Executive compensation continues its movement towards performance pay as the standard. Compensation structures and proxy disclosures are more and more complex. Investors and proxy advisors continue to increase influence on compensation issues. This webinar examines executive compensation, including equity-based compensation plans and executive employment and severance agreements. The importance of disclosure, alignment of risk, and metrics is also examined. Practical guidance on pay-for-performance and supplemental pay definitions is provided. The panelists discuss the effect of the Dodd-Frank Act on executive compensation, including SEC regulations. Exchange rules are compared to applicable federal law. Best practices regarding executive compensation committees and regulatory requirements for those committees are examined. Shareholder advisory groups promulgate executive compensation related advisory policies for their institutional shareholder clients annually and these policies are also discussed. Issues regarding board composition and leadership structure issues are discussed in relation to executive compensation.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/executive-compensation-2021/
From the point of choosing the appropriate business structure to the scope and extent of necessary contracts, there are numerous legal issues to address when starting a company. While certain legal issues may even bring a start-up to a grinding halt if neglected, there are many others that are possible to be handled with ease, provided you have the right information to make timely decisions. Given their importance across sectors, the following issues and details will be covered in “Legal For Startups”.
• Legal Aspects for Starting Up:
• Contractual safeguards:
• Employees and workplace regulations:
• Data Protection
Presentation given to the participants of the Launchpad program run by NDRC in Dublin's Digital Hub, including updated links to NVCA term sheet and guidance on retaining professional advisers
Current Trends in Leveraged Finance (Series: Leveraged Finance)Financial Poise
This webinar discusses some of the latest trends and developments in leveraged finance terms and practices and the extent to which some of these have gained market acceptance.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/current-trends-in-leveraged-finance-2021/
At our first public sector breakfast club of the New Year, we covered the following topics:
Collaboration / joint ventures - an overview of some key considerations including:
• formation: contractual or corporate? Choice of vehicle
• management: risk sharing, degree of integration and limitation of liability
• exit.
Overage clauses, including:
• common issues
• protection available.
https://www.brownejacobson.com/sectors-and-services/sectors/public-sector
The Very Basics: Forming the Business (Series: The Start-Up/Forming the Busin...Financial Poise
So, you are an entrepreneur and want to start your own business (or you are an attorney, accountant, or other professional advisor working with one). One of the first decisions required is to choose a legal structure for the business and the jurisdiction of entity organization. What factors should be taken into consideration prior to selecting a legal structure and jurisdiction? Does a sole proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company or corporation (C- or S-corp) make the most sense? This webinar focuses on business formation and the pros and cons to the different legal structures, and includes tips on how to keep one’s personal assets safe from the claims of future creditors of the business.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/the-very-basics-forming-the-business-2021/
US/ Canada cross-border tax planning could be impacted by the recent finalization of Section 385 regulations by the IRS and Treasury Department. Because most of these new rules apply with an effective date reaching back to April 5, 2016, it is imperative that Canadian companies with U.S. activities assess their potential impact and develop a strategy for managing their exposure to these rules.
Executive compensation continues its movement towards performance pay as the standard. Compensation structures and proxy disclosures are more and more complex. Investors and proxy advisors continue to increase influence on compensation issues. This webinar examines executive compensation, including equity-based compensation plans and executive employment and severance agreements. The importance of disclosure, alignment of risk, and metrics is also examined. Practical guidance on pay-for-performance and supplemental pay definitions is provided. The panelists discuss the effect of the Dodd-Frank Act on executive compensation, including SEC regulations. Exchange rules are compared to applicable federal law. Best practices regarding executive compensation committees and regulatory requirements for those committees are examined. Shareholder advisory groups promulgate executive compensation related advisory policies for their institutional shareholder clients annually and these policies are also discussed. Issues regarding board composition and leadership structure issues are discussed in relation to executive compensation.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/executive-compensation-2021/
From the point of choosing the appropriate business structure to the scope and extent of necessary contracts, there are numerous legal issues to address when starting a company. While certain legal issues may even bring a start-up to a grinding halt if neglected, there are many others that are possible to be handled with ease, provided you have the right information to make timely decisions. Given their importance across sectors, the following issues and details will be covered in “Legal For Startups”.
• Legal Aspects for Starting Up:
• Contractual safeguards:
• Employees and workplace regulations:
• Data Protection
Presentation given to the participants of the Launchpad program run by NDRC in Dublin's Digital Hub, including updated links to NVCA term sheet and guidance on retaining professional advisers
Current Trends in Leveraged Finance (Series: Leveraged Finance)Financial Poise
This webinar discusses some of the latest trends and developments in leveraged finance terms and practices and the extent to which some of these have gained market acceptance.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/current-trends-in-leveraged-finance-2021/
At our first public sector breakfast club of the New Year, we covered the following topics:
Collaboration / joint ventures - an overview of some key considerations including:
• formation: contractual or corporate? Choice of vehicle
• management: risk sharing, degree of integration and limitation of liability
• exit.
