Gov pp revised2010
•Download as PPT, PDF•
0 likes•154 views
This document summarizes the landmark Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona from 1966. It discusses that Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1963 in Phoenix, Arizona for kidnapping, rape, and robbery but was not read his rights. The case established that the prosecution may not use statements obtained from defendants during interrogation unless they were informed of their Fifth Amendment rights to remain silent and have an attorney present. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Miranda, finding that his statements made during interrogation could not be used against him since he wasn't read his rights. Miranda only had to serve 1/3 of his 20-30 year sentence.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
John Adams
John Adams was the second president of the United States, serving from 1797 to 1801. He had previously been the vice president under George Washington and had signed the Declaration of Independence. Adams graduated from Harvard College and helped convince the army to appoint Washington as their general.
Sam j's president pp
James Madison was the 4th President of the United States, serving from 1809 to 1817. He was nicknamed the "Father of the Constitution" and helped draft and promote the U.S. Constitution. Madison was born in Virginia in 1751, married Dolley Payne Todd in 1794, and had no children despite being Episcopalian and educated at Princeton University as a lawyer and Democratic-Republican politician.
U.S. Case Law
This document summarizes three landmark US Supreme Court cases:
Tinker v. Des Moines established students' right to free speech in school, ruling in favor of students suspended for wearing armbands in protest of the Vietnam War. Korematsu v. United States upheld the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII. Miranda v. Arizona ruled that individuals must be informed of their rights against self-incrimination when being questioned by police.
What am i who am i review - march 2011
The document provides information about key people, events, inventions, and movements of the Westward Expansion Era in the United States between 1801-1865. It describes states of the Confederacy and Union, territories acquired by the US including the Louisiana Purchase and Oregon Territory, and inventions like the cotton gin and steamboat that impacted the period. Important figures mentioned include Abraham Lincoln, Harriet Tubman, Frederick Douglass, and leaders of the Abolitionist and Suffrage Movements. Key events covered are the Civil War and California Gold Rush.
History graded oral discussion
1. The early anti-war movement involved civil rights activists who saw parallels between the oppression of black Americans and the Vietnamese people fighting for freedom from American violence and occupation. The release of the Pentagon Papers in 1971 increased public distrust in the government by revealing lies and secret truths about the reasons for American involvement in the war.
2. Protests against the Vietnam War came from many groups, including African Americans, students, Roman Catholics, and soldiers. Students organized large protests on college campuses against ROTC programs and being drafted into a war they opposed. Soldiers faced punishment for speaking out against the war through underground newspapers and demonstrations.
3. The shooting of student protesters at Kent State University in 1970 sparked widespread
Thurgood Marshall by Grace
Thurgood Marshall was the first African American Supreme Court justice. He was born in 1908 in Baltimore, Maryland and grew up debating court cases with his family. Marshall fought against segregation his whole career, arguing landmark cases that ended segregation and led to the historic 1954 Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision. He served on the Supreme Court from 1967 to 1991, influencing equality and civil rights in the United States.
Thurgood
Thurgood Marshall was the first African American Supreme Court justice who fought for civil rights and equal treatment of black people under the law. He was born in 1908 and died in 1993 at age 84 from heart problems. As a lawyer, Marshall helped end segregation in schools and fought against discrimination, including being denied admission to the University of Maryland law school due to his race.
Thurgood Marshall Courage Project
Thurgood Marshall was an influential civil rights lawyer and activist who became the first African American Supreme Court justice. Some key events:
- 1938: Marshall became head of the NAACP and began arguing civil rights cases.
- 1956: Marshall took on multiple cases challenging racial segregation at colleges in Alabama despite threats and violence from protesters.
- 1967: Marshall was appointed as a Supreme Court Justice, where he served until 1991 and heard many cases related to racial equality and justice.
- Throughout his career, Marshall demonstrated courage and determination in advocating for civil rights despite facing significant opposition and danger at times. He played a pivotal role in the civil rights movement and expanding equal protection under the law.
Recommended
John Adams
John Adams was the second president of the United States, serving from 1797 to 1801. He had previously been the vice president under George Washington and had signed the Declaration of Independence. Adams graduated from Harvard College and helped convince the army to appoint Washington as their general.
Sam j's president pp
James Madison was the 4th President of the United States, serving from 1809 to 1817. He was nicknamed the "Father of the Constitution" and helped draft and promote the U.S. Constitution. Madison was born in Virginia in 1751, married Dolley Payne Todd in 1794, and had no children despite being Episcopalian and educated at Princeton University as a lawyer and Democratic-Republican politician.
U.S. Case Law
This document summarizes three landmark US Supreme Court cases:
Tinker v. Des Moines established students' right to free speech in school, ruling in favor of students suspended for wearing armbands in protest of the Vietnam War. Korematsu v. United States upheld the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII. Miranda v. Arizona ruled that individuals must be informed of their rights against self-incrimination when being questioned by police.
