Spring 2017 PSYC 101 Annotated Bibliography Entry.docx Alternate Assignment
This assignment provides an opportunity for students to research a topic of interest on Memory or Learning You
Spring 2017 PSYC 101 Annotated Bibliography Entry.docx Alternate Assignment This assignment provides an opportunity for students to research a topic of interest on Memory
This document discusses different types of scientific literature and provides guidance on using a three pass approach to effectively review scientific papers. It outlines the types of scientific literature including journal articles, monographs, textbooks, and technical reports. It then describes the three pass approach which involves an initial observation pass to review bibliographic details and get an overview, a judgmental second pass to critically analyze figures and methodology, and an understanding third pass to comprehensively review the paper and critically assess the evidence and reasoning. The document provides tips for each pass and emphasizes organizing literature electronically for efficient analysis.
The document provides tips for effective reading, note-taking, and becoming a critical reader at the university level. It discusses strategies for smart, efficient reading like skimming, scanning, and selective reading. It emphasizes the importance of being a critical reader by questioning claims and looking for biases. The document also covers taking better notes through methods like outlining, using bullet points, and developing personal shorthand systems. It stresses reflecting on readings by summarizing knowledge gained and how ideas have changed.
In this assignment, you will research and locate a current journalssuserd93c47
This document provides guidelines for a term paper assignment on a course-related topic involving human resource administration. Students are instructed to research a current journal article on nursing leadership styles published within the last 5 years and write a 1-2 page summary of their findings. The summary should include paragraphs on the major points of the article, whether the leadership style is supported and why, and how the article relates to nursing practice. Students are also expected to complete a 6-8 page term paper on a topic of their choice related to compensation, benefits, job analysis, or other relevant topics. The paper will be graded on content, organization, creativity, and proper formatting based on the provided rubric.
Scientific Writing And Peer Review A Guide Hoey Queens Sep08John Hoey
This document provides guidance on various aspects of scientific writing and the peer review process. It discusses picking an appropriate journal, formatting your manuscript, responding to peer reviews, and improving writing style. The key points covered are choosing a journal based on your goals and the type of article, following the target journal's format and style, addressing reviewers' comments clearly in a revised submission, and aiming for concise and accessible writing.
The document provides guidance on writing an abstract. It states that an abstract should be one paragraph, 100-200 words, and summarize the key elements of the paper by answering what the topic and research question were, the main findings, and what the conclusions are. The abstract is distinct from the introduction in being shorter and only summarizing rather than providing context. Elements like citations, diagrams, and copied text from the paper should generally not be included in the abstract. The reference page should list all sources used in the paper in alphabetical order on a separate page using a consistent citation style.
The document provides instructions for writing a one-paragraph essay. It should include a main idea (topic sentence), supporting details for the main idea, transitions to guide the reader, and a closing statement. The essay is to be written in a single paragraph and include an introduction with a clear thesis, body paragraphs with evidence and examples to prove the thesis, and a conclusion that restates or expands on the main idea.
Assignment components the formal paper assignment is worth 35 honey690131
This document outlines the six parts of a formal paper assignment for an ethics course. It details the requirements and deadlines for: 1) proposing a topic, 2) completing a quiz on the paper instructions, 3) identifying stakeholders, 4) submitting an annotated bibliography of 10 peer-reviewed articles, 5) completing peer reviews of other students' papers, and 6) submitting the final paper. Technical parameters like formatting, length, and section headings are also specified. Checklists are provided to help students ensure their work meets the assignment criteria.
Spring 2017 PSYC 101 Annotated Bibliography Entry.docx Alternate Assignment This assignment provides an opportunity for students to research a topic of interest on Memory
This document discusses different types of scientific literature and provides guidance on using a three pass approach to effectively review scientific papers. It outlines the types of scientific literature including journal articles, monographs, textbooks, and technical reports. It then describes the three pass approach which involves an initial observation pass to review bibliographic details and get an overview, a judgmental second pass to critically analyze figures and methodology, and an understanding third pass to comprehensively review the paper and critically assess the evidence and reasoning. The document provides tips for each pass and emphasizes organizing literature electronically for efficient analysis.
The document provides tips for effective reading, note-taking, and becoming a critical reader at the university level. It discusses strategies for smart, efficient reading like skimming, scanning, and selective reading. It emphasizes the importance of being a critical reader by questioning claims and looking for biases. The document also covers taking better notes through methods like outlining, using bullet points, and developing personal shorthand systems. It stresses reflecting on readings by summarizing knowledge gained and how ideas have changed.
In this assignment, you will research and locate a current journalssuserd93c47
This document provides guidelines for a term paper assignment on a course-related topic involving human resource administration. Students are instructed to research a current journal article on nursing leadership styles published within the last 5 years and write a 1-2 page summary of their findings. The summary should include paragraphs on the major points of the article, whether the leadership style is supported and why, and how the article relates to nursing practice. Students are also expected to complete a 6-8 page term paper on a topic of their choice related to compensation, benefits, job analysis, or other relevant topics. The paper will be graded on content, organization, creativity, and proper formatting based on the provided rubric.
Scientific Writing And Peer Review A Guide Hoey Queens Sep08John Hoey
This document provides guidance on various aspects of scientific writing and the peer review process. It discusses picking an appropriate journal, formatting your manuscript, responding to peer reviews, and improving writing style. The key points covered are choosing a journal based on your goals and the type of article, following the target journal's format and style, addressing reviewers' comments clearly in a revised submission, and aiming for concise and accessible writing.
