Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
How Distance Learners Will Shape Student Affairs Practice on Tomorrow’s Campus
1. Leslie Dare, Ed.D.
Amanda G. Thomas
Student Affairs
Division of
How Distance Learners will Shape
Student Affairs Practice on
Tomorrow’s Campus
NASPA Annual Conference
Tampa, Florida
March 22, 2005
2. Presentation Agenda
1. Overview of “DE & Student Affairs Survey”
• Overview of NC State & Division of Student Affairs
• Overview of Distance Education at NC State
• Survey Goals, Process & Methodology
• Respondent Demographics
• Survey Results
2. Distance Education Planning: Campus Considerations
3. Distance Education Planning: Student Affairs Considerations
4. Integrating the Distance Learning Population
5. Recommendations for Serving Distance Learners
6. Questions & Answers
4. NC State University
•Established 1887: Land-Grant Institution
•29,000+ students
–50 States
–90 Countries
•6,000+ employees
•11 Colleges
5. Division of Student Affairs
•Mission: The Division of Student Affairs facilitates the total
educational growth and development of NC State students to
include personal, social, physical, cultural, leadership, and
intellectual development.
•35 Units
•600 Employees
•Motto: STUDENTS FIRST
6. Division Units & Programs
Women’s Center
University Career Center
ROTC
Upward Bound/Talent Search
University Scholars
Campus Activities
Student Health Services
University Housing
Carmichael Complex
Facilities & Operations
Music
Multicultural Student Affairs
Center State/Arts Outreach
Physical Education
Greek Life
Crafts Center
Caldwell Fellows
Student Conduct
Distance Education
& Technology Services
Gallery of Art & Design
Counseling Center
University Dining
Dance Program
University Theatre
Health Promotions
Campus Recreation
Research & Assessment
Student Leadership, Ethics
& Public Service
8. Projected Enrollment Increase:
University Total = 22%
Distance Education = 302%
Distance Education Enrollment
29,854
2,215
36,500
8,908
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Fall 2003 2012
Total
DE
9. Why Distance Education and Student Affairs?
•Increasing numbers of distance learners
•“Students First”
•Accreditation: “Appropriate student development services
must be provided for distance learning programs as well as
on-campus programs.”
•Created leadership position
12. •“Pure” DE population
-Those students taking only DE courses
•“Hybrid” DE population
-Those students taking both DE and On Campus courses
Distance Education Enrollment
13. Primary
1. Create a baseline understanding of distance learners.
2. Gauge their use, sense of importance, and satisfaction of the various
services, programs and courses emanating from our Division.
Secondary
1. Other units outside of the Division will be provided an opportunity to submit
items for the survey.
2. Develop and maintain partnerships with other service and program units.
Survey Goals
•DELTA •Registration & Records
•Adult Credit Programs •Libraries
•Orientation •Many Others
14. 1. Overall DE Experience
2. Technology Resources & Skills
3. Sense of Connection
4. Communication
5. Services and Programs
Survey Topics
15. 1. Census of “Distance Education” population
• All students enrolled in a minimum of one distance
education course during Fall 2003 semester
• N = 2,077
2. Control Group of “On Campus” population
• Students not taking any distance education courses
during Fall 2003 semester
• Matched against census group for gender & ethnicity
• N = 6,190
Methodology – Survey Sample
16. 1. Method
• Web vs. paper
• Online survey (using .asp and MySQL database)
• Paper available (about 10 requests)
2. Correspondence
• Initial invitation
• Two follow-up messages
• Bulk email used for all correspondence
• Email, phone and fax used for troubleshooting
3. Incentive
• Cash rewards via drawings
Methodology – Survey Distribution
25. 1. Purpose for today is not to make a complete report
on the survey data, but rather to set the stage for a
discussion about responding to this new population
in our practice.
2. This survey conducted in November 2003 and
population has already changed; this is just a
snapshot of that time frame. (Survey will be
repeated in November 2005.)
3. Full survey data and previous presentations
available on the website.