What am i who am i review - march 2011
The document provides information about key people, events, inventions, and movements of the Westward Expansion Era in the United States between 1801-1865. It describes states of the Confederacy and Union, territories acquired by the US including the Louisiana Purchase and Oregon Territory, and inventions like the cotton gin and steamboat that impacted the period. Important figures mentioned include Abraham Lincoln, Harriet Tubman, Frederick Douglass, and leaders of the Abolitionist and Suffrage Movements. Key events covered are the Civil War and California Gold Rush.
History graded oral discussion
1. The early anti-war movement involved civil rights activists who saw parallels between the oppression of black Americans and the Vietnamese people fighting for freedom from American violence and occupation. The release of the Pentagon Papers in 1971 increased public distrust in the government by revealing lies and secret truths about the reasons for American involvement in the war.
2. Protests against the Vietnam War came from many groups, including African Americans, students, Roman Catholics, and soldiers. Students organized large protests on college campuses against ROTC programs and being drafted into a war they opposed. Soldiers faced punishment for speaking out against the war through underground newspapers and demonstrations.
3. The shooting of student protesters at Kent State University in 1970 sparked widespread
Thurgood Marshall by Grace
Thurgood Marshall was the first African American Supreme Court justice. He was born in 1908 in Baltimore, Maryland and grew up debating court cases with his family. Marshall fought against segregation his whole career, arguing landmark cases that ended segregation and led to the historic 1954 Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision. He served on the Supreme Court from 1967 to 1991, influencing equality and civil rights in the United States.
Thurgood
Thurgood Marshall was the first African American Supreme Court justice who fought for civil rights and equal treatment of black people under the law. He was born in 1908 and died in 1993 at age 84 from heart problems. As a lawyer, Marshall helped end segregation in schools and fought against discrimination, including being denied admission to the University of Maryland law school due to his race.
Thurgood Marshall Courage Project
Thurgood Marshall was an influential civil rights lawyer and activist who became the first African American Supreme Court justice. Some key events:
- 1938: Marshall became head of the NAACP and began arguing civil rights cases.
- 1956: Marshall took on multiple cases challenging racial segregation at colleges in Alabama despite threats and violence from protesters.
- 1967: Marshall was appointed as a Supreme Court Justice, where he served until 1991 and heard many cases related to racial equality and justice.
- Throughout his career, Marshall demonstrated courage and determination in advocating for civil rights despite facing significant opposition and danger at times. He played a pivotal role in the civil rights movement and expanding equal protection under the law.
Thurgood Marshall
Thurgood Marshall was a hero who fought for equal rights for all. As a lawyer, he argued before the Supreme Court in landmark civil rights cases that helped overturn racial segregation laws and expand equal protection under the law. He grew up in segregated Baltimore and later became the first African American Supreme Court Justice. Marshall died on January 24, 1993 after dedicating his career to advocating for civil rights and equal justice.
Notable people of the Revolutionary War
This document provides brief biographies of several notable Virginians from the Revolutionary War period, including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Armistead Lafayette, Patrick Henry, George Mason, and James Madison. It describes their roles in the founding of the United States, such as Washington leading the Continental Army, Jefferson writing the Declaration of Independence, and Madison taking notes at the Constitutional Convention.
Thurgood Marshall
Thurgood Marshall was the first African American Supreme Court Justice. He was born in 1908 in Baltimore, Maryland and faced segregation as a child. Marshall studied the US Constitution and became a lawyer, arguing landmark civil rights cases that challenged segregation, including Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 which ruled that public school segregation was unconstitutional. Marshall dedicated his life and legal career to achieving justice and equal rights for African Americans under the law.
Fannie lou hamer
Fannie Lou Hamer was a civil rights activist born in 1917 who experienced extreme racism and violence fighting for voting rights in Mississippi. In 1963, she and others were removed from a bus in Winona, Mississippi and beaten severely in a jail cell for attempting to register black voters. Despite this, Hamer continued her activism and in 1964 challenged an all-white Mississippi delegation at the Democratic National Convention as part of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party to represent black voters who had been prevented from voting. Her efforts helped lead to the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965.
Jeannette Rankin
Jeanette Rankin was the first woman elected to Congress in 1916. She voted against U.S. entry into both World Wars, making her the only member of Congress to vote no to declaring war on Japan after the attack on Pearl Harbor. Rankin was a lifelong pacifist and advocate for women's rights, working for suffrage and serving as a lobbyist for international women's peace organizations after leaving Congress. She remained politically active into her 90s, leading anti-Vietnam War protests.
EDCT 203 ppt
This document provides an interactive presentation about the eight US Presidents who were from Ohio. It gives some brief background information about Ohio and each President. For each President, it lists their name, dates, and one or two interesting facts. It then has a short quiz to test knowledge of the Presidents. The overall purpose is to educate students about Ohio's contribution of eight US Presidents, nicknamed the "Mother of Presidents."
