This document provides an overview of developing a personal and home protection plan. It discusses the importance of conflict avoidance and situational awareness. It introduces the "color codes of awareness" which include condition white (unaware), condition yellow (aware), condition orange (heightened awareness), and condition red (action). The document emphasizes avoiding dangerous situations through awareness of one's surroundings and de-escalation. If a threat cannot be avoided, it discusses being prepared to escape or defend oneself as a last resort.
Richard Sherman made headlines after an emotional post-game interview following his pivotal play in the NFC Championship. Many reacted negatively, calling him names like "thug" without knowing his background. As an African American man with success, the criticism had racial undertones. Sherman graduated second in his high school class and from Stanford with high grades, never having legal or conduct issues. While Sherman expressed real emotions, the harsh reaction said more about lingering racism and prejudice in society than about Sherman as a person.
Dr. Steve Albrecht presented an active shooter training webinar for library employees. He discussed 10 common misconceptions people have about active shooters and emphasized that they are there to kill, not talk, within 5-10 minutes before police arrive. The training covered establishing safe rooms, communicating with 911 dispatchers, recognizing responding police officers, and conducting annual drills to prepare staff to run, hide, or fight if an attack occurs. Albrecht stressed the importance of employee vigilance, rapid but measured responses to threats, and partnerships with law enforcement to help keep libraries safe.
Paul Ekman's research examines why most people are poor at detecting lies from another person's behavior or demeanor. In experiments where students were asked to lie or tell the truth about low-stake topics, those trying to detect lies typically performed at chance levels or slightly better. Ekman conducted experiments with higher-stakes lies that were personally relevant to motivate stronger emotional responses that could reveal deceit. However, detection rates remained low even in these high-stake scenarios. Ekman argues more realistic experiments are needed that include consequences for both truth-tellers and liars to reflect real-world situations where detection is important.
Can or should Zimmerman be tried again? What if there was no FAIR trial BY JURY the first time? It can't be double jeopardy then, can it? Even that can be overcome because there is enough evidence to try him for FIRST DEGREE murder, and it was all sent to the prosecution and ignored. What we need is the NEXT Rosa Parks to stand up in 47 States and insist on their right to question witnesses. It's already done in 3 States, so it cannot be unconstitutional. Where the jury did NOT question witnesses, the verdict was rendered on an incomplete record, and incomplete records ARE, by nature, inaccurate. The verdict cannot stand and if challenged to the Supreme Court level of the State, it will fall. Neither the accused nor the State got a fair trial, so, in effect, there was NO trial. The State has equal rights to a fair trial. Why is that,you ask? Because all criminal actions are brought in the name of the People of the State. Why is THAT, you ask? Because it is the State (via elected officials) who are charged with protecting and maintaining the welfare of the people. One miscreant running around, free to move to other States to commit more, and possibly worse, crimes, is one too many. That is why the slides prompt readers to take action to make history. Moving justice from the bus to the courtroom takes only one juror in each State to stand up and announce he has a question for a witness and no, he cannot hold the question until the time for deliberations, as an inaccurate record will form the basis for those deliberations! Who would dare stop such a courageous juror? At the risk of his job? No one. Jurors are summoned to court for possible selection. That right there confirms how important our Founding Forefathers thought putting ordinary people (with common sense and reasoning) into the room where another ordinary citizen has been accused. The jurors SERVE AS THE CHECKS AND BALANCE against corruption of the case by either side. Hence, the lawsuit contemplated by the medical examiner that the prosecution deliberately threw the case, would be truly tested. No one could throw a case when jurors question witnesses because it would require bribing all 12 of them (or 6 of them), and the odds that there wouldn't be one honest person diminish greatly under those circumstances. These slides demonstrate what the book explains in-depth about the fallacy of the 5th Amendment, also. We all have been led to believe that attorneys are smarter than the rest of us, but this case shows differently. We're all strong in different areas; hence, the idiom 'two heads are better than one.' So, who was it who started the rumor that jurors could not question witnesses and simply sat back and watched us bite? who was it that perverted the real meaning of the 5th Amendment? Try this on for size: One has a right against self-incrimination, but under the rules of honor and dishonor, no one has the right to deprive the other side of a fair trial.
The document summarizes research conducted to inform the opening sequence of a thriller film. It describes analyzing the top 50 thriller films to identify popular subgenres. Crime thrillers were found to be most common. Interviews revealed a preference for psychological and eco-thrillers over techno thrillers. A survey showed action thrillers and suspense are most popular elements, with common cliches disliked. The research will help make an opening sequence avoiding cliches in a popular but less common subgenre.
This document discusses lies and their consequences. It defines different types of lies like lies by omission and white lies. It also examines how to tell if someone is lying and lists some common lies people tell like "I'm fine" or "That was my last piece of gum." The document warns that lies may hurt for a little while but the truth always comes out, and advises that the truth is always true even if it isn't said. It uses examples from Bill Clinton to illustrate lies and their consequences.
The document discusses the concept of mens rea in criminal law. It begins by defining mens rea as the "guilty mind" or voluntary choice to commit an offense. It then discusses different types of mens rea, including direct intent, oblique intent, and recklessness. It analyzes several important cases that helped develop the tests for determining these mental states, such as R v Mohan, R v Woollin, and R v Caldwell. The document also discusses related concepts like transferred intent and the requirement that the actus reus and mens rea coincide for liability. Overall, the document provides a detailed overview of the development of mens rea in English criminal law.
This document defines an active shooter and outlines characteristics and responses. It begins by defining an active shooter as someone actively killing people in a populated area without a clear victim selection pattern. It describes historic shooters and notes that shooters often have feelings of alienation and persecution. The document outlines characteristics like anti-social behavior, aggression, and relationship issues. It discusses the 5 phases of active shooters and recommends notifying authorities about concerning behaviors. For responses, it recommends evacuating if possible, locking down if not, taking action against the shooter as a last resort, and cooperating with first responders.
Richard Sherman made headlines after an emotional post-game interview following his pivotal play in the NFC Championship. Many reacted negatively, calling him names like "thug" without knowing his background. As an African American man with success, the criticism had racial undertones. Sherman graduated second in his high school class and from Stanford with high grades, never having legal or conduct issues. While Sherman expressed real emotions, the harsh reaction said more about lingering racism and prejudice in society than about Sherman as a person.
Dr. Steve Albrecht presented an active shooter training webinar for library employees. He discussed 10 common misconceptions people have about active shooters and emphasized that they are there to kill, not talk, within 5-10 minutes before police arrive. The training covered establishing safe rooms, communicating with 911 dispatchers, recognizing responding police officers, and conducting annual drills to prepare staff to run, hide, or fight if an attack occurs. Albrecht stressed the importance of employee vigilance, rapid but measured responses to threats, and partnerships with law enforcement to help keep libraries safe.
Paul Ekman's research examines why most people are poor at detecting lies from another person's behavior or demeanor. In experiments where students were asked to lie or tell the truth about low-stake topics, those trying to detect lies typically performed at chance levels or slightly better. Ekman conducted experiments with higher-stakes lies that were personally relevant to motivate stronger emotional responses that could reveal deceit. However, detection rates remained low even in these high-stake scenarios. Ekman argues more realistic experiments are needed that include consequences for both truth-tellers and liars to reflect real-world situations where detection is important.
Can or should Zimmerman be tried again? What if there was no FAIR trial BY JURY the first time? It can't be double jeopardy then, can it? Even that can be overcome because there is enough evidence to try him for FIRST DEGREE murder, and it was all sent to the prosecution and ignored. What we need is the NEXT Rosa Parks to stand up in 47 States and insist on their right to question witnesses. It's already done in 3 States, so it cannot be unconstitutional. Where the jury did NOT question witnesses, the verdict was rendered on an incomplete record, and incomplete records ARE, by nature, inaccurate. The verdict cannot stand and if challenged to the Supreme Court level of the State, it will fall. Neither the accused nor the State got a fair trial, so, in effect, there was NO trial. The State has equal rights to a fair trial. Why is that,you ask? Because all criminal actions are brought in the name of the People of the State. Why is THAT, you ask? Because it is the State (via elected officials) who are charged with protecting and maintaining the welfare of the people. One miscreant running around, free to move to other States to commit more, and possibly worse, crimes, is one too many. That is why the slides prompt readers to take action to make history. Moving justice from the bus to the courtroom takes only one juror in each State to stand up and announce he has a question for a witness and no, he cannot hold the question until the time for deliberations, as an inaccurate record will form the basis for those deliberations! Who would dare stop such a courageous juror? At the risk of his job? No one. Jurors are summoned to court for possible selection. That right there confirms how important our Founding Forefathers thought putting ordinary people (with common sense and reasoning) into the room where another ordinary citizen has been accused. The jurors SERVE AS THE CHECKS AND BALANCE against corruption of the case by either side. Hence, the lawsuit contemplated by the medical examiner that the prosecution deliberately threw the case, would be truly tested. No one could throw a case when jurors question witnesses because it would require bribing all 12 of them (or 6 of them), and the odds that there wouldn't be one honest person diminish greatly under those circumstances. These slides demonstrate what the book explains in-depth about the fallacy of the 5th Amendment, also. We all have been led to believe that attorneys are smarter than the rest of us, but this case shows differently. We're all strong in different areas; hence, the idiom 'two heads are better than one.' So, who was it who started the rumor that jurors could not question witnesses and simply sat back and watched us bite? who was it that perverted the real meaning of the 5th Amendment? Try this on for size: One has a right against self-incrimination, but under the rules of honor and dishonor, no one has the right to deprive the other side of a fair trial.
