This document summarizes a webinar on best practices for whistleblower compliance programs. It discusses examining whistleblower statutes to ensure compliance, reviewing best practices for establishing a hotline, and discussing employee training on hotlines and anti-retaliation policies. The webinar examines laws like Sarbanes-Oxley, Dodd-Frank, and the False Claims Act and recommends developing an accessible internal reporting process, promptly addressing complaints, maintaining confidentiality, and documenting all reports and investigations.
2. Hotline Confidential: Is Your Company Using
Best Practices for Whistleblower Compliance?
May 29, 2014
3. Chelsie Chmela
Events Manager
Chelsie.Chemla@ethisphere.com
703.960.2360
We welcome you to submit any questions for the panel through the chat
functions you see on your screen.
HOST
QUESTIONS
MATERIALS You’ll receive a copy of this presentation following the webinar (within a few
days) along with some additional resources. You can also contact us with any
questions at info@convercent.com.
3
4. Hotline Confidential: Is Your Company Using Best
Practices for Whistleblower Compliance?
Thursday, May 29, 2014
32. This webcast and all future Ethisphere webcasts are
available complimentary and on demand for BELA
members. BELA members are also offered complimentary
registration to Ethisphere’s Global Ethics Summit and
other Summits around the world.
For more information on BELA contact:
Brette Baecker
Senior Director, Engagement Services
Brette.Baecker@Ethisphere.com
480.397.2656
Business Ethics Leadership
Alliance (BELA)
33. June 11, 2014
Russian Sanctions: What the U.S. and
OFAC Directives Mean for Global
Companies
All upcoming Ethisphere events can be found
at:
http://ethisphere.com/events/
PLEASE JOIN US FOR
My name is Autumn Lowry and I have worked for the company for over 7 years. At Convercent, we provide easy-to-use ethics and compliance software that gives you predictive analytics to mitigate people risk and safeguard your reputation. Convercent serves customers ranging from large corporations to fast-growing small companies with operations in over 130 countries, and across a variety of industries. I work on the professional services team as a behavioral sciences specialist and manage our investigations team. I received my graduate degree from DU in Forensic Psychology. My areas of expertise include:
I am David Schwartz. I am a partner in the Labor and Employment Group at Skadden, Arps. In my practice, I address many types of employment-related issues. Over the last few years, I have been engaged to address numerous whistleblower claims and investigations. In fact, I am involved in several of these matters currently.
Thank you for joining us today. Autumn and I are happy to discuss Whistleblower Hotlines with you. So we are all on the same page, we are talking about various ways in which employees [though in some cases possibly others] can raise issues on an anonymous basis with their employers.
Before we get to the best practices for using hotlines, we thought it would be helpful to cover some of the reasons why employers have whistleblower hotlines. For some employers, anonymous hotlines are statutorilyrequired (SOX). In other instances, having a complaint procedure may provide an affirmative defense to certain claims. The complaint procedure need not necessarily be anonymous but some employers opt to go that route. Finally, in some cases, employers adopt hotlines because they have determined that having a mechanism for anonymous internal reporting may head off reports to government agencies. These reports may be made by employees for a variety of reasons. Some no doubt are "true believers." Others may be "job protectors." Finally, some are certainly "bounty seekers."
With these thoughts in mind, I will cover the statutory underpinnings for anonymous hotlines. Autumn will address best practice for setting up hotlines as well as training employees on their existence along with the importance of anti-retaliation provisions.
Before we get to the statutory grounds for establishing or at least considering anonymous hotlines, we should answer the question: What is a whistleblower? As the name suggests, it is someone who "blows the whistle" – that is someone who provides information – generally to an employer or government regulator – about an actual or threatened violation of law. In many, though not all, instances the whistleblower need not be correct about the underlying violation. In these cases, it is generally enough that the employee had a good-faith belief of a violation. However, under some statutes, the whistleblower must have been correct in his or her assessment that the complained of conduct actually violated a law.
