CONNECTING PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONS TO REALISE THEIR POTENTIAL Director Financial Incentives Ing. Joost Holleman MBA t. +31-20-6763993 e. Joostholleman@balance.nl Hudson Financial Incentives Eastern Europe grant programs
Content Hudson Financial Incentives References & example European clients European Scope & Focus Organizing Grants Grant Process Hudson approach European grant outlines Eastern Europe Specific Characteristics ESF and EFRD projects
OUR SERVICES TALENT  MANAGEMENT PERMANENT RECRUITMENT CONTRACT  PROFESSIONALS
(Y)OUR WORLD - WHERE WE DELIVER WORLDWIDE: 25 countries, 4 continents, 140 offices,  $1.2 billion in revenue (‘07) 3,600 employees globally Trading as Hudson since 2003 Listed on NASDAQ (HHGP) IN EUROPE: 18 countries, 45 offices, 47% of global revenues, 1,600 employees across Europe 1.5 million qualified professionals are in our database 7,300 permanent placements per year 2,000 contract professionals each day at client sites
Financial Incentives Grants  Grant Scan (Global, European and national) Grant Applications Grant Administration Accountancy Issues Foreign Incentive Scheme applications & Administration Tax related grants/incentives European Investment Bank loans
ing. Joost C. Holleman MBA Technical Engineering (Logistics) 1996 MBA 2005 (University of Phoenix USA) HUDSON (1997 – 2008) 1997 – 2000 Manager Finance Betuweroute - East 2000 – >  Controlling / Grants Coordinator ABNAMRO 2005 – >  Director Financial Incentives Current active sectors Retail Banking & Insurance Logistics Automotive  Industry Head Office +31-20-6763993 Support +31-20-6763993 [email_address] [email_address]
Ma Monique van der Voort 2005 Political Science 2005 VNO-NCW representative European Union in Brussels 2006 Policy officer European Commission in The Hague 2007 - > Consultant Hudson Financial Incentives Currently active European projects in: Poland Baltic States Belgium Czech Republic Slovakia Mobile +31-6-20606506 Head Office +31-20-6763993 [email_address]
Global & European References
2008 example current European clients Ahold CZ (since 2006) Prognosis > 5 million Euro in grants Czech Republic, Slovakia ICA, Rimi Baltic (since 2007) Prognosis > 3 million Euro in grants Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia,  HAVI Logistics (since 2008) Prognosis <1  million Euro in grants Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Czech Republic Fortis (since 2008) Prognosis > 5 million Euro in grants Netherlands ABNAMRO (since 2000) Prognosis > 5 million Euro in grants Rumania, Italy, Poland Hutchinson Whampoa, AS WATSON / Drogas (since 2008) Prognosis > 5 million Euro in grants The Netherlands, Europe starting up  Danone (since 2008) Prognosis <1  million Euro in grants Latvia
Scope & Focus Hudson Scope: European Social Fund (ESF) European Fund for Regional Development (EFRD) Foreign Investment Schemes (FIS) Agricultural programs (AP) European Investment Bank (EIB) Innovation (Eureka)  Focus: Training & Development Investments Logistics Product Development Innovation
Hudson general grant approach Think global, act local   Combining cross country knowledge of the client’s organizational structure with the funding specifications per country: Central approach for Central European countries Large knowledge database of European regulations (i.e. market conformity issues, eligible costs) Covering national programs/ call for proposals ESF/EFRD Flexibility in bridging client’s activities and funding programs Create more efficiency with setting up grant applications per country and project administration using the same templates and procedures Increase Grant Potential by using repeatable solutions Project according to IFRS and SOX procedures Working with local consultants Familiar with the specific regulations, criteria, latest funding news Applications made in the local language Local consultants are instructed and monitored by European project manager 75% of local consultants have worked for Government Agencies which were involved in Grant Programs from the Pre accession funds
Organizing Grants (proposal) European coordination  Monitoring grant organization Setting up repeatable solutions for various countries  Quality control European Overview Steering committee  Management level 2-4 yearly meetings Discuss progress / monitoring grant process Go / No go decisions Internal Coordinator  Project Management Organizing / operational activities External partner country level Making scans, business cases, applications Setting up grant administration Final Declaration Specialized activities (i.e. market conformity)
Quick scan phase Business case phase Grant Application Grant Administration Final Declaration
Quick Scan Phase (QS) Bridging (connecting) project with possible grant programs Getting information (Filling QS Template) to see if project meets  main  requirements Result (quick scan template):  Maximum grant opportunity in Euro’s Applicable grant programs Project could or could not be subsidized Timing when to make application Quick scan template which has to be approved by internal coordinator to go to next phase
Business Case Phase Getting additional information to examine if project / activity meets  all  requirements from grant program Result (Business Case):  Business case (PowerPoint) Maximum grant opportunity in Euro’s Which grant programs are applicable Main requirements from grant programs Risk analysis Costs for making application Business Case has to be approved by  Internal coordinator / Steering committee  to go to next phase
