The document focuses on industrial safety engineering in the oil, gas, and refinery sectors, outlining objectives to identify hazards, establish safety systems, and develop a safety model to minimize risks associated with flammable liquids. Key components include analyzing accident history, employing statistical methods for reliability, and identifying safety factors. The conclusion emphasizes the need for a sustainable and systematic approach to enhance safety measures in these high-risk industries.

1. Industrial Safety Engineering : A Sustainable Solution For
Safety In Oil Gas and Refinery
Presented By ID
• SUDIPTO PAL 1*.0*.0*.00*
• MD. MAHFUJUL HAQ 1*.0*.0*.00*
• MD. IBRAHIM RAZA 1*.0*.0*.00*
Under the Supervision of
Dr. Mohammad Sarwar Morshed.
Professor
Dept. of MPE, AUST
Examiner
Dr. A.F.M Anwarul Haque
Professor
Dept. of MPE, AUST
1

2. Objective, Problem Statement, Background, Accident History,
and Literature Review
Presented By
MD. IBRAHIM RAZA
1*.0*.0*.00*
2

3. Objectives
 Identify and classify industrial hazards related to oil, gas and refinery
industry
 Identify crucial safety indicators for flammable liquid processing
industries by the instructions of NIOSH
 Establish a safe & improved safety system for the oil, gas & refinery
industries capable of detecting potential failures and protect the
environment, workforce and resource
 Develop a safety model that minimizes most common hazards related
to this field
 Implement the safe execution plan through the developed model
3

4. Problem Statement
Oil, gas and refinery industries are home for highly flammable fluid or crude oil
BP Texas Refinery explosion: 15 killed , 180 injured
Financial loss 1.5 Billion
AIM:
Construct a safe model for industries dealing with flammable liquid and gas
4

5. Accident History
BP Taxes Refinery:
 BP- Texas City Oil Refinery Explosion (2005)
 The most severe blast damage occurred within the ISOM unit
 Took away 15 lives, injured over 170 people
Mumbai Refinery :
 The MHN was completely destroyed in the 2005 fire
 11 people died and 11 others were reported missing
5

6. Literature Review
6

7. 7

8. Methodology, Model (theoretical Part)
Presented By
Md. Mahfujul Haq
1*.0*.0*.00*
8

9. Methodology
Planning Of the Assessment • Information
Collection
Hazard Identification • Severity
• MSDS
Risk
Assessment
• Probability
• Consequences
Determination Of
Risk Level
Decision on
action
Hazard Identification Process
9

10. Risk Assessment Matrix
Methodology
10
y

11. Accident Causation Analysis and Taxonomy
Way to trace industrial accidents causes & prevent the future formation of causes behind it.
Safety Perspective
Machine
Man
Management
Information
Resource
Environment
FRAM Approaches
• Identify and describe the necessary function
• Characterize the variability
 assess how the variability of each function affects
 Identify ways to manage the possible uncontrolled performance variability
Methodology
11

12. FLOW CHART
Methodology
12

13. Proposed Safety Model
1.Hazard
Mananagement
•Hazard Identification
•Source identify
•Classify the hazards according to their
characteristics
2.Hazard
Analysis
• Risk assesment
• MSDS
• Outcome analysis
3.Action Tobe
Taken
13

14. Proposed Safety Model
Target fire type (American Classification)
14

15. Type of Hazards:
 Confined Space
 Struck-By/Caught-In/Caught- Between
 Temperature extremes
 Falls
 Electrical and Other Hazardous Energy
 Noise
 Machine Related
Under every type there are several hazards. Almost 50 hazards are identified and listed
in the Repost.
Source of Hazards:
1.Physical Hazard
2.Chemical Hazard
3.Biological Hazard
4.Hazards Out of Human factors
5.Psychosocial Hazards
15

16. Risk Matrix
Severity Probability Catastrophic (1) Critical (2) Marginal (3) Negotiable (4)
Frequent High High Serious Medium
Probable High High Serious Medium
Occasional High Serious Medium Low
Remote Serious Medium Medium Low
Improbable Medium Medium Medium Low
Eliminated Eliminated Eliminated Eliminated Eliminated
16

17. Material Safety Data Sheet
 Properties
 Safe storage Uses
 Health Hazard information
 Precaution for Use
 Safe Handling Information
 Procedure for Emergency
 Disposal
17

18. Accident Happening Components
Terget
Hazard Situation
Accident
Happening
18

19. The Hierarchy of control
19

20. Safety Factors
20
y

21. Hazard Identification
Source Identification
Data Collection
Risk Level
Probability
Evolution
Treatment
Feasible ?
Elimination/ Substitution
Compatible
with safe
work?
EngineeringControl
Administrative Control
PPE
NOYES
YESYES
NO
Safety Control Model
21

