SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
Implantable
cardioverter-
defibrillators
DR. KHAIRI AL-ZIREI
INTERNAL MEDICINE RESIDENT
Overview
 Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a common cause of sudden cardiac death
(SCD) and is sometimes preceded by monomorphic or polymorphic
ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although cardiopulmonary resuscitation,
including chest compressions and assisted ventilation, can provide
transient circulatory support for the patient with cardiac arrest, the only
effective approach for terminating VF is electrical defibrillation
 Success with external defibrillation led to the development of an
implantable defibrillator, followed in 1980 by the first automatic internal
defibrillator implantation in humans . FDA approval followed in 1985,
initially only for secondary prevention in survivors of cardiac arrest.
Indications
Secondary prevention :
1- Patients with a prior episode of resuscitated VT/VF or sustained
hemodynamically unstable VT in whom a completely reversible cause cannot
be identified.
Includes :
- Those with idiopathic VT/VF and congenital long QT syndrome,
but not patients who have VT/VF limited to the first 48 hours after an
acute myocardial infarction (MI).
2- Patients with episodes of spontaneous sustained VT in the presence of
heart disease (valvular, ischemic, hypertrophic, dilated, or infiltrative
cardiomyopathies) and other settings (e.g., channelopathies).
Indications
 Primary prevention
1- Patients with a prior MI (at least 40 days ago) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
≤30 percent.
2- Patients with a cardiomyopathy, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II to
III , and LVEF ≤35 percent.
3- Heart failure patients who have intraventricular conduction delay (≥120 milliseconds) .
4- High risk for life-threatening VT/VF includes :
- Patients with congenital long QT syndrome who have recurrent symptoms and/or
torsades de pointes despite therapy with beta blockers .
- High-risk patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or arrhythmogenic right ventricular
ventricular (RV) cardiomyopathy.
- High-risk patients with Brugada syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic VT
Not Recommended
1. Patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias due to a completely reversible
disorder in the absence of structural heart disease.
2. Patients who do not have a reasonable expectation of survival with an
acceptable functional status for at least one year.
3. Patients with incessant VT or VF in whom other therapies (e.g., catheter
ablation) should be considered first.
4. Patients with severe psychiatric illnesses that may be aggravated by
device implantation
Not Recommended
5. Patients with VF or VT amenable to surgical or catheter ablation in whom
the risk of sudden cardiac death is normalized after successful ablation.
6. Patients with syncope without inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias and
without structural heart disease.
When To Consider
 Patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with LV ejection
fraction (LVEF) ≤35 percent and it should be performed after patients have
received optimal (maximum tolerated up to target doses) evidence-based
medical therapy for at least three months after initial diagnosis of HFrEF
(or for at least 40 days after myocardial infarction) and after identification
and treatment of any reversible causes of LV systolic dysfunction .
 Some patients with LVEF between 35 and 50 percent may be candidates
for CRT, including those anticipated to require frequent ventricular pacing
(generally >40 percent of the time) or who have a QRS ≥150 ms with left
bundle branch block (LBBB) and refractory symptoms attributable to HF.
Choice between CRT-D versus CRT-P
 There are no prospective data demonstrating a survival benefit of CRT-D over
CRT-P .
 In observational studies , Those less likely to benefit from CRT-D compared
with CRT-P include :
1- older patients (age ≥75 years)
2- patients without coronary artery disease particularly if they are without dilated
LV or midwall fibrosis
3- pacemaker-dependent patients without coronary artery disease.
CRT-P devices are smaller, less expensive, possibly incur less risk of infection, and
have been subject to fewer recalls and advisories .
ELEMENTS OF THE ICD
 The ICD system is comprised of the following elements :
1. Pacing/sensing electrodes
2. Defibrillation electrodes
3. Pulse generator
khairi.pptx
khairi.pptx
khairi.pptx

More Related Content

Similar to khairi.pptx

Atrial fibrillation: rate or ryhthm?
Atrial fibrillation: rate or ryhthm?Atrial fibrillation: rate or ryhthm?
Atrial fibrillation: rate or ryhthm?
Basem Enany
 
محاضرة_6_التمريض_تقنيات_التخدير_مرحلة_4.pdf
محاضرة_6_التمريض_تقنيات_التخدير_مرحلة_4.pdfمحاضرة_6_التمريض_تقنيات_التخدير_مرحلة_4.pdf
محاضرة_6_التمريض_تقنيات_التخدير_مرحلة_4.pdf
AhmedAlssaeatiu
 
treatment of hypertrophy cardiomyopathy
treatment of hypertrophy cardiomyopathytreatment of hypertrophy cardiomyopathy
treatment of hypertrophy cardiomyopathy
hung hung
 

Similar to khairi.pptx (20)

02 pacemakers and ic ds an overview-samir rafla
02 pacemakers and ic ds an overview-samir rafla02 pacemakers and ic ds an overview-samir rafla
02 pacemakers and ic ds an overview-samir rafla
 
Atrial flutter (AFl) – management principals
Atrial flutter (AFl) – management principalsAtrial flutter (AFl) – management principals
Atrial flutter (AFl) – management principals
 
Atrial fibrillation: rate or ryhthm?
Atrial fibrillation: rate or ryhthm?Atrial fibrillation: rate or ryhthm?
Atrial fibrillation: rate or ryhthm?
 