Criminal Rights Court Cases
The document summarizes important Supreme Court Chief Justices and key decisions from the Marshall, Warren, and Burger Courts. It focuses on the Warren Court's expansion of criminal rights and civil liberties cases in the 1960s, including Gideon v. Wainwright, Escobedo v. Illinois, Mapp v. Ohio, and Miranda v. Arizona, the latter of which established that police must inform suspects of their right to remain silent and right to an attorney upon arrest. The document also briefly discusses the Korematsu, Roe v. Wade, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey decisions regarding civil rights and privacy issues.
Thurgood marshall
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer and civil rights activist who served as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court from 1967 to 1991. He was born in 1908 in Baltimore, Maryland and fought against unfair laws facing African Americans through his legal work, helping to end segregation and arguing pivotal civil rights cases like Brown v. Board of Education. Marshall believed strongly in justice, freedom of expression, and respect for authority under the law.
Fannie Lou Hamer
Fannie Lou Hamer was a civil rights activist who fought for racial equality and justice. She was born in Mississippi in 1917 and worked as a sharecropper until she was 45 years old. In 1962, she began attending voter registration workshops and helped register black voters, facing retaliation from white landowners. In 1964, she was severely beaten in jail after being arrested for attempting to register to vote. Despite threats and violence, Hamer continued her activism and helped form the Freedom Democratic Party to challenge the all-white Democratic delegation from Mississippi. She testified about her beating at the 1964 Democratic National Convention. Later, she worked to establish Freedom Farms cooperative to help families in need.
32nd and elmira
Three men have been preliminarily charged in connection with a shooting at a birthday party in Indianapolis on August 3rd, 2010 that left two people dead and eight victims total. Damion Martin, Antwan Williams, and Devin Staten have been charged with conspiracy to commit murder, attempt murder, and aggravated battery. All three men are being held without bond as the homicide investigation continues. Anyone with information is asked to contact authorities.
Chapter13
The juvenile justice system originated from the child-saving movement which argued the state has a responsibility to protect children. The first juvenile court was established in Illinois in 1899 and differed from adult courts by having no juries, different terminology, and focus on rehabilitation over punishment. A series of Supreme Court cases from 1966-1975 gave juveniles some due process rights like right to counsel. Today states set their own juvenile justice policies but the system focuses on rehabilitation for youth offenders.
Juvenile Law
The juvenile court system aims to rehabilitate young offenders rather than punish them. It handles two types of cases: neglect cases, where youth are abused by caregivers and the court can place them in foster homes, and delinquency cases, where a juvenile commits a crime. For non-violent offenders, the court may divert them into rehabilitation programs instead of formal proceedings. If tried, juveniles are not entitled to juries, their identities are kept secret, and they have rights like legal counsel to protect them. Successful completion of probation results in charges being dropped.
Values Matter Presentation by Rakesh Malhotra October 2011
This document discusses five global human values: health, happiness, peace, prosperity, and productivity & innovation. It notes that human values provide inherent energy, dynamism, and choices between good and bad options that can lead to either problems or adventure and achievement. The document also outlines several core human values and sub-values, and discusses the Hindu concept of purushartha - the four goals of human existence: dharma, artha, kama, and moksha. It emphasizes that behaviors are directed by mind and values.
Laser therapycentersofgreaterwashingtonbrochure
Patient information brochure on benefits of Avicenna High Power Laser Therapy.
2012 Michigan Road Scholar Orientation
The document provides an agenda and information for the 2012 Michigan Road Scholars Tour Orientation. The tour will take place from April 30 to May 4 and will expose participants to Michigan's economy, government, culture, education and social issues. Key stops include the State Capitol, Sault Ste. Marie, Traverse City, Grand Rapids, Benton Harbor, Detroit and discussions with leaders across sectors. Participants will learn about the state and communities that many University of Michigan students call home.
Interview question
This document contains questions from an interview about an educator's use of information and communication technology (ICT) for teaching visual arts and design. It asks about the educator's confidence and experience with various ICT skills, the types of digital materials used for teaching, how ICT is used to prepare lessons and provide feedback/assessment, and the perceived impact of ICT use on students and teaching. The educator is also asked to rate their level of agreement with several statements about how ICT should be used by students and its impact on student outcomes and teacher skills/presentation.
TeamSevak
This document proposes solutions to improve primary healthcare access in rural India. It discusses establishing mobile hospitals with basic medical facilities to increase accessibility and availability in remote villages. It also suggests developing affordable medical technologies like devices for non-invasive anemia and blood sugar detection. An Interactive Voice Response System is proposed to provide medical advice and disease management via telephone. Health awareness would be raised through village campaigns, pamphlets and utilizing ASHA workers. Policy recommendations include regulating medical devices, funding healthcare startups and establishing a rural telehealth program using mobile phones. The goal is to universalize quality primary healthcare access for rural India's population.
