete Presentation ppt
Heat Resistant Concrete Presentation pptHeat Resistant Concrete Presentation ppt
Heat Resistant Concrete Presentation ppt
 
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
 
Eric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball play
Eric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball playEric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball play
Eric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball play
 
CHINA’S GEO-ECONOMIC OUTREACH IN CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES AND FUTURE PROSPECT
CHINA’S GEO-ECONOMIC OUTREACH IN CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES AND FUTURE PROSPECTCHINA’S GEO-ECONOMIC OUTREACH IN CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES AND FUTURE PROSPECT
CHINA’S GEO-ECONOMIC OUTREACH IN CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES AND FUTURE PROSPECT
 
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine LearningUnderstanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
 
CSM Cloud Service Management Presentarion
CSM Cloud Service Management PresentarionCSM Cloud Service Management Presentarion
CSM Cloud Service Management Presentarion
 
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
 
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
 

line sizing-mustang.pdf

  • 1. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Department Guidelines Rev. 0 REVISION and APPROVALS Rev. Date Description By Approved 0 01JUL04 Initial Issue JAP EP This document is the sole and exclusive property of Mustang, including all patented and patentable features and/or confidential information contained herein. Its use is conditioned upon the user's agreement not to: (i) reproduce the document, in whole or in part, nor the material described thereon; (ii) use the document for any purpose other than as specifically permitted in writing by Mustang; or (iii) disclose or otherwise disseminate or allow any such disclosure or dissemination of this document or its contents to others except as specifically permitted in writing by Mustang. "Mustang" as used herein refers to Mustang Engineering Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates. Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 1 of 20
  • 2. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SCOPE..........................................................................................................................................3 2.0 HYDRAULICS CALCULATION....................................................................................................3 2.1 Pressure Drop Criteria.......................................................................................................3 2.2 Equivalent Length of Valves and Fitting ............................................................................3 2.3 Flow Regimes of Vapor-Liquid Mixed Phase Flow............................................................3 3.0 LINE SIZING CRITERIA ...............................................................................................................3 4.0 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF EQUIVALENT LENGTH ............................................................4 4.1 Pump Discharge and Compressor Circuit .........................................................................4 4.2 Reboiler Inlet or Return Lines............................................................................................5 4.3 Pump Suction Line from Drums or Tower Bottoms ...........................................................5 5.0 SPECIAL HYDRAULICS CALCULATIONS.................................................................................5 5.1 Thermosyphon Reboiler Circuits .......................................................................................5 5.2 Kettle Reboiler Circuits......................................................................................................6 5.3 Pump NPSH and Pump Hydraulics Calculations ..............................................................6 5.4 Vacuum Tower Transfer Line Sizing .................................................................................6 APPENDICES...........................................................................................................................................8 Appendix A: References ..............................................................................................................8 Appendix B: Tables......................................................................................................................9 Table 1 - Liquid Flow Line Sizing Criteria....................................................................................10 Table 2 - Vapor and Gas Flow Line Sizing Criteria .....................................................................11 Table 3 - Two