The document outlines the launch strategy and market analysis for Krispy Natural, emphasizing the competitive landscape and marketing tactics in the snack food industry. It highlights Pemberton's strengths, including a robust direct store delivery system, and identifies key competitors like Kraft and Kellogg's. Expectations for market share growth in different regions were met with mixed results, showcasing both strong consumer interest and concerns regarding sustainability of promotional strategies.

1. LAUNCHING KRISPY NATURAL
-Dhwani Kothari

2. INDEX
➤ About the company
➤ How to launch and sustain the growth of Krispy Natural in
the market
➤ Marketing strategy
➤ Results
➤ Marketing plans for each area
➤ Expectations vs Reality
➤ Conclusion
➤ Competitive response
2

3. Pemberton:
Introduction
➤ Pemberton was the snack food division of
Candler Enterprises, a multinational beverage
and snack goods manufacturer.
➤ Candler’s 2011 revenue was $18 billion, with
Pemberton contributing approximately $5
billion in sales.
➤ Was a market leader in the U.S. cookie and
bakery snacks segments of the sweet snack
market.
➤ Utilised a company-owned direct store delivery
(DSD) distribution system in which products
were delivered directly to retail outlets,
bypassing retailer’s warehouses and
distribution centres.
➤ Achieved a compounded annual growth rate
(CAGR) of 14% for revenue over the past five
years.

4. DIRECT STORE DELIVERY
➤ Pemberton DSD representatives delivered products from company
distribution centres to the retail stores and performed critical
merchandising function.
➤ DSD maximised sales and profit growth through greater control of
shelf space, more accurate forecasting, reduced stock-outs, and quicker
turnover of products.
➤ Pemberton had a superior DSD system and the benefits of DSD far
outweighed the added costs.
➤ DSD system cost Pemberton approximately 20 cents of every sales
dollar.

5. THREE KEY STRATEGIC PRIORITIES FOR THE COMPANY
➤ Building a collection of attractive, durable brands.
➤ Leveraging leading marketing, sales and DSD systems to
increase revenue and profits
➤ Building or acquiring capabilities in salty snack categories.

6. Income statement (% of revenue)

7. How to launch and sustain the growth of Krispy
Naturals in the snack market?

8. ➤ Industry overview
➤ Willingness to buy
the product
➤ Competitors
analysis

9. INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
➤ Retail cracker sales in the United States reached an estimated
$6.9 billion in 2011.
➤ A Mintel study of salty snacks in the United States reported
that 74% of respondents consumed crackers on a regular basis
and 34% ate them as part of regular weekly diet
➤ The growth rate for the overall cracker industry from 2008 to
2010 was approximately 2.2% CAGR.
➤ Volume sales rose in 2010, and represented the first volume
increase since 2006.

10. ALL OTHER CRACKERS
➤ segment experienced a 2.1% CAGR for the period from 2008
to 2010.
➤ Retail sales of “all other” crackers in the United States were
estimated at ~$5.1 billion in 2011, a 6.2% increase over
2010.
➤ The segment was forecasted to grow modestly (6–7% per
year), with growth driven by healthier, premium-priced
product introductions.

11. All other Crackers

12. CRACKERS WITH FILLINGS
➤ crackers-with-filling segment experienced the strongest
segment growth of approximately 14% in 2010.
➤ Annual growth was forecasted between 10–14% for the
segment over the next several years.
➤ Retail sales of crackers with filling in the United States were
estimated at ~$660 million in 2011, an 11% increase over
2010.

13. Crackers with fillings

14. Willingness to buy the product

15. COMPETITORS ANALYSIS
➤ Three main competitors are
1. Kraft Inc.
2. Kellogg's co
3. Pepperfridge Farm
➤ The in total account to 75% of the market place

16. Money spent by competitors on
advertisements

18. PRODUCT
➤ Increasing to multiple servings
➤ Improve the taste
➤ Health conscious

19. MARKETING
➤ Emphasized heavy advertising and
promotion to the end consumer as well as
appealing to the trade.
➤ Main focus on pull efforts would help
quickly establish the Krispy Natural brand.

20. DISTRIBUTION
➤ Effective DSD distribution
➤ optimizing the system to account for the
longer shelf life of crackers versus baked
goods and cookies.

21. ➤ Premium pricing strategy
➤ Pricing of approximately 155% the category
average cost per ounce was reasonable
considering the product’s superiority.
➤ Retail price for each package would be similar to
competitors in the category, but there would be
less quantity or weight in the Krispy Natural
package.

22. PROMOTION

23. PROJECTIONS

24. INCOME STATEMENT

26. COLUMBUS
➤ Five special “Krispy Force” representatives
were hired for this region, which were separate
from the traditional DSD route delivery
representatives.
➤ They worked with Pemberton regional and
district sales managers
➤ Focused solely on selling the new Krispy
Natural product line.

27. SOUTH EAST
➤ Regular Pemberton DSD route delivery
representatives worked with regional and
district sales managers, handling sales and
service of the new Krispy Natural line.
➤ Was able to test its ability to reposition the
product to a more premium offering.

29. HIGHLIGHTS

31. EXPECTATIONS
VS
REALITY
➤ Expectations
1. Columbus would achieve a market share
of 9%
2. South East’s market share will rise from
9 to 15%
3. Hoped 15% shelf life in both the
markets
➤ Reality
1 Columbus doubled the share target
achieving 18% share market with 30%
category expansion
2. Southeast had a slight increase to just
10% with little category expansion
3. Actual shelf space and display activity
was below what the team expected.

33. ➤ The large chain headquarter buyers were particularly
impressed with the consumer research results and inventory
turn estimates for Krispy Natural.
➤ They also loved all the promotional activity and consumer
advertising.
➤ The pull marketing really created a buzz and customers were
coming to the stores asking for Krispy Natural by name.

34. ➤ However, one industry analyst that
Fredrick had spoken with offered a less
encouraging view. According to the
analyst, the positive test market results
were driven by significant price
discounts, couponing, and sampling,
which were not sustainable on a
national level.
➤ Also, there were those in the industry
who felt the taste preference claims of
Krispy Natural were inflated and the
flavor was no better than current brand
offerings.

35. COMPETITIVE RESPONSE

36. DISCLAIMER
Created by Dhwani Kothari, J. D. Birla Institute ( Dpartment
of Management) during a marketing internship under Prof.
Sameer Mathur, IIM Lucknow
Dhwani Kothari