VENDER UNA MESA
Un vendedor publicó una foto de una mesa en venta en eBay sin darse cuenta de que también se veía su entrepierna en el espejo detrás. El mensaje advierte a otros vendedores que revisen cuidadosamente las fotos que publican en línea para evitar exponer partes privadas de su cuerpo sin darse cuenta.
Housekeepers
The presentation discusses housekeepers and their typical work, which includes cleaning bathrooms, rooms, kitchens, and doing laundry as well as taking care of children. While housekeepers can help by doing all the work, there are also disadvantages such as people becoming lazy, housekeepers potentially hitting children or stealing. New technologies may allow housewives to need housekeepers less. The presentation concludes with asking if there are any questions.
Socially Diverse #SocDiv #prsa_ic
Socially Diverse was created to highlight unique, interesting, diverse conversations online, both projects and the people who lead them.
Klickitat County Community Health Needs Assessment Data and Findings Septem...
The document summarizes findings from a community health needs assessment conducted in Klickitat County, Washington. It describes the data collection process, demographics of the county population, survey results on access to and satisfaction with healthcare, and top health issues. Key findings include the county population is older and growing older than the state average, over 80% of residents have a primary care provider but access is lower in East County, and over 70% of residents gave high ratings to their healthcare in the last year.
More Related Content
What's hot
Thurgood Marshall
Thurgood Marshall was a hero who fought for equal rights for all. As a lawyer, he argued before the Supreme Court in landmark civil rights cases that helped overturn racial segregation laws and expand equal protection under the law. He grew up in segregated Baltimore and later became the first African American Supreme Court Justice. Marshall died on January 24, 1993 after dedicating his career to advocating for civil rights and equal justice.
Notable people of the Revolutionary War
This document provides brief biographies of several notable Virginians from the Revolutionary War period, including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Armistead Lafayette, Patrick Henry, George Mason, and James Madison. It describes their roles in the founding of the United States, such as Washington leading the Continental Army, Jefferson writing the Declaration of Independence, and Madison taking notes at the Constitutional Convention.
Thurgood Marshall
Thurgood Marshall was the first African American Supreme Court Justice. He was born in 1908 in Baltimore, Maryland and faced segregation as a child. Marshall studied the US Constitution and became a lawyer, arguing landmark civil rights cases that challenged segregation, including Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 which ruled that public school segregation was unconstitutional. Marshall dedicated his life and legal career to achieving justice and equal rights for African Americans under the law.
Fannie lou hamer
Fannie Lou Hamer was a civil rights activist born in 1917 who experienced extreme racism and violence fighting for voting rights in Mississippi. In 1963, she and others were removed from a bus in Winona, Mississippi and beaten severely in a jail cell for attempting to register black voters. Despite this, Hamer continued her activism and in 1964 challenged an all-white Mississippi delegation at the Democratic National Convention as part of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party to represent black voters who had been prevented from voting. Her efforts helped lead to the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965.
Jeannette Rankin
Jeanette Rankin was the first woman elected to Congress in 1916. She voted against U.S. entry into both World Wars, making her the only member of Congress to vote no to declaring war on Japan after the attack on Pearl Harbor. Rankin was a lifelong pacifist and advocate for women's rights, working for suffrage and serving as a lobbyist for international women's peace organizations after leaving Congress. She remained politically active into her 90s, leading anti-Vietnam War protests.
EDCT 203 ppt
This document provides an interactive presentation about the eight US Presidents who were from Ohio. It gives some brief background information about Ohio and each President. For each President, it lists their name, dates, and one or two interesting facts. It then has a short quiz to test knowledge of the Presidents. The overall purpose is to educate students about Ohio's contribution of eight US Presidents, nicknamed the "Mother of Presidents."
Criminal Rights Court Cases
The document summarizes important Supreme Court Chief Justices and key decisions from the Marshall, Warren, and Burger Courts. It focuses on the Warren Court's expansion of criminal rights and civil liberties cases in the 1960s, including Gideon v. Wainwright, Escobedo v. Illinois, Mapp v. Ohio, and Miranda v. Arizona, the latter of which established that police must inform suspects of their right to remain silent and right to an attorney upon arrest. The document also briefly discusses the Korematsu, Roe v. Wade, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey decisions regarding civil rights and privacy issues.
Thurgood marshall
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer and civil rights activist who served as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court from 1967 to 1991. He was born in 1908 in Baltimore, Maryland and fought against unfair laws facing African Americans through his legal work, helping to end segregation and arguing pivotal civil rights cases like Brown v. Board of Education. Marshall believed strongly in justice, freedom of expression, and respect for authority under the law.
Fannie Lou Hamer
Fannie Lou Hamer was a civil rights activist who fought for racial equality and justice. She was born in Mississippi in 1917 and worked as a sharecropper until she was 45 years old. In 1962, she began attending voter registration workshops and helped register black voters, facing retaliation from white landowners. In 1964, she was severely beaten in jail after being arrested for attempting to register to vote. Despite threats and violence, Hamer continued her activism and helped form the Freedom Democratic Party to challenge the all-white Democratic delegation from Mississippi. She testified about her beating at the 1964 Democratic National Convention. Later, she worked to establish Freedom Farms cooperative to help families in need.