Phase Flow Line Sizing Criteria ...........................................................................12 Appendix C: Figures...................................................................................................................14 Figure 1 - Baker Chart, Flow Regimes of Two Phase Flow in Horizontal Pipes .........................15 Figure 2 - Aziz Chart, Flow Regimes of Two Phase Up-Flow in Vertical Pipes ..........................16 Figure 3 - Thermosyphon Reboiler Circuit Hydraulic Calculations..............................................17 Figure 4 - Kettle Type Reboiler Circuit Hydraulic Calculations....................................................19 Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 2 of 20
  • 3. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 1.0 SCOPE This section outlines the general guidelines for hydraulic calculation of piping systems. It is intended to provide a consistent approach to hydraulic calculations as performed by Process Engineers / Technical Professionals, but not to cover every special case one may encounter. Guidelines for calculating pressure drop through equipment such as trays, packings and reactors are included in other guidelines. 2.0 HYDRAULICS CALCULATION Mustang has several line sizing programs available in myMustang®. Refer to the Sizing page within the Process portal. Regardless of the program or method selected, there are independent variables to consider. 2.1 Pressure Drop Criteria Absolute Roughness Factor: use 0.00015 ft for commercial steel pipe. For non-steel pipe, use factors given in the Fluid Flow section of the GPSA Engineering Data Book [2]. Pipe Age Factor: use 1.2 unless noted otherwise in the design basis for a specific project. For vapor-liquid mixed phase, the Hughmark "in-place” density may be used, where available as an option, for calculating static head. 2.2 Equivalent Length of Valves and Fitting Use the table shown as Figure 17-4 in the GPSA Engineering Data Book [2]. Spreadsheet templates which use average L/D ratios and yield essentially the same equivalent lengths may also be used. Optionally, Crane No. 410 [1] provides equations for calculating valve and fitting losses as velocity head equivalents. 2.3 Flow Regimes of Vapor-Liquid Mixed Phase Flow • Horizontal flow: Use Baker chart shown in Figure 1. • Vertical flow: Use the Aziz Chart, Figure 2, via Reference 2. This figure is considered to be conservative and valid for pressure up to 150 psig, which covers the range of concern. 3.0 LINE SIZING CRITERIA Tables 1, 2, and 3 in Appendix B give some typical "rules of thumb" for line sizing. Although these rules are applicable to most situations, they may not be suitable in all cases. For critical circuits, hydraulics should be checked in detail to confirm the available pressure drop regardless of whether the lines meet rules-of-thumb criteria. In addition, the optimum line size is determined by balancing the capital cost of the piping system against the operating cost of pumps and/or compressors. To minimize initial investment, special attention should be given to expensive lines, for example: Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 3 of 20
  • 4. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 • Alloy pipe • Carbon steel pipe larger than 12” • Piping system involving many valves and fitting such as dryers • Lines longer than 500 ft In corrosive and erosive environments, however, the line shall be sized based on maximum velocity considerations to provide satisfactory service life. When a new or unfamiliar service is encountered, the Process Design Manager shall be consulted for line sizing criteria as well as its material selection. 4.0 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF EQUIVALENT LENGTH The following data can be used for preliminary estimates of equivalent length when detail piping information, such as isometrics, is not available. 4.1 Pump Discharge and Compressor Circuit Piping Size, inches On-site L eq./L straight Off-site L eq./L straight 1-1/2 1.30 1.09 2 1.41 1.14 3 1.57 1.18 4 1.74 1.23 6 2.12 1.36 8 2.43 1.42 10 2.82 1.55 12 3.15 1.65 14 3.41 1.74 16 3.75 1.83 18 4.14 1.92 20 4.51 2.06 24 5.19 2.24 These typically conservative equivalent length ratios (to be used for budget estimates) only are estimated based on the following assumptions: • For on-site systems: each 100 feet of piping having one fully open gate valve, one swing check valve, one hard tee and four long radius elbows. • For offsite systems: each 100 feet of piping with one fully open gate valve and four long radius elbows. Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 4 of 20
