This document summarizes a presentation on institutional policy and liability regarding sexual assault on campus. It discusses key policy issues around confidentiality and control, non-disclosure agreements, and running fair hearings. It also reviews relevant legislation and case law from universities in Manitoba, Windsor, and the US. The presentation aims to help institutions balance survivor agency, risk management, and procedural fairness in their policies and practices.
One hour presentation to Ontario public sector institutions that looks at the privacy and security implications the main information flows associated with COVID-19 workplace health and safety.
Here's a one hour presentation to Canadian municipal lawyers on the union right of access to information that arises under labour law and how it has fared against employee privacy claims.
A short presentation to college student affairs administrators on managing students at risk in light of recent health and safety amendments in Ontario.
1 hours presentation to IT security and law enforcement audience on how access to information legislation and related pressures affect public bodies in Canada.
One hour presentation to Ontario public sector institutions that looks at the privacy and security implications the main information flows associated with COVID-19 workplace health and safety.
Here's a one hour presentation to Canadian municipal lawyers on the union right of access to information that arises under labour law and how it has fared against employee privacy claims.
A short presentation to college student affairs administrators on managing students at risk in light of recent health and safety amendments in Ontario.
1 hours presentation to IT security and law enforcement audience on how access to information legislation and related pressures affect public bodies in Canada.
The internet as a corporate security resourceDan Michaluk
One hour presentation to in house lawyers at a federally regulated employer. Analysis is based on Canadian federal privacy legislation (PIPEDA) and Ontario Rules of Professoinal Conduct.
Privacy and breaches in health care - a legal updateDan Michaluk
A 45 minute presentation to hospital administrators in Ontario. A state of the nation address on the legal environment related to data security incidents.
How your nonprofit can avoid data breaches and ensure privacyTechSoup Canada
Increasingly, nonprofits hold large quantities of digital assets (such as donor information, grant application details, financial records, etc.). Organizations of all sizes and industries are being targeted by cyber criminals. Cyber-attacks will often devastate an organization’s operations and have significant financial, legal and reputational consequences.
In this webinar, Imran Ahmad of Miller Thomson, LLP will explain how implementing best practices from a pre-breach standpoint can go a long way to mitigate the negative consequences of a cyber-attack.
What you will learn:
- what the cyber threat landscape looks like
- how to ensure privacy of your digital assets
- steps to take in the aftermath of a cyber-attack
How Your Nonprofit Can Avoid Data Breaches and Ensure Privacy Part 2TechSoup Canada
Part 1 of this webinar series provided an overview of cybersecurity and explained the cyber risks and legislation affecting nonprofits. In part 2 of the series, Imran Ahmad of Miller Thomson, LLP returns to answer your questions on cybersecurity and to delve deeper into cybersecurity maintenance and best practices to avoid data breaches. This includes the implementation of measures to prevent data breaches in the pre-attack phase, to the implementation of security best practices in the event of a cyber attack or breach.
What you will learn:
· How to develop key cybersecurity-related documents;
· How to maintain an internal matrix of when to notify affected individuals;
· How to review contracts from a cybersecurity compliance perspective.
I Know What You Did Last Summer: Workplace Investigations (Series: Protecting...Financial Poise
Now, more than ever, employers must be prepared to promptly and effectively respond to complaints of workplace harassment and/or discrimination. Often, that requires knowing when and how to conduct an internal investigation. Given the significance of the issues often at stake and the potential for a negative outcome (attorneys’ fees, high dollar settlement, negative PR), learning on the fly is not a viable option when undertaking an investigation. This program covers a host of questions, including what sort of issues should be investigated, who should conduct the investigation, what steps should you take and in what order, who should be interviewed, what sort of documents should be created and how do you close out the investigation? It also explores the investigation process and provides guidance from a seasoned investigator as to how to handle the many issues that you will often confront during the course of an investigation.
To listen to this webinar on-demand, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/workplace-investigations-2020/
This slideshow aims to provide you with an understanding of the common issues pertaining to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex students. Some of the areas that will be covered include: common issues, discrimination, bullying, vilification, duty of care and confidentiality & privacy.