32nd and elmira
Three men have been preliminarily charged in connection with a shooting at a birthday party in Indianapolis on August 3rd, 2010 that left two people dead and eight victims total. Damion Martin, Antwan Williams, and Devin Staten have been charged with conspiracy to commit murder, attempt murder, and aggravated battery. All three men are being held without bond as the homicide investigation continues. Anyone with information is asked to contact authorities.
What's hot (10)
Viewers also liked
Chapter13
The juvenile justice system originated from the child-saving movement which argued the state has a responsibility to protect children. The first juvenile court was established in Illinois in 1899 and differed from adult courts by having no juries, different terminology, and focus on rehabilitation over punishment. A series of Supreme Court cases from 1966-1975 gave juveniles some due process rights like right to counsel. Today states set their own juvenile justice policies but the system focuses on rehabilitation for youth offenders.
Juvenile Law
The juvenile court system aims to rehabilitate young offenders rather than punish them. It handles two types of cases: neglect cases, where youth are abused by caregivers and the court can place them in foster homes, and delinquency cases, where a juvenile commits a crime. For non-violent offenders, the court may divert them into rehabilitation programs instead of formal proceedings. If tried, juveniles are not entitled to juries, their identities are kept secret, and they have rights like legal counsel to protect them. Successful completion of probation results in charges being dropped.
Values Matter Presentation by Rakesh Malhotra October 2011
This document discusses five global human values: health, happiness, peace, prosperity, and productivity & innovation. It notes that human values provide inherent energy, dynamism, and choices between good and bad options that can lead to either problems or adventure and achievement. The document also outlines several core human values and sub-values, and discusses the Hindu concept of purushartha - the four goals of human existence: dharma, artha, kama, and moksha. It emphasizes that behaviors are directed by mind and values.
Laser therapycentersofgreaterwashingtonbrochure
Patient information brochure on benefits of Avicenna High Power Laser Therapy.
2012 Michigan Road Scholar Orientation
The document provides an agenda and information for the 2012 Michigan Road Scholars Tour Orientation. The tour will take place from April 30 to May 4 and will expose participants to Michigan's economy, government, culture, education and social issues. Key stops include the State Capitol, Sault Ste. Marie, Traverse City, Grand Rapids, Benton Harbor, Detroit and discussions with leaders across sectors. Participants will learn about the state and communities that many University of Michigan students call home.
Interview question
This document contains questions from an interview about an educator's use of information and communication technology (ICT) for teaching visual arts and design. It asks about the educator's confidence and experience with various ICT skills, the types of digital materials used for teaching, how ICT is used to prepare lessons and provide feedback/assessment, and the perceived impact of ICT use on students and teaching. The educator is also asked to rate their level of agreement with several statements about how ICT should be used by students and its impact on student outcomes and teacher skills/presentation.
TeamSevak
This document proposes solutions to improve primary healthcare access in rural India. It discusses establishing mobile hospitals with basic medical facilities to increase accessibility and availability in remote villages. It also suggests developing affordable medical technologies like devices for non-invasive anemia and blood sugar detection. An Interactive Voice Response System is proposed to provide medical advice and disease management via telephone. Health awareness would be raised through village campaigns, pamphlets and utilizing ASHA workers. Policy recommendations include regulating medical devices, funding healthcare startups and establishing a rural telehealth program using mobile phones. The goal is to universalize quality primary healthcare access for rural India's population.
VENDER UNA MESA
Un vendedor publicó una foto de una mesa en venta en eBay sin darse cuenta de que también se veía su entrepierna en el espejo detrás. El mensaje advierte a otros vendedores que revisen cuidadosamente las fotos que publican en línea para evitar exponer partes privadas de su cuerpo sin darse cuenta.
Housekeepers
The presentation discusses housekeepers and their typical work, which includes cleaning bathrooms, rooms, kitchens, and doing laundry as well as taking care of children. While housekeepers can help by doing all the work, there are also disadvantages such as people becoming lazy, housekeepers potentially hitting children or stealing. New technologies may allow housewives to need housekeepers less. The presentation concludes with asking if there are any questions.
Socially Diverse #SocDiv #prsa_ic
Socially Diverse was created to highlight unique, interesting, diverse conversations online, both projects and the people who lead them.
Klickitat County Community Health Needs Assessment Data and Findings Septem...
The document summarizes findings from a community health needs assessment conducted in Klickitat County, Washington. It describes the data collection process, demographics of the county population, survey results on access to and satisfaction with healthcare, and top health issues. Key findings include the county population is older and growing older than the state average, over 80% of residents have a primary care provider but access is lower in East County, and over 70% of residents gave high ratings to their healthcare in the last year.
