© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
Focus on Intellectual Property for New Media
Taking Stock in
Developing IP Law
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
2
1 Copyright
2 Rights of Publicity
3 Patents
4 Trademark
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 3
Key Developments in
Copyright Law
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 4
Calling Balls and Strikes
FAIR USE
DECISIONS
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 5
1DVRs Okay, Copying to
Remove Ads Not
Fox Broad. Co. v. Dish Network, LLC, No. 2:12-cv-04529-DMG-
SH (C.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2015)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 6
2
Digital Reproductions
of Images Okay to Sell
Physical Products
Rosen v. eBay, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-06801-MWF-E (C.D. Cal. Jan.
16, 2015)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 7
3
Reproducing Photos on
Commercial Social
Media Page Iffy
N. Jersey Media Grp., Inc. v. Pirro, No.1:13-cv-07153-ER
(S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2015)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 8
4Indexing Video and
Providing Clips Okay
Fox News Network, LLC v. TVEyes, Inc., No. 1:13-cv-05315-AKH
(S.D.N.Y. Sept. 9, 2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 9
5
Limited Recreation and
Use of Film Scenes
Okay
Arrow Prods., Ltd. v. The Weinstein Co., LLC, No. 1:13-cv-05488-
TPG (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 10
6
Artistic Recreation of
Photograph for T-Shirt
Okay
Kienitz v. Sconnie Nation, LLC, 766 F.3d 756 (7th Cir. 2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 11
7
Inclusion of Sculpture
In Architectural Photos
Okay
Neri v. Monroe, No. 11-cv-429-slc (W.D. Wis. Feb. 26, 2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 12
8Digitizing and Indexing
Books Okay
Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google Inc., 954 F. Supp. 2d 282 (S.D.N.Y.
2013)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 13
Actor Expression
COPYRIGHT IN
PERFORMANCE
Garcia v. Google, No. 12-57302 (9th Cir. May 18 2015) (en banc)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 14
Copyright in Code
PROTECTING API
INTERFACES
Oracle v. Google, 750 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 15
Short on Nutrition
SHORT ON
COPYRIGHT
Gorski v. Gymboree Corp., No. 14-CV-01314 (N.D. Cal. July 16,
2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 16
Key Developments in
Rights of Publicity Law
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 17
1
Congratulating
Celebrity in Ad
Probably Not Okay
Michael Jordan v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc, Case No. 12 1992 (7th
Cir., Feb. 19, 2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 18
2
Selling Stylized Image of
Historically Significant
Figure Okay
Rosa Parks and Raymond ParksInstitute for Self Development v.
Target Corporation, No. 2:12-CV-817 (M.D. Ala. Feb. 9, 2015).
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 19
3
Focus on Realistic
Replication of Key
Figures Not Okay
Keller v. Elec. Arts, 724 F.3d 1268 (9th Cir. 2013)
Davis v. Elec. Arts, No. 12-15737 (9th Cir. Jan. 6, 2015)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 20
4
Reproduction of
Historically Significant
Figures Okay
Noriega v. Activision/Blizzard, No. BC 551747, Slip Op. (Sup. Ct.
Cal. Oct. 27, 2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 21
Key Developments in
Patent Law
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 22
The New Reality For
SOFTWARE
PATENTABILITY
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 23
The Supreme Court
Changed Everything
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, 134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 24
1 Is the claim directed to
an abstract idea?
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 25
2
Do the claim elements
add significantly more
than the abstract idea?
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 26
CONFUSED?
(Most are)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 27
Here’s What We Know
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 28
1It’s brutal out there for
software patent owners
Post Alice Federal Circuit
decisions related to software
patentability:
(It’s worse at the district court)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 29
2
Fundamental economic
and financial processes
are abstract
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, 134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 30
3Data structures are
probably abstract
Content Extraction v. Wells Fargo, 776 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 31
4
Traditional ways of
doing business are
abstract
Ultramercial v. Hulu, 772 F.3d 709 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 32
5
If it can be done with a
pencil and paper, it’s
abstract
Synopsys v. Mentor Graphics, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6333 (N.D.
Cal. Jan 20, 2015)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 33
6
Computer automation
will not overcome an
abstract idea
Synopsys v. Mentor Graphics, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6333 (N.D.
Cal. Jan 20, 2015)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 34
7
Using typical building
blocks will not
overcome abstract idea
Open Text v. Box, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6309 (N.D. Cal.
