Downloaded 12 times
More Related Content
Similar to Goat meat america's hottest commodity
Goat meat america's hottest commodity
- 1. Goat Meat: America’sHottest Commodity Dr. Frank Pinkerton AKGA Annual Meeting, June 2010 Batesville, MS
- 2. We are shortof goat meat, really! • In 2009 we harvested over 800,000 goats in federal and state inspected plants • We estimate an additional 100,000 goats were killed, but unreported (informal slaughter) • We also imported over 700,000 goat carcasses from Australia in various forms • On 1 January, 2010 we had just over 3,000,000 goats (about 2,600,000 meat goats)
- 3. Goat meat marketing •The aggregate demand for goat meat is currently unknown • We do not how much would be taken if ‘sufficient’ supplies were available across time • In economic parlance, goat meat prices are supply-driven, not demand-driven (beware the ‘glass ceiling’ effect on consumer demand)
- 4. Estimating demand forgoat meat • Research is underway at LSU to determine the aggregate demand for goat meat • The project will investigate seasonality of demand and consumer preferences across groups and venues • There will additional investigations on preferred carcass characteristics and value- added products (cite producer participation)
- 5. Future demand forgoat meat • An ‘ethnic’ is one whose folks got here after your folks got here; many have strong preferences for goat meat; more ethnics, more goat sales • Ethnic numbers and family incomes are trending upward; distribution is ‘spreading’ • Non-ethnic consumption of goat meat is also increasing, but at a much slower rate
- 6. Opportunities for increasingthe domestic supply of goat meat 1. Expand the number of farms producing goats 2. Expand the number of goats on existing farms and ranches 3. Expand the off-take/farm by increasing reproductive efficiency (more kids born, better survival rates)
- 7. Continuation 4. Increase theaverage selling weight of slaughter kids via management fiat, through improved genetic quality and possibly by better nutrition 5. Increase percent of boneless yield/carcass via genetic selection (improved meat-to-bone ratio and, possibly, improved dressing percent)
- 8. continuation 6. Generate moredoelings from a herd via AI by using ‘modified’ semen. A commercial semen processing company, SexingTechnologies.com at Navasota, TX has apparently modified goat semen which PVAMU is using to obtain an atypically high ratio of female-to-male offspring; results are pending, but promising (97:3 for dairy heifers)
- 9. Constraints to increasingthe supply of domestic goat meat • Options 1 and 2 (more goat farms, more goats per farms) require reallocation of resources • Adaption rates would be dependent on the expected cost-benefit ratios to be realized • To make cost-benefit estimates, one can readily find information on selling prices (as influenced by season, weight, and grade), but
- 10. Cost-benefit analysis (continued) •There is a near total absence of reliable information about the real costs of market kid production in various geographical venues • University researchers have been notoriously reluctant to undertake such economic studies • As a consequence, University extension specialists are better at offering technical recommendations than economic assessments
- 11. Budget formats forestimating cost- benefit ratios • Most Universities have ‘how to do a budget’ info for livestock enterprises; some have computerized versions. The logistics and the calculations are relatively simple • The difficulty is finding accurate cost input data (what? how much? cost/unit?). • Even experienced goat farmers are not much better ‘advisors’, largely because they don’t know how much it costs them to raise a kid
- 12. Options 3, 4,5 necessitate: • Producers to combine improved management practices; more specifically, improvement in the genetic quality of their herd is crucial • Producers can ‘do something’ about nutrition, health, and facilities, etc., but… • Improving genetic worth is much more difficult and certainly slower • How does one improve genetic worth?
- 13. Selection of breedingstock • Visually evaluating the ‘breeding value’ of a goat is somewhat akin to assessing pornography for content (with experience, it may be doable, but it is pure hell to describe) • I can usually beat a gate-cut (by looking at structure, conformation, and udder and mouth soundness), but truthfully, not by much
- 14. Selection, continued • Thefact is that neither I, nor you, can really ‘see’ certain crucial traits affecting performance (longevity, fertility, mothering ability, milk yield, DFI and FCE (ADG) • This being the case, the correlation between ‘phenotypic appearance’ and genotype-driven performance is neither high nor reliable
- 15. Selection, continued • On-farmperformance testing is the best way to make rapid improvement in genetic value • You can do this by weighing kids at near 90 days of age and recording this information by dam and by sire, with necessary ‘adjustments’ • KSU-Frankfort will do these computations for you, for free, and send you a sire and dam summary ranking their performance
- 16. Option 4: Increasingcarcass size • This is the fastest way to increase goat meat supply, but there are constraints • Larger slaughter goats have poorer FCE and thus larger feed cost/lb of gain • Larger goats reduce by some measure the number of does/farm and thus fewer kids • Larger goats have more internal fat and somewhat lower dressing percent (waste)
- 17. Major constraint toadding carcass wt • Culturally-induced consumer resistance to changes from traditional preferences • preferred carcass weights 20-30 lb • discrimination against excessive fat • aversion to fabricated cuts (rear leg, shoulder, back-strip, etc.) • limited interest in ground meat and ‘sausage’
- 18. Positive aspects oflarger carcasses • Reduced processing costs/lb • Creation of larger primal cuts for sale as chops & roasts; more ‘trim’ for sausage products • But, the current preference is for smaller carcasses or, with increasing retail prices, for halves and quarters • Larger, aged, or lower quality carcasses are ‘cubed’ for sale, and also for cookery
- 19. Paramount constraint tomore goats • Insufficient rates of return to capital, management, and labor • The major reason for the poor rate of return is not supplemental feed or health costs, or, until recently, low live-goat prices, but rather the • high cost of land needed to provide forage • The cost of land is increasingly divorced from its agricultural productivity (has been, will be)
- 20. Continued • The costof land to provide a forage-based ‘home’ for a doe can rarely, if ever, be recovered from the sale of her offspring • Indeed, it is increasingly difficult to recover interest cost (and taxes) • To illustrate, land costing $3,000/acre and able to support 3 does ‘year-round’ results in an ‘opportunity cost’ of $135/acre/year (3,000 x 4.5% tax-free bond) or $45/doe/year (135/3)
- 21. continued • Adding $55/doefor all other costs results in an annual doe maintenance cost of $100 • If she sells weans/sell 100 lb of kids/year, the break-even price/lb of kid would be $1.00 • If the selling price (after commission) were $1.60/lb, the doe earns a $60 profit • Is this good, or bad? Comments
- 22. How to copewith high land cost? • If you own the land, ignore ‘opportunity cost’ • If your are buying the land, charge only the interest and taxes to the goat enterprise • Consider the cost of the land as a real estate investment; make the capital payments from off-farm income and wait for land price appreciation to make you astute—and profitable
- 23. Conclusion • Livestock farmingis that way-of-live wherein wistful hope triumphs over perceived reality, every spring, every year • The sight and smell of green grass routinely clouds the agrarian mind • It has been thus since the beginning of time • Arribe y adelante, mis amigos… gracias por sus tiempo, vaya con Dios, y adios ahora… se dice el vieho hombre caprino