Workshops for Medical Professionals
NIRVAN has initiated workshops to train doctors in the following areas:
Effective Doctor-PatientRelationship.
Essential soft skills requirement in relationship focused profession. Medico –Marketing tools to build medical practice.
Introducing Allander Noble
Allander Noble is an executive recruitment and development firm founded in 1997 and based in Tunbridge Wells, Kent. They have a virtual structure with six fee-earners who complete approximately 50 assignments per year for clients throughout the UK. They provide executive search, succession planning, and other services at fee rates typically 20% below competitors. They guarantee placements for 6 months and have a 76% repeat business rate.
L6 Wind Energy
The document discusses wind energy and wind turbines. It begins by explaining how wind is formed from pressure gradients and the Coriolis effect. It then discusses different types of winds and how wind speed and patterns vary over time. Methods for measuring wind are presented, including wind atlases. The basics of how wind power is captured by wind turbines are covered, including swept area, power output formulas, and optimal turbine spacing in wind farms. Environmental impacts and public acceptance issues are also summarized.
Social media October 2014
This document discusses social media and people issues from the perspective of an HR consultancy. It covers definitions of key terms, popular forms of social media, how to frame social media efforts and develop strategies. It also addresses topics like the new recruitment process, talent pools, hiring interviews, background checks and disciplinary issues. The document provides guidance on writing social media policies and discusses legal cases. It aims to help organizations effectively manage social media and people issues.
Vangent
This document provides guidance on dealing with hostile customers. It begins with defining goals such as shortening interactions and reducing stress. It then discusses why customers may be angry and provides techniques for defusing hostility. These include acknowledging feelings, avoiding defensiveness, focusing on problem solving, and setting limits if needed. The document emphasizes active listening, providing choices, and making customers feel heard in order to resolve issues while reducing anger and stress.
Joe's Civics project
The document summarizes 6 significant rulings from the US Supreme Court. Case 1 was Miranda v Arizona in 1966, which established that suspects must be informed of their rights before being questioned. Case 2 was Brown v Board of Education in 1954, which ruled that public schools could not segregate students by race. Case 3 was Marbury v Madison in 1803, which established the principle of judicial review. Case 4 was Reed v Reed in 1971, which ruled that states could not discriminate based on sex. Case 5 was Gideon v Wainwright in 1963, which established the right to legal counsel. Case 6 was Escobido v Illinois in 1964, which extended Miranda rights to include access to an attorney during questioning.
Saving Struggling Quality Teams(2)
This document discusses strategies for saving struggling quality teams. It defines a quality team and identifies common reasons they may struggle, such as lack of clear objectives or interpersonal conflicts. The document emphasizes that conflict is inevitable but can be addressed constructively through training teams and facilitators in conflict resolution. It provides an example of a successful labor union that adopted a cooperative "consensus bargaining" approach to reduce conflicts compared to their previous adversarial approach.
Step by step guide to creating an email
This document provides a step-by-step guide for creating and sending an email. It explains how to start a new email in Outlook by clicking "new email" and selecting a contact. Details like the recipient's name should appear in the "to" field. An optional subject can be added below. The message is written and formatted in the body. Finally, the "send" button is pressed to deliver the email to the recipient.
Viewers also liked (20)
Values Matter Presentation by Rakesh Malhotra October 2011
Values Matter Presentation by Rakesh Malhotra October 2011
Klickitat County Community Health Needs Assessment Data and Findings Septem...
Klickitat County Community Health Needs Assessment Data and Findings Septem...
Similar to Gov pp revised2010
Miranda Rights-Word Document.
This document discusses the Miranda rights and their origin from the 1966 Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona. It provides details of the case, in which Ernest Miranda was questioned by police without being informed of his right to remain silent or have an attorney present. His confession was later ruled inadmissible. As a result, the Supreme Court ruled that suspects in custody must be read their Miranda rights, including the right to remain silent and have an attorney, before being questioned. The document outlines the typical Miranda warnings and explains that they are meant to protect 4th and 5th amendment rights and must be given before formal questioning begins if a suspect is in custody.
Miranda Rights.
Miranda warnings inform suspects of their constitutional rights when being questioned by police. They originated from the 1966 Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona, which ruled that suspects must be informed that they have the right to remain silent and request an attorney before and during questioning. The Miranda case involved Ernesto Miranda, who was arrested and confessed to kidnapping and rape without being informed of his rights. His confession was ruled inadmissible, establishing that suspects must be read their Miranda rights to protect against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment. Miranda warnings must be given when a suspect is in custody and subject to interrogation. They do not have to be given for basic identifying questions alone.
Miranda vs arizona presentation
Miranda v. Arizona established that the police must inform suspects of their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and their Sixth Amendment right to an attorney before questioning. Ernesto Miranda was interrogated by police for two hours without being informed of his rights and confessed to rape and kidnapping. His confession was allowed at trial, but the Supreme Court ultimately ruled 5-4 that his confession should have been excluded because he was not informed of his constitutional rights prior to questioning.