The document summarizes research conducted to inform the opening sequence of a thriller film. It describes analyzing the top 50 thriller films to identify popular subgenres. Crime thrillers were found to be most common. Interviews revealed a preference for psychological and eco-thrillers over techno thrillers. A survey showed action thrillers and suspense are most popular elements, with common cliches disliked. The research will help make an opening sequence avoiding cliches in a popular but less common subgenre.
This document discusses lies and their consequences. It defines different types of lies like lies by omission and white lies. It also examines how to tell if someone is lying and lists some common lies people tell like "I'm fine" or "That was my last piece of gum." The document warns that lies may hurt for a little while but the truth always comes out, and advises that the truth is always true even if it isn't said. It uses examples from Bill Clinton to illustrate lies and their consequences.
The document discusses the concept of mens rea in criminal law. It begins by defining mens rea as the "guilty mind" or voluntary choice to commit an offense. It then discusses different types of mens rea, including direct intent, oblique intent, and recklessness. It analyzes several important cases that helped develop the tests for determining these mental states, such as R v Mohan, R v Woollin, and R v Caldwell. The document also discusses related concepts like transferred intent and the requirement that the actus reus and mens rea coincide for liability. Overall, the document provides a detailed overview of the development of mens rea in English criminal law.
This document defines an active shooter and outlines characteristics and responses. It begins by defining an active shooter as someone actively killing people in a populated area without a clear victim selection pattern. It describes historic shooters and notes that shooters often have feelings of alienation and persecution. The document outlines characteristics like anti-social behavior, aggression, and relationship issues. It discusses the 5 phases of active shooters and recommends notifying authorities about concerning behaviors. For responses, it recommends evacuating if possible, locking down if not, taking action against the shooter as a last resort, and cooperating with first responders.
This document provides guidance on responding to an active shooter situation on campus. It defines an active shooter as an immediate threat causing death or serious injury. It instructs faculty and staff to secure the area, treat injuries, contact emergency services, and provide assailant details. Law enforcement will work to contain the threat before evacuating or treating injuries. The goal is to neutralize the assailant who will not stop until objectives are met. Historical perspectives on campus shooters are also presented.
The document discusses the benign violation theory of humor, which is that something is funny when it violates social norms or expectations in a way that seems harmless or acceptable. Two researchers, Peter McGraw and Caleb Warren, developed this theory to explain what makes things humorous. Humor arises from benign violations because realizing a threat is not actually harmful can transform a negative experience into a positive one through amusement.
This document provides information about the A.L.I.C.E. response strategy for responding to active shooter situations. It discusses how traditional lockdown approaches are insufficient on their own and limit options for survival. A.L.I.C.E. training teaches people to Alert others to danger, Lockdown if escape is not possible, counter aggressors if needed to survive, provide real-time Information updates, and Evacuate to safety if possible. The goal is to give people more options than passive hiding by teaching mental preparation, situational awareness, and how to take active measures like distraction and swarming attackers if necessary to survive until help arrives.
The document discusses lying and deception from several perspectives. It provides definitions of lying and notes that people typically lie one to two times per day, usually about feelings, preferences, and opinions. Philosophers like Plato, Augustine, and Kant generally held that lying is wrong, though Plato allowed for exceptions. The size of the neocortex correlates with deception rates in primates. Polygraphs measure stress, not deception directly, and their accuracy is limited.
The document summarizes the results of a survey about audience preferences for thriller films. It found that the majority of respondents were males under 30 years old who watch thrillers weekly. They preferred psychological thrillers over action thrillers and expected to see some violence. Knives and crowbars were the most preferred props for violent scenes. The data will help inform planning conventions for a thriller being developed, which seems aligned with audience expectations for the genre.
This document discusses media effects and violence, covering several areas of study on the topic. It examines empirical data which has both proved and disproved links between media violence and real-life aggression. Social psychology experiments like the Bobo doll experiments are mentioned. Neuropsychology research shows how viewing violent images activates threat-related brain areas. Quantitative data on violence in media is still important. The psychological effects discussed include potential increases in aggression, desensitization, and the "mean world syndrome." Two cases of real-life murders apparently inspired by the TV show Dexter are provided as examples of moral panics around media effects.
Social Judgment Theory (SJT) predicts the success of persuasion based on how close or far a message is from a person's existing beliefs. SJT includes three concepts: latitude of acceptance (ideas a person agrees with), latitude of rejection (ideas strongly disagreed with), and latitude of noncommitment (neutral ideas). To successfully persuade, the argument must fall within a person's latitude of acceptance. SJT also notes that people more invested in a topic have a narrower range of acceptance and are harder to persuade. Examples show how SJT predicts a person would evaluate arguments of different distances from their initial view on a topic.
The document discusses the results of a questionnaire conducted to gain insights into viewers' preferences for thriller movies. It finds that over 50% of participants are aged 16, so the movie opening would need to suit that age group. It also finds that psychological thrillers and crime thrillers are the most preferred subgenres, with Batman and Inception being the most popular movies from those subgenres. The results indicate that the movie should feature elements of mystery, enigma and suspense, and be set in a city environment.
This document defines conspiracy theories and discusses what makes for a justified conspiracy theory. It notes that to be justified, a conspiracy theory should have low reliance on eyewitness testimony and pass tests for a good explanation. A good explanation should be simple, falsifiable, and the hypothesis must be testable by determining what other observations would be expected if the explanation were correct rather than just because it is the only explanation available. Examples are provided of explanations that fail these tests.
Responding to Harassment: Moving Past Feminism 101Kassandra Perch
This document summarizes the typical cycle of reactions that occurs when someone reports harassment in the tech industry. It describes four main stages: 1) A marginalized person reports harassment and faces risks in doing so, 2) A group denies the report through tactics like demanding proof or character assassination, 3) Others claim to be shocked but do little to address the underlying issues, and 4) The victim is often left isolated with little support as attention moves elsewhere. The document urges moving past shock and denial to have real discussions acknowledging the systemic problems and supporting victims who come forward.
The questionnaire results showed that over 50% of participants were aged 16, indicating the movie opening would need to suit that age group. 10% did not enjoy thriller movies but preferred comedy and spy subgenres. The questionnaire aimed to understand preferred thriller movie types and components to incorporate into the group's work. Psychological thrillers were the most popular subgenre chosen by 40% of participants, followed by crime thrillers. Over 50% favored Batman movies and Inception, which both contain psychological thriller elements. When asked about preferred actors, 70% chose Christian Bale and Leonardo DiCaprio from those movies. Most participants also favored city settings over rural ones. Mystery, enigma, and suspense were seen as the most important thriller movie
The document summarizes audience research conducted for a psychopathic thriller film. Three individuals - a father, sister, and cousin - were asked questions about thriller films. When asked about psychopathic thrillers, the father described them as manipulative, sinister, and involving shocking twists. The sister said they are frightening and play with one's thoughts. The cousin associated them with serial killers, weaponry, and dangerous contraptions. Their favorite and least favorite genres also varied. When asked about a deranged husband and wife antagonist couple, the father found the idea eerie, the sister thought they could be deceiving, and the cousin said they could get away with things since no one would suspect them. Opinions
This document discusses hostage negotiation techniques. It explains that hostage takers typically want attention for themselves or a cause. The FBI teaches a behavioral change model using active listening, empathy, rapport building, and influence to resolve situations peacefully. However, untrained negotiators often fail to listen fully and try to convince the other side prematurely. The key is listening without judgment to understand the emotions and perspective of the hostage taker in order to de-escalate the situation.