Reminders
26. 1. Primary Reason for Taking DE Course
2. Frequency of Campus Visits
3. Reasons for Campus Visits
Section 1: Overall DE Experience
36. 1. Students in course
2. Other students in general
3. Instructor
4. Academic advisor
5. Academic department
6. Faculty in general
7. NC State in general
Section 3: Sense of Connection With…
47. •Academic Advising - Credit Programs Office
•Academic Advising - Faculty Advisors
•Academic Advising - Virtual Advising Center
•All Campus Student ID Card
•Bookstores
•Career Center
•Cashier’s Office
•Center Stage
•Chaplains’ Cooperative Ministry
•Club Sports
•Computing Help Desk - College
Section 5: Services and Programs
•Rating on Importance and Satisfaction
•Computing Help Desk - University
•Counseling Center
•Crafts Center
•Dance Program
•Dining
•Financial Aid
•Fitness/Wellness
•Gallery of Art and Design
•Greek Life
•Gym Facilities
•Health Promotion
48. Section 5: Services and Programs
•Rating on Importance and Satisfaction
•Housing
•Intramural Sports
•Library Services
•Multicultural Student Affairs
•Music
•Orientation
•Online Leadership Development Series
•Outdoor Adventures
•Parents and Families Services
•Physical Education
•Registration & Records
•Student Center
•Student Conduct
•Student Government
•Student Handbook
•Student Leadership, Ethics & Public Service
•Student Health Services
•Student Legal Services
•Student Media
•Student Organizations
•Theatre Programs
•WolfCamp
•Women’s Center
60. Highlights from Survey
•Accurate profile of distance learners
•Success with online survey and bulk email
•Good skills, good connections
•Importance is slippery
•If we build it, they will come
62. DE Planning: Campus Considerations
Enrollment Conundrum
• DE is the supposed solution to already
growing enrollment;
• At the same time, we are actively recruiting
new DE audiences
• military, community colleges, corporate
• “OneCampus” campaign
• Result of straining our resources
63. DE Planning: Campus Considerations
Projected Enrollment
• 9% per year student headcount
(both “pure” and “hybrid”)
• 15% per year student credit hours
(both “pure” and “hybrid”)
65. Administration
1. Deliberate inclusion of courses taught via DE
as part of the tenure review process.
2. Integration of admissions, billing, registration
for courses, registration windows.
3. Integration of tuition and fees model.
DE Planning: Campus Considerations
67. Services & Programs
1. Allocation of funds to Student Affairs (2000)
from DE budget
2. Funds used to create a full-time position
(2001); “Distance Education Coordinator”
now is “Director, DE & Technology Services”
3. Creation of “Distance Education/Technology
Advisory Group” (2002)
DE Planning: Student Affairs Considerations
68. Services & Programs
4. Administration of “DE & Student Affairs
Survey” (2003)
5. Dissemination of Results; Decisions
• Division-wide presentation
• Unit presentations
• Special Requests
• Repeat in 2005
• “Likeliness” groups involved in fee
discussion
DE Planning: Student Affairs Considerations
69. Services & Programs
6. Integration of Fees Model
• Possible new model: per credit hour
• Concern of suddenly serving significantly
larger population
• Concern of managing expectations
• Concern of providing appropriate services
DE Planning: Student Affairs Considerations
71. Perceptions of Distance Learners by…
1. Student Affairs literature: multi-dimensional
learners whose non-curricular needs are likely met
through existing life circumstances
2. Student Affairs practitioners: confusion
3. Student Affairs graduate students: not “real”
students as compared to traditional
4. Distance Learners: in some cases, don’t need
anything beyond basic administrative services;
unaware of potential services not currently
available and/or advertised.
Integrating the DE Population
72. Summary: This is the “invisible” population.
1. Not physically on campus
2. Currently most are not in degree programs (though
that will shift in several years)
3. Not often considered in events, budgeting, planning
(especially in Student Affairs)
4. Separate/not-available services
5. Somewhat analogous to other populations who
were small and marginalized, but are now more
mainstreamed.