The document provides guidance on writing an abstract. It states that an abstract should be one paragraph, 100-200 words, and summarize the key elements of the paper by answering what the topic and research question were, the main findings, and what the conclusions are. The abstract is distinct from the introduction in being shorter and only summarizing rather than providing context. Elements like citations, diagrams, and copied text from the paper should generally not be included in the abstract. The reference page should list all sources used in the paper in alphabetical order on a separate page using a consistent citation style.
The document provides instructions for writing a one-paragraph essay. It should include a main idea (topic sentence), supporting details for the main idea, transitions to guide the reader, and a closing statement. The essay is to be written in a single paragraph and include an introduction with a clear thesis, body paragraphs with evidence and examples to prove the thesis, and a conclusion that restates or expands on the main idea.
Assignment components the formal paper assignment is worth 35 honey690131
This document outlines the six parts of a formal paper assignment for an ethics course. It details the requirements and deadlines for: 1) proposing a topic, 2) completing a quiz on the paper instructions, 3) identifying stakeholders, 4) submitting an annotated bibliography of 10 peer-reviewed articles, 5) completing peer reviews of other students' papers, and 6) submitting the final paper. Technical parameters like formatting, length, and section headings are also specified. Checklists are provided to help students ensure their work meets the assignment criteria.
This document describes the differences between paraphrasing and summarizing and provides guidance on how to properly do each. Paraphrasing rewrites information in one's own words while maintaining the original meaning. Summarizing concisely outlines the key points and main idea, using far fewer words than the original. The document advises using synonyms and passive voice when paraphrasing, and focusing on clarity and capturing the author's certainty when summarizing. It warns against patchwriting, changing only a few words, or just rearranging sentences without truly putting the information in one's own words.
Basic requirements type of writing expected comparisonhoney690131
The document provides guidelines for writing a comparison/contrast essay on two famous historical figures. The essay should be no more than two pages, double-spaced in 12-point Times New Roman font using MLA formatting and citations. Students should compare and contrast the figures' backgrounds, achievements, and public perceptions while appealing to the reader's emotions and using analytical skills. The evaluation criteria focus on rhetorical structure, audience appeal, openings and conclusions, formal style, comparison incorporation, and introduction quality.
This document provides information on conducting academic research and identifying appropriate sources. It discusses the differences between primary and secondary research sources, as well as academic versus popular sources. Academic sources are described as authoritative, sourced, peer-reviewed, and objective, while being written for other academics. Popular sources are often written for a general audience in easily understood language without full citations. The document also provides examples of reputable sources for different subject areas and search tips for online research, including using keywords, synonyms, and Boolean operators to effectively search databases and search engines.
Touchstone 3 presenting a research plan scenario yourraju957290
This document provides instructions for students to develop a research plan on diversity or collaboration in a community group. It outlines the requirements for creating 8-11 notecards summarizing the research plan. The notecards must include: an introduction, research question, 4-6 literature review cards, a hypothesis card, optional operational definitions card, and a research method card. Students are instructed to refine their research question and bibliography from the previous assignment, complete a literature review with notes on sources, formulate a hypothesis and choose a research method, and incorporate these elements into the notecards.
Last name 1 last name 1namemy nameclassdatethssuserd93c47
The document discusses outlining a term paper in three parts:
I. Developing the outline, including reviewing the assignment, choosing a topic, doing research, developing the topic, and writing a thesis statement.
II. Outlining the paper by writing topic sentences, organizing paragraphs with Roman numerals and subpoints with letters and numbers, and filling in the outline.
III. Revising the outline by reverse outlining the first draft, examining the logical flow, rearranging paragraphs physically, and revising the outline and paper.
The document discusses critical analysis, including defining it as looking at topics from different perspectives, considering context, and evaluating evidence rather than making immediate judgments. It provides examples of applying critical thinking skills like analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The document emphasizes that critical thinking is an important part of university work and various academic activities require applying these skills.
The document discusses in-text citations and plagiarism. It defines plagiarism and different types of plagiarism. It also discusses referencing systems, integral vs non-integral citations, reporting verbs and tense, and using plagiarism software. The document also discusses critical reading versus critical writing and provides tips for writing critically such as comparing theories and indicating your own position. It distinguishes between arguments of discovery and advocacy.
Rothman discourse essay prompt context when yaryan532920
This document provides context and instructions for a discourse essay assignment. The goals of the essay are to: 1) Interpret and portray crucial perspectives from sources on the research topic; 2) Present and evaluate those perspectives; and 3) Outline what the author wants to add to the discussion and how it responds to existing ideas. The essay should demonstrate understanding of prior discussions around the research focus, clarify how that informs the author's thinking, and identify planned contributions in dialogue with other works. The essay must be 4-5 pages, cite at least six total sources with four from academic works, and be formatted with APA style citations and a references page. It is due by the specified date.
This document provides examples of different classroom assessment techniques (CATs) that can be used in a one-shot library instruction session to assess student learning. It describes several CATs, including the one sentence summary, defining features matrix, directed paraphrasing, pro/con grid, what's the principle/tool, 1-minute paper/muddiest point, and misconception/preconception check. For each CAT, it provides a brief explanation of how it can be used and examples of questions or prompts for that CAT. These CATs allow instructors to check student understanding and gather feedback during and after a one-shot session in a quick and low-stakes way.
