The document provides an overview and summary of the Land Public Transport Master Plan for Greater Kuala Lumpur/Klang Valley. The key points are:
1) The master plan aims to guide future land public transport decisions to achieve a 40% public transport modal share by 2030 through projects like MRT, LRT, BRT, and bus network improvements.
2) It outlines six subsidiary plans covering urban rail development, bus transformation, taxi transformation, interchange integration, land use planning, and travel demand management.
3) Major urban rail projects include the MRT Sungai Buloh-Kajang Line, LRT Kelana Jaya and Ampang line extensions, and KTM
A presentation by Mr Bill Cameron (Director: Public Transport: DOT) at the Transport Forum Month of Transport Celebrations 1 October 2015 hosted by University of Johannesburg. The theme for the event was: "Trends in Policy Development for Transport" and the topic for the presentation was: "Policy Conundrums in Urban Transport."
More like this on www.transportworldafrica.co.za
Comprehensive mobility plan jaipur
National Urban Transport Policy
Mobility issues – snapshot of today
Transport demand for the future
Evaluating and implementation of cmp
This Presentation shows a comparative study of 5 construction projects in India & abroad enabling us to understand the process of conducting Pre-Project feasibility analysis.
Transport for Cape Town’s role in encouraging public transportTristan Wiggill
A presentation by Ms Melissa Whitehead (Commissioner of Transport: TCT) at the Transport Forum special interest group proudly hosted by TCT in Cape Town on 10 December 2015. The theme for the event was: "Encouraging Public Transport". The topic of the presentation was: "Transport for Cape Town’s role in Encouraging Public Transport".
More like this on www.transportworldafrica.co.za
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
A presentation by Mr Bill Cameron (Director: Public Transport: DOT) at the Transport Forum Month of Transport Celebrations 1 October 2015 hosted by University of Johannesburg. The theme for the event was: "Trends in Policy Development for Transport" and the topic for the presentation was: "Policy Conundrums in Urban Transport."
More like this on www.transportworldafrica.co.za
Comprehensive mobility plan jaipur
National Urban Transport Policy
Mobility issues – snapshot of today
Transport demand for the future
Evaluating and implementation of cmp
This Presentation shows a comparative study of 5 construction projects in India & abroad enabling us to understand the process of conducting Pre-Project feasibility analysis.
Transport for Cape Town’s role in encouraging public transportTristan Wiggill
A presentation by Ms Melissa Whitehead (Commissioner of Transport: TCT) at the Transport Forum special interest group proudly hosted by TCT in Cape Town on 10 December 2015. The theme for the event was: "Encouraging Public Transport". The topic of the presentation was: "Transport for Cape Town’s role in Encouraging Public Transport".
More like this on www.transportworldafrica.co.za
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
land transport master plan.pptx
1. Land Public Transport Master Plan
GREATER KUALA LUMPUR / KLANG VALLEY
7th November2013
2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
MEETING THE
National Aspiration
MALAYSIALPT
Towards Transformation
NLPTMP
Overview
Role and Targets
GKL/KV
Overview
URDP
BTP
JOURNEYAHEAD
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. • Defining the Vision and Targets