Overage clauses, including:
• common issues
• protection available.
https://www.brownejacobson.com/sectors-and-services/sectors/public-sector
The Very Basics: Forming the Business (Series: The Start-Up/Forming the Busin...Financial Poise
So, you are an entrepreneur and want to start your own business (or you are an attorney, accountant, or other professional advisor working with one). One of the first decisions required is to choose a legal structure for the business and the jurisdiction of entity organization. What factors should be taken into consideration prior to selecting a legal structure and jurisdiction? Does a sole proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company or corporation (C- or S-corp) make the most sense? This webinar focuses on business formation and the pros and cons to the different legal structures, and includes tips on how to keep one’s personal assets safe from the claims of future creditors of the business.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/the-very-basics-forming-the-business-2021/
US/ Canada cross-border tax planning could be impacted by the recent finalization of Section 385 regulations by the IRS and Treasury Department. Because most of these new rules apply with an effective date reaching back to April 5, 2016, it is imperative that Canadian companies with U.S. activities assess their potential impact and develop a strategy for managing their exposure to these rules.
The deal is complete, and the parties have finished the hard work. Or have they? Integration planning turns to execution as people, process, and technology are combined once the deal is legally closed. The buyer will need to consider the purchased business or assets from the standpoint of employees, IT, customers, suppliers, and a multitude of other areas. In addition, numerous post-closing legal issues may arise, including purchase price adjustments, breaches of representations and warranties, enforcement of key negative employment-related covenants and restrictive covenants, collection of pre-closing accounts receivable, and true-ups of final financials. This episode guides listeners through the process, timing, and issues which most commonly arise after the closing of deals.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/post-closing-issues-integration-potential-buyer-seller-disputes-2021/
India offers risk and reward. IndusLaw partner, Gaurav Dani and Saurav Kumar spoke on some of the key issues to think about in the context of an equity investment and the pitfalls to be aware of in structuring joint ventures in Tokyo earlier in April
The fourth webinar presentation in the M&A Litigation Series examines claims and other rights of action asserted by stockholders in connection with M&A transactions. Various types of claims and proceedings – ranging from fiduciary duty to federal securities to statutory appraisal – are discussed. Director and Officer indemnity and advancement obligations likewise are addressed.
On our agenda:
-Fiduciary Duty and Disclosure Claims
-Federal Securities Claims
-Statutory Appraisal
-Books and Records Inspection Rights
-D&O Insurance and Indemnity and Advancement Obligations
What Every Founder/Entrepeneur Must Know (Series: The Start-Up/Small Business...Financial Poise
Congratulations. You are a founder of a company and you have just been given an hour to ask several experts anything you want about the subject. Some questions will certainly focus on IP, since intellectual property is so important to so many businesses. Some questions will touch on outsourcing- perhaps of manufacturing, perhaps of certain other functions. Formation, capital raising, and HR are also fair game. And since the panel includes two attorneys, you can be sure that the conversation will cover both the business and legal aspects of the various topics discussed. The panel will also discuss planning for incremental growth; and, while pandemic continues, the availability of PPP loans and governmental assistance.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to:https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/what-every-founder-entrepreneur-must-know-2021/
Partner Julie Murphy-O'Connor, Partner Brendan Colgan and Senior Associate Gearóid Carey of the Corporate Restructuring and Insolvency Group co-author an article for Lexology Navigator - Restructuring and Insolvency in Ireland.
Highlighting the legal issues pertaining to start-ups and business. Ranging from choice of entity, contracts, IPR issues, compliance, licenses, funding.
Revitalizing Rule 14a-8's ordinary business exclusion for shareholder proposalsStephen Bainbridge
Who decides what products a company should sell, what prices it should charge, and so on? Is it the board of directors, the top management team, or the shareholders? In large corporations, of course, the answer is the top management team operating under the supervision of the board. As for the shareholders, they traditionally have had no role in these sort of operational decisions. In recent years, however, shareholders have increasingly used SEC Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 (the so-called shareholder proposal rule), to not just manage but even micromanage corporate decisions.
The rule permits a qualifying shareholder of a public corporation registered with the SEC to force the company to include a resolution and supporting statement in the company’s proxy materials for its annual meeting. In theory, Rule 14a-8 contains limits on shareholder micro-management. The rule permits management to exclude proposals on a number of both technical and substantive bases, of which the exclusion in Rule 14a-8(i)(7) of proposals relating to ordinary business operations is the most pertinent for present purposes. Rule 14a-8(i)(7) is intended to permit exclusion of a proposal that “seeks to ‘micro-manage’ the company by probing too deeply into matters of a complex nature upon which shareholders, as a group, would not be in a position to make an informed judgment.”