Jan 20, 2015)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 35
What Software Developers
Can Do To Protect IP
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 36
1
Focus on claims that
solve technology
problems
DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com, 773 F.3d 1245 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 37
2
Highlight counter-
intuitive uses of known
technologies
DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com, 773 F.3d 1245 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 38
3
Incorporate hardware
elements into your
software claims
Bascom Research v. LinkedIn, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4606 (N.D.
Cal. Jan. 2, 2015)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 39
4
Be detailed in your
specification and
claims
HP v. ServiceNow, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29384 (N.D. Cal. Mar.
10, 2015)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 40
5
Keep focus on
specialized algorithms
and data structures
HP v. ServiceNow, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29384 (N.D. Cal. Mar.
10, 2015)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 41
6 Do not forget about
copyright
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 42
7
Consider choosing to
protect software as a
trade secret
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 43
Defending the Castle
NEW TOOLS
AND NEW
APPROACHES
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 44
1
New USPTO PGRs Have
Reshaped Joint
Defense Strategy
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 45
2
Greater Opportunity to
Distribute Prior Art
Search
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 46
3
Early and Sustained
Coordination Is
Essential
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 47
4
But Knowing When To
Go It Alone Can Be
Critical To Success
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 48
Key Developments in
Trademark Law
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 49
1
Deceptive Adverting
Claims Not Limited To
Direct Competitors
Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., 134 S. Ct.
1377, 1395 (2014)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 50
2
The Demise of the
Presumption of
Irreparable Harm
Ferring Pharms., Inc. v. Watson Pharms., Inc., 765 F.3d 205, 215
(3d Cir. 2014)
Herb Reed Enters., LLC v. Fla. Entm't Mgmt., Inc., 736 F.3d 1239,
1249 (9th Cir. 2013)
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 51
3
Offering Service
Insufficient for “Used in
Commerce”
Couture v. Playdom, Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 3135 (Fed. Cir.
2015).
© 2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 52
Seth A. Northrop
Silicon Valley
SNorthrop@robinskaplan.com
650.784.4012

IP Developments for the New Media and Gaming Industry

  • 1.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP Focus on Intellectual Property for New Media Taking Stock in Developing IP Law
  • 2.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 2 1 Copyright 2 Rights of Publicity 3 Patents 4 Trademark
  • 3.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 3 Key Developments in Copyright Law
  • 4.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 4 Calling Balls and Strikes FAIR USE DECISIONS
  • 5.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 5 1DVRs Okay, Copying to Remove Ads Not Fox Broad. Co. v. Dish Network, LLC, No. 2:12-cv-04529-DMG- SH (C.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2015)
  • 6.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 6 2 Digital Reproductions of Images Okay to Sell Physical Products Rosen v. eBay, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-06801-MWF-E (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2015)
  • 7.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 7 3 Reproducing Photos on Commercial Social Media Page Iffy N. Jersey Media Grp., Inc. v. Pirro, No.1:13-cv-07153-ER (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2015)
  • 8.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 8 4Indexing Video and Providing Clips Okay Fox News Network, LLC v. TVEyes, Inc., No. 1:13-cv-05315-AKH (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 9, 2014)
  • 9.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 9 5 Limited Recreation and Use of Film Scenes Okay Arrow Prods., Ltd. v. The Weinstein Co., LLC, No. 1:13-cv-05488- TPG (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2014)
  • 10.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 10 6 Artistic Recreation of Photograph for T-Shirt Okay Kienitz v. Sconnie Nation, LLC, 766 F.3d 756 (7th Cir. 2014)
  • 11.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 11 7 Inclusion of Sculpture In Architectural Photos Okay Neri v. Monroe, No. 11-cv-429-slc (W.D. Wis. Feb. 26, 2014)
  • 12.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 12 8Digitizing and Indexing Books Okay Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google Inc., 954 F. Supp. 2d 282 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)
  • 13.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 13 Actor Expression COPYRIGHT IN PERFORMANCE Garcia v. Google, No. 12-57302 (9th Cir. May 18 2015) (en banc)
  • 14.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 14 Copyright in Code PROTECTING API INTERFACES Oracle v. Google, 750 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
  • 15.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 15 Short on Nutrition SHORT ON COPYRIGHT Gorski v. Gymboree Corp., No. 14-CV-01314 (N.D. Cal. July 16, 2014)
  • 16.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 16 Key Developments in Rights of Publicity Law
  • 17.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 17 1 Congratulating Celebrity in Ad Probably Not Okay Michael Jordan v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc, Case No. 12 1992 (7th Cir., Feb. 19, 2014)
  • 18.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 18 2 Selling Stylized Image of Historically Significant Figure Okay Rosa Parks and Raymond ParksInstitute for Self Development v. Target Corporation, No. 2:12-CV-817 (M.D. Ala. Feb. 9, 2015).