The research report topic cyber security and artificial intelligeSALU18
This document provides guidelines for a research report on cyber security and artificial intelligence. It specifies that the report must be at least 3,500 words with a minimum of four peer-reviewed citations. The report should have five chapters that cover an introduction, literature review, methodology, findings and results, and conclusions. The document also provides formatting requirements including margins, line spacing, page numbering, and required sections for each chapter. Students are warned against plagiarism and told that only peer-reviewed sources can be cited.
This document outlines the difference between paraphrasing and summarizing and provides guidance on how to do each effectively. Paraphrasing rewrites information in one's own words while maintaining the original meaning, often using synonyms and passive voice. Summarizing concisely captures the main idea and key points in fewer words than the original. Both require maintaining the original meaning and certainty while changing most of the words. Students should practice paraphrasing and rewriting summaries to avoid directly copying or "patchworking" from sources.
Use the writing process steps to develop a well written cause and efraju957290
The document outlines the steps to develop a well-written cause and effect paragraph, including prewriting, planning, drafting, and polishing. It emphasizes using the writing process, maintaining unity, support and coherence, and following guidelines for paragraph length and formatting. Key aspects are choosing a topic, gathering thoughts on causes or effects, creating an outline organized by importance, writing a first draft, and proofreading for errors.
The document provides guidance on summarizing a research project in 3 sections: research question, findings, and generalizations. It advises including the aims of the project, description of the method used to collect and analyze data, and the findings or generalizations revealed from the research. Examples are given for effective organization of summaries, interpretation of data, and making inferences to strengthen conclusions.
This document provides instructions for a Malaysian Studies assignment. Students must choose a topic related to Malaysian Studies and write a paper between 2 to 10 pages. The paper should include an introduction, content, and conclusion as well as references. Students will be evaluated based on the elaboration of points, argument, structure, and format. Points will be awarded for thoroughly discussing topics, critically analyzing issues from different perspectives, and following the assigned structure and format. The assignment is due on July 12th 2013 and can be completed individually or in a group.
The document provides guidance on using direct quotations in academic writing. It states that direct quotations should be used sparingly and only to support an argument. According to the Princeton Writing Centre, direct quotes are appropriate when readers need to see the original language. However, students often overuse quotes, which can make their writing seem unsupported. The document outlines rules for integrating short and long quotes and modifying quotations while maintaining integrity. Students must learn technical skills like formatting and punctuation to use quotes properly.
Writing an academic essay involves structuring a coherent argument and presenting ideas in a logical order. A typical essay introduces the argument, analyzes evidence, considers counterarguments, and concludes. Different types of information like background context are often located in specialized sections. Successful essays anticipate questions readers may have like "what evidence supports the thesis?", "how does the thesis address counterarguments?", and "why does this matter?". Answering these questions fully helps structure the essay and ensure the argument has significance for readers.
Learning resources note to access this module’s required librassuserd93c47
The document provides learning resources for a course module, including required readings from textbooks and peer-reviewed journal articles that can be accessed through the university library databases. Students are instructed to read a chapter on patient concerns, choices and clinical judgment in evidence-based practice, as well as several journal articles on topics like shared decision-making, return on investment for professional development, and using decision aids to facilitate patient choices. One article is from a website providing information on patient decision aids.
Threat modeling a new medium sized health care facility just operaju957290
The CEO of a new medium-sized healthcare facility has tasked the CIO with creating a threat model and recommending one of three options. The CIO is to research threat models in healthcare and summarize three in a paper, choosing one to recommend and justifying the choice. The paper must discuss three common security risks rated as low, medium, or high, user authentication with third parties, and include a UML diagram without copying from online. It should be 4-6 pages following APA guidelines, cite at least two scholarly sources to support positions, and have high-quality writing. The purpose is to logically argue a position on a problem or issue in healthcare security, not simply describe topics.
Name ________________________rhetorical analysis rubric_mramit657720
This document outlines guidelines and a rubric for a cultural research assignment. Students will research a specific culture assigned to them and write a four page paper following the provided outline, which includes sections on cultural art, food, customs, climate, population, landmarks, and economy. Papers must be in APA format, include 4 scholarly sources no older than 7 years, and be submitted through Turnitin. The provided rubric evaluates students on their use of APA format, introduction, inclusion of the required sections with at least 5 sentences each, and overall organization, grammar, and mechanics.
This document provides an outline for teaching students about expository essays. It begins with defining key elements such as thesis statements, topic sentences, and outlines. It then provides examples of effective and ineffective thesis statements. The document outlines the structure of an expository essay, including introductory, body, and concluding paragraphs. It emphasizes using topic sentences, evidence, and transitions in body paragraphs. Overall, the document serves as a guide for students to understand how to develop and structure an expository essay.
Methodology ProjectThis project will be completed in steps wi.docxbuffydtesurina
This document outlines the steps and requirements for a methodology project. It will involve writing an annotated bibliography, developing hypotheses, operationalizing variables, creating survey questions, and designing an interview guide. The project will be completed in stages with specific guidelines for each deliverable. The annotated bibliography must summarize five scholarly sources based on their hypotheses and major findings. Later steps will involve stating hypotheses, defining variables, designing survey questions related to the hypotheses, and proposing an interview guide and research questions for a qualitative approach.