Grant Application Getting all necessary information to fill in grant application format Result (Grant Application):  Project planning Investment plan Project details  Application has to be approved by Steering Committee / Internal Coordinator
Project Administration / Final Declaration Phase 4: Project Administration Setup project administration Gathering necessary documents for project administration Making EU grant Administration Talks with government Result: Administration according to criteria Phase 5: Final Declaration Making final declaration Talks with government about final declaration Result: Total grant taken into P&L
European outlines European outlines (2007 – 2013)
European Grant Themes European outlines (2007 – 2013) Agriculture  Audiovisual and Media  Communication  Competition  Conference interpretation  Consumers  Culture  Development   Economic and monetary affairs  Education, training and youth  Employment and social affairs   Energy  Enlargement  Enterprise  Environment  External Relations  External Aid  External Trade  Fisheries  Fighting fraud  Freedom, Security and Justice  Humanitarian Aid  Human Rights  Information society  Public Health  Regional Policy  Research and Innovation   Sport  Statistics  Transport
Funding ESF and EFRD European outlines (2007 – 2013)
Funding opportunities Central Europe European Fund for Regional Development / INTERREG Innovation  New Production facilities / logistics Product development  IT investments Energy savings More and better jobs Grant % depends on eligible costs European Social Fund Education & Training Outplacement Globalization fund Grant +/- 50% Eureka program Innovation Inbound logistics ICT development Product development EU Policy NSRF National Strategic  Reference Framework OP Operational Programs Grant law
Strategic Vision European Union HUMAN CAPITAL  BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS OP  TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OP REGIONAL SOP COMPETITIVENESS OP  ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY   SOP  HUMAN RESOURCES SOP  ENVIRONMENT SOP TRANSPORT ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY OPs TERRITORIAL COOPERATION Objective : To reduce the economic and social development disparities between Central Europe and the EU Member States
European Social Fund (ESF)
ESF Priority Axis Central Europe 1.  Education and training in support for growth and development of knowledge based society 3.  Increasing adaptability of workers and  enterprises 4.  Modernising the Public Employment Service 6.  Promoting social inclusion 5.  Promoting active employment measures 2.  Linking life long learning and labour market
Needed for Application ESF for Training & Development grant Training Costs (external and internal trainings) Course descriptions 12 month plan for educational activities HR data Mandatory Administration for ESF ESF attendance sheet Time registration Market conformity
Characteristics ESF Administration Market Conformity Contract database “ Lowest” bidder or best quality Price check (costs according to market conformity documents) Maximizing/Minimizing  Costs  Civil effect Life long learning effect Grant Administration According to administrative ruling (HEA or ELAS) Communication rules EU communication Other issues Payback scheme employees Costs inside project period Indirect costs Development costs (making development costs eligible) Communication with Ministry
Example of ESF grant administration
European Fund for Regional Development (EFRD)
EFRD Priority Axis Central Europe 1. An innovative and eco-efficient productive system 2. Research, technological development and innovation for competitiveness 3. Information and Communication Technologies for private and public sectors 5. attractive destination for sustainable tourism and businesses 4. Increased energy efficiency & sustainable development of the energy system 1. Improvement of regional and local transport infrastructure 2. Improvement of social infrastructure 3. Strengthening the regional and local business environment 5. Support of sustainable urban development 4. Sustainable development of regional and local tourism Competitiveness Regional Operational Programs
Characteristics EFRD Projects Call for proposals are different in each country, but topics are more or less the same (new technology, job creation, production investments, IT, energy reduction, R&D) Each call has it’s specific criteria and these criteria can change each year depending on the available budget  Project application level differs between simple form and complex business plan depending on the investment amount Project administration is rather straight forward compared to other EU funds, but project criteria can sometimes be hard to match with companies activities and timing  Funding support is +/- 30% of the investment (depending on eligible costs)
Example of grant opportunities
The Seventh Framework Programme for research and technological development  (FP7)
Understanding FP7 The Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) bundles all research-related EU initiatives together under a common roof playing a crucial role in reaching the goals of growth, competitiveness and employment; along with a new Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP), Education and Training programmes, and Structural and Cohesion Funds for regional convergence and competitiveness. It is also a key pillar for the European Research Area (ERA).
