SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1
A Blueprint for Increasing the Success Rate of
Priority Learners in Primary Schools
Executive Summary
The Government is demanding accountablilty through the introduction of
National Standards. It funds various initiaves to increase the literacy levels of the
lowest performing students who are typically overly represented by Maori and
Pasifika children. Reading Recovery is one of these initiaves but after 30 years of
implementation, the students with the greatest need are still not achieving.
In 2012 The World Literacy Foundation reported the links between illiteracy and
criminal offending, poverty, welfare dependency and poor health. It reported that
illiteracy in New Zealand costs the country $3.166 billion a year.
Edmund Hillary Primary School is a Decile 1 school in South Auckland with a
predominantly Maori and Pasifika population. They have been involved in
government initiatives and found that for the most part they do not work
adequately for their students. For the past five years Edmund Hillary has been
running a programme called Quick60 for students from New Entrants to Year 6.
Before implementing the programme 2% of their students were reading at or above
National Standards. This year, no student will leave the school reading below a
10 -11 year old reading level. This means that even the lowest performers will be able
to function in, and contribute to, society.
Past and ongoing research initiaves show that Quick60 is a powerful, proven, cost
effective opportunity to solve the issue of literacy achievement for those with the
greatest need.
The premise of this proposal is that with adequate funding, schools could streamline
the Edmund Hillary model from five years to three years. By using Quick60 they
could replicate the incredible student success of Edmund Hillary and ensure literacy
achievement for all.
2 3
What Is Quick60?Introduction
The New Zealand Ministry of Education is demanding accountability through the
introduction of National Standards. The Ministry has funded many initiatves to assist schools
meet its goals. While these measures have worked for middle class students, minimal gains
have been made for the lowest achievers. Since the 1980’s the Government has funded
the Reading Recovery programme to catch those student who are failing after one year
at school and return them to average levels of performance within 20 weeks. Even with this
long-term, costly intervention, 25% of students, now called Priority Learners, continue to not
meet National Standards and fail within the system.
The opposition Labour Party has suggested that increasing the implementation of
Reading Recovery to all failing six year olds would provide a solution. While this is an
admirable suggestion, the cost would be prohibitive. In fact, Reading Recovery has not
been fully funded since its implementation in the early 1980’s. Reading Recovery funding
has traditionally been allocated to enable all schools to implement Reading Recovery
regardless of their decile ranking leaving many low decile schools with students needing,
but not receiving, sufficient funding. Historically these students are Maori and Pasifika
particularly those in Decile 1 schools. They have not achieved well academically and
therefore have no pathway to job security and future success in the wider community. The
World Literacy Foundation reported the links between illiteracy, criminal offending, poverty,
welfare dependency and poor health, and all political parties see these as issues that
urgently need addressing to benefit not only those in need but also society as a whole.
The Edmund Hillary Story
Edmund Hillary School is a Decile 1 full primary school in South Auckland. The roll is
predominantly Maori and Pasifika. In 2010 the new Principal reported – The number of
students identified with High Needs enrolling at EH School has reached critical levels.
(High needs classification means the students have either extreme learning needs and /
or extreme behavioural needs and/or there are family circumstances that demonstrate
a high level of need.) The current numbers of High Needs students already in the school,
combined with new High Needs students enrolling, is propelling the school towards
a precarious tipping point. Therefore it is no longer just or fair to expect teachers and
students to cope without a much greater level of planned support.
That year the school implemented a literacy intervention programme called Quick60. A
trained teacher worked with groups of older students reading well below their age level.
The results showed that with the correct instructional material, these students learned
to read and continued to read increasingly more difficult text in the classroom. This
intervention was expanded and continues alongside Quick60 Foundation which is a whole
class programme for Year 1 students designed to prevent failure before it can occur.
At the end of 2014, no child will leave Edmund Hillary reading below a
10 - 11 year reading level. This means that all these students will be able to use
speaking, reading and writing to succeed in the tasks that are necessary
to make informed choices and therefore participate fully in the
everyday life of our society.
Quick60 is a system of prevention and intervention designed so that schools, particularly those
with low decile rankings, can have all their students performing at or above National
Standards. The prevention, called Quick60 Foundation occurs as whole-class literacy
instruction for students entering school. The Quick60 Intervention is small-group literacy
instruction delivered by a teacher or teacher aide for students who are behind their age peers
in Years 2 - 6.
Quick60 was developed from two research projects that modified the Reading Recovery
programme.
Iversen and Tunmer, Phonological Processing Skills and the Reading Recovery Program, Journal
of Educational Psychology 1993, found that by systematically introducing phonological
recoding skills into the Reading Recovery lesson, students exited the programme more quickly
than those who had standard Reading Recovery.
Iversen, Tunmer and Chapman, The Effects of Varying Group Size of the Reading Recovery
Approach to Preventive Early Intervention, Journal of Learning Disabilities 2005, found that
by increasing the instructional time of the Reading Recovery lesson by 10 minutes, Reading
Recovery teachers could double the number of students served without making any sacrifices