محاضرة_6_التمريض_تقنيات_التخدير_مرحلة_4.pdf
محاضرة_6_التمريض_تقنيات_التخدير_مرحلة_4.pdfمحاضرة_6_التمريض_تقنيات_التخدير_مرحلة_4.pdf
محاضرة_6_التمريض_تقنيات_التخدير_مرحلة_4.pdf
 
treatment of hypertrophy cardiomyopathy
treatment of hypertrophy cardiomyopathytreatment of hypertrophy cardiomyopathy
treatment of hypertrophy cardiomyopathy
 
Deep Vein Thrombosis in stroke patients
Deep Vein Thrombosis in stroke patientsDeep Vein Thrombosis in stroke patients
Deep Vein Thrombosis in stroke patients
 
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
Cardiac resynchronization therapyCardiac resynchronization therapy
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
 
Complications ami
Complications amiComplications ami
Complications ami
 
Atrial fibrillation ksaus hs 2019
Atrial fibrillation ksaus hs 2019Atrial fibrillation ksaus hs 2019
Atrial fibrillation ksaus hs 2019
 
0 - how to approach my patient with ventricular arrhythmia-samir rafla
0 - how to approach my patient with ventricular arrhythmia-samir rafla0 - how to approach my patient with ventricular arrhythmia-samir rafla
0 - how to approach my patient with ventricular arrhythmia-samir rafla
 
STEMI F5.pptx
STEMI F5.pptxSTEMI F5.pptx
STEMI F5.pptx
 
Device therapy in heart failure
Device therapy in  heart failureDevice therapy in  heart failure
Device therapy in heart failure
 
Heart transplantation
Heart transplantationHeart transplantation
Heart transplantation
 
Cardiogenic Shock.pdf
Cardiogenic Shock.pdfCardiogenic Shock.pdf
Cardiogenic Shock.pdf
 
Atrial fibrillation (af)
Atrial fibrillation (af)Atrial fibrillation (af)
Atrial fibrillation (af)
 
Preoperative evaluation for adult cardiac surgry
Preoperative evaluation for adult cardiac surgryPreoperative evaluation for adult cardiac surgry
Preoperative evaluation for adult cardiac surgry
 
Acute Coronary syndrome
Acute Coronary syndrome Acute Coronary syndrome
Acute Coronary syndrome
 
Cardiac surgery and ptca
Cardiac surgery and ptcaCardiac surgery and ptca
Cardiac surgery and ptca
 
Journal club by Dr sivanand patel (1. substernal icd 2. vldl 3. polypill t...
Journal club by Dr sivanand patel (1.  substernal icd  2. vldl  3. polypill t...Journal club by Dr sivanand patel (1.  substernal icd  2. vldl  3. polypill t...
Journal club by Dr sivanand patel (1. substernal icd 2. vldl 3. polypill t...
 
Cardiac arrest seminar
Cardiac arrest seminarCardiac arrest seminar
Cardiac arrest seminar
 

Recently uploaded

Disaster management for class 10 students
Disaster management for class 10 studentsDisaster management for class 10 students
Disaster management for class 10 students
madhav072009
 
LECTURE maintenance management is important 1.pptx
LECTURE maintenance management is important 1.pptxLECTURE maintenance management is important 1.pptx
LECTURE maintenance management is important 1.pptx
shahzadnasim3
 

Recently uploaded (11)

Spring-2024-Priesthoods of Augustus Yale Historical Review
Spring-2024-Priesthoods of Augustus Yale Historical ReviewSpring-2024-Priesthoods of Augustus Yale Historical Review
Spring-2024-Priesthoods of Augustus Yale Historical Review
 
Team Dynamics: A Journey to Excellence
Team Dynamics: A Journey to ExcellenceTeam Dynamics: A Journey to Excellence
Team Dynamics: A Journey to Excellence
 
DrupalCamp Atlanta 2022 - Effective Project Management
DrupalCamp Atlanta 2022 - Effective Project ManagementDrupalCamp Atlanta 2022 - Effective Project Management
DrupalCamp Atlanta 2022 - Effective Project Management
 
Group work -meaning and definitions- Characteristics and Importance
Group work -meaning and definitions- Characteristics and ImportanceGroup work -meaning and definitions- Characteristics and Importance
Group work -meaning and definitions- Characteristics and Importance
 
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson,.pdf
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson,.pdfTEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson,.pdf
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson,.pdf
 