Once a person engages in protected activity – legal speak for "becomes a whistleblower" – the employer cannot take action against the employee because he or she engaged in the protected activity. There are often legal fights over the extent to which the protected activity has to impact the employer's actions for those actions to give rise to a claim. More often, there are factual disputes over issues such as whether the employer knew the employee was a whistleblower, whether the employer took some adverse action against the employee and whether the employer would have taken the action even absent the protected activity.
Here are a few well known "whistleblowers"
Frank Serpico played by Al Pacino in Serpico
Karen Silkwood played by Merly Streep in Silkwood
Erin Brochovich played by Julia Roberts in Erin Brochovich
Jeffrey Wigand played by Russell Crow in The Insider
Edward Snowden – so famous that he does not need a movie or too busy to sell the movie rights.
SOX was enacted in 2002 in the wake of several high-profile corporate restatement cases including those involving Enron and Worldcom. The statute regulates a wide range of corporate and securities issues at publically traded companies. It also expanded the enforcement authority of the Securities Exchange Commission or SEC.
For our purposes today, it is worth noting that companies covered by SOX are required by Section 301 of SOX (15 U.S.C. § 78j-1(m)(4)) to establish procedures for accepting anonymous complaints. However, tipsters are often known to the employer. Sometimes the nature or wording of the complaint makes it obvious. Sometimes the tipster makes it known that he or she was the whistleblower – either by not making the complaint anonymously or by revealing themselves to be the source as part of the company's investigation, usually while being interviewed.
Claims for retaliation under SOX must be brought before OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Agency. We will get to the reasons why in a few moments. For now, I just want to note that there are strict deadlines for employees to bring SOX claims, for employers to respond to SOX claims and for OSHA to decide them. Without going through all the steps, OSHA decisions can ultimately be appealed to the federal courts. But, OSHA and the courts have very broad remedial power.
Also, I want to note the very recent decision in Lawson v. FMR LLC, in which the US Supreme Court extended SOX whistleblower protections to employees of contractors and subcontractors of public companies. Claimants must allege fraud that implicates the shareholders of publicly held mutual funds to be protected. Still, it sweeps many unsuspecting employers into the scope of the SOX anti-retaliation provisions.
As sure as night follows day, regulation follows economic meltdown. In 2010, Dodd-Frank became the law of the land in the US. It includes a whole host of regulatory changes in response to the Great Recession.
For our purposes today, I want to focus on a few key elements.
1. It expanded coverage to pick up certain private companies.
2.It too includes protections for whistleblowers.
3. Employees may now go straight to federal court with a whistleblower claim. There is no need to file first with OSHA.
4. Perhaps most importantly, Dodd-Frank provides employees with significant incentives to report wrongdoing to the SEC by establishing a bounty program. Under this program, individuals are entitled to 10% to 30% of amounts collected by the SEC based on original information provided by the tipster. There have been several payouts under this program, some of which have been quite substantial.
Returning now to OSHA. OSHA is a government agency that has historically played a significant role in the whistleblowing arena. OSHA is responsible for enforcing the whistleblower provisions of over a dozen statutes, including the OSH Act. Its investigators and administrative law judges are generally experienced in addressing workplace retaliation issues. However, often times, they do not have the experience to address some of the complicated or nuanced accounting issues that come up in SOX cases.
With respect to its real sweet spot, workplace safety and health issues, OSHA requires that employers keep track of workplace injuries, that employees have a way to report workplace injuries and hazards and that people who do report these situations not be subject to retaliation. In this connection, employer must display a poster with an OSHA hotline number.
Sticking with the pure employment arena, federal anti-discrimination laws such as Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act all have anti-retaliation provisions. Neither these statutes nor the EEOC regulations require that employers have anonymous whistleblower hotlines.