Narration (new) power point presentationKaren Wright
The document discusses the purpose and structure of storytelling. It notes that stories can entertain, inform, instruct, or persuade an audience. The document provides tips for crafting narratives, such as selecting a topic and point, generating details to answer basic questions, arranging those details chronologically, and revising the story.
The document contains three sections analyzing demographic data related to thriller film viewership:
Gender: A pie chart shows that 58% of thriller film viewers are women, likely because women tend to go to the movies more often in groups or with boyfriends.
Age: A diagram shows that those aged 50 and above watch more thrillers at 26% than those aged 14-17 at 16%, possibly because older people have more free time than younger people busy with school or work.
Ethnicity: IMDB ratings data found that a thriller film called Se7en received a slightly higher average rating of 8.7/10 from 243,753 non-American viewers compared to 98,604 American viewers, suggesting
The document provides an overview of hostage negotiation techniques. It discusses the basic protocol for hostage negotiations, including isolating and containing the hostage taker, establishing communication, building rapport, considering demands, and preparing for surrender. It also outlines the hostage negotiation team, which typically includes a commander, negotiator, intelligence officer, communications officer, tactical team, and psychologist. Additionally, it explains how the principles of hostage negotiation can apply to business negotiations through a behavioral change stairway model involving active listening, empathy, rapport building, and influence to achieve behavioral change.
A survey was conducted to help inform the creation of a horror film trailer. The majority of respondents were female aged 17-18. Comedy and horror/thriller were the most popular film genres. Respondents expected blood, jump scares, gore, and a unique storyline from a horror trailer. They also expected intense, creepy, sinister, or dramatic music. This information will be used to structure the trailer to meet audience expectations of the horror genre.
This essay analyzes two film critics' interpretations of the movie Rashomon: Roger Ebert and Errol Morris. Ebert believes the movie portrays multiple subjective truths since witnesses have differing recollections of events. Morris argues there is one objective truth and the differing accounts are merely beliefs. The essay agrees with Morris, explaining his view fits better with philosophical theories of knowledge like Plato's justified true belief and ways of knowing. Using reasoning, perception, language and emotion, a viewer can determine the one objectively true account based on evidence rather than subjective beliefs.
This document provides tips for increasing home safety and preventing crimes like home invasion. It recommends being aware of your surroundings and any potential threats. Specific tips include making your home appear occupied when away using automatic timers, locking all doors and windows, installing an alarm system, keeping shrubbery trimmed, and avoiding giving personal information to strangers. The document stresses that while these tips can help, there is no guarantee of preventing all crimes.
This document provides tips for women's self protection. It discusses the importance of awareness of your surroundings and trusting your intuition. If confronted, the best option is to escape or fight back rather than going with the attacker. Pepper spray can be useful for self defense but does not always work and should not be relied on completely. Home invasions are a crime on the rise so it is important to have a safe room and not open the door for unknown people. When traveling, use door wedges and do not open the door for strangers. Staying safe also involves protecting personal information online.
FIRST DISCUSSION WRITTEN BY STUDENTThe simplest definition of c.docxvoversbyobersby
FIRST DISCUSSION WRITTEN BY STUDENT
"The simplest definition of crime is any act or behavior that violates the criminal law." (Robinson, 2013) This is one of the key ideas and points when it comes to crime. Too often we have our own opinions and thoughts of what is a crime. One thing might seem like a crime to one person but not to another. Well, the truth is, if there isn't a law being broken, then there is no crime being done. One type of crime that seems to plaguing tabloids and the news often is murder, and more so in the first degree. First degree murder is a crime that is premeditated and planned out. It may or not be something methodical, but has intent and is something that has been set out by the criminal that will get done. Some important types of factors that go into these types of crime vary, however there are some that are prevalent in all. One of the factors is childhood influences and environmental stigmas as a kid. Most murderers had a rough upbringing or encountered some experience early on that triggered the outlandish behavior. Another is personality order. Almost all murderers suffer from some kind of personality disorder, resulting from their adolescence stage in life. Lastly, would be a lack of support or an out. Someone or something to take their focus and attention from the evil in their minds. It is quite impossible to pinpoint exactly what would prevent an act of murder from begin committed, but there is hope. Everyone varies in personality and mental make up, but starting with childhood, some type of awareness program would help. This type of awareness would allow youth to recognize and be aware of the things that lead to criminal acts such as murder. In addition, I think its important that the parents get involved too, seeing as they are a hug influence and play a very large role int he development of their kid. To tie into the awareness part, a program aimed at identifying and helping individuals who show the traits of a notorious criminal would aid as well. Too many times I feel as though nothing gets said or done. It shows in the new as well, as many times the friends and family of a murder suspect often say that they never saw it coming. That these individuals were quiet, kept to themselves, were good students. News flash, those are signs of someone who is anti-social or perhaps ultimately a psychopath. Last, a good support system.program where one could go for help, completely unbiased and fearless of any kind of consequence. We are all too quick to judge sometimes, myself included, and so is society as a whole. As far as funding for programs as such, I think it would be difficult to back financially. Mostly because there are some programs out there that say or attempt to do these things, but fail. The fail because they have the wrong people in those positions or people who solely care about other things then those they are to help.
(PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON WHAT THEY WROTE USING PROPER ...
This document provides guidance on responding to an active shooter situation on campus. It defines an active shooter as an immediate threat causing death or serious injury. It instructs faculty and staff to secure the area, treat injuries, contact emergency services, and provide assailant details. Law enforcement will work to contain the threat before evacuating or treating injuries. The goal is to neutralize the assailant who will not stop until objectives are met. Historical perspectives on campus shooters are also presented.
The document discusses the benign violation theory of humor, which is that something is funny when it violates social norms or expectations in a way that seems harmless or acceptable. Two researchers, Peter McGraw and Caleb Warren, developed this theory to explain what makes things humorous. Humor arises from benign violations because realizing a threat is not actually harmful can transform a negative experience into a positive one through amusement.
This document provides information about the A.L.I.C.E. response strategy for responding to active shooter situations. It discusses how traditional lockdown approaches are insufficient on their own and limit options for survival. A.L.I.C.E. training teaches people to Alert others to danger, Lockdown if escape is not possible, counter aggressors if needed to survive, provide real-time Information updates, and Evacuate to safety if possible. The goal is to give people more options than passive hiding by teaching mental preparation, situational awareness, and how to take active measures like distraction and swarming attackers if necessary to survive until help arrives.
The document discusses lying and deception from several perspectives. It provides definitions of lying and notes that people typically lie one to two times per day, usually about feelings, preferences, and opinions. Philosophers like Plato, Augustine, and Kant generally held that lying is wrong, though Plato allowed for exceptions. The size of the neocortex correlates with deception rates in primates. Polygraphs measure stress, not deception directly, and their accuracy is limited.
The document summarizes the results of a survey about audience preferences for thriller films. It found that the majority of respondents were males under 30 years old who watch thrillers weekly. They preferred psychological thrillers over action thrillers and expected to see some violence. Knives and crowbars were the most preferred props for violent scenes. The data will help inform planning conventions for a thriller being developed, which seems aligned with audience expectations for the genre.
This document discusses media effects and violence, covering several areas of study on the topic. It examines empirical data which has both proved and disproved links between media violence and real-life aggression. Social psychology experiments like the Bobo doll experiments are mentioned. Neuropsychology research shows how viewing violent images activates threat-related brain areas. Quantitative data on violence in media is still important. The psychological effects discussed include potential increases in aggression, desensitization, and the "mean world syndrome." Two cases of real-life murders apparently inspired by the TV show Dexter are provided as examples of moral panics around media effects.
Social Judgment Theory (SJT) predicts the success of persuasion based on how close or far a message is from a person's existing beliefs. SJT includes three concepts: latitude of acceptance (ideas a person agrees with), latitude of rejection (ideas strongly disagreed with), and latitude of noncommitment (neutral ideas). To successfully persuade, the argument must fall within a person's latitude of acceptance. SJT also notes that people more invested in a topic have a narrower range of acceptance and are harder to persuade. Examples show how SJT predicts a person would evaluate arguments of different distances from their initial view on a topic.