• Setting the Path for Land PublicTransport Transformation
• Implementing the Policy
8. Strictly confidential and for internal use only.
Background
National Land Public Transport Master Plans (NLPTMP)…
2
3
4
1 Intended to guide decisions on
future land public transport
The Master plan is driven by a
vision and a series of national
objectives
It is based on a review of
existing conditions and
establishing goals and
objectives for the future
As guide decisions on future
land public transport
Achievement
Role of NLPTMP
To achieve Government
aspiration
8
9. Strictly confidential and for internal use only.
To make Public Transport as a
Rakyat’s choice of mobility
Target 40% model share
for public transport in the
urban areas by 2030
Increase PT connectivity in
Rural Area
Towards achieving:
Increase mobility
Livable cities
Economic growth and
transformation
Vision and Targets
National Land Public Transport Master Plans…
VISION
TARGETS
10. 1
▪ Target
40%
modal share
for public
transport in
the urban
areas by 2030
during AM
peak periods
▪ Increase PT
access in
Rural
Areas
National Land Public Transport Master Plan
- Targets, Strategic Objectives and Policies
▪ Promote healthy living
▪ Manage travel demand
▪ Encourage environmental sustainability
▪ Optimize PT infrastructure
Strategic Objectives Key Policies (14)
1 Physically well- connected
▪ Enhance urban connectivity
▪ Enhance rural and inter-city connectivity
2
Affordable and accessible to all
▪ Improve route-planning and explore alternative models
to ensure accessibility to the under-served
▪ Build sustainable land public transport models which
provide affordable services to public and financially
viable for operator
▪ Increase accessibility for the mobility impaired
3 Convenient and offer high
service levels and quality
▪ Raise service reliability of public transport
▪ Improve service standard for operators, drivers and
vehicles
▪ Develop seamless experience for the user
4
Safe and Secure
▪ Ensure high standards of safety and security for
operators
▪ Encourage and support safety initiatives
5
Better quality of life
12. 12
Regional
PTMP
Sectoral MP
Capital Region : Greater KL / KV
Iskandar (JB), Penang, Kuching, Kota Kinabalu
Freight
Rail
Ipoh, Seremban, Malacca, Kuantan, Kota Bharu, Kuala Terengganu, Alor Setar, Other Vehicles :Excursion Bus,Tow Trucks, Limo &
Kangar Hired Cars
National PT Policy
National PTMP
Greater KL/KV, Johor, Kedah, Kelantan, Melaka, Negeri Sembilan,
Pahang, Selangor, Perak, Perlis, Penang, Sabah, Sarawak,
Terengganu
13. Today, Greater Kuala Lumpur is an
important geographical area in Malaysia
Contributes 38% of Malaysia’s GDP…
…and home to 25% of Malaysia’population
Greater Kuala Lumpur:
• Malaysia’s financial centre –
• 83% employed in services sector
• 17% in manufacturing and
construction
• Flat valley land covering
0.85% of Malaysia’s land coverage)
• 7.2 million population of
93.5% urban
• Land use governed under jurisdiction of
10 local authorities and 2 states
• PT modes available include taxis,
buses, monorail, light rail and
heavy rail
GDP (RM billion)
530.6
(38.2%)
Population (million)
7.2
(25.4%)
14. 14
Pressing issues across our public transportation system today
Root cause
Issues faced by the public
Bus
▪ Lack of follow through in enforcement
▪ Non-conforming private operators, illegal route,
schedule deviation and poor service levels
▪ Eroding margins for operators exacerbated the
lack of service coverage and quality
▪ Industry structure and economics
▪ Unreliable service
(timeliness and routes)
▪ Slow travel times
▪ Capacity constraint
▪ Feeder constraint – under utilized segments due
to feeder shortages
▪ Lack reinvestment the past 12 years
▪ Packed LRT , Monorail
and KTM trains
▪ Tough getting to certain
stations
Rail
Network
▪ Minimal PT coverage in certain areas
▪ Lack integration between modes
▪ PT unavailability
▪ Excessive transfers to get
to destination
T
axi
▪ Lack of follow through in enforcement
▪ Industry structure and economics
▪ Poor driver conduct e.g.
