Science of Time and the Theory of Everything
•
1 like•546 views
Science Of Time And The Theory Of Everything" by author Bhausaheb Bhosle includes final constants (solution).
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
![Science of Time and the Theory of Everything
68
10,53,35,640 3,16,00,69,200 94,80,20,76,000 28,44,06,22,80,000
Saturn ( 1,46,568 )
21,98,520 6,59,55,600 1,97,86,68,000 59,36,00,40,000
Moon's apsis ( 4,88,203 )
73,23,045 21,96,91,350 6,59,07,40,500 1,97,72,22,15,000
Moon's node ( 2,32,238 )
34,83,570 10,45,07,100 3,13,52,13,000 94,05,63,90,000
Asterisms ( 15,82,237,828 )
23,73,35,67,420 7,12,00,70,22,600 2,13,60,21,06,78,000 64,08,06,32,03,40,000
3rd chart Rotation x 15 x 30 x 30 x 30
Moon ( 3,24,000 )
48,60,000 14,58,00,000 4,37,40,00,000 1,31,22,00,00,000
Moon apsis ( 38,32,8484 )
57,49,27,260 17,24,78,17,800 5,17,43,45,34,000 1,55,23,03,60,20,000
Moon node ( 805,72,864 )
1,20,85,92,960 36,25,77,88,800 10,87,73,36,64,000 3,26,32,00,99,20,000
Mercury ( Conjunction ) ( 10,43,209 )
1,56,48,135 46,94,44,050 14,08,33,21,500 4,22,49,96,45,000
Venus ( Conjunction ) ( 26,64,637 )
3,99,69,555 1,19,90,86,650 35,97,25,99,500 10,79,17,79,85,000
Sun (43,31,500 )
6,49,72,500 1,94,91,75,000 58,47,52,50,000 17,54,25,75,00,000
Mars ( 81,46,909 )
12,22,03,635 3,66,61,09,050 1,09,98,32,71,500 32,99,49,81,45,000
Jupiter ( 51,375,764 )
77,06,36,460 2,31,19,09,380 6,93,57,28,14,000 2,08,07,18,44,20,000
Saturn ( 127,668,255 )
1,91,50,23,825 57,45,07,14,750 17,23,52,14,42,500 5,17,05,64,32,75,000
Asterism ( 2,59,890,012 )
3,89,83,50,180 1,16,95,05,05,400 35,08,51,51,62,000 10,52,55,45,48,60,000
Universe ( 18,712,080,864,000,000)
2nd chart
Revolution
x 15 x 30 x 30 x 30 2nd Chart Rotation x 15 x 30 x 30 x 30
sun's
apsis (
387 )
5,805 1,74,150
52,24,500 15,67,35,000 Mars ( 214 )
3,210 96,300 28,89,000
8,66,70,000
Mars
( 204 ) 3,060 91,800
2,75,400 8,26,20,000 Mercury ( 488 )
7,320 2,19,600 6,58,800
19,76,40,000
Mercury
( 368 ) 5,520 1,65,600
49,68,000 14,90,40,000 Jupiter ( 174 )
2,610 78,300 23,49,000
7,04,70,000
Jupiter
( 900 ) 13,500 4,05,000
1,21,50,000 36,45,00,000 Venus ( 903 )
13,545 4,06,350 1,21,90,500
36,57,15,000
Venus
( 535 ) 8,025 2,40,750
72,22,500 21,66,75,000 Saturn ( 662 )
9,930 2,97,900 89,37,000
26,81,10,000
Saturn
( 39 ) 585 17,550
5,26,500 1,57,95,000
III. CONCLUSION
Galaxy is an egg.
REFERENCES
[1]. Ancient book Surya-Siddhanta, Rig Veda.]()
Recommended
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
journal publishing, how to publish research paper, Call For research paper, international journal, publishing a paper, IJERD, journal of science and technology, how to get a research paper published, publishing a paper, publishing of journal, publishing of research paper, reserach and review articles, IJERD Journal, How to publish your research paper, publish research paper, open access engineering journal, Engineering journal, Mathemetics journal, Physics journal, Chemistry journal, Computer Engineering, Computer Science journal, how to submit your paper, peer reviw journal, indexed journal, reserach and review articles, engineering journal, www.ijerd.com, research journals,
yahoo journals, bing journals, International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, google journals, hard copy of journal
My Research Basic Questions (III)
This paper summarizes the main questions in following:
From Paper No. 98 "No Random Process Causes S. Group Creation (No Big Bang)
To paper No. 55 Earth Axial Tilt
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one (II)
Paper Hypotheses
(I)
2737 is A Real Astronomical Phenomenon
(II)
2737 cycle depends on Pluto Motion Concept
(III)
2737 Cycle is effected by Uranus Motion
Pluto Motion Concept (Revision)
- Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels for 1 second only
- This light motion energy causes a planet to move for 1 solar day
- (Specifically) Light Motion for 1 second causes Pluto to move 1 solar day
- Pluto motion for 1 solar day causes Solar Planets Creation Process
- Pluto moves -during a solar day- a distance = 406000 km
- That's why Pluto Motion Daily =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
Based on this description …
A = (light motion for 1 second) /(Pluto motion for 1 solar day)
Conclusion
The Rate (A=2.8571) Controls Solar Group Basic Data
Earth and Moon Motions Interaction
Paper Question
Why the moon orbital circumference =Earth Motion distance during 1solar day?
- This question was the first one I have faced in the moon orbital motion- may try to solve it in following….
- Planet motion depends on light motion based on the hypothesis (1 second of light motion causes Planet motion for 1 solar day), this hypothesis creates the 1st rate of time in the solar system which is (1 second of light = 1 day of planet)
- The 1st rate of time dominates any planet motion – but – in the Earth Moon Orbit, this rate is changed by Venus & Mars Motions Effect
- (86400 = 237 x 365), where 237 = (Venus rotation period/ Mars rotation period) and 365 =(Earth orbital circumference /the moon orbital circumference)
- Venus & Mars Motions Interaction cause to remove the rate (237) from the previous equation- and because of that (1 day on the sun = 365 days on Earth) and that causes the moon orbital circumference = Earth motion distance daily
But
- The moon circumference shows also this same rate, as we have concluded that from (10921 km the moon circumference x 86400 seconds = 940 mk) This equation tells that, if Earth revolves around the sun a complete revolution in one Solar Day Only, so the moon circumference in this case will equal the Earth motion distance during 1 second…means the rate (1 is equivalent to 365) is seen again in the moon circumference as we have seen it in the moon orbit..!
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part II)
Paper Hypothesis
The moon moves with 2 different velocities – Why? ….Because
The moon is a light beam his velocity is The Light Known Velocity (0.3mkm/s)
And
The moon orbit is created of light beam also (Light Supposed Velocity 1.16 mkm/s)
The moon passing through his orbit causes light coherence, creating the matter to be created (The Moon Planet Creation)
i.e. The moon was a light beam before to enter his orbit around Earth and becomes A Planet moves by masses gravity when he enters the orbit
i.e. The Moon Moves By 2 Rates Of Time Because He Moves 2 Different Motions – Moves As A Light Beam And As A Planet.
What does prove the moon motion as a light beam?
10921 km (moon circumference) x 27.3 days (moon orbital period) = 0.3 mkm
This equation tells -If the moon rotates around his axis one rotation daily, he will pass during his orbital period a distance = light motion (0.3mkm/s) for 1 second!
10921 km (moon circumference) x 86400 seconds (solar day)= 940 mkm
This equation tells- If Earth revolves around the sun one complete revolution in 1 solar day – so the moon circumference will = its motion for 1 second
The equations geometrical mechanism is hard to be explained – but the light velocity effect is seen (And need deep discussion to discover it)
My Research Basic Arguments (Part II):
The Argument (No. 10)
The Planets move one unified motion, as the train moves with its carriages, So, the solar system moves with its planets together one unified motion.
This Argument can be concluded from the 1st Argument "Lorentz Transformations proves "Particle Data Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion"
So
If Particle data is a function of its motion , that proves the claim, "the planets move together one unified motion"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part VI)
We still try to understand the data…
(1)
Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods =3 Mercury rotation periods
(2)
Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 Saturn Orbital Distances
(3)
Also I have claimed that
Moon Daily Displacement 88000 km is used As 2 x 88000 km
Shortly
Why The Rate 2: 1 Is Found In The Solar System Geometry?
Paper Hypothesis
Mercury Periods Data causes The Moon Daily Displacement 88000 km to be used in double value = 2 x 88000 km
The Moon Daily Displacement (88000 km) effects On Mercury Periods Data
Solar system motion analysis (i)
Solar System Motion Analysis (I)
Abstract
Paper Hypotheses
Hypothesis No. (1)
"Solar System has One Unified Motion-
i.e.
All Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion"
This motion is similar to a train motion –as the train moves with all carriages together
The Solar System moves With All Planets Together One Unified General Motion. Although the Planets Velocities are different from each other – that can't disprove the hypothesis – where we see simply in any machine of gears how the gears move with different velocities but all gears together produce one general cooperative motion.
Hypothesis No. (2)
Energy is transported Through the Solar system
Resulting of Solar System Energy Transportation
(1) Planets data is created
(2) Planets Motions became one unified motion
Recommended
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
journal publishing, how to publish research paper, Call For research paper, international journal, publishing a paper, IJERD, journal of science and technology, how to get a research paper published, publishing a paper, publishing of journal, publishing of research paper, reserach and review articles, IJERD Journal, How to publish your research paper, publish research paper, open access engineering journal, Engineering journal, Mathemetics journal, Physics journal, Chemistry journal, Computer Engineering, Computer Science journal, how to submit your paper, peer reviw journal, indexed journal, reserach and review articles, engineering journal, www.ijerd.com, research journals,
yahoo journals, bing journals, International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, google journals, hard copy of journal
My Research Basic Questions (III)
This paper summarizes the main questions in following:
From Paper No. 98 "No Random Process Causes S. Group Creation (No Big Bang)
To paper No. 55 Earth Axial Tilt
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one (II)
Paper Hypotheses
(I)
2737 is A Real Astronomical Phenomenon
(II)
2737 cycle depends on Pluto Motion Concept
(III)
2737 Cycle is effected by Uranus Motion
Pluto Motion Concept (Revision)
- Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels for 1 second only
- This light motion energy causes a planet to move for 1 solar day
- (Specifically) Light Motion for 1 second causes Pluto to move 1 solar day
- Pluto motion for 1 solar day causes Solar Planets Creation Process
- Pluto moves -during a solar day- a distance = 406000 km
- That's why Pluto Motion Daily =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
Based on this description …
A = (light motion for 1 second) /(Pluto motion for 1 solar day)
Conclusion
The Rate (A=2.8571) Controls Solar Group Basic Data
Earth and Moon Motions Interaction
Paper Question
Why the moon orbital circumference =Earth Motion distance during 1solar day?
- This question was the first one I have faced in the moon orbital motion- may try to solve it in following….
- Planet motion depends on light motion based on the hypothesis (1 second of light motion causes Planet motion for 1 solar day), this hypothesis creates the 1st rate of time in the solar system which is (1 second of light = 1 day of planet)
- The 1st rate of time dominates any planet motion – but – in the Earth Moon Orbit, this rate is changed by Venus & Mars Motions Effect
- (86400 = 237 x 365), where 237 = (Venus rotation period/ Mars rotation period) and 365 =(Earth orbital circumference /the moon orbital circumference)
- Venus & Mars Motions Interaction cause to remove the rate (237) from the previous equation- and because of that (1 day on the sun = 365 days on Earth) and that causes the moon orbital circumference = Earth motion distance daily
But
- The moon circumference shows also this same rate, as we have concluded that from (10921 km the moon circumference x 86400 seconds = 940 mk) This equation tells that, if Earth revolves around the sun a complete revolution in one Solar Day Only, so the moon circumference in this case will equal the Earth motion distance during 1 second…means the rate (1 is equivalent to 365) is seen again in the moon circumference as we have seen it in the moon orbit..!