Unfortunately, court decisions have largely eviscerated the ordinary business operations exclusion. Corporate decisions involving “matters which have significant policy, economic or other implications inherent in them” may not be excluded as ordinary business matters, for example, which creates a gap through which countless proposals have made it onto corporate proxy statements.
Shareholder Activism in the United States: Managing Shareholder InterventionsStephen Bainbridge
This is a presentation I gave at the University of Auckland Faculty of Law on May 19, 2014. It is based on my paper Preserving Director Primacy by Managing Shareholder Interventions (August 27, 2013), which is available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2298415.
Even though the primacy of the board of director primacy is deeply embedded in state corporate law, shareholder activism nevertheless has become an increasingly important feature of corporate governance in the United States. The financial crisis of 2008 and the ascendancy of the Democratic Party in Washington created an environment in which activists were able to considerably advance their agenda via the political process. At the same time, changes in managerial compensation, shareholder concentration, and board composition, outlook, and ideology, have also empowered activist shareholders.
There are strong normative arguments for disempowering shareholders and, accordingly, for rolling back the gains shareholder activists have made. Whether that will prove possible in the long run or not, however, in the near term attention must be paid to the problem of managing shareholder interventions.
This problem arises because not all shareholder interventions are created equally. Some are legitimately designed to improve corporate efficiency and performance, especially by holding poorly performing boards of directors and top management teams to account. But others are motivated by an activist’s belief that he or she has better ideas about how to run the company than the incumbents, which may be true sometimes but often seems dubious. Worse yet, some interventions are intended to advance an activist’s agenda that is not shared by other investors.
This paper proposes managing shareholder interventions through changes to the federal proxy rules designed to make it more difficult for activists to effect operational changes, while encouraging shareholder efforts to hold directors and managers accountable.
Choosing the appropriate legal structure is a crucial decision for any startup.What are the basic forms of doing business and their relative benefits? Essential procedures and prerequisites of each form of business.
Contractual safeguards: How do we limit contractual liability? Relevant stakeholders (promoters/co-founders; employees; consultants; clients and vendors) and the respective contract liability mitigating strategies.
Data Protection: How do we protect the competitive value of data in our business? Data protection is distinct from IPRs, and therefore, we must understand the legal framework of protecting data and the relevant international trends in this regard.
The deal is complete, and the parties have finished the hard work. Or have they? Integration planning turns to execution as people, process, and technology are combined once the deal is legally closed. The buyer will need to consider the purchased business or assets from the standpoint of employees, IT, customers, suppliers, and a multitude of other areas. In addition, numerous post-closing legal issues may arise, including purchase price adjustments, breaches of representations and warranties, enforcement of key negative employment-related covenants and restrictive covenants, collection of pre-closing accounts receivable, and true-ups of final financials. This episode guides listeners through the process, timing, and issues which most commonly arise after the closing of deals.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/post-closing-issues-integration-potential-buyer-seller-disputes-2021/
India offers risk and reward. IndusLaw partner, Gaurav Dani and Saurav Kumar spoke on some of the key issues to think about in the context of an equity investment and the pitfalls to be aware of in structuring joint ventures in Tokyo earlier in April
The fourth webinar presentation in the M&A Litigation Series examines claims and other rights of action asserted by stockholders in connection with M&A transactions. Various types of claims and proceedings – ranging from fiduciary duty to federal securities to statutory appraisal – are discussed. Director and Officer indemnity and advancement obligations likewise are addressed.
On our agenda:
-Fiduciary Duty and Disclosure Claims
-Federal Securities Claims
-Statutory Appraisal
-Books and Records Inspection Rights
-D&O Insurance and Indemnity and Advancement Obligations
What Every Founder/Entrepeneur Must Know (Series: The Start-Up/Small Business...Financial Poise
Congratulations. You are a founder of a company and you have just been given an hour to ask several experts anything you want about the subject. Some questions will certainly focus on IP, since intellectual property is so important to so many businesses. Some questions will touch on outsourcing- perhaps of manufacturing, perhaps of certain other functions. Formation, capital raising, and HR are also fair game. And since the panel includes two attorneys, you can be sure that the conversation will cover both the business and legal aspects of the various topics discussed. The panel will also discuss planning for incremental growth; and, while pandemic continues, the availability of PPP loans and governmental assistance.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to:https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/what-every-founder-entrepreneur-must-know-2021/
Partner Julie Murphy-O'Connor, Partner Brendan Colgan and Senior Associate Gearóid Carey of the Corporate Restructuring and Insolvency Group co-author an article for Lexology Navigator - Restructuring and Insolvency in Ireland.