  • 5. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 4.2 Reboiler Inlet or Return Lines Pipe Size, inches Typical Equivalent Length, ft 4 100 6 120 8 140 10 160 12 180 14 200 16 220 18 250 20 280 24 330 30 420 If the reboiler is spring supported, the equivalent length can be substantially reduced. 4.3 Pump Suction Line from Drums or Tower Bottoms Pipe Size, inches Typical Equivalent Length, ft through 6" 300 8" – 12” 400 14" and larger 250 pipe diameters + 150 Notes: • If a permanent strainer is installed in the pump suction line, add 200 ft of equivalent length to calculate the pressure drop through the strainer. If a temporary strainer is used, the Process Engineer / Technical Professional should clarify with client if it will stay in place during normal operation. • The equivalent length for pump suction taken from a tower side draw-off can be substantially higher than those shown above. 5.0 SPECIAL HYDRAULICS CALCULATIONS 5.1 Thermosyphon Reboiler Circuits The worksheet shown on Figure 3 should be used to analyze the reboiler circuit hydraulics for thermosyphon reboilers. Design considerations for the thermosyphon reboiler system are as follows: • Do not use the usual age factor of 1.2 for line friction loss. Instead, use a safety factor of 2 for line friction loss and allowable total reboiler pressure drop when using homogenous mixed phase density and a safety factor of 1.5 when using Hughmark in-place density, whichever is more conservative. The criteria may be relaxed for revamp projects or those systems having high densities in the reboiler return line such as a deethanizer tower reboiler. Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 5 of 20
  • 6. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 • Use the percent vaporization specified in the reboiler data sheet. Recirculating thermosyphon reboilers are generally designed for 30 wt% vaporization. Once-through thermosyphon reboilers can have up to 50 wt% vaporization. • Process Engineer / Technical Professional should check the actual operating pressure of the reboiler if the mean temperature difference between the heating medium and circulation fluid is sensitive to pressure variation. The pressure of the boiling medium in the thermosyphon reboiler is equal to the tower operating pressure plus riser losses including static head based on in-place density. • The reboiler return line should be sized to avoid slugging problems. However, this may not always be possible without an excessive elevation of skirt height, especially for light ends towers operated at high pressure. It is generally recognized that towers operated above a certain operating pressure (subject to engineering judgment), slug flow may not exist or is not detrimental to a reboiler/tower operation. 5.2 Kettle Reboiler Circuits The worksheet shown on Figure 4 should be used for hydraulic calculations associated with kettle reboiler circuits. Design considerations for the kettle reboiler system are as follows: • Use a safety factor of 1.5 for line friction loss and allowable total reboiler pressure drop. • If the product from the kettle reboiler flows to a pump suction, the elevation of kettle should also satisfy pump NPSH requirement. • If the product from the kettle reboiler flows to a heat exchanger first, free drain from the kettle to exchanger is preferred. This is not a mandatory requirement if the product is of multi-component mixtures with wide boiling ranges. However, the pipe length and elevation rise shall be minimized. 5.3 Pump NPSH and Pump Hydraulics Calculations Refer to “Pumps" [3] for calculation guidelines and procedures. 5.4 Vacuum Tower Transfer Line Sizing Transfer lines in crude vacuum units are typically very large and are constructed of expensive alloy material. It is imperative that the process designer perform a detailed hydraulic calculation to select the smallest line size. The maximum velocity should be limited to 90% of sonic velocity. It usually occurs at the inlet nozzle to the vacuum tower. Sonic velocity is expressed as: VS = 68.1(kP/ρ)1/2 VS sonic velocity, ft/s k the specific heat ratio, Cp/Cv P the absolute pressure, psia ρ the homogeneous mixed phase density, lb/ft3 The total pressure drop from the heater outlet to the tower inlet is limited by the heater outlet temperature, which is typically 25°F higher than the flash zone temperature and Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 6 of 20