in outcomes.
There were three other major findings from the 2005 research.
• Students responded very well to the small group instruction. Cooperation emerged
spontaneously in the group situation, with students helping each other on new tasks.
Where the tasks were familiar, a spirit of competition became apparent with students
trying to do better than their peers. The group dynamics worked especially well for Maori
and Pasifika.
• Paraprofessionals such as teacher aides could administer the programme if the
professional development was embedded in the programme.
• There were no suitable books that contained or reinforced the skills that the teachers
were endeavouring to teach.
Quick60 Intervention was developed to address all the findings of the research programmes.
• A gradient of books was written specifically to teach skills systematically. This ensures that
skills are taught and enables teachers to spend more time teaching and less time searching
for appropriate instructional materials.
• Lesson plans are scripted so that inexperienced teachers and teacher aides can administer
the programme. Expert teaching is paramount to student success. Embedding the
professional development in the programme, allows teachers of all levels of experience to
focus on quality instruction and management.
• Pre and post tests, check sheets and data point sheets were included to enable teachers to
monitor ongoing reading accuracy, literal and inferential comprehension and fluency.
Quick60 Foundation was developed because low decile schools using Quick60 Intervention
for older students had new entrants arriving at school on their fith birthday with limited
vocabularies and world knowledge whether English was their first language or not. The schools
needed something to prevent failure before it occurred. Resources, additional to the reading
resources, were added targetting pre-reading skills, vocabulary asquisiton and writing.
4 5
Quick60 provides students with the skills required for the acquisition and development of
literacy.
Quick60 Foundation
Quick60 Foundation provides a 90 minute block of literacy instruction.
Within this time students engage in oral language experiences, shared and guided
reading and writing activities.
They learn –
• basic science, social studies and maths concepts and vocabulary
• how to compare, contrast and categorise.
• seven phonological awareness skills
• concepts of print
• eight early comprehension strategies
• alphabet letter names and sounds
• letter formation
• high-frequency words
• phonic skills
• how to read and comprehend increasingly difficult text
• how to write simple sentences using the high-frequency words and phonic skills they
learned while reading
• how to write simple passages in a variety of fiction and non-fiction genre.
Quick60 Intervention
Quick60 Intervention provides a 45 minute block of literacy instruction for groups of up
to five students. Within this time, students engage in reading and writing activities.
They learn –
• to read and write high-frequency words fluently
• a new high-frequency word every day
• to read previously seen text fluently
• to monitor their ongoing reading comprehension
• the conventions of spelling including how to hear and record sounds in words and
how to make orthographic analogies - going from known spellings to write unknown
words.
• a new phonic skill daily
• new content vocabulary
• how to bring their world knowledge to a text to help them comprehend its content
• how to use what they already know to help them solve what they don’t know.
One of the most important outcomes of implementing Quick60 is the
increased self esteem of previously failing students and the change that this
brings about in their general behaviour.
What Students Learn With Quick60
What Is Involved in the Implementation of Quick60
Quick60 Foundation
Quick60 Foundation requires –
• A 90 minute daily block of literacy instruction.
• Agreement from the New Entrant/Year 1 teacher. The literacy instruction may differ
from what he/she already does.
• Pre and post testing and on-going monitoring.
• A commitment to follow the daily lesson plans.
• An interactive white board.
• At least one classroom computer.
• Purchasing the required products.
• Access to a photocopier or printer to copy blackline masters.
Quick60 Intervention
Quick60 Intervention requires –
• A 45 minute daily block of literacy instruction.
• The assignment of a teacher to work with groups of up to five students and/or the
assignment of a teacher aide to work with groups of up to three students.
• A designated work place.
• The selection of groups of priority students from Years 2 - 6.
• Pre and post testing and on-going monitoring.
• A commitment to follow the daily lesson plans.
• A white board and easel.
• Purchasing the required products.
• Access to a photocopier or printer to copy blackline masters.
How Quick60 Works
A teacher works with groups of up
to five priority students from Years
2 - 6 for 45 minutes a day
and/or
a teacher aide works with groups of
up to three priority students
The New Entrant/Year 1
teacher works with the
whole class for the 90
minute literacy block
Failure is prevented
Students are returned
to average levels of
performance
6 7
Quick60 improves literacy in many ways.
• It combines oral language, reading and writing.
• It teaches basic skills explicitly and sequentially.
• It uses books that are especially written to include the learning and reinforce skills in a
natural, rather than a contrived way.
• It includes daily writing aligned to reading that consolidates skills in both areas.
• It improves both fluency and comprehension so students are able to read and understand
increasingly difficult text within, and outside of, the prescribed Quick60 books.
• It has revision built in both within and across lessons, with many opportunities to consolidate
learning.
• It has weekly check points to assist teachers make more powerful instructional decisions.
• It includes colour-coded oral reading check sheets that provide teachers with ongoing
evidence to help them personalize instruction within the lesson format.
• It has booklets that connect the school and the home so parents become involved in their
children’s reading and writing activities.
Quick60 Training
Long, expensive training is largely unnecessary for Quick60 because the professional
development is embedded within the lesson plans. However it is recommended that schools
