WELCOME
PRESENTED BY 
MANU.V
LAND REVENUE POLICY
Permanent settlement 
LORD CORNWALLIS introduced a revenue 
system in the states of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa 
known as PERMANANENT SETTLEMENT. This 
was a pact made with the Zamindars, who 
collected revenue from the peasants and handed 
over a fixed amount to the British.
The Zamindars extracted exorbitant 
revenue from the peasant and become 
wealthy. The company also received 
their share without any failure. But the 
condition of peasants, who were 
unable to bear the tax burden, was 
pathetic
Ryotwari system 
This system prevailed in the southern 
provinces of British India. Under this 
system company collected revenue 
directly from farmers. But they did 
not provide any proprietary rights on 
the cultivating land to the peasants. 
The taxes were also very high.
MAHALWARI SYSTEM 
This system of revenue collection 
prevailed in the central and northern 
provinces of British India. According 
to this system, the company collected 
the tax remitted by village heads or 
heads of joint families and not from 
the individual farmers.
EFFECTS ON 
PEASANTS 
East India company levied taxes in 
the form of liquid cash. 
In order to simplify the taxation 
process ,all the lands were measured 
and ‘’pattas’’ were issued to the 
farmers. 
Taxes were calculated according to 
the extent of land
They had to pay a fixed amount and 
there was no relaxation even for crop 
failure. 
The peasants had to take loans from 
the rural money lenders to pay their 
taxes. 
The indebted farmers were ill-treated 
by the money lenders. The police and the 
court also supported the money lenders 
and Zamindars.
The intensity of the exploitation 
faced by the peasants increased day 
by day and finally led to the clashes 
between landlords and peasants.
CONCLUSION 
The land revenue policies 
adopted by the British worked 
As tool to exploit the poor 
peasants as we discussed above.
THANK YOU

Land revenue system

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Permanent settlement LORDCORNWALLIS introduced a revenue system in the states of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa known as PERMANANENT SETTLEMENT. This was a pact made with the Zamindars, who collected revenue from the peasants and handed over a fixed amount to the British.
  • 5.
    The Zamindars extractedexorbitant revenue from the peasant and become wealthy. The company also received their share without any failure. But the condition of peasants, who were unable to bear the tax burden, was pathetic
  • 6.
    Ryotwari system Thissystem prevailed in the southern provinces of British India. Under this system company collected revenue directly from farmers. But they did not provide any proprietary rights on the cultivating land to the peasants. The taxes were also very high.
  • 7.
    MAHALWARI SYSTEM Thissystem of revenue collection prevailed in the central and northern provinces of British India. According to this system, the company collected the tax remitted by village heads or heads of joint families and not from the individual farmers.
  • 8.
    EFFECTS ON PEASANTS East India company levied taxes in the form of liquid cash. In order to simplify the taxation process ,all the lands were measured and ‘’pattas’’ were issued to the farmers. Taxes were calculated according to the extent of land
  • 9.
    They had topay a fixed amount and there was no relaxation even for crop failure. The peasants had to take loans from the rural money lenders to pay their taxes. The indebted farmers were ill-treated by the money lenders. The police and the court also supported the money lenders and Zamindars.
  • 10.
    The intensity ofthe exploitation faced by the peasants increased day by day and finally led to the clashes between landlords and peasants.
  • 11.
    CONCLUSION The landrevenue policies adopted by the British worked As tool to exploit the poor peasants as we discussed above.
  • 12.