One hour presentation to higher education administrators on sexual violence policy. Canadian law.

1. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
National Conference on Sexual Assault for Higher Ed Administrators
Law, Policy and Practice
November 11, 2016
Dan Michaluk

2. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
Dan Michaluk I Partner, Toronto

3. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
Statutory initiatives
• Ontario
(January 8, 2017)
• British Columbia
(May 18, 2017)
• Manitoba – Bill 15
• Nova Scotia – Bill 56
3

4. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
BC and Ontario commonalities
• Themes – accountability, transparency, survivor support
• Stand alone policy required
• Based on consultation with students
• Mandatory 3-year review
• Mandatory annual report to the board
• Provision for provincial data gathering
4

5. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
BC and Ontario differences
British Columbia
• Management-approved
policy
• Content yet to be
prescribed
Ontario
• Board approved policy
• Content heavily
prescribed via regulation
(17 min requirements)
• The OHSA “closure duty”
5

6. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
Ontario requirements that have raised questions
1. Inform students that institution will “appropriately
accommodate” those who are “affected by sexual
violence”
2. State that a victim “may choose not to request an
investigation” and “has the right not to participate in
any investigation that may occur”
6

7. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
Ontario requirements that have raised questions
3. Include a “description of the elements of procedural
fairness” that will be part of the investigation and
decision-making process
4. Include a description of “the rights that participants
may have to legal or other representation”
5. Include an example of interim measures that may be
implemented
7

8. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
The OHSA and closing an investigation
8

9. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
The OHSA and closing an investigation
9
• What does “the results” mean?
• Whether each alleged act (which should be well
defined) occurred as alleged, did not occur, occurred
in a manner different than alleged
• Whether the actions amounted to harassment (or
sexual violence, as applicable)

10. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
The OHSA and closing an investigation
10
• Does “any corrective action” include the punishment
given to the respondent?
• Likely – note the word “any”

11. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
The OHSA and closing an investigation
11
• Does it require us to give the survivor the entire investigation
report. Should we?
• No and no
• Investigation reports are sensitive
• Your investigators need to operate in a zone of privacy
• Be prepared to explain why you do not provide the report

12. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
The OHSA and closing an investigation
• Should we tell a survivor, then, that he or she cannot
disclose what we include in our “closure letter”?
• No
• Consider the content of your letter to be the survivor’s
information
• You can talk to a survivor about the risks of “going public”
with your finding, but be careful in doing so
12

13. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
The OHSA and closing an investigation
13
• Questions for Ontario institutions:
• Is there any principled reason for adopting a different
policy when the OHSA is not engaged?
• If we implement policy that gives students a right to
be informed of punishment given to employees, will it
violate our collective agreements?

14. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
The reluctant survivor
• Is there a duty to investigate a report by a reluctant survivor?
• There may be, and survivors must know
• An institution must balance complainant choice and the
risk to others
• Domestic sexual violence may not represent a
foreseeable risk of harm to others
14

15. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
Confidentiality and its limitation
• Can only promise confidentiality to survivors, witnesses and
others to a degree
• Must use information to investigate and take corrective
action
• Generally, you need to act on what you know
• The exception is a disclosure to a university service provider
who provides health care or who you deem to be providing a
confidential service
15

16. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
Confidentiality and its limitations
16

17. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
Off campus sexual violence
• Institutions can enforce rules that protect their legitimate
interests
• The power to address off-campus student sexual violence is
relatively broad
• Disciplining students for off-campus crimes against non-
community members is risky
• There is a greater power to address the off-duty conduct of
faculty and staff
17

18. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
The investigation and hearing
• Survivor participation in the process is often necessary
• Universities owe respondents a high degree of fairness
• X-examination of the survivor is often a right
• Empower survivors via support in the complaint process
• A capable tribunal will best support survivors
18

19. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
Interim measures
• Take interim measures to meet a survivor’s
demonstrated needs
• Impose summarily and given an opportunity for review
• Have policy that makes clear interim measures are not
disciplinary and should not be understood to be
disciplinary
19

20. National Conference on Campus Sexual Assault
National Conference on Sexual Assault for Higher Ed Administrators
Law, Policy and Practice
November 11, 2016
Dan Michaluk