attend a two-day course to familiarise themselves with the Quick60 components and how
they are used.
New Zealand Research Based Evidence
A Quick60 Intervention pilot study was carried out in November 2010. The schools who
chose to take part were a mix of urban and rural, were based in diverse social and
economic areas from Whangarei to Dunedin, and included students from a variety of
ethnic backgrounds. The Quick60 Intervention pilot was delivered by a range of teaching
professionals including principals, associate principals, Reading Recovery teachers, reading/
behaviour specialists, classroom teachers and teacher aides.
The results showed that all students made progress. The average age of the students was 8.4
years, the average number of lessons was 20, and the average gains made were 6.3
instructional reading levels.
In 2011 different clusters of schools started implementing Quick60 Intervention.
Teacher aides implementing Quick60 have all reported that they now
feel empowered. They know what to do to ensure the success for their
students because the learning is in the books and the
professional development is embedded in the daily lesson plans.
How Quick60 Improves Literacy
Figure 1 shows the average and best-results data for three different ethnic groups.
Quick60 Intervention Results
Quick60 Intervention works. Our research involving 96 students aged between 6.5 and 13,
shows that in an average of 20 lessons the hardest to teach struggling readers increased
their reading ability by an average of 6.3 reading levels.
There was a noticeable improvement in behaviour and attendance once students started
the Quick60 Intervention programme, and this continued when they returned to their
classrooms.
Because Quick60 Intervention is a small group (3 - 5 students) programme, it is more cost
effective than a one-on-one intervention and produces similar results. It also means that
more students benefit from extra teaching.
Quick60 Intervention has the essential learning written into the students’ books and
professional development embedded in the lesson plans. If the teacher leaves the school,
all the knowledge remains within the Quick60 programme at the school.
ReadingLevel
Reading Level Entering Quick60
Reading Level Leaving Quick60
Average
Best Result
Average
Best Result
Average
Best Result
0
5
15
10
20
25
30
Average Reading Level Progression
Using Quick60
Average Age
Average Number of Lessons
using Quick60
6.3
8.4
20
Figure 1. Average and Best-Results Data
Students with
English As Their Second Language
Ethnic Minority Students with
English As Their First Language
European Students with English As
Their First Language
A
B
A B C
C
8 9
The value of literacy and the real consequences of not being literate in the wider context
of societal issues cannot be overstated. In 2012 The World Literacy Foundation reported
the link between illiteracy, juvenile offending, prison populations, welfare dependency
and poor health. The report found that 85% of both juvenile offenders and prison inmates
were functionally illiterate, meaning they were unable to perform tasks such as reading
a medicine bottle label or filling out a job application. The Foundation cites education
as the first key step to overcoming obstacles that lock people into the cycle of poverty
and disadvantage. The report put the cost of illiteracy in New Zealand at $3.166 billion.
They estimated that for every single year that the average level of education of the adult
population is raised, there is a corresponding increase of 3.7% in long-term economic
growth and a 6% increase in per capita income.
Quick60 has demonstrated that it works with the lowest performing students in our schools
and has them reading not only at or above National Standards but also at a level where
they are truly functionally literate.
How Implementation of Quick60 Benefits Society
Literate Adults
Ability to obtain
employment
Less dependence
on welfare
Reduction in
personal poverty
Less antisocial behaviour –
more positive self concept
Fewer prison inmates
Increase in
national productivity
Cycle of illiteracy broken
Lower rate of juvenile and
adult criminal offending
Reduction in
health related issues
There are obvious financial benefits to be gained from using Quick60 for the Ministry of
Education and for schools.
• The 2005 research which underpins the Quick60 Intervention shows that by doubling the
number of students, an adaptation of Reading Recovery is twice as cost efficient.
• Increasing group size from one on two to one on five for teachers makes the Q60
Intervention even more cost effective.
• Savings on teacher salaries can be made by using teacher aides working with groups of
three students.
• Because the professional development is built into the lesson plans, there is no need to
pay for further long-term expensive training.
• Implementing Quick60 Foundation leads to fewer students needing Quick60
Intervention, Reading Recovery and /or further long-term support from RTLBs and RTLits.
• Once the books are purchased, the programme stays with the school.
In order to significantly reduce the incidence of literacy failure in Priority Learners,
particularly Maori and Pasifika students, we are suggesting streamlining the Edmund Hillary
model from five years to three years.
Year 1 		 Implementation of Quick60 Foundation at NE/Year 1
		Implementation of Quick60 Intervention for Students in Years 5/6
Year 2 		 Implementation of Quick60 Foundation at NE/Year 1
		Implementation of Quick60 Intervention for Students in Year 4
		Implementation of Quick60 Intervention for Students in Year 2 who still require 	
		 support after Year 1
Year 3 		 Implementation of Quick60 Foundation at NE/Year 1
		Implementation of Quick60 Intervention for Students in Year 3			
		Implementation of Quick60 Intervention for Students in Year 2 who still require 	
		 support after Year 1
Edmund Hillary has already shared their results and provided demonstration lessons to
schools in the wider Auckland area. We suggest that this continue. We also propose
finding schools that could act as hubs for their areas. Koraunui School in Stokes Valley is
willing to provide that service in the Wellington area. A group of Northland schools working
with the Northland RTLB group who this year were part of a research project for Quick60
Foundation could provide another hub.
The Financial Benefits of Implementing Quick60
The Proposal

