Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Imperialism, Colonialism and Racialisation
Similar to Imperialism, Colonialism and Racialisation (20)
More from MalikPinckney86
More from MalikPinckney86 (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Imperialism, Colonialism and Racialisation
- 1. Imperialism, Colonialism and Racialisation anonymous marking enabled Submission date: 15-Apr-2020 09:27PM (UTC+0100) Submission ID: 124210341 File name: Imperialism_colonialism_and_racialisation.docx (24.58K) Word count: 2100 Character count: 11209 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
- 2. good 8 FINAL GRADE 80/100 Imperialism, Colonialism and Racialisation GRADEMARK REPORT GENERAL COMMENTS Instructor It is clear that a great deal of work has gone into this essay. It is well researched and exceptionally well- written. You do a good job of connecting together your three chosen concepts, and your theorization of 'waste' places and populations is interesting and imaginative (there's quite a lot of contemporary work that deals with the intersection of race and waste - see the article I have linked to in the text for an example). A very strong engagement with key module themes. Well done. PAGE 1 Comment 1
- 3. A nice, clear introduction. Comment 2 clearly put, and backed up with a quotation. Good. Comment 3 Good PAGE 2 Comment 4 Again, a very clearly written summary. PAGE 3 Comment 5 Good QM Good Comment 6 A useful definition. Good. Comment 7 Hmm. Well it depends what we're counting as race. Anti-
- 4. essentialist approaches do not deny the existence of genetic differences between human beings. What we contest is their extrapolation into racial categories. PAGE 4 good good Comment 8 Great connection. There is much more that can be said about the intersection between race and waste. This, for example. PAGE 5 PAGE 6 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/anti.12501?cas a_token=N6PRZplfVboAAAAA%3Ab1J3u_PwsGea5F54xcnxh4 rJ698zu9gktbrQ3tbUqNWY1Ow6RihFvwKfLdQv65O3z5C-0p- nIzIEqA RUBRIC: SOCIOLOGY ESSAY RUBRIC IDEAS (20%) / (100) FIRST
- 6. / (100) FIRST 75 / 100 75 / 100 Engagement with key ideas and concepts Cannot be improved upon. Demonstrates excellent critical engagement with and focus on the question, drawing on relevant ideas and concepts. Demonstrates good critical engagement with and focus on the question, drawing on relevant ideas and concepts. Demonstrates reasonable engagement with and focus on the question, drawing on some relevant ideas and concepts. Does not sufficiently engage with or focus on the question or draw on relevant ideas and concepts. Insufficient engagement with and focus on the question and with relevant ideas and concepts. 75 / 100 Use of sociological and theoretical material
- 7. Cannot be improved upon. Uses extensive range of appropriate sociological/theoretical sources and employs these persuasively to develop and support the points made. Uses wide range of appropriate sociological/theoretical sources and employs these persuasively to develop and support the points made. Uses some appropriate sociological/theoretical sources and employs these competently to develop and support the points made. Little relevant reading and use of appropriate sources. Points made are not supported with relevant material. Little to no relevant reading and appropriate sources. Points made are not supported with relevant material. 75 / 100 Depth of analysis and critical evaluation Cannot be improved upon. Demonstrates insightful, nuanced grasp of material, with ability to identify and critically (75)
- 9. FIRST (75) 2:1 (65) 2:2 (55) 3RD (45) evaluate different theoretical positions. Demonstrates solid grasp of material, with ability to identify and critically evaluate different theoretical positions. Demonstrates good grasp of material, with ability to identify and describe different theoretical positions. Demonstrates some grasp of material, with some ability to identify different theoretical positions. Insufficient grasp of material; purely descriptive writing with no relevance to academic debates. 75 / 100 Clarity of argument Cannot be improved upon.