22. Statistical Analysis, Results and Findings, Conclusion
Presented by
Sudipto Pal
1*.0*.0*.00*
22

23. Statistical Analysis
 Cronbach’s alpha
 Descriptive statistics
 Wilcoxon signed rank test
 Factor analysis.
23

24. Descriptive Statistics
Condition Cronbach’s Alpha Cronbach’s Alpha Based on
Standardized Items
N of Items
Importance .418 .401 14
Probability .483 .515 14
24
Safety Factors Importance Probability of Incident Occurrence
Mean Variance Standard
Deviation
Mean Variance Standard
Deviation
Valid permit to work 4.07 0.210 0.458 2.33 0.381 0.617
GasTest 4.13 0.267 0.516 2.53 0.410 0.640
Verify Isolation 3.73 0.352 0.594 2.40 0.257 0.507
Authorization before working 4.00 0.571 0.756 2.67 1.095 1.047
Fall Protection 4.07 0.495 0.704 2.53 0.410 0.640
Overriding 4.00 0.429 0.655 2.27 0.924 0.961
Safety Critical Equipment 4.13 0.1238 0.351 2.60 1.400 1.183
Work Surroundings 4.07 0.0667 0.248 2.40 0.257 0.507
UnauthorizedTools 3.80 0.314 0.561 2.60 0.971 0.986
Check List 4.20 0.457 0.676 2.80 1.400 1.183
Suspended Load 3.93 0.0667 0.258 2.60 0.886 0.941
Remove Smoking 4.07 0.352 0.594 2.40 0.257 0.507
Management of Change 3.93 0.210 0.458 2.53 0.410 0.640
Management Plan 4.27 0.352 0.594 2.53 0.410 0.640

25. 25

26. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Importance-Probability Pair Z P-value
Valid permit to work -3.345 0.001
GasTest -3.448 0.001
Verify Isolation -3.397 0.001
Authorization before working -2.673 0.006
Fall Protection -3.372 0.001
Overriding -3.225 0.001
Safety Critical Equipment -2.979 0.003
Work Surroundings -3.542 0.000
UnauthorizedTools -2.684 0.007
Check List -3.119 0.002
Suspended Load -3.002 0.003
Smoking -3.228 0.001
Management of Change -3.286 0.001
Management Plan -3.219 0.001
26
Z= Relation between two components
P= Significant Level

27. Factor Analysis
KMO and Bartlett'sTest
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling
Adequacy.
.502
Bartlett'sTest of
Sphericity
Approx.Chi-Square 162.664
df 91
Sig. .000
27
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Valid permit to test 1.000 .768
Gas test 1.000 .887
Verify isolation 1.000 .921
Authorization before
working
1.000 .922
Fall protection 1.000 .842
Overriding 1.000 .922
Safety critical
equipment
1.000 .854
Work surroundings 1.000 .878
Unauthorized tools 1.000 .848
Check list 1.000 .848
Suspended load 1.000 .788
Remove smoking 1.000 .900
Management of
change
1.000 .411
Management plan 1.000 .972
Extraction Method: PrincipalComponent
Analysis.
Table 7: Communalities

28. Rotated Component Matrix
RotatedComponent Matrix
Component
1 2 3 4 5 6
Valid permit to test .456
Gas test .840
Verify isolation .767
Authorization before working .919
Fall protection .813
Overriding .932
Safety critical equipment .894
Work surroundings .811
Unauthorized tools .783
Check list .811
Suspended load .822
Remove smoking .899
Management of change .551
Management plan .604 .594
Extraction Method: PrincipalComponent Analysis.
Rotation Method:Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
a. Rotation converged in 7 iterations.
28

29. Results and Findings
• 14 safety factors are identified to be taken care of to eliminate most common
accidents
• Analyzed in SPSS to find out the reliability
• 50 Hazards are identified and grouped into 7 categories
• New MSDS list for every raw materials & Products
• Constructed a sustainable safety model
• Inter relation between the 14 factors are determined
29

30. Future work
• Our research based on only Class-B fire. But Class-C and Class-D fire
can be cause of accidents in this industries sometimes. So this 2
classes can be topic of further work.( Chapter 5 section 1.1.1 )
• For further research and better management control this study need to
be implemented in psycho-social sector. (Reference : Source of
hazards Chapter 5 section 2 )
• Elimination and substitution can be decreased by avoiding external
parties (chapter 5 section 2)
30

31. Conclusion
• The model constructed is sustainable at the present situation because as the selected
industries are well stablished and the layout and other systems are not easily can be
changed.
• Studied on present safety condition offshore industries.( Chapter 1.3 and Chapter 2 )
• Identify crucial safety indicators for flammable liquid processing industries by the
instructions of NIOSH (refer to Chapter 2)
• Establish a safe & improved safety system for the oil, gas & refinery industries capable of
detecting potential failures and protect the environment, workforce and resource ( Refer to
Chapter 6 )
• We have Identified and classified industrial hazards related to oil, gas and refinery sector
(refer to Chapter 5)
• Construct a safety model that minimizes most common hazards related to this field. (Refer
to Chapter 5)
• The industry has effective arrangements for identifying, sharing and learning lessons for
controlling major hazard risks. (Refer to Chapter 5)
31

32. 32

33. 33
Though this file is uploaded by me, all the group members of
mine helped me to make the full slide. All information is not
shared here as the research work was conducted on major KPI
industries in Bangladesh. Here the overview of the research is
shared which does not harm any of the authorities' privacy.
Chapters included in the Future work & Conclusion part is the
references from our final report.