This document outlines an assignment for students to complete an incident analysis project. It provides instructions for two parts: 1) describing a writing-related incident and 2) creating a project plan based on that incident. For part 1, students are asked to describe an experience with writing that interests or troubles them in 750-1000 words. For part 2, they must identify a topic, potential research questions, and significance of studying the topic. The document provides guidance on drafting each part and establishing a timeline for rough and final drafts. It emphasizes using details to describe the incident and connecting the incident clearly to the proposed research topic.
This document describes the differences between paraphrasing and summarizing and provides guidance on how to properly do each. Paraphrasing rewrites information in one's own words while maintaining the original meaning. Summarizing concisely outlines the key points and main idea, using far fewer words than the original. The document advises using synonyms and passive voice when paraphrasing, and focusing on clarity and capturing the author's certainty when summarizing. It warns against patchwriting, changing only a few words, or just rearranging sentences without truly putting the information in one's own words.
Basic requirements type of writing expected comparisonhoney690131
The document provides guidelines for writing a comparison/contrast essay on two famous historical figures. The essay should be no more than two pages, double-spaced in 12-point Times New Roman font using MLA formatting and citations. Students should compare and contrast the figures' backgrounds, achievements, and public perceptions while appealing to the reader's emotions and using analytical skills. The evaluation criteria focus on rhetorical structure, audience appeal, openings and conclusions, formal style, comparison incorporation, and introduction quality.
This document provides information on conducting academic research and identifying appropriate sources. It discusses the differences between primary and secondary research sources, as well as academic versus popular sources. Academic sources are described as authoritative, sourced, peer-reviewed, and objective, while being written for other academics. Popular sources are often written for a general audience in easily understood language without full citations. The document also provides examples of reputable sources for different subject areas and search tips for online research, including using keywords, synonyms, and Boolean operators to effectively search databases and search engines.
Touchstone 3 presenting a research plan scenario yourraju957290
This document provides instructions for students to develop a research plan on diversity or collaboration in a community group. It outlines the requirements for creating 8-11 notecards summarizing the research plan. The notecards must include: an introduction, research question, 4-6 literature review cards, a hypothesis card, optional operational definitions card, and a research method card. Students are instructed to refine their research question and bibliography from the previous assignment, complete a literature review with notes on sources, formulate a hypothesis and choose a research method, and incorporate these elements into the notecards.
Last name 1 last name 1namemy nameclassdatethssuserd93c47
The document discusses outlining a term paper in three parts:
I. Developing the outline, including reviewing the assignment, choosing a topic, doing research, developing the topic, and writing a thesis statement.
II. Outlining the paper by writing topic sentences, organizing paragraphs with Roman numerals and subpoints with letters and numbers, and filling in the outline.
III. Revising the outline by reverse outlining the first draft, examining the logical flow, rearranging paragraphs physically, and revising the outline and paper.
The document discusses critical analysis, including defining it as looking at topics from different perspectives, considering context, and evaluating evidence rather than making immediate judgments. It provides examples of applying critical thinking skills like analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The document emphasizes that critical thinking is an important part of university work and various academic activities require applying these skills.
The document discusses in-text citations and plagiarism. It defines plagiarism and different types of plagiarism. It also discusses referencing systems, integral vs non-integral citations, reporting verbs and tense, and using plagiarism software. The document also discusses critical reading versus critical writing and provides tips for writing critically such as comparing theories and indicating your own position. It distinguishes between arguments of discovery and advocacy.
Rothman discourse essay prompt context when yaryan532920
This document provides context and instructions for a discourse essay assignment. The goals of the essay are to: 1) Interpret and portray crucial perspectives from sources on the research topic; 2) Present and evaluate those perspectives; and 3) Outline what the author wants to add to the discussion and how it responds to existing ideas. The essay should demonstrate understanding of prior discussions around the research focus, clarify how that informs the author's thinking, and identify planned contributions in dialogue with other works. The essay must be 4-5 pages, cite at least six total sources with four from academic works, and be formatted with APA style citations and a references page. It is due by the specified date.
This document provides examples of different classroom assessment techniques (CATs) that can be used in a one-shot library instruction session to assess student learning. It describes several CATs, including the one sentence summary, defining features matrix, directed paraphrasing, pro/con grid, what's the principle/tool, 1-minute paper/muddiest point, and misconception/preconception check. For each CAT, it provides a brief explanation of how it can be used and examples of questions or prompts for that CAT. These CATs allow instructors to check student understanding and gather feedback during and after a one-shot session in a quick and low-stakes way.
The research report topic cyber security and artificial intelligeSALU18
This document provides guidelines for a research report on cyber security and artificial intelligence. It specifies that the report must be at least 3,500 words with a minimum of four peer-reviewed citations. The report should have five chapters that cover an introduction, literature review, methodology, findings and results, and conclusions. The document also provides formatting requirements including margins, line spacing, page numbering, and required sections for each chapter. Students are warned against plagiarism and told that only peer-reviewed sources can be cited.
This document outlines the difference between paraphrasing and summarizing and provides guidance on how to do each effectively. Paraphrasing rewrites information in one's own words while maintaining the original meaning, often using synonyms and passive voice. Summarizing concisely captures the main idea and key points in fewer words than the original. Both require maintaining the original meaning and certainty while changing most of the words. Students should practice paraphrasing and rewriting summaries to avoid directly copying or "patchworking" from sources.