Integrating the DE Population
73. Suggestions
•Investigate campus resources
•Figure out how distance education is administered and funded
•Not everybody understands “Distance Education”
•Be aware of the politics
•Be aware that not everyone is committed to serving this population
•Look for data already collected at your institution
75. Assessing the Co-Curricular Needs of Distance Learners:
A Student Affairs Perspective
Leslie A. Dare, Ed.D.
Amanda G. Thomas
Division of Student Affairs
NC State University
Campus Box 7301
Raleigh, NC 27695-7301
919.515.1329
leslie_dare@ncsu.edu
amanda_thomas@ncsu.edu
•This Presentation
http://www.ncsu.edu/student_affairs/naspa05/
•This Project
http://www.ncsu.edu/student_affairs/survey/de.html
•Distance Education & Technology Services (Student Affairs, NC State)
http://www.ncsu.edu/student_affairs/dets/
•Research & Assessment (Student Affairs, NC State)
http://www.ncsu.edu/student_affairs/sara/
•Division of Student Affairs (NC State)
http://www.ncsu.edu/student_affairs/
Editor's Notes
Good morning. I would like to welcome everyone here today to our Division of Student Affairs Retreat. My name is Leslie Dare and I am the Director of DETS in the Division of Student Affairs at NC State University. My co-presenter this morning is Amanda Thomas, who is our graduate assistant in that office We are delighted to have you join us this morning.
Everyone should have a copy of our presentation. If you turn to the last page, you will see our contact information plus several websites. Please feel free to contact us at any time, and to check our websites frequently for updates. This is still a work in progress and we will be posting additional results and analyses in the weeks to come.
Also, we ask that you sign one of our attendance sheets that are going around the room. After the conference, we will email you this final version of the presentation. We will also use email for collecting your feedback. As you can see, the handouts are several pages each, so using email for evaluation purposes will allow us to somewhat make up for the number of trees we’ve killed for this presentation. There are several slides that you will see on the screen, but not in your handout; however, they slides will be in the version we email to you.
Here is what we are going to cover today. For the benefit of our guests who may not be as familiar with the Division of Student Affairs, I will give you a quick snapshot of who we are.
So here is a quick snapshot of the Division of Student Affairs here at NC State.
We are quite a large organization. We have about 35 units with approximately 600 employees.
Our mission is to facilitate the total educational growth and development of NC State students to include personal, social, physical, cultural, leadership, and intellectual development.
Our long standing motto in the Division is “Students First.” This motto guides everything we do in every single service, program, and course we provide for our students.
So why are we talking about distance education in Student Affairs?
Traditionally, the Division of Student Affairs has provided services and programs to campus-based learners. However, Student Affairs recently expanded its target audience to include distance learners for two compelling reasons.
First, the number of distance learners at NC State has grown tremendously in the last five years, with plans to accommodate increases of more than 9% each year for the next five years.
As you can see from this chart, the number of distance learners is growing exponentially.
From Fall 2003 (which was the time of our survey) through the year 2012, we project to have a 22% increase in the number of students enrolled at NC State.
Of that 22%, we are expecting a whopping 302% increase in the number of DE students.
This chart underscores our mandate to meet the needs of this growing population.
The University has an obligation to meet both the curricular and co-curricular needs of this growing population, and furthermore, the Division’s motto, “Students First” does not differentiate between campus-based and distance learners.
As this population has increased and become more identifiable, Student Affairs has welcomed the opportunity to have a positive impact on these students’ learning and development.
Second, in addition to this internal call to meet the needs of distance learners, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) has included student development as an area that should provide services to distance education students.
Specifically, student services are listed as one of the many areas to be addressed by institutions seeking accreditation for distance education programs. Appropriate student development services must be provided for distance learning programs as well as on-campus programs.
In order to respond to these internal and external calls to meet the co-curricular needs of distance learners, the Division of Student Affairs created a “Distance Education Coordinator” position in April of 2001.
This position evolved into the current unit named “Distance Education & Technology Services.” Of the many things we do, our two main priorities are to:
Help our units figure out how to serve distance learners
And to provide technology planning and resource
Looking at this again, we want to underscore the growth of the DE population.
