Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. ArizonaImaan Virani
As part of Grade 12 Canadian & International Law, I created a presentation that outlined the details and significance of the famous case of "Miranda vs. Arizona" (the case that is responsible for the right to remain silent, request an attorney etc).
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. ArizonaImaan Virani
As part of Grade 12 Canadian & International Law, I created a presentation that outlined the details and significance of the famous case of "Miranda vs. Arizona" (the case that is responsible for the right to remain silent, request an attorney etc).
The slide is about the famous law-book writer mr. john grisham..if any student wants a summary of this novel this is the best place....check it out....hope u njoy
The U.S. criminal justice system deals with the conflict of protectironnag9bkla
The U.S. criminal justice system deals with the conflict of protecting the rights of defendants and citizens. For example, Ernesto Miranda, a confessed rapist, robber, and kidnapper, was released by the Arizona criminal justice system because members of the system failed to notify Miranda of his constitutional rights (
Miranda v. Arizona
, 1966). By a five-to-four decision, the Supreme Court of the United States made a decision in favor of the defendant's rights against the rights of citizens to be protected from such criminals.
Do you agree with a defendant's case being completely dismissed if he or she is not provided Miranda rights? Why, or why not?
REPLY TO MY CLASSMATE RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE QUESTIONS AND EXPLAIN WHY YOU AGREE? (A MINIMUM OF 75 WORDS or MORE)
Yes, I agree that defendant's case should be completely dismissed if Miranda rights are violated. There are so many wrongfully convicted people in prison now as a result of coerced confessions. This often happens when detectives are desperate for a confession. Police interrogations should stop once a defendant ask for an attorney and invoke the right to remain silent. I believe a defendant should be acquitted on all charges once their Constitutional rights are violated egregiously.
...
The slide is about the famous law-book writer mr. john grisham..if any student wants a summary of this novel this is the best place....check it out....hope u njoy
The U.S. criminal justice system deals with the conflict of protectironnag9bkla
The U.S. criminal justice system deals with the conflict of protecting the rights of defendants and citizens. For example, Ernesto Miranda, a confessed rapist, robber, and kidnapper, was released by the Arizona criminal justice system because members of the system failed to notify Miranda of his constitutional rights (
Miranda v. Arizona
, 1966). By a five-to-four decision, the Supreme Court of the United States made a decision in favor of the defendant's rights against the rights of citizens to be protected from such criminals.
Do you agree with a defendant's case being completely dismissed if he or she is not provided Miranda rights? Why, or why not?
REPLY TO MY CLASSMATE RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE QUESTIONS AND EXPLAIN WHY YOU AGREE? (A MINIMUM OF 75 WORDS or MORE)
Yes, I agree that defendant's case should be completely dismissed if Miranda rights are violated. There are so many wrongfully convicted people in prison now as a result of coerced confessions. This often happens when detectives are desperate for a confession. Police interrogations should stop once a defendant ask for an attorney and invoke the right to remain silent. I believe a defendant should be acquitted on all charges once their Constitutional rights are violated egregiously.
...
2. THE CASE In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona for armed robbery,and for kidnapping and raping a slightly retarded 18-year-old woman. He already had a record for armed robbery, and juvenile record including attempted rape, assault , and burglary.
3. The argument of the prosecution was about Ernesto Miranda kidnapping and raping a slightly retarded 18-year-old woman.(Rebecca Ann Johnson) The problem argued was that the officers did not read him his rights. To read the rights of the accused The Prosecution
4. THE DEFENSE The main argument of the defense was that they did not read him his rights. He wasn’t aware of his right’s, Now it’s the law to read the rights of the accused.
5. The Miranda rights: You have the right to remain silent Anything you say can be used against you in the court of law. You have the right to the presence of an attorney to assist you prior to questioning, and to be with you during questioning. If you so desire. if you cannot afford an attorney you have the right to have an attorney appointed for you prior to questioning. Do you understand these rights? Will you voluntarily answer my questioning?
6. They sent Ernesto Miranda to prison for 11 years for the rapping of Rebecca Ann Johnson. It’s now a law that the police have to read the rights of the accused. THE VERDICT