Xavier woodson civil liberties project
In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested by Phoenix police on suspicion of kidnapping and rape. He was interrogated for two hours without being informed of his right to remain silent or have an attorney present. Miranda confessed and was convicted solely based on this written confession. The Supreme Court later ruled Miranda's confession inadmissible because his constitutional rights were violated. This ruling established that suspects must be informed of their Miranda rights before custodial interrogation.
Presentationnew
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) established that the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of their freedom of action unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. Specifically, Miranda established that the defendant must be warned prior to any questioning that they have the right to remain silent, that anything they say can be used against them in a court of law, that they have the right to the presence of an attorney, and that if they cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for them prior to any questioning if they so desire.
College Business Law Presentation
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) established that the prosecution may not use statements obtained from defendants during custodial interrogation unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. Ernesto Miranda was interrogated by police for two hours without being informed of his right to remain silent and his right to an attorney. He confessed to rape and kidnapping charges. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that Miranda's confession could not be used against him at trial because he was not informed of his constitutional rights prior to questioning. The ruling required police to inform individuals of their Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights before questioning.
College Business Law Presentation
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) established that the prosecution may not use statements obtained from defendants during custodial interrogation unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. Ernesto Miranda was interrogated by police for two hours without being informed of his right to remain silent and his right to an attorney. He subsequently confessed and was convicted based primarily on his confession. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that Miranda's confession could not be used against him at trial because he had not been informed of his Fifth Amendment rights prior to questioning. This case required police to inform individuals in custody of their Miranda rights before interrogation.
Miranda arizona
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) established that the prosecution may not use statements obtained from defendants during custodial interrogation unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. Ernesto Miranda was interrogated by police for two hours without being informed of his right to remain silent and have an attorney present. His confession was used to convict him, but the Supreme Court ultimately ruled 5-4 that his confession should have been excluded from trial because his rights were not properly protected during questioning. The ruling established that the police must inform individuals in custody of their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and Sixth Amendment right to an attorney before interrogation.
Mirandavsarizona
Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1963 for kidnapping and raping an 18-year-old woman in Phoenix, Arizona. The main argument of the defense was that Miranda's confession should be inadmissible since the police did not read him his Miranda rights before questioning. These rights include the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present during questioning. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that the police are required to inform suspects of their Fifth Amendment rights prior to questioning.
Presentationnew
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) established important rights for criminal suspects during police interrogations. Ernesto Miranda was interrogated for two hours without being informed of his right against self-incrimination or his right to an attorney. He subsequently confessed and was convicted. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that Miranda's confession should have been excluded from trial because he was not informed of his constitutional rights during questioning. The ruling established that suspects must be informed of their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and Sixth Amendment right to an attorney before custodial interrogations.
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda was charged with rape and kidnapping and interrogated by police without being informed of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination or his Sixth Amendment right to an attorney. He subsequently confessed to the crimes. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Miranda, concluding that defendants arrested under state law must be informed of their constitutional rights against self-incrimination and to legal representation before interrogation while in police custody.
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda was charged with rape and kidnapping and interrogated by police without being informed of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination or his Sixth Amendment right to an attorney. He subsequently confessed to the crimes. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Miranda, concluding that defendants arrested under state law must be informed of their constitutional rights against self-incrimination and to legal representation before being interrogated in police custody.
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda was charged with rape and kidnapping and confessed during a police interrogation where he was not informed of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination or his Sixth Amendment right to an attorney. His attorney argued his confession should be excluded as it was obtained illegally without informing him of his rights. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Miranda, concluding defendants arrested under state law must be informed of their rights against self-incrimination and to legal representation before interrogation while in police custody.
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda was charged with rape and kidnapping and interrogated by police without being informed of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination or his Sixth Amendment right to an attorney. He subsequently confessed to the crimes. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Miranda, concluding that defendants arrested under state law must be informed of their constitutional rights against self-incrimination and to legal representation before interrogation while in police custody.
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v Arizona established that defendants must be informed of their 5th and 6th amendment rights against self-incrimination and to legal counsel before being interrogated by police while in custody. Miranda was interrogated without being informed of these rights and confessed, but his attorney argued the confession should be excluded as it was obtained illegally. The Supreme Court agreed in a 5-4 decision, ruling that Miranda's rights had been violated when he was not notified of his constitutional protections prior to questioning.
Miranda v arizona (1966)
In Miranda v Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the confession obtained from Ernesto Miranda without informing him of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and his Sixth Amendment right to an attorney should have been excluded from his trial for rape and kidnapping. Miranda had confessed to the crimes during a police interrogation where he was not made aware of his constitutional rights, leading the Court to conclude defendants in custody must be informed of these rights before interrogation.
