This document is a case study essay submitted by Thuan Nguyen Quang that received an overall grade of 25/30. The 2,489 word essay received feedback from instructors on various pages noting things like "good work", "decent citing", and "shows understanding". It also includes a rubric evaluating the essay on elements like introduction, theory-based analysis, evidence-based analysis, recommendations, clarity, and supporting materials.

1. G1-S3446621-Case Study
Essay
by Thuan Nguyen Quang
FILE
TIME SUBMITTED 06-AUG-2015 06:53PM
SUBMISSION ID 559405165
WORD COUNT 2489
CHARACTER COUNT 15454
G1_S3446621_CASESTUDYESSAY.DOCX (167.45K)

14. QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
FINAL GRADE
25/30
G1-S3446621-Case Study Essay
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
good work
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
This is OK
This is OK
This is OK
This is OK
PAGE 4
Good start
Decent citing
Decent citing
PAGE 5
This is OK
This is OK
Shows understanding
This is OK
This is OK
PAGE 6

15. QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
Citation not referenced
Shows reading
PAGE 7
Shows understanding
This is OK
This is OK
PAGE 8
Shows understanding
Shows reading
Very nice
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
PAGE 11
PAGE 12

16. RUBRIC: S2-15 OB CASE STUDY LIT REVIEW
INTRODUCTION (10%)
NN +
(7.50)
NN++
(13.50)
PA+
(15.90)
PA++
(17.10)
CR+
(18.90)
CR++
(20.10)
DI+
(21.90)
DI++
(23.10)
HD+
(25.50)
HD++
(30)
THEORY BASED (30%)
NN +
(7.50)
NN++
(13.50)
PA+
(15.90)
PA++
(17.10)
CR+
(18.90)
CR++
(20.10)
DI+
24.54 / 30
23.10 / 30
Did not demonstrate adequate consideration of context and purpose and a clear
f ocus on the essay questions
Did not demonstrate adequate consideration of context and purpose and a clear
f ocus on the essay questions
Demonstrates some consideration of context and purpose and attempts to f ocus
on the essay questions
Demonstrates some consideration of context and purpose and attempts to f ocus
on the essay questions
Demonstrates adequate consideration of context and purpose and a clear f ocus
on the essay questions
Demonstrates adequate consideration of context and purpose and a clear f ocus
on the essay questions
Demonstrates a good understanding of context and purpose and f ully aligns with
the essay questions
Demonstrates a good understanding of context and purpose and f ully aligns with
the essay questions
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of context and purpose that is
responsive to the research questions
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of context and purpose that is
responsive to the research questions
23.10 / 30
Theory based Analysis
Relevant key OB theories and f rameworks are poorly discussed and little or no link
made to issues/problems in the case study.
Relevant key OB theories and f rameworks are poorly discussed and little or no link
made to issues/problems in the case study.
Some relevant key OB theories and f rameworks are discussed and attempt made
to linked appropriately to issues/problems in the case study.
Some relevant key OB theories and f rameworks are discussed and attempt made
to linked appropriately to issues/problems in the case study.
Relevant key relevant OB theories and f rameworks are discussed and linked made
appropriately to issues/problems in the case study.
Relevant key relevant OB theories and f rameworks are discussed and linked made
appropriately to issues/problems in the case study.
Relevant key OB theories and f rameworks are discussed and linked made to the

17. (21.90)
DI++
(23.10)
HD+
(25.50)
HD++
(30)
EVIDENCE BASE (20%)
NN +
(7.50)
NN++
(13.50)
PA+
(15.90)
PA++
(17.10)
CR+
(18.90)
CR++
(20.10)
DI+
(21.90)
DI++
(23.10)
HD+
(25.50)
HD++
(30)
RECOMMEND (10%)
NN +
(7.50)
NN++
(13.50)
issues/problems in the case study with some evidence of critical evaluation and
clarity.
Relevant key OB theories and f rameworks are discussed and linked made to the
issues/problems in the case study with some evidence of critical evaluation and
clarity.
Relevant key OB theories and f rameworks are discussed and linked made to the
issues/problems in the case study with exceptional critical evaluation and clarity.
Relevant key OB theories and f rameworks are discussed and linked made to the
issues/problems in the case study with exceptional critical evaluation and clarity.
25.50 / 30
Evidence based Analysis
The analysis was not coherent and based on irrelevant evidence and practice.
The analysis was not coherent and based on irrelevant evidence and practice.
An attempt at a coherent analysis was based on partial use of relevant evidence
and practice.
An attempt at a coherent analysis was based on partial use of relevant evidence
and practice.
A coherent analysis was based on thorough use of some relevant evidence and
practice.
A coherent analysis was based on thorough use of some relevant evidence and
practice.
A coherent and comprehensive analysis was based on thorough use of the most
relevant evidence and practice.
A coherent and comprehensive analysis was based on thorough use of the most
relevant evidence and practice.
A coherent and complete analysis was based on complete use of all relevant
evidence, concepts and practice.
A coherent and complete analysis was based on complete use of all relevant
evidence, concepts and practice.
25.50 / 30
Recommendations and Conclusions
Stated general conclusions and recommendations which were not f ully supported
by the analysis and development.
Stated general conclusions and recommendations which were not f ully supported
by the analysis and development.