  • 7. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 should generally be limited to 780°F maximum due to the concern of excessive cracking and coking. The design of the transfer line may proceed as follows: • Starting at the flash zone condition, run a series of adiabatic flashes on the vacuum tower charge, with a pressure increment of approximately 25% of the downstream absolute pressure. • Select the transfer line size based on the sonic velocity limitation stated above. • Divide the line into several segments. Calculate or estimate the equivalent length of each segment. Start from the tower inlet nozzle, calculate the pressure drop in each line segment using the following equation: 100 ) 100 / ( 144 2 V ∆P 2 1 2 2 L P g V frict avg × ∆ + × − = ρ Acceleration Loss Friction Pressure Drop ∆P total pressure drop, psi V1 upstream velocity, ft/s V2 downstream velocity, ft/s (∆P/100)frict friction pressure drop, psi/100 ft L total equivalent length, ft g 32.2 ft/s2 Pavg average mixed phase density, lb/ft3 The acceleration loss in vacuum service can be a significant part of the total pressure drop and should not be neglected. Since the amount of flashing depends on the pressure, the above calculations are iterative. • The pressure drop between the heater outlet and flash zone (typically 3 psi) is the sum of the pressure drops for all line segments. The heater outlet temperature can then be obtained from the pressure-temperature relationship which is generated from the adiabatic flashes in step (a). • If the calculated heater outlet temperature exceeds the allowable maximum, a larger transfer line is selected and steps a. through d. are repeated until the temperature limitation is satisfied. It should be noted that this rarely occurs unless the transfer line is unusually long or the flash zone temperature already approaches the maximum allowable temperature. • If the calculated heater outlet temperature is more than 10°F lower than the allowable maximum, a reduction in the line size between the tower and furnace may be justified. The Process Engineer / Technical Professional should check the sonic velocity criteria at the point of line size reduction. Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 7 of 20
  • 8. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 APPENDICES Appendix A: References [1] “Flow of Fluids through Valves, Fittings, and Pipe,” Crane Technical Paper No. 410, 1988. [2] “Fluid Flow and Piping,” GPSA Engineering Data Book, 10th ed., 1987, Section 17, Volume II. [3] “Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Pumps”, Mustang Department Guidelines, DG-PPG-0107. [4] KYPIPE User's Manual. [5] "Centrifugal Compressor Inlet Piping - A Practical Guide," Elliott Compressor, Reprint No. 117. Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 8 of 20
  • 9. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 Appendix B: Tables Table No. Title 1 Liquid Flow Line Sizing Criteria 2 Vapor and Gas Flow Line Sizing Criteria 3 Two Phase Flow Line Sizing Criteria Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 9 of 20
  • 10. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 Table 1 - Liquid Flow Line Sizing Criteria Typical Pressure Maximum Drop Velocity Service psi/100 ft ft/s Remarks 1. Pump suction (General Service) a) Liquid at boiling point or 0.5 max. 3 (4" & smaller) 3.0 ft/s max. for vacuum tower bottoms less than 50°F below it 5 (6”-10") pump regardless of sizes. 6 (12" & larger) b) Sub-cooled liquids 2.0 max. 8 Higher than 8 ft/s is acceptable if there is (50°F below boiling point) substantial length of straight pipe (5 times of pipe dia.) just ahead of the pump suction. 2. Side stream draw-off 0.2 max. (Note 1) 3. Liquid to non-pumped reboiler 0.2 (Note 1) The allowable pressure drop (psi/100ft) can be higher if larger elevation difference is available. 4. Gravity flow (in waste water 0.5 max. 2.5 ft/s min. The available liquid head treating unit, etc.) should be at least two times the friction loss calculated based on piping layout. 5. Pump discharge (Gen. Service) 4.0 max. 15 (Note 2) 6. Cooling water Short lead 2.0 max. 15 The velocity should be above Long header 1.0 max. 15 3 ft/s to prevent excessive fouling. 7. Corrosive liquids Sulfuric acid service 3.0 (C.S.) (Note 3) in Alky Unit 6.0 (316 S.S.) “ 8.0 (Alloy 20) Rich amine (liquid phase) 5.0 (C.S.) (Note 4) Lean amine 7.0 (C.S.) Caustic (lower than 140°F) 5.0 (C.S.) 8. Erosive liquids FCC slurry 7 3 ft/s min. to prevent settling of catalyst fines. 9. High available delta P 5.0 max 20 Should consider erosion and possible vaporization. 10. Sea water in concrete 10.0 lined pipe Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 10 of 20
  • 11. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 Table 2 - Vapor and Gas Flow Line Sizing Criteria Typical Pressure Maximum Drop Velocity Service psi/100 ft ft/s Remarks 1. Column overhead and condenser rundown For tower operated under high vacuum 10 mmHg abs. 0.01 100/(ρ) 1/2 condition, calculation based on piping 50 mmHg abs. 0.05 or 300 ft/s layout is required. Typically, the pressure 380 mmHg abs. 0.1 whichever is drop between tower and ejector in crude Atmospheric - 50 psig 0.2 lower. vacuum column overhead is 1-2 mmHg. 50 psig - 150 psig 0.4 Higher ∆P/100 ft may be used for towers 150 psig + 0.6 operated at high pressure and line pressure drop only constitutes ≤ 0.5% of operating pressure. 2. Oil vapors 10 mmHg abs. 0.01 100/(ρg) 1/2 or 50 mmHg abs. 0.06 300 ft/s 380 mmHg abs. 0.2 whichever is Atmospheric - 50 psig 0.5 lower. 