Miranda v arizona (1966)
In Miranda v Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the confession obtained from Ernesto Miranda without informing him of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and his Sixth Amendment right to an attorney should have been excluded from his trial for rape and kidnapping. Miranda had confessed to the crimes during interrogation where police did not notify him of his constitutional rights, and his attorney argued this made his confession illegally obtained. The Supreme Court concluded defendants in police custody must be informed of these rights before interrogation.
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
As part of Grade 12 Canadian & International Law, I created a presentation that outlined the details and significance of the famous case of "Miranda vs. Arizona" (the case that is responsible for the right to remain silent, request an attorney etc).
case studey for english class.pdf
Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1963 in Phoenix for robbery. His confession during police interrogation was used to convict him. The Supreme Court later ruled this violated Miranda's Fifth Amendment rights. The Court established that suspects must be informed of their right to remain silent and have an attorney present before questioning. This established Miranda warnings that are now required to be given to suspected criminals before interrogation. While some felt this went too far, it has helped curb police coercion and protect suspects' constitutional rights during questioning. Miranda rights have become a staple of police procedure and important legal precedent regarding self-incrimination.
Plessy 1Plessy v. Ferguson and Miranda .docx
Plessy 1
Plessy v. Ferguson and Miranda v. Arizona
Name
Class
Date
Professor
Plessy v. Ferguson and Miranda v. Arizona
Two landmark rulings made by the Supreme Court involve the cases of Plessy v. Ferguson and Miranda v. Arizona. In both rulings the impact to society was great with one resulting in the segregation of African American citizen for the next fifty years while the other affected the way law enforcement officers’ question and interrogate criminal offenders. While both of these cases occurred in two different centuries the ruling of the court had a direct impact on functions in American society and the rights of the individual citizen. In Plessy the rights of the African American where limited but in the case of Miranda individual rights were broadened.
Plessy vs. Ferguson
In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson the case began when an African American male who was half white and appeared white went against a Louisiana law that requires separate accommodations for separate races. Homer Plessy was a member of a group in New Orleans known as the Citizens Committee that fought for the equal right of the African American citizen. The Citizens Committee decided to test a Louisiana Law known as the 1890 Louisiana Separate Car Act. When Homer Plessy entered the train and took accommodations in the white section of the railcars he was detained by a police officer and held in a separate car until he was arrested upon exiting the train. Plessy was charged with breaching Louisiana Law and was jailed and fined.
On appeal the Louisiana Appeals Court ruled declared forced segregation in railroad cars traveling between states to be unconstitutional (Wolf, 2011). The case was then appealed to the Louisiana Supreme Court that upheld the ruling of the district court and found the state had a right to establish laws that provide separate but equal accommodations. The case was then appealed for the last time when it went in front of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state and the laws concerning the segregation of the White and African American citizen was not addressed for over sixty years when the Supreme Courts ruling was reversed in the case of Brown vs. Board of Education.
When the Plessy case was brought in front of the Supreme Court by the defendant and the members of the Citizens Committee the claim was the defendant was denied his Fourteenth and Thirteenth Amendment rights. Plessy claimed that the 1890 Louisiana Separate Car Act violated his Thirteenth Amendment right against involuntary servitude. In other Plessy was claiming that by being forced into separate accommodations he was being placed in involuntary servitude. The court ruled that the Thirteenth Amendment did not apply to segregation so the defendants Thirteenth Amendment right could not have been violated.
Under the Fourteenth Amendment the defendant, Plessy, claimed he was denied the right to equal protection.
Similar to Gov pp revised2010 (20)
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
Gov pp revised2010
- 1. Ashley Clark Molly Pittman Chelsea Maldonado Coley Land Jesse Maness Mrs. Washington Government 4th period February 8, 2013
- 3. WHO? Miranda- Plaintiff Arizona- Defendant
- 4. WHAT? • Miranda was charges with rape, kidnapping, and robbery. • Arizona failed to read Ernesto Miranda his rights.
- 5. WHEN? Miranda was arrested on March 13, 1963, the court case was heard in 1966.
- 6. HOW? • Ernesto only had to serve 1/3 of his sentence of 20-30 years in prison. There were no other court cases involved.
- 8. WHY? • Miranda had a line of violence in his family, Arizona mistakenly failed to read Miranda his rights.
- 9. Outcome/opinions Outcome- Miranda won the case 5 to 4 and only had to serve 1/3 of his sentence in court. Opinions- As a group, we thought that Miranda deserved to serve more time according to the proof/evidence. However, on account of them not reading his rights, we feel that the punishment he received was enough.
- 10. Bibliography Miranda v. arizona. (n.d.). Retrieved from http:// www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/hi storics/USSC_CR_0384_0436_ZS.html McBride, A. (2006, December). Landmark cases- miranda v. arizona (1966). Retrieved from http ://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/ rights/landmark_miranda.html 45th anniversary of miranda rights brings the fifth amendment into your life. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.uscourts.gov/EducationalResources/ClassroomActi vities/FifthAmendment/mirandaVarizonaOverview.aspx