The document discusses the results of a questionnaire conducted to gain insights into viewers' preferences for thriller movies. It finds that over 50% of participants are aged 16, so the movie opening would need to suit that age group. It also finds that psychological thrillers and crime thrillers are the most preferred subgenres, with Batman and Inception being the most popular movies from those subgenres. The results indicate that the movie should feature elements of mystery, enigma and suspense, and be set in a city environment.
This document defines conspiracy theories and discusses what makes for a justified conspiracy theory. It notes that to be justified, a conspiracy theory should have low reliance on eyewitness testimony and pass tests for a good explanation. A good explanation should be simple, falsifiable, and the hypothesis must be testable by determining what other observations would be expected if the explanation were correct rather than just because it is the only explanation available. Examples are provided of explanations that fail these tests.
Responding to Harassment: Moving Past Feminism 101Kassandra Perch
This document summarizes the typical cycle of reactions that occurs when someone reports harassment in the tech industry. It describes four main stages: 1) A marginalized person reports harassment and faces risks in doing so, 2) A group denies the report through tactics like demanding proof or character assassination, 3) Others claim to be shocked but do little to address the underlying issues, and 4) The victim is often left isolated with little support as attention moves elsewhere. The document urges moving past shock and denial to have real discussions acknowledging the systemic problems and supporting victims who come forward.
The questionnaire results showed that over 50% of participants were aged 16, indicating the movie opening would need to suit that age group. 10% did not enjoy thriller movies but preferred comedy and spy subgenres. The questionnaire aimed to understand preferred thriller movie types and components to incorporate into the group's work. Psychological thrillers were the most popular subgenre chosen by 40% of participants, followed by crime thrillers. Over 50% favored Batman movies and Inception, which both contain psychological thriller elements. When asked about preferred actors, 70% chose Christian Bale and Leonardo DiCaprio from those movies. Most participants also favored city settings over rural ones. Mystery, enigma, and suspense were seen as the most important thriller movie
The document summarizes audience research conducted for a psychopathic thriller film. Three individuals - a father, sister, and cousin - were asked questions about thriller films. When asked about psychopathic thrillers, the father described them as manipulative, sinister, and involving shocking twists. The sister said they are frightening and play with one's thoughts. The cousin associated them with serial killers, weaponry, and dangerous contraptions. Their favorite and least favorite genres also varied. When asked about a deranged husband and wife antagonist couple, the father found the idea eerie, the sister thought they could be deceiving, and the cousin said they could get away with things since no one would suspect them. Opinions
This document discusses hostage negotiation techniques. It explains that hostage takers typically want attention for themselves or a cause. The FBI teaches a behavioral change model using active listening, empathy, rapport building, and influence to resolve situations peacefully. However, untrained negotiators often fail to listen fully and try to convince the other side prematurely. The key is listening without judgment to understand the emotions and perspective of the hostage taker in order to de-escalate the situation.
Narration (new) power point presentationKaren Wright
The document discusses the purpose and structure of storytelling. It notes that stories can entertain, inform, instruct, or persuade an audience. The document provides tips for crafting narratives, such as selecting a topic and point, generating details to answer basic questions, arranging those details chronologically, and revising the story.
The document contains three sections analyzing demographic data related to thriller film viewership:
Gender: A pie chart shows that 58% of thriller film viewers are women, likely because women tend to go to the movies more often in groups or with boyfriends.
Age: A diagram shows that those aged 50 and above watch more thrillers at 26% than those aged 14-17 at 16%, possibly because older people have more free time than younger people busy with school or work.
Ethnicity: IMDB ratings data found that a thriller film called Se7en received a slightly higher average rating of 8.7/10 from 243,753 non-American viewers compared to 98,604 American viewers, suggesting
The document provides an overview of hostage negotiation techniques. It discusses the basic protocol for hostage negotiations, including isolating and containing the hostage taker, establishing communication, building rapport, considering demands, and preparing for surrender. It also outlines the hostage negotiation team, which typically includes a commander, negotiator, intelligence officer, communications officer, tactical team, and psychologist. Additionally, it explains how the principles of hostage negotiation can apply to business negotiations through a behavioral change stairway model involving active listening, empathy, rapport building, and influence to achieve behavioral change.
A survey was conducted to help inform the creation of a horror film trailer. The majority of respondents were female aged 17-18. Comedy and horror/thriller were the most popular film genres. Respondents expected blood, jump scares, gore, and a unique storyline from a horror trailer. They also expected intense, creepy, sinister, or dramatic music. This information will be used to structure the trailer to meet audience expectations of the horror genre.
This essay analyzes two film critics' interpretations of the movie Rashomon: Roger Ebert and Errol Morris. Ebert believes the movie portrays multiple subjective truths since witnesses have differing recollections of events. Morris argues there is one objective truth and the differing accounts are merely beliefs. The essay agrees with Morris, explaining his view fits better with philosophical theories of knowledge like Plato's justified true belief and ways of knowing. Using reasoning, perception, language and emotion, a viewer can determine the one objectively true account based on evidence rather than subjective beliefs.
This document provides tips for increasing home safety and preventing crimes like home invasion. It recommends being aware of your surroundings and any potential threats. Specific tips include making your home appear occupied when away using automatic timers, locking all doors and windows, installing an alarm system, keeping shrubbery trimmed, and avoiding giving personal information to strangers. The document stresses that while these tips can help, there is no guarantee of preventing all crimes.
This document provides tips for women's self protection. It discusses the importance of awareness of your surroundings and trusting your intuition. If confronted, the best option is to escape or fight back rather than going with the attacker. Pepper spray can be useful for self defense but does not always work and should not be relied on completely. Home invasions are a crime on the rise so it is important to have a safe room and not open the door for unknown people. When traveling, use door wedges and do not open the door for strangers. Staying safe also involves protecting personal information online.
FIRST DISCUSSION WRITTEN BY STUDENTThe simplest definition of c.docxvoversbyobersby
FIRST DISCUSSION WRITTEN BY STUDENT
"The simplest definition of crime is any act or behavior that violates the criminal law." (Robinson, 2013) This is one of the key ideas and points when it comes to crime. Too often we have our own opinions and thoughts of what is a crime. One thing might seem like a crime to one person but not to another. Well, the truth is, if there isn't a law being broken, then there is no crime being done. One type of crime that seems to plaguing tabloids and the news often is murder, and more so in the first degree. First degree murder is a crime that is premeditated and planned out. It may or not be something methodical, but has intent and is something that has been set out by the criminal that will get done. Some important types of factors that go into these types of crime vary, however there are some that are prevalent in all. One of the factors is childhood influences and environmental stigmas as a kid. Most murderers had a rough upbringing or encountered some experience early on that triggered the outlandish behavior. Another is personality order. Almost all murderers suffer from some kind of personality disorder, resulting from their adolescence stage in life. Lastly, would be a lack of support or an out. Someone or something to take their focus and attention from the evil in their minds. It is quite impossible to pinpoint exactly what would prevent an act of murder from begin committed, but there is hope. Everyone varies in personality and mental make up, but starting with childhood, some type of awareness program would help. This type of awareness would allow youth to recognize and be aware of the things that lead to criminal acts such as murder. In addition, I think its important that the parents get involved too, seeing as they are a hug influence and play a very large role int he development of their kid. To tie into the awareness part, a program aimed at identifying and helping individuals who show the traits of a notorious criminal would aid as well. Too many times I feel as though nothing gets said or done. It shows in the new as well, as many times the friends and family of a murder suspect often say that they never saw it coming. That these individuals were quiet, kept to themselves, were good students. News flash, those are signs of someone who is anti-social or perhaps ultimately a psychopath. Last, a good support system.program where one could go for help, completely unbiased and fearless of any kind of consequence. We are all too quick to judge sometimes, myself included, and so is society as a whole. As far as funding for programs as such, I think it would be difficult to back financially. Mostly because there are some programs out there that say or attempt to do these things, but fail. The fail because they have the wrong people in those positions or people who solely care about other things then those they are to help.
(PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON WHAT THEY WROTE USING PROPER ...
A2 - Aspectos Psicológicos - The Psychology of SecuritySpark Security
Security is both a feeling and a reality. And they’re not the same.This essay is my initial attempt to explore the feeling of security: where it comes from, how it works, and why it diverges from the reality of security.
This document provides information about law enforcement response to hostage and active shooter incidents at schools. It discusses the objectives of response, which is to resolve the critical incident safely and minimize injury. It describes the different types of incidents - barricaded suspects, active shooters, and hostage situations. It outlines the response procedures, which include setting up perimeters, making entry plans, gathering intelligence, and negotiating or making tactical entry if needed. It advises students and staff on safe behaviors if an incident occurs, such as securing rooms, evacuating if possible, or following officers' commands.