haggling, overcharging
16. 80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2010 2012 2020-25 2030
M
o
d
a
l
S
h
a
r
e
2015
Y
ear
Aggressive Target
Demand management & other
support strategies
Base Target
Public transport improvement
measures
50 % base target
Modal share target for Centre of Gravity I = KL (within Middle Ring Road I)
60 % aggressive target
MODE SHARE TARGETS Base (%) Aggressive (%)
• Centre of gravity I = KL (within Middle Ring RoadI) 50 60
• Surrounding I = KL (within Middle Ring RoadII) 30 50
• Centre of gravityII = Shah Alam, Klang, Putrajaya, PJ (NewTown) 35 50
• Other key points = Selayang, Serdang, Rawang, Puchong, 20 25
Subang/Sunway, Kajang etc
10mil
6mil
Projected
population
growth -
2020
Public transport modal share in KL CBD is
targeted to triple by 2030
17. Pillars - Greater KL/KV LPTMP
Elements of the 6 subsidiary plans …
E L E M E N T S O F
T H E
S U B S I D I A R Y P L
A N S (1)
Urban Rail Development Plan
(URDP)
Main spine of PT
network
Provide increased PT capacity through enhancement to existing lines, extensions to existing
lines and the provision of new routes
The Projects:
Mass Rapit Transit (MRT) : MRT 1 Sg Buloh – Kajang Line
Upgrading KTM
Extension LRT Kelana Jaya Line
Bus Transformation Plan
(BTP)
Support and
feed
Feeder bus services to provide quick connection to primary and
secondary corridors and also provide local services to suburban centres
The Projects:
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) : Klang to Kuala Lumpur
Go Kuala Lumpur
Commuter Bus Improvement Plan (CBIP) – 19 Pilot project
areas have been identified
GO KL carrying more
than 10,000
passengers per day
Taxi Transformation Plan
(TTP)
Filling the gaps & quality
option (door to
door)
A high quality door to door service as a mode of choice for city centre trips where cost is not a
deciding factor
The Projects:
Establish 1 Malaysia taxi Brand – Taxi Rakyat 1 Malaysia (TR1MA)
Driver training programme
Central customer service centre
17
18. Pillars - Greater KL/KV LPTMP
Elements of the 6 subsidiary plans …
E L E M E N T S O F T H E S U B S I D I AR Y P L AN S (2)
Interchange and Integration
Plan (IIP)
Prepared by: Policy, Planning&
ResearchDivision
Version: Dec 2012
Review: Dec2013
POLICY GUIDELINESFOR
INTERCHANGE AND
INTEGRATION
Land Use Planning
(LUP)
Travel Demand Management
(TDM)
To encourage travel by more sustainable modes i.e. LPT and to reduce
reliance on private vehicle
Prepared by: Policy,
Planning & Research
Division
Version:Dec 2012
Review: Dec 2013
POLICY GUIDELINESFOR
TRAVEL DEMAND
MANAGEMENT (TDM)
Seek to influence land use policies and planning process to
favour LPT provision and performance
Policy
Framework
Planning
Process
Reduce the barriers to
enable mode shift
Sustainable mode shift
Driving up LPT mode share
more aggressively
18
Coordinate transport and development together by creating places
that are well used and valued
The Projects:
Ticketing Integration
Interchange and Integration guidelines
The Projects:
Travel demand management (TDM) guidelines
19.
20. 20
Role of Urban Rail
• The main spine of the future PT network
– to provide links to the center of KL .i.e. primary corridor
demand
• Aim to increase PT capacity through enhancement toexisting
lines, extensions to existing lines and the provision of new
routes
• The key link between the city to the airport
21. Key
KTM
KLIA (ERL)
Ampang Line
Putra Line
Monorail
Rail Line
General
Rail
Category
Route
length/ No.