Use the writing process steps to develop a well written cause and efraju957290
The document outlines the steps to develop a well-written cause and effect paragraph, including prewriting, planning, drafting, and polishing. It emphasizes using the writing process, maintaining unity, support and coherence, and following guidelines for paragraph length and formatting. Key aspects are choosing a topic, gathering thoughts on causes or effects, creating an outline organized by importance, writing a first draft, and proofreading for errors.
The document provides guidance on summarizing a research project in 3 sections: research question, findings, and generalizations. It advises including the aims of the project, description of the method used to collect and analyze data, and the findings or generalizations revealed from the research. Examples are given for effective organization of summaries, interpretation of data, and making inferences to strengthen conclusions.
This document provides instructions for a Malaysian Studies assignment. Students must choose a topic related to Malaysian Studies and write a paper between 2 to 10 pages. The paper should include an introduction, content, and conclusion as well as references. Students will be evaluated based on the elaboration of points, argument, structure, and format. Points will be awarded for thoroughly discussing topics, critically analyzing issues from different perspectives, and following the assigned structure and format. The assignment is due on July 12th 2013 and can be completed individually or in a group.
The document provides guidance on using direct quotations in academic writing. It states that direct quotations should be used sparingly and only to support an argument. According to the Princeton Writing Centre, direct quotes are appropriate when readers need to see the original language. However, students often overuse quotes, which can make their writing seem unsupported. The document outlines rules for integrating short and long quotes and modifying quotations while maintaining integrity. Students must learn technical skills like formatting and punctuation to use quotes properly.
Writing an academic essay involves structuring a coherent argument and presenting ideas in a logical order. A typical essay introduces the argument, analyzes evidence, considers counterarguments, and concludes. Different types of information like background context are often located in specialized sections. Successful essays anticipate questions readers may have like "what evidence supports the thesis?", "how does the thesis address counterarguments?", and "why does this matter?". Answering these questions fully helps structure the essay and ensure the argument has significance for readers.
Learning resources note to access this module’s required librassuserd93c47
The document provides learning resources for a course module, including required readings from textbooks and peer-reviewed journal articles that can be accessed through the university library databases. Students are instructed to read a chapter on patient concerns, choices and clinical judgment in evidence-based practice, as well as several journal articles on topics like shared decision-making, return on investment for professional development, and using decision aids to facilitate patient choices. One article is from a website providing information on patient decision aids.
Threat modeling a new medium sized health care facility just operaju957290
The CEO of a new medium-sized healthcare facility has tasked the CIO with creating a threat model and recommending one of three options. The CIO is to research threat models in healthcare and summarize three in a paper, choosing one to recommend and justifying the choice. The paper must discuss three common security risks rated as low, medium, or high, user authentication with third parties, and include a UML diagram without copying from online. It should be 4-6 pages following APA guidelines, cite at least two scholarly sources to support positions, and have high-quality writing. The purpose is to logically argue a position on a problem or issue in healthcare security, not simply describe topics.
Name ________________________rhetorical analysis rubric_mramit657720
This document outlines guidelines and a rubric for a cultural research assignment. Students will research a specific culture assigned to them and write a four page paper following the provided outline, which includes sections on cultural art, food, customs, climate, population, landmarks, and economy. Papers must be in APA format, include 4 scholarly sources no older than 7 years, and be submitted through Turnitin. The provided rubric evaluates students on their use of APA format, introduction, inclusion of the required sections with at least 5 sentences each, and overall organization, grammar, and mechanics.
This document provides an outline for teaching students about expository essays. It begins with defining key elements such as thesis statements, topic sentences, and outlines. It then provides examples of effective and ineffective thesis statements. The document outlines the structure of an expository essay, including introductory, body, and concluding paragraphs. It emphasizes using topic sentences, evidence, and transitions in body paragraphs. Overall, the document serves as a guide for students to understand how to develop and structure an expository essay.
Methodology ProjectThis project will be completed in steps wi.docxbuffydtesurina
This document outlines the steps and requirements for a methodology project. It will involve writing an annotated bibliography, developing hypotheses, operationalizing variables, creating survey questions, and designing an interview guide. The project will be completed in stages with specific guidelines for each deliverable. The annotated bibliography must summarize five scholarly sources based on their hypotheses and major findings. Later steps will involve stating hypotheses, defining variables, designing survey questions related to the hypotheses, and proposing an interview guide and research questions for a qualitative approach.
This document outlines an assignment for students to complete an incident analysis project. It provides instructions for two parts: 1) describing a writing-related incident and 2) creating a project plan based on that incident. For part 1, students are asked to describe an experience with writing that interests or troubles them in 750-1000 words. For part 2, they must identify a topic, potential research questions, and significance of studying the topic. The document provides guidance on drafting each part and establishing a timeline for rough and final drafts. It emphasizes using details to describe the incident and connecting the incident clearly to the proposed research topic.
WRITING 4.0: Documented Inquiry Project: Novel Analysis
English 1302
Spring 2015
Synopsis of the Task.
As noted on the assignment sheet for Writing #3.0, your fourth project of the term is your
documented study: a paper that centers on a question worthy of academic research. This
particular paper will focus on analysis of a novel that you selected. The paper will be six to
eight pages (double spaced) long, not counting the abstract, annotated bibliography, (see
“Ancillaries” below) or your works cited page.