FP7 Budget, 50,5 Billion Euro (ex Euratom) FP7 consists  of four programs: Division of budget:
FP7 – SP Cooperation – 10 themes (million Euro) Health 6.100  Food, agriculture and fisheries, and biotechnology 9.135 Information and communication technologies 9.050 Nanotechnologies, materials and production 3.475 Energy 2.350 Environment 1.890 Transport 4.160 Socioeconomic research   623 Space 1.430 Security 1.400 Total   32.413
FP7 – Type of projects Project Types describe the nature of funding open to participants in FP7. Collaborative Research Projects : Research projects carried out by consortia from different countries, aiming at the development of new knowledge, technology, products or common resources for research. Size and scope can vary. Networks of Excellence : The main aim of a NoE is to integrate research at a European level. Thus, participants are paid on the basis of degree of integration achieved and the number of researchers actively participating in the network rather than research outputs. Coordination and Support Actions : SA fund studies or other measures in support of the relevant Work Programme. Coordination Actions (CA) fund networking research that previously was primarily carried out at national level. Individual projects : Projects carried out by individual research teams (mainly used in the ‘IDEAS’ programme). Marie Curie Actions : Funding of research training and mobility of researchers via both individual as ‘host driven’ actions. SME specific actions
FP7 – max. reimbursement rates   Reimbursement depends on the type of action and/or activity, and the type of the beneficiary: Research and technological development : up to 50% of eligible costs,  or up to 75% for: -  Non profit  public bodies  - Secondary and higher education establishments - Research organisations - SMEs - Security related research, for highly reliable capabilities with impact on security of European citizens and targeted to a limited number of public users Demonstration : up to 50% Other   including management: up to 100% Actions that will be reimbursed up to 100%: Frontier research (IDEAS) Coordination and Support Actions (CSA) Training and career development of researchers (PEOPLE)
Eureka Program  (for R&D and innovation)
Criteria for the Eureka Program International Innovation Projects, a  pan-European network for market-oriented, industrial R&D Goal of EUREKA: to raise the productivity and competitiveness of European industry and national economies through its ‘bottom-up’ approach to technological innovation.  The EUREKA  Umbrellas  are thematic networks which focus on a specific technology area or business sector.
 
Czech Republic EU grant structure and funding programs
Example Czech Budget 2007 - 2013 Eligible regions European outlines (2007 – 2013)
Czech Republic Grant Budget 2007-2013
Example program overview Czech Republic 2009
Poland EU grant structure and funding programs
Poland Grant Budget 2007 - 2013 European outlines (2007 – 2013)
   S upport for complex development of investment plots    Support for Industrial Parks  and cent re s   for technological development etc.  Support for investor service centres  In vestmen t s proje c ts up to  2,3 mln EUR - 9  regions   - 9 regions      - 1 region    - 16 regions Prepared by the local self-  governments  Concern the needs of the  region s Support on basis of Regional Operational Programmes                                                                 Warmińsko -Mazurskie Podlaskie Mazowieckie Lubelskie Podkarpackie Małopolskie Śląskie Świętokrzyskie     Łódzkie Pomorskie* Zachodniopomorskie Kujawsko-pomorskie* Wielkopolskie Lubuskie Dolnośląskie     Opolskie  
Strategic objectives Operational Program Human Capital (ESF) 1. Improving the level of professional activity and ability to employing persons who are unemployed or professionally passive. 2. Reducing areas of social exclusion. 3. Enhancing the adaptability of employees and enterprises to changes that take place in the economy. 4. Propagation of education in the society on each education level with concurrent improvement of the quality of educational services and their stronger correlation with needs of knowledge based economy. 5. Enhancing the potential of public administration as regards development of law and policies and providing high quality services, and strengthening partnership mechanisms. 6. Enhancing territorial cohesion.