of stations
Peak
Hour
Headway
Current
Daily
Ridership
KTM
Komuter
Suburban
Rail
157 km
50 Stations
15 min 95,000
LRT
Ampang
Line
Urban
Rail/
Metro
27 km
25 Stations
5 min 141,000
LRT Kelana
Jaya Line
Urban
Rail/
Metro
29 km
24 Stations
2.5 min 160,000
Monorail
Urban
Rail/
Metro
8.6 km
11 Stations
5 min 57,500
KLIA
Suburban
Rail/
Airport
Express
57 Km
5 stations
15 mins 11,000
Total
277.6 km
115 stations
5 min 464,500
Greater KL/KV LPTMP
Existing Rail Network
Strictly Confidential and for Internal Use
Only
22. TRAVEL TIMES
ACCESSIBILITY
IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT
NETWORK SUPPLY
The Urban Rail Development Plan
Desired outcome of the plan
• 48,000 cars equivalent or 12 lanes of
traffic are moved during peak hour by
2020 due to MRT1, MRT2 and MRT3
service ready in a traffic single direction
• Shorter wait time, quicker travel time
and improved reliability of train service
for communities from Klang – ShahAlam
– Subang to KL
• Improved employment opportunity with
increased accessibility
• Spurring economic activities through
increased economic activities and
investments
34.5km /
million people
More people
are within
75min to work
More people
able to travel
to KL within
75min
Reduce
negative
impact
(pollution)
Estimate ridership (trips) per day
increases by 5X to 2.3 Million
is key to achieve modal share of 50%
23. 2
3
The URDP
The Spine for GKLKV Land Public Transport Network
• Rail is the most efficient mode of transport
• There is a need to alleviate stress on existing lines
• Extension of network allows for more interchanges and better reach to areas of high
population growth
24. • Population catchment = 1.2 Million
• Daily Ridership = ~400,000
• Length = 51km (9.5km
underground)
• Station = 31 (elevated 24, under7)
• Project duration = 2011 – end
2016/early 2017
MRT BACKGROUND
25. Length : 17 km (Fully elevated)
Technical
Daily Ridership
No of Station
: 226,666
: 13
Overall work as at end Sept 2013 – 56.48% completed
AMPANG LINE
Project Started : 29 Oct 2008 Planned Completion : 28 Feb 2015
PDF Stage : Execute
Project Budget : RM 3.5 billion
Project Owner : Syarikat Prasarana Negara Berhad
Length : 17.7 km (Fully elevated)
Technical
Daily Ridership
No of Station
: 163,224
: 11
Overall work as at end Sept 2013 – 34.32% completed
The URDP
LRT Line Extension Project
LRT Line Extension Project consists of extending KLJ Line from Kelana Jaya and AMG Line from Sri Petaling to Putra Heights
with an integrated station at Putra HeightsTerminus
KELANA JAYALINE
Project Started : 29 Oct 2008 Planned Completion : 30 Jun 2015
PDF Stage : Execute
Project Budget : RM 3.5 billion
Project Owner : Syarikat Prasarana Negara Berhad
27. 27
LRT Line Extension Project
Nos Station Location
1 Station 2 Ara Damansara
2 Station 3 Glenmarie
3 Station 4 Subang Jaya
4 Station 7 USJ 7
5 Station 10 USJ 10
Park & Ride Facilities
KELANA JAYALINE
Nos Station No Location
1 Station 1 Awan Besar
2 Station 2 Kg. Muhibbah
3 Station 4 Bukit Jalil Highway 2_Giant
4 Station 6 IOI Mall LDP
5 Station 7 Tesco LDP
6 Station 8 Bandar Puteri Puchong
7 Station 13 Putra Heights
AMPANG LINE
29. •Aims to ensure sustainability of service
•Profitable routes would be divided
amongst operators
•Operators are required to ply social
routes to ensure better reach
•Bus service would act as feeders to
rail networks
•Cost model would be changed to a “pay
per km travelled” model
•BRT would be introduced for more
efficient movement
•BET increases reach and maximises
existing infrastructure by introducing
routes through under used highways
•12 corridors were identified
•Projected to double AM peak ridership
by 2015
CBIP (GKLKV) : Phase 1 & 2
Rationalisation of bus networks and introduction of
new concepts (i.e. BRT & BET)
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) & Bus
Express Transit (BET)
30. • BRT is identified as one of
initiatives under National Key
Results Area (NKRA) – Urban Public
Transport (UPT), under the
Malaysia’s Government
Transformation Program (GTP)
• 12 BRT corridors were identified in
Greater KL/KV Public Transport
Master Plan
• KL – Klang BRT is also planned as
the 1st BRT under Greater KL/Klang
Valley Public Transport Masterplan.
• The corridor is planned to pass
through 3 main roads in Klang
Valley i.e. Federal Highway, Jalan
Syed Putra or Jalan Tun
Sambanthan.