There is no one way you are required to analyze your novel, but the research paper must contain
some kind of analysis, and that analysis should be the focal point of paper. This analysis could
critical, evaluative, comparative, or some combination thereof. As long as it is analysis based on
evidence both from the text itself and outside academic sources, it will work for the paper. You
may wish to use one or more of the modes of literary criticism that we have discussed in class.
Keep in mind, plot synopsis may be part of the paper, but it can take up no more than a
paragraph in the paper if you use a dedicated plot synopsis section. Any paper that is mostly plot
synopsis, or simply a report of information gathered about the novel, can receive a grade no
higher than a 70.
Ancillaries.
Besides the text itself, you will create an annotated bibliography based on the tentative list
of works to be used you wrote for Writing 3.0, and you will also create an abstract, which
should be about one paragraph in length. The rough drafts of the annotated bibliography and
the abstract will be revised into a final draft for this paper. The annotated bibliography
and abstract are required parts of this assignment.
Other things will also be due along the way the rest of the semester: notes for me to check,
revisions, and an oral presentation of your final paper to the class. Each of these is part of the
entire assignment; without them, your final grade for Writing 4.0 will suffer.
Format.
The paper should be typed or word-processed, double spaced, and can include headings. For any
other questions about using tables or surveys, please consult the writing center, any of the MLA
help websites we have discussed, our textbooks, or myself. Page numbers are required for
this paper, and should be placed in the upper right hand corner of each page.
Documentation and Sources.
Once again, MLA will be the citation system that you use for this assignment. As far as numbers
of sources to consider for a paper of this length, 6-8 reputable, academic sources would be
appropriate. Direct use of Wikipedia as a source will not be permitted. Sites such as
About.com, Sparknotes, Shmoop, and other “homework/study” sites will not be permitted.
General dictionaries and encyclopedias will also not be permitted.
Copies of Quoted and Paraphrased Pages.
When you turn in the f.
SOCI 403 Social ChangeAmerican Public University SystemWri.docxjensgosney
SOCI 403 Social Change
American Public University System
Written Assignment Four: Final Paper (Due Week 8)
IMPORTANT NOTE: This assignment is due in Week 8 to give you ample time to explore our class topics and create a thorough and informed paper. It must be turned in by 11:55 pm (EST) on Sunday of Week 8. Because this is the end of class, NO EXTENSIONS can be given for this paper. When class ends, all assignments must be in! Please plan your time carefully and turn this paper in early if at all possible.
In this assignment, you will construct a 10-12 page final research paper. Your paper should utilize sound critical thought and it should provide appropriate APA in-text citations and APA full-reference citations. The overall assignment is worth 20% of your final course grade. Be sure to read the directions for Submitting the Assignment.
Your paper will adhere to the general standards of the APA-formatting guidelines. It will include a title page, a short abstract, body of paper (Introduction/Thesis, Analysis, Application of Research, Summary and Conclusion) and a reference page. Comment by mothertao: Where the APA guidelines and the rules of this assignment diverge, stick to the rules of the assignment.
The Purdue Online Writing Lab offers information about APA guidelines and formatting:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
This site offers you answers to the most frequently asked questions on APA style as well as other useful APA information:
http://www.apastyle.org/learn/faqs/index.aspx
ALL Written assignments (i.e. Your Paper assignments) must be submitted TWICE: 1) Through the Sakai assignment submission link, and 2) Through www.turnitin.com. See Turnitin.com Directions
Format, Length and Content of Paper:
Title (First whole page of paper)
Abstract (Separate page)
Body of Paper: (10 -12 pages total) Clearly mark each part of the body of your paper with the following four section headings. Watch the page requirements carefully as you will be graded on them.
I. Introduction and Thesis Questions/Statement (1 page):
Introduce your topic and explain its relevance to you personally. Summarize the significance of this topic for others (e.g., the reader, groups, society). Describe the research questions that will guide your inquiry or the thesis statement that you will explore.
II. Analysis Using Concepts/Theories (2 – 3 pages):
Clearly and significantly apply at least five concepts/theories from our text to your research topic. While this sounds like what you did in Assignment One, this is no longer an exploration of how these might apply. Rather, these applications should be strong and well-supported in the final draft.
III. Application of Research (6 - 7 pages):
Clearly and significantly apply findings from at least 8 meaningful, up-to-date resources, 5 of which are from reputable academic journals. Your research in Assignment Two should help you with this, but remember that the final pape.
The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with the opportunity to select a topic in the particular area in which you have an occupational or research interest, and to complete a literature review of the topic, using a minimum of ten scholarly references. This will allow you to demonstrate mastery of the program outcomes for the B.S. criminal justice program at University.
The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with the opportunity to select a topic in the particular area in which you have an occupational or research interest, and to complete a literature review of the topic, using a minimum of ten scholarly references. This will allow you to demonstrate mastery of the program outcomes for the B.S. criminal justice program at University.
Sheet1 your name hereadvertiser #1advertiser #2advertiser #3advertrock73
The document provides instructions for a research paper assignment on the theme of human behavior. Students must write a 6-8 page paper that presents a problem or issue related to human behavior, conducts research to answer questions about the topic, and develops an argument supported by sources. The assignment includes a proposal, annotated bibliography, outline, drafts, and final paper. It also provides a grading rubric that evaluates elements such as the thesis, organization, argument development, research, source integration, and writing mechanics.