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part II)
Paper Hypothesis
The moon moves with 2 different velocities – Why? ….Because
The moon is a light beam his velocity is The Light Known Velocity (0.3mkm/s)
And
The moon orbit is created of light beam also (Light Supposed Velocity 1.16 mkm/s)
The moon passing through his orbit causes light coherence, creating the matter to be created (The Moon Planet Creation)
i.e. The moon was a light beam before to enter his orbit around Earth and becomes A Planet moves by masses gravity when he enters the orbit
i.e. The Moon Moves By 2 Rates Of Time Because He Moves 2 Different Motions – Moves As A Light Beam And As A Planet.
What does prove the moon motion as a light beam?
10921 km (moon circumference) x 27.3 days (moon orbital period) = 0.3 mkm
This equation tells -If the moon rotates around his axis one rotation daily, he will pass during his orbital period a distance = light motion (0.3mkm/s) for 1 second!
10921 km (moon circumference) x 86400 seconds (solar day)= 940 mkm
This equation tells- If Earth revolves around the sun one complete revolution in 1 solar day – so the moon circumference will = its motion for 1 second
The equations geometrical mechanism is hard to be explained – but the light velocity effect is seen (And need deep discussion to discover it)
My Research Basic Arguments (Part II):
The Argument (No. 10)
The Planets move one unified motion, as the train moves with its carriages, So, the solar system moves with its planets together one unified motion.
This Argument can be concluded from the 1st Argument "Lorentz Transformations proves "Particle Data Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion"
So
If Particle data is a function of its motion , that proves the claim, "the planets move together one unified motion"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part VI)
We still try to understand the data…
(1)
Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods =3 Mercury rotation periods
(2)
Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 Saturn Orbital Distances
(3)
Also I have claimed that
Moon Daily Displacement 88000 km is used As 2 x 88000 km
Shortly
Why The Rate 2: 1 Is Found In The Solar System Geometry?
Paper Hypothesis
Mercury Periods Data causes The Moon Daily Displacement 88000 km to be used in double value = 2 x 88000 km
The Moon Daily Displacement (88000 km) effects On Mercury Periods Data
Solar system motion analysis (i)
Solar System Motion Analysis (I)
Abstract
Paper Hypotheses
Hypothesis No. (1)
"Solar System has One Unified Motion-
i.e.
All Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion"
This motion is similar to a train motion –as the train moves with all carriages together
The Solar System moves With All Planets Together One Unified General Motion. Although the Planets Velocities are different from each other – that can't disprove the hypothesis – where we see simply in any machine of gears how the gears move with different velocities but all gears together produce one general cooperative motion.
Hypothesis No. (2)
Energy is transported Through the Solar system
Resulting of Solar System Energy Transportation
(1) Planets data is created
(2) Planets Motions became one unified motion
Why Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods = 3 Mercury Rotation Perio...
The paper title provides a clear question… and I wish to provide the answer directly
Why Mercury Day Period =2 Mercury orbital periods =3 Mercury rotation periods?
Because
1- Mercury moves during its Day Period (175.94 solar days) a distance = 720.7 mkm= Mercury Jupiter Distance
2- In Jupiter full revolution around the sun (360 degrees) the distance 720.7 mkm is seen 2 times along Jupiter orbital diameter – that means – a distance = 1441.4 mkm – and Mercury moves this distance in 2 Mercury Days (=351.9 solar days)
3- We know that – the solar system is one building each planet is a part of it – and the solar system moves as a train (all carriages move together) – similar to that all planets move together in one unified motion – the planets velocities difference doesn't disprove this idea because planets velocities are complementary to each to produce one unified general motion as any machine of gears
4- The solar system moves (All Planets Together) a distance = 1433.5 mkm = Saturn orbital distance Per A Solar Day
5- So Mercury Motion Distance during 2 Mercury Days = The Solar System motion distance in 1 Solar Day – that supports the claim "2 Mercury Days Are Used To Produce 1 Solar Day"(Please review Mercury Day Period (Short Discussion) (I &II) (The Links are In Paper References)
i.e.
6- Mercury moves during 2 Mercury days (=351.9 solar days) a distance =Saturn Orbital Distance =1433.5
7- We have agreed that – Uranus Orbital Distance is created as 2 days of the solar system motion – and we have suggested that – the solar system geometry building needs 2 days of the solar system motion – means – needs 2872.5 mkm = Uranus Orbital Distance – and to pass 2872.5 mkm Mercury has to move along 4 Mercury Days period (703.76 solar days)
8- Again in full revolution Uranus orbital distance is used 2 times along Uranus orbital diameter where the total distance = 2872.5 mkm x 2 = 5745 mkm – to pass this distance Mercury has to move a long 8 Mercury Days (1407.6 solar days)
9- Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours! What’s going on here?!!
Why does Earth Moon Orbit regress?
Why does Earth Moon Orbit regress?
Abstract
Earth Moon regresses yearly 19 degrees which means 1.44 degrees per month (Lunar nodes are moving west by about 19° per year)
Paper Hypotheses
1. Moon Orbit Regression proves that "Energy is Transported from Point to another through the solar system"
2. Moon Orbit Regression Energy is transported from Pluto to Uranus to Mercury to Earth Moon Orbit
3. Moon Orbit Regression is A Solar Group General Motion.
i.e.
- Solar Group is one building and each planet is a part of it. or Solar Group is one machine and each planet is a gear of it.
- Based on that – Solar Planet Motion is not individual or independent motion – on the contrary – all solar planets move together as a train moves with all its carriages
(although solar planets move by different velocities from each other – but they together consist one general motion)
The paper tries to prove these facts
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time) (II)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth
We still try to prove this same hypothesis we have suggested in the previous paper
Let's explain the proving process as simple as possible:
- I suppose there are 2 different rates of time in the solar system motion – Where (1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth) – how to prove this hypothesis??
- We have 2 method to do that:
- (1st Method) to use Lorentz Transformation by creating Time dilation which enable different rates of time to be produced – but at first we need to prove that there are relativistic effects in the solar system and to define the high velocity motion which causes these relativistic effects – and I have proved that, there are relativistic effects in the solar system in my previous papers
- (2nd Method) to use the solar system geometrical necessities – let's explain this idea as possible in following:
o If there are 2 rates of time in the solar system as I claim, and if the solar system is one machine or one building as I suppose that means this one building has 2 rates of time
o That will necessitate to create the planets data in proportionality with both rates of time otherwise the machine can't work
o This is similar to use 2 different size gears in one machine, to do that, we have to uses some other gears their dimensions be in proportionality with BOTH gears otherwise the machine will not work…
o This is the idea I try to use, suggesting that, if there are different rates of time in the solar system, that necessities the planets data to be created in Proportionality with Both Rates of time – and because of that we can conclude there both rates of time by these planets data analysis
o This paper tries to prove that, the planets data are created by their values because (1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth circumference
- The Energy is found alone before any Matter Creation
- A general Energy is found before the solar planets creation (I called this Energy "The Mother Energy")
- This mother Energy creates the solar planets matters (Mass) and orbital distances (Space)
- The Mother Energy forces the solar planet to move following her motion, So the planet follows the Energy Motion trajectory (with different rate of time)
That answers the question
- Why Earth circumference =40080 km?
Why Mercury Day Period = 4222.6 hours? (II)
-There's a light beam travels with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec
-The Solar System is a puppets theater – the planets move together one unified motion as a train carriage
-The solar system unified motion depends on a period = 8 Mercury Day Periods =1407.6 solar days
-The planets unified motion main cycle (1461 days) depends on the period 1407.6 days (=8 Mercury Day Periods)
-The solar system is a machine moves to create different rates of time - so a planet cycle uses the second period to create the minute period –another cycle uses the minutes to create the hour period, and another uses the hours to create the solar day …..etc
- For example Mercury 8 days period (1407.6 solar days) is used as its rotation period (1407.6 hours) –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Moon Orbital Motion Analysis
Moon Motion Details
- Earth Moon is The Solar Group Energy Indicator
- Earth Moon moves with 2 different motions – they together create the moon motion distance =2.58 mkm = Earth motion daily
- The Moon first Motion is (The Train Motion Concept) –
Let's explain it in following
- The Solar System is a theater of puppets – puppets move by outer force- which cause their motion
- The solar planets move together in one unified motion as a train moves with all its carriages (a planet = a carriage) (The Train Motion Concept)
- The Moon Second Motion is Masses Gravity Motion which causes the moon daily displacement (88000 km)
- The solar system geometrical mechanism uses the moon motion (88000 km) (Moon Displacement daily) to produce the distance (2 x 88000 km) – where this distance is required to make the moon motion daily =2.58 mkm = Earth Motion daily
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- This paper shows one more application using the previous rule … let's remember how we have concluded this rule in following
1. I have discussed light motion features in Planet motion
2. To explain these features of light motion, I had to provide the 1st hypothesis which tells (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
3. Then we needed to extent the discussion so I have added the 2nd hypothesis which tells (Light motion for 1 second causes Planet Motion for 1 solar day)
4. 2nd hypothesis tells us that, there are different rates of time in the solar system motion, so we have tried to discover these different rats of time through planets data analysis
5. then I have discovered this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) this rule tells us, Planets move equal distances to create different rates of time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth motion produces the moon orbit
Abstract
Earth Motion Energy produces the Moon Orbit based on The relativistic Motion
Example for Explanation:
In Lorentz Length contraction Equation
If
- Lo = Earth Daily Motion = 2.58 million
- v= 0.99 c (Earth hidden velocity- Hypothesis)
- L = 363000 km (the distance between Earth and moon at Perigee Point)
- Lo= 7.09 L
That means
Earth Energy Motion moves toward the moon and builds the moon orbit by this Energy
(that proves Earth has a hidden velocity =0.99c)
The Basic Concept
The Solar Group is consisted of one unified Energy, which passes and transports from point to another through the solar group
This unified Energy creates the solar planets matters, orbital distances and motions
Means the whole group is connected together by the same line of Energy, that's why we should consider the solar group as one body
So if the moon orbit is built by Earth motion energy (as we'll study in this paper)
That will be an example for the whole solar group,
the solar group can be similar to a river has many canals, each canal effects on the others
also
the solar group can be similar to group of gears, each gear effects on the others motions,
In Brief
I claim, The Solar groups is an integrated and cooperated system
The components of this system are created by an unified Energy, where this same unified Energy is transported from point to another through the solar group to cause the creation and motion of all these components and no solar component is found out of this Energy
(Solar components means the solar planets masses, orbital distances …and all other data)
Jupiter Effect On Pluto Motion
Paper Basic Question
Why do we analyze Jupiter Data and effect on different Planets?
Because
I try to prove that,
-The planets motions are light motions but we see them motions in planets motions form
-It's a light beam which causes the planets to move in front of us in the sky
-There's no gravity from the sun, there's no Big Bang theory – No more imaginations
-It's A Light Beam Motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth and Moon Motions Interaction (III)
Paper Questions
How to describe the Moon Motion Trajectory?