Training &  Development Financial Plan Poland Grant percentage on average  50% of total costs
Criteria Call for proposals ESF Poland Sub-measure 2.1.1 consist of three kinds of projects: Transregional projects:  closed  training (general and specialized) - trainings in at least two provinces - minimum project value: 0,1 mln euro (400.000 PLN) - maximum project value: 4,6 mln euro (15.000.000 PLN) - trainings  prepared on the basis of the company ’s  individual development strateg ies   Nationwide projects:  open  trainings (general and specialized) - trainings for employees from at least 5 different provinces - trainings are given in at least 5 provinces - minimum project value: 0,1 mln euro (400.000 PLN) - maximum project value: 6,2 mln euro (20.000.000 PLN) Postgraduate studies:    - minimum project value: 0,1 mln euro (400.000 PLN)   - maximum project value: 6,2 mln euro (20.000.000 PLN) Grant percentage for large companies varies between 35% and 60 % of the total project costs
Hungary EU grant structure and funding programs
Hungary Grant budget 2007-2013
Slovakia EU grant structure and funding programs
Slovakia Grant Budget 2007-2013

Grants &amp; Incentives Eastern Europe 2009

  • 1.
    CONNECTING PEOPLE ANDORGANIZATIONS TO REALISE THEIR POTENTIAL Director Financial Incentives Ing. Joost Holleman MBA t. +31-20-6763993 e. Joostholleman@balance.nl Hudson Financial Incentives Eastern Europe grant programs
  • 2.
    Content Hudson FinancialIncentives References & example European clients European Scope & Focus Organizing Grants Grant Process Hudson approach European grant outlines Eastern Europe Specific Characteristics ESF and EFRD projects
  • 3.
    OUR SERVICES TALENT MANAGEMENT PERMANENT RECRUITMENT CONTRACT PROFESSIONALS
  • 4.
    (Y)OUR WORLD -WHERE WE DELIVER WORLDWIDE: 25 countries, 4 continents, 140 offices, $1.2 billion in revenue (‘07) 3,600 employees globally Trading as Hudson since 2003 Listed on NASDAQ (HHGP) IN EUROPE: 18 countries, 45 offices, 47% of global revenues, 1,600 employees across Europe 1.5 million qualified professionals are in our database 7,300 permanent placements per year 2,000 contract professionals each day at client sites
  • 5.
    Financial Incentives Grants Grant Scan (Global, European and national) Grant Applications Grant Administration Accountancy Issues Foreign Incentive Scheme applications & Administration Tax related grants/incentives European Investment Bank loans
  • 6.
    ing. Joost C.Holleman MBA Technical Engineering (Logistics) 1996 MBA 2005 (University of Phoenix USA) HUDSON (1997 – 2008) 1997 – 2000 Manager Finance Betuweroute - East 2000 – > Controlling / Grants Coordinator ABNAMRO 2005 – > Director Financial Incentives Current active sectors Retail Banking & Insurance Logistics Automotive Industry Head Office +31-20-6763993 Support +31-20-6763993 [email_address] [email_address]
  • 7.
    Ma Monique vander Voort 2005 Political Science 2005 VNO-NCW representative European Union in Brussels 2006 Policy officer European Commission in The Hague 2007 - > Consultant Hudson Financial Incentives Currently active European projects in: Poland Baltic States Belgium Czech Republic Slovakia Mobile +31-6-20606506 Head Office +31-20-6763993 [email_address]
  • 8.
  • 9.