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review outline. It discusses including an introduction that orients the reader to the topic. The main body should include a critical analysis and synthesis of prior research on the topic. It should lead to the research questions being explored. Sections within the outline include summarizing sources, developing arguments, and concluding by relating back to the introduction and topic. The document emphasizes narrowing research, taking detailed notes, assessing sources, and thoroughly editing the outline.
Summary Exercise InstructionsFor this assignment only, there is .docxpicklesvalery
This document provides instructions for an assignment to summarize a source related to the student's research topic. It outlines two options - interviewing an expert from a relevant non-profit organization or summarizing an article from a credible periodical. For either option, the summary must include an introduction with background on the source, 3 body paragraphs summarizing the source's key points, and a conclusion explaining how the source informs the student's research topic. The assignment requires a 1-2 page double-spaced summary in MLA format with an underlined thesis statement.
Select a topic to research. For your research, you must use Google.docxbagotjesusa
Select a topic to research. For your research, you must use Google Scholar or another reputable site. Use Lecture 2 for a description of what is considered a scholarly article. Use APA formatting style for references. Create a title page and a reference list with 10 references from the last 5 years. Include the permalink for each reference. Include the following types of references:
1. Book
2. Journal articles
3. Website
4. Dissertation/thesis from a database
5. Streaming video
6. Book chapter
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
LECTURE 2
Introduction
Learning to communicate appropriately and effectively in a variety of settings and in a variety of formats is an important skill in both academic and professional environments. In an online learning environment, learning to communicate effectively through writing is particularly important because it is, by far, how the majority of communication occurs. Review the learning objectives for this module within the course syllabus and use the following lecture, which is about various forms of written communication used in the online graduate setting, to accomplish them.
Paraphrasing
Paraphrasing the ideas of others is a requirement in academic writing and graduate study. Paraphrasing is using your own words to restate ideas or information from a source material. Paraphrasing will help you grasp the full meaning of the source material and allow you to appropriately reference the source material to support your own ideas and academic writing. Paraphrased material is usually shorter and more concise than the original information. The following are some common guidelines taken from the Purdue Online Writing Lab (2012), which may assist you with learning to paraphrase information gathered from reading materials for use in completing your coursework.
Reread the original passage until you understand its full meaning.
Set the original passage aside and, on a note card, write what you think the passage means in your own words (paraphrase).
Jot down a few words below your paraphrase to remind you later of how you plan to use the information. At the top of the note card, write a key word or phrase to indicate the subject of your paraphrase.
Compare your paraphrase with the original to make sure that your version accurately expresses all the essential information.
Use quotation marks to identify any unique term or phrase you copied exactly from the original source.
Record the source (including the page) on your note card so that you can cite it easily if you decide to incorporate the material into a paper or discussion question response.
The following is an example of paraphrasing (Purdue OWL, 2012), which i.
BUS 210 Project One Management Brief Text-Only VersionOrganizatiVannaSchrader3
BUS 210 Project One Management Brief Text-Only Version
Organizational chart of the SNHU Pet Supply Company’s organizational structure. The outline is as follows:
1. CEO
a. VP Manchester
i. Human Resources
ii. Information Technology
iii. Toys
1. Product Development
2. Merchandising
3. Marketing
4. Sales
5. Supply Chain
6. Retail Operation
iv. Food
1. Product Development
2. Merchandising
3. Marketing
4. Sales
5. Supply Chain
6. Retail Operation
v. Supplies
1. Product Development
2. Merchandising
3. Marketing
4. Sales
5. Supply Chain
6. Retail Operation
b. VP Denver
i. Human Resources
ii. Information Technology
iii. Toys
1. Product Development
2. Merchandising
3. Marketing
4. Sales
5. Supply Chain
6. Retail Operation
iv. Food
1. Product Development
2. Merchandising
3. Marketing
4. Sales
5. Supply Chain
6. Retail Operation
v. Supplies
1. Product Development
2. Merchandising
3. Marketing
4. Sales
5. Supply Chain
6. Retail Operation
Written Assignment RubricRubric for Final ProjectCriterionExceptionalProficientMarginalUnacceptableIntroductionYou effectively establish the context and purpose of the paper.You adequately establish the context and purpose of the paper.You miminally establish the context and purpose of the paper.You ineffectively establish the context and purpose of the paper.Thesis statementYour thesis statement is exceptionally lucid and concise; it effectively explains to the reader what he or she should expect from the paper.Your thesis statement is clearly stated and reasonably concise; it provides the reader a with a coherent preview of the paper.Your thesis statement lacks clarity or is overly complex or wordy; it only partially prepares the reader for the rest of the paper.Your assignment lacks a thesis statement, or the statement is inadequate or incomprehensible.Content developmentYou use carefully chosen, authoritative, and compelling content that demonstrates mastery of the subject; provide an advanced and thoughtful analysis of ideas; present an in-depth synthesis of ideas demonstrating insight and interpretation; and include meticulous references to readings wherever necessary.You use appropriate and relevant content that demonstrates sufficient command of the subject; provide a germane analysis of ideas; and include references to readings.You use somewhat appropriate content that demonstrates limited command of the subject; provide a cursory analysis of ideas that lacks insight and interpretation; and include minimal references to readings.You use inappropriate and irrelevant content, provide little, if any, analysis, and do not include references to readings.ConclusionsYou offer a clear answer to your research question and articulate related outcomes (consequences and implications) through careful reasoning and informed evaluation.You offer a sufficient answer to your research question and state outcomes (consequences and implications) satisfactorily.You offer a weak answer to your research question and state outcomes ( ...