Highlighting the legal issues pertaining to start-ups and business. Ranging from choice of entity, contracts, IPR issues, compliance, licenses, funding.
Revitalizing Rule 14a-8's ordinary business exclusion for shareholder proposalsStephen Bainbridge
Who decides what products a company should sell, what prices it should charge, and so on? Is it the board of directors, the top management team, or the shareholders? In large corporations, of course, the answer is the top management team operating under the supervision of the board. As for the shareholders, they traditionally have had no role in these sort of operational decisions. In recent years, however, shareholders have increasingly used SEC Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 (the so-called shareholder proposal rule), to not just manage but even micromanage corporate decisions.
The rule permits a qualifying shareholder of a public corporation registered with the SEC to force the company to include a resolution and supporting statement in the company’s proxy materials for its annual meeting. In theory, Rule 14a-8 contains limits on shareholder micro-management. The rule permits management to exclude proposals on a number of both technical and substantive bases, of which the exclusion in Rule 14a-8(i)(7) of proposals relating to ordinary business operations is the most pertinent for present purposes. Rule 14a-8(i)(7) is intended to permit exclusion of a proposal that “seeks to ‘micro-manage’ the company by probing too deeply into matters of a complex nature upon which shareholders, as a group, would not be in a position to make an informed judgment.”
Unfortunately, court decisions have largely eviscerated the ordinary business operations exclusion. Corporate decisions involving “matters which have significant policy, economic or other implications inherent in them” may not be excluded as ordinary business matters, for example, which creates a gap through which countless proposals have made it onto corporate proxy statements.
Shareholder Activism in the United States: Managing Shareholder InterventionsStephen Bainbridge
This is a presentation I gave at the University of Auckland Faculty of Law on May 19, 2014. It is based on my paper Preserving Director Primacy by Managing Shareholder Interventions (August 27, 2013), which is available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2298415.
Even though the primacy of the board of director primacy is deeply embedded in state corporate law, shareholder activism nevertheless has become an increasingly important feature of corporate governance in the United States. The financial crisis of 2008 and the ascendancy of the Democratic Party in Washington created an environment in which activists were able to considerably advance their agenda via the political process. At the same time, changes in managerial compensation, shareholder concentration, and board composition, outlook, and ideology, have also empowered activist shareholders.
There are strong normative arguments for disempowering shareholders and, accordingly, for rolling back the gains shareholder activists have made. Whether that will prove possible in the long run or not, however, in the near term attention must be paid to the problem of managing shareholder interventions.
This problem arises because not all shareholder interventions are created equally. Some are legitimately designed to improve corporate efficiency and performance, especially by holding poorly performing boards of directors and top management teams to account. But others are motivated by an activist’s belief that he or she has better ideas about how to run the company than the incumbents, which may be true sometimes but often seems dubious. Worse yet, some interventions are intended to advance an activist’s agenda that is not shared by other investors.
This paper proposes managing shareholder interventions through changes to the federal proxy rules designed to make it more difficult for activists to effect operational changes, while encouraging shareholder efforts to hold directors and managers accountable.
Choosing the appropriate legal structure is a crucial decision for any startup.What are the basic forms of doing business and their relative benefits? Essential procedures and prerequisites of each form of business.
Contractual safeguards: How do we limit contractual liability? Relevant stakeholders (promoters/co-founders; employees; consultants; clients and vendors) and the respective contract liability mitigating strategies.
Data Protection: How do we protect the competitive value of data in our business? Data protection is distinct from IPRs, and therefore, we must understand the legal framework of protecting data and the relevant international trends in this regard.
Mergers_ Tool to Survive the Second Wave of Covid19 3.pdfmyLawyerAdvise
One of the main objectives of an entity is GOING CONCERN. Many business organisations shut down as a result of covid due to lack of resources in operating their routine transactions. The most suitable solution for small scale businesses post covid is merger. Mergers will lead to expansion of resources, retention of employment, fund rotation, adequate balance of demand and supply etc. As the firms emerge from the pandemic, mergers would be the best way to come out of the financial stress for small businesses. It will help leaders gain economies of scale or at least the potential to run more efficiently. Once the economy recovers and accelerates out of recession, the small businesses can take advantage of the environment to execute its strategic acquisition agenda and to position the business to exceed industry-average growth. Mergers are a great way to lock down your business and create job opportunities, allowing customers to access your products and services. It will be a mutually beneficial situation
How to Move Your Startup Company to the U.S.ideatoipo
Recorded 6/20/23
Moving an international company to the U.S. can be a challenging process with many pitfalls.
This video is designed to help tech startups understand some of the legal decisions that need to be taken into consideration when expanding your company to the U.S.