    2008 example currentEuropean clients Ahold CZ (since 2006) Prognosis > 5 million Euro in grants Czech Republic, Slovakia ICA, Rimi Baltic (since 2007) Prognosis > 3 million Euro in grants Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, HAVI Logistics (since 2008) Prognosis <1 million Euro in grants Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Czech Republic Fortis (since 2008) Prognosis > 5 million Euro in grants Netherlands ABNAMRO (since 2000) Prognosis > 5 million Euro in grants Rumania, Italy, Poland Hutchinson Whampoa, AS WATSON / Drogas (since 2008) Prognosis > 5 million Euro in grants The Netherlands, Europe starting up Danone (since 2008) Prognosis <1 million Euro in grants Latvia
  • 10.
    Scope & FocusHudson Scope: European Social Fund (ESF) European Fund for Regional Development (EFRD) Foreign Investment Schemes (FIS) Agricultural programs (AP) European Investment Bank (EIB) Innovation (Eureka) Focus: Training & Development Investments Logistics Product Development Innovation
  • 11.
    Hudson general grantapproach Think global, act local Combining cross country knowledge of the client’s organizational structure with the funding specifications per country: Central approach for Central European countries Large knowledge database of European regulations (i.e. market conformity issues, eligible costs) Covering national programs/ call for proposals ESF/EFRD Flexibility in bridging client’s activities and funding programs Create more efficiency with setting up grant applications per country and project administration using the same templates and procedures Increase Grant Potential by using repeatable solutions Project according to IFRS and SOX procedures Working with local consultants Familiar with the specific regulations, criteria, latest funding news Applications made in the local language Local consultants are instructed and monitored by European project manager 75% of local consultants have worked for Government Agencies which were involved in Grant Programs from the Pre accession funds
  • 12.
    Organizing Grants (proposal)European coordination Monitoring grant organization Setting up repeatable solutions for various countries Quality control European Overview Steering committee Management level 2-4 yearly meetings Discuss progress / monitoring grant process Go / No go decisions Internal Coordinator Project Management Organizing / operational activities External partner country level Making scans, business cases, applications Setting up grant administration Final Declaration Specialized activities (i.e. market conformity)
  • 13.
    Quick scan phaseBusiness case phase Grant Application Grant Administration Final Declaration
  • 14.
    Quick Scan Phase(QS) Bridging (connecting) project with possible grant programs Getting information (Filling QS Template) to see if project meets main requirements Result (quick scan template): Maximum grant opportunity in Euro’s Applicable grant programs Project could or could not be subsidized Timing when to make application Quick scan template which has to be approved by internal coordinator to go to next phase
  • 15.
    Business Case PhaseGetting additional information to examine if project / activity meets all requirements from grant program Result (Business Case): Business case (PowerPoint) Maximum grant opportunity in Euro’s Which grant programs are applicable Main requirements from grant programs Risk analysis Costs for making application Business Case has to be approved by Internal coordinator / Steering committee to go to next phase
  • 16.
    Grant Application Gettingall necessary information to fill in grant application format Result (Grant Application): Project planning Investment plan Project details Application has to be approved by Steering Committee / Internal Coordinator
  • 17.
    Project Administration /Final Declaration Phase 4: Project Administration Setup project administration Gathering necessary documents for project administration Making EU grant Administration Talks with government Result: Administration according to criteria Phase 5: Final Declaration Making final declaration Talks with government about final declaration Result: Total grant taken into P&L
  • 18.
    European outlines Europeanoutlines (2007 – 2013)
  • 19.
    European Grant ThemesEuropean outlines (2007 – 2013) Agriculture Audiovisual and Media Communication Competition Conference interpretation Consumers Culture Development Economic and monetary affairs Education, training and youth Employment and social affairs Energy Enlargement Enterprise Environment External Relations External Aid External Trade Fisheries Fighting fraud Freedom, Security and Justice Humanitarian Aid Human Rights Information society Public Health Regional Policy Research and Innovation Sport Statistics Transport
  • 20.
    Funding ESF andEFRD European outlines (2007 – 2013)
  • 21.