The internet as a corporate security resourceDan Michaluk
One hour presentation to in house lawyers at a federally regulated employer. Analysis is based on Canadian federal privacy legislation (PIPEDA) and Ontario Rules of Professoinal Conduct.
Privacy and breaches in health care - a legal updateDan Michaluk
A 45 minute presentation to hospital administrators in Ontario. A state of the nation address on the legal environment related to data security incidents.
How your nonprofit can avoid data breaches and ensure privacyTechSoup Canada
Increasingly, nonprofits hold large quantities of digital assets (such as donor information, grant application details, financial records, etc.). Organizations of all sizes and industries are being targeted by cyber criminals. Cyber-attacks will often devastate an organization’s operations and have significant financial, legal and reputational consequences.
In this webinar, Imran Ahmad of Miller Thomson, LLP will explain how implementing best practices from a pre-breach standpoint can go a long way to mitigate the negative consequences of a cyber-attack.
What you will learn:
- what the cyber threat landscape looks like
- how to ensure privacy of your digital assets
- steps to take in the aftermath of a cyber-attack
How Your Nonprofit Can Avoid Data Breaches and Ensure Privacy Part 2TechSoup Canada
Part 1 of this webinar series provided an overview of cybersecurity and explained the cyber risks and legislation affecting nonprofits. In part 2 of the series, Imran Ahmad of Miller Thomson, LLP returns to answer your questions on cybersecurity and to delve deeper into cybersecurity maintenance and best practices to avoid data breaches. This includes the implementation of measures to prevent data breaches in the pre-attack phase, to the implementation of security best practices in the event of a cyber attack or breach.
What you will learn:
· How to develop key cybersecurity-related documents;
· How to maintain an internal matrix of when to notify affected individuals;
· How to review contracts from a cybersecurity compliance perspective.
I Know What You Did Last Summer: Workplace Investigations (Series: Protecting...Financial Poise
Now, more than ever, employers must be prepared to promptly and effectively respond to complaints of workplace harassment and/or discrimination. Often, that requires knowing when and how to conduct an internal investigation. Given the significance of the issues often at stake and the potential for a negative outcome (attorneys’ fees, high dollar settlement, negative PR), learning on the fly is not a viable option when undertaking an investigation. This program covers a host of questions, including what sort of issues should be investigated, who should conduct the investigation, what steps should you take and in what order, who should be interviewed, what sort of documents should be created and how do you close out the investigation? It also explores the investigation process and provides guidance from a seasoned investigator as to how to handle the many issues that you will often confront during the course of an investigation.
To listen to this webinar on-demand, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/workplace-investigations-2020/
This slideshow aims to provide you with an understanding of the common issues pertaining to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex students. Some of the areas that will be covered include: common issues, discrimination, bullying, vilification, duty of care and confidentiality & privacy.
William Moorehead, President, All Clear Emergency Management Group
Using situational analysis, participants will learn to identify common legal issues in emergency
management and how to enhance response through agreements. This session will examine common
legal issues encountered within emergency management and emergency response including liability and
the formation of mutual aid agreements. The audience will analyze hypothetical scenarios and news
stories to identify potential liability issues. The session will highlight the challenges and barriers to
implementing agreements, benefits of prepositioned contracts, and the importance of putting agreement
in place now before they are needed. The goals of the session are to review the fundamentals of
liability, examine common legal issues, discuss best practices, and analyze situations common in
emergency management.
Identify ethical behavior and myths of ethics
Define the ethical dilemma
Familiar with resolving the dilemma
Identify the process of Ethical decision making
LawSense Conference 2016: Navigating Sexual Issues in SchoolsKerry O'Brien
This presentation aims to provide you with an understanding of laws relating to teenage sexual activity and pregnancy including:
- What are the relevant laws;
- Duty of care;
- Confidentiality and privacy; and
- Ethical obligations.
Education law conference, March 2017 - Manchester - What to do when it all go...Browne Jacobson LLP
This session looked at the rise of regulation and the more proactive approach of the consumer in the 21st century, the school's obligations and what to do when faced with an allegation.