Let's review our conclusions in following:
- The research 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- The research 2nd one (light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 day)
- The 2nd hypothesis tells that there are different rates of time in the solar system,
- The basic rule tells (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
The Moon Orbital Motion Trajectory:
- Earth moves per solar day a distance =2.58 million km with an angle =0.985 deg on the horizontal line, the moon moves a very similar motion to Earth motion
- If there's no (Lorentz Length Contraction phenomenon) in the solar system, the moon motion would be as a parallel line to Earth motion trajectory … but
- Because of the contraction rate (1.0725) the moon motion distance daily (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be 2.41 mkm
- The difference (2.58 mkm -2.41 mkm) is a distance required necessary to be added to the moon motion distance to save the moon and Earth motions accompanying.
- 0.17 mkm is required to be passed daily
- The moon moves daily a displacement =88000 km depending on Earth Gravity
- But, Earth Mass = The 4 Inner Planets Masses Total (error 1%)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part IV)
Why Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods= 3 Mercury Rotation Periods?
We still discuss this question whose discussion is started in the previous paper
"Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 Saturn Orbital Distances"
Also we try to know If the previous relationship has any effect of Mercury Data
We complete the same discussion (in previous parts of the same series
The solar day production
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Matter Creation Principle (Part IV)
Let's remember our main argument in this papers series "Matter Creation Principle"
I have claimed the following:
(1) Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels for 1 second period only
(2) Light Motion for 1Second causes Planet to move for 1 solar day
(3) Based on Planet motion for 1 solar day – Solar Planets are created…
(4) Specifically – Pluto motion for 1 solar day is a result of light motion for 1 second period (light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec) and based on Pluto motion for 1 solar day – the planets diameters are created that's why Pluto Motion Distance Daily = 406000 km= Planets Diameters Total
But
(5) We have discovered that Earth Moon Orbit defines solar Planets diameters Where
a. Apogee Radius = Solar Planets Diameters Total
b. Perigee Radius = Outer Planets Diameters Total
c. Apogee–Perigee Distance =inner planets diameters total =Earth Circumference
(6) Based on the previous data we have concluded that (1st Conclusion) Pluto and Earth Moon together effect on Solar Planets Diameters Creation process (2nd Conclusion) light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec is sent from Pluto to Earth causes the Earth Axial Tilt (23.45degrees)
Also
(7) We have discovered that 2 Jupiter Diameters +1 Saturn Diameter = Solar Planets Diameters Total =406000 km
(8) i.e. Jupiter Diameter = 8 Planets Diameters Total
(9) These relationships are depended also on light beam velocity 1.16 mkm /sec
What we need to do in this paper?
The previous claim is a heavy one, so we need to discuss (1st) More Proves & Details (2nd) How does this machine work?
Let's start immediately…
Please Note
Paper Methodology is mentioned in "Matter Creation Principle (Part III)"
Metonic cycle proves,, solar planets motions depend on their cooperation,, (1)
I provide a new vision for the solar group
The solar planets existence and motions depend on their cooperation with each other
This vision in fact contradicts the solar group current vision…
For example, the current vision refuses to have any relationship between Earth and Pluto because of the great distance between them, where the gravity force depends on the masses and decreases with the squared distance…
My vision, on contrary, uses the Energy as source for Matter and Distance, means, the matter is created from Energy as the Equation E=mc2 tells us, and the distance is created from Energy which is my hypothesis…
That means, the solar group is created from one energy
Let's imagine that the solar group is similar to a creature body, now the same blood in this body goes to all members and connect all these members by this same blood
So, Earth is connected with Pluto by the same energy which creates the matter and distance
The main advantage in my vision or about the solar group is The Cooperation Between The Solar Planets…
Metonic Cycle which is a cycle of Earth Moon extends for 19 sidereal years = 6939.75 days provides us a good proof for my claim
So, we shall see in this paper, how Metonic Cycle can be seen as energy transports from point to another point through the solar which proves and supports my point of view.
In fact that adds more extension for our thinking about the solar group and provides a great background for Metonic Cycle which is done by the Moon without explanation, where Earth doesn't rotate this cycle which answers our old question, if the planet moves by gravity and the moon under the Earth gravity, how does the moon rotate the Metonic Cycle which the Earth (his parent) doesn't?
Actually my vision provides new knowledge for the solar group where we'll use the cooperation between the solar planets as a real factor to perform their existence and motions
Note Please/
Metonic Cycle period = 6939.75 days
= 19 x 365.25 days (19 sidereal years)
= 235 x 29.53 days (235 Synodic Months)
= 20 x 346.6 days (20 nodal years)
The previous data tell that, there's a harmony between Earth, Moon and Moon orbit motions? why? We try to answer this question in this paper…
The Moon Motion Basic Equation
- I have discovered The Earth Moon Basic Equation
- I call it (Gerges equation for the moon orbital motion)
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
The Equation Concept
- I claim, the moon original motion is an identical to The Earth one, i.e. the moon moves daily a distance 2.58 mkm with an angle 0.985 deg. on the horizontal line.
- The moon motion daily rest angle (13.18 deg -0.985 deg= 12.195deg), it's created by of the moon daily displacement (88000 km)
- The moon daily motion depends on the angle (0.985 deg) as Earth motion, each day Earth adds (0.985 deg) to its revolution around the sun (till 360 degrees)
- But, Why the moon uses (The angle θ) in its motion? because
- The moon daily displacement (88000km) isn't used as a real displacement through the moon orbit, instead, the moon uses this value (88000 km) to create another real displacement suitable with the moon orbit radius… because of that, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its motion. the moon displacement (88000km) will be used as the right triangle hypotenuse, where the real displacement is (L =88000 cos θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Moon Orbital Motion Analysis (II)
The Moon orbital Motion Direction is defined based on the following factors:
1- Masses Gravity forces definition for the moon motion direction is correct.
But
2- The moon principle motion is done similar to Earth motion – i.e. a motion on straight line inclining with 0.985 degrees per solar day
3- Because Earth motion =2.58 mkm and moon motion becomes 2.41 mkm –this difference in velocities causes the motion in straight line to be seen in parabola
So – points 2 & 3 should be taken into consideration before using Masses gravity to define the moon orbital motion direction
4- Venus effect on the moon orbit causes its regression 19 degrees yearly and that effect on the moon orbital motion
5- Saturn and Uranus interaction effects on the moon orbital motion and defined the moon motion main points
That means
There are 5 factors effect on the moon orbital motion direction
Is There A Parallel Universe
Paper Hypothesis
The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
We see the planet moves and thinks that the planet moves by the masses gravity forces – but in fact there's a light beam moves behind the planet and this light motion causes the planet motion-
Think about the Water wheel deeply and carefully –The water wheel is formed in a circle form has edges – and the water wheel is fixed by axis provides the chance for the water wheel to rotate around its axis
Now
The water moves on the ground in one direction pushing the water wheel edges and caused the water wheel to be rotated around its axis –
Here we have 2 motions
The water motion and the water wheel motion – both are in different directions – one motion is continuous and directed in one direction (the water) and the other motion is rotation motion around axis (the water wheel)
The water motion expresses the light motion and the water wheel motion expresses The Planet Motion –
So We Have 2 Parallel Motions - That's Why We Have 2 Parallel Universes
But we realize that these 2 motions depend on the water motion (the light motion) – that because the light motion is the distance creator and energy provider – where the planet motion is a result of the light motion
The paper tries to prove this fact.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)
Abstract
Mercury Day = 4222.6 hours, Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours and Mercury orbital period = 88 days
I claim the following:
- These three cycles are related to each other
- These three cycles depend on Jupiter Uranus distance (2095 mkm)
- Please remember that, Earth moon Metonic Cycle also depends on Jupiter Uranus distance which makes these 4 cycles are related to each other
By proving the previous claim I try to support my basic claim in all my papers that:
The Solar Group is one machine or one body, each planet should be considered as a gear in this machine or as a member in this body.
i.e.
No Planet Motion is Found Independent From Other Planets Motions
The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis
Paper hypothesis
There's Another Force Effects On The Moon Motion Trajectory
(This Force Is = Earth Gravity Force, and effect on the trajectory other side)
- I have discovered this force by analysis the Earth moon motion data,
- This Force Is Originated By The 4 Inner Planets Masses Total, (because the 4 inner planets masses total = Earth mass "with difference only 1%")
- And… because the planets are on far distances from the moon, I have concluded that, there's an electric field controls the inner planets and enable the 4 inner planets masses to practice its gravity on the moon motion trajectory
- This electric field depends on the planets different charges, where this electric field hypothesis is discussed in the previous paper…
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses the proves of this second force existence and effect on the moon motion trajectory, and analyzes this force point effect and its different properties.
- The paper also analyzes the moon motion trajectory, trying to discover it.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Nature Of Time
This is a novel approach on unifying the current divergent theories on how the whole universe is built.
More Related Content
What's hot
Why Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods = 3 Mercury Rotation Perio...
The paper title provides a clear question… and I wish to provide the answer directly
Why Mercury Day Period =2 Mercury orbital periods =3 Mercury rotation periods?
Because
1- Mercury moves during its Day Period (175.94 solar days) a distance = 720.7 mkm= Mercury Jupiter Distance
2- In Jupiter full revolution around the sun (360 degrees) the distance 720.7 mkm is seen 2 times along Jupiter orbital diameter – that means – a distance = 1441.4 mkm – and Mercury moves this distance in 2 Mercury Days (=351.9 solar days)
3- We know that – the solar system is one building each planet is a part of it – and the solar system moves as a train (all carriages move together) – similar to that all planets move together in one unified motion – the planets velocities difference doesn't disprove this idea because planets velocities are complementary to each to produce one unified general motion as any machine of gears
4- The solar system moves (All Planets Together) a distance = 1433.5 mkm = Saturn orbital distance Per A Solar Day
5- So Mercury Motion Distance during 2 Mercury Days = The Solar System motion distance in 1 Solar Day – that supports the claim "2 Mercury Days Are Used To Produce 1 Solar Day"(Please review Mercury Day Period (Short Discussion) (I &II) (The Links are In Paper References)
i.e.
6- Mercury moves during 2 Mercury days (=351.9 solar days) a distance =Saturn Orbital Distance =1433.5
7- We have agreed that – Uranus Orbital Distance is created as 2 days of the solar system motion – and we have suggested that – the solar system geometry building needs 2 days of the solar system motion – means – needs 2872.5 mkm = Uranus Orbital Distance – and to pass 2872.5 mkm Mercury has to move along 4 Mercury Days period (703.76 solar days)
8- Again in full revolution Uranus orbital distance is used 2 times along Uranus orbital diameter where the total distance = 2872.5 mkm x 2 = 5745 mkm – to pass this distance Mercury has to move a long 8 Mercury Days (1407.6 solar days)
9- Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours! What’s going on here?!!
Why does Earth Moon Orbit regress?
Why does Earth Moon Orbit regress?
Abstract
Earth Moon regresses yearly 19 degrees which means 1.44 degrees per month (Lunar nodes are moving west by about 19° per year)
Paper Hypotheses
1. Moon Orbit Regression proves that "Energy is Transported from Point to another through the solar system"
2. Moon Orbit Regression Energy is transported from Pluto to Uranus to Mercury to Earth Moon Orbit
3. Moon Orbit Regression is A Solar Group General Motion.
i.e.
- Solar Group is one building and each planet is a part of it. or Solar Group is one machine and each planet is a gear of it.
- Based on that – Solar Planet Motion is not individual or independent motion – on the contrary – all solar planets move together as a train moves with all its carriages
(although solar planets move by different velocities from each other – but they together consist one general motion)
The paper tries to prove these facts
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time) (II)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth
We still try to prove this same hypothesis we have suggested in the previous paper
Let's explain the proving process as simple as possible:
- I suppose there are 2 different rates of time in the solar system motion – Where (1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth) – how to prove this hypothesis??