18. PA+
(15.90)
PA++
(17.10)
CR+
(18.90)
CR++
(20.10)
DI+
(21.90)
DI++
(23.10)
HD+
(25.50)
HD++
(30)
CLARITY (15%)
NN +
(7.50)
NN++
(13.50)
PA+
(15.90)
PA++
(17.10)
CR+
(18.90)
CR++
(20.10)
DI+
(21.90)
Drew limited conclusions and recommendations which f ollowed logically f rom the
analysis and development of explicit elements in the topic.
Drew limited conclusions and recommendations which f ollowed logically f rom the
analysis and development of explicit elements in the topic.
Drew conclusions and recommendations which f ollowed logically f rom the analysis
and development of explicit elements in the topic.
Drew conclusions and recommendations which f ollowed logically f rom the analysis
and development of explicit elements in the topic.
Drew a good set of conclusions and recommendations which f ollowed logically
f rom the analysis and development of all explicit and some implicit elements
evident in the topic.
Drew a good set of conclusions and recommendations which f ollowed logically
f rom the analysis and development of all explicit and some implicit elements
evident in the topic.
Drew an excellent set of conclusions and recommendations which f ollowed
logically f rom the analysis and development of both explicit and implicit elements
evident in the topic.
Drew an excellent set of conclusions and recommendations which f ollowed
logically f rom the analysis and development of both explicit and implicit elements
evident in the topic.
25.50 / 30
Clarity of writing and expression
Ideas and points dif f icult to comprehend. Paragraphs and sentences were poorly
constructed and illogical. Writing was f raught with clichés and misuse of language.
Ideas and points dif f icult to comprehend. Paragraphs and sentences were poorly
constructed and illogical. Writing was f raught with clichés and misuse of language.
Signif icant problems with clarity, coherence, and/or consistency. Paragraphs were
poorly organised or unf ocused. More than an occasional problem with sentence
construction, poor word choice, or over reliance on clichés.
Signif icant problems with clarity, coherence, and/or consistency. Paragraphs were
poorly organised or unf ocused. More than an occasional problem with sentence
construction, poor word choice, or over reliance on clichés.
Most ideas were clearly expressed, though with some need f or improvement.
Paragraphs generally coherent, but some were poorly organized or f ocused. Some
problems with sentence construction and/or word choice.
Most ideas were clearly expressed, though with some need f or improvement.
Paragraphs generally coherent, but some were poorly organized or f ocused. Some
problems with sentence construction and/or word choice.
Ideas were generally clearly expressed, perhaps with an occasional lapse in clarity.
Paragraphs were generally coherent, sentences mostly well-craf ted and varied,

19. DI++
(23.10)
HD+
(25.50)
HD++
(30)
SUPPORTING (15%)
NN +
(7.50)
NN++
(13.50)
PA+
(15.90)
PA++
(17.10)
CR+
(18.90)
CR++
(20.10)
DI+
(21.90)
DI++
(23.10)
HD+
(25.50)
HD++
(30)
and words well-chosen, though perhaps with a couple problems.
Ideas were generally clearly expressed, perhaps with an occasional lapse in clarity.
Paragraphs were generally coherent, sentences mostly well-craf ted and varied,
and words well-chosen, though perhaps with a couple problems.
Clear, logical, creative expression and well craf ted sentences. Paragraphing was
coherent and consistent with the ideas being presented. Demonstrated a creative
and accurate use of language and phrasing.
Clear, logical, creative expression and well craf ted sentences. Paragraphing was
coherent and consistent with the ideas being presented. Demonstrated a creative
and accurate use of language and phrasing.
25.50 / 30
Supporting materials and ref erencing
The analysis was based very limited sources and did not adopted Harvard
ref erencing style. Less than 10 journal articles
The analysis was based very limited sources and did not adopted Harvard
ref erencing style. Less than 10 journal articles
The analysis was gathered f rom several, relevant source(s) beyond those
provided and requested; and adopted Harvard ref erencing style appropriately (but
not consistently with some errors). Mimimum 10 journal articles
The analysis was gathered f rom several, relevant source(s) beyond those
provided and requested; and adopted Harvard ref erencing style appropriately (but
not consistently with some errors). Mimimum 10 journal articles
The analysis was gathered f rom several, relevant source(s) beyond those
provided and requested; and adopted Harvard ref erencing style appropriately,
accurately and consistently. Minimum 12 journal articles
The analysis was gathered f rom several, relevant source(s) beyond those
provided and requested; and adopted Harvard ref erencing style appropriately,
accurately and consistently. Minimum 12 journal articles
The analysis was gathered f rom many diverse, high quality source(s) beyond
those provided and requested; and adopted Harvard ref erencing style
appropriately, accurately and consistently. Minimum 14 journal articles
The analysis was gathered f rom many diverse, high quality source(s) beyond
those provided and requested; and adopted Harvard ref erencing style
appropriately, accurately and consistently. Minimum 14 journal articles
The inf ormation analysed was gathered f rom many diverse, high quality source(s)
beyond those provided and adopted; and adopted Harvard ref erencing style
appropriately, accurately and consistently. Minimum 16 journal articles
The inf ormation analysed was gathered f rom many diverse, high quality source(s)
beyond those provided and adopted; and adopted Harvard ref erencing style
appropriately, accurately and consistently. Minimum 16 journal articles