Title IX, Meet Clery, Clery Meet Title IX: Implementing the VAWA AmendmentsMargolis Healy
This presentation from the 24th Annual Legal Issues in Higher Education Conference from October 2014 provides information on Title IX fundamentals, summary of institutional obligations, Clery Act VAWA Amendments, the connections between Title IX and VAWA, new policy requirements, challenges, rule making and next steps.
Justice or Just Us: Understanding Bias and Managing Health Professional Lice...Harry Nelson
Presentation to the National Medical Association on the issue of bias in Medical Board and other health professional licensing and enforcement and recommendations for preventing and managing investigations.
Ecno cyber - 23 June 2023 - djm(137852631.1).pptxDan Michaluk
One hour presentation to IT professionals at Ontario school boards. Covers labour issues in MFA rollout, threat information sharing and business e-mail compromises and PHIPA.
Critical Issues in School Board Cyber SecurityDan Michaluk
An hour presentation to school board officials in Ontario on cyber security issues, covering the threat environment, defense, incident response, threat information sharing and vendor issues.
Privacy, Data Security and Anti-Spam ComplianceDan Michaluk
45 min prez to compliance professionals at Canadian financial institutions. A survey presentation covering privacy, data security and anti-spam (CASL).
I hate the term "breach" - please call it a "security incident" - but the term "breach coach" is certainly ingrained. Posting today's presentation on the role of the coach as I step out the door to an insurance sector event.
Who is the "health information custodian" when an institution with an educational mandate provides health care? PHIPA gives institutions choice. Here's a presentation i gave yesterday in which I argue that the institution (and not its practitioners) should assume the role of the HIC.
Student Conduct Investigations - Examining Evidence and Determining CredibiliityDan Michaluk
A one hour presentation to student conduct investigators at colleges and universities in Canada. Support for the "hard" cases in which credibility is at issue, including hard sexual violence cases.
Presentation to Canadian in-house counsel on data breach response and crises communications. Dan Michaluk and Ian Dick of Hicks Morley and Karen Gordon of Squeaky Wheel Communications.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
ADR in criminal proceeding in Bangladesh with global perspective.
Higher Education Sexual Violence Presentation
1. Presented By
SEXUAL ASSAULT ON CAMPUS
Institutional
Policy and
Liability
Emily Baron, Student
Dan Michaluk, Lawyer
February 22, 2022
2. Institutional Policy and Liability
o Key policy issues
▸ Confidentiality and control
▸ Non-disclosure agreements
▸ Running fair yet low impact hearings
▸ Off-campus investigations
→Resources
Agenda
2
o Legislation
• The current cross-Canada view
• The new Ontario regulation
o Case law
• University of Manitoba
• University of Windsor
• Ryerson University
5. o A complainant acting in good faith, who discloses
or reports sexual violence, would not be subject
to actions for violations of the institution's policies
related to drug and alcohol use at the time the
alleged sexual violence took place.
o During the institution's investigative process,
students who share their experience of sexual
violence through disclosing, accessing support,
and/or reporting to the institution, would not be
asked irrelevant questions by the institution's
staff or investigators. E.g., those relating to past
sexual history or sexual expression.
Ontario addresses “Our Turn” recommendations
The new Ontario regulation
5
7. University of Manitoba – July 2021
7
o Undergraduate medical student expelled for unprofessional conduct after making misogynistic
and hateful postings on Facebook
o Allegations brought, conduct admitted, five apologies received prior to a Progress Committee
recommendation to expel
o Student brings multi-pronged judicial review application – two of four grounds succeed
• No connection, no jurisdiction – reasonable to conclude there was a connection
• Failure to identify 18 anonymous complainants and a full account of complaints – providing number
and a summary was fair in circumstances (which didn’t involve factual dispute)
Reasonable apprehension of bias – Associate Dean acted as investigator, prosecutor and judge (as
a member of the Progress Committee), which poisoned the appeal hearing. Bias was raised but not
addressed and appeal body adopted the submissions of the Associate Dean
Breach of Charter – Charter applies to University of Manitoba, acting as an agent in implementing
government sexual violence policy, but the appeal committee did not balance Charter rights.