The speakers discuss:
1. Why many startup founders want to bring their company to the U.S.
2. When is a good time to start the process?
3. What is an appropriate legal structure for U.S. operations or funding in the U.S.?
4. What are the typical rounds of raising capital in the U.S.?
5. What are the most common mistakes founders make during the early stages of their startup (taxation, IP, immigration, insurance, compliance)?
About the Speakers:
Svetlana Kamyshanskaya, the founder of Primum Law Group, is a global citizen with the legal, operational, and project management expertise to chart a successful course for expanding inbound tech companies and startups. Svetlana works with entrepreneurs and executives at all stages of development. She has personalized her clients’ road maps for bringing their business to the U.S.
Elina Firsava is a corporate attorney at Primum Law Group where her practice focuses on helping international and domestic companies to incorporate and develop their business in the United States. She assists startups with their general corporate matters, including entity formation and reorganization.
How to Move Your Startup Company to the U.S.ideatoipo
Presented August 23, 2023
Moving an international company to the U.S. can be a challenging process with many pitfalls.
This webinar is designed to help tech startups understand some of the legal decisions that need to be taken into consideration when expanding your company to the U.S.
The speakers will discuss:
1. Why many startup founders want to bring their company to the U.S.
2. When it is a good time to start the process?
3. What is an appropriate legal structure for U.S. operations or funding in the U.S.?
4. What are the typical rounds of raising capital in the U.S.?
5. What are the most common mistakes founders make during the early stages of their startup (taxation, IP, immigration, insurances, compliances)?
An organization which is diligence ready, will be adhering to all the corporate Secretarial & Corporate governance norms thereby meeting the expectations of all stakeholders.
The deal is complete, and the parties have finished the hard work. Or have they? Integration planning turns to execution as people, process, and technology are combined once the deal is legally closed. The buyer will need to consider the purchased business or assets from the standpoint of employees, IT, customers, suppliers, and a multitude of other areas. In addition, numerous post-closing legal issues may arise, including purchase price adjustments, breaches of representations and warranties, enforcement of key negative employment-related covenants and restrictive covenants, collection of pre-closing accounts receivable, and true-ups of final financials. This episode guides listeners through the process, timing, and issues which most commonly arise after the closing of deals.
Part of the webinar series:
M&A BOOT CAMP - 2022
See more at https://www.financialpoise.com/webinars/
Key & Common Negotiated Provisions - Part 1 (Series: PRIVATE COMPANY M&A BOOT...Financial Poise
Although every deal is different, understanding any purchase/sale agreement will help you understand other purchase sale agreements. Stated another way, most M&A documents include a similar set of sections and use a similar vocabulary. Episodes 3 and 4 of this series explain specific, common provisions and discuss how buyers and sellers approach these provisions differently, particularly in light of situational differences (e.g. whether the assets being bought and sold are equity of a company or the assets of a company; whether the seller is going to cease to exists or not). Between Episodes 3 and 4, topics covered will include tax issues; corporate governance; closing conditions; representations and warranties; indemnification provisions; earn-outs; restrictive covenants; antitrust; intellectual property; and employment issues.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financialpoisewebinars/on_demand_webinars/common-negotiated-provisions-part-1/
Main Legal Risk Issues Facing Entrepreneurs | Virginia Suveiu | Lunch & Learn UCICove
About UCI Applied Innovation:
UCI Applied Innovation is a dynamic, innovative central platform for the UCI campus, entrepreneurs, inventors, the business community and investors to collaborate and move UCI research from lab to market.
About the Cove @ UCI:
To accelerate collaboration by better connecting innovation partners in Orange County, UCI Applied Innovation created the Cove, a physical, state-of-the-art hub for entrepreneurs to gather and navigate the resources available both on and off campus. The Cove is headquarters for UCI Applied Innovation, as well as houses several ecosystem partners including incubators, accelerators, angel investors, venture capitalists, mentors and legal experts.
Follow us on social media:
Facebook: @UCICove
Twitter: @UCICove
Instagram: @UCICove
LinkedIn: @UCIAppliedInnovation
For more information:
cove@uci.edu
http://innovation.uci.edu/
How to Structure Venture Capital Term Sheets for a Win-Win Deal ideatoipo
T 4/13/21 How to Structure Venture Capital Term Sheets for a Win-Win Deal
7 PM to 8:30 PM Pacific Time (Online)
https://www.meetup.com/Silicon-Valley-Startup-Idea-to-IPO/events/276787604/
Issue or ConsiderationSole Prop.General PartnershipLimited P.docxpriestmanmable
Issue or Consideration
Sole Prop.