• SPAD is currently reviewing the
initial concept design of BRT KL –
Klang
BRT in Greater KL/Klang Valley
7
31. Proposed KL-Klang BRT Corridor
Stations:
Station
m
1. Pasar Seni
2. Dayabumi
3. Kuala Lumpur Rail
4. KL Sentral
5. Travers
6. Brickfield
7. Mid Valley
8. Universiti
9. Gasing
10. Taman Jaya
11. Asia Jaya
12. S51
13. Seri Setia
14. Setia Jaya
15. Subang Jaya
16. Glenmarie
17. Batu Tiga
18. Stadium Shah Ala
19. Kayangan
20. Shah Alam
21. UITM
22. Padang Jawa
23. i-City
24. Bukit Raja
25. Berkeley
26. Bukit Kuda
27. Bandar Kelang
(2 reserve stations)
MBSA
MPSJ
MBPJ
MPK
DBKL
Subang Jaya – Petaling Jaya
Area
Klang – Shah AlamArea
Phase 1
•5.75 km Buslane
•7 stations
Phase 1
•13.95 km Busway
•8 stations
Phase 2
•19.8 km future busway
•12 stations Length : 33.5 km x 3km radius
Catchment Area: 256 km2
Population : 1.58 million
Employment : 1.02 million
Kota Darul
Ehsan
Bt. 3 Toll
Plaza
Sg. Rasau
Toll Plaza
Kerinchi – Pasar Seni
Area
Pasar
Seni HAB
Construction period
Phase 1: Nov 2014- Apr 2016
Phase 2: July 2015 – Dec 2016
32. Going forward – Proposed BRT Corridors
Kuala Lumpur - Klang
Taman Melawati -
Puchong Puchong –
Kuala Lumpur Ampang
– Kuala Lumpur
Kinrara - Damansara
Bandar Sunway – USJ 6
Ampang - Kepong
Kota Damansara – Shah
Alam Shah Alam – Putra
Heights Putra Heights -
Putrajaya Putrajaya -
Kajang 8
41. Greater KL/KV LPTMP
No Bus Right of Ways
Unhealthy
competition
Commuter Bus Improvement Plan (CBIP)
Current Scenario
Too Many
Operators
operating within
the same corridor
Moving Forward
Introducing
Commuter Bus Improvement Plan (CBIP)
•Reduced duplication
•Upgrade bus facilities
•Improve services
•Create new bus lanes
•Serve additional social
routes
•Improve feeder at KTM
Komuter
•Cover 75% population
residing within 400m of PT
modes
New Business Model will be introduced
• Priority will be given to existing operator who has
first right of refusal
• Fare-box collection to be transferred to PT Fund
• Payment to operators : Contractual based on
service vehicle-km *
• Cover more than 75% population residing within
400m of PT modes
Phase 1
Phase 2
Strictly Confidential and for Internal Use
Only
42. CBIP : Phase 1
Existing Network – Primary Trunk Corridors
RapidKL
Metro
Len Seng
: 9 routes
: 3 routes
: 1 route
Total : 13 routes
Corridors : 5
Routes : 233
• Primary Trunk : 121
• Secondary Trunk : 67
• Feeder : 45
• Others : 8
: 23 routes
: 8 routes
: 2 routes
: 2 routes
: 2 routes
: 1 route
RapidKL
Metro
Causeway Link
Cityliner
Wawasan Sutera
Seranas
Total: 38 routes
RapidKL : 2 routes
Total : 2 routes
RapidKL : 15 routes
Metro : 8 routes
Selangor Omnibus : 6 routes
SJ Bus : 5 routes
Total : 34 routes
RapidKL
Metro
Setara Jaya
: 8 routes
: 3 routes
: 1 route
Total : 12 routes
RapidKL
Metro
Setara Jaya
Sri Indah
: 14 routes
: 5 routes
: 3 routes
: 2 route
Total: 24 routes
PUDU
CORRIDOR
SYED PUTRA
CORRIDOR
SEMANTAN
CORRIDOR
IPOH
CORRIDOR
PAHANG
CORRIDOR
AMPANG
CORRIDOR
KL City Centre
Strictly Confidential and for Internal Use
43. IPOH
CORRIDOR
SG BESI
CORRIDOR
KLANG LAMA
CORRIDOR
PERSEKUTUAN