  • 19.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 19 3 Focus on Realistic Replication of Key Figures Not Okay Keller v. Elec. Arts, 724 F.3d 1268 (9th Cir. 2013) Davis v. Elec. Arts, No. 12-15737 (9th Cir. Jan. 6, 2015)
  • 20.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 20 4 Reproduction of Historically Significant Figures Okay Noriega v. Activision/Blizzard, No. BC 551747, Slip Op. (Sup. Ct. Cal. Oct. 27, 2014)
  • 21.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 21 Key Developments in Patent Law
  • 22.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 22 The New Reality For SOFTWARE PATENTABILITY
  • 23.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 23 The Supreme Court Changed Everything Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, 134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014)
  • 24.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 24 1 Is the claim directed to an abstract idea?
  • 25.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 25 2 Do the claim elements add significantly more than the abstract idea?
  • 26.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 26 CONFUSED? (Most are)
  • 27.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 27 Here’s What We Know
  • 28.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 28 1It’s brutal out there for software patent owners Post Alice Federal Circuit decisions related to software patentability: (It’s worse at the district court)
  • 29.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 29 2 Fundamental economic and financial processes are abstract Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, 134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014)
  • 30.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 30 3Data structures are probably abstract Content Extraction v. Wells Fargo, 776 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
  • 31.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 31 4 Traditional ways of doing business are abstract Ultramercial v. Hulu, 772 F.3d 709 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
  • 32.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 32 5 If it can be done with a pencil and paper, it’s abstract Synopsys v. Mentor Graphics, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6333 (N.D. Cal. Jan 20, 2015)
  • 33.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 33 6 Computer automation will not overcome an abstract idea Synopsys v. Mentor Graphics, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6333 (N.D. Cal. Jan 20, 2015)
  • 34.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 34 7 Using typical building blocks will not overcome abstract idea Open Text v. Box, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6309 (N.D. Cal. Jan 20, 2015)
  • 35.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 35 What Software Developers Can Do To Protect IP
  • 36.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 36 1 Focus on claims that solve technology problems DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com, 773 F.3d 1245 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
  • 37.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 37 2 Highlight counter- intuitive uses of known technologies DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com, 773 F.3d 1245 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
  • 38.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 38 3 Incorporate hardware elements into your software claims Bascom Research v. LinkedIn, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4606 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2015)
  • 39.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 39 4 Be detailed in your specification and claims HP v. ServiceNow, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29384 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2015)
  • 40.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 40 5 Keep focus on specialized algorithms and data structures HP v. ServiceNow, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29384 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2015)
  • 41.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 41 6 Do not forget about copyright
  • 42.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 42 7 Consider choosing to protect software as a trade secret
  • 43.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 43 Defending the Castle NEW TOOLS AND NEW APPROACHES
  • 44.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 44 1 New USPTO PGRs Have Reshaped Joint Defense Strategy
  • 45.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 45 2 Greater Opportunity to Distribute Prior Art Search
  • 46.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 46 3 Early and Sustained Coordination Is Essential
  • 47.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 47 4 But Knowing When To Go It Alone Can Be Critical To Success
  • 48.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 48 Key Developments in Trademark Law
  • 49.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 49 1 Deceptive Adverting Claims Not Limited To Direct Competitors Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 1377, 1395 (2014)
  • 50.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 50 2 The Demise of the Presumption of Irreparable Harm Ferring Pharms., Inc. v. Watson Pharms., Inc., 765 F.3d 205, 215 (3d Cir. 2014) Herb Reed Enters., LLC v. Fla. Entm't Mgmt., Inc., 736 F.3d 1239, 1249 (9th Cir. 2013)
  • 51.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 51 3 Offering Service Insufficient for “Used in Commerce” Couture v. Playdom, Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 3135 (Fed. Cir. 2015).
  • 52.
    © 2015 ROBINSKAPLAN LLP 52 Seth A. Northrop Silicon Valley SNorthrop@robinskaplan.com 650.784.4012