W.H.Bender Quote 63 You Must Plan T.O.P Take-Out Packaging
W.H.Bender Quote 63 You Must Plan T.O.P Take-Out PackagingW.H.Bender Quote 63 You Must Plan T.O.P Take-Out Packaging
W.H.Bender Quote 63 You Must Plan T.O.P Take-Out Packaging
 
Disaster management for class 10 students
Disaster management for class 10 studentsDisaster management for class 10 students
Disaster management for class 10 students
 
Marketing Management 16 Global Edition by Philip Kotler test bank.docx
Marketing Management 16 Global Edition by Philip Kotler test bank.docxMarketing Management 16 Global Edition by Philip Kotler test bank.docx
Marketing Management 16 Global Edition by Philip Kotler test bank.docx
 
Leading People - Harvard Manage Mentor Certificate
Leading People - Harvard Manage Mentor CertificateLeading People - Harvard Manage Mentor Certificate
Leading People - Harvard Manage Mentor Certificate
 
LECTURE maintenance management is important 1.pptx
LECTURE maintenance management is important 1.pptxLECTURE maintenance management is important 1.pptx
LECTURE maintenance management is important 1.pptx
 
Management 13th Edition by Richard L. Daft test bank.docx
Management 13th Edition by Richard L. Daft test bank.docxManagement 13th Edition by Richard L. Daft test bank.docx
Management 13th Edition by Richard L. Daft test bank.docx
 

khairi.pptx

  • 2. Overview  Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a common cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and is sometimes preceded by monomorphic or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including chest compressions and assisted ventilation, can provide transient circulatory support for the patient with cardiac arrest, the only effective approach for terminating VF is electrical defibrillation  Success with external defibrillation led to the development of an implantable defibrillator, followed in 1980 by the first automatic internal defibrillator implantation in humans . FDA approval followed in 1985, initially only for secondary prevention in survivors of cardiac arrest.
  • 3. Indications Secondary prevention : 1- Patients with a prior episode of resuscitated VT/VF or sustained hemodynamically unstable VT in whom a completely reversible cause cannot be identified. Includes : - Those with idiopathic VT/VF and congenital long QT syndrome, but not patients who have VT/VF limited to the first 48 hours after an acute myocardial infarction (MI). 2- Patients with episodes of spontaneous sustained VT in the presence of heart disease (valvular, ischemic, hypertrophic, dilated, or infiltrative cardiomyopathies) and other settings (e.g., channelopathies).
  • 4. Indications  Primary prevention 1- Patients with a prior MI (at least 40 days ago) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30 percent. 2- Patients with a cardiomyopathy, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II to III , and LVEF ≤35 percent. 3- Heart failure patients who have intraventricular conduction delay (≥120 milliseconds) . 4- High risk for life-threatening VT/VF includes : - Patients with congenital long QT syndrome who have recurrent symptoms and/or torsades de pointes despite therapy with beta blockers . - High-risk patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or arrhythmogenic right ventricular ventricular (RV) cardiomyopathy. - High-risk patients with Brugada syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic VT
  • 5. Not Recommended 1. Patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias due to a completely reversible disorder in the absence of structural heart disease. 2. Patients who do not have a reasonable expectation of survival with an acceptable functional status for at least one year. 3. Patients with incessant VT or VF in whom other therapies (e.g., catheter ablation) should be considered first. 4. Patients with severe psychiatric illnesses that may be aggravated by device implantation
  • 6. Not Recommended 5. Patients with VF or VT amenable to surgical or catheter ablation in whom the risk of sudden cardiac death is normalized after successful ablation. 6. Patients with syncope without inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias and without structural heart disease.
  • 7. When To Consider  Patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35 percent and it should be performed after patients have received optimal (maximum tolerated up to target doses) evidence-based medical therapy for at least three months after initial diagnosis of HFrEF (or for at least 40 days after myocardial infarction) and after identification and treatment of any reversible causes of LV systolic dysfunction .  Some patients with LVEF between 35 and 50 percent may be candidates for CRT, including those anticipated to require frequent ventricular pacing (generally >40 percent of the time) or who have a QRS ≥150 ms with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and refractory symptoms attributable to HF.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10. Choice between CRT-D versus CRT-P  There are no prospective data demonstrating a survival benefit of CRT-D over CRT-P .  In observational studies , Those less likely to benefit from CRT-D compared with CRT-P include : 1- older patients (age ≥75 years) 2- patients without coronary artery disease particularly if they are without dilated LV or midwall fibrosis 3- pacemaker-dependent patients without coronary artery disease. CRT-P devices are smaller, less expensive, possibly incur less risk of infection, and have been subject to fewer recalls and advisories .
  • 11. ELEMENTS OF THE ICD  The ICD system is comprised of the following elements : 1. Pacing/sensing electrodes 2. Defibrillation electrodes 3. Pulse generator