- We have 2 method to do that:
- (1st Method) to use Lorentz Transformation by creating Time dilation which enable different rates of time to be produced – but at first we need to prove that there are relativistic effects in the solar system and to define the high velocity motion which causes these relativistic effects – and I have proved that, there are relativistic effects in the solar system in my previous papers
- (2nd Method) to use the solar system geometrical necessities – let's explain this idea as possible in following:
o If there are 2 rates of time in the solar system as I claim, and if the solar system is one machine or one building as I suppose that means this one building has 2 rates of time
o That will necessitate to create the planets data in proportionality with both rates of time otherwise the machine can't work
o This is similar to use 2 different size gears in one machine, to do that, we have to uses some other gears their dimensions be in proportionality with BOTH gears otherwise the machine will not work…
o This is the idea I try to use, suggesting that, if there are different rates of time in the solar system, that necessities the planets data to be created in Proportionality with Both Rates of time – and because of that we can conclude there both rates of time by these planets data analysis
o This paper tries to prove that, the planets data are created by their values because (1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth circumference
- The Energy is found alone before any Matter Creation
- A general Energy is found before the solar planets creation (I called this Energy "The Mother Energy")
- This mother Energy creates the solar planets matters (Mass) and orbital distances (Space)
- The Mother Energy forces the solar planet to move following her motion, So the planet follows the Energy Motion trajectory (with different rate of time)
That answers the question
- Why Earth circumference =40080 km?
Why Mercury Day Period = 4222.6 hours? (II)
-There's a light beam travels with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec
-The Solar System is a puppets theater – the planets move together one unified motion as a train carriage
-The solar system unified motion depends on a period = 8 Mercury Day Periods =1407.6 solar days
-The planets unified motion main cycle (1461 days) depends on the period 1407.6 days (=8 Mercury Day Periods)
-The solar system is a machine moves to create different rates of time - so a planet cycle uses the second period to create the minute period –another cycle uses the minutes to create the hour period, and another uses the hours to create the solar day …..etc
- For example Mercury 8 days period (1407.6 solar days) is used as its rotation period (1407.6 hours) –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Moon Orbital Motion Analysis
Moon Motion Details
- Earth Moon is The Solar Group Energy Indicator
- Earth Moon moves with 2 different motions – they together create the moon motion distance =2.58 mkm = Earth motion daily
- The Moon first Motion is (The Train Motion Concept) –
Let's explain it in following
- The Solar System is a theater of puppets – puppets move by outer force- which cause their motion
- The solar planets move together in one unified motion as a train moves with all its carriages (a planet = a carriage) (The Train Motion Concept)
- The Moon Second Motion is Masses Gravity Motion which causes the moon daily displacement (88000 km)
- The solar system geometrical mechanism uses the moon motion (88000 km) (Moon Displacement daily) to produce the distance (2 x 88000 km) – where this distance is required to make the moon motion daily =2.58 mkm = Earth Motion daily
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- This paper shows one more application using the previous rule … let's remember how we have concluded this rule in following
1. I have discussed light motion features in Planet motion
2. To explain these features of light motion, I had to provide the 1st hypothesis which tells (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
3. Then we needed to extent the discussion so I have added the 2nd hypothesis which tells (Light motion for 1 second causes Planet Motion for 1 solar day)
4. 2nd hypothesis tells us that, there are different rates of time in the solar system motion, so we have tried to discover these different rats of time through planets data analysis
5. then I have discovered this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) this rule tells us, Planets move equal distances to create different rates of time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth motion produces the moon orbit
Abstract
Earth Motion Energy produces the Moon Orbit based on The relativistic Motion
Example for Explanation:
In Lorentz Length contraction Equation
If
- Lo = Earth Daily Motion = 2.58 million
- v= 0.99 c (Earth hidden velocity- Hypothesis)
- L = 363000 km (the distance between Earth and moon at Perigee Point)
- Lo= 7.09 L
That means
Earth Energy Motion moves toward the moon and builds the moon orbit by this Energy
(that proves Earth has a hidden velocity =0.99c)
The Basic Concept
The Solar Group is consisted of one unified Energy, which passes and transports from point to another through the solar group
This unified Energy creates the solar planets matters, orbital distances and motions
Means the whole group is connected together by the same line of Energy, that's why we should consider the solar group as one body
So if the moon orbit is built by Earth motion energy (as we'll study in this paper)
That will be an example for the whole solar group,
the solar group can be similar to a river has many canals, each canal effects on the others
also
the solar group can be similar to group of gears, each gear effects on the others motions,
In Brief
I claim, The Solar groups is an integrated and cooperated system
The components of this system are created by an unified Energy, where this same unified Energy is transported from point to another through the solar group to cause the creation and motion of all these components and no solar component is found out of this Energy
(Solar components means the solar planets masses, orbital distances …and all other data)
Jupiter Effect On Pluto Motion
Paper Basic Question
Why do we analyze Jupiter Data and effect on different Planets?
Because
I try to prove that,
-The planets motions are light motions but we see them motions in planets motions form
-It's a light beam which causes the planets to move in front of us in the sky
-There's no gravity from the sun, there's no Big Bang theory – No more imaginations
-It's A Light Beam Motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth and Moon Motions Interaction (III)
Paper Questions
How to describe the Moon Motion Trajectory?
Let's review our conclusions in following:
- The research 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- The research 2nd one (light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 day)
- The 2nd hypothesis tells that there are different rates of time in the solar system,
- The basic rule tells (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
The Moon Orbital Motion Trajectory:
- Earth moves per solar day a distance =2.58 million km with an angle =0.985 deg on the horizontal line, the moon moves a very similar motion to Earth motion
- If there's no (Lorentz Length Contraction phenomenon) in the solar system, the moon motion would be as a parallel line to Earth motion trajectory … but
- Because of the contraction rate (1.0725) the moon motion distance daily (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be 2.41 mkm
- The difference (2.58 mkm -2.41 mkm) is a distance required necessary to be added to the moon motion distance to save the moon and Earth motions accompanying.
- 0.17 mkm is required to be passed daily
- The moon moves daily a displacement =88000 km depending on Earth Gravity
- But, Earth Mass = The 4 Inner Planets Masses Total (error 1%)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part IV)
Why Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods= 3 Mercury Rotation Periods?
We still discuss this question whose discussion is started in the previous paper
"Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 Saturn Orbital Distances"
Also we try to know If the previous relationship has any effect of Mercury Data
We complete the same discussion (in previous parts of the same series
The solar day production
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Matter Creation Principle (Part IV)
Let's remember our main argument in this papers series "Matter Creation Principle"
I have claimed the following:
(1) Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels for 1 second period only
(2) Light Motion for 1Second causes Planet to move for 1 solar day
(3) Based on Planet motion for 1 solar day – Solar Planets are created…
(4) Specifically – Pluto motion for 1 solar day is a result of light motion for 1 second period (light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec) and based on Pluto motion for 1 solar day – the planets diameters are created that's why Pluto Motion Distance Daily = 406000 km= Planets Diameters Total
But
(5) We have discovered that Earth Moon Orbit defines solar Planets diameters Where
a. Apogee Radius = Solar Planets Diameters Total
b. Perigee Radius = Outer Planets Diameters Total
c. Apogee–Perigee Distance =inner planets diameters total =Earth Circumference
(6) Based on the previous data we have concluded that (1st Conclusion) Pluto and Earth Moon together effect on Solar Planets Diameters Creation process (2nd Conclusion) light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec is sent from Pluto to Earth causes the Earth Axial Tilt (23.45degrees)
Also
(7) We have discovered that 2 Jupiter Diameters +1 Saturn Diameter = Solar Planets Diameters Total =406000 km
(8) i.e. Jupiter Diameter = 8 Planets Diameters Total
(9) These relationships are depended also on light beam velocity 1.16 mkm /sec
What we need to do in this paper?
The previous claim is a heavy one, so we need to discuss (1st) More Proves & Details (2nd) How does this machine work?
Let's start immediately…
Please Note
Paper Methodology is mentioned in "Matter Creation Principle (Part III)"
Metonic cycle proves,, solar planets motions depend on their cooperation,, (1)
I provide a new vision for the solar group
The solar planets existence and motions depend on their cooperation with each other
This vision in fact contradicts the solar group current vision…
For example, the current vision refuses to have any relationship between Earth and Pluto because of the great distance between them, where the gravity force depends on the masses and decreases with the squared distance…
My vision, on contrary, uses the Energy as source for Matter and Distance, means, the matter is created from Energy as the Equation E=mc2 tells us, and the distance is created from Energy which is my hypothesis…
That means, the solar group is created from one energy
Let's imagine that the solar group is similar to a creature body, now the same blood in this body goes to all members and connect all these members by this same blood
So, Earth is connected with Pluto by the same energy which creates the matter and distance
The main advantage in my vision or about the solar group is The Cooperation Between The Solar Planets…
Metonic Cycle which is a cycle of Earth Moon extends for 19 sidereal years = 6939.75 days provides us a good proof for my claim
So, we shall see in this paper, how Metonic Cycle can be seen as energy transports from point to another point through the solar which proves and supports my point of view.
In fact that adds more extension for our thinking about the solar group and provides a great background for Metonic Cycle which is done by the Moon without explanation, where Earth doesn't rotate this cycle which answers our old question, if the planet moves by gravity and the moon under the Earth gravity, how does the moon rotate the Metonic Cycle which the Earth (his parent) doesn't?
Actually my vision provides new knowledge for the solar group where we'll use the cooperation between the solar planets as a real factor to perform their existence and motions
Note Please/
Metonic Cycle period = 6939.75 days
= 19 x 365.25 days (19 sidereal years)
= 235 x 29.53 days (235 Synodic Months)
= 20 x 346.6 days (20 nodal years)
The previous data tell that, there's a harmony between Earth, Moon and Moon orbit motions? why? We try to answer this question in this paper…
The Moon Motion Basic Equation
- I have discovered The Earth Moon Basic Equation
- I call it (Gerges equation for the moon orbital motion)
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
The Equation Concept
- I claim, the moon original motion is an identical to The Earth one, i.e. the moon moves daily a distance 2.58 mkm with an angle 0.985 deg. on the horizontal line.
- The moon motion daily rest angle (13.18 deg -0.985 deg= 12.195deg), it's created by of the moon daily displacement (88000 km)
- The moon daily motion depends on the angle (0.985 deg) as Earth motion, each day Earth adds (0.985 deg) to its revolution around the sun (till 360 degrees)
- But, Why the moon uses (The angle θ) in its motion? because
- The moon daily displacement (88000km) isn't used as a real displacement through the moon orbit, instead, the moon uses this value (88000 km) to create another real displacement suitable with the moon orbit radius… because of that, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its motion. the moon displacement (88000km) will be used as the right triangle hypotenuse, where the real displacement is (L =88000 cos θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Moon Orbital Motion Analysis (II)
The Moon orbital Motion Direction is defined based on the following factors:
1- Masses Gravity forces definition for the moon motion direction is correct.