General Partnership
Limited Partnership
Limited Liability Co
Subchapter “C”
Corporation
Subchapter “S”
Corporation
Liability
Unlimited personal liability
Unlimited personal “Joint and Several” liability for Partnership
Gen Partners (at least 1):unlimited liability
Limited Partners: Limited to investment
Shareholders- no personal liability beyond investment
Shareholders- no personal liability beyond investment
Ease of Formation
No formal requirements
No formal requirements
Requires formal filing
Requires formal filing
Requires formal filing and qualification and “election” with IRS
Ease of Operation
No issue
Limited concern- as agreed
ONLY General Partners operate
No participation of Limited Partners
Shared operation between Directors (major decisions) and Officers (day- to- day) and Shareholders (fundamental changes)
Shared operation between Directors (major decisions) and Officers (day- to- day) and Shareholders (fundamental changes
Taxation
No additional tax issue or burden
Partnership return with Pass through to individual partners
Partnership return with Pass through to individual partners
Possibility of double taxation
Avoids possibility of double taxation
Capitalization
Limited to loans (usually banks)
Limited to loans (usually banks)
Also have limited partner investment
Issue stock or Bonds
Issue stock or Bonds
Duration
Limited duration
Limited duration
Limited duration (gen. Partners) flexibility with limited partners
Perpetual
Perpetual
Alienation
No
No
No-General
Possible with Limited partners
Simple stock transfer
Simple stock transfer
Partnership Form of Business
The partnership is defined as the type of business operation formed between two or more persons interested in a common course: Making profits. The government recognizes a few kinds of partnerships (Lorette, n.d., para. 1). At the point when setting up an association, the first thing you will need to do is pick a name for the organization. While this may sound basic, it is imperative to make certain the name does not abuse the trademark privileges of another business. There are a few approaches to figure out whether another business as of now, has such a name. Firstly, one can do a name search online on the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office website. Also, one can conduct an inquiry of enrolled entrepreneurs. However, this procedure is followed via the legal office (secretary of state.)
Likewise, partners should decide the specifics of how the organization will be overseen, how much every accomplice will contribute, and how the benefits will be shared. While the more prominent the extent of the venture implies the bigger the rate of proprietorship, the greatest investor may not even need to maintain the business. Additionally, while you may confirm that all accomplices have equal force in choice making, certain accomplices ought to be recognized as having the power to settle on choices on everyday operations and the general ad ...
The presentation below examines some of the following topics:
Why should biotech companies look to sell rather than go public?
How (and why) to build your deal team
Legal matters, insurance planning and tax planning
Indemnification privisions and the advantages of doing it early on
Financial statement considerations
Corporate books and other items you will need
How to position your biotech company for a sale
Sharpen existing tools or get a new toolbox? Contemporary cluster initiatives...Orkestra
UIIN Conference, Madrid, 27-29 May 2024
James Wilson, Orkestra and Deusto Business School
Emily Wise, Lund University
Madeline Smith, The Glasgow School of Art
This presentation by Morris Kleiner (University of Minnesota), was made during the discussion “Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations” held at the Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 10 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/crps.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
0x01 - Newton's Third Law: Static vs. Dynamic AbusersOWASP Beja
f you offer a service on the web, odds are that someone will abuse it. Be it an API, a SaaS, a PaaS, or even a static website, someone somewhere will try to figure out a way to use it to their own needs. In this talk we'll compare measures that are effective against static attackers and how to battle a dynamic attacker who adapts to your counter-measures.
About the Speaker
===============
Diogo Sousa, Engineering Manager @ Canonical
An opinionated individual with an interest in cryptography and its intersection with secure software development.
Acorn Recovery: Restore IT infra within minutesIP ServerOne
Introducing Acorn Recovery as a Service, a simple, fast, and secure managed disaster recovery (DRaaS) by IP ServerOne. A DR solution that helps restore your IT infra within minutes.
Have you ever wondered how search works while visiting an e-commerce site, internal website, or searching through other types of online resources? Look no further than this informative session on the ways that taxonomies help end-users navigate the internet! Hear from taxonomists and other information professionals who have first-hand experience creating and working with taxonomies that aid in navigation, search, and discovery across a range of disciplines.
Eureka, I found it! - Special Libraries Association 2021 Presentation
Legal structures to attract investors and penetrate the global market
1. LEGAL STRUCTURES TO ESTABLISH TO ATTRACT
INVESTORS AND PENETRATE THE GLOBAL MARKET
MORENIKE KEHINDE
MAISÓN LEGAL
2. WHY DOYOU NEED INVESTORS?
• To start a business
• Business growth/Market expansion
• Diversification
• Intra-state branches
• Inter-state branches
• Global reach
• Competitive advantage
3. PRIVATE EQUITY
Private equity is a provision of equity capital by financial investors to non-quoted companies with high
growth potential. Private equity covers not only the financing required to create a business, but also
includes financing in the subsequent stages of its life cycle.