More Related Content

What's hot

Quality Primary Education: Issues, Options for Cost Effective Strategies and ...
Quality Primary Education: Issues, Options for Cost Effective Strategies and ...Quality Primary Education: Issues, Options for Cost Effective Strategies and ...
Quality Primary Education: Issues, Options for Cost Effective Strategies and ...Government of Ekiti State, Nigeria
 
Deconstructing SEN to Construct Inclusion - David Bartram
Deconstructing SEN to Construct Inclusion - David BartramDeconstructing SEN to Construct Inclusion - David Bartram
Deconstructing SEN to Construct Inclusion - David BartramChallenge Partners
 
ACA Executive Summary
ACA Executive SummaryACA Executive Summary
ACA Executive Summary
Kathy Hershelman
 
Current issues and challenges in education
Current issues and challenges in educationCurrent issues and challenges in education
Current issues and challenges in educationthenetworkcampus
 
Skills for Work.AHDS SLF Extra
Skills for Work.AHDS SLF ExtraSkills for Work.AHDS SLF Extra
Skills for Work.AHDS SLF Extra
AHDScotland
 
Coram Life Education
Coram Life EducationCoram Life Education
Coram Life Education
Public Health England
 
Current Issues in Education - Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century Today
Current Issues in Education - Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century TodayCurrent Issues in Education - Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century Today
Current Issues in Education - Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century Today
polchan
 
Changing teaching practices unesco
Changing teaching practices unescoChanging teaching practices unesco
Changing teaching practices unesco
marvox
 
Curriculum_Initiatives
Curriculum_InitiativesCurriculum_Initiatives
Curriculum_InitiativesSajid Butt
 
Teacher motivation & teachers’ working conditions: GLOBAL AND REGIONAL EVIDENCE
Teacher motivation & teachers’ working conditions: GLOBAL AND REGIONAL EVIDENCETeacher motivation & teachers’ working conditions: GLOBAL AND REGIONAL EVIDENCE
Teacher motivation & teachers’ working conditions: GLOBAL AND REGIONAL EVIDENCE
Teachers Task Force for Education 2030
 
Effective SEN intervention
Effective SEN interventionEffective SEN intervention
Effective SEN intervention
Miles50
 
Ch 3 inclusion_and_collaboration
Ch 3 inclusion_and_collaborationCh 3 inclusion_and_collaboration
Ch 3 inclusion_and_collaborationErin Waltman
 
AHDS 2015 Loretta Giorcelli
AHDS 2015 Loretta GiorcelliAHDS 2015 Loretta Giorcelli
AHDS 2015 Loretta Giorcelli
AHDScotland
 
LCAP and Common Core Standards: transforming counseling at the schools
LCAP and Common Core Standards: transforming counseling at the schoolsLCAP and Common Core Standards: transforming counseling at the schools
LCAP and Common Core Standards: transforming counseling at the schools
Harvey Hoyo
 
Report of the Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics - The National Academies
Report of the Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics - The National AcademiesReport of the Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics - The National Academies
Report of the Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics - The National AcademiesSTEM Summit
 
Best Practices in Diplahan National High School S.Y. 2016-2017
Best Practices in Diplahan National High School S.Y. 2016-2017Best Practices in Diplahan National High School S.Y. 2016-2017
Best Practices in Diplahan National High School S.Y. 2016-2017
Karlwinn Paitan
 
MA Assignment 1
MA Assignment 1MA Assignment 1
MA Assignment 1julier3846
 

What's hot (20)

Quality Primary Education: Issues, Options for Cost Effective Strategies and ...
Quality Primary Education: Issues, Options for Cost Effective Strategies and ...Quality Primary Education: Issues, Options for Cost Effective Strategies and ...
Quality Primary Education: Issues, Options for Cost Effective Strategies and ...
 
Deconstructing SEN to Construct Inclusion - David Bartram
Deconstructing SEN to Construct Inclusion - David BartramDeconstructing SEN to Construct Inclusion - David Bartram
Deconstructing SEN to Construct Inclusion - David Bartram
 
Trends and Issues in EFL
Trends and Issues in EFLTrends and Issues in EFL
Trends and Issues in EFL
 
ACA Executive Summary
ACA Executive SummaryACA Executive Summary
ACA Executive Summary
 
Current issues and challenges in education
Current issues and challenges in educationCurrent issues and challenges in education
Current issues and challenges in education
 
Skills for Work.AHDS SLF Extra
Skills for Work.AHDS SLF ExtraSkills for Work.AHDS SLF Extra
Skills for Work.AHDS SLF Extra
 
Coram Life Education
Coram Life EducationCoram Life Education
Coram Life Education
 
PunarNirmaan2020
PunarNirmaan2020PunarNirmaan2020
PunarNirmaan2020
 
Current Issues in Education - Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century Today
Current Issues in Education - Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century TodayCurrent Issues in Education - Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century Today
Current Issues in Education - Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century Today
 
Changing teaching practices unesco
Changing teaching practices unescoChanging teaching practices unesco
Changing teaching practices unesco
 
Curriculum_Initiatives
Curriculum_InitiativesCurriculum_Initiatives
Curriculum_Initiatives
 
Teacher motivation & teachers’ working conditions: GLOBAL AND REGIONAL EVIDENCE
Teacher motivation & teachers’ working conditions: GLOBAL AND REGIONAL EVIDENCETeacher motivation & teachers’ working conditions: GLOBAL AND REGIONAL EVIDENCE
Teacher motivation & teachers’ working conditions: GLOBAL AND REGIONAL EVIDENCE
 
Effective SEN intervention
Effective SEN interventionEffective SEN intervention
Effective SEN intervention
 
Ch 3 inclusion_and_collaboration
Ch 3 inclusion_and_collaborationCh 3 inclusion_and_collaboration
Ch 3 inclusion_and_collaboration
 
AHDS 2015 Loretta Giorcelli
AHDS 2015 Loretta GiorcelliAHDS 2015 Loretta Giorcelli
AHDS 2015 Loretta Giorcelli
 
LCAP and Common Core Standards: transforming counseling at the schools
LCAP and Common Core Standards: transforming counseling at the schoolsLCAP and Common Core Standards: transforming counseling at the schools
LCAP and Common Core Standards: transforming counseling at the schools
 
Report of the Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics - The National Academies
Report of the Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics - The National AcademiesReport of the Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics - The National Academies
Report of the Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics - The National Academies
 
Best Practices in Diplahan National High School S.Y. 2016-2017
Best Practices in Diplahan National High School S.Y. 2016-2017Best Practices in Diplahan National High School S.Y. 2016-2017
Best Practices in Diplahan National High School S.Y. 2016-2017
 
MA Assignment 1
MA Assignment 1MA Assignment 1
MA Assignment 1
 
Exuberance
ExuberanceExuberance
Exuberance
 

Similar to Increasing Sucess for Priority Learners

Standards & Quality Report 2018-19
Standards & Quality Report 2018-19Standards & Quality Report 2018-19
Standards & Quality Report 2018-19
AP Pietri
 
2. Learning And Teaching In Primary Schools
2. Learning And Teaching In Primary Schools2. Learning And Teaching In Primary Schools
2. Learning And Teaching In Primary Schools
Lisa Graves
 
effective_schools.pdf
effective_schools.pdfeffective_schools.pdf
effective_schools.pdf
JonelynCastor
 
Bright start investment presentation
Bright start investment presentationBright start investment presentation
Bright start investment presentationGary Surdam
 
Stanford SOCIAL INNOVATIONReviewRedefining Education i.docx
Stanford SOCIAL INNOVATIONReviewRedefining  Education  i.docxStanford SOCIAL INNOVATIONReviewRedefining  Education  i.docx
Stanford SOCIAL INNOVATIONReviewRedefining Education i.docx
whitneyleman54422
 
Education Please respond to the following· Based on the Webte.docx
Education Please respond to the following· Based on the Webte.docxEducation Please respond to the following· Based on the Webte.docx
Education Please respond to the following· Based on the Webte.docx
jack60216
 
Act 6 nelsy.buelvas-2
Act 6 nelsy.buelvas-2Act 6 nelsy.buelvas-2
Act 6 nelsy.buelvas-2nelsybuelvas
 
Ofsted Report 2015.PDF
Ofsted Report 2015.PDFOfsted Report 2015.PDF
Ofsted Report 2015.PDFDarran Girling
 
DUE 5-13-15 NO plagiarismEducation Please respond to the fo.docx
DUE 5-13-15    NO plagiarismEducation Please respond to the fo.docxDUE 5-13-15    NO plagiarismEducation Please respond to the fo.docx
DUE 5-13-15 NO plagiarismEducation Please respond to the fo.docx
jacksnathalie
 
Cultural studies
Cultural studiesCultural studies
Cultural studies
Pet Bunthorng
 
Ryedale Federation
Ryedale FederationRyedale Federation
Ryedale Federation
Gareth Jenkins
 
3 Domains of Work for Schools with Students who are Homeless
3 Domains of Work for Schools with Students who are Homeless3 Domains of Work for Schools with Students who are Homeless
3 Domains of Work for Schools with Students who are Homeless
DoctoralNet Limited
 
The Power of the School – Community – University Partnership
The Power of the School – Community – University PartnershipThe Power of the School – Community – University Partnership
The Power of the School – Community – University Partnership
Marion H. Martinez
 
Curriculum innovations
Curriculum innovationsCurriculum innovations
Curriculum innovationsRandy Epon
 
Center Colorado Results.doc
Center Colorado Results.docCenter Colorado Results.doc
Center Colorado Results.doc
Lindamood-Bell Learning Processes
 
Inclusive education ppt
Inclusive education pptInclusive education ppt
Inclusive education ppt
Mousumi Biswas
 
Parent.pptxutduyiufiluf;uf;iufiufliufiuf
Parent.pptxutduyiufiluf;uf;iufiufliufiufParent.pptxutduyiufiluf;uf;iufiufliufiuf
Parent.pptxutduyiufiluf;uf;iufiufliufiuf
SirajudinAkmel1
 
Standards and quality report201314draft1
Standards and quality report201314draft1Standards and quality report201314draft1
Standards and quality report201314draft1
AP Pietri
 
Kusuma Trust UK Annual Review 2014 2015-web
Kusuma Trust UK Annual Review 2014 2015-webKusuma Trust UK Annual Review 2014 2015-web
Kusuma Trust UK Annual Review 2014 2015-web
taniakarunaratne
 

Similar to Increasing Sucess for Priority Learners (20)

Standards & Quality Report 2018-19
Standards & Quality Report 2018-19Standards & Quality Report 2018-19
Standards & Quality Report 2018-19
 
2. Learning And Teaching In Primary Schools
2. Learning And Teaching In Primary Schools2. Learning And Teaching In Primary Schools
2. Learning And Teaching In Primary Schools
 
effective_schools.pdf
effective_schools.pdfeffective_schools.pdf
effective_schools.pdf
 
Bright start investment presentation
Bright start investment presentationBright start investment presentation
Bright start investment presentation
 
Stanford SOCIAL INNOVATIONReviewRedefining Education i.docx
Stanford SOCIAL INNOVATIONReviewRedefining  Education  i.docxStanford SOCIAL INNOVATIONReviewRedefining  Education  i.docx
Stanford SOCIAL INNOVATIONReviewRedefining Education i.docx
 
Education Please respond to the following· Based on the Webte.docx
Education Please respond to the following· Based on the Webte.docxEducation Please respond to the following· Based on the Webte.docx
Education Please respond to the following· Based on the Webte.docx
 
Act 6 nelsy.buelvas-2
Act 6 nelsy.buelvas-2Act 6 nelsy.buelvas-2
Act 6 nelsy.buelvas-2
 
Ofsted Report 2015.PDF
Ofsted Report 2015.PDFOfsted Report 2015.PDF
Ofsted Report 2015.PDF
 
DUE 5-13-15 NO plagiarismEducation Please respond to the fo.docx
DUE 5-13-15    NO plagiarismEducation Please respond to the fo.docxDUE 5-13-15    NO plagiarismEducation Please respond to the fo.docx
DUE 5-13-15 NO plagiarismEducation Please respond to the fo.docx
 
Cultural studies
Cultural studiesCultural studies
Cultural studies
 
Ryedale Federation
Ryedale FederationRyedale Federation
Ryedale Federation
 
3 Domains of Work for Schools with Students who are Homeless
3 Domains of Work for Schools with Students who are Homeless3 Domains of Work for Schools with Students who are Homeless
3 Domains of Work for Schools with Students who are Homeless
 
The Power of the School – Community – University Partnership
The Power of the School – Community – University PartnershipThe Power of the School – Community – University Partnership
The Power of the School – Community – University Partnership
 
Curriculum innovations
Curriculum innovationsCurriculum innovations
Curriculum innovations
 
CYBORG
CYBORGCYBORG
CYBORG
 
Center Colorado Results.doc
Center Colorado Results.docCenter Colorado Results.doc
Center Colorado Results.doc
 
Inclusive education ppt
Inclusive education pptInclusive education ppt
Inclusive education ppt
 
Parent.pptxutduyiufiluf;uf;iufiufliufiuf
Parent.pptxutduyiufiluf;uf;iufiufliufiufParent.pptxutduyiufiluf;uf;iufiufliufiuf
Parent.pptxutduyiufiluf;uf;iufiufliufiuf
 
Standards and quality report201314draft1
Standards and quality report201314draft1Standards and quality report201314draft1
Standards and quality report201314draft1
 
Kusuma Trust UK Annual Review 2014 2015-web
Kusuma Trust UK Annual Review 2014 2015-webKusuma Trust UK Annual Review 2014 2015-web
Kusuma Trust UK Annual Review 2014 2015-web
 

Increasing Sucess for Priority Learners

  • 1. 1 A Blueprint for Increasing the Success Rate of Priority Learners in Primary Schools Executive Summary The Government is demanding accountablilty through the introduction of National Standards. It funds various initiaves to increase the literacy levels of the lowest performing students who are typically overly represented by Maori and Pasifika children. Reading Recovery is one of these initiaves but after 30 years of implementation, the students with the greatest need are still not achieving. In 2012 The World Literacy Foundation reported the links between illiteracy and criminal offending, poverty, welfare dependency and poor health. It reported that illiteracy in New Zealand costs the country $3.166 billion a year. Edmund Hillary Primary School is a Decile 1 school in South Auckland with a predominantly Maori and Pasifika population. They have been involved in government initiatives and found that for the most part they do not work adequately for their students. For the past five years Edmund Hillary has been running a programme called Quick60 for students from New Entrants to Year 6. Before implementing the programme 2% of their students were reading at or above National Standards. This year, no student will leave the school reading below a 10 -11 year old reading level. This means that even the lowest performers will be able to function in, and contribute to, society. Past and ongoing research initiaves show that Quick60 is a powerful, proven, cost effective opportunity to solve the issue of literacy achievement for those with the greatest need. The premise of this proposal is that with adequate funding, schools could streamline the Edmund Hillary model from five years to three years. By using Quick60 they could replicate the incredible student success of Edmund Hillary and ensure literacy achievement for all.
  • 2. 2 3 What Is Quick60?Introduction The New Zealand Ministry of Education is demanding accountability through the introduction of National Standards. The Ministry has funded many initiatves to assist schools meet its goals. While these measures have worked for middle class students, minimal gains have been made for the lowest achievers. Since the 1980’s the Government has funded the Reading Recovery programme to catch those student who are failing after one year at school and return them to average levels of performance within 20 weeks. Even with this long-term, costly intervention, 25% of students, now called Priority Learners, continue to not meet National Standards and fail within the system. The opposition Labour Party has suggested that increasing the implementation of Reading Recovery to all failing six year olds would provide a solution. While this is an admirable suggestion, the cost would be prohibitive. In fact, Reading Recovery has not been fully funded since its implementation in the early 1980’s. Reading Recovery funding has traditionally been allocated to enable all schools to implement Reading Recovery regardless of their decile ranking leaving many low decile schools with students needing, but not receiving, sufficient funding. Historically these students are Maori and Pasifika particularly those in Decile 1 schools. They have not achieved well academically and therefore have no pathway to job security and future success in the wider community. The World Literacy Foundation reported the links between illiteracy, criminal offending, poverty, welfare dependency and poor health, and all political parties see these as issues that urgently need addressing to benefit not only those in need but also society as a whole. The Edmund Hillary Story Edmund Hillary School is a Decile 1 full primary school in South Auckland. The roll is predominantly Maori and Pasifika. In 2010 the new Principal reported – The number of students identified with High Needs enrolling at EH School has reached critical levels. (High needs classification means the students have either extreme learning needs and / or extreme behavioural needs and/or there are family circumstances that demonstrate a high level of need.) The current numbers of High Needs students already in the school, combined with new High Needs students enrolling, is propelling the school towards a precarious tipping point. Therefore it is no longer just or fair to expect teachers and students to cope without a much greater level of planned support. That year the school implemented a literacy intervention programme called Quick60. A trained teacher worked with groups of older students reading well below their age level. The results showed that with the correct instructional material, these students learned to read and continued to read increasingly more difficult text in the classroom. This intervention was expanded and continues alongside Quick60 Foundation which is a whole class programme for Year 1 students designed to prevent failure before it can occur. At the end of 2014, no child will leave Edmund Hillary reading below a 10 - 11 year reading level. This means that all these students will be able to use speaking, reading and writing to succeed in the tasks that are necessary to make informed choices and therefore participate fully in the everyday life of our society. Quick60 is a system of prevention and intervention designed so that schools, particularly those with low decile rankings, can have all their students performing at or above National Standards. The prevention, called Quick60 Foundation occurs as whole-class literacy instruction for students entering school. The Quick60 Intervention is small-group literacy instruction delivered by a teacher or teacher aide for students who are behind their age peers in Years 2 - 6. Quick60 was developed from two research projects that modified the Reading Recovery programme. Iversen and Tunmer, Phonological Processing Skills and the Reading Recovery Program, Journal of Educational Psychology 1993, found that by systematically introducing phonological recoding skills into the Reading Recovery lesson, students exited the programme more quickly than those who had standard Reading Recovery. Iversen, Tunmer and Chapman, The Effects of Varying Group Size of the Reading Recovery Approach to Preventive Early Intervention, Journal of Learning Disabilities 2005, found that by increasing the instructional time of the Reading Recovery lesson by 10 minutes, Reading Recovery teachers could double the number of students served without making any sacrifices in outcomes. There were three other major findings from the 2005 research. • Students responded very well to the small group instruction. Cooperation emerged spontaneously in the group situation, with students helping each other on new tasks. Where the tasks were familiar, a spirit of competition became apparent with students trying to do better than their peers. The group dynamics worked especially well for Maori and Pasifika. • Paraprofessionals such as teacher aides could administer the programme if the professional development was embedded in the programme. • There were no suitable books that contained or reinforced the skills that the teachers were endeavouring to teach. Quick60 Intervention was developed to address all the findings of the research programmes. • A gradient of books was written specifically to teach skills systematically. This ensures that skills are taught and enables teachers to spend more time teaching and less time searching for appropriate instructional materials. • Lesson plans are scripted so that inexperienced teachers and teacher aides can administer the programme. Expert teaching is paramount to student success. Embedding the professional development in the programme, allows teachers of all levels of experience to focus on quality instruction and management. • Pre and post tests, check sheets and data point sheets were included to enable teachers to monitor ongoing reading accuracy, literal and inferential comprehension and fluency. Quick60 Foundation was developed because low decile schools using Quick60 Intervention for older students had new entrants arriving at school on their fith birthday with limited vocabularies and world knowledge whether English was their first language or not. The schools needed something to prevent failure before it occurred. Resources, additional to the reading resources, were added targetting pre-reading skills, vocabulary asquisiton and writing.
  • 3. 4 5 Quick60 provides students with the skills required for the acquisition and development of literacy. Quick60 Foundation Quick60 Foundation provides a 90 minute block of literacy instruction. Within this time students engage in oral language experiences, shared and guided reading and writing activities. They learn – • basic science, social studies and maths concepts and vocabulary • how to compare, contrast and categorise. • seven phonological awareness skills • concepts of print • eight early comprehension strategies • alphabet letter names and sounds • letter formation • high-frequency words • phonic skills • how to read and comprehend increasingly difficult text • how to write simple sentences using the high-frequency words and phonic skills they learned while reading • how to write simple passages in a variety of fiction and non-fiction genre. Quick60 Intervention Quick60 Intervention provides a 45 minute block of literacy instruction for groups of up to five students. Within this time, students engage in reading and writing activities. They learn – • to read and write high-frequency words fluently • a new high-frequency word every day • to read previously seen text fluently • to monitor their ongoing reading comprehension • the conventions of spelling including how to hear and record sounds in words and how to make orthographic analogies - going from known spellings to write unknown words. • a new phonic skill daily • new content vocabulary • how to bring their world knowledge to a text to help them comprehend its content • how to use what they already know to help them solve what they don’t know. One of the most important outcomes of implementing Quick60 is the increased self esteem of previously failing students and the change that this brings about in their general behaviour. What Students Learn With Quick60 What Is Involved in the Implementation of Quick60 Quick60 Foundation Quick60 Foundation requires – • A 90 minute daily block of literacy instruction. • Agreement from the New Entrant/Year 1 teacher. The literacy instruction may differ from what he/she already does. • Pre and post testing and on-going monitoring. • A commitment to follow the daily lesson plans. • An interactive white board. • At least one classroom computer. • Purchasing the required products. • Access to a photocopier or printer to copy blackline masters. Quick60 Intervention Quick60 Intervention requires – • A 45 minute daily block of literacy instruction. • The assignment of a teacher to work with groups of up to five students and/or the assignment of a teacher aide to work with groups of up to three students. • A designated work place. • The selection of groups of priority students from Years 2 - 6. • Pre and post testing and on-going monitoring. • A commitment to follow the daily lesson plans. • A white board and easel. • Purchasing the required products. • Access to a photocopier or printer to copy blackline masters. How Quick60 Works A teacher works with groups of up to five priority students from Years 2 - 6 for 45 minutes a day and/or a teacher aide works with groups of up to three priority students The New Entrant/Year 1 teacher works with the whole class for the 90 minute literacy block Failure is prevented Students are returned to average levels of performance
  • 4. 6 7 Quick60 improves literacy in many ways. • It combines oral language, reading and writing. • It teaches basic skills explicitly and sequentially. • It uses books that are especially written to include the learning and reinforce skills in a natural, rather than a contrived way. • It includes daily writing aligned to reading that consolidates skills in both areas. • It improves both fluency and comprehension so students are able to read and understand increasingly difficult text within, and outside of, the prescribed Quick60 books. • It has revision built in both within and across lessons, with many opportunities to consolidate learning. • It has weekly check points to assist teachers make more powerful instructional decisions. • It includes colour-coded oral reading check sheets that provide teachers with ongoing evidence to help them personalize instruction within the lesson format. • It has booklets that connect the school and the home so parents become involved in their children’s reading and writing activities. Quick60 Training Long, expensive training is largely unnecessary for Quick60 because the professional development is embedded within the lesson plans. However it is recommended that schools attend a two-day course to familiarise themselves with the Quick60 components and how they are used. New Zealand Research Based Evidence A Quick60 Intervention pilot study was carried out in November 2010. The schools who chose to take part were a mix of urban and rural, were based in diverse social and economic areas from Whangarei to Dunedin, and included students from a variety of ethnic backgrounds. The Quick60 Intervention pilot was delivered by a range of teaching professionals including principals, associate principals, Reading Recovery teachers, reading/ behaviour specialists, classroom teachers and teacher aides. The results showed that all students made progress. The average age of the students was 8.4 years, the average number of lessons was 20, and the average gains made were 6.3 instructional reading levels. In 2011 different clusters of schools started implementing Quick60 Intervention. Teacher aides implementing Quick60 have all reported that they now feel empowered. They know what to do to ensure the success for their students because the learning is in the books and the professional development is embedded in the daily lesson plans. How Quick60 Improves Literacy Figure 1 shows the average and best-results data for three different ethnic groups. Quick60 Intervention Results Quick60 Intervention works. Our research involving 96 students aged between 6.5 and 13, shows that in an average of 20 lessons the hardest to teach struggling readers increased their reading ability by an average of 6.3 reading levels. There was a noticeable improvement in behaviour and attendance once students started the Quick60 Intervention programme, and this continued when they returned to their classrooms. Because Quick60 Intervention is a small group (3 - 5 students) programme, it is more cost effective than a one-on-one intervention and produces similar results. It also means that more students benefit from extra teaching. Quick60 Intervention has the essential learning written into the students’ books and professional development embedded in the lesson plans. If the teacher leaves the school, all the knowledge remains within the Quick60 programme at the school. ReadingLevel Reading Level Entering Quick60 Reading Level Leaving Quick60 Average Best Result Average Best Result Average Best Result 0 5 15 10 20 25 30 Average Reading Level Progression Using Quick60 Average Age Average Number of Lessons using Quick60 6.3 8.4 20 Figure 1. Average and Best-Results Data Students with English As Their Second Language Ethnic Minority Students with English As Their First Language European Students with English As Their First Language A B A B C C
  • 5. 8 9 The value of literacy and the real consequences of not being literate in the wider context of societal issues cannot be overstated. In 2012 The World Literacy Foundation reported the link between illiteracy, juvenile offending, prison populations, welfare dependency and poor health. The report found that 85% of both juvenile offenders and prison inmates were functionally illiterate, meaning they were unable to perform tasks such as reading a medicine bottle label or filling out a job application. The Foundation cites education as the first key step to overcoming obstacles that lock people into the cycle of poverty and disadvantage. The report put the cost of illiteracy in New Zealand at $3.166 billion. They estimated that for every single year that the average level of education of the adult population is raised, there is a corresponding increase of 3.7% in long-term economic growth and a 6% increase in per capita income. Quick60 has demonstrated that it works with the lowest performing students in our schools and has them reading not only at or above National Standards but also at a level where they are truly functionally literate. How Implementation of Quick60 Benefits Society Literate Adults Ability to obtain employment Less dependence on welfare Reduction in personal poverty Less antisocial behaviour – more positive self concept Fewer prison inmates Increase in national productivity Cycle of illiteracy broken Lower rate of juvenile and adult criminal offending Reduction in health related issues There are obvious financial benefits to be gained from using Quick60 for the Ministry of Education and for schools. • The 2005 research which underpins the Quick60 Intervention shows that by doubling the number of students, an adaptation of Reading Recovery is twice as cost efficient. • Increasing group size from one on two to one on five for teachers makes the Q60 Intervention even more cost effective. • Savings on teacher salaries can be made by using teacher aides working with groups of three students. • Because the professional development is built into the lesson plans, there is no need to pay for further long-term expensive training. • Implementing Quick60 Foundation leads to fewer students needing Quick60 Intervention, Reading Recovery and /or further long-term support from RTLBs and RTLits. • Once the books are purchased, the programme stays with the school. In order to significantly reduce the incidence of literacy failure in Priority Learners, particularly Maori and Pasifika students, we are suggesting streamlining the Edmund Hillary model from five years to three years. Year 1 Implementation of Quick60 Foundation at NE/Year 1 Implementation of Quick60 Intervention for Students in Years 5/6 Year 2 Implementation of Quick60 Foundation at NE/Year 1 Implementation of Quick60 Intervention for Students in Year 4 Implementation of Quick60 Intervention for Students in Year 2 who still require support after Year 1 Year 3 Implementation of Quick60 Foundation at NE/Year 1 Implementation of Quick60 Intervention for Students in Year 3 Implementation of Quick60 Intervention for Students in Year 2 who still require support after Year 1 Edmund Hillary has already shared their results and provided demonstration lessons to schools in the wider Auckland area. We suggest that this continue. We also propose finding schools that could act as hubs for their areas. Koraunui School in Stokes Valley is willing to provide that service in the Wellington area. A group of Northland schools working with the Northland RTLB group who this year were part of a research project for Quick60 Foundation could provide another hub. The Financial Benefits of Implementing Quick60 The Proposal