But
2- The moon principle motion is done similar to Earth motion – i.e. a motion on straight line inclining with 0.985 degrees per solar day
3- Because Earth motion =2.58 mkm and moon motion becomes 2.41 mkm –this difference in velocities causes the motion in straight line to be seen in parabola
So – points 2 & 3 should be taken into consideration before using Masses gravity to define the moon orbital motion direction
4- Venus effect on the moon orbit causes its regression 19 degrees yearly and that effect on the moon orbital motion
5- Saturn and Uranus interaction effects on the moon orbital motion and defined the moon motion main points
That means
There are 5 factors effect on the moon orbital motion direction
Is There A Parallel Universe
Paper Hypothesis
The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
We see the planet moves and thinks that the planet moves by the masses gravity forces – but in fact there's a light beam moves behind the planet and this light motion causes the planet motion-
Think about the Water wheel deeply and carefully –The water wheel is formed in a circle form has edges – and the water wheel is fixed by axis provides the chance for the water wheel to rotate around its axis
Now
The water moves on the ground in one direction pushing the water wheel edges and caused the water wheel to be rotated around its axis –
Here we have 2 motions
The water motion and the water wheel motion – both are in different directions – one motion is continuous and directed in one direction (the water) and the other motion is rotation motion around axis (the water wheel)
The water motion expresses the light motion and the water wheel motion expresses The Planet Motion –
So We Have 2 Parallel Motions - That's Why We Have 2 Parallel Universes
But we realize that these 2 motions depend on the water motion (the light motion) – that because the light motion is the distance creator and energy provider – where the planet motion is a result of the light motion
The paper tries to prove this fact.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)
Abstract
Mercury Day = 4222.6 hours, Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours and Mercury orbital period = 88 days
I claim the following:
- These three cycles are related to each other
- These three cycles depend on Jupiter Uranus distance (2095 mkm)
- Please remember that, Earth moon Metonic Cycle also depends on Jupiter Uranus distance which makes these 4 cycles are related to each other
By proving the previous claim I try to support my basic claim in all my papers that:
The Solar Group is one machine or one body, each planet should be considered as a gear in this machine or as a member in this body.
i.e.
No Planet Motion is Found Independent From Other Planets Motions
The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis
Paper hypothesis
There's Another Force Effects On The Moon Motion Trajectory
(This Force Is = Earth Gravity Force, and effect on the trajectory other side)
- I have discovered this force by analysis the Earth moon motion data,
- This Force Is Originated By The 4 Inner Planets Masses Total, (because the 4 inner planets masses total = Earth mass "with difference only 1%")
- And… because the planets are on far distances from the moon, I have concluded that, there's an electric field controls the inner planets and enable the 4 inner planets masses to practice its gravity on the moon motion trajectory
- This electric field depends on the planets different charges, where this electric field hypothesis is discussed in the previous paper…
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses the proves of this second force existence and effect on the moon motion trajectory, and analyzes this force point effect and its different properties.
- The paper also analyzes the moon motion trajectory, trying to discover it.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
What's hot (20)
Why Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods = 3 Mercury Rotation Perio...
Why Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods = 3 Mercury Rotation Perio...
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time) (II)
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time) (II)
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
Metonic cycle proves,, solar planets motions depend on their cooperation,, (1)
Metonic cycle proves,, solar planets motions depend on their cooperation,, (1)
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)
Viewers also liked
Nature Of Time
This is a novel approach on unifying the current divergent theories on how the whole universe is built.
The Relevance and Irrelevance of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle for the Q...
Quantum mechanics is not something you would have guessed. The moment you juxtapose quantum mechanics and everyday experience, the mysteries of how the former relates to, much less explains, the latter seem to have no end. Scientists are predisposed to take the obviousness of the world for granted (rightfully so) while trying to explain and justify quantum mechanics. Many philosophers also take the obviousness of the world for granted (improperly so). But there are a few philosophers who have taken note that the very obviousness of the world is rather surprising. It’s surprising because that which is so obvious is at the same time so unobtrusive; it is so obvious it practically insists that we overlook it. Why does the world already make sense to us, at least in an unreflective way, the moment we turn our attention to it, before we’ve had a chance to formulate the first question about it? The child contends with and utilizes gravity long before its unceasing effects arouse curiosity. Upon a moment’s reflection, we can see that our first tentative intellectual steps toward understanding, like learning our first musical tune, are already upheld by a robust commitment to the consistency and congruity of sensuous experience. We enter the world with a basic commitment to the world, what Merleau-Ponty called “perceptual faith.”
Ethical Considerations in the Design of Artificial Intelligence
A presentation for IEEE's Ethics Symposium happening in Vancouver, May 2016. Featuring presentations from John C. Havens, Mike Van der Loos, John P. Sullins, and Alan Mackworth.
Why the "hard" problem of consciousness is easy and the "easy" problem hard....
The "hard" problem of concsiousness can be shown to be a non-problem because it is formulated using a seriously defective concept (the concept of "phenomenal consciousness" defined so as to rule out cognitive functionality and causal powers).
So the hard problem is an example of a well known type of philosophical problem that needs to be dissolved (fairly easily) rather than solved. For other examples, and a brief introduction to conceptual analysis, see http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/varieties-of-atheism.html
In contrast, the so-called "easy" problem requires detailed analysis of very complex and subtle features of perceptual processes, introspective processes and other mental processes, sometimes labelled "access consciousness": these have cognitive functions, but their complexity (especially the way details change as the environment changes or the perceiver moves) is considerable and very hard to characterise.
"Access consciousness" is complex also because it takes many different forms, since what individuals are conscious of and what uses being conscious of things can be put to, can vary hugely, from simple life forms, through many other animals and human infants, to sophisticated adult humans,
Finding ways of modelling these aspects of consciousness, and explaining how they arise out of physical mechanisms, requires major advances in the science of information processing systems -- including computer science and neuroscience.
There are empirical facts about introspection that have generated theories of consciousness but some of the empirical facts go unnoticed by philosophers.
The notion of a virtual machine is introduced briefly and illustrated using Conway's "Game of life" and other examples of virtual machinery that explain how contents of consciousness can have causal powers and can have intentionality (be able to refer to other things).
The beginnings of a research program are presented, showing how more examples can be collected and how notions of virtual machinery may need to be developed to cope with all the phenomena.
Einstein M Theory , String Theory and The Future
The unification of fundamental forces of nature into a single force occupied Einstein attention for much of his later life. Today thousand of physicist, on the cutting edge of physics is still trying to solve it. Albert Einstein spent his last two decades and during his last hr. he was trying to unify all the theories and laws of universe into a single theory so powerful that can describe all the laws and theories of the universe but Einstein ran out of time unfulfilling his dream, now almost a half century later his dream has become the holy grail of the modern physics we may achieve Einstein dream with a new and radical set of ideas called string theory but if this revolutionary theory is right we are in real quite a shock, String Theory says we may be living in a world where reality meets science fiction, a universe of eleven dimension with parallel universes right next to us i.e.an elegant universe composed entirely of the music of strings, but what would be if we combine Einstein general theory of relatively,Newtonian Mechanics Maxwellian Electromagnetism and quantum mechanics to produce a theory that can explain the cosmic background radiation then it would be really a blockbuster in the history of science.
. I have seen that the weak force has ben successfully combined with electromagnetism so that they may be jointly viewed as aspects of a single electroweak force . theories that attempts to add the strong force to this combination-called grand unification theories (GUT) – are being persuade actively . This could be a theory that would seeks to complete the job by adding gravity – sometimes called theories of everything (TOE) .
Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness (Empiricist League Presentation)
Consciousness and AI
John C. Havens is a contributing writer for Mashable, The Guardian, and Slate. He is the author of Hacking H(app)iness – Why Your Personal Data Counts and How Tracking it Can Change the World and has recently published his second title for Tarcher/Penguin, Heartificial Intelligence: Embracing Our Humanity to Maximize Machines. He will be speaking to the Empiricist League about what AI can teach us about consciousness, as well as the ramifications for conscious machines on our world.
Artificial Intelligence
This Presentation will give you an overview about Artificial Intelligence : definition, advantages , disadvantages , benefits , applications .
We hope it to be useful .
Viewers also liked (13)
The Relevance and Irrelevance of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle for the Q...
The Relevance and Irrelevance of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle for the Q...
Ethical Considerations in the Design of Artificial Intelligence
Ethical Considerations in the Design of Artificial Intelligence
Why the "hard" problem of consciousness is easy and the "easy" problem hard....
Why the "hard" problem of consciousness is easy and the "easy" problem hard....
Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness (Empiricist League Presentation)
Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness (Empiricist League Presentation)
Similar to Science of Time and the Theory of Everything
Graha-Nakshtra-Raasi and Indian Time Calculation
Graha-Nakshtra-Raasi and Indian Time Calculation have been give in brief details to indicate how scientific our system of horoscope and astronomy had developed even world was unaware of it.
Mathematical Universe: Our Search for the Ultimate Nature of Reality
We become more aware of how little we know about how the cosmos functions as we learn more about it. The Universe is full of secrets, from the doorstep of our own Solar System to the far-off shores of the intergalactic ocean. With the help of a large number of telescopes and satellites, we have increased our understanding of the universe. We have been investigating the history of the cosmos, from the Big Bang through comets' peculiarities and our curiosity about the chemistry of stars. One thing unites many of the most prevalent theories: they start from a mathematical framework that aims to explain more than our existing leading theories can. We Humans, inquisitive creatures shaped by Darwin's theory of natural selection, are used to asking questions. The question is not 'do we know everything from the very nature of physical laws to the underlying discomfort of the ultimate question of our place in the Universe?' or it is 'do we know enough?' But how does the creative principle reside in mathematics? There's something very mathematical about our gigantic Cosmos, and that the more carefully we look, the more equations are built into nature: From basic arithmetic to the calculation of rocket trajectories, math provides a good understanding of the equations that govern the world around us. Our universe isn't just described by math, but that universe is a "grand book" written in the language of mathematics. We find it very appropriate that mathematics has played a striking role in our expanding understanding of the universe − its origin, composition and destiny.
Advanced Astronomy in Bhagavata Purana
Starting from the interpretation of Bhu-mandala (the level of material universe including Earth as mentioned in Puranic tradition) as a description of the solar system, already present in the literature, further effort is devoted in finding additional correlations with current astronomical knowledge, with regard to the following points: (i) the length of the solar chariot axle; (ii) the height of the solar chariot axle on Bhu-mandala plane; (iii) the relevance of 108 in Puranic tradition. The width of Bhu-mandala regions, represented as a circle surrounded by a series of concentric circular coronae, is expressed via simple formulae which, for inner zones, are variants of the empirical Titius-Bode law. Further connection with the solar system, in addition to current results, is found with regard to bounding circumferences between contiguous regions. The location of the solar globe on the solar chariot axle is related to apogee locus of Sun geocentric orbit, instead of mean Earth-Sun distance. The height of the solar globe on Bhu-mandala plane is related to solar diameter. Assuming planet orbital parameters underwent only statistical fluctuations via gravitational interactions and collisions from large asteroids, and taking into consideration solar diameter growth due to stellar evolution, a past epoch is inferred where the ratio of mean (or aphelion) Earth-Sun distance to solar diameter was 108. Finally, an inspection of solar evolution, regardless of Puranic tradition, discloses a new era is coming into the world.
WE theory
The word WE stands for two meanings i.e. Wave-Energy and West-East. This is the theory of astronomy and astrology. This theory connects science with dharma, spirituality with matters. It believes that the ultimate truth of this universe is "WAVE" The god is omnipresent as electron (Maheshwor), proton (Bishnu), and Neutron (Bramha).
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (VI)
Paper hypothesis:
- 2 New Cycles are discovered which are:
o A Cycle of 8 of Pluto Days Period (1226.4 hours)
o A Cycle of 8 of Jupiter Days Period (79.2 hours)
o Jupiter Day Cycle depends on Pluto Day Cycle
Paper Argument:
- The new discovered cycles proves the following arguments
o The motion energy is transported from Uranus to Jupiter then to Saturn (Or from Neptune to Uranus to Jupiter and then to Saturn)
o Planet Circumference is a player effects on the produced cycles by this planet motion.
o Planets Motions are a network created based on interactions between these planets motions – Planets data is created based on this network motions interactions.
o Saturn data is effected by Uranus and Neptune Motions Interaction.
