Requirements for Sociology4 chapters of the sociology book wil.docx
15017207 MAN4154M
1. 15017207 MAN4154M
by LISI HUANG
FILE
TIME SUBMITTED 10-DEC-2015 03:09PM
SUBMISSION ID 50170792
WORD COUNT 5027
CHARACTER COUNT 30705
15017207_MAN4154M.PDF (6.95M)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49. FINAL GRADE
80/0
15017207 MAN4154M
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
Grade: 80
Please see the marking grid (attached) which
gives f ull details of the how you have met each
of the criteria.
The report should be written in third person.
Conclusions could have been sharper.
Overall, the report is comprehensive and to some
extent accurately covers the area. Good attempt
at critical, balanced and well-inf ormed evaluation.
Throughout the text there is clarity of argument
and expression.
AC
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
PAGE 11
PAGE 12
PAGE 13
PAGE 14
52. RUBRIC: SOM MBA/MSC LEVEL 7 RUBRIC
THEORY
20-34 SIGNIFICANT
FAILURE
35-39 MARGINAL
FAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59
SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100
OUTSTANDING
CONTENT
20-34 SIGNIFICANT
FAILURE
35-39 MARGINAL
FAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59
SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100
OUTSTANDING
SCHOLARSHIP
70-84
Excellent
Understanding theory and practice
Failure to demonstrate systematic understanding of topic/area and its relevance to
practice
Failure to demonstrate systematic understanding of topic/area and its relevance to
practice
Demonstrates (basic/satisf actory) understanding of topic/area and its relevance
to practice, in a coherent manner.
Demonstrates (basic/satisf actory) understanding of topic/area and its relevance
to practice, in a coherent manner.
Good understanding of topic/area and its relevance to practice consistently
demonstrated in a logical, coherent manner.
Excellent co-ordinated, grounded and reasoned understanding of the topic and its
relevance to practice.
Excellent co-ordinated, grounded and reasoned understanding of the topic and its
relevance to practice.
70-84
Excellent
Content/Theory/Models/Framework
Inaccurate/inappropriate content/theory/models/f rameworks and techniques.
Inaccurate/inappropriate content/theory/models/f rameworks and techniques.
Appropriate selection of content/theory/models/f rameworks and techniques but
some aspects may be missing.
Appropriate selection of content/theory/models/f rameworks and techniques but
some aspects may be missing.
Insightf ul and appropriate selection of content/theory/models/f rameworks and
techniques.
Innovation selection and use of content/theory/modules/f rameworks and
techniques.
Innovation selection and use of content/theory/modules/f rameworks and
techniques.
70-84
Excellent
53. 20-34 SIGNIFICANT
FAILURE
35-39 MARGINAL
FAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59
SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100
OUTSTANDING
EVALUATION
20-34 SIGNIFICANT
FAILURE
35-39 MARGINAL
FAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59
SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100
OUTSTANDING
COMPLEXITY
20-34 SIGNIFICANT
FAILURE
35-39 MARGINAL
Reading, Scholarship
Little evidence of reading around the subject ore use of theory/literature to
support the narrative/discussion.
Little evidence of reading around the subject ore use of theory/literature to
support the narrative/discussion.
Limited but relevant reading around the subject. Basic/satisf actory use of theory
and literature to support narrative/discussion.
Limited but relevant reading around the subject. Basic/satisf actory use of theory
and literature to support narrative/discussion.
Good ability to critically appraise relevant theory and literature f rom variety of
sources, developing own ideas in the process.
Excellent/outstanding use of wide range of relevant sources of theories and
literature to justif y own ideas.
Excellent/outstanding use of wide range of relevant sources of theories and
literature to justif y own ideas.
70-84
Excellent
Evaluation, Analysis
Failure to integrate and evaluate data/literature/current research
Failure to integrate and evaluate data/literature/current research
Some evaluation/analysis of data/literature/current research, reasonably integrated
with narrative.
Some evaluation/analysis of data/literature/current research, reasonably integrated
with narrative.
Good clear evidence of evaluation/analysis of data/literature/current research,
integrated well with narrative.
Rigorous evaluation/analysis, comprehensively integrated with the narrative.
Rigorous evaluation/analysis, comprehensively integrated with the narrative.
70-84
Excellent
Critical thought/ Complexity
Failure to apply critical thought to evidence and/ore analysis of data/theory to deal
with complex issues.
Failure to apply critical thought to evidence and/ore analysis of data/theory to deal
54. FAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59
SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100
OUTSTANDING
CONCLUSIONS
20-34 SIGNIFICANT
FAILURE
35-39 MARGINAL
FAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59
SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100
OUTSTANDING
WRITTEN EXP
20-34 SIGNIFICANT
FAILURE
35-39 MARGINAL
FAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59
with complex issues.