,
8. University of Manitoba – July 2021
8
o Policy points from this case
• Policies should shield decision-maker from early and ongoing involvement with disciplinary matters
to protect against appearances of bias
o Practice points from this case
• Affirmation of jurisdiction is not a surprise – don’t fear or shirk jurisdiction to address online harms
• You can keep complainant identities anonymous in some circumstances, arguably, when it goes to
the broader impact on the community
• Charter finding is significant – if your cases raise the respondent’s expressive interests, you must
expressly balance that interest in (a) your finding of misconduct and (b) your penalty assessment
,
9. University of Windsor – April 2021
9
o Acquaintance sexual assault – respondent’s defence is consent
o Survivor applies for review of decision to dismiss complaint
o Facts
• Respondent charged criminally
• Respondent, despite having burden, does not participate or seek adjournment
• Investigator nonetheless dismisses complaint based on credibility analysis
• AVP accepts, and then changes view on appeal to Provost
• Provost sympathetic to complaint, but says they can’t contradict the investigator
• Provost adjourns and says University will follow the outcome of the criminal trial
10. University of Windsor – April 2021
10
o Application allowed – improper delegation of decision-making authority
o Policy points from this case
• Complainants can apply for review if you give them standing by policy (non-traditional)
• Giving investigators the power to draw conclusions can cause problems
- Do you have your investigators gather evidence and comment on witness credibility only?
• Decision makers must decide, and must be confident in making a decision
- Does your policy expressly provide for obtaining confidential legal advice?
o Practice points from this case
• If a respondent doesn’t seek and obtain an adjournment and doesn’t participate, you can and should
consider that in rendering a proper decision, including by drawing an adverse inference
11. Purdue University – June 2019
11
o Acquaintance sexual assault case – former romantic relationship
o Court draws on political narrative – Obama Title IX changes and Facebook post by campus
group – “Alcohol isn’t cause of campus sexual assault. Men are.”
o Dean of Students uses two investigators to prepare a report to committee, but respondent
gets redacted report “moments before”
o Survivor (who did not complain) does not appear, and respondent denied witnesses
o Two of three members state they did not read the report
o They recommend punishment to Dean, also the investigator
o Dean writes cursory findings, including a finding in favour of complainant’s credibility (yet she
had never met with the complainant)
o Affirmed on appeal
12. Purdue University – June 2019
12
o Procedural Fairness
Dean’s role as investigator and decision-maker okay under US law
X Failure to produce report was itself “fundamentally unfair”
X Bias – Dean found Jane was credible without ever meeting her and panel member failed to read
report
X Failure to examine Jane’s credibility (by asking her questions)
X Failure to hear from John’s witness, who claims to have been present
o John makes a prima facie case of discrimination
• “Strongest fact” – the Dean’s “perplexing” credibility finding
• Weight – Institution motivated by Title IX to punish
• Weight – Facebook post by campus group
13. Purdue University – June 2019
13
o This case is about how a conservative judge’s mind works, but there are conservative judges
on our Canadian benches
o Policy points from this case
• Policies should shield decision-maker from early and ongoing involvement with disciplinary matters
to protect against appearances of bias
• Production is at the core of fairness when there is a factual dispute – balance, but be wary of
withholding facts and evidence based on privacy and access to justice interests
o Practice points
• Shows the risks in proceeding with a credibility case without a complainant
• Court doesn’t say cross-examination was necessary, notably, but does say that there needed to be
some questioning from the panel
15. Risk management view
→ A sense of control is central to recovery
and healing after sexual trauma
→ Faculty should be free to employ
biographical writing, self-reflection and
other teaching methods that run a risk of
disclosure
→ Faculty should be trained and required to
help instead of being required to report
(“mandatory supporting, not mandatory
reporting”)
Survivor agency view
Confidentiality and control
15
o Sexual violence is a threat to community
members
o We have a duty to respond reasonably
when there is knowledge of threats
o This duty supersedes the rights of the
survivor
o Survivors can exercise agency in
deciding who to turn to for support
o It is not the role of a faculty member to
counsel, nor are faculty capable of it
16. o Even if balancing is hard, you can’t let that
difficulty result in a lack of policy clarity
o The only true path to agency is informed
decision-making by survivors
o Clarity is the key to informed consent and
effective risk management
o Current policies are very unclear because they
signal disclosures are confidential
o That is not the reality, so there should be a
warning (that is framed as a warning)
o Question is – do you trust (and burden) your
faculty members to conduct a risk analysis?