- 10. Argument is persuasive, and presented clearly and logically, with appropriate evidence provided. Argument is persuasive and mostly presented clearly and logically, with appropriate evidence provided Argument is weak and/or is unclear, with appropriate evidence not always provided. Argument is not supported with sufficient evidence and/or is unclear. Argument is not discernible. 75 / 100 Cannot be improved upon. Structure is clear; writing demonstrates excellent flow and signposting (e.g. introduction outlines structure of essay). Structure is clear; writing demonstrates good flow and signposting (e.g. introduction outlines structure of essay). Structure is reasonably clear; writing is mostly coherent and uses some signposting. Structure is unclear and writing does not flow or use signposting.
- 11. FAIL (35) WRITING (20%) / (100) FIRST (75) 2:1 (65) 2:2 (55) 3RD (45) FAIL (35) Structure is not discernible and writing does not flow or use signposting. 75 / 100 Writing (grammar, punctuation) and referencing Cannot be improved upon. No or virtually no errors of grammar or punctuation; sentence structure is excellent, and referencing and bibliography are completely accurate. Quotes
- 12. and paraphrased material are well incorporated into the text. Few errors of grammar or punctuation; sentence structure is very good, and referencing and bibliography are mostly accurate. Quotes and paraphrased material are mostly well incorporated into the text. Some errors of grammar or punctuation; sentence structure is sometimes incorrect, and referencing and bibliography are not accurate. Quotes and paraphrased material are not always well incorporated into the text. Consistent errors of grammar or punctuation, and referencing and bibliography are not accurate. Quotes and paraphrased material are not well incorporated into the text. Consistent errors of grammar or punctuation, and referencing and bibliography are not accurate. If plagiarised material is in evidence, this will be reported to the Student Regulations Team. Imperialism, Colonialism and Racialisationanonymous marking enabledImperialism, Colonialism and RacialisationGRADEMARK REPORTFINAL GRADEGENERAL COMMENTSInstructorRUBRIC: SOCIOLOGY ESSAY RUBRIC 75 / 100 14
- 13. • The ability to draw on relevant secondary sources. • The ability to draw on relevant examples to illustrate theories and concepts. • The clarity with which ideas are expressed and the ability to use good written English. • The use of appropriate academic conventions including references and bibliography. Assessment 2: Essay Weighting: 70% Length: 2000 words (excluding bibliography) Due date: Wednesday 21 April at 1pm Return date: Wednesday 12 May at 1pm Description and guidelines Your second assessment comprises a slightly longer essay. In this essay you will engage with three of the key concepts you have studied on this module. You should pick three of the following • antiracism • colonialism
- 14. • diaspora • ethnicity • ethnocentrism • hybridity • imperialism • intersectionality • Islamophobia • nationalism • new ethnicities • othering • racialization • whiteness Your essay should make use of your three chosen concepts in the context of a single, coherent piece of writing. You need to choose which three concepts interest you, and select a relevant example or examples to explain and unpack them. Though your essay will be focused on three of these concepts, there are connections to be made across the entire module, and where appropriate your essay should aim to make these connections.
- 15. You should avoid dealing sequentially with one concept after another, but instead try to explore their interrelationships by making connections between them. The best preparation for the essay is to complete all the weekly learning materials (including the required reading) and to attend all the live sessions. You will also be expected to have read around the subject more widely. You should never quote from lecture material or this module handbook. It is always more impressive if you can draw on different examples from those covered in class. ‘Theory’ is very important to this module, and you will be assessed on your ability to engage clearly and accurately with theoretical ideas. These should be illustrated and explored by drawing on relevant examples. Nayef T Alkhalifa 15 Notes:
- 16. • Essays must be submitted online via Blackboard. For details on how to submit your essay, see page 16. • Word count does not include the bibliography. There is a 10% leeway, but work significantly below or above this limit will be penalized. Assessment criteria: In marking the second assessment, tutors will consider: • The ability to summarise and evaluate relevant theories and concepts in some detail. • The ability to situate these theories and concepts in their historical, social and cultural contexts. • The ability to draw on relevant secondary sources, to include some independent research. • The ability to draw on relevant examples to illustrate theories and concepts. • The identification of how academic debates can critically inform discussion of race in popular, media, or political debate.
- 17. • The clarity with which ideas are expressed and the ability to use good written English. • The use of appropriate academic conventions including references and bibliography. Nayef T Alkhalifa