The Earth moon is a planet found inside basic motions interactions and because of that, Its data is effected by almost (all) planets motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development
Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering,
Information Engineering and Technology,
Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,
Automation and Mechatronics Engineering,
Material and Chemical Engineering,
Civil and Architecture Engineering,
Biotechnology and Bio Engineering,
Environmental Engineering,
Petroleum and Mining Engineering,
Marine and Agriculture engineering,
Aerospace Engineering.
Eastern cosmology by sunil laudari
an outlook to the early history and development in cosmology/Astronomy in Vedic era and its influence to the present age
Verifying the Origin of Everything with Binary Mathematical Physics and Buddhism
It’s about a new type of mathematical discovery about the origin/existence of the universe. I have used modern scientific discoveries (E.g., quantum mechanics) and explanations about fundamental elements (quantum physics) in Buddhism to verify it. I researched about zero (0) to find the universe's origin. If zero is fundamental, then the continuation of zero (0) in infinity (∞) can emerge as dimensions between continued directions making relative dimensions. Meanwhile, it could continue as interactions of dimensions, making an emergence like the first universe. It’s about verifying the root of everything using a theory about everything (particles, forces) while making predictions better than String Theory and M-Theory. It’s a sort of equation that uses binary moments (momentum!) of dimensions. It helped me find a few mathematical interactions like elementary particles, quantum foam, forces, etc. I have tried to explain the fundamental nature of the Planck constant, wave functions, symmetry breaking, Black Holes, Dark Matter, force moments, quantum gravity, and many more using that calculation. That shows that the universe is solving mathematical equations. Let’s find out how the universe(s) made elementary particles, dimensional structures, and interactions.
Lake of lotus (7) the essence of teachings-emptiness-neither existence nor vo...
Lake of lotus (7) the essence of teachings-emptiness-neither existence nor vo...DudjomBuddhistAssociation
Lake of lotus (7) the essence of teachings-emptiness-neither existence nor voidness (2) view of the cosmology：the structure of the universe-by vajra master yeshe thaye-dudjom buddhist associationBook pyrami tronix resonator_r
The book on how to accelerate the law of attraction using a pyramid mind machine and a radionics template
In The Beginning
Big Bang, Cosmology, Astronomy, Time, Starlight, Redshifts, Inflation vs. The Bible Creation Story.
Equation of a particle in gravitational field of spherical body
International journals call for papers, http://www.iiste.org/
The solar system geometry (part ii) (revised)
Abstract
The Solar Planets Group is One Machine
This one machine cooperates together to enable the Earth to produce The Solar Day Time
Providing the life chance on the Earth..
This paper aims to prove this idea and explains this machine mechanism.
Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets (IV)
1.There's a velocity =1.16 mkm /sec
2.Jupiter proves that "The Solar System Is One Machine"
3.The solar system is one machine of gears and each planet is a gear in this same machine.
4.Jupiter & the three inner planets are created depending on each other
5.Mars is created depending on Jupiter & Saturn cooperation
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vedic Science and Hinduism | Speed of Light in Hinduism | Many more applicati...
Vedic Science and Hinduism | Speed of Light in Hinduism | Many more applicati...Chitwan Medical College
Speed of light calculated according to Hindu scriptures. Similar to Science of Time and the Theory of Everything (20)
Mathematical Universe: Our Search for the Ultimate Nature of Reality
Mathematical Universe: Our Search for the Ultimate Nature of Reality
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development
Verifying the Origin of Everything with Binary Mathematical Physics and Buddhism
Verifying the Origin of Everything with Binary Mathematical Physics and Buddhism
Lake of lotus (7) the essence of teachings-emptiness-neither existence nor vo...
Lake of lotus (7) the essence of teachings-emptiness-neither existence nor vo...
The gravitational potential of a diatomic system 2-3
The gravitational potential of a diatomic system 2-3
Equation of a particle in gravitational field of spherical body
Equation of a particle in gravitational field of spherical body
Vedic Science and Hinduism | Speed of Light in Hinduism | Many more applicati...
Vedic Science and Hinduism | Speed of Light in Hinduism | Many more applicati...
Falsification of Einstein's Theory of "Special Relativity"
Falsification of Einstein's Theory of "Special Relativity"
More from IJERD Editor
A Novel Method for Prevention of Bandwidth Distributed Denial of Service Attacks
Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks became a massive threat to the Internet. Traditional
Architecture of internet is vulnerable to the attacks like DDoS. Attacker primarily acquire his army of Zombies,
then that army will be instructed by the Attacker that when to start an attack and on whom the attack should be
done. In this paper, different techniques which are used to perform DDoS Attacks, Tools that were used to
perform Attacks and Countermeasures in order to detect the attackers and eliminate the Bandwidth Distributed
Denial of Service attacks (B-DDoS) are reviewed. DDoS Attacks were done by using various Flooding
techniques which are used in DDoS attack.
The main purpose of this paper is to design an architecture which can reduce the Bandwidth
Distributed Denial of service Attack and make the victim site or server available for the normal users by
eliminating the zombie machines. Our Primary focus of this paper is to dispute how normal machines are
turning into zombies (Bots), how attack is been initiated, DDoS attack procedure and how an organization can
save their server from being a DDoS victim. In order to present this we implemented a simulated environment
with Cisco switches, Routers, Firewall, some virtual machines and some Attack tools to display a real DDoS
attack. By using Time scheduling, Resource Limiting, System log, Access Control List and some Modular
policy Framework we stopped the attack and identified the Attacker (Bot) machines
MEMS MICROPHONE INTERFACE
Hearing loss is one of the most common human impairments. It is estimated that by year 2015 more
than 700 million people will suffer mild deafness. Most can be helped by hearing aid devices depending on the
severity of their hearing loss. This paper describes the implementation and characterization details of a dual
channel transmitter front end (TFE) for digital hearing aid (DHA) applications that use novel micro
electromechanical- systems (MEMS) audio transducers and ultra-low power-scalable analog-to-digital
converters (ADCs), which enable a very-low form factor, energy-efficient implementation for next-generation
DHA. The contribution of the design is the implementation of the dual channel MEMS microphones and powerscalable
ADC system.
Influence of tensile behaviour of slab on the structural Behaviour of shear c...
-A composite beam is composed of a steel beam and a slab connected by means of shear connectors
like studs installed on the top flange of the steel beam to form a structure behaving monolithically. This study
analyzes the effects of the tensile behavior of the slab on the structural behavior of the shear connection like slip
stiffness and maximum shear force in composite beams subjected to hogging moment. The results show that the
shear studs located in the crack-concentration zones due to large hogging moments sustain significantly smaller
shear force and slip stiffness than the other zones. Moreover, the reduction of the slip stiffness in the shear
connection appears also to be closely related to the change in the tensile strain of rebar according to the increase
of the load. Further experimental and analytical studies shall be conducted considering variables such as the
reinforcement ratio and the arrangement of shear connectors to achieve efficient design of the shear connection
in composite beams subjected to hogging moment.
Gold prospecting using Remote Sensing ‘A case study of Sudan’
Gold has been extracted from northeast Africa for more than 5000 years, and this may be the first
place where the metal was extracted. The Arabian-Nubian Shield (ANS) is an exposure of Precambrian
crystalline rocks on the flanks of the Red Sea. The crystalline rocks are mostly Neoproterozoic in age. ANS
includes the nations of Israel, Jordan. Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Yemen, and Somalia.
Arabian Nubian Shield Consists of juvenile continental crest that formed between 900 550 Ma, when intra
oceanic arc welded together along ophiolite decorated arc. Primary Au mineralization probably developed in
association with the growth of intra oceanic arc and evolution of back arc. Multiple episodes of deformation
have obscured the primary metallogenic setting, but at least some of the deposits preserve evidence that they
originate as sea floor massive sulphide deposits.
The Red Sea Hills Region is a vast span of rugged, harsh and inhospitable sector of the Earth with
inimical moon-like terrain, nevertheless since ancient times it is famed to be an abode of gold and was a major
source of wealth for the Pharaohs of ancient Egypt. The Pharaohs old workings have been periodically
rediscovered through time. Recent endeavours by the Geological Research Authority of Sudan led to the
discovery of a score of occurrences with gold and massive sulphide mineralizations. In the nineties of the
previous century the Geological Research Authority of Sudan (GRAS) in cooperation with BRGM utilized
satellite data of Landsat TM using spectral ratio technique to map possible mineralized zones in the Red Sea
Hills of Sudan. The outcome of the study mapped a gossan type gold mineralization. Band ratio technique was
applied to Arbaat area and a signature of alteration zone was detected. The alteration zones are commonly
associated with mineralization. The alteration zones are commonly associated with mineralization. A filed check
confirmed the existence of stock work of gold bearing quartz in the alteration zone. Another type of gold
mineralization that was discovered using remote sensing is the gold associated with metachert in the Atmur
Desert.
Reducing Corrosion Rate by Welding Design
The paper addresses the importance of welding design to prevent corrosion at steel. Welding is
used to join pipe, profiles at bridges, spindle, and a lot more part of engineering construction. The
problems happened associated with welding are common issues in these fields, especially corrosion.
Corrosion can be reduced with many methods, they are painting, controlling humidity, and also good
welding design. In the research, it can be found that reducing residual stress on the welding can be
solved in corrosion rate reduction problem.
Preheating on 500oC and 600oC give better condition to reduce corosion rate than condition after
preheating 400oC. For all welding groove type, material with 500oC and 600oC preheating after 14 days
corrosion test is 0,5%-0,69% lost. Material with 400oC preheating after 14 days corrosion test is 0,57%-0,76%
lost.
Welding groove also influence corrosion rate. X and V type welding groove give better condition to reduce
corrosion rate than use 1/2V and 1/2 X welding groove. After 14 days corrosion test, the samples with
X welding groove type is 0,5%-0,57% lost. The samples with V welding groove after 14 days corrosion test is
0,51%-0,59% lost. The samples with 1/2V and 1/2X welding groove after 14 days corrosion test is 0,58%-
0,71% lost.
Router 1X3 – RTL Design and Verification
Routing is the process of moving a packet of data from source to destination and enables messages
to pass from one computer to another and eventually reach the target machine. A router is a networking device
that forwards data packets between computer networks. It is connected to two or more data lines from different
networks (as opposed to a network switch, which connects data lines from one single network). This paper,
mainly emphasizes upon the study of router device, it‟s top level architecture, and how various sub-modules of
router i.e. Register, FIFO, FSM and Synchronizer are synthesized, and simulated and finally connected to its top
module.
Active Power Exchange in Distributed Power-Flow Controller (DPFC) At Third Ha...
This paper presents a component within the flexible ac-transmission system (FACTS) family, called
distributed power-flow controller (DPFC). The DPFC is derived from the unified power-flow controller (UPFC)
with an eliminated common dc link. The DPFC has the same control capabilities as the UPFC, which comprise
the adjustment of the line impedance, the transmission angle, and the bus voltage. The active power exchange
between the shunt and series converters, which is through the common dc link in the UPFC, is now through the
transmission lines at the third-harmonic frequency. DPFC multiple small-size single-phase converters which
reduces the cost of equipment, no voltage isolation between phases, increases redundancy and there by
reliability increases. The principle and analysis of the DPFC are presented in this paper and the corresponding
simulation results that are carried out on a scaled prototype are also shown.