Basic/satisf actory attempt at critically reviewing evidence and/or analysis of
data/theory within context.
Basic/satisf actory attempt at critically reviewing evidence and/or analysis of
data/theory within context.
Good critical review of evidence and/or analysis of data/theory and its application.
Excellent/outstanding use of critical analysis and its use to support the
development of written argument and development and original insights.
Excellent/outstanding use of critical analysis and its use to support the
development of written argument and development and original insights.
70-84
Excellent
Conclusions/Originality
Unsubstantiated conclusions based on anecdotes and generalisations. General
absence of originality
Unsubstantiated conclusions based on anecdotes and generalisations. General
absence of originality
Findings and conclusions grounded in theory/literature but limited. Some evidence
or originality developing.
Findings and conclusions grounded in theory/literature but limited. Some evidence
or originality developing.
Good summary of arguments based on theory/literature and its beginnings of
synthesis. Clear evidence of originality.
Analytical and clear conclusions well grounded in theory and literature, showing
development of original concepts.
Analytical and clear conclusions well grounded in theory and literature, showing
development of original concepts.
70-84
Excellent
Written Expression
Purpose and meaning unclear. Language, grammar and spelling poor.
Purpose and meaning unclear. Language, grammar and spelling poor.
Language mainly f luent. Some minor grammatical and spelling errors. Overall
meaning clear.
Language mainly f luent. Some minor grammatical and spelling errors. Overall
55. SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100
OUTSTANDING
STRUCTURE
20-34 SIGNIFICANT
FAILURE
35-39 MARGINAL
FAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59
SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100
OUTSTANDING
REFERENCING
20-34 SIGNIFICANT
FAILURE
35-39 MARGINAL
FAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59
SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100
OUTSTANDING
meaning clear.
Thoughts and ideas clearly expressed. Grammar and spelling accurate and
language f luent. Good f low to narrative.
Clarity of expression excellent/outstanding. Accurate use of grammar and spelling
with f luent prof essional/academic writing style.
Clarity of expression excellent/outstanding. Accurate use of grammar and spelling
with f luent prof essional/academic writing style.
70-84
Excellent
Structure/Presentation
Structure unclear, does not support narrative. Presentation not appropriate f or
audience.
Structure unclear, does not support narrative. Presentation not appropriate f or
audience.
Coherent structure, guides reader. Presentation appropriate f or audience intended.
Coherent structure, guides reader. Presentation appropriate f or audience intended.
Structure supports argument clearly. Presentation clear and appropriate.
Structure guides reader through argument. Presentation outstanding.
Structure guides reader through argument. Presentation outstanding.
70-84
Excellent
Ref erencing
Ref erencing absent, unclear, irrelevant and/ore inaccurate.
Ref erencing absent, unclear, irrelevant and/ore inaccurate.
Some inconsistencies and inaccuracies in ref erencing using Harvard System.
Some inconsistencies and inaccuracies in ref erencing using Harvard System.
Ref erencing accurate using the Harvard System. Generally relevant/appropriate.
Ref erencing clear, entirely relevant and accurate using the Harvard System.
Ref erencing clear, entirely relevant and accurate using the Harvard System.
56. PRESENTATION
20-34 SIGNIFICANT
FAILURE
35-39 MARGINAL
FAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59
SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100
OUTSTANDING
GROUP WORK
20-34 SIGNIFICANT
FAILURE
35-39 MARGINAL
FAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59
SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100
OUTSTANDING
LENGTH
20-34 SIGNIFICANT
FAILURE
35-39 MARGINAL
FAILURE
Oral Presentation ONLY
Unsatisf actory speed of delivery and audibility. Failure to stimulate interest or
discussion.
Unsatisf actory speed of delivery and audibility. Failure to stimulate interest or
discussion.
Well-pace delivery but some f luctuations in speed and audibility. Some success n
promoting discussion.
Well-pace delivery but some f luctuations in speed and audibility. Some success n
promoting discussion.
Well-paced, clear and conf ident delivery. Good promotion of discussion and its
management.
Excellent clarity, pace and conf ident delivery. Excellent/outstanding promotion,
management and closure of discussion.
Excellent clarity, pace and conf ident delivery. Excellent/outstanding promotion,
management and closure of discussion.
70-84
Excellent
Group Work/Self Direction
Failure to engage in organisation of work or make meaningf ul contribution to
group activity.
Failure to engage in organisation of work or make meaningf ul contribution to
group activity.
Basic/satisf actory engagement with task. Limited contribution made to group
activity.
Basic/satisf actory engagement with task. Limited contribution made to group
activity.
Good engagement with task and participation in group activity.
Excellent/outstanding organisation of personal task and group activity.
Excellent/outstanding organisation of personal task and group activity.
70-84
Excellent
This coursework has been penalized because it is signif icantly under or over
length.