CORRIDOR
DAMANSARA
CORRIDOR
RapidKL : 10 routes
Metro : 4 routes
Causeway Link : 1 route
Cityliner : 2 routes
Wawasan Sutera : 1 route
Seranas : 1 route
Total: 19 routes
RapidKL : 12 routes
Selangor : 8 routes
SJ Bus : 6 routes
Total : 26 routes
RapidKL : 5 routes
Metro : 5 routes
Total: 10 routes
RapidKL : 2 routes
Total : 2 routes
AMPANG
CORRIDOR
CHERAS CORRIDOR
RapidKL : 8 routes
Setara Jaya : 1 route
Total : 9 routes
RapidKL : 12 routes
Total: 12 routes
PAHANG CORRIDOR
RapidKL : 8 routes
Len Seng : 1 route
Total : 9
CBIP : Phase 1
Draft Revised Network – Primary Trunk Corridors
(Subject to SPAD’s LC approval)
Corridors : 8
Routes : 290
• Primary Trunk : 93
• Secondary Trunk: 110
• Feeder : 77
• Others : 10
Strictly Confidential and for Internal Use Only
Metro : 5 routes
Sri Indah : 2 routes
Total: 7 routes
44. 1
Hentian Akhir Bandar (HUB)
• For end destination in city center (DBKL)
• Pasar Seni
• Munshi Abdullah
• Jalan Tun Perak
• Construct at other LocalAuthorities
Upgrade bus stop
• 1300 bus stops has been upgraded since 2010
• More will be build from 2013 - 2015
• Covering 12 local authorities
Bus Panel Information
• Cover all bus stop in GKL
• Installation in stages from 2014 onwards
2
3
Strictly Confidential and for Internal Use Only
Greater KL/KV LPTMP
CBIP : Improving the facilities for the public
45. The Greater KL/Klang Valley LPTMP
Phasing of various elements
2011 2015 2020 2025 2030
Freight Relief Line
MRT Circle Line (& extension)
MRT N-S Line (& extension)
LRT3 Kelana Jaya- Klang
MRT1 (SB-K)
KTM Upgrade
extension
extension
: Proposal
: Implementation subject to viability in
terms of travel demand, feasibility etc
Bus Stop infrastructure
Bus Network planning
Bus Regulation Transition
Taxi Regulation Transition
BRT Corridors
Real Time information
Fares integration
LRT1 & 2 Extensions
Initial TDM Measures
Phase 2
Phase 1
Road User Charging
KL Monorail Extension
Putrajaya Monorail
KL Monorail Metropolis Ext.
Outer Orbital Line
Performance Monitoring
46. 2015
25%
Bus
Taxi
Rail
• KTM KomuterEnhancement
• LRT extensionand
expansion
• KL Monorail extensionand
expansion
• CBIP-pilot projects
• Bus Rapid Transit (KL-Klang)
• Bus Stop Programme
• CBIP GKLKV (Phase 1)
• Performance MonitoringHub
System (PMHS)
• Enforcement & Regulations
• Centralized Taxi Service
System (CTSS)
• New Taxi Business Model
Integration
Travel Demand
• Automated Fare Collection
• Pedestrian Linkages
(Skywalk)
• Drop off, Park ‘n’ Ride
• KTM Station upgrade
• ParkingControls
• JourneyPlanner
• Car Free Zone
Capital Cities 8%
OTHER
2020
Rail
• MRT Line 1
• Monorail
Putrajaya/Cyberjaya
Bus
• Full implementation of CBIP
for nationwide
• BRT KL & JB
OTHER
30%
Capital Cities15%
2030
Rail
• MRT Line 2 & 3
• HSR
• RTS
• Urban Rail Penang & JB
Bus
• More BRT line in KL e.g.
Puchong, Ampang etc
• BRT Kuching, KK
OTHER
Capital Cities
40%
• Implementation of PT‘push
factors” e.g. ERP etc
Travel Demand
THE JOURNEY AHEAD
47. “The National LPT Master Plan and GKL/KV LPT Master
Plan was approved by Cabinet on 16th October 2013”
Status