Man's free will distinguishes him from the rest of creation through his ability to reason, understand, and discern between good and evil. True freedom comes from following moral laws rather than one's desires, as desires can enslave us to sin. Living virtuously through obedience to moral truths leads to fulfillment and happiness. While love of God is the perfect motivator for moral living, fear of consequences can also motivate obedience. Christians believe God has established moral laws for our benefit that are written on our hearts through natural law.
Draw And Write Paper Printable - Discover The BeStacy Johnson
1. It helps us learn from their mistakes so we don't repeat the same errors. Knowing their past allows us to find better solutions.
2. Passing on this knowledge to future generations ensures cultural traditions continue and the family legacy lives on.
3. Understanding our family's history gives us context for their beliefs and allows us to choose whether to follow or improve upon their example. This shapes our own identity and example for others.
District Combatives Personal Protection Fundamentals [FINAL]Benjamin Drader
This document provides an overview of personal protection fundamentals, including situational awareness, threat identification, de-escalation, and self-defense techniques. It discusses establishing baselines of normal behavior and identifying anomalies to detect threats. Non-aggressive verbal de-escalation skills and postures are outlined to defuse threats if possible. As a last resort, targeting vulnerable areas like eyes and throat is recommended for self-defense. The document advocates viewing personal protection as concentric rings based on threat distance and training holistically across awareness, avoidance, de-escalation, and defense skills.
Man has free will that distinguishes him from creation and allows him to reason between good and evil. True freedom comes from following moral laws, which sets us free from slavery to sin. While living virtuously requires struggle, strength comes from prayer, Scripture, and sacraments like Reconciliation and the Eucharist. Moral acts proceed from deliberate choices between good and evil, expressing one's character. Responsibility for acts depends on knowledge, with invincible ignorance lessening culpability.
The document discusses the moral dilemmas presented in the movie Eye in the Sky. Military personnel have located terrorists but bombing their house would likely kill a young girl. Those involved debate whether to bomb to prevent potential suicide attacks or spare the girl's life. They represent different perspectives - compassion for the girl, duty to protect citizens, political optics. There is no clear answer, but involving diverse viewpoints helps reach the best solution while avoiding an "ugly truth" of acceptable collateral damage.
This document discusses the psychology of security and how people's feelings of security often diverge from the actual reality or probability of risks. It explores how human biases and the way the brain processes risks can cause irrational security behaviors and trade-offs. Four fields of research are examined that provide insights into this divergence - behavioral economics, psychology of decision making, psychology of risk perception, and neuroscience. Understanding where feelings of security come from and how they differ from reality is important for improving security practices and policies.
The document provides 7 tips for women's personal safety and security. It discusses the importance of personal awareness and listening to one's intuition. It also recommends taking self-defense training to learn simple techniques for simulated assaults. The document cautions women to be wary of bogus callers and 'date rape' drugs, and suggests everyday items that could be used defensively if needed. It stresses that if confronted, women should try to escape to a public place and attract attention rather than going with an attacker. Overall, the document offers advice to help women stay alert and protect themselves.
The document discusses why multiple witnesses at a crime scene may fail to help the victim. It summarizes research on the bystander effect, which found that people are less likely to help when others are present due to two factors: 1) pluralistic ignorance, where witnesses fail to recognize an emergency situation because others are not reacting; and 2) diffusion of responsibility, where each witness feels less personally responsible when others are also present. The research suggests that to increase the chances of help, witnesses should trust their own judgment of an emergency rather than assuming others know more, and victims should directly address individuals to make them feel fully responsible.
This document provides coping strategies for targets of organized stalking and electronic harassment. It suggests lowering expectations but maintaining hope, avoiding discrediting oneself, networking with other targets, prioritizing health, and accepting the situation while working to expand public awareness over time. Networking opportunities include email forums and conference calls. The document stresses the importance of sane communication to avoid appearing mentally ill and maintain credibility.
Lesson Eight Moral Development and Moral IntensityLesson Seve.docxsmile790243
Lesson Eight: Moral Development and Moral Intensity
Lesson Seven discussed the different codifications of moral precepts over the course of human history which have attempted to simplify moral prescriptions. Lesson Eight will introduce the various stages of moral development within individuals, as well as the way moral intensity is rationalized on a case-by-case basis.
Moral Development
As we have discussed in previous lessons, ethics rely on morality and a reasoned analysis of the factors that affect human well-being (Kohlberg & Hersh, 1977). However, at this juncture it is important to note that not all individuals are capable of the same level of moral reasoning. Some of the differences in reasoning ability are attributable to age; the more mature that one is, the more likely they are to reach the higher levels of moral development. However, adulthood is not a guarantee that an individual will achieve the most sophisticated levels of moral reasoning. Some will never get there, and this is a significant obstacle to any hope of universally accepted objective morality.
1. Preconventional Reasoning: The preconventional level of moral reasoning is the most primitive. At the preconventional level, choices are assessed based only on personal consequences. In other words, the actor makes choices that render rewards, and refrains from choices that render punishments (Graham, 1995). Preconventional reasoning is as much as non-human animal reasoning typically allows. Granted, it is not uncommon for some mammals to act self-sacrificially to preserve their offspring, and there have been reports of pets putting themselves in harm’s way to protect their human owners, but these are limited contexts. In almost every other situation, animals are driven first and foremost by self-preservation, and secondly, self-optimization. Preconventional reasoning is also the first strategy learned in the sequence of human development. Children typically think about their own consequences when deciding upon behavior. If doing chores is rewarded with an allowance, and coloring on the walls will result in grounding, children are likely to embrace the former and avoid the latter, all other things being equal. Although the vast majority of humans graduate from this level, it is important to note that many adults still regularly make choices that are based predominantly on preconventional reasoning. This is to say, selfish acts are frighteningly common.
2. Conventional Reasoning: The second level of moral reasoning is that of conventional reasoning. One step removed from pure selfishness, the conventional level of reasoning looks not simply to personal consequences (although this is still a factor), but also to social expectations in a societal context (Logsdon & Yuthas, 1997). Instances of conventional moral reasoning can be found almost anywhere one looks. For example, it is generally considered rude to cut other people in a line, so although one’s assessment of persona ...
Hackers and Harm Reduction / 29c3 / CCCviolet blue
Harm reduction methodology: An examination of hackers as an at-risk population (internal and external factors), ideas for applying harm reduction to reduce harmful consequences from hacking's inherent risks.
Thinking fast and slow by daniel kahnmanAkash Gupta
1. Experts develop intuition through recognition, where familiar cues in a new situation activate stored memories to provide an answer. However, expert predictions are often no better than chance.
2. Statistical thinking requires considering categories and groups, rather than individual cases, but people tend to apply causal reasoning inappropriately.
3. Anchoring effects, availability heuristic, and representativeness heuristic cause people to make judgments based on ease of recall or single features matching a prototype, rather than objective analysis.
This document provides an overview of active shooter training for library employees presented by Dr. Steve Albrecht. It discusses the need for such training given the "new" stressful environment libraries face with patrons experiencing mental illness and substance abuse issues. The training teaches employees to change their behavior under stress using concepts of "run, hide, fight" and emphasizes the importance of preparation and muscle memory during live threatening incidents. It provides guidance on assessing threatening behaviors, partnering with law enforcement, conducting drills, and addressing staff concerns in the aftermath of traumatic events.
This document discusses young people's perspectives on active citizenship. It finds that young people define active citizenship differently than adults, focusing more on concepts like making decisions, having rights, and caring for others. While institutions aim to promote active citizenship, young people face barriers like a lack of adult approval for their ideas and controls imposed on their behavior. The document argues we must understand behaviors from young people's perspectives and give them real opportunities to contribute to their communities.
This report explores the significance of border towns and spaces for strengthening responses to young people on the move. In particular it explores the linkages of young people to local service centres with the aim of further developing service, protection, and support strategies for migrant children in border areas across the region. The report is based on a small-scale fieldwork study in the border towns of Chipata and Katete in Zambia conducted in July 2023. Border towns and spaces provide a rich source of information about issues related to the informal or irregular movement of young people across borders, including smuggling and trafficking. They can help build a picture of the nature and scope of the type of movement young migrants undertake and also the forms of protection available to them. Border towns and spaces also provide a lens through which we can better understand the vulnerabilities of young people on the move and, critically, the strategies they use to navigate challenges and access support.