Mitigation of Voltage Sag/Swell with Fuzzy Control Reduced Rating DVR
Power quality has been an issue that is becoming increasingly pivotal in industrial electricity
consumers point of view in recent times. Modern industries employ Sensitive power electronic equipments,
control devices and non-linear loads as part of automated processes to increase energy efficiency and
productivity. Voltage disturbances are the most common power quality problem due to this the use of a large
numbers of sophisticated and sensitive electronic equipment in industrial systems is increased. This paper
discusses the design and simulation of dynamic voltage restorer for improvement of power quality and
reduce the harmonics distortion of sensitive loads. Power quality problem is occurring at non-standard
voltage, current and frequency. Electronic devices are very sensitive loads. In power system voltage sag,
swell, flicker and harmonics are some of the problem to the sensitive load. The compensation capability
of a DVR depends primarily on the maximum voltage injection ability and the amount of stored
energy available within the restorer. This device is connected in series with the distribution feeder at
medium voltage. A fuzzy logic control is used to produce the gate pulses for control circuit of DVR and the
circuit is simulated by using MATLAB/SIMULINK software.
Study on the Fused Deposition Modelling In Additive Manufacturing
Additive manufacturing process, also popularly known as 3-D printing, is a process where a product
is created in a succession of layers. It is based on a novel materials incremental manufacturing philosophy.
Unlike conventional manufacturing processes where material is removed from a given work price to derive the
final shape of a product, 3-D printing develops the product from scratch thus obviating the necessity to cut away
materials. This prevents wastage of raw materials. Commonly used raw materials for the process are ABS
plastic, PLA and nylon. Recently the use of gold, bronze and wood has also been implemented. The complexity
factor of this process is 0% as in any object of any shape and size can be manufactured.
Spyware triggering system by particular string value
This computer programme can be used for good and bad purpose in hacking or in any general
purpose. We can say it is next step for hacking techniques such as keylogger and spyware. Once in this system if
user or hacker store particular string as a input after that software continually compare typing activity of user
with that stored string and if it is match then launch spyware programme.
A Blind Steganalysis on JPEG Gray Level Image Based on Statistical Features a...
This paper presents a blind steganalysis technique to effectively attack the JPEG steganographic
schemes i.e. Jsteg, F5, Outguess and DWT Based. The proposed method exploits the correlations between
block-DCTcoefficients from intra-block and inter-block relation and the statistical moments of characteristic
functions of the test image is selected as features. The features are extracted from the BDCT JPEG 2-array.
Support Vector Machine with cross-validation is implemented for the classification.The proposed scheme gives
improved outcome in attacking.
Secure Image Transmission for Cloud Storage System Using Hybrid Scheme
- Data over the cloud is transferred or transmitted between servers and users. Privacy of that
data is very important as it belongs to personal information. If data get hacked by the hacker, can be
used to defame a person’s social data. Sometimes delay are held during data transmission. i.e. Mobile
communication, bandwidth is low. Hence compression algorithms are proposed for fast and efficient
transmission, encryption is used for security purposes and blurring is used by providing additional
layers of security. These algorithms are hybridized for having a robust and efficient security and
transmission over cloud storage system.
Application of Buckley-Leverett Equation in Modeling the Radius of Invasion i...
A thorough review of existing literature indicates that the Buckley-Leverett equation only analyzes
waterflood practices directly without any adjustments on real reservoir scenarios. By doing so, quite a number
of errors are introduced into these analyses. Also, for most waterflood scenarios, a radial investigation is more
appropriate than a simplified linear system. This study investigates the adoption of the Buckley-Leverett
equation to estimate the radius invasion of the displacing fluid during waterflooding. The model is also adopted
for a Microbial flood and a comparative analysis is conducted for both waterflooding and microbial flooding.
Results shown from the analysis doesn’t only records a success in determining the radial distance of the leading
edge of water during the flooding process, but also gives a clearer understanding of the applicability of
microbes to enhance oil production through in-situ production of bio-products like bio surfactans, biogenic
gases, bio acids etc.
Gesture Gaming on the World Wide Web Using an Ordinary Web Camera
- Gesture gaming is a method by which users having a laptop/pc/x-box play games using natural or
bodily gestures. This paper presents a way of playing free flash games on the internet using an ordinary webcam
with the help of open source technologies. Emphasis in human activity recognition is given on the pose
estimation and the consistency in the pose of the player. These are estimated with the help of an ordinary web
camera having different resolutions from VGA to 20mps. Our work involved giving a 10 second documentary to
the user on how to play a particular game using gestures and what are the various kinds of gestures that can be
performed in front of the system. The initial inputs of the RGB values for the gesture component is obtained by
instructing the user to place his component in a red box in about 10 seconds after the short documentary before
the game is finished. Later the system opens the concerned game on the internet on popular flash game sites like
miniclip, games arcade, GameStop etc and loads the game clicking at various places and brings the state to a
place where the user is to perform only gestures to start playing the game. At any point of time the user can call
off the game by hitting the esc key and the program will release all of the controls and return to the desktop. It
was noted that the results obtained using an ordinary webcam matched that of the Kinect and the users could
relive the gaming experience of the free flash games on the net. Therefore effective in game advertising could
also be achieved thus resulting in a disruptive growth to the advertising firms.
Hardware Analysis of Resonant Frequency Converter Using Isolated Circuits And...
-LLC resonant frequency converter is basically a combo of series as well as parallel resonant ckt. For
LCC resonant converter it is associated with a disadvantage that, though it has two resonant frequencies, the
lower resonant frequency is in ZCS region[5]. For this application, we are not able to design the converter
working at this resonant frequency. LLC resonant converter existed for a very long time but because of
unknown characteristic of this converter it was used as a series resonant converter with basically a passive
(resistive) load. . Here, it was designed to operate in switching frequency higher than resonant frequency of the
series resonant tank of Lr and Cr converter acts very similar to Series Resonant Converter. The benefit of LLC
resonant converter is narrow switching frequency range with light load[6] . Basically, the control ckt plays a
very imp. role and hence 555 Timer used here provides a perfect square wave as the control ckt provides no
slew rate which makes the square wave really strong and impenetrable. The dead band circuit provides the
exclusive dead band in micro seconds so as to avoid the simultaneous firing of two pairs of IGBT’s where one
pair switches off and the other on for a slightest period of time. Hence, the isolator ckt here is associated with
each and every ckt used because it acts as a driver and an isolation to each of the IGBT is provided with one
exclusive transformer supply[3]. The IGBT’s are fired using the appropriate signal using the previous boards
and hence at last a high frequency rectifier ckt with a filtering capacitor is used to get an exact dc
waveform .The basic goal of this particular analysis is to observe the wave forms and characteristics of
converters with differently positioned passive elements in the form of tank circuits.
Simulated Analysis of Resonant Frequency Converter Using Different Tank Circu...
LLC resonant frequency converter is basically a combo of series as well as parallel resonant ckt. For
LCC resonant converter it is associated with a disadvantage that, though it has two resonant frequencies, the
lower resonant frequency is in ZCS region [5]. For this application, we are not able to design the converter
working at this resonant frequency. LLC resonant converter existed for a very long time but because of
unknown characteristic of this converter it was used as a series resonant converter with basically a passive
(resistive) load. . Here, it was designed to operate in switching frequency higher than resonant frequency of the
series resonant tank of Lr and Cr converter acts very similar to Series Resonant Converter. The benefit of LLC
resonant converter is narrow switching frequency range with light load[6] . Basically, the control ckt plays a
very imp. role and hence 555 Timer used here provides a perfect square wave as the control ckt provides no
slew rate which makes the square wave really strong and impenetrable. The dead band circuit provides the
exclusive dead band in micro seconds so as to avoid the simultaneous firing of two pairs of IGBT’s where one
pair switches off and the other on for a slightest period of time. Hence, the isolator ckt here is associated with
each and every ckt used because it acts as a driver and an isolation to each of the IGBT is provided with one
exclusive transformer supply[3]. The IGBT’s are fired using the appropriate signal using the previous boards
and hence at last a high frequency rectifier ckt with a filtering capacitor is used to get an exact dc
waveform .The basic goal of this particular analysis is to observe the wave forms and characteristics of
converters with differently positioned passive elements in the form of tank circuits. The supported simulation
is done through PSIM 6.0 software tool
Moon-bounce: A Boon for VHF Dxing
Amateurs Radio operator, also known as HAM communicates with other HAMs through Radio
waves. Wireless communication in which Moon is used as natural satellite is called Moon-bounce or EME
(Earth -Moon-Earth) technique. Long distance communication (DXing) using Very High Frequency (VHF)
operated amateur HAM radio was difficult. Even with the modest setup having good transceiver, power
amplifier and high gain antenna with high directivity, VHF DXing is possible. Generally 2X11 YAGI antenna
along with rotor to set horizontal and vertical angle is used. Moon tracking software gives exact location,
visibility of Moon at both the stations and other vital data to acquire real time position of moon.
“MS-Extractor: An Innovative Approach to Extract Microsatellites on „Y‟ Chrom...
Simple Sequence Repeats (SSR), also known as Microsatellites, have been extensively used as
molecular markers due to their abundance and high degree of polymorphism. The nucleotide sequences of
polymorphic forms of the same gene should be 99.9% identical. So, Microsatellites extraction from the Gene is
crucial. However, Microsatellites repeat count is compared, if they differ largely, he has some disorder. The Y
chromosome likely contains 50 to 60 genes that provide instructions for making proteins. Because only males
have the Y chromosome, the genes on this chromosome tend to be involved in male sex determination and
development. Several Microsatellite Extractors exist and they fail to extract microsatellites on large data sets of
giga bytes and tera bytes in size. The proposed tool “MS-Extractor: An Innovative Approach to extract
Microsatellites on „Y‟ Chromosome” can extract both Perfect as well as Imperfect Microsatellites from large
data sets of human genome „Y‟. The proposed system uses string matching with sliding window approach to
locate Microsatellites and extracts them.
Importance of Measurements in Smart Grid
- The need to get reliable supply, independence from fossil fuels, and capability to provide clean
energy at a fixed and lower cost, the existing power grid structure is transforming into Smart Grid. The
development of a smart energy distribution grid is a current goal of many nations. A Smart Grid should have
new capabilities such as self-healing, high reliability, energy management, and real-time pricing. This new era
of smart future grid will lead to major changes in existing technologies at generation, transmission and
distribution levels. The incorporation of renewable energy resources and distribution generators in the existing
grid will increase the complexity, optimization problems and instability of the system. This will lead to a
paradigm shift in the instrumentation and control requirements for Smart Grids for high quality, stable and
reliable electricity supply of power. The monitoring of the grid system state and stability relies on the
availability of reliable measurement of data. In this paper the measurement areas that highlight new
measurement challenges, development of the Smart Meters and the critical parameters of electric energy to be
monitored for improving the reliability of power systems has been discussed.
Study of Macro level Properties of SCC using GGBS and Lime stone powder
One of the major environmental concerns is the disposal of the waste materials and utilization of
industrial by products. Lime stone quarries will produce millions of tons waste dust powder every year. Having
considerable high degree of fineness in comparision to cement this material may be utilized as a partial
replacement to cement. For this purpose an experiment is conducted to investigate the possibility of using lime
stone powder in the production of SCC with combined use GGBS and how it affects the fresh and mechanical
properties of SCC. First SCC is made by replacing cement with GGBS in percentages like 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and
by taking the optimum mix with GGBS lime stone powder is blended to mix in percentages like 5, 10, 15, 20 as
a partial replacement to cement. Test results shows that the SCC mix with combination of 30% GGBS and 15%
limestone powder gives maximum compressive strength and fresh properties are also in the limits prescribed by
the EFNARC.
More from IJERD Editor (20)
A Novel Method for Prevention of Bandwidth Distributed Denial of Service Attacks
A Novel Method for Prevention of Bandwidth Distributed Denial of Service Attacks
Influence of tensile behaviour of slab on the structural Behaviour of shear c...
Influence of tensile behaviour of slab on the structural Behaviour of shear c...