In the Fall of 2003, DE students are 7.42% of the total population.
And in 2012, we project that number to increase to 24.4% of the total.
So DE students will be almost a full quarter of our enrollment by 2012.
(not a lot of data exists, not any other models in Student Affairs; very few attempts to assess.)
Natural partnerships
We worked with our institutional research office to collect our sample. DE Sample was really a census (since we had the resources to attempt to reach them all) and our On Campus sample was selected to match DE Census.
As far as the method of survey distribution, we looked at web versus paper. We confirmed with the de office that all de students utilized email for their course, so electronic distribution made sense for us and the students. We used asp to create the form and MySQL database to collect the responses. We made a paper version available to those who requested and received approximately 10 inquiries.
The initial invitation was sent vial bulk mail. We included in the email a link to the site where the survey was posted. After the first distribution we sent two follow up emails a week apart. We made our email fax and phone number available for any questions and received light requests for help with troubleshooting (about which we were excited).
We also provided an incentive to boost our response rate that was promoted in the original and subsequent emails.
One of the more exciting moments was the immediacy of the results. We were able to view submissions within minutes of the launch of our survey.
DE Students = 37.4% (n = 2,077)
On Campus Students = 31.6% (n = 6,190)
One thing to note is that DE Students received additional follow-up from their faculty. We speculate that their return rate may have been impacted by the relevancy of the topic for that group.
It is interesting to note that there are more women respondents in hybrid and on-campus groups while more men in the pure DE group responded.
An overwhelming number of respondents were white which is not surprising based on the ethnic makeup of our on campus students and region.
As you might expect our distance learners are older than our on-campus students.
Our distance learners were predominantly part-time, where as our on campus learners are primarily full-time. This can be further explained by the next slide.
The “lifelong” category is our “continuing education” population, which are non-degree seeking students. Given that most of our DE courses at this time were not part of full online degree programs, it makes sense that most of the DE students were in the “lifelong” and “part time” categories.
Our first section of the survey presented questions regarding the experiences of distance learners. Please note that these questions were directed only to the DE students and not the on-campus students.
Here we see and inverse relationship between the “pure” and “hybrid” populations related to the frequency of visiting campus.
The top two reasons here are purchase textbooks and take exams.
We were encouraged by the results that all groups were generally satisfied by their computer skills.
We were again surprised and encouraged that DE Students seem to have a faster connection than we would have expected.
Once again, good results here for the quality of their internet connection.
Again, no surprises here with the frequency of their typical internet use. Just a note, it was hard for us to imagine that those who have internet access at home would only connect once a week.
The locations for connecting to internet were home, work, NCSU, Public Library and other and the results were once again, as expected.
All Likert scales are 4-point scales….forced choice to eliminate any neutral responses.
Can choose more than one type
Can choose more than one type
Major portion of the survey
Each service/program rated on Importance and Satisfaction
Satisfaction = A few were statistically significant, but the R-Square was so small that the relationship was essentially meaningless.
Importance = A number were statistically significant.
DE students are deliberately excluded from using these services and programs which are fee-based.
Very Unlikely/Unlikely = 85.48
Likely/Very Likely = 14.53
Very Unlikely/Unlikely = 85.2
Likely/Very Likely = 14.8
Very Unlikely/Unlikely = 79.76
Likely/Very Likely = 20.24
Very Unlikely/Unlikely = 62.18
Likely/Very Likely = 37.83
Very Unlikely/Unlikely = 56.03
Likely/Very Likely = 43.98
Overall, there is a possible theme here that individual activities are more appealing to the distance learning population than group activities.
Very Unlikely/Unlikely = 70.72
Likely/Very Likely = 29.29
Very Unlikely/Unlikely = 72.31
Likely/Very Likely = 27.68
Very Unlikely/Unlikely = 67.62%
Likely/Very Likely = 32.38%
Very Unlikely/Unlikely = 68.17
Likely/Very Likely = 31.83
Very Unlikely/Unlikely = 70.3
Likely/Very Likely = 29.69