The findings in this report highlight some of the key factors shaping the experiences and vulnerabilities of young people on the move – particularly their proximity to border spaces and how this affects the risks that they face. The report describes strategies that young people on the move employ to remain below the radar of visibility to state and non-state actors due to fear of arrest, detention, and deportation while also trying to keep themselves safe and access support in border towns. These strategies of (in)visibility provide a way to protect themselves yet at the same time also heighten some of the risks young people face as their vulnerabilities are not always recognised by those who could offer support.
In this report we show that the realities and challenges of life and migration in this region and in Zambia need to be better understood for support to be strengthened and tuned to meet the specific needs of young people on the move. This includes understanding the role of state and non-state stakeholders, the impact of laws and policies and, critically, the experiences of the young people themselves. We provide recommendations for immediate action, recommendations for programming to support young people on the move in the two towns that would reduce risk for young people in this area, and recommendations for longer term policy advocacy.
The Antyodaya Saral Haryana Portal is a pioneering initiative by the Government of Haryana aimed at providing citizens with seamless access to a wide range of government services
Food safety, prepare for the unexpected - So what can be done in order to be ready to address food safety, food Consumers, food producers and manufacturers, food transporters, food businesses, food retailers can ...
Combined Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported (IUU) Vessel List.Christina Parmionova
The best available, up-to-date information on all fishing and related vessels that appear on the illegal, unregulated, and unreported (IUU) fishing vessel lists published by Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) and related organisations. The aim of the site is to improve the effectiveness of the original IUU lists as a tool for a wide variety of stakeholders to better understand and combat illegal fishing and broader fisheries crime.
To date, the following regional organisations maintain or share lists of vessels that have been found to carry out or support IUU fishing within their own or adjacent convention areas and/or species of competence:
Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR)
Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT)
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM)
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC)
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC)
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO)
North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC)
North Pacific Fisheries Commission (NPFC)
South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO)
South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO)
Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA)
Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)
The Combined IUU Fishing Vessel List merges all these sources into one list that provides a single reference point to identify whether a vessel is currently IUU listed. Vessels that have been IUU listed in the past and subsequently delisted (for example because of a change in ownership, or because the vessel is no longer in service) are also retained on the site, so that the site contains a full historic record of IUU listed fishing vessels.
Unlike the IUU lists published on individual RFMO websites, which may update vessel details infrequently or not at all, the Combined IUU Fishing Vessel List is kept up to date with the best available information regarding changes to vessel identity, flag state, ownership, location, and operations.
UN WOD 2024 will take us on a journey of discovery through the ocean's vastness, tapping into the wisdom and expertise of global policy-makers, scientists, managers, thought leaders, and artists to awaken new depths of understanding, compassion, collaboration and commitment for the ocean and all it sustains. The program will expand our perspectives and appreciation for our blue planet, build new foundations for our relationship to the ocean, and ignite a wave of action toward necessary change.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
karnataka housing board schemes . all schemesnarinav14
The Karnataka government, along with the central government’s Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY), offers various housing schemes to cater to the diverse needs of citizens across the state. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the major housing schemes available in the Karnataka housing board for both urban and rural areas in 2024.
RFP for Reno's Community Assistance CenterThis Is Reno
Property appraisals completed in May for downtown Reno’s Community Assistance and Triage Centers (CAC) reveal that repairing the buildings to bring them back into service would cost an estimated $10.1 million—nearly four times the amount previously reported by city staff.
1. Lesson One: Developing a Personal
and Home Protection Plan
Lesson One
Developing a
Personal and Home
Protection Plan
2. 1. The purpose of a personal and home protection plan.
2. Conflict avoidance and why it’s so important.
3. Situational awareness.
4. The color codes of awareness.
5. Observing our environments.
6. Concealed carry permits.
7. Home security and home defense.
8. Mental exercises.
Key Topics Covered in Lesson One
3. At its most basic level,
a personal and home
protection plan is
designed to help keep
us physically, legally,
financially, and morally
safe. Our ultimate goal
should be to avoid
violent encounters in
the first place by
developing an acute
awareness of our
surroundings, and by
making intelligent
decisions about our
actions, behavior and
precautions.
Why have a Personal & Home Protection Plan?
Movie 1.1 Protecting Ourselves Physically, Legally,
Financially, and Morally.
USCCA Chief Instructor Michael Martin, explains why a personal
and home protection plan can help us to avoid violent encounter in
the first place.
4. So why is avoidance or escape so important, if legally, we have the right to
defend ourselves from a violent attack? The answer is more than just the fact
that the only guaranteed method of surviving a violent encounter is to avoid it
in the first place.
It’s also because the law will place a special emphasis on our decisions and
actions leading up to any incident where we were in possession of a firearm,
and we’ll be expected to have “known better” if we could have avoided a
situation that turned violent.
The prosecuting attorney will want to know more than just, “Who was the
assailant?” and, “Who was the victim?” They’ll want to know what did you do
to avoid or instigate the fight?
Why is Conflict Avoidance So Important?
5. Movie 1.2 The Reasonable Person Test
Michael Martin explains the “reasonable person” test, and why
“reasonable person” doesn’t mean our friends, our family, or the
gang at our local shooting club.
In part, the prosecutor
will use what’s known
as a “reasonable
person test.” That
means that they’ll
weigh whether or not
they believe a
“reasonable person”
would have believed
the same things you
believed to be true,
and reacted the same
way you reacted.
Why is Conflict Avoidance So Important?
6. Is it Worth Dying Over or Going to Jail Over?
Because of the reasonable person test, a use of force on our part must carry
such seriousness attached to it, that it’s a fair question to ask, “Is this
situation worth going to jail over?” or, “Is this situation worth dying over?”
If the answer is yes, then we’ll need to be prepared to live with the results. If
the answer is no, then we’ll need to work hard to remove ourselves from the
situation (quickly!) before the only option remaining is a use of force.
Said another way, a use of force on our part should only be done as a last
resort, when we had no other choice, when the risk of death or jail time was
secondary in our minds, compared to the necessity of defending ourselves
from an unavoidable situation that we didn’t start, and we couldn’t escape
from.
Why is Conflict Avoidance So Important?
7. Three outcomes are
possible when it comes
to a violent attack:
Avoid, Escape or
Defend.
Each outcome has one
thing in common:
Seconds count.
Image 1.1 Seconds Count
If you identified this individual as a possible threat when he was
more than 100 feet away, you’d have a good chance of avoiding
any possible attack by moving quickly in the opposite direction. If
you didn’t notice him until he was 50 feet away, your best hope is
for a rapid escape. If you failed to notice him until he was within
21 feet and an attack commences, your options are down to
“defend,” and all bets are off on the outcome.
Seconds Count
8. Outcome Warning
Time
Possible Results
Avoid
1 Minute
or More
You’ll never know for the rest of your life whether or not you just avoided a
violent crime or whether you overreacted. Personally, we can live with that.
If you were right about the situation, you’ve just gotten a “Get out of jail for
free” card and possibly a “Get out of the hospital for free” card.
Your blood remains in your body where it belongs; your money remains in
your bank where it belongs; and you’ll remain at home with your family, where
you belong.
Escape
5 – 30+
Seconds
You’ve identified a dangerous situation in time to “exit stage left” before your
options are limited to “defend,” but you’re still in the middle of a bad situation.
Defend
3 – 5+
Seconds
While you still have plenty of options other than “shoot the bad guy,” you’ve
now crossed a significant line where every action you are about to take will
be second guessed by the police, the media, the prosecuting attorney, and
quite possibly, a grand jury and jury. On the other hand, if it was your only
choice, you do have a good chance of surviving.
Think about it this way—if you knew that the use of your firearm in self-
defense would result in your incarceration (that’s not a true legal test, but it is
a good litmus test) and would cost you tens of thousands of dollars in legal
expenses, how would that knowledge affect your decisions that lead up to
your use of force?
Seconds Count
9. Situational awareness is an awareness of our immediate vicinity, and of the
people and objects within that environment.
“Smart” phones and MP3 players can cause us to
focus our entire attention on a 3” circle in front of us,
making us oblivious to the rest of our Environment.
Even without the distraction of an electronic device,
too many people focus no farther than a circle of a
few feet in front of them when they’re in public.
Gaining Those Crucial Seconds
10. We need to think of our immediate vicinity as having a “bubble”
around it, and we need to be aware of everything and everyone
in that bubble.