Private equity comes from high networth individuals and firms that purchase stakes in companies.
When sourcing for funding, investors will usually make a preliminary request for you to provide
documents which will include your corporate information, budgets, forecasts, key supplier/customer
contracts, employees and employment contracts, intellectual property portfolio, a schedule of
properties or leases, a list of equipment owned by the company, details of other investors,
shareholders, and bank loans, any existing or future litigation, tax filings, insurance documentation, and
data protection policies, amongst other things.
4. PROCESS – PRIVATE EQUITY
Expression of Interest/ Letter of Intent
Due Diligence - This is the investigatory work done before investment where the investor conducts
detailed research into the financial, corporate and contractual status of the company.
Term Sheet
The term sheet sets out the terms on which an investor will give funding, either by taking equity, a
convertible note, or another arrangement. It will also set out any conditions the company has to
meet in order to successfully gain funding. It will usually include decisions about dilution of shares
and decision making rights.
It is important to seek professional advice to ensure that each term is understood, and the
Solicitor negotiates the most favourable terms possible.
5. PROCESS – PRIVATE EQUITY
Long form documents
Shareholder’s Agreement or Investment Agreement- this will set out the agreed terms in the term
sheet in more detail. Future investors may want to see this agreement to know how much control
other investors have in your company.
Vesting Provisions (these can be drafted into the shareholder’s agreement) – vesting provisions are
usually designed to protect the investor or major shareholders from key members of the founding
team leaving the company soon after investment, meaning that certain shares will vest over time or
upon meeting certain milestones.
Subscription Agreement – this agreement is the promise of your business to sell a certain number
of shares to the investor at a certain price, and the agreement of the investor to pay that price.
Articles of Association – the Articles govern the operations of the company once it has received
the investment and it is a contract between the company and its members.
6. PROCESS – PRIVATE EQUITY
Closing Date - Once all the specific conditions of investment have been met, the documents have
been prepared and terms agreed, a closing date will be scheduled for execution of the agreements and
the transfer of the shares and funds.
Receive funding
7. DUE DILIGENCE – TO CONDUCT ON THE PRIVATE EQUITY FIRM (INVESTOR)
Companies registration certificate and constitution documents
All available public documents
Compliance declaration of all laws
Accredited investors - As provided in the Securities Act (US), this is a person who is permitted to invest in startups and
other high-risk private company securities. (For Companies interested in American Investors)
Rule 501(a).The principal categories of accredited investors are as follows
1. Directors, executive officers, and general partners of the issuer, including general partners of general partners in
two-tier syndicating. (The term "executive officers" is more fully defined in the Regulation.)
2. Purchasers whose net worth either individually or jointly with their spouse equals or exceeds $1 million. It is
important to note that while there is no definition of "net worth" in Regulation D, there similarly is no
requirement of liquidity in the calculation of net worth for this accreditation standard. Thus, a purchaser's home,
furnishings, etc. are includable in the determination of net worth.
8. DUE DILIGENCE – TO CONDUCT ON THE PRIVATE EQUITY FIRM (INVESTOR) CONTINUED.
3. Natural person purchasers who have "income" in excess of $200,000 in each of the two most recent years and
who reasonably expect an income in excess of $200,000 in current year (or $300,000, jointly with their spouse).
4. A business entity will be treated as a single accredited investor unless it was organized for the specific purpose of
acquiring the securities offered, in which case each beneficial owner of the security is counted separately.
What is their track record?
What is their vision for the company?
Are your objectives aligned?
How would it affect your next round of funding?
9. DUE DILIGENCE – TO CONDUCT ON THE START–UP/COMPANY
Companies looking to raise funds should prepare for due diligence before funding, this speeds up the
process once the potential funding partner/investor requests for the documents. It is important to give
complete and accurate information, and not hide information from investors.
Company Registration (Ltd, Plc.) –The entity must be able to allot shares to the investors
Corporate Governance (Transparency, Accountability, Risk, Systems and Policies)
Company Meetings (Board Meetings, Minute books, Resolutions etc.)
Business Plan
Valuation
Share capitalisation table - The cap table summarizes who owns what part of the company before and
after the financing. It is important for founders to understand exactly who owns what part of a
company and what the implications are in a potential funding round.
Contracts – Employees (Compliance with Labour laws),Vendors, Business partners, Consultants.
10. DUE DILIGENCE - CONTINUED
Intellectual Property (IP) - Locally and Globally
Portfolio Assessment
Ownership Assessment
Valuation of IP
Commercialisation
Data protection – Policies, Compliance
Disputes
Taxes – Pay your taxes to avoid penalties and a build up of high amounts that it becomes difficult to
pay up. Investors don’t want to carry burdens. (Tax Incentives forVenture Capital Companies)
Debt portfolio
Statutory and Regulatory Compliance
Professional Advisers (Lawyers,Accountants,Auditors etc.)