    Funding opportunities CentralEurope European Fund for Regional Development / INTERREG Innovation New Production facilities / logistics Product development IT investments Energy savings More and better jobs Grant % depends on eligible costs European Social Fund Education & Training Outplacement Globalization fund Grant +/- 50% Eureka program Innovation Inbound logistics ICT development Product development EU Policy NSRF National Strategic Reference Framework OP Operational Programs Grant law
  • 22.
    Strategic Vision EuropeanUnion HUMAN CAPITAL BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS OP TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OP REGIONAL SOP COMPETITIVENESS OP ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY SOP HUMAN RESOURCES SOP ENVIRONMENT SOP TRANSPORT ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY OPs TERRITORIAL COOPERATION Objective : To reduce the economic and social development disparities between Central Europe and the EU Member States
  • 23.
  • 24.
    ESF Priority AxisCentral Europe 1. Education and training in support for growth and development of knowledge based society 3. Increasing adaptability of workers and enterprises 4. Modernising the Public Employment Service 6. Promoting social inclusion 5. Promoting active employment measures 2. Linking life long learning and labour market
  • 25.
    Needed for ApplicationESF for Training & Development grant Training Costs (external and internal trainings) Course descriptions 12 month plan for educational activities HR data Mandatory Administration for ESF ESF attendance sheet Time registration Market conformity
  • 26.
    Characteristics ESF AdministrationMarket Conformity Contract database “ Lowest” bidder or best quality Price check (costs according to market conformity documents) Maximizing/Minimizing Costs Civil effect Life long learning effect Grant Administration According to administrative ruling (HEA or ELAS) Communication rules EU communication Other issues Payback scheme employees Costs inside project period Indirect costs Development costs (making development costs eligible) Communication with Ministry
  • 27.
    Example of ESFgrant administration
  • 28.
    European Fund forRegional Development (EFRD)
  • 29.
    EFRD Priority AxisCentral Europe 1. An innovative and eco-efficient productive system 2. Research, technological development and innovation for competitiveness 3. Information and Communication Technologies for private and public sectors 5. attractive destination for sustainable tourism and businesses 4. Increased energy efficiency & sustainable development of the energy system 1. Improvement of regional and local transport infrastructure 2. Improvement of social infrastructure 3. Strengthening the regional and local business environment 5. Support of sustainable urban development 4. Sustainable development of regional and local tourism Competitiveness Regional Operational Programs
  • 30.
    Characteristics EFRD ProjectsCall for proposals are different in each country, but topics are more or less the same (new technology, job creation, production investments, IT, energy reduction, R&D) Each call has it’s specific criteria and these criteria can change each year depending on the available budget Project application level differs between simple form and complex business plan depending on the investment amount Project administration is rather straight forward compared to other EU funds, but project criteria can sometimes be hard to match with companies activities and timing Funding support is +/- 30% of the investment (depending on eligible costs)
  • 31.
    Example of grantopportunities
  • 32.
    The Seventh FrameworkProgramme for research and technological development (FP7)
  • 33.
    Understanding FP7 TheSeventh Framework Programme (FP7) bundles all research-related EU initiatives together under a common roof playing a crucial role in reaching the goals of growth, competitiveness and employment; along with a new Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP), Education and Training programmes, and Structural and Cohesion Funds for regional convergence and competitiveness. It is also a key pillar for the European Research Area (ERA).
  • 34.
    FP7 Budget, 50,5Billion Euro (ex Euratom) FP7 consists of four programs: Division of budget:
  • 35.
    FP7 – SPCooperation – 10 themes (million Euro) Health 6.100 Food, agriculture and fisheries, and biotechnology 9.135 Information and communication technologies 9.050 Nanotechnologies, materials and production 3.475 Energy 2.350 Environment 1.890 Transport 4.160 Socioeconomic research 623 Space 1.430 Security 1.400 Total 32.413
  • 36.
    FP7 – Typeof projects Project Types describe the nature of funding open to participants in FP7. Collaborative Research Projects : Research projects carried out by consortia from different countries, aiming at the development of new knowledge, technology, products or common resources for research. Size and scope can vary. Networks of Excellence : The main aim of a NoE is to integrate research at a European level. Thus, participants are paid on the basis of degree of integration achieved and the number of researchers actively participating in the network rather than research outputs. Coordination and Support Actions : SA fund studies or other measures in support of the relevant Work Programme. Coordination Actions (CA) fund networking research that previously was primarily carried out at national level. Individual projects : Projects carried out by individual research teams (mainly used in the ‘IDEAS’ programme). Marie Curie Actions : Funding of research training and mobility of researchers via both individual as ‘host driven’ actions. SME specific actions
  • 37.