Situational awareness is an awareness of our immediate vicinity, and of the
people and objects within that environment.
Gaining Those Crucial Seconds
11. Lieutenant Dennis Tueller of the Salt Lake City Police Department observed that with practice,
the average shooter could place two shots on target at a distance of 21 feet in about a second
and a half. He then ran another set of tests to determine exactly how quickly an “attacker”
could cover that same distance, and discovered that it could be done in that same 1.5
seconds. Based on Tueller’s experiment, most police departments in the U.S. now consider
anything within 32—50 feet to be within the “danger zone,” where an officer should be
prepared to issue commands, increase distance, or gain access to a firearm.
THE TUELLER DRILL
21
Feet
32—50
Feet
or
More
12. Making eye contact with any individual in our “protective
bubble” sends the simple message, “I see you.”
To avoid a potential threat, we may need to take minor
evasive action such as “stepping off the line,” speeding up,
or slowing down.
When we observe our surroundings in this manner, it will be
obvious to anyone watching us that we’re being observant,
and that fact alone will make us less attractive to potential
assailants. We can increase that “unattractiveness” by
walking with “purpose”—that is, we need to walk with our
bodies erect and our heads up, and we should walk faster
than the crowd, not slower.
“I See You”
This individual turns her head to observe anyone in her immediate area,
and quickly makes eye contact to inform the individual “I see you.”
Not Looking Like a Victim
13. Imagine two individuals walking down the street—the first individual is walking
with purpose, moving at a quick enough pace that she looks like she’s going
somewhere. That individual swivels her head to scan the area and she makes
quick eye contact with anyone in her immediate area. The second individual is
shuffling along at a slow pace, focused on a three-inch circle in front of him
while he sends a text message on his cell phone.
Which person do you think a criminal will want to target? When sizing up the
first individual, the criminal will realize, “She’s moving too fast and she saw
me. She won’t be easy to approach.” On the other hand, he’ll look at the
second individual and think, “I can get right up on him, and he’ll never see me
coming.”
Not Looking Like a Victim
14. Notice that we said
nothing about the size
or other characteristics
of the potential
“victims.” The truth is,
an observant 110 pound
woman is a less
attractive victim than a
200 pound man who is
entirely absorbed in his
cell phone and who is
completely unaware of
the attacker
approaching from
behind.
Image 1.2 Do You Look Like an Easy Victim?
Regardless of how tough you might look on the outside, all a
criminal will look for is whether or not you look like an easy victim.
Not Looking Like a Victim
15. Try to identify anyone else who might be carrying a firearm. It might be
a slight bulge on the hip of another permit holder, or it might be the outline of
a pistol grip under the shirt of a gang member, but that simple exercise
ensures that we at least look at everyone around us.
We watch hands, and we watch eyes, and pay extra close attention to
people approaching, or within our “danger zone.”
We also like to make a game of looking for individuals in “condition
white,” that is, we like to look at things from the criminal’s perspective.
Look for individuals who are talking on their cell phones or texting, and are
completely absorbed by that task (and completely unaware of their
surroundings). Watch for people who shuffle along slower than the crowd
around them, looking as if they’re going nowhere.
Finally, take the time to monitor yourself – how often do you find yourself
out in public, immersed in a cell phone call and oblivious to your
surroundings? How often do you discover that you’re tailgating the only
other vehicle on the freeway, when 2 – 3 other lanes are clear?
Making a “Game” of Situational Awareness
16. Originally developed by the U.S.
Marines in the Pacific during World War
II to help mentally condition Marines to
prepare for an attack, the Color Codes
were later modified by Colonel Jeff
Cooper for use in educating civilians to
help us to become more aware of our
surroundings, and to not only prepare
for violent encounters, but if possible, to
avoid them in the first place.
“My advice isn't for everyone. It's
primarily for legally armed citizens who
refuse to be victims.”
Colonel Jeff Cooper
The Color Codes of Awareness
17. Unaware
This individual is preoccupied with her
MP3 player, and is completely
unaware of her surroundings.
Condition White: Unaware
Unaware
In Condition White, you are unaware of what’s going on
around you:
You don’t think anything bad will happen and may
believe that violent crime happens to “other people.”
Modern technologies such as cell phones, smart
phones, and MP3 players create a perfect
environment to lull individuals into condition white.
Individuals in condition white often fail to recognize
emotions or aggressiveness in others and they might
enter into arguments without realizing that they’ve
moved beyond what’s safe, or they might believe that
they can talk their way out of trouble.
It’s the condition of most victims, and it’s the condition
that criminals look for.
You should never allow yourself to be in condition
white when armed, because our ability to avoid or
escape a dangerous situation is compromised – that
means that a defensive shooting might occur when it
could have been avoided!
Condition
White
18. Condition Yellow: Aware
Aware
In Condition Yellow, you are aware of your surroundings.
This is the condition you should be in any time you’re in
public.
You are aware of what’s happening in the immediate
vicinity, and you proceed with caution.
You are not paranoid or overreactive, but you keep an
eye out for potential threats and their sources.
Your posture, eyes, and demeanor say, “I am alert” and
you walk faster than the crowd.
You should become comfortable with simple habits such
as scanning an area (rooms, street corners, etc.) before
entering, and identifying exits and cover wherever you
are.
Individuals in condition yellow have developed safe
habits such as avoiding arguments, identifying everyone
and everything within their protective “bubble,” and
following the conflict avoidance ideas outlined in this
lesson.
If you are armed, you must be in yellow.
Aware
This individual is aware of her
surroundings, and is not distracting
herself with any electronic device or
other distraction. She not only
observes the area to her front, but she
also swivels her head to look to her
sides and directly behind her. She
makes momentary eye contact with
anyone within her “danger zone.”
Condition
Yellow
19. Condition Orange: Heightened
Awareness
Heightened Awareness
In Condition Orange, you have identified a possible
threat or threats. This is a heightened state of
awareness:
You realize that something may be wrong.
There may be a danger to yourself or others.
You make a plan on how to react, including
identifying cover, barriers, or an exit strategy.
You may begin to take preemptive action such as
turning around, changing direction, increasing
your distance, or making simple, direct verbal
commands such as “Stay back!” or “Don’t come
any closer!”
You decide on a mental “trigger” that will move
you to take action, such as an individual refusing
your verbal commands and moving closer into
your “bubble.”
You mentally prepare yourself for a confrontation
or a rapid escape.
Your pistol may remain holstered, but you should
prepare to access it.
Alarm
This individual has sensed or observed
something or someone that causes her
concern. She closely observes the
situation to determine the threat, and
makes a plan on how to react. Even if
the individual cannot be categorized as a
threat, she may decide to avoid the
situation entirely, and take evasive action
by walking, running, or driving away.
Condition
Orange
20. Action
In Condition Red, action is immediate:
Your mental trigger has been tripped and you execute
your plan, either to escape, take cover, or engage the
threat.
Trust your instincts—it’s better to run away from a
situation that turned out not to be a threat than it is to
get stuck in a mental block of, “This can’t be what I
think it is,” and guessing wrong.
Instinct and adrenaline will cause involuntary reactions
and must be calculated into your training program.
You should expect your hands to tremble and your fine
motor skills to degrade.
If engaging the threat, operate within the rules
governing the use of force, including the obligation to
retreat if possible, and the obligation to use something
less than deadly force if it will suffice.
A use of force is not the required outcome. If you’ve
closely observed the immediate area and have
identified an escape route, retreat may be the most
logical and prudent course of action.
Action: Escape
In this example, the
individual has
identified a threat
early enough to make
a rapid escape or to
head toward cover.
Action: Draw
Firearm and Issue
Commands
In this example, the
individual forcefully
issues commands
with her firearm at a
lower ready position
(and the finger outside
the trigger guard).
Action: Engage the
Threat
In this example, the
individual points her
firearm at the attacker
and is ready to take
whatever action is
required to stop the
threat.
Condition Red: Action
Condition
Red
21.
22.
23.
24. Blind Spots
When approaching blind spots at the corners of buildings or when approaching
trees, tall bushes, concrete pillars, or vehicles, give them a wide berth.
Turn to observe the hidden area as you approach.
Get ready to run!
Areas to Avoid
25. Low Light Areas
Plan routes through well-lit areas rather than routes with little or no light.
Areas to Avoid
26. Away from the Crowds
Criminals count on an easy
escape with no witnesses!
Sticking with the crowds is one
of your best methods of
avoiding violent crime.