50 psig - 150 psig 1.5 150 psig + 2.5 3. Steam 0 - 50 psig headers 0.5 100/( ρg) 1/2 or laterals 1.5 300 ft/s 150 psig headers 1.0 whichever is laterals 2.5 lower. 300 psig+ headers 2.5 laterals 4.0 4. Condensing Steam Turbine 450 Calculation based on exhaust piping layout is required. Typically, the pressure drop between turbine and first condenser is 0.2 psi for air cooled condenser and 0.1 psi for water cooled condenser. In many cases, the line size is governed by velocity limitation. 5. Kettle Reboiler Return 0.1 - 0.2 6. Compressor Suction Reciprocating (Note 5) For multistage compressors, the usual allowable interstage pressure drop Centrifugal (Note 6) exclusive of pulsation dampers Is the larger of 5 to 7 psi or 1% of system absolute pressure for a single exchanger, separator and associated piping. Increase the pressure drop if there is additional equipment. 7. FCC Reactor Vapor 0.2 max. 100 Higher velocity results in excessive to Fractionator erosion from catalyst fines. 8. Column Hot Vapor Bypass 0.5 Typically, the flowrate of hot vapor bypass ranges from 10 to 15% of gross column overhead vapor flowrate. Process Engineer to confirm the flowrate based on heat transfer calculation. Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 11 of 20
  • 12. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 Table 3 - Two Phase Flow Line Sizing Criteria Typical Pressure Maximum Drop Velocity Service psi/100 ft ft/s Remarks 1. Thermosiphon Reboiler Return 0.1-0.2 Can be higher if large elevation difference is available. See Section 5.1 for other considerations. 2. Other Two-Phase Lines 10 mmHg abs. 0.01 Max. velocity Except crude vacuum tower 50 mmHg abs. 0.06 is 100/(ρmix) 1/2 transfer line where the 380 mmHg abs. 0.02 or 300 ft/s maximum velocity is Atmospheric - 50 psig 0.5 whichever is discussed in Section 5.4. 50 - 150 psig 1.5 lower. ρmix is 150 psig + 2.5 the homogeneous mixed density in lb/ft 3 . Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 12 of 20
  • 13. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 Notes for Tables 1, 2, and 3: 1) Saturated liquid draw-off from vessel should be adequately sized to avoid vaporization and vortexing at the draw-off nozzle. The maximum allowable velocity is calculated as Vmax = 3.858 (hmin)½ or hmin = (Vmax / 3.858)2 Vmax : maximum allowable velocity through the draw-off nozzle, ft/s hmin : the liquid static head above the centerline of draw-off nozzle, ft Equation for Vmax is valid only when the liquid head is at least one-half of the nozzle diameter above the top edge of draw-off nozzle. The depth of draw-off sump should be a minimum of 1½ times the nozzle diameter. See Mustang Process Design Guidelines, Section B, Towers. The line should turn down immediately and should be a minimum of 6 ft vertical drop before being swaged down to calculated line sizes. 2) Process engineer should confirm the total pressure drop based on actual piping or plot layouts especially if high ∆P/100 ft is used to size long lines. 3) Typically, the acid strength ranges from 93% to 99% in the Alky unit. Selection of piping materials depends on factors including size, velocity, flow turbulence and temperature. Consult with a Sr. level Process Engineer about the material selection and allowable velocity criteria. For further details, see Mustang Process Design Guidelines, Section M, Materials of Construction. 4) Stainless steel pipe is commonly used in areas where acid gas is flashed out of rich amine solution. However, for long runs, heavy wall carbon steel pipe may be used in lieu of stainless steel. 5) The line size and piping layout may be dictated by the compressor acoustic analog study. 6) If inlet and discharge nozzles are oriented normal to compressor shaft and there are three diameters of straight pipe just ahead of compressor inlet, the maximum velocity in the inlet is Vmax = (995 T/M)1/2 Vmax : maximum allowable velocity in the suction of centrifugal compressor, ft/s T : inlet temperature, OR M : gas molecular weight Vmax will be lower if the inlet line has less than three pipe diameters of straight run pipe. A review of inlet piping systems as related to compressor performance is presented in Reference 5. 7) In general, the vapor-liquid mixed phase line should be sized to avoid the slug flow. Wherever this becomes impractical and results in excessive pressure drop, a Sr. level Process Engineer should be consulted. Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 13 of 20
  • 14. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 Appendix C: Figures Figure No. Title 1 Baker Chart, Flow Regimes of Two Phase Flow in Horizontal Pipes (1 page) 2 Aziz Chart, Flow Regimes of Two Phase Up-Flow in Vertical Pipes (1 page) 3 Thermosyphon Reboiler Circuit Hydraulic Calculations (2 pages) 4 Kettle Type Reboiler Circuit Hydraulic Calculations (2 pages) Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 14 of 20