Institutions are failing to set clear expectations
Confidentiality and control
16
17. NDAs a feature of justice system
→ A sense of control is central to recovery
and healing after sexual trauma
→ NDAs have been abused and used to
silence survivors
→ There is a limited basis to trust the justice
system and its safeguards
▸ Survivors are pressured to settle
▸ The alterative to settle is an abusive legal
process
▸ The protections (counsel, court review) are
also inadequate
NDAs = systemic oppression
Non-disclosure agreements
17
o There is a strong public interest in the
settlement of legal disputes
o Settlements are a way to gain resolution
without the costs and burdens of
litigation, which can be heavy on
survivors
o Defendants will not enter settlements
without the closure secured by an NDA
o Settlements should be fair, and unfair
settlements are not enforceable because
our courts have supervisory jurisdiction
18. o Applies to harassment and discrimination
allegations
o Presumptive ban on “concealing the details
relating to a complaint of harassment or
discrimination”
o Except “if such an agreement is the
expressed wish and preference of the
relevant person concerned”
o AND if certain conditions are met (including
ILA, a waiver opportunity, and a time limit)
o AND a carve out, including a carve out that
permits reporting to law enforcement and
limited disclosures to a prospective
employer
Prince Edward Island law
Non disclosure agreements
18
19. Running fair and low impact hearings
19
o Judges live procedure and are going to judge your practices from that perspective
o The fairness case law is not survivor-centric
o The challenge:
• If you want to strike a different balance, say so in your policy very clearly
• The balance must be struck in the unique circumstances of every case
• This is onerous for laypersons, who need more training – they need to live and breathe fairness
much like lawyers and judges, even without legal training
20. Running fair and low impact hearings
20
o You cannot do without:
1. The burden to prove misconduct based on facts and evidence
- “One who alleges must prove” – you simply cannot assume guilt
- The standard is the balance of probabilities
- If the survivor is the only witness, there is a burden on them that is hard to avoid
- Works both ways – consent is an affirmative defence that must be spoken to by the respondent
2. Fair disclosure of facts and evidence
- You are not helping survivors by promising them you will keep their evidence confidential
- You can withhold and redact at times, but it’s a very case specific analysis
21. Running fair and low impact hearings
21
You can control your hearing to minimize abuse
o Survivor written statements of evidence will help
o The survivor may need to attend and submit to questioning when the statement or part of the
statement is being questioned
• The first question – when is that “necessary” to a fair hearing?
• The second question – how do we achieve fairness?
- Consider having the decision-maker question based on input from the respondent
- Consider screening aids
22. o The University of Windsor case reveals a
hesitancy that policy thinkers have written
about
o If you can’t find the evidence, you may not
be able to pursue discipline, but your duty is
to try
o You do have a power over non-community
members
• Placement agreements
• The power to draw an inference
You have the power and must exercise it
Off-campus investigations
22
24. Reading list
o Tara N Richards et al., “Walking the Tightrope:
Navigating Faculty Status as a Mandatory Reporter
in the #MeToo Era” (2021) 32:3 Journal of Criminal
Justice Education 375.
o Kathryn J. Holland et al., “Reporting is not
Supporting: Why mandatory supporting, not
mandatory reporting, must guide university sexual
misconduct policies” (2021) 118:52 Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences 1.
o Lynn M Daggett, “Student Privacy in the New Title
IX Sexual Misconduct Formal Complaint Process”
(2021) 65 Journal of Law & Education 64.
o Ryerson Centre for Free Expression, Does
Confidentiality Work Against Justice? April, 28,
2021 panel debate.
o Emma Phillips, We cannot insist that sexual assault
survivors ‘go public’ September 25, 2019 Globe
and Mail op ed.
24
o Zaki v University of Manitoba, 2021 MBQB 178
(CanLII), https://canlii.ca/t/jhx7v.
o Doe v the University of Windsor, 2021 ONSC 2990
(CanLII), https://canlii.ca/t/jfjc1.
o Doe v Purdue University, No. 17-3565 (7th Cir.
2019).