11. GAME THEORY
Game theory is a mathematical theory that deals with strategies for maximizing gains and minimizing
losses within prescribed constraints, such as the rules of a card game.
Game theory is widely applied in the solution of various decision-making problems, such as those of
military strategy and business policy. Game theory states that there are rules underlying situations that
affect how these situations will be played out. These rules are independent of the humans involved and
will predict and change how humans interact within the constructs of the situation. Knowing what
these invisible rules are is of major importance when entering into any type of negotiation.
Everyone has a natural negotiating style. These styles have analogues that can work either well or
poorly in trying to achieve a negotiated result. It's important to understand how certain styles work
well together, how some conflict, and how some have inherent advantages over one another. For
example, the Prisoner’s Dilemma.
Thus it is important to work with experienced professional advisers to guide the negotiation.
12. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR GLOBAL EXPANSION
While international expansion remains at the forefront of the expansion plans of many
companies, risks also abound. In particular, regulatory risk has become one of the major
concerns associated with international expansion.
Global expansion requires legal due diligence structured and specifically tailored for the
particular business. Some of the issues to consider when scaling your business globally are:
Governing Law - The importance of understanding the laws of the country as it relates to
your business cannot be over-emphasized. It is important to codify all the laws that affect your
business and use that as a plan before even launching the business, otherwise the business will
lose money, face major restrictions and may pay penalties caused by ignorance.
Contracts - The choice of the governing law and the choice of the competent jurisdiction in
case of a dispute where there are international contracts is a fundamental issue that must be
carefully addressed.
13. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR GLOBAL EXPANSION - CONTINUED
Legal Structure – The nature of your business and the country will determine the available legal
structures.
LLC’s/Corporations - In Canada for example, Limited Liability Companies (LLC), are considered
as a hybrid form of business, encompassing the characteristics of corporations and partnerships.
They are classified differently for tax purposes.
Corporations in Canada have more of a semblance to LLC’s in Nigeria.
Joint Venture - The creation of a joint venture together with a local partner will help the
company rely on a market player that has good knowledge of the market and the way it
operates. Through the creation of a joint subsidiary, a contractual partnership will be in place and
will enable the partners to respond jointly to any business requests and projects.
14. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR GLOBAL EXPANSION - CONTINUED
Corporate Governance – Most countries require a local presence for certain business activities in the
territory of the country. Sometimes a simple branch or representative office might be sufficient.
Other times, countries require a subsidiary to be established, which comes with a very different set of
compliance, regulatory risk and tax considerations.When establishing a foreign office or subsidiary,
one must consider the number of directors for the entity, local director requirements, local agents,
requirements for shareholder meetings, number of shareholders, amongst other requirements.
Regulatory compliance - Most countries require import/customs or export licenses to move
technology or products between the foreign jurisdictions. There may also be further regulatory
considerations unique to the type of service, product, or facility that will operate within the
jurisdiction.
15. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR GLOBAL EXPANSION - CONTINUED
Tax considerations - There may be different tax implications based on the choice of entity established
within a jurisdiction. One entity form could provide a more favourable tax result than another while
also serving the required functions within the jurisdiction.
Employment - To engage an employee in a new jurisdiction, companies may need to enter into local
employment agreements, use local payroll providers and enter into or adhere to applicable collective
bargaining agreements. There may also be issues in acquiring work permits for non-local nationals.
Such employees may be entitled to a set of benefits and rights not required in Nigeria.
16. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR GLOBAL EXPANSION - CONTINUED
Global equity - It is important to consider whether there are securities laws in place in the new
jurisdiction that would restrict or cause affirmative requirements to apply to the grant of awards. A
new jurisdiction may have unique fund remittance limits, reporting or repatriation requirements that
can cause restrictions, or affirmative requirements that apply to equity awards. There may be unusual
tax benefits or consequences to awarding equity to employees.
Data privacy; intellectual property, technology and information law - A new jurisdiction may have its
own requirements regarding data privacy registration, data transfer obligations, customer/employee
notifications, data monitoring and payment obligations. Local laws may have different requirements to
validate and enforce the intellectual property assignments by employees and independent contractors.
Local jurisdictions may have unique rules regarding trade secret protection, and local employees may
require special training to understand how to effectively protect company secrets. Appropriate
intercompany agreements should be in place to permit the use of relevant intellectual property by
newly formed subsidiaries or affiliates.
17. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR GLOBAL EXPANSION - CONTINUED
Company policies regarding security, trade secrets, compliance, privacy and non-compete policies may
need to be revised to comply with the rules of the new jurisdiction.