But, there are two issues I want to stress on this point. First, adopting and following a complaint procedure can serve as the basis for an affirmative defense to many harassment claims. So, employers have an incentive to establish a procedure for fielding complaints, even if not necessarily on an anonymous basis. Second, many employers successfully avoid liability on underlying claims of discrimination while nevertheless losing – and sometimes losing large amounts – on retaliation claims.
Returning to the world of fraud, the False Claims Act is supposed to protect the federal government from fraud. Like all of the other statutes we have been discussing, it too includes an anti-retaliation provision. It does not require an employer to have an anonymous hotline but, like Dodd-Frank, it does allow tipsters – often employees – to collect up to 30% of a recovery through qui tam actions.
The Office of the Inspector General suggests using a hotline as a means of detecting fraud before it is reported to the government
Chapter 8 of the US Sentencing Commission’s Federal Sentencing Guidelines – Elements of an Effective Compliance Program
Establish and promote a system for employees to report or seek guidance about potential misconduct “without fear of retaliation”
Periodically access the effectiveness of your compliance program; monitoring and reviewing the hotline
34 states
The best way to avoid whistleblower claims is through a culture of compliance. If everyone behaves, there is nothing to complain about. Still, for most large organizations, whistleblowing is all but inevitable.
Investigations are painful.
Disruptive
Take time
Cause anxiety among employees
Can lead to rumors
Expensive
But, ultimately, if done right, investigations can be helpful.
Can correct problems
Can help a company build a defense to lawsuits or government investigations
Government agencies often rely on investigations done by outside counsel in assessing whether to take further regulatory action
With these thoughts, I am happy to turn this over to Autumn.
Choice: offer anonymity, but encourage personal contact. If employees fear retribution,lack of confidentiality, or that concerns will be ignored/will not make a difference the program will likely fail and not be utilized to its full potential
Intake Methods: telephonic helpline, web-based, in-person, comments box/ask a question, fax, mail, email
Cultural Awareness: some cultures are more comfortable submitting issues online or in-person
Also, need to have languages for all individuals (for example India versus ??)
Crucial to address reports in a timely fashion. If reports are mishandled or left unresolved, the program will lose credibility and the value of your hotline will decrease
A well conceived process will minimize missteps with the team and ensure all cases are managed with a level of dedication and sophistication
Well established process with also provide your organization with an affirmative defense.
Transparency and consistency are key elements to creating a sense of fairness and justice within the corporate culture. When possible, companies should share the results of investigations to instill confidence in the issue management process. This will show employees that management takes misconduct seriously and will act on reports.
Stats: type of case, findings, accused parties, locations/departments, investigation length, number of interviews conducted, outcomes (coaching, verbal, written, suspension, termination)
Data Access: limit to required personnel; ensure case management system has audit trails and ability to restrict/add access as needed
Uses: SOX versus everything
Internal versus External Hotline
A solid communication strategy will raise awareness of the hotline service and increase adoption among employees
Plan to communicate the Convercent services frequently, not just when they are first made available. Frequent communications will not only remind employees of the services, but will emphasize the importance of and demonstrate your commitment to them.
Plan to communicate the services in ways that resonate with your employees and how they these services will benefit them. This may require modifying your message by department, geographic location or by job function.
Plan to communicate the Convercent services in multiple formats to ensure everyone is made aware and the communications are not accidentally overlooked. Examples may include email communications, announcements on your intranet site, announcements at company events and/or meetings, updates to your employee handbook, and posters or banners in high traffic areas, training.
Plan to educate management teams on the new services so they can assist in educating their employees and answer any questions that might arise.
Legal protections: best to have a blanket policy for participation in any internal investigation; however, federal law does offer specific protections
Adverse Action: termination, demotion, denying a promotion/overtime, discipline, denial of benefits, failure to hire/rehire, intimidation/making threats, reduce in pay/hours
for more information check out our website and Convercent.com
If you found today’s topic and content interesting, follow me on twitter and check out our website for more upcoming webinars.
Are there any questions today before we sign off