  • 15. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 Figure 1 - Baker Chart, Flow Regimes of Two Phase Flow in Horizontal Pipes Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 15 of 20
  • 16. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 Figure 2 - Aziz Chart, Flow Regimes of Two Phase Up-Flow in Vertical Pipes Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 16 of 20
  • 17. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 Figure 3 - Thermosyphon Reboiler Circuit Hydraulic Calculations OPERATING COMMONS - INLET OPERATING CONDITIONS - OUTLET Temperature. o F _________ Temperature. o F ___________ Pressure, psig _________ Pressure, psig ___________ Liquid density. ρ1, @T. lb/ft3 _________ Avg. L/V mixed density, ρ2 @T&P, lb/ft3 ___________ Flow, Liq- lb/h _________ Inplace density, ρ3 @T&P. lb/ft3 ___________ Flow. Liq., lb/h ___________ Flow. Vap., lb/h ___________ LINE FRICTION LOSS - INLET LINE FRICTION LOSS - OUTLET Line size, in _________ Line size. In ___________ ∆P per 100 ft. psi _________ ∆P per 100 ft, psi ___________ Equiv. length. ft _________ Equiv. length. Ft ___________ Friction loss (fil), psi _________ Friction loss (fol). Psi ___________ Tower nozzle loss (fin). psi _________ Tower nozzle loss (fon). Psi ___________ Total inlet press. drop fi=fil+fin. Psi _______ Total outlet press. drop fo=fol+fon. Psi ___________ Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 17 of 20
  • 18. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 CALCULATE RESISTANCE TO FLOW A. RESISTANCE CALCULATION BASED ON AVG. MIXED DENSITY (NOTE 2) 1. ∆P (reboiler) allowed * safety factor (______), psi ________ 2. Total line friction loss (fi+fo) * safety factor (______), psi ________ 3. Static head in return line, Ft = h2 ________ 4. Static head in return line, psi = h2 * ρ2 / 144 ________ 5. Total resistance to flow (Pr1), psi = #1 + #2 + #4 ________ B. RESISTANCE CALCULATION BASED ON IN-PLACE DENSITY (NOTE 2) 6. ∆P (reboiler) allowed * safety factor (______), psi ________ 7. Total line friction loss (fi+fo) * safety factor (______), psi ________ 8. Static head in return line, Ft = h2 ________ 9. Static head in return line, psi = h2 * ρ3 / 144 ________ 10. Total resistance to flow (Pr2), psi = #6 + #7 + #9 ________ CALCULATE DRIVING FORCE 1. Required driving head (h3) based on avg. density, ft = (2.31 * Pr1) / ( ρ1 / 62.37) ________ 2. Required driving head (h4) based on in-place density, ft = (2.31 * Pr2) / (ρ1 / 62.37) ________ 3. Actual driving head available (h1), ft ________ 4. If h1 is > h3 and h4. it is O.K. ________ Notes: 1. It should be confirmed with the equipment engineer that the ∆P allowed for reboiler shall be from inlet nozzle flange to outlet nozzle flange, including static head. 2. For a new unit, use a safety factor of 2.0 based on average mixed density, and 1.5 based on in- place density. Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 18 of 20
  • 19. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 Figure 4 - Kettle Type Reboiler Circuit Hydraulic Calculations OPERATING CONDITIONS - INLET OPERATING CONDITIONS - OUTLET Temperature, o F ________ Temperature, o F ________ Pressure, psig ________ Pressure, psig ________ Liquid density, ρ1, @T. lb/ft3 ________ Vapor density. ρ2, @T. lb/ft3 ________ Flow, Liquid lb/h ________ Flow, Vapor lb/h ________ LINE FRICTION LOSS INLET LINE FRICTION LOSS - OUTLET Line size, In. ________ Line size, In. ________ ∆P per 100 ft, psi ________ ∆P per 100 ft, psi ________ Equiv. Length, ft ________ Equiv. Length, ft ________ Friction loss (fil), psi ________ Friction loss (fol), psi ________ Tower nozzle loss (fin), psi ________ Tower nozzle loss (fon), psi ________ Total inlet press. drop fi = fil+fin, psi ________ Total inlet press. drop fo = fol+fon, psi ________ Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 19 of 20
  • 20. DG-PPG-0110 Document No. MUSTANG Process Plants Process Design Guidelines: Hydraulics and Line Sizing Rev. 0 Document is valid only at time of printing. See myMustang® for latest revision. DG-PPG-0110_Process Plants Process Design Guidelines Hydraulics and Line Sizing Page 20 of 20 CALCULATE RESISTANCE TO FLOW (NOTE 2) 1. ∆P (reboiler) allowed * safety factor (______), psi ________ 2. Total line friction loss (fi+fo) * safety factor (______), psi ________ 3. Static head in return line, Ft = h2 ________ 4. Static head in return line, psi = h2 * ρ2 / 144 ________ 5. Total resistance to flow (Pr1), psi = #1 + #2 + #4 ________ CALCULATE DRIVING FORCE 1. Required driving head (h), ft = (2.31 * Pr) / ( ρ1 / 62.37) ________ 2. Actual driving head available (h1), ft ________ 3. If h1 is > h, it is O.K. ________ Notes: 1. It should be confirmed with equipment engineer that ∆P allowed for reboiler shall be from inlet nozzle flange to outlet nozzle flange. 2. For new unit, use safety factor of 1.5