    FP7 – max.reimbursement rates Reimbursement depends on the type of action and/or activity, and the type of the beneficiary: Research and technological development : up to 50% of eligible costs, or up to 75% for: - Non profit public bodies - Secondary and higher education establishments - Research organisations - SMEs - Security related research, for highly reliable capabilities with impact on security of European citizens and targeted to a limited number of public users Demonstration : up to 50% Other including management: up to 100% Actions that will be reimbursed up to 100%: Frontier research (IDEAS) Coordination and Support Actions (CSA) Training and career development of researchers (PEOPLE)
  • 38.
    Eureka Program (for R&D and innovation)
  • 39.
    Criteria for theEureka Program International Innovation Projects, a pan-European network for market-oriented, industrial R&D Goal of EUREKA: to raise the productivity and competitiveness of European industry and national economies through its ‘bottom-up’ approach to technological innovation. The EUREKA Umbrellas are thematic networks which focus on a specific technology area or business sector.
  • 40.
  • 41.
    Czech Republic EUgrant structure and funding programs
  • 42.
    Example Czech Budget2007 - 2013 Eligible regions European outlines (2007 – 2013)
  • 43.
    Czech Republic GrantBudget 2007-2013
  • 44.
    Example program overviewCzech Republic 2009
  • 45.
    Poland EU grantstructure and funding programs
  • 46.
    Poland Grant Budget2007 - 2013 European outlines (2007 – 2013)
  • 47.
    S upport for complex development of investment plots  Support for Industrial Parks and cent re s for technological development etc. Support for investor service centres In vestmen t s proje c ts up to 2,3 mln EUR - 9 regions - 9 regions  - 1 region  - 16 regions Prepared by the local self- governments Concern the needs of the region s Support on basis of Regional Operational Programmes                                 Warmińsko -Mazurskie Podlaskie Mazowieckie Lubelskie Podkarpackie Małopolskie Śląskie Świętokrzyskie  Łódzkie Pomorskie* Zachodniopomorskie Kujawsko-pomorskie* Wielkopolskie Lubuskie Dolnośląskie  Opolskie 
  • 48.
    Strategic objectives OperationalProgram Human Capital (ESF) 1. Improving the level of professional activity and ability to employing persons who are unemployed or professionally passive. 2. Reducing areas of social exclusion. 3. Enhancing the adaptability of employees and enterprises to changes that take place in the economy. 4. Propagation of education in the society on each education level with concurrent improvement of the quality of educational services and their stronger correlation with needs of knowledge based economy. 5. Enhancing the potential of public administration as regards development of law and policies and providing high quality services, and strengthening partnership mechanisms. 6. Enhancing territorial cohesion.
  • 49.
    Training & Development Financial Plan Poland Grant percentage on average 50% of total costs
  • 50.
    Criteria Call forproposals ESF Poland Sub-measure 2.1.1 consist of three kinds of projects: Transregional projects: closed training (general and specialized) - trainings in at least two provinces - minimum project value: 0,1 mln euro (400.000 PLN) - maximum project value: 4,6 mln euro (15.000.000 PLN) - trainings prepared on the basis of the company ’s individual development strateg ies Nationwide projects: open trainings (general and specialized) - trainings for employees from at least 5 different provinces - trainings are given in at least 5 provinces - minimum project value: 0,1 mln euro (400.000 PLN) - maximum project value: 6,2 mln euro (20.000.000 PLN) Postgraduate studies: - minimum project value: 0,1 mln euro (400.000 PLN) - maximum project value: 6,2 mln euro (20.000.000 PLN) Grant percentage for large companies varies between 35% and 60 % of the total project costs
  • 51.
    Hungary EU grantstructure and funding programs
  • 52.
  • 53.
    Slovakia EU grantstructure and funding programs
  • 54.