Regardless of how convenient
a shortcut might seem, or
however safe you might feel
heading to your car late at night
all alone, that’s the kind of
behavior that criminals count on
to find easy victims.
Areas to Avoid
27. Barriers are any object that you can place between yourself and an attacker.
Concealment is anything that hides you from the threat such as a closed door,
a wall, or anything you can duck behind.
Cover protects you from incoming bullets. Cover would include things like
concrete pillars, or the front of vehicles where the engine block is.
Cover
Behind engine blocks
and concrete pillars.
Escape Routes
Back to mall or out of
garage.
Areas to Avoid
Where lights are
burned out, and where
crowds are lacking.
Barriers, Cover and Concealment
28. Identify Escape Routes and opportunities to increase distance between you
and a threat (walking, running, or driving away) or to reach cover or
concealment.
An Exit Strategy
Cover
Behind engine blocks
and concrete pillars.
Escape Routes
Back to mall or out of
garage.
Areas to Avoid
Where lights are
burned out, and where
crowds are lacking.
31. A permit to carry is
not an invincibility
shield, or a junior
police officer
badge, or a “Fix”
for bad behavior.
It’s a permit to
carry a firearm.
That’s all it is. It
provides a right to
carry an object that
might otherwise be
illegal to carry, but it
affords us no special
rights, and instead, it
places additional
limits on our actions
and behavior.
How a Permit to Carry Fits
Movie 1.3 Where a Concealed Carry Permit Fits
Michael Martin explains what a concealed carry permit is good for,
and as importantly, what a concealed carry permit is not.
32. Students of self-
defense can spend
hours or days
studying and training
on methods of
staying safe in public,
including perfecting
the skills of
situational awareness
and the use of a
handgun in self-
defense. Yet those
same individuals can
exhibit sloppy and
unsafe behavior
when it comes to
securing the one
place where we
should feel safe.
Movie 1.4 Breaking and Entry Made Simple
Standard glass in your windows and no burglar alarm? You might
as well put your stuff in the front yard with a “free” sign on it.
Home Security
33. One reason for this disparity may simply be that when we’re in our homes
it becomes easy to slip back into “condition white” and to believe that
nothing bad can occur.
Another reason may be that it’s more difficult to quantify the dangers of a
home invasion when compared to the risks of other crimes of violence.
While the FBI maintains detailed crime data in their Uniform Crime Report
(the source for most media reports on violent crime) including the crime of
burglary, they do not differentiate between burglaries that occur in empty
homes versus occupied homes. If a violent crime occurred during a home
invasion, the FBI would categorize the crime under two headings such as
burglary and rape, but with no separate category of “home invasion,” it’s
impossible to determine, nationally or locally, just how common these “hot
burglaries” are using the FBI data alone.
Suffice to say, taking personal responsibility for our own safety, and the
safety of our families, cannot stop at the front door.
Home Security
34. Home Security
According to FBI statistics,
burglars enter the front door of
homes 34% of the time, and
back or screen doors 22% of
the time. The most common
method of breaching the
door? A good, swift kick.
Adding a reinforced strikeplate
and securing it with three-inch
screws (which will mount in
the wall studs rather than just
the door frame) can increase
the force required to breach
the door by more than 10-
times.
36. Home Security
FBI statistics also show that
first floor windows are the next
favored entry point at about
23%.
By adding a bar stop ($20)
and a plastic window
treatment ($6.50 per square
foot) to the standard hung
window; or reinforced hinges
to the casement window, the
time to breach the window will
be increased dramatically.
37. When evaluating the security of your
home, we suggest putting yourself in
the mind of the criminal who wants to
gain access to your home, and conduct
a thorough inspection, inside and out.
You should start from the outside of the
home and make a methodical, 360-
degree inspection starting from the
ground up. During your inspection,
you’ll need to ask yourself the types of
questions we’ve posed on the checklist
to the right.
Interactive 1.1 Home Security Inspection
Checklist
Tap or click the checklist above, to see how well
you do on your own home inspection.
Evaluating Your Home’s Security
38. The first step in effectively
using a burglar alarm, is to get
the alarm. The second step is
to set it, religiously.
Insurance company surveys
have shown that 60%—81% of
people who have burglar
alarms fail to set them when at
home, or even when on
vacation.
The number one excuse (53%)
for failing to set the alarm is
because the homeowner leaves
pets indoors, however, alarm
manufacturers now offer “pet
immune” motion detectors.
Homes that have alarms are
three times less likely to be
burglarized
Home Alarms
40. If all of our security measures fail,
and we still find ourselves in the
middle of a home invasion, we must
have a plan.
When discussing a home invasion
plan with the family, we’d suggest
reviewing the checklist to the right,
and ensuring that all family members
are aware of how to dial 911, and all
age-appropriate family members are
aware of the location of the home
defense firearm and how to use it.
Plan a route for all family members
to head to the most secure areas of
the home, and include in the plan
who will get the phone and dial 911,
who will access the defensive
firearm, and who will assist loved
ones.
Home Defense
Interactive 1.2 Home Defense Planning
While you don’t necessarily need to draw out a
floor plan as part of your home defense planning,
you at least need to have a plan.
41. Mental exercises help us bridge
the gap between the training
that we do on the range, and the
type of scenario we might find
ourselves in if a critical incident
occurs.
Mental exercises can be done
on the range, or while sitting in
an easy chair at home.
Mental Exercises
42. When running mental exercises
at home or at the range, you’ll
need to create hypothetical
problems that require a solution,
such as our examples on the
widget on this page.
Your solution will need to be a
complete solution including the
items in the checklist also on the
widget.
Interactive 1.3 Mental Exercise Checklist
Mental exercises can be run while relaxing in an
easy chair at home, or while conducting live fire at
the range. When developing solutions to a variety
of scenarios, you’ll need to develop complete
solutions, including answers to the checklist items
above.
Mental Exercises
44. 1. The purpose of a personal and home protection plan.
2. Conflict avoidance and why it’s so important.
3. Situational awareness.
4. The color codes of awareness.
5. Observing our environments.
6. Concealed carry permits.
7. Home security and home defense.
8. Mental exercises.
Key Topics Covered in Lesson One
Poll Title: Do not modify the notes in this section to avoid tampering with the Poll Everywhere activity.
More info at polleverywhere.com/support
From the options below, select the choices you might have if you find yourself in condition red. More than one answer may apply.
https://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/L8Qjb5nALOJ0oqsBbaIO3?flow=Default&onscreen=persist
Poll Title: Do not modify the notes in this section to avoid tampering with the Poll Everywhere activity.
More info at polleverywhere.com/support
True or false. When in public, you should at least be in condition yellow.
https://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/YT50zDFC6M0UDbdKK2RGB?flow=Default&onscreen=persist
Poll Title: Do not modify the notes in this section to avoid tampering with the Poll Everywhere activity.
More info at polleverywhere.com/support
From the options below, which condition demonstrates condition white?
https://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/WfQ61R8Bl4Ly9viIJ4yO2?flow=Default&onscreen=persist
Poll Title: Do not modify the notes in this section to avoid tampering with the Poll Everywhere activity.
More info at polleverywhere.com/support
Your car is parked at the end of a dark alley. What should you do?
https://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/nRMq6mAFIfOuuUTn5KKBP?flow=Default&onscreen=persist
Poll Title: Do not modify the notes in this section to avoid tampering with the Poll Everywhere activity.
More info at polleverywhere.com/support
When in public, you should be aware of things that can work to your advantage if you are ever attacked. These things include:
https://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/pRGaxfiqkHs2ptEAXjwVp?flow=Default&onscreen=persist
Poll Title: Do not modify the notes in this section to avoid tampering with the Poll Everywhere activity.
More info at polleverywhere.com/support
According to the FBI, what is the most common entry point for burglars?
https://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/gin8K5G3ohNdgoYy1xcnP?flow=Default&onscreen=persist
Poll Title: Do not modify the notes in this section to avoid tampering with the Poll Everywhere activity.
More info at polleverywhere.com/support
What is the number one reason people give for failing to set their burglar alarm?
https://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/I7LWAbvsdRRucKxx2JaBE?flow=Default&onscreen=persist
Poll Title: Do not modify the notes in this section to avoid tampering with the Poll Everywhere activity.
More info at polleverywhere.com/support
True or false. Mental exercises can only be conducted at the range.
https://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/RHvEx1ZKzkNmf3ZEpRRET?flow=Default&onscreen=persist