Communication in the Workplace
Communication Analysis Essay and Discussion Assignment
Reference: Chapters 1 - 6
Instructions:
SELECT a topic from the sample choices. Read and analyze. Using your textbook for support!
FORMAT with the following WRITING GUIDELINES:
1. Typed 12 point font, Times New Roman
1. Double spaced, page length will vary (approximately 3 pages)
1. Stapled upper left-hand corner
1. Information used from our textbook or outside sources should be noted in-text in APA or MLA format along with either a Reference or Works Cited page.
HINTS:
1. If you use a direct quote, place quotation marks and in-text cite.
1. If you summarize someone’s knowledge and use your own words, and in-text cite it.
1. If you are in doubt, cite it!!!!!
1. Remember the 80/20 rule: 80% of your essay response should always be your thoughts/words and 20% directly quoted. BUT REMEMBER, JUST BECAUSE YOU PUT IT IN YOUR OWN WORDS DOES NOT MEAN IT IS YOURS. YOU MUST GIVE CREDIT FOR THE IDEA! Cite, cite, cite, cite, cite!
1. OWL PURDUE WRITING LAB is a wonderful resource and reminder of these tips and more. Check it out!
1. Visit the ECU Writing Center for help with sources, organization and error check. If you are unsure about using sources correctly, seek help! Plagiarism is unacceptable.
ON DUE DATE:
1. Upload your Communication Essay to Safe Assign on Blackboard link provided before you attend class on the due date. Be prepared to discuss/present a brief 3-4 minute oral summary of your essay utilizing your essay as a reference before a small group of your classmates. You may bring your essay or notes to help you with this discussion/presentation.
EVALUATION:
Your grade on this assignment will be based on your written and discussion response. Each area is worth 25 points for a total of 100. Each of the 4 areas will be assessed as either Excellent, Competent, Needs Improvement.
Area 1: Adherence to WRITING GUIDELINES
Area 2: Style: grammar/punctuation/readability
Area 3: Organization/ Supporting examples and terminology utilized from the textbook for support
Area 4: Presentation individual summary-group discussion; Active participant/listener- group discussion
*****************************************************************************
CHOICES! (In each choice, make sure that you search for a RECENT article. This means within the past 6-12 months.)
*****************************************************************************
Email and text messages are not always the most appropriate channel for a particular message. Think of a specific instance in your life where you used IM or e-mail and the message sent was not the message received.
· First, describe the kinds of problems caused by selecting this channel of communication? Could these problems been prevented by using a different channel for sending the message? Make sure to use the .
Similar to INTEREST ON MEMORY / TUTORIALOUTLET DOT COM (12)
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
INTEREST ON MEMORY / TUTORIALOUTLET DOT COM
1. Interest on Memory
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.tutorialoutlet.com
Spring 2017 PSYC 101 Annotated Bibliography Entry.docx Alternate
Assignment
This assignment provides an opportunity for students to research a
topic of interest on Memory or Learning You will not only gain
insight and information regarding the chosen topic, but an
understanding of the process of research and its methodology.
Total minimum words: 600-700 words (5 point deduction for no word
count; 5 point deduction for not following the proper paper format).
The steps for completing assignment: Annotated Bibliography-Article
Review
1.Choose an article that addresses a research area in psychology from
another country or a cross-cultural study.
Make sure that the article is considered aPRIMARY SOURCEand is
found in an academic journal ONLY.The author(s) must be the
researcher(s) reporting on a specific study and its results. A Primary
Source would include the following: a review of the literature, a
description of methodology including the sample selection process, a
description of the statistical analysis, and a discussion of the results.
You maynotuse an abstract instead of the complete article; not enough
detail will be provided.
After citing the reference information (see example) in APA format,
summarizein your own wordsthe content of the article in one to two
pages.DO NOT QUOTE!This is an exercise in paraphrasing. The
summary should include a synopsis of the study and the research
methodology, which includes information about the sample, the
specific methods used, and ends with the conclusions of the
researcher(s). You do not have to summarize the literature review.
2. Simply state the goal of this piece of research and how they went
about it. This summary shouldnotinclude personal opinions formed as
a result of the readings
Your annotated bibliography should answer the following questions:
Who did the study? What did they do? To whom did they do it?
How did they do it? What were the results?
The annotated bibliography should be typed, 12 font and double-
spaced throughout. Your summary should be inexactly the same
formas shown in the example at the end of the syllabus. The
document must also be submitted in a Word compatible document. Be
sure to save a copy on your hard drive or other disk, just in case of a
problem.
Please note there are two submission prompts for the Annotated
Bibliography assignment. You MUST submit Submission 1 papers
(by due date and at the beginning of class) to check your plagiarism
score. There is no magic number that is acceptable. Highlighted
phrases and lines are considered evidence of plagiarism. You may
use the initial Turnitin score as a writing tool to use as a guide to
rewrite early submissions without penalty until they are “clean”. This
means you may submit Submission 1 multiple times. In order to earn
the 50 points for Submission 1, the first submission must done by the
due date and at the beginning of class. Once you are satisfied and
ready for me to grade the assignment you MUST submit (by due date
and at the beginning of class) it to the final submission prompt (50
points) so I know for sure the paper is to your satisfaction. Plagiarism
in all final submissions will be reported (See student conduct). This
means that if there is evidence of plagiarism in Submission 2 the
plagiarism will be reported.