Gold prospecting using Remote Sensing ‘A case study of Sudan’
Gold prospecting using Remote Sensing ‘A case study of Sudan’
Active Power Exchange in Distributed Power-Flow Controller (DPFC) At Third Ha...
Active Power Exchange in Distributed Power-Flow Controller (DPFC) At Third Ha...
Mitigation of Voltage Sag/Swell with Fuzzy Control Reduced Rating DVR
Mitigation of Voltage Sag/Swell with Fuzzy Control Reduced Rating DVR
Study on the Fused Deposition Modelling In Additive Manufacturing
Study on the Fused Deposition Modelling In Additive Manufacturing
Spyware triggering system by particular string value
Spyware triggering system by particular string value
A Blind Steganalysis on JPEG Gray Level Image Based on Statistical Features a...
A Blind Steganalysis on JPEG Gray Level Image Based on Statistical Features a...
Secure Image Transmission for Cloud Storage System Using Hybrid Scheme
Secure Image Transmission for Cloud Storage System Using Hybrid Scheme
Application of Buckley-Leverett Equation in Modeling the Radius of Invasion i...
Application of Buckley-Leverett Equation in Modeling the Radius of Invasion i...
Gesture Gaming on the World Wide Web Using an Ordinary Web Camera
Gesture Gaming on the World Wide Web Using an Ordinary Web Camera
Hardware Analysis of Resonant Frequency Converter Using Isolated Circuits And...
Hardware Analysis of Resonant Frequency Converter Using Isolated Circuits And...
Simulated Analysis of Resonant Frequency Converter Using Different Tank Circu...
Simulated Analysis of Resonant Frequency Converter Using Different Tank Circu...
“MS-Extractor: An Innovative Approach to Extract Microsatellites on „Y‟ Chrom...
“MS-Extractor: An Innovative Approach to Extract Microsatellites on „Y‟ Chrom...
Study of Macro level Properties of SCC using GGBS and Lime stone powder
Study of Macro level Properties of SCC using GGBS and Lime stone powder
Recently uploaded
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI support
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
Leading Change strategies and insights for effective change management pdf 1.pdf
Leading Change strategies and insights for effective change management pdf 1.pdf
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
De-mystifying Zero to One: Design Informed Techniques for Greenfield Innovati...
De-mystifying Zero to One: Design Informed Techniques for Greenfield Innovation With Your Product by VP of Product Design, Warner Music Group
Unsubscribed: Combat Subscription Fatigue With a Membership Mentality by Head...
Unsubscribed: Combat Subscription Fatigue With a Membership Mentality by Head of Product, Amazon Games
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish Caching
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
To Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMs
Reflecting on new architectures for knowledge based systems in light of generative ai
Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object Calisthenics
After immersing yourself in the blue book and its red counterpart, attending DDD-focused conferences, and applying tactical patterns, you're left with a crucial question: How do I ensure my design is effective? Tactical patterns within Domain-Driven Design (DDD) serve as guiding principles for creating clear and manageable domain models. However, achieving success with these patterns requires additional guidance. Interestingly, we've observed that a set of constraints initially designed for training purposes remarkably aligns with effective pattern implementation, offering a more ‘mechanical’ approach. Let's explore together how Object Calisthenics can elevate the design of your tactical DDD patterns, offering concrete help for those venturing into DDD for the first time!
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a button
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Bits & Pixels using AI for Good.........
A whirlwind tour of tech & AI for socio-environmental impact.
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Today, after several years of existence, an extremely active community and an ultra-dynamic ecosystem, Kubernetes has established itself as the de facto standard in container orchestration. Thanks to a wide range of managed services, it has never been so easy to set up a ready-to-use Kubernetes cluster.
However, this ease of use means that the subject of security in Kubernetes is often left for later, or even neglected. This exposes companies to significant risks.
In this talk, I'll show you step-by-step how to secure your Kubernetes cluster for greater peace of mind and reliability.
Recently uploaded (20)
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI support
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI support
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
Leading Change strategies and insights for effective change management pdf 1.pdf
Leading Change strategies and insights for effective change management pdf 1.pdf
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
De-mystifying Zero to One: Design Informed Techniques for Greenfield Innovati...
De-mystifying Zero to One: Design Informed Techniques for Greenfield Innovati...
Unsubscribed: Combat Subscription Fatigue With a Membership Mentality by Head...
Unsubscribed: Combat Subscription Fatigue With a Membership Mentality by Head...
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish Caching
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish Caching
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Passkeys and the Road Ahead.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Passkeys and the Road Ahead.pdf
To Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMs
To Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMs
Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object Calisthenics
Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object Calisthenics
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a button
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a button
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Science of Time and the Theory of Everything
- 1. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development e-ISSN: 2278-067X, p-ISSN: 2278-800X, www.ijerd.com Volume 10, Issue 11 (November 2014), PP.67-68 67 Science of Time and the Theory of Everything Bhausaheb D Bhosle G-11, Guruvihar Residency, Shukrawar Peth, Near Badami Well, Satara : 415002 State : Maharashtra Country: India Abstract:-"Science Of Time And The Theory Of Everything" by author Bhausaheb Bhosle includes final constants (solution). Keywords:- Theory Of Everything, heart beats, collapsed stars, developmental fetus, space time energy mass scale, azimuthals, 8th non-agisimal point etc. I. INTRODUCTION My book "Science Of Time And The Theory Of Everything" author by Bhausaheb Bhosle is based non-dual mind matter and time. This is a parting gift from Bhausaheb Bhosle an author of “Science Of Time And The Theory Of Everything”. Revolutionary crunches and pulses are determined by (designed by) lunar phase changes from starting moment to the last moment in the oscillating dynamics of the system as a whole that is 15 twinkling’s of an eye is a kashtha, 30 kashtha is an hour, 30 hours is a day, 30 days is a month so are these acquainted with the cyclic eternity knows it. This is the divine decree oscillating part at the centre of each planet (energy densities) is the fifth force (stabilising force, ecology) that stabilises everything including our genetic drive which has only one path determined by the divine decree. How nano time scale is linked to our earthly time scale – seven days is a week, four weeks is 28 days (a month), one day is 12 hours, three days is 36 hours. Biologically speaking 21 pulses is 15 seconds, in 45 seconds 63 heart beats, 84 heart beats per minute so using the divine decree our heart beats are joined with the central collapsed star by starting time for the developmental fetus .Nine months is 36 days, each day is 12 hours, 36 days is 4320 hours and 12 months is (84 * 12) = 108 hours. Total number of seconds as boson is 18,712,080,864,000,000 revolutions (years) as seconds (crunches) for all the constants so each anatomical azimuthal in all the space time energy mass scales from start to finish by retaining the same word and the same meaning. This is a divine decree determining the revolving and rotating lunar azimuthals for both. Fifteen twinkling’s of an eye is a kashta, 30 kashta is a minute, 30 minutes is an hour, 30 hours is a day simultaneously determined retaining the same word and the same meaning. The oscillating dynamics creates a fifth force (stabilising force) that stabilises everything around each node (planets, ecology) including the sun as the 8th non- agisimal point outside revolutions as years (electromagnetism) inside seconds as years (electro gravitational). Even if He is proved beyond doubt still who created the untouchability remains unanswered question. I cannot accept such a creator who creates untouchability as a stamp at birth. The last dimension of the 9th dimension can only save the situation when all the collapsed stars as His inner minds together are the untouchables. That would be the new day of the new dawn. 1st chart Revolution x 15 x 30 x 30 x 30 Sun and Planets ( 43,20,2000 ) 6,48,00,000 1,94,40,00,000 58,32,00,00,000 17,49,60,00,00,000 Moon 57,753,336 86,63,00,040 25,98,90,01,200 7,79,67,00,36,000 2,33,90,10,10,80,000 Mars ( 22,96,832 ) 3,44,52,480 1,03,35,74,400 31,00,72,32,000 9,30,21,69,60,000 Mercury's Conjunction ( 1,79,37,060 ) 26,90,55,900 8,07,16,77,000 2,42,15,03,10,000 72,64,50,93,00,000 Jupiter ( 3,64,220 ) 54,63,300 16,38,99,000 4,91,69,70,000 1,47,50,91,00,000 Venus ( 70,22,376 )
- 2. Science of Time and the Theory of Everything 68 10,53,35,640 3,16,00,69,200 94,80,20,76,000 28,44,06,22,80,000 Saturn ( 1,46,568 ) 21,98,520 6,59,55,600 1,97,86,68,000 59,36,00,40,000 Moon's apsis ( 4,88,203 ) 73,23,045 21,96,91,350 6,59,07,40,500 1,97,72,22,15,000 Moon's node ( 2,32,238 ) 34,83,570 10,45,07,100 3,13,52,13,000 94,05,63,90,000 Asterisms ( 15,82,237,828 ) 23,73,35,67,420 7,12,00,70,22,600 2,13,60,21,06,78,000 64,08,06,32,03,40,000 3rd chart Rotation x 15 x 30 x 30 x 30 Moon ( 3,24,000 ) 48,60,000 14,58,00,000 4,37,40,00,000 1,31,22,00,00,000 Moon apsis ( 38,32,8484 ) 57,49,27,260 17,24,78,17,800 5,17,43,45,34,000 1,55,23,03,60,20,000 Moon node ( 805,72,864 ) 1,20,85,92,960 36,25,77,88,800 10,87,73,36,64,000 3,26,32,00,99,20,000 Mercury ( Conjunction ) ( 10,43,209 ) 1,56,48,135 46,94,44,050 14,08,33,21,500 4,22,49,96,45,000 Venus ( Conjunction ) ( 26,64,637 ) 3,99,69,555 1,19,90,86,650 35,97,25,99,500 10,79,17,79,85,000 Sun (43,31,500 ) 6,49,72,500 1,94,91,75,000 58,47,52,50,000 17,54,25,75,00,000 Mars ( 81,46,909 ) 12,22,03,635 3,66,61,09,050 1,09,98,32,71,500 32,99,49,81,45,000 Jupiter ( 51,375,764 ) 77,06,36,460 2,31,19,09,380 6,93,57,28,14,000 2,08,07,18,44,20,000 Saturn ( 127,668,255 ) 1,91,50,23,825 57,45,07,14,750 17,23,52,14,42,500 5,17,05,64,32,75,000 Asterism ( 2,59,890,012 ) 3,89,83,50,180 1,16,95,05,05,400 35,08,51,51,62,000 10,52,55,45,48,60,000 Universe ( 18,712,080,864,000,000) 2nd chart Revolution x 15 x 30 x 30 x 30 2nd Chart Rotation x 15 x 30 x 30 x 30 sun's apsis ( 387 ) 5,805 1,74,150 52,24,500 15,67,35,000 Mars ( 214 ) 3,210 96,300 28,89,000 8,66,70,000 Mars ( 204 ) 3,060 91,800 2,75,400 8,26,20,000 Mercury ( 488 ) 7,320 2,19,600 6,58,800 19,76,40,000 Mercury ( 368 ) 5,520 1,65,600 49,68,000 14,90,40,000 Jupiter ( 174 ) 2,610 78,300 23,49,000 7,04,70,000 Jupiter ( 900 ) 13,500 4,05,000 1,21,50,000 36,45,00,000 Venus ( 903 ) 13,545 4,06,350 1,21,90,500 36,57,15,000 Venus ( 535 ) 8,025 2,40,750 72,22,500 21,66,75,000 Saturn ( 662 ) 9,930 2,97,900 89,37,000 26,81,10,000 Saturn ( 39 ) 585 17,550 5,26,500 1,57,95,000 III. CONCLUSION Galaxy is an egg. REFERENCES [1]. Ancient book Surya-Siddhanta, Rig Veda.