The document analyzes how two characters from a student's thriller opening represent particular social groups.
The main character, a schoolgirl victim, and the serial killer character are both compared to characters from the films It Follows and Orphan. Both the student's characters and the film characters could be placed in the social groups of young teenagers/girls based on their innocent appearances. However, the serial killer character subverts expectations by taking on the unexpected role of the predator/killer rather than the victim. Meanwhile, the Orphan character is even more surprising given her portrayal as an innocent young child before being revealed as the killer.
Shown within this powerpoint is how my media product represents particular social groups. I have discussed and evaluated my film opening to be able to consider the issues involved.
Shown within this powerpoint is how my media product represents particular social groups. I have discussed and evaluated my film opening to be able to consider the issues involved.
Characterization and the Kinetics of drying at the drying oven and with micro...Open Access Research Paper
The objective of this work is to contribute to valorization de Nephelium lappaceum by the characterization of kinetics of drying of seeds of Nephelium lappaceum. The seeds were dehydrated until a constant mass respectively in a drying oven and a microwawe oven. The temperatures and the powers of drying are respectively: 50, 60 and 70°C and 140, 280 and 420 W. The results show that the curves of drying of seeds of Nephelium lappaceum do not present a phase of constant kinetics. The coefficients of diffusion vary between 2.09.10-8 to 2.98. 10-8m-2/s in the interval of 50°C at 70°C and between 4.83×10-07 at 9.04×10-07 m-8/s for the powers going of 140 W with 420 W the relation between Arrhenius and a value of energy of activation of 16.49 kJ. mol-1 expressed the effect of the temperature on effective diffusivity.
WRI’s brand new “Food Service Playbook for Promoting Sustainable Food Choices” gives food service operators the very latest strategies for creating dining environments that empower consumers to choose sustainable, plant-rich dishes. This research builds off our first guide for food service, now with industry experience and insights from nearly 350 academic trials.
UNDERSTANDING WHAT GREEN WASHING IS!.pdfJulietMogola
Many companies today use green washing to lure the public into thinking they are conserving the environment but in real sense they are doing more harm. There have been such several cases from very big companies here in Kenya and also globally. This ranges from various sectors from manufacturing and goes to consumer products. Educating people on greenwashing will enable people to make better choices based on their analysis and not on what they see on marketing sites.
Natural farming @ Dr. Siddhartha S. Jena.pptxsidjena70
A brief about organic farming/ Natural farming/ Zero budget natural farming/ Subash Palekar Natural farming which keeps us and environment safe and healthy. Next gen Agricultural practices of chemical free farming.
Artificial Reefs by Kuddle Life Foundation - May 2024punit537210
Situated in Pondicherry, India, Kuddle Life Foundation is a charitable, non-profit and non-governmental organization (NGO) dedicated to improving the living standards of coastal communities and simultaneously placing a strong emphasis on the protection of marine ecosystems.
One of the key areas we work in is Artificial Reefs. This presentation captures our journey so far and our learnings. We hope you get as excited about marine conservation and artificial reefs as we are.
Please visit our website: https://kuddlelife.org
Our Instagram channel:
@kuddlelifefoundation
Our Linkedin Page:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/kuddlelifefoundation/
and write to us if you have any questions:
info@kuddlelife.org
Willie Nelson Net Worth: A Journey Through Music, Movies, and Business Venturesgreendigital
Willie Nelson is a name that resonates within the world of music and entertainment. Known for his unique voice, and masterful guitar skills. and an extraordinary career spanning several decades. Nelson has become a legend in the country music scene. But, his influence extends far beyond the realm of music. with ventures in acting, writing, activism, and business. This comprehensive article delves into Willie Nelson net worth. exploring the various facets of his career that have contributed to his large fortune.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Willie Nelson net worth is a testament to his enduring influence and success in many fields. Born on April 29, 1933, in Abbott, Texas. Nelson's journey from a humble beginning to becoming one of the most iconic figures in American music is nothing short of inspirational. His net worth, which estimated to be around $25 million as of 2024. reflects a career that is as diverse as it is prolific.
Early Life and Musical Beginnings
Humble Origins
Willie Hugh Nelson was born during the Great Depression. a time of significant economic hardship in the United States. Raised by his grandparents. Nelson found solace and inspiration in music from an early age. His grandmother taught him to play the guitar. setting the stage for what would become an illustrious career.
First Steps in Music
Nelson's initial foray into the music industry was fraught with challenges. He moved to Nashville, Tennessee, to pursue his dreams, but success did not come . Working as a songwriter, Nelson penned hits for other artists. which helped him gain a foothold in the competitive music scene. His songwriting skills contributed to his early earnings. laying the foundation for his net worth.
Rise to Stardom
Breakthrough Albums
The 1970s marked a turning point in Willie Nelson's career. His albums "Shotgun Willie" (1973), "Red Headed Stranger" (1975). and "Stardust" (1978) received critical acclaim and commercial success. These albums not only solidified his position in the country music genre. but also introduced his music to a broader audience. The success of these albums played a crucial role in boosting Willie Nelson net worth.
Iconic Songs
Willie Nelson net worth is also attributed to his extensive catalog of hit songs. Tracks like "Blue Eyes Crying in the Rain," "On the Road Again," and "Always on My Mind" have become timeless classics. These songs have not only earned Nelson large royalties but have also ensured his continued relevance in the music industry.
Acting and Film Career
Hollywood Ventures
In addition to his music career, Willie Nelson has also made a mark in Hollywood. His distinctive personality and on-screen presence have landed him roles in several films and television shows. Notable appearances include roles in "The Electric Horseman" (1979), "Honeysuckle Rose" (1980), and "Barbarosa" (1982). These acting gigs have added a significant amount to Willie Nelson net worth.
Television Appearances
Nelson's char
3. The main character in our thriller opening is a schoolgirl (played by Stephanie Taylor)
who gets kill by the other character in our thriller. This character is our main character
as she has the prevalence throughout the clip and she plays a bit part in the storyline.
A film character that is very similar to our main character is Jay, the main female
character in the film it follows.
Both characters are similar when it comes to appearance, as both of them look quite
young, so they could easily be placed in the social group young teenagers/adults. As
they look youthful and are female they would be seen as innocent by other people as
the stereotypical representation of a young female is that they would be innocent and
vulnerable, therefore seen as a victim. However the main character from it follows
may be seen as more vulnerable and more prone to being a victim than the other
character. This is because her hair colour is blonde and a stereotypical representation
of a blonde girl is that they are a bit stupid, so they may be easily fooled into to being
a victim.
Both main characters are also similar because of the costumes they wear in the films.
Both character are wearing quite normal clothing you would imagine a young adult or
teenage girl to where. This adds to the idea that their characters are vulnerable and in
danger as they could both be placed in a social group of young girl based on the
clothes that they are wearing.
4. In terms of the roles each of the characters play in their films both characters are very
similar as they both get followed. In both films we see the characters getting
stalked/followed by someone who will bring them danger, like a predator seeking out
its prey. So the fact that both the main characters are in the place of the victim and
are female links back to the stereotypical representation of girls, that they are
vulnerable, weak and more exposed to being harmed or put in danger.
One difference between our character and the main character from it follows is that
the character from it follows is seen fighting her attacker back whereas in our thriller
she is killed and that’s it. The fact that the main character from it follows fights back is
unexpected as one of the representations of females its that they are weak and
harmless, so the fact that she does fight back places her in the social group of a female
hero.
6. Another character from our thriller opening is a schoolgirl serial killer (played by
Louise Richardson) who kills the main character in our thriller, the victim (played by
Stephanie Taylor).
One film character that has very close similarities to our character is Esther, the main
character from the film Orphan who poses as an innocent orphan but actually goes
around killing people who she is very familiar with.
In terms of appearance both our character and the main character from the film
Orphan are very similar as both would be placed in the social groups of young children
and innocent girls based on what they look like. They both are young looking and are
wearing some form of clothing which looks like a uniform, this makes them look like
schoolgirls, which makes them look innocent to someone watching as one of the
typical representations of a schoolgirl is that their a victim and seen as vulnerable.
One difference between these character is terms of appearance is that our characters
looks older than the other character as she is wearing clothes that you would expect
an older child to wear rather than a very young child, also she is wearing make up
which you would associate with the teenagers age range. As well as this, the girl from
the film Orphan is seen wearing ribbons in her hair and light colours, which are some
features you could use to describe the image of a little girl.
7. Also both characters can easily be portrayed as a part of the social group young girls as they
both appear to look harmless and innocent from what they look like in their picture.
However the girl from the film Orphan could fit in with the social group more as in the film
she is very quiet and comes off as shy, these are normal connotations used to describe the
character of a little girl. Also she is seen playing with toys with other girls her age, this links
back to the social group of young girls as playing with toys and dolls is something they you
would expect them to do.
In terms of the parts that they plays in each film, both characters are similar as both roles
that they plays fit in well with the social group of a killer or as they are both seen with
blood on their hands and are seen following someone who plays the victim, that they seem
murdering. One of the differences between the characters roles in the films is that the
character from our thriller would likely been seen as a killer as in the opening she is seen
doing things that would make her look like a predator for example watching and following
the person she is planning to kill. As well as this she is up close in the thriller and when she
is she is seen with her hair covering her face. This implies that she is a killer as her actions
are not normal and would be seen as scary or freaky from a viewer’s point of view.
The main character from the film orphan would be harder to perceive as a killer or a
dangerous person as in the beginning of the film she is seen playing an innocent little girl
who you would expect to play the role of a victim. So generally you wouldn’t imagine she is
capable of killing someone as her role of an innocent girl is so convincing. So the fact that
we see her in the role of a killer/murder is unexpected and shocking as one of the
representations of a little girl is that she is harmless and not capable of